Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stem Cells International
Volume 2017, Article ID 4528941, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4528941
Review Article

De Novo Human Cardiac Myocytes for Medical Research: Promises and Challenges

1University of Ottawa Heart Institute & Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2Department of Cardiology, Xi’an No. 3 Hospital, Xi’an, China
3Department of Cardiology, Xi’an Central Hospital, Xi’an, China
4Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
5Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
6Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Wenbin Liang; ac.awattou@3nailw

Received 7 October 2016; Revised 23 January 2017; Accepted 1 February 2017; Published 20 February 2017

Academic Editor: Gary E. Lyons

Copyright © 2017 Veronique Hamel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The advent of cellular reprogramming technology has revolutionized biomedical research. De novo human cardiac myocytes can now be obtained from direct reprogramming of somatic cells (such as fibroblasts), from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs, which are reprogrammed from somatic cells), and from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Such de novo human cardiac myocytes hold great promise for in vitro disease modeling and drug screening and in vivo cell therapy of heart disease. Here, we review the technique advancements for generating de novo human cardiac myocytes. We also discuss several challenges for the use of such cells in research and regenerative medicine, such as the immature phenotype and heterogeneity of de novo cardiac myocytes obtained with existing protocols. We focus on the recent advancements in addressing such challenges.

1. The Need for Human Cardiac Myocytes in Biomedical Research

Despite extensive research, heart disease remains the number 1 killer worldwide leading to >17.3 million deaths in 2013, accounting for 31% of all cause deaths [1]. The economic burden for heart disease is estimated to be US$863 billion in 2010 and expected to increase to US$1,044 billion in 2030 [2]. On the other hand, market withdrawal of new drugs due to unexpected cardiotoxicity significantly contributes to the rising costs for drug developments [3]. One of the major reasons is that direct studies in human patients or healthy volunteers are limited by ethical concerns, and it is difficult to obtain and maintain primary human cardiac myocytes from patients for in vitro experiments. Accordingly, most heart research has been performed with experimental animal models and cultured animal cells. These animal studies are useful, but their values to understand human heart disease are compromised by profound species difference, such as in the composition of ion channels within the myocardial tissue [4], as well as differences in the size and beating rate of the hearts (500 beats/min in mouse versus 70 beats/min in human). Therefore, human cardiac myocytes that can be readily obtained without ethical limitations are needed to boost the fidelity of biomedical research.

2. Methods for Generating De Novo Human Cardiac Myocytes

Last decades have seen exciting advancements in biotechnology that make it possible to generate de novo human cardiac myocytes from embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), or somatic cells via direct cellular reprogramming. Here, we provide a brief review on this topic. For more details, the readers are referred to recent excellent reviews [5, 6].

2.1. Cardiac Differentiation of ESCs and iPSCs

The first human ESC line was established from surplus human embryos by Dr. Thomson’s group in 1998 [7], which is 17 years after the successful isolation of mouse ESC line from the inner cell mass of early mouse embryos in 1981 [8], because of the different characteristics and growth requirement between human and mouse ESC cells. Derived from early embryos, ESCs exhibit two important properties: (1) they can divide and self-renew indefinitely when kept in proper conditions; (2) they are pluripotent and thus have the potential to differentiate into all cell types of the three germ layers, including cardiac myocytes [9, 10]. The iPSC technique was invented in 2006 by Takahashi and Yamanaka [11] who discovered that ESC-like, pluripotent stem cells can be derived from differentiated fibroblasts by viral expression of four transcription factors—Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and cMyc—that are important for maintenance of ESC pluripotency. Like ESCs, human iPSCs can give rise to all cell types found in the human body, including cardiac myocytes [12, 13]. Unlike ESCs, iPSCs are generated without compromising human embryos, thus minimizing the ethical concerns. In addition, iPSCs can be derived from individual patients, making it possible to generate patient-specific iPSCs (and iPSC-derived cardiac myocytes) for personalized medicine research.

Most protocols for cardiac differentiation were established for ESCs and have been found to be largely applicable for iPSCs as well [1315]. The traditional embryoid body (EB) method employs serum-driven spontaneous differentiation of ESCs and iPSCs into different germ layer cells, in which cardiac myocytes can be found [16]. This protocol does not require expensive recombinant protein factors but has a low efficiency for generating cardiac myocytes (<5%). The second generation of cardiac differentiation protocols employ recombinant protein factors for stage-specific activation/inhibition of signaling pathways, to recapitulate the temporal pathway activities in embryonic heart development. Specifically, Activin A and BMP4 (bone morphogenetic protein 4) are included in cell culture at the early stage to induce mesoderm, which is followed by addition of Dkk1 (a Wnt inhibitor) and VEGF (vascular endothelin growth factor) to promote cardiac lineage specification [1719]. These directed cardiac differentiation protocols are highly efficient and capable of generating >70% cardiomyocytes (based on cTnT+ cells) but require expensive recombinant proteins, show significant batch-to-batch variation, and are labor-intensive especially when the EB formation is involved in the early stage [18]. The third generation of cardiac differentiation protocols only require the temporal modulation of the Wnt signaling pathway: activation at the early stage (e.g., with CHIR-99021) and inhibition (e.g., with Wnt-C59) at the late stage [2022]. These protocols are based on monolayer cell culture, do not require expensive protein factors, and generate cardiomyocytes at a high efficiency with small molecules alone.

2.2. Direct Cellular Reprogramming

In 2010, Dr. Srivastava’s group discovered that de novo cardiomyocytes can be generated by direct reprogramming of cultured mouse fibroblasts with 3 transcription factors (Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5) without the iPSC step [23]. Subsequent studies demonstrated direct cardiac reprogramming in animal hearts and such in vivo reprogramming has a higher efficiency than in cultured cells [24, 25]. Wang et al. investigated the effect of factor stoichiometry (Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5) on cardiac reprogramming and demonstrated that a higher level of Mef2c in combination with lower levels of Gata4 and Tbx5 increases reprogramming efficiency and promotes myocyte maturation [26]. A recent study by Zhou et al. identified Bmi1 as a key epigenetic barrier to cardiac reprogramming; inhibition of Bmi1 increases reprogramming efficiency and enhances the functional maturation of induced cardiomyocytes; Bmi1 inhibition can also substitute for Gata4 during the cardiac reprogramming [27]. Reprogramming of human fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes has been demonstrated, but additional factors (ESRRG and MESP1) are required [28]. In addition, different combinations of transcription factors and microRNAs have also been reported for direct reprogramming of somatic cells into cardiomyocytes with improved efficiency [2932]. For example, Song et al. showed that a combination of four transcription factors (Hand2, Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5) reprograms mouse tail-tip and cardiac fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes in cell culture [30]. Jayawardena et al. demonstrated that transient transfection of microRNA-1, -133, -208, and -499 is also capable of reprogramming fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte in vitro [29].

Most recently, Dr. Ding’s group has established a protocol that does not require transcription factors but uses only small molecules to reprogram human fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes [33]. This study is based on a cell activation and signaling-directed (CASD) reprogramming paradigm. The authors treated fibroblasts with chemicals to induce a progenitor fate in them and then applied cardiogenic molecules to differentiate the cells into mature cardiomyocytes. In sharp contrast to the transcription factor-mediated cardiac reprogramming that directly converts fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes, this method involves an early progenitor stage and the subsequent differentiation process. The advantage of direct cardiac reprogramming is that it does not involve the pluripotent stage and thus minimizes the risk of tumorigenesis after cardiomyocyte transplantation into host hearts. In addition, direct reprogramming can be performed in situ (inside the hearts) [6] and thus can avoid the issues of low survival, retention, and integration with host tissue, which are concerns for the cell transplantation strategy when iPSC- or ESC-derived cardiomyocytes are used. However, the efficiency of cardiomyocyte generation with direct reprogramming is much lower than that of cardiac differentiation of ESCs or iPSCs with current methods; the self-renewal property of ESCs and iPSCs also allows large scale cardiomyocyte generation.

3. Maturation of De Novo Human Cardiac Myocytes

Mature and immature cardiomyocytes have distinct properties in size, morphology, metabolism, and physiology. Although recent advances in technology have markedly improved the efficiency for de novo cardiomyocyte generation from pluripotent stem cells, the obtained cells exhibit an immature phenotype when maintained in standard culture [34, 35]. For example, hESC-derived cardiomyocytes typically have a small size (membrane capacity 18 pF versus 150 pF in adult cardiomyocytes) and a circular or irregular shape (versus rod-shape in adult), exhibit no T-tubules (present in adult and critical for excitation-contraction coupling), and use glucose as the primary metabolic substrate (versus fatty acid in adult), a more depolarized resting membrane potential (−60 mV versus −90 mV in adult), and a much slower action potential upstroke maximum velocity (50 V/s versus 250 V/s in adult) [35]. A study of the transcriptional landscape of cardiomyocyte maturation revealed marked shifts in cardiac gene expression during maturation and suggested that the immaturity of ESC-derived cardiomyocytes may result from dysregulation of critical transcription factors [36]. This immature phenotype represents a major challenge for the use of de novo cardiomyocytes in heart research, especially for disease modeling and drug testing for adult-onset heart disease. Therefore, much effort has been made to find ways to induce maturation of de novo cardiomyocytes (Table 1).

Table 1: Strategies to promote cardiomyocyte maturation.
3.1. Prolonged Cell Culture

Maturation is a natural development process, and therefore increasing the culture duration has become an obvious strategy to promote maturation of de novo cardiomyocytes. Sartiani et al. reported that maintaining hESC-derived cardiomyocytes in culture for 3 months promoted electrical maturation of the cells, such as increased current densities for (transient outward potassium current) and (inward rectifier potassium current) [37]. In addition, Kadota et al. demonstrated a time-dependent increase in the conduction velocity in a monolayer of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes cultured for 30 days [38]. Lundy et al. showed that long-term culture (80–120 days) of hESC- and hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes induced a more adult-like morphology and subcellular structure, including increased cell size, increased myofibril density, a better-organized sarcomere structure, and higher percentage of multinucleated cells [39]. Moreover, these long-term cultured hESC- and hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes also exhibit more mature calcium handling and electrophysiological properties [39]. In summary, maintaining cardiomyocytes in a prolonged culture is a proven strategy for cell maturation, but it is both time- and labor-intensive. Therefore, alternative approaches to accelerate cardiomyocyte maturation have been explored.

3.2. Electrical Stimulation

hESC- and hiPSC-derived cardiomyocyte cultures can beat spontaneously. Nunes et al. showed that forcing hESC-derived cardiomyocytes in 3-dimensional culture to beat faster at 3–6 Hz (180–360 beats/min) with electrical pacing markedly promoted cardiomyocyte maturation, with organized myofibril structure and improved conduction velocity, as well as more adult-like calcium handling and electrophysiological properties [40]. Chan et al. reported that electrical stimulation of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes at 1 Hz increased expression of cardiac-specific genes (such as SCN5A, MLC2V, and Kv4.3), and a higher percentage of cardiomyocytes showed longer action potential duration, but electrical stimulation did not affect resting membrane potential or action potential upstroke velocity [41]. Hirt et al. reported that pacing heart tissues engineered with hESC-derived cardiomyocytes at 2 Hz led to enhanced contractile force [42].

3.3. Mechanical Stretch

Földes et al. reported that exposure of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes to cyclic mechanical stretch for 24 hours led to a 1.6-fold increase in cell size, increased mRNA levels of cardiac-specific genes (αMHC, βMHC, and ANF), and better-organized sarcomere structure [43]. Mihic et al. showed that cyclic stretch of 3D cultured hESC-cardiomyocytes increased percentage of cTnT+ cells, led to greater cell elongation, and enhanced connexin expression at cell junctions, as well as leading to more mature calcium handling [44].

3.4. Adrenergic Receptor Stimulation

Földes et al. reported that treatment of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes with phenylephrine (an α-adrenoceptor agonist) for 48 hours led to a 1.8-fold increase in cell size and better-organized sarcomere structure [43].

3.5. Thyroid Hormone Stimulation

Thyroid hormone plays a critical role in cardiac development [45]. Lee et al. reported that triiodothyronine (T3) treatment of mouse ESC-derived cardiomyocytes for 7 days increased expressions of cardiac-specific genes (such as Nkx2.5 and MLC2v) and led to a more adult-like action potential profile and calcium handing [46]. Similarly, Yang et al. found that T3 treatment of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes for 7 days resulted in increased cell size, a 2-fold increase of single cell contractile force associated with faster calcium transient kinetics [47].

3.6. MicroRNA Overexpression

Fu et al. reported that overexpression of microRNA-1 (miR-1, which is highly expressed in adult cardiomyocytes) in hESC-derived cardiomyocytes led to a more mature-like (more hyperpolarized) resting membrane potential associated with increased potassium currents, as well as more mature calcium transient kinetics [48].

3.7. Summary

All the above studies have limitations: no single strategy can solve all the aspects of cell immaturity (Table 1). For example, electrical stimulation can improve functional maturation (action potential, calcium transient, and contraction force), while mechanical stretch increases cell size and sarcomere structure. Therefore, it seems that combination of such strategies may be a better solution for generation of mature cardiac myocytes.

4. Cardiac Subtype Myocyte: Heterogeneity of De Novo Cardiac Myocytes

The heart is composed of different cardiomyocytes (ventricular, atrial, and pacemaker myocytes) with distinct properties corresponding with their function in different parts of the cardiac chambers [49]. Pluripotent stem cells (ESCs and iPSCs) have the potential to give rise to all types of cardiomyocytes, making them a good model system to study cardiac diseases that affect different parts of the heart. However, this also poses a major challenge, because de novo cardiomyocytes obtained with existing protocols from ESC, iPSCs [21], and direct reprogramming [33] are a mixture containing all types of cardiomyocytes. Cell transplantation into the patient ventricles for regenerative therapy of heart failure would require a pure population of ventricular myocytes, and the contamination of pacemaker cells in the cell product will bring the concern for cardiac arrhythmias after transplantation [50]. On the other hand, studies of atrial disease, such as atrial fibrillation, would need a pure population of de novo atrial myocytes for disease modeling and drug testing. A pure population of pacemaker myocytes is required for biological pacemaker therapy of bradycardias. Therefore, development of new methods that allow enrichment of specific subtypes of cardiomyocytes from ESC, iPSCs, or direct reprogramming has been a hot research topic (Table 2).

Table 2: Strategies for cardiac subtype myocytes generation.
4.1. Atrial Myocytes

Zhang et al. reported that 95% of the cardiomyocytes from differentiating hESCs after treatment with Noggin and retinoic acid (RA) had atrial-like action potentials [51]. Devalla et al. reported that treatment of differentiating hESCs with retinoic acid (1 μM) from day 4 to day 7 (after the mesoderm formation stage but before the cardiac progenitor stage) increased atrial-specific gene expression (such as KCNA5, KCNJ3, and NPPA) but decreased expression of ventricular-specific genes (such as MYL2, IRX4, and HEY2) [52]. In addition, RA treatment increased the percentage of atrial myocytes (based on action potential profiles) from 20% in control untreated group to 85% [52].

4.2. Ventricular Myocytes

Zhang et al. found that treatment of differentiating hESCs with Noggin and a RA inhibitor increased the expression of ventricular-specific genes (IRX4 and MLC2v), and 83% of the obtained cardiomyocytes had ventricular-like action potentials [51]. Weng et al. reported a protocol that generates 93–100% ventricular myocytes from different hESC and hiPSC lines based on electrophysiological properties of the cardiomyocyte population [53]. This protocol employs the sequential additions of a ROCK inhibitor, BMP4, Activin A, and IWR-1 (a Wnt inhibitor) in the cell culture, and the resulting ventricular-like cardiomyocytes exhibited typical ventricular ionic currents (, , , and ) [53].

4.3. Pacemaker Myocytes

Kapoor et al. demonstrated that de novo cardiac pacemaker myocytes can be obtained by direct reprogramming of rodent ventricular myocytes via viral delivery of Tbx18, a transcription factor required for embryonic pacemaker tissue development [54]. The translational potential of this work is suggested by preclinical studies carried out with pigs demonstrating that this strategy can be translated to large animals [55]. Jung et al. reported that overexpression of Tbx3 in mouse ESCs promoted their differentiation into pacemaker cells, and in combination of cardiac-specific promoter antibiotic selection, >80% of the obtained cardiomyocytes exhibited a pacemaker-like phenotype [56]. Similarly, Ionta et al. found that overexpression of Shox2, a transcription factor critical for embryonic pacemaker tissue development, in differentiating mouse ESCs resulted in upregulation of pacemaker-specific genes [57]. The obtained pacemaker-like cells exhibited enhanced automaticity and are able to pace adult rat hearts in vivo [57].

5. Summary

Techniques that allow the generation of de novo human cardiac myocytes have revolutionized cardiac research. It is now possible to study heart disease mechanisms and perform drug testing on de novo human cardiac myocytes in culture dishes. Current efforts are focused on improving existing technologies for efficient generation of mature cardiomyocytes that only contain the desired subtype myocytes. With the improved methodologies, de novo human cardiac myocytes would be a powerful tool for medical research.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Veronique Hamel and Kang Cheng contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an operating grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research and a New Investigator Award from Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (to Wenbin Liang).

References

  1. D. Mozaffarian, E. J. Benjamin, A. S. Go et al., “Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. e38–e360, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. E. Bloom, E. T. Cafiero, E. Jané-Llopis et al., The Global Economic Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  3. Z. P. Qureshi, E. Seoane-Vazquez, R. Rodriguez-Monguio, K. B. Stevenson, and S. L. Szeinbach, “Market withdrawal of new molecular entities approved in the United States from 1980 to 2009,” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 772–777, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. V. Pandit, “Ionic mechanisms of atrial action potentials,” in Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside, D. P. J. Zipes, Ed., pp. 309–311, Elsevier, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  5. I. Y. Chen, E. Matsa, and J. C. Wu, “Induced pluripotent stem cells: at the heart of cardiovascular precision medicine,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 333–349, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Srivastava and N. DeWitt, “In vivo cellular reprogramming: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 1386–1396, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. A. Thomson, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, S. S. Shapiro et al., “Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts,” Science, vol. 282, no. 5391, pp. 1145–1147, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. J. Evans and M. H. Kaufman, “Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos,” Nature, vol. 292, no. 5819, pp. 154–156, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Kehat, D. Kenyagin-Karsenti, M. Snir et al., “Human embryonic stem cells can differentiate into myocytes with structural and functional properties of cardiomyocytes,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 407–414, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Xu, S. Police, N. Rao, and M. K. Carpenter, “Characterization and enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 501–508, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Takahashi and S. Yamanaka, “Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 663–676, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Tanaka, S. Tohyama, M. Murata et al., “In vitro pharmacologic testing using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 385, no. 4, pp. 497–502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Zhang, G. F. Wilson, A. G. Soerens et al., “Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. e30–e41, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Ma, L. Guo, S. J. Fiene et al., “High purity human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: electrophysiological properties of action potentials and ionic currents,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 301, no. 5, pp. H2006–H2017, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. L. Mummery, J. Zhang, E. S. Ng, D. A. Elliott, A. G. Elefanty, and T. J. Kamp, “Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyocytes: a methods overview,” Circulation Research, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 344–358, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. V. A. Maltsev, J. Rohwedel, J. Hescheler, and A. M. Wobus, “Embryonic stem cells differentiate in vitro into cardiomyocytes representing sinusnodal, atrial and ventricular cell types,” Mechanisms of Development, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Yang, M. H. Soonpaa, E. D. Adler et al., “Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7194, pp. 524–528, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. J. Kattman, A. D. Witty, M. Gagliardi et al., “Stage-specific optimization of activin/nodal and BMP signaling promotes cardiac differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell lines,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 228–240, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Zhang, M. Klos, G. F. Wilson et al., “Extracellular matrix promotes highly efficient cardiac differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells: the matrix sandwich method,” Circulation Research, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 1125–1136, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Lian, C. Hsiao, G. Wilson et al., “Robust cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells via temporal modulation of canonical Wnt signaling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 27, pp. E1848–E1857, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. W. Burridge, E. Matsa, P. Shukla et al., “Chemically defined generation of human cardiomyocytes,” Nature Methods, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 855–860, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Lian, X. Bao, M. Zilberter et al., “Chemically defined, albumin-free human cardiomyocyte generation,” Nature Methods, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 595–596, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Ieda, J.-D. Fu, P. Delgado-Olguin et al., “Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors,” Cell, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 375–386, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Inagawa, K. Miyamoto, H. Yamakawa et al., “Induction of cardiomyocyte-like cells in infarct hearts by gene transfer of Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5,” Circulation Research, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 1147–1156, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Qian, Y. Huang, C. I. Spencer et al., “In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes,” Nature, vol. 485, no. 7400, pp. 593–598, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Wang, Z. Liu, C. Yin et al., “Stoichiometry of Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5 influences the efficiency and quality of induced cardiac myocyte reprogramming,” Circulation Research, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. Zhou, L. Wang, H. R. Vaseghi et al., “Bmi1 is a key epigenetic barrier to direct cardiac reprogramming,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 382–395, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J.-D. Fu, N. R. Stone, L. Liu et al., “Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts toward a cardiomyocyte-like state,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 235–247, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. M. Jayawardena, B. Egemnazarov, E. A. Finch et al., “MicroRNA-mediated in vitro and in vivo direct reprogramming of cardiac fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes,” Circulation Research, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1465–1473, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Song, Y.-J. Nam, X. Luo et al., “Heart repair by reprogramming non-myocytes with cardiac transcription factors,” Nature, vol. 485, no. 7400, pp. 599–604, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. Muraoka, H. Yamakawa, K. Miyamoto et al., “MiR-133 promotes cardiac reprogramming by directly repressing Snai1 and silencing fibroblast signatures,” EMBO Journal, vol. 33, no. 14, pp. 1565–1581, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. M. Jayawardena, E. A. Finch, L. Zhang et al., “MicroRNA induced cardiac reprogramming in vivo: evidence for mature cardiac myocytes and improved cardiac function,” Circulation Research, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 418–424, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. Cao, Y. Huang, J. Zheng et al., “Conversion of human fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by small molecules,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6290, pp. 1216–1220, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Li, G. Chen, and R. A. Li, “Calcium signalling of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 591, no. 21, pp. 5279–5290, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. X. Yang, L. Pabon, and C. E. Murry, “Engineering adolescence: maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 511–523, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Uosaki, P. Cahan, D. I. Lee et al., “Transcriptional landscape of cardiomyocyte maturation,” Cell Reports, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1705–1716, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Sartiani, E. Bettiol, F. Stillitano, A. Mugelli, E. Cerbai, and M. E. Jaconi, “Developmental changes in cardiomyocytes differentiated from human embryonic stem cells: a molecular and electrophysiological approach,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1136–1144, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Kadota, I. Minami, N. Morone, J. E. Heuser, K. Agladze, and N. Nakatsuji, “Development of a reentrant arrhythmia model in human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cell sheets,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 1147–1156, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. D. Lundy, W.-Z. Zhu, M. Regnier, and M. A. Laflamme, “Structural and functional maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1991–2002, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. S. Nunes, J. W. Miklas, J. Liu et al., “Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes,” Nature Methods, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 781–787, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y.-C. Chan, S. Ting, Y.-K. Lee et al., “Electrical stimulation promotes maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells,” Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 989–999, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. N. Hirt, J. Boeddinghaus, A. Mitchell et al., “Functional improvement and maturation of rat and human engineered heart tissue by chronic electrical stimulation,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 74, pp. 151–161, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. Földes, M. Mioulane, J. S. Wright et al., “Modulation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte growth: a testbed for studying human cardiac hypertrophy?” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 367–376, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Mihic, J. Li, Y. Miyagi et al., “The effect of cyclic stretch on maturation and 3D tissue formation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2798–2808, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. I. Klein and K. Ojamaa, “Thyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 7, pp. 501–509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Y.-K. Lee, K.-M. Ng, Y.-C. Chan et al., “Triiodothyronine promotes cardiac differentiation and maturation of embryonic stem cells via the classical genomic pathway,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1728–1736, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. X. Yang, M. Rodriguez, L. Pabon et al., “Tri-iodo-l-thyronine promotes the maturation of human cardiomyocytes-derived from induced pluripotent stem cells,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 72, pp. 296–304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J.-D. Fu, S. N. Rushing, D. K. Lieu et al., “Distinct roles of microRNA-1 and -499 in ventricular specification and functional maturation of human embryonic stem Cell-Derived cardiomyocytes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 11, Article ID e27417, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. G. Schram, M. Pourrier, P. Melnyk, and S. Nattel, “Differential distribution of cardiac ion channel expression as a basis for regional specialization in electrical function,” Circulation Research, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 939–950, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. J. H. Chong, X. Yang, C. W. Don et al., “Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts,” Nature, vol. 510, no. 7504, pp. 273–277, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Q. Zhang, J. Jiang, P. Han et al., “Direct differentiation of atrial and ventricular myocytes from human embryonic stem cells by alternating retinoid signals,” Cell Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 579–587, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. H. D. Devalla, V. Schwach, J. W. Ford et al., “Atrial-like cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells are a robust preclinical model for assessing atrial-selective pharmacology,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 394–410, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. Z. Weng, C.-W. Kong, L. Ren et al., “A simple, cost-effective but highly efficient system for deriving ventricular cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 1704–1716, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. N. Kapoor, W. Liang, E. Marbán, and H. C. Cho, “Direct conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes to pacemaker cells by expression of Tbx18,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Y.-F. Hu, J. F. Dawkins, H. C. Cho, E. Marbán, and E. Cingolani, “Biological pacemaker created by minimally invasive somatic reprogramming in pigs with complete heart block,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 245, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. J. Jung, B. Husse, C. Rimmbach et al., “Programming and isolation of highly pure physiologically and pharmacologically functional sinus-nodal bodies from pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 592–605, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. V. Ionta, W. Liang, E. H. Kim et al., “SHOX2 overexpression favors differentiation of embryonic stem cells into cardiac pacemaker cells, improving biological pacing ability,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 129–142, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus