PPAR Research

PPAR Research / 2010 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 153252 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/153252

Rakesh P. Patel, Stephen Barnes, "Isoflavones and PPAR Signaling: A Critical Target in Cardiovascular, Metastatic, and Metabolic Disease", PPAR Research, vol. 2010, Article ID 153252, 10 pages, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/153252

Isoflavones and PPAR Signaling: A Critical Target in Cardiovascular, Metastatic, and Metabolic Disease

Academic Editor: Sander Kersten
Received15 Jul 2010
Accepted17 Dec 2010
Published24 Feb 2011


Isoflavone intake through foods and dietary supplements has both health advocates and critics. The latter come from a concern about the estrogenic effects of isoflavones in certain species. However, careful removal of isoflavones and other estrogens from the diet of rodents leads to the metabolic syndrome. These results suggest that isoflavones have other mechanisms of action, potentially those involving regulation of fatty acid metabolism via the nuclear receptors PPARα and PPARγ. The goal of this paper was to examine the evidence for isoflavone/PPAR signaling and to identify diseases in which such signaling would have an important impact. It is therefore of note that investigators using a chemical structure approach to discover PPAR ligands identified isoflavones as the best structures in the library of compounds that they tested. Future studies will involve careful identification of the underlying mechanisms whereby isoflavones have their action via PPAR signaling.

1. Introduction

The importance of plant estrogens (phytoestrogens) in the human diet has become a topic of great interest [1], as well as dispute [2]. The principal phytoestrogens in the American and Western European diets are the isoflavones in soy foods [3, 4]. It is noteworthy that soy protein is widely used for animal diets both in commercial food production and for animals in research studies. In the latter, it has been realized by several investigators that isoflavones have significant physiological effects. Many toxicologists have been concerned that the estrogenic properties of isoflavones could lead to infertility [5]. Such a connection was first observed in sheep infertility in Western Australia which was attributed to the red clover (Trifolium pratense) that they consume. Red clover contains large amounts of isoflavones [6]. Similar infertility effects were observed in captive cheetahs [7], although this may be related to the failure of the cat family to glucuronidate many xenobiotics [8]. On the other hand, removal of soy from the diets of rats in chemoprevention experiments led to an increase in incidence of chemically induced mammary tumors [9]. Similarly, soy improved the blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats on a high-salt diet [10] and ameliorated the cold sensitivity of mice with gene knockouts of the first members of the β oxidation of long-chain fatty acids [11]. Many such examples of the disparate effects of isoflavones have been reported which stem, in part, from a lack of understanding of biological mechanisms of action of isoflavones in individual species.

In this paper, we discuss several lines of emerging evidence implicating isoflavones as activators of PPARα and PPARγ. Indeed, we hypothesize that isoflavone-dependent activation of PPARα and PPARγ signaling is key to understanding how these compounds affect multiple pathophysiological processes. Intriguingly, a study employing structure-based virtual screening with induced fit locking analysis for identifying novel PPARγ ligands revealed that out of a natural product library comprising 200 compounds isoflavones were the optimal PPARγ ligands [12]. We have shown that modification of isoflavones by nitration and/or chlorination, which may occur in vivo, forms novel products with altered efficacy for PPARγ activation [13, 14]. Additionally, a recent comprehensive structure-activity relationship study demonstrated that the 7-hydroxy-benzopyran-4-one structure, which comprises the core isoflavone (and other flavonoids) structure (Figure 1), is key for PPAR activation [15]. Selective modification of this core can form molecules with dual PPARα- and PPARγ- ligand-binding activity [15]. From this perspective, isoflavones and their biological metabolites may provide the template for the next generation of PPAR agonists. Isoflavones are naturally occurring compounds and are safely ingested in amounts up to 100 mg/day. This is an exciting area of investigation and underscores the possibility that these compounds could be used therapeutically with a low occurrence of unwanted side effects. This paper comprises summaries of several aspects of isoflavones: their biochemistry and chemistry, their dietary intake, bioavailability and metabolism, their association with prevention of chronic disease, and their mechanisms of action, with special emphasis on PPAR signaling.

2. Biosynthesis and Chemistry of Isoflavones

Isoflavones are members of the huge family of plant polyphenols [16]. The polyphenols include bioflavonoids (e.g., quercetin, catechins, proanthocyanidins) and stilbenoids (resveratrol). Bioflavonoids consist of many classes. Depending on the position of the aromatic B-ring substituent on the heterocyclic C-ring, they can be broadly separated into flavonoids and isoflavonoids. Both are derived from a common precursor, phenylalanine. Following the formation of the flavonoid ring system, the aromatic B-ring migrates from the 2-position to the 3-position catalyzed by an enzyme restricted to tropical leguminous plants. Edible plants containing the highest concentrations of isoflavones are soybeans (Glycine max Merrill) [17], kudzu root (Pueraria lobata) [18], and the American groundnut (Apios americana) [19].

The isoflavones in each of these plants are principally glycoside conjugates of daidzein (7,4′-dihydroxyisoflavone) and genistein (5,7,4′-trihydroxyisoflavone). In soy, the conjugates are the 7-O-β-D-glucopyranosides with additional esterification on the 6′′-position of the glucose moiety [20, 21]. The conjugate groups are removed either by fermentation (to make miso, soy paste, and tempeh) [3] or by intestinal hydrolysis induced by enzymes in the wall of the intestine (lactose phlorizin hydrolase) [22] or by bacteria. In the kudzu root, C-glucoside conjugates of isoflavones (e.g., puerarin, daidzein 8-C-β-glucopyranoside) predominate [18]. These are absorbed and excreted without hydrolysis, probably by Na+-dependent glucose transporter systems.

3. Dietary Intake of Isoflavones

In the Western diet, exposure to isoflavones comes mostly from the use of soy protein to impart useful characteristics to foods such as low-fat dairy and bakery products, soups, doughnuts, hamburger buns, canned fish, and whole turkeys [23]. In addition, vegetarians and those seeking low-fat diets consume soy foods such as soy milk, tofu, and textured vegetable protein. Athletes wanting a high-protein/low-fat diet use isolated soy protein. The average consumer has a daily intake of 1-2 mg isoflavones [24], giving rise to plasma concentrations from 20 to 150 nM. Those consuming 1-2 soy meals a day (20–40 mg isoflavones) have plasma concentrations ranging from 200 to 3000 nM [25]. This wide range of plasma concentrations is typical of many orally ingested therapeutics and represents differences in uptake from and metabolism in the gut, as well as differences in tissue metabolism and urinary and fecal excretion. Isoflavones are also available as over-the-counter dietary supplements nominally containing 50 mg per pill. This enables considerably higher isoflavone intakes. Zeisel and his colleagues have reported phase 1-dose escalation studies where daily doses of >1,000 mg soy isoflavones were used without reported significant hazards [26, 27].

The isoflavones in the blood, as for physiological steroids and many other xenobiotics, are principally β-glucuronides, with lesser amounts of sulfate esters and only low (10–100 nM) concentrations of their aglycone forms [28]. Isoflavones also undergo metabolism in the large intestine (Figure 2), and the bacterial products such as dihydrodaidzein (DHD), O-desmethylangolensin (ODMA), and S-(-)equol enter the circulation [29]. Whereas DHD and ODMA are present in most subjects, only 20–30% of people studied producing S-(-)equol [30, 31]. The discussion above is presented to underscore the importance of appreciating the range of concentrations achieved in vivo together with the knowledge that effects of isoflavone consumption may in fact be mediated by their derivatives from intestinal bacterial and/or host cell metabolism, in understanding their mechanisms of action.

In the next sections, we select some of the diseases that have been shown to be modulated by isoflavones and examine the potential sites of involvement of PPAR signaling and other mechanisms of action.

4. Association with Chronic Diseases: Cellular and Animal Models

4.1. Isoflavones and Cardiovascular Disease

Consumption of isoflavones is associated with protection against atherosclerosis, a chronic disease of the vessel wall that underlies the development of many acute cardiovascular disease events including myocardial infarction and stroke [3234]. These observations are supported by experimental studies in diverse animal models of atherosclerosis showing that dietary isoflavones can inhibit the disease [3537]. Interestingly, if isoflavones are administered only in the latter stages of disease, the protective effects are lost suggesting that these polyphenols target the early events of atherosclerosis [38]. Less clear are the mechanisms by which isoflavones inhibit atherosclerosis. The two general hypotheses are that these compounds are antioxidants and/or modulate specific signaling pathways related to inflammation in the vasculature that affects the disease [39]. With antioxidant effects, the concept has been that by scavenging reactive species, which would otherwise promote oxidative damage, isoflavones prevent atherosclerosis. The most cited example in this case is the inhibition of low-density lipoprotein oxidation, formation of which is central in atherogenesis [40]. More recent evidence suggests the hypothesis that isoflavones modulate vascular disease by affecting signaling pathways. In this paradigm, low (submicromolar) concentrations of isoflavones activate the specific signaling pathways that regulate cellular responses to inflammation. Two candidate pathways defined to date which meet this criterion are activation of ERβ and that of PPARs [41, 42]. We focus the discussion in this paper on PPARs and note that activation of PPARα, or –γ, has been viewed mainly from the perspective of the regulation of genes that control lipid and glucose metabolism [43]. However, emerging data suggest critical roles in modulating vascular inflammatory and immune responses also [4448]. For example, PPARγ ligands decrease atherosclerotic lesion size in experimental models [49]. The anti-inflammatory effects of PPARs appear to be restricted to the α and γ isotypes, and from the perspective of controlling endothelial function, PPARγ ligands inhibit cytokine-dependent expression of adhesion molecules (although these responses are dependent upon cell type, nature of the inflammatory stimulus, and specific ligand used) [44, 48]. With respect to isoflavones, cell and animal studies have shown these compounds to be agonists for PPARα- and PPARγ-dependent pathways (see below). For example, the antidiabetic effects of isoflavones are associated with PPARγ activation in macrophages [49], and with respect to vascular inflammation specifically our published studies show that isoflavones activate PPARγ in the endothelium and in turn results in an inhibition of monocyte rolling and adhesion, a key step in inflammation [13, 14] (Figure 3).

4.2. Cancer

Little consideration has been given by the cancer research community to possible roles of isoflavone-directed PPAR signaling [50]. Nonetheless, genistein has been shown to lower the production of prostaglandin E2 by MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells and to reduce invasiveness of these cells [51]. The effect of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in activating PPARγ was dependent on genistein [52]. Effects of isoflavones on lipid signaling may be an important aspect of carcinogenesis and tumor invasiveness.

4.3. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

This rare lung disease affects 1 in 100,00 women [53]. It is caused by migration of uterine smooth muscle cells to the lung where they form cysts and cause loss of lung function. Many of the women have mutations in tuberin (TSC1) and harmartin (TSC2) that form the tuberous sclerosis protein complex [54]. The TSC1/TSC2 complex is a critical player in the control of mTOR, a master regulator of cellular metabolism. The migration of ELT-3 cells to the lungs in a rodent model of lymphangioleiomyomatosis is driven by 17β-estradiol [55]. There is a concern that the isoflavones may mimic this action of estrogen [56]. However, a recent study on estrogen proliferation of ELT-3s cell also showed that genistein blocked this action of 17β-estradiol [57]. Importantly, genistein’s inhibitory effect was in turn attenuated by the PPARγ inhibitor GW9662 [57]. This underscores the likelihood that the action of isoflavones in mammals including man is multi-factorial and that PPAR signaling is a target of the isoflavones.

4.4. Metabolic Syndrome

There is an extensive literature going back to 2001 linking soy and its isoflavones to lipid metabolism and the metabolic syndrome. Harmon and Harp showed that genistein inhibited the proliferation and differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells, a preadipocyte cell line [58]. Genistein also increased lipolysis in these cells [58]. These investigators also demonstrated that genistein blocked the DNA binding and transcriptional activity of the CCAAT-/enhancer-binding protein beta by promoting the production of C/EBP homologous protein [58]. This in turn impacted PPARγ protein expression [58]. A differential effect of genistein was observed in mesenchymal progenitor cells and revealed opposing effects of estrogen receptor and PPARγ pathways [59]. At low genistein concentrations, the estrogen-like effect was observed, whereas at micromolar concentrations, PPARγ activation predominated [59]. This raises the issue of which of these two effects are observed in vivo. Mezei et al. showed that diabetic Zucker rats fed a high isoflavone diet have lower triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations [49]. They also demonstrated that genistein and daidzein significantly increased PPARα- and PPARγ-directed gene expression in murine RAW 264.7 cells [49].

5. Isoflavone Mechanisms of Action

Whereas isoflavones and other phytoestrogens were originally studied because of their estrogenic activity in certain species, it has become clear that they have additional mechanisms of action that may override their estrogenic effects. Genistein was identified in 1987 as a potent inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase [60]. This was important to the cancer field at that time since genistein, unlike comparable, chemically synthesized tyrosine kinase inhibitors, did not have toxic effects at the doses needed for tyrosine kinase inhibition. Genistein has been widely used as a pharmacological tyrosine kinase inhibitor often without validation that any changes in protein phosphorylation observed on Western blots were due to direct genistein inhibition of phosphorylation as opposed to indirect effects due to a reduction in the parent protein.

Like other polyphenols, many studies have shown that isoflavones can scavenge various reactive oxygen species (RO), reactive nitrogen species (RN) or reactive chlorine species (RCS) that are formed endogenously during the innate immune response, but which also cause tissue injury that leads to the development of acute and chronic inflammatory disease [6169]. In doing so, the “antioxidant” effect of isoflavones has been proposed to mediate their cytoprotective effects. This concept is supported by human studies showing a decrease in plasma markers of lipid peroxidation after consuming isoflavones [70]. Concerns over the antioxidant hypothesis include the discrepancy between isoflavone concentrations achieved in the circulation (0.1–1 μM) after dietary ingestion and those required to observe a significant inhibition of oxidative damage ex vivo and in vitro with the latter typically being ≥10-fold higher. Another consideration is that although the primary reactive species may be scavenged, the products of the reaction and their reactivities must also be considered. With respect to isoflavones, we have shown that upon reacting with lipid peroxyl radicals (which inhibits lipid peroxidation), the corresponding isoflavone oxidation product (a phenoxyl radical) is not inert but can also promote oxidative damage itself [67]. Interestingly, the presence of ascorbate can reform the parent isoflavone from this intermediate allowing the isoflavone to act as an antioxidant in a “catalytic” manner which would also allow it to exert significant antioxidant effects in vivo at low concentrations [65, 67]. Finally, it is important to note that a key variable in assessing mechanisms of action is the fact that isoflavone preparations are not typically homogenous but contain complex mixtures of structurally distinct molecules. Moreover, it is now apparent that isoflavone metabolism can give rise to an array of products which themselves have different biological activities. For example, equol is produced by the action of gut microflora on ingested daidzein (see above). Interestingly, the composition of this microflora is not homogenous across the human population, and recent studies suggest that “equol producers” receive the health benefits of isoflavones consumption more than “equol nonproducers” [71]. In a similar fashion, reaction between isoflavones and reactive species in vivo can form novel isoflavone derivatives. For example, reaction with the RNS peroxynitrite or with the RCS hypochlorous acid form mono- or dinitrated or chlorinated isoflavones, respectively [61, 62]. We have shown that nitration and/or chlorination changes the antioxidant activity of the products compared to the parent isoflavones and in some cases increases antioxidant potency [62]. In this case, the first reactions would scavenge the reactive species but in addition also form more potent antioxidant isoflavones. We postulate that such mechanisms described above may reconcile the differences between dose-response relationships for antioxidant effects of isoflavones in vivo versus in vitro [72].

Attempts to produce animal diets free of phytoestrogens to provide more consistency in experiments designed to investigate the effects of added phytoestrogens had an unexpected, but critically important, effect. The animals showed had a marked increase in weight with the phytoestrogen-free diets, mostly in the form of abdominal fat [73]. This result suggested that phytoestrogens have a role in preventing the metabolic syndrome which in turn points to possible activity in PPAR signaling.

6. Isoflavones and Cell Signaling: Activation of PPARs

Several studies have now developed the concept that activation of either PPARα and/or PPARγ is key to the biological effects of isoflavones [42]. This has been demonstrated in diverse experimental settings and cell types (including endothelium, monocytes, HepG2, bone marrow stromal cells) and importantly occurs at biologically relevant isoflavone concentrations. Using constructs containing either PPARα-/PPARγ- ligand binding-domains or sequences corresponding to promoter response elements, several independent studies [13, 42, 49, 74] have provided molecular evidence that isoflavones can stimulate PPARα/γ- dependent gene expression. Importantly, this results in diverse functional effects that include modulating adipogenesis to regulating cellular responses to inflammation. Moreover, these cellular responses are inhibited by pharmacologically (using PPAR inhibitors) or molecularly (using siRNA-mediated downregulation of PPAR expression) based strategies to affect PPAR signaling [13, 14, 42, 49, 74]. The latter is critical, since the literature is replete with examples of putative PPAR ligands that subsequent studies have shown, in fact, to mediate cellular affects via PPAR-independent mechanisms. Figure 3 illustrates these points with data from our previous studies [13, 14] showing that in endothelial cells, isoflavones stimulate PPARγ-dependent transcription of genes containing the PPARγ response elements in their promoter, and this results in the inhibition of subsequent inflammatory cytokine (TNFα)-dependent monocyte rolling and adhesion (Figure 4).

Interestingly, a survey of the literature does not reveal a clear association between the activation of either PPARα or PPARγ and the mediation of a biological response with evidence for both in mediating anti-inflammatory effects of isoflavones reported. For example red clover isoflavones inhibiting cytokine release from LPS activated macrophages via PPARα [75]. Similarly, PPARα activation has been discussed in the context of how isoflavones may prevent influenza [76]. On the other hand, anti-inflammatory effects have been shown to be PPARγ dependent also including inhibition of amyloid-beta-dependent cytokine formation in astrocytes [77]. Our studies have shown that PPARγ, but not PPARα, is required for isoflavone-dependent inhibition of leukocyte rolling and adhesion to activated endothelial cells [13, 14] (Figure 4). Other reports in defined cell systems have also reported selective activation of one PPAR isoform and not the other. For example, methanolic (IF) extracts from soybean seeds stimulated transcriptional activity of PPARα, but not PPARγ, genes in monocyte U937 cells [78]. As the above discussion suggests, a detailed understanding of how isoflavones activate PPARα or PPARγ is lacking. It is clear, however, that isoflavones can activate both PPARα and PPARγ, and it is not surprising then that a number of studies have documented roles for these polyphenols in preventing diabetes and the metabolic syndrome with mechanisms ranging from improving lipid homeostasis to insulin sensitivity [49, 7986].

The discussion above serves to underscore the heterogeneity of responses elicited by isoflavone-mediated activation of PPARs. It remains unclear to date why in some cases both PPARα and PPARγ are activated, while in others why only one PPAR isoform is activated versus the other. Potential factors/variables that may modulate isoflavone-dependent activation of PPARs and signaling in general include the cell type, the presence/absence of PPAR co-activators, competition between ERα and PPAR signaling, and the dose and composition of isoflavones preparations (see Figure 5). For example, Dang elegantly showed that low concentrations (<1 μM) of genistein stimulated osteogenesis whilst inhibiting adipogenesis in mesenchymal progenitor cells via ER mechanisms, whereas at slightly higher concentrations, the opposite response was observed which was mediated by PPARγ activation [80]. Similarly, isoflavone-dependent activation of PPARγ was shown to be important in the inhibition of estradiol-induced proliferation of uterine leiomyoma [57]. These latter examples highlight the potential for isoflavones to modulate estrogen signaling via indirect mechanisms and suggest a complex cross-talk between PPAR and ER signaling, that is regulated by isoflavones (Figure 5). With respect to isoflavones’ type, studies have shown that several structurally distinct isoflavones can activate PPARs with similar efficacies [13]. It is not clear how the presence of different isoflavones would affect PPAR activation. If additive or synergistic, however, one can speculate that the effective dose of a given isoflavone to activate PPARα/γ would be even lower in the context of a complex mixture as occurs during dietary exposure. In this scenario of exposure to multiple different isoflavones, we speculate that PPARα/PPARγ activation represents the primary signaling pathways affected by these compounds. Finally, we note that other factors may also modulate PPAR activation efficacy as illustrated by dietary exposure studies showing that soy protein alone increased PPARα, but this response was increased further in the presence of isoflavones [87].

7. Remaining Questions and Future Perspectives

The potential role of PPARs to mediate biological actions of isoflavones is gaining appreciation. Less clear are the molecular mechanisms that are involved. Do isoflavones bind PPARs directly and/or do they affect PPAR signaling indirectly? Structure-activity relationship studies clearly suggest the former, but the latter possibility should also be considered. For example, oxidized fatty acids have been suggested to be potent PPARγ agonists and isoflavones may influence these by affecting redox reactions. What controls the dual effects of isoflavones as PPARα and PPARγ agonists? What are the downstream targets of isoflavone-mediated PPAR activation, are they unique or do they overlap with PPAR activation by synthetic agonists? This is an intriguing question, since to our knowledge isoflavones are the only class of molecules that can activate both ERβ and PPARs, raising the question of whether there is cross-talk between ERβ and PPARs activation, and how this is regulated. Coupled with a better understanding of the potential for antagonistic, additive, or synergistic effects between structurally distinct isoflavones in activating PPARs, we feel that addressing these questions is likely to reveal novel insights into how these polyphenols influence diverse biological processes.


Funds for research on isoflavones have come through a sub-contract from the Purdue University as part of a grant from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health (P50 AT00477, C.M. Weaver, PI) to the Purdue University-University of Alabama Botanicals Center for Age-Related Disease and from a grant from the National Cancer Institute (U54 CA100949, SB, PI) to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Nutrient-Gene Interaction.


  1. M. A. Klein, R. L. Nahin, M. J. Messina et al., “Guidance from an NIH workshop on designing, implementing, and reporting clinical studies of soy interventions,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1192S–1204S, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. K. Rozman, J. Bhatia, A. M. Calafat et al., “NTP-CERHR expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of soy formula,” Birth Defects Research Part B, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 280–397, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. L. Coward, N. C. Barnes, K. D. R. Setchell, and S. Barnes, “Genistein, daidzein, and their beta-glycoside conjugates—antitumor isoflavones in soybean foods from American and Asian diets,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1961–1967, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. A. Murphy, T. Song, G. Buseman et al., “Isoflavones in retail and institutional soy foods,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 2697–2704, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. N. Jefferson, E. Padilla-Banks, and R. R. Newbold, “Disruption of the female reproductive system by the phytoestrogen genistein,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 308–316, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. R. Adams, “Detection of the effects of phytoestrogens on sheep and cattle,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1509–1515, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. D. R. Setchell, S. J. Gosselin, M. B. Welsh et al., “Dietary estrogens—a probable cause of infertility and liver disease in captive cheetahs,” Gastroenterology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 225–233, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. H. Court and D. J. Greenblatt, “Molecular genetic basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation by cats: UGT1A6 is a pseudogene, and evidence for reduced diversity of expressed hepatic UGT1A isoforms,” Pharmacogenetics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 355–369, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. Barnes, C. Grubbs, K. D. Setchell, and J. Carlson, “Soybeans inhibit mammary tumors in models of breast cancer,” Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, vol. 347, pp. 239–253, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  10. T. M. Cho, N. Peng, J. T. Clark et al., “Genistein attenuates the hypertensive effects of dietary NaCl in hypertensive male rats,” Endocrinology, vol. 148, no. 11, pp. 5396–5402, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. M. Schuler, S. Barnes, B. A. Gower, and P. A. Wood, “Dietary phytoestrogens increase metabolic resistance (cold tolerance) in long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase-deficient mice,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 1028–1031, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  12. N. K. Salam, T. H. W. Huang, B. P. Kota, M. S. Kim, Y. Li, and D. E. Hibbs, “Novel PPAR-gamma agonists identified from a natural product library: a virtual screening, induced-fit docking and biological assay study,” Chemical Biology and Drug Design, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. K. Chacko, R. T. Chandler, T. L. D'Alessandro et al., “Anti-inflammatory effects of isoflavones are dependent on flow and human endothelial cell PPARγ,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 351–356, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  14. B. K. Chacko, R. T. Chandler, A. Mundhekar et al., “Revealing anti-inflammatory mechanisms of soy isoflavones by flow: modulation of leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. H908–H915, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Matin, N. Gavande, M. S. Kim et al., “7-Hydroxy-benzopyran-4-one derivatives: a novel pharmacophore of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α and -γ (PPARα and γ) dual agonists,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 21, pp. 6835–6850, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. B. Harborne, Ed., The Flavonoids: Advances in Research Since 1986, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  17. C. L. Aguiar, A. S. Baptista, S. M. Alencar, R. Haddad, and M. N. Eberlin, “Analysis of isoflavonoids from leguminous plant extracts by RPHPLC/DAD and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. K. Prasain, K. Jones, M. Kirk et al., “Profiling and quantification of isoflavonoids in kudzu dietary supplements by high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 15, pp. 4213–4218, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Barnes, C. C. Wang, M. Kirk et al., “HPLC-mass spectrometry of isoflavonoids in soy and the american groundnut, Apios americana,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 505, pp. 77–88, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. Kudou, Y. Fleury, D. Welti et al., “Malonyl isoflavone glycosides in soybean seeds (Glycine max MERRILL),” Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, vol. 55, pp. 2227–2233, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. Barnes, M. Kirk, and L. Coward, “Isoflavones and their conjugates in soy foods: extraction conditions and analysis by HPLC-mass spectrometry,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2466–2474, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. J. Day, F. J. Cañada, J. C. Díaz et al., “Dietary flavonoid and isoflavone glycosides are hydrolysed by the lactase site of lactase phlorizin hydrolase,” FEBS Letters, vol. 468, no. 2-3, pp. 166–170, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. L. Horn-Ross, S. Barnes, M. Lee et al., “Assessing phytoestrogen exposure in epidemiologic studies: development of a database (United States),” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 289–298, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. O. K. Chun, S. J. Chung, and W. O. Song, “Urinary isoflavones and their metabolites validate the dietary isoflavone intakes in US adults,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 245–254, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Urban, W. Irwin, M. Kirk et al., “The effect of isolated soy protein on plasma biomarkers in elderly men with elevated serum prostate specific antigen,” Journal of Urology, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 294–300, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. G. Busby, A. R. Jeffcoat, L. T. Bloedon et al., “Clinical characteristics and pharmacokinetics of purified soy isoflavones: single-dose administration to healthy men,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 126–136, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  27. L. T. Bloedon, A. Robert Jeffcoat, W. Lopaczynski et al., “Safety and pharmacokinetics of purified soy isoflavones: single-dose administration to postmenopausal women,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1126–1137, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  28. C. O. Cimino, S. R. Shelnutt, M. J. J. Ronis, and T. M. Badger, “An LC-MS method to determine concentrations of isoflavones and their sulfate and glucuronide conjugates in urine,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 287, no. 1-2, pp. 69–82, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. E. Kelly, C. Nelson, M. A. Waring, G. E. Joannou, and A. Y. Reeder, “Metabolites of dietary (soya) isoflavones in human urine,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 223, no. 1-2, pp. 9–22, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. Axelson, J. Sjovall, B. E. Gustaffson, and K. D. R. Setchell, “Soya. A dietary source of non-steroidal oestrogen equol in man and animals,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  31. C. Atkinson, K. M. Newton, E. J. Aiello Bowles, M. Yong, and J. W. Lampe, “Demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors and dietary intakes in relation to daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes among premenopausal women in the United States,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 679–687, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  32. L. Wroblewski Lissin and J. P. Cooke, “Phytoestrogens and cardiovascular health,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1403–1410, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Navab, A. M. Fogelman, J. A. Berliner et al., “Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 18C–23C, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  34. F. Ursini, F. Tubaro, J. Rong, and A. Sevanian, “Optimization of nutrition: polyphenols and vascular protection,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 241–249, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  35. M. S. Anthony, T. B. Clarkson, and J. K. Williams, “Effects of soy isoflavones on atherosclerosis: potential mechanisms,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1390S–1393S, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  36. M. J. Tikkanen and H. Adlercreutz, “Dietary soy-derived isoflavone phytoestrogens: could they have a role in coronary heart disease prevention?” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. Yamakoshi, M. K. Piskula, T. Izumi et al., “Isoflavone aglycone-rich extract without soy protein attenuates atherosclerosis development in cholesterol-fed rabbits,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 130, no. 8, pp. 1887–1893, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. M. Averill, B. J. Bennett, M. Rattazzi et al., “Neither antioxidants nor genistein inhibit the progression of established atherosclerotic lesions in older apoE deficient mice,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Barnes, B. Boersma, R. Patel et al., “Isoflavonoids and chronic disease: mechanisms of action,” BioFactors, vol. 12, no. 1–4, pp. 209–215, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. A. Berliner and J. W. Heinecke, “The role of oxidized lipoproteins in atherogenesis,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 707–727, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. G. G. J. M. Kuiper, J. G. Lemmen, B. Carlsson et al., “Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor β,” Endocrinology, vol. 139, no. 10, pp. 4252–4263, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  42. M. L. Ricketts, D. D. Moore, W. J. Banz, O. Mezei, and N. F. Shay, “Molecular mechanisms of action of the soy isoflavones includes activation of promiscuous nuclear receptors. A review,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 321–330, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Berger and J. A. Wagner, “Physiological and therapeutic roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors,” Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–174, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  44. S. M. Jackson, F. Parhami, X. P. Xi et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activators target human endothelial cells to inhibit leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2094–2104, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  45. J. Plutzky, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as therapeutic targets in inflammation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1764–1766, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Y. Liu, Y. Zhu, F. Rannou et al., “Laminar flow activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in vascular endothelial cells,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1128–1133, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. V. Pasceri, H. D. Wu, J. T. Willerson, and E. T. H. Yeh, “Modulation of vascular inflammation in vitro and in vivo by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activators,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 235–238, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  48. N. Marx, H. Duez, J. C. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and atherogenesis: regulators of gene expression in vascular cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1168–1178, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. O. Mezei, W. J. Banz, R. W. Steger, M. R. Peluso, T. A. Winters, and N. Shay, “Soy isoflavones exert antidiabetic and hypolipidemic effects through the PPAR pathways in obese Zucker rats and murine RAW 264.7 cells,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 1238–1243, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  50. L. Hilakivi-Clarke, C. Wang, M. Kalil, R. Riggins, and R. G. Pestell, “Nutritional modulation of the cell cycle and breast cancer,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 603–622, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. E. Horia and B. A. Watkins, “Complementary actions of docosahexaenoic acid and genistein on COX-2, PGE and invasiveness in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 809–815, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Nakagawa, D. Yamamoto, Y. Kiyozuka et al., “Effects of genistein and synergistic action in combination with eicosapentaenoic acid on the growth of breast cancer cell lines,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 448–454, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  53. W. K. Steagall, A. M. Taveira-DaSilva, and J. Moss, “Clinical and molecular insights into lymphangioleiomyomatosis,” Sarcoidosis Vasculitis and Diffuse Lung Diseases, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. S49–S66, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  54. D. A. Muzykewicz, A. Sharma, V. Muse, A. L. Numis, J. Rajagopal, and E. A. Thiele, “TSC1 and TSC2 mutations in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis and tuberous sclerosis complex,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 465–468, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. J. Yu, V. A. Robb, T. A. Morrison et al., “Estrogen promotes the survival and pulmonary metastasis of tuberin-null cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 2635–2640, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. Barnes, “The biochemistry, chemistry and physiology of the isoflavones in soybeans and their food products,” Lymphatic Research and Biology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Miyake, T. Takeda, A. Isobe et al., “Repressive effect of the phytoestrogen genistein on estradiol-induced uterine leiomyoma cell proliferation,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 403–409, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. W. Harmon, Y. M. Patel, and J. B. Harp, “Genistein inhibits CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ) activity and 3T3-L1 adipogenesis by increasing C/EBP homologous protein expression,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 367, no. 1, pp. 203–208, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Q. C. Liao, Y. L. Li, Y. F. Qin et al., “Inhibition of adipocyte differentiation by phytoestrogen genistein through a potential downregulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 activity,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1853–1864, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. T. Akiyama, J. Ishida, S. Nakagawa et al., “Genistein, a specific inhibitor of tyrosine-specific protein kinases,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 262, no. 12, pp. 5592–5595, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  61. B. J. Boersma, R. P. Patel, M. Kirk et al., “Chlorination and nitration of soy isoflavones,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 368, no. 2, pp. 265–275, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. B. J. Boersma, T. D'Alessandro, M. R. Benton et al., “Neutrophil myeloperoxidase chlorinates and nitrates soy isoflavones and enhances their antioxidant properties,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1417–1430, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. T. D'Alessandro, J. Prasain, M. R. Benton et al., “Polyphenols, inflammatory response, and cancer prevention: chlorination of isoflavones by human neutrophils,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 3773S–3777S, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  64. W. S. Xiang, J. Zhang, J. D. Wang et al., “Isolation and identification of chlorinated genistein from Actinoplanes sp. HBDN08 with antioxidant and antitumor activities,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1933–1938, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. Hwang, A. Sevanian, H. N. Hodis, and F. Ursini, “Synergistic inhibition of LDL oxidation by phytoestrogens and ascorbic acid,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. N. Kerry and M. Abbey, “The isoflavone genistein inhibits copper and peroxyl radical mediated low density lipoprotein oxidation in vitro,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 341–347, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. R. P. Patel, B. J. Boersma, J. H. Crawford et al., “Antioxidant mechanisms of isoflavones in lipid systems: paradoxical effects of peroxyl radical scavenging,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1570–1581, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. B. Ruiz-Larrea, A. R. Mohan, G. Paganga, N. J. Miller, G. P. Bolwell, and C. A. Rice-Evans, “Antioxidant activity of phytoestrogenic isoflavones,” Free Radical Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  69. M. J. Tikkanen, K. Wähälä, S. Ojala, V. Vihma, and H. Adlercreutz, “Effect of soybean phytoestrogen intake on low density lipoprotein oxidation resistance,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 3106–3110, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. H. Wiseman, J. D. O'Reilly, H. Adlercreutz et al., “Isoflavone phytoestrogens consumed in soy decrease F-isoprostane concentrations and increase resistance of low-density lipoprotein to oxidation in humans,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 395–400, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  71. K. D. R. Setchell, N. M. Brown, and E. Lydeking-Olsen, “The clinical importance of the metabolite equol—a clue to the effectiveness of soy and its isoflavones,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 3577–3584, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  72. S. Barnes and H. Kim, “Cautions and research needs identified at the equol, soy, and menopause research leadership conference,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 140, no. 7, pp. 1390S–1394S, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. C. R. Cederroth, M. Vinciguerra, F. Kühne et al., “A phytoestrogen-rich diet increases energy expenditure and decreases adiposity in mice,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 1467–1473, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Z.-C. Dang, V. Audinot, S. E. Papapoulos, J. A. Boutin, and C. W. G. M. Löwik, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) as a molecular target for the soy phytoestrogen genistein,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 2, pp. 962–967, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. M. Mueller, S. Hobiger, and A. Jungbauer, “Red clover extract: a source for substances that activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α and ameliorate the cytokine secretion profile of lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages,” Menopause, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 379–387, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. L. M. Alleva, C. Cai, and I. A. Clark, “Using complementary and alternative medicines to target the host response during severe influenza,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 501–510, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. S. L. Valles, P. Dolz-Gaiton, J. Gambini et al., “Estradiol or genistein prevent Alzheimer's disease-associated inflammation correlating with an increase PPARγ expression in cultured astrocytes,” Brain Research, vol. 1312, no. C, pp. 138–144, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. V. S. Carrara, A. A. Amato, F. A. R. Neves et al., “Effects of a methanolic fraction of soybean seeds on the transcriptional activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR),” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 545–550, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  79. A. Bitto, D. Altavilla, A. Bonaiuto et al., “Effects of aglycone Genistein in a rat experimental model of postmenopausal metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 367–376, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. Z. C. Dang, “Dose-dependent effects of soy phyto-oestrogen genistein on adipocytes: mechanisms of action: other review,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 342–349, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. Kim, H. J. Shin, S. Y. Kim et al., “Genistein enhances expression of genes involved in fatty acid catabolism through activation of PPARα,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 220, no. 1-2, pp. 51–58, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. D. Y. Kwon, J. S. Jang, J. E. Lee, Y. S. Kim, D. H. Shin, and S. Park, “The isoflavonoid aglycone-rich fractions of Chungkookjang, fermented unsalted soybeans, enhance insulin signaling and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activity in vitro,” BioFactors, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 245–258, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. L. Noriega-López, A. R. Tovar, M. Gonzalez-Granillo et al., “Pancreatic insulin secretion in rats fed a soy protein high fat diet depends on the interaction between the amino acid pattern and isoflavones,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 28, pp. 20657–20666, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. J. Ronis, Y. Chen, J. Badeaux, and T. M. Badger, “Dietary soy protein isolate attenuates metabolic syndrome in rats via effects on PPAR, LXR, and SREBP signaling,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, no. 8, pp. 1431–1438, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. P. Shen, M. H. Liu, T. Y. Ng, Y. H. Chan, and E. L. Yong, “Differential effects of isoflavones, from Astragalus Membranaceus and Pueraria Thomsonii, on the activation of PPARα, PPARγ, and adipocyte differentiation in vitro,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 899–905, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  86. J. D. Wagner, L. Zhang, M. K. Shadoan et al., “Effects of soy protein and isoflavones on insulin resistance and adiponectin in male monkeys,” Metabolism, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. S24–S31, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Y. Takahashi and T. Ide, “Effects of soy protein and isoflavone on hepatic fatty acid synthesis and oxidation and mRNA expression of uncoupling proteins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in adipose tissues of rats,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 682–693, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Rakesh P. Patel and Stephen Barnes. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.