Research Article | Open Access
The Alpaca Melanocortin 1 Receptor: Gene Mutations, Transcripts, and Relative Levels of Expression in Ventral Skin Biopsies
The objectives of the present study were to characterize the MC1R gene, its transcripts and the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with coat color in alpaca. Full length cDNA amplification revealed the presence of two transcripts, named as F1 and F2, differing only in the length of their 5′-terminal untranslated region (UTR) sequences and presenting a color specific expression. Whereas the F1 transcript was common to white and colored (black and brown) alpaca phenotypes, the shorter F2 transcript was specific to white alpaca. Further sequencing of the MC1R gene in white and colored alpaca identified a total of twelve SNPs; among those nine (four silent mutations (c.126C>A, c.354T>C, c.618G>A, and c.933G>A); five missense mutations (c.82A>G, c.92C>T, c.259A>G, c.376A>G, and c.901C>T)) were observed in coding region and three in the 3′UTR. A 4 bp deletion (c.224 227del) was also identified in the coding region. Molecular segregation analysis uncovered that the combinatory mutations in the MC1R locus could cause eumelanin and pheomelanin synthesis in alpaca. Overall, our data refine what is known about the MC1R gene and provides additional information on its role in alpaca pigmentation.
Coat color in mammals depends on the synthesis and distribution of the relative amounts of eumelanin and pheomelanin, which are influenced by more than 350 genes . The single exon gene MC1R has recently received much attention it encodes for the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), which is a G-protein coupled receptor  specifically expressed by melanocytes. MC1R is a seven-transmembrane protein that plays a crucial role in melanogenesis stimulation upon binding to its physiological ligand agouti/-MSH [3, 4]. In mammals and birds, increased MC1R activity enhances the production of eumelanin (dark, brown/black pigment), whereas decreased MC1R activity results in the production of pheomelanin (yellow/red pigment) [5, 6]. The MC1R gene was cloned at the beginning of the 1990s and has since been established as a major determinant of skin and hair pigmentation. Great efforts have been made to extensively genotype animals for useful information and associations with different coat color. MC1R has been extensively studied in mammals including mouse , cattle , horse , fox , sheep [10, 11], dog [12–14], rabbit , chicken , fish , and to some extent alpaca [18, 19].
Furthermore, there is a lack of information regarding MC1R molecular segregation, cDNA structure, and expression in different colors, which would reveal the mechanisms behind pigmentation. In this study, we report the cloning and characterization of MC1R full length transcripts and their relative levels of expression in white and colored (black and brown) Peruvian alpaca skin samples using RT-PCR analysis. These results will help to reveal how the MC1R gene is regulated in varying alpaca coat colors.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection and Storage of Skin Biopsies
Skin biopsies from white and colored (brown and black) alpacas were collected in March 2008 by disposable biopsy punch (8 mm diameter) in RNAlater (SIGMA, Germany). Alpacas were from the ILPA-Puno, Quimsachata Experimental Station, Instituto Nacional de Innovacion Agraria (INIA), Peru, which is located at 4300 m.a.s.l. The alpacas analyzed in the present study were part of a previous phenotypic segregation study on coat color inheritance ; these animals were also used for the molecular characterization of the agouti gene .
In respect to other countries, such as the USA and Australia, Peru accounts for about 90% of the worldwide alpaca population; thus this South-American country can be considered the largest reserve of alpaca biological resources in the world. All sampled white alpacas possessed only dark and not blue eyes. Peruvian breeders particularly consider the blue-eyed white phenotype as a defect and/or an undesirable trait and thus these animals are excluded from reproduction . The biopsies were transferred to the School of Environmental Science, the University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy. Subsequently, the biopsies were removed from the RNAlater, blotted with sterile blotting paper, and stored at −196°C (liquid nitrogen) for further analysis. All experiments were approved and performed according to the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Camerino.
2.2. Nucleic Acid Extraction and cDNA Synthesis
Total RNAs from stored skin biopsies were extracted using the RNAeasy fibrous tissue mini kit (Qiagen S.A., Courtaboeuf, France) and treated with RNase-free DNase to remove contaminant genomic DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was also isolated using the DNAeasy tissue kit (Qiagen S.A., Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The quality and quantity of isolated RNA and DNA were measured using a GENESYS 10 UV spectrophotometer (Thermo, USA) and by calculating the ratio of optical density at A260/A280. RNA and DNA integrity were checked using 1.5% formamide-agarose gel electrophoresis and 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. RNA and DNA samples with good quantity and quality were stored at −80°C for further analysis. The first strand cDNA was synthesized using 2 μg of total RNA with 10 pmol OdTm primer (Table 1), 0.5 mM dNTPs, 1 × RT buffer, 20 U RNase inhibitor, and 200 U PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase (Takara Biotech, Japan) in a 20 μL total reaction volume according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction mixture was incubated for 45 min at 50°C and then at 70°C for 15 min; the resulting cDNA was used in coding sequence and 3′UTR amplification. All PCR reactions were carried out using a Perkin-Elmer Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Norwalk, CT, USA).
2.3. Primer Design and PCR Amplification of Full Length cDNAs
Orthologous sequences of the MC1R gene from mammals were retrieved from the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and aligned using EMBL ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk//Tools/clustalw/) to identify conserved regions for the design of primers for coding region amplification. PCR amplification of the complete coding sequence (CDS) was carried out with the forward (MCfw) and reverse (MCR5R1) primers (Table 1). Amplification of MC1R cDNA was performed at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 62°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Next, 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE) was carried out as previously reported by  using the SA, ASA, and reverse MCR5R3 primers (Table 1). The 3′ RACE amplifications were completed using the NSTodt primer and a specific forward primer (MC1RFw) (Table 1). The PCR reaction included an initial denaturation step of 3 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 62°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min 30 sec, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. All PCR amplifications were carried out in a final 50 μL PCR reaction mixture containing 1 × Expand High Fidelity PCR System buffer (1.25 mM MgCl2), 0.3 mM dNTP, 0.3 μmol of each primer, and 3.5 U of Expand High Fidelity enzyme mix (Roche S.p.A., Milan, Italy). To limit the possible PCR artifacts for each analyzed alpaca, three-four white colonies were selected from at least three independent RT-PCR reactions and sequenced on both strands.
2.4. Amplification of the MC1R Coding Sequence from DNA
The amplification of the complete coding sequence was performed using the MCRF3 and MCR5R1 primers (Table 1) in a 50 μL reaction volume containing 1 × Expand High Fidelity PCR buffer (1.25 mM MgCl2), 0.3 mM dNTP, 0.3 μmol of each primer, and 3.5 U Expand High Fidelity enzyme mix (Roche S.p.A., Milan, Italy) with the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 64°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Three white colonies were selected from at least three independent PCR reactions and sequenced on both strands.
2.5. Cloning and Sequencing of the PCR Products
The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose gel. The amplified fragments were gel-eluted using a NucleoSpin gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified products were then ligated into the PGEM-T easy vector system (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Approximately 5 μL of the ligated products was transformed into DH5α E. coli competent cells. Transformed colonies were selected using the blue-white colony screening method and sent to BMR Genomics, Italy, and StarSeq, Germany, for sequencing.
2.6. Sequence Analysis and Alignment
Nucleic acid and protein database searches were performed using BLAST from the NCBI server. The cDNA sequence data were analyzed using DNASTAR 5.0 . Alignment of MC1R protein amino acid sequences proteins was performed using ClustalW . The mRNA motif and secondary structure predictions were performed using RegRNA . In silico functional analysis of missense mutations was obtained using PANTHER  and SNP tool .
2.7. Expression of Alpaca MC1R in Skin and Statistical Analysis
To detect differences between MC1R mRNA expressions in white, black, and brown alpacas, we performed RT-PCR analysis using a pair of MC1R gene-specific primers (MC1RFw and MCR5R2). Equal amounts (2 μg) of total RNA extracted from skin biopsies of white (), black (), and brown () alpacas were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using Takara reverse transcriptase following the manufacturer’s instructions (Takara Biotech, Japan). Synthesized cDNAs were used as templates for RT-PCR reactions with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 40 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 15 s followed by a 7 min incubation at 72°C. A pair of primers (GAPFw and GAPRv) (Table 1) was used to amplify constitutively expressed glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) gene cDNA as an internal control using the PCR conditions mentioned above. Identical volumes of the PCR products were applied to a 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and evaluated by band densitometry using Qscan 3.0 software. All reactions were carried out in three independent experiments. The relative levels of gene expression were analyzed via one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) and are shown as the mean ± SD. Individual mean comparisons were performed using Duncan’s test. Differences of were considered significant. All statistical analysis was carried out using BioEstat v.5.3 .
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Cloning and Characterization of MC1R Transcripts
We performed RACE experiments using total RNA isolated from white and pigmented (brown and black) alpaca. Sequence analysis revealed two types of transcripts hereafter named F1 and F2 of 1810 and 1728 bp, respectively. The F1 and F2 transcripts possess an open reading frame (ORF) of 954 bp, a common 3′UTR of 602 bp, and they differed exclusively in the length of their 5′UTRs of 236 and 154 bp, respectively (Figure 1) (GenBank accession numbers HQ645018 and HQ645019). The 5′UTR of the shorter F2 transcript had an 82 bp deletion at the 152–233 bp position (Figure 1). Blast analysis of the F1 5′UTR against the 2X genome of alpaca in Ensembl showed that this sequence was identical to the corresponding genomic DNA. The main characteristics of F1 are the presence of a predicted internal ribosome binding site (IRES), which mediates translation initiation using an internal ribosome binding mechanism [30, 31], of five TOP regulatory motifs which play a critical role in the translational coordination control mechanism , and of three AUGs. ORFs have been shown to function as cis-acting regulatory signals that are able to moderate expression of the downstream reading frame . The shorter F2 transcript includes a uAUG, an IRES of 28 bp, and three TOP regulatory motifs. The features observed in the F2 5′UTR could portray a nonfunctional mRNA. It has been reported that translation is severely hampered in long 5′UTRs containing AUGs, uORFs, and/or secondary structures . Alternative mRNAs differing only in their 5′UTR are quite common and their expression may be regulated through alternative promoter usage [35, 36]. Interestingly and similarly to alpaca agouti transcripts , MC1R transcripts appear to have color specific expression as F2 transcripts have only been identified in white and not colored alpaca.
The common 3′UTR had a typical polyadenylation signal (AATAAA) followed by an additional 18 bp poly-A tail and eight microRNA seeds (Figure 1) as predicted by RegRNA. The fact that many microRNAs have short, perfect seeds of at least 6–8 bases near the 5′ end of the microRNA that are complementary to sequences within the 3′UTRs that can regulate translation [37–39] is established. 3′UTR elements may also control mRNA subcellular localization, stability, and translation efficiency [40, 41]. Further studies are required to investigate the predicted motif and to validate the regulatory functions of the observed 5′UTRs and 3′UTRs.
3.2. Polymorphisms in MC1R
To analyze MC1R’s association with coat color in Peruvian alpaca, a panel from the segregation analysis of DNA from three different solid colored alpaca (black 17, brown 15, and white 15) was screened for polymorphisms. In our analysis, there were a total of twelve SNPs; among those four were silent mutations (c.126C>A, c.354T>C, c.618G>A, and c.933G>A), five were missense mutations (c.82A>G, c.92C>T, c.259A>G, c.376A>G, and c.901C>T) (Table 2), and three were from the 3′UTR region (c.5T>C, c.166C>T, and c.398G>A) and there was a four-base pair deletion (c.224_227del) (Table 2). Since the mutations resulting in an amino acid sequence change could possibly be causative for coat color variation, a further analysis of the missense mutations was conducted by means of the SNP annotation tools (cSNP and SNAP tool) to evaluate if the identified mutations may produce deleterious effects on the stability and function of the protein (Table 2). Hence the amino acid changing mutations were further considered for the association analysis. The missense mutations observed in the study were genotyped by direct sequencing in our segregation analysis samples and individual genotypes with phenotypes were compared for coat color association. The c.901C>T nucleotide mutation resulting in the p.R301C amino acid change (Table 2) showed significant correlation with the brown phenotypes of our population . A similar type of mutation (C901T or chestnut) was also observed in horse . In our population, 15 out of 17 black animals were homozygous for the C901 mutation and two were heterozygous for C901T. All the brown animals analyzed in the present study were heterozygous for C901T. And 14 out of 15 white animals were homozygous for T901 and one was observed to be heterozygous for C901T. The C-terminus of a GPCR is a functionally important domain involved in ligand receptor complex interactions with G-proteins, placing the receptor within the membrane and providing signals for its intercellular trafficking [43, 44]. Moreover, c.901C>T is near a potential phosphorylation site and mutation of this domain is reported to impair function [43, 44]. Interestingly in our molecular segregation analysis, animals homozygous for the mutation combinations A82/A259/A376/C901 (Table 3) expressed black phenotypes. The combination of G82/G259/G376/T901 mutations was observed (Table 3) to have white phenotypes. Brown phenotypes were observed to have a heterozygous condition for the following observed mutations: A82G/A259G/A376G/C901T. In vitro and in vivo functional analyses are needed to further confirm the effect of combinatorial mutations on phenotypes. In some species there are several alleles at the MC1R locus, with varying effects on phenotypes. A functional MC1R allele can lead to eumelanin production depending upon which allele is present at the agouti locus. Nonfunctional MC1R alleles result in nonblack phenotypes by preventing MSH from binding to MC1R. This loss of function can cause a range of phenotypes from red to as light as white as reported in the black bears . Some species have a dominant black allele that allows MSH to bind to MC1R even in the presence of agouti. In pigs, there are 7 MC1R alleles with 4 distinct phenotypes  and in humans 30 MC1R alleles with only 2 phenotypes have been reported . A similar association has been found between MC1R nonfunctional homozygotes and a red phenotype in many species including horses, dogs, and cattle [7, 12, 47]. Hence, the screening of these mutation combinations may better unveil the MC1R background for the selective breeding of alpaca.
|NA: not applicable.|
3.3. Structure of MC1R
The amino acid sequence deduced from the MC1R cDNA sequence showed an ORF of 954 bp and was found to encode a putative protein containing 317 amino acid (aa) residues with an estimated molecular mass of 35006.95 daltons. The amino acid sequence of alpaca MC1R was compared with other known MC1Rs; the results indicated that the amino acid sequence of alpaca MC1R shared high identity with that of camel, sheep, goat, and cow 97%, 89%, and 88%, respectively (Figure 2).
The hypothetical structure of alpaca MC1R was highly conserved among mammals including the N-terminus, extracellular loops, intracellular loops, transmembrane regions, and the cytosolic C-terminal extension. Comparative analysis of human and alpaca MC1R revealed the position of an N-glycosylation site, a potential phosphorylation target, Cys residues for disulfide bonds, a dileucine-like motif, and a potential acylation site  that were highly conserved. In alpaca, 10 mutations in the CDS have been reported for the MC1R gene ([18, 19] and our study); among those mutations 6 (Table 2) have been reported as amino acid changing mutations. This polymorphic condition within the population shows that alpaca may be under selective pressure and the polymorphisms reported in the locus do not affect the potential posttranslational modification sites (Figure 3). The occurrence of synonymous and nonsynonymous polymorphisms without functional implications at various regions of the gene indicates the maintenance of structural integrity and regulation despite selection pressure. Functional analysis of MC1R with mutations in the potential posttranslational modification site may give more insight into the function behind this.
3.4. MC1R Expression in White, Black, and Brown Alpacas
To identify possible difference(s) between expression levels of MC1R mRNA in white, black, and brown alpacas, a total of 15 randomly chosen animals (5 for each phenotype under study) were analyzed using RT-PCR approaches. A 240 bp MC1R fragment and a 250 bp GAPDH gene fragment were amplified from each of the total RNAs extracted from the white and colored phenotypes; subsequently their expression levels were compared between the phenotypes. Analysis of variance showed that MC1R expression significantly varied with color (Figure 4(a)). The expression levels were comparatively high in black (0.76 ± 0.03), moderate in brown (0.65 ± 0.04), and low in white (0.38 ± 0.04) skin biopsies (Figure 4(b)). This assay shows that MC1R transcript levels are upregulated in the skin of black alpacas. Increased MC1R expression enhances the production of eumelanin, while diminished MC1R activity results in the production of pheomelanin [5, 6]. MC1R is located specifically on melanocyte membranes [2, 48–50] where it functions by switching the type of melanin produced from the red/yellow pheomelanin to the black/brown eumelanin [43, 51]. Our results suggest that eumelanin synthesis is dependent on MC1R expression levels  and may therefore enhance cell sensitivity to melanogenic stimuli.
In conclusion, the genetic dissection of MC1R in alpaca is the first step for development of marker based selection for coat color. The alleles identified in pheomelanic and eumelanic individuals could be used as markers for animal selection in breeding programs. Moreover, the results presented here refine the existing knowledge on the melanogenesis pathway and could also help in understanding its regulatory mechanisms.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors would like to thank the Alpaca Research Foundation (ARF) for their financial support. They would also like to thank INIA, Peru, and people who helped in the sampling and three anonymous reviewers for improving the original paper with helpful suggestions and constructive criticisms.
- L. Montoliu, W. S. Oetting, and D. C. Bennett, In European Society for Pigment Cell Research, 2014, http://www.espcr.org/micemut/.
- K. G. Mountjoy, L. S. Robbins, M. T. Mortrud, and R. D. Cone, “The cloning of a family of genes that encode the melanocortin receptors,” Science, vol. 257, no. 5074, pp. 1248–1251, 1992.
- R. D. Cone, K. G. Mountjoy, L. S. Robbins et al., “Cloning and functional characterization of a family of receptors for the melanotropic peptides,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 680, pp. 342–363, 1993.
- Z. A. Abdel-Malek, M. C. Scott, I. Suzuki et al., “The melanocortin-1 receptor is a key regulator of human cutaneous pigmentation,” Pigment Cell Research, vol. 13, supplement 8, pp. 156–162, 2000.
- L. S. Robbins, J. H. Nadeau, K. R. Johnson et al., “Pigmentation phenotypes of variant extension locus alleles result from point mutations that alter MSH receptor function,” Cell, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 827–834, 1993.
- S. Takeuchi, H. Suzuki, S. Hirose et al., “Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the chick melanocortin 1-receptor gene,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Gene Structure and Expression, vol. 1306, no. 2-3, pp. 122–126, 1996.
- H. Klungland, D. I. Våge, L. Gomez-Raya, S. Adalsteinsson, and S. Lien, “The role of melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) receptor in bovine coat color determination,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 636–639, 1995.
- L. Marklund, M. J. Moller, K. Sandberg, and L. Andersson, “A missense mutation in the gene for melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor (MC1R) is associated with the chestnut coat color in horses,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 895–899, 1996.
- D. I. Våge, D. Lu, H. Klungland, S. Lien, S. Adalsteinsson, and R. D. Cone, “A non-epistatic interaction of agouti and extension in the fox, Vulpes vulpes,” Nature Genetics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 311–315, 1997.
- D. I. Våge, H. Klungland, D. Lu, and R. D. Cone, “Molecular and pharmacological characterization of dominant black coat color in sheep,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 1999.
- D. I. Våge, M. R. Fleet, R. Ponz et al., “Mapping and characterization of the dominant black colour locus in sheep,” Pigment Cell Research, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 693–697, 2003.
- J. M. Newton, A. L. Wilkie, L. He et al., “Melanocortin 1 receptor variation in the domestic dog,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2000.
- D. L. Dreger and S. M. Schmutz, “A new mutation in MC1R explains a coat color phenotype in 2 ‘old’ breeds: saluki and Afghan hound,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 644–649, 2010.
- M. Oguro-Okano, M. Honda, K. Yamazaki, and K. Okano, “Mutations in the melanocortin 1 receptor, β-defensin103 and agouti signaling protein genes, and their association with coat color phenotypes in Akita-inu dogs,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 853–858, 2011.
- L. Fontanesi, E. Scotti, M. Colombo et al., “A composite six bp in-frame deletion in the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene is associated with the Japanese brindling coat colour in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus),” BMC Genetics, vol. 11, article 59, 2010.
- X. L. Guo, X. L. Li, Y. Li et al., “Genetic variation of chicken MC1R gene in different plumage colour populations,” British Poultry Science, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 734–739, 2010.
- A. Tezuka, H. Yamamoto, J. Yokoyama, C. van Oosterhout, and M. Kawata, “The MC1R gene in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): genotypic and phenotypic polymorphisms,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 4, article 31, 8 pages, 2011.
- A. J. Powell, M. J. Moss, L. T. Tree et al., “Characterization of the effect of melanocortin 1 receptor, a member of the hair color genetic locus, in alpaca (Lama pacos) fleece color differentiation,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 79, no. 2-3, pp. 183–187, 2008.
- N. L. Feeley and K. A. Munyard, “Characterisation of the melanocortin-1 receptor gene in alpaca and identification of possible markers associated with phenotypic variations in colour,” Animal Production Science, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 675–681, 2009.
- A. Valbonesi, N. Apaza, V. la Manna, M. L. Gonzales, T. Huanca, and C. Renieri, “Inheritance of white, black and brown coat colours in alpaca (Vicuna pacos L.),” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 16–19, 2011.
- B. Chandramohan, C. Renieri, V. la Manna, and A. la Terza, “The alpaca agouti gene: genomic locus, transcripts and causative mutations of eumelanic and pheomelanic coat color,” Gene, vol. 521, no. 2, pp. 303–310, 2013.
- F. C. Jackling, W. E. Johnson, and B. R. Appleton, “The genetic inheritance of the blue-eyed white phenotype in Alpacas (Vicugna pacos),” Journal of Heredity, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 847–857, 2014.
- X. Shi and D. L. Jarvis, “A new rapid amplification of cDNA ends method for extremely guanine plus cytosine-rich genes,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 356, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2006.
- M. O. Dayhoff, R. M. Schwartz, and B. C. Orcutt, “A model of evolutionary change in proteins,” in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, M. O. Dayhoff, Ed., vol. 5, supplement 3, pp. 345–358, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC, USA, 1978.
- J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson, “CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 4673–4680, 1994.
- H. Y. Huang, C. H. Chien, K. H. Jen, and H. D. Huang, “RegRNA: an integrated web server for identifying regulatory RNA motifs and elements,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, pp. W429–W434, 2006.
- P. D. Thomas, M. J. Campbell, A. Kejariwal et al., “PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function,” Genome Research, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2129–2141, 2003.
- Y. Bromberg and B. Rost, “SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 3823–3835, 2007.
- M. Ayres, M. Ayres Jr., D. L. Ayres, and A. A. Santos, BIOESTAT—Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências bio-médicas, Ong Mamiraua, Belém, Brazil, 2007.
- S. D. Baird, M. Turcotte, R. G. Korneluk, and M. Holcik, “Searching for IRES,” RNA, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1755–1785, 2006.
- S.-Y. Le and J. V. Maizel Jr., “A common RNA structural motif involved in the internal initiation of translation of cellular mRNAs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 362–369, 1997.
- S. Levy, D. Avni, N. Hariharan, R. P. Perry, and O. Meyuhas, “Oligopyrimidine tract at the 5′ end of mammalian ribosomal protein mRNAs is required for their translational control,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 3319–3323, 1991.
- A. P. Geballe and D. R. Morris, “Initiation codons within 5′-leaders of mRNAs as regulators of translation,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 159–164, 1994.
- F. Rouzaud and V. J. Hearing, “Regulatory elements of the melanocortin 1 receptor,” Peptides, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1858–1870, 2005.
- F. Rouzaud, J. P. Annereau, J. C. Valencia, G. E. Costin, and V. J. Hearing, “Regulation of melanocortin 1 receptor expression at the mRNA and protein levels by its natural agonist and antagonist,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 2154–2156, 2003.
- X. H.-F. Zhang and L. A. Chasin, “Computational definition of sequence motifs governing constitutive exon splicing,” Genes & Development, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1241–1250, 2004.
- E. C. Lai, “Predicting and validating microRNA targets,” Genome Biology, vol. 5, no. 9, article 115, 2004.
- D. P. Bartel, “MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function,” Cell, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 281–297, 2004.
- I. Bentwich, “Prediction and validation of microRNAs and their targets,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 26, pp. 5904–5910, 2005.
- D. P. Bratu, B.-J. Cha, M. M. Mhlanga, F. R. Kramer, and S. Tyagi, “Visualizing the distribution and transport of mRNAs in living cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 23, pp. 13308–13313, 2003.
- M. Wickens, D. S. Bernstein, J. Kimble, and R. Parker, “A PUF family portrait: 3′UTR regulation as a way of life,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 150–157, 2002.
- L. Andersson, “Melanocortin receptor variants with phenotypic effects in horse, pig, and chicken,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 994, pp. 313–318, 2003.
- J. C. García-Borrón, B. L. Sánchez-Laorden, and C. Jiménez-Cervantes, “Melanocortin-1 receptor structure and functional regulation,” Pigment Cell Research, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 393–410, 2005.
- J. Sánchez-Más, B. L. Sánchez-Laorden, L. A. Guillo, C. Jiménez-Cervantes, and J. C. García-Borrón, “The melanocortin-1 receptor carboxyl terminal pentapeptide is essential for MC1R function and expression on the cell surface,” Peptides, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1848–1857, 2005.
- K. Ritland, C. Newton, and H. D. Marshall, “Inheritance and population structure of the white-phased ‘Kermode’ black bear,” Current Biology, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 1468–1472, 2001.
- R. A. Sturm, R. D. Teasdale, and N. F. Box, “Human pigmentation genes: identification, structure and consequences of polymorphic variation,” Gene, vol. 277, no. 1-2, pp. 49–62, 2001.
- S. Rieder, S. Taourit, D. Mariat, B. Langlois, and G. Guérin, “Mutations in the agouti (ASIP), the extension (MCIR), and the brown (TYRP1) loci and their association to coat color phenotypes in horses (Equus caballus),” Mammalian Genome, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 450–455, 2001.
- V. Chhajlani and J. E. Wikberg, “Molecular cloning and expression of the human melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor cDNA,” FEBS Letter, vol. 390, no. 2, p. 238, 1996.
- D. W. Roberts, R. A. Newton, K. A. Beaumont, J. Helen Leonard, and R. A. Sturm, “Quantitative analysis of MC1R gene expression in human skin cell cultures,” Pigment Cell Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 76–89, 2006.
- D. W. Roberts, R. A. Newton, and R. A. Sturm, “MC1R expression in skin: is it confined to melanocytes?” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 127, no. 10, pp. 2472–2473, 2007.
- G. Hunt, S. Kyne, K. Wakamatsu, S. Ito, and A. J. Thody, “Nle4DPhe7α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone increases the eumelanin:phaeomelanin ratio in cultured human melanocytes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 83–85, 1995.
Copyright © 2015 Bathrachalam Chandramohan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.