Advances in Condensed Matter Physics

Advances in Condensed Matter Physics / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 428739 |

A. A. J. Al-Douri, M. F. A. Alias, A. A. Alnajjar, M. N. Makadsi, "Electrical and Optical Properties of :H Thin Films Prepared by Thermal Evaporation Method", Advances in Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 2010, Article ID 428739, 8 pages, 2010.

Electrical and Optical Properties of G e 𝑥 S i 𝟏 𝑥 :H Thin Films Prepared by Thermal Evaporation Method

Academic Editor: Gayanath Fernando
Received28 May 2009
Accepted27 Jan 2010
Published27 Apr 2010


Thin a-:H films were grown successfully by fabrication of designated ingot followed by evaporation onto glass slides. A range of growth conditions, Ge contents, dopant concentration (Al and As), and substrate temperature, were employed. Stoichiometry of the thin films composition was confirmed using standard surface techniques. The structure of all films was amorphous. Film composition and deposition parameters were investigated for their bearing on film electrical and optical properties. More than one transport mechanism is indicated. It was observed that increasing substrate temperature, Ge contents, and dopant concentration lead to a decrease in the optical energy gap of those films. The role of the deposition conditions on values of the optical constants was determined. Accordingly, models of the density of states for the :H thin films as pure, doped with 3.5% of Al (p-type) and that doped with 3.5% As (n-type), were proposed.

1. Introduction

Amorphous semiconductor materials have become of more interest in the last three decades because of their physical properties for many applications in the area of optoelectronics, such as the fabrication of solar cells, photoconductors, and other optical devices [1, 2]. One of the interesting compounds in this line is the alloy system of The advantage of this alloy material is the possibility for it to vary its band gap with the germanium concentration x and thus improves its wavelength response [35].

Hydrogenation of such films enhances its quality. Previous studies reported that formation of Si–H and Ge–H bonds leads to a considerable reduction in the density of states of thin films and hence better film performance [69].

Extensive research on hydrogenated amorphous silicon–germanium : films has been carried out using various techniques [4, 5, 1013] for preparing a competitive material in many applications of optoelectronic devices [14, 15].

In this work, alloys of were prepared and thin : films were deposited on glass substrate by thermal evaporation method. The pure material and that doped with Al and As were investigated for their electrical and optical properties. A correlation between the optoelectrical properties and deposited parameters of the films prepared at different value of Ge content in the alloy of was observed. A proposed model for density of states for the pure system : thin film and with doped value of 3.5% of Al and 3.5% As was suggested.

2. Experimental Procedure

Ingots of with x = 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 were prepared in evacuated quartz tubes. Elements of 99.999% purity were used in preparation of the alloys [15]. Amorphous : thin films were fabricated using thermal evaporation method. Different deposition conditions were introduced to prepare the films such as substrate temperature and dopent concentration of Al for p-type and As for n-type hydrogenated thin film.

Film thickness of about 350 nm were grown at a deposition rate of 0.9 nm/s while the average vacuum pressure during the deposition was Torr. The hydrogenation took place in situ by exposing the various fabricated system of to hydrogen plasma under an optimum pressure of 0.17 Torr.

The structure and the composition of the prepared films were determined using X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence and energy dispersive spectroscopy. These confirmed the films stoichiometry. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was employed to observe the existence of various vibrational modes in : films.

Dark dc conductivity for prepared : films was measured as functions of substrate temperatures for various value of (x) of the compound.

Optical transmission spectra of the : films were measured with double-beam Perkin-Elmer Lambda 9 spectrometer within the ranges of (300–2500) nm. The transmission spectra were used to determinate the absorption coefficient the optical energy gap and some optical constants of the prepared thin films. Calculated optical constants are the refractive index extinction coefficient and real and imaginary parts of the dielectric constant of the prepared films using the envelop technique described by Swanepoel [16].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Role of Deposition Parameters on the Dark dc Conductivity

The temperature dependence of dc conductivity was obtained using Stuke’s formula [17]: where is the minimum metallic conductivity, is the activation energy, is the Boltzmann constant, and is the absolute temperature.

Figures 1(a)1(c) exhibit the variation of conductivity with the reciprocal of in the temperature range between 300 and 503 K for various : deposited at different substrate temperatures ( = room temperature (), 373, and 503 K), with different values of These data indicate the existence of more than one conduction mechanism throughout the heating temperature range.

The activation energy of deposited films was deduced from these data. The result of such calculation and the variation of conductivity at room temperature as function of x for film deposited at various substrate temperatures are shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b). The graph indicates a clear dependence of the activation energy on the substrate temperature, and it decreases slightly with increasing The effect of on becomes clearer for x > 0.5, whereas the dark dc conductivity at room temperature () increases strongly with value of x for three values of substrate temperature of the hydrogenated thin film. This may be due to change in the localized states at the band edges of the deposited thin films at higher temperature and the rearrangement of the atoms on the surface of the substrate which lead to films with fewer defect as described by Alias [18]. These illustrations also show that the role of on the activation energy is manifested better for film deposited at room temperature in comparison with film deposited at higher substrate temperature. This might be because the atoms deposited at higher substrate temperature possess enough energy end-up in stable state in the structure of the film. The same tendency was observed by other authors [19, 20].

3.2. Effect of Preparation Conditions on the Optical Energy Gap

The optical absorption coefficient was determined from the transmission spectrum of : thin films prepared under various deposition conditions. The optical energy gaps () of these films have been obtained through using Tauc formula [17, 21]: where is inversely proportional to the film’s amorphousity and is the incident photon energy. The values of depend on the electronic transition nature of the deposited films. The best fit of the data determined a value of 2 for the

Figures 3 and 4 show the change of optical energy gap with film growth parameters (x, doped concentration of Al and As, resp.). From these data one can draw the following observations: decreases with the increase of both Ge content (x) and substrate temperature for both types of dopants. This behavior might be due to the creation of new states within the energy gap as the content of Ge rises in the material [19] further, the films deposited at higher substrate temperature could have lower contents as supposed by Xu et al. [19]. On the other hand films fabricated under such conditions could possess less randomness in their amorphous structures, since better arrangement of the atoms would occur at higher substance temperature, leading to a decrease in the optical energy gaps [17].

The study also indicated a decrease in with the increase of the percentage of the dopant concentration of Al and As. This tendency may be attributed to an elevation in the impurity states within the gap, which causes a shift in Fermi level either toward the valence or conduction band according to the type of the dopant. Such factor could be the main reason for narrowing the optical energy gap for films deposited at higher percentage of the concentration of both types of dopants. Another noticeable observation from Figure 3 is the lower for p-type than that for n-type and pure :. A similar trend was observed by other researchers [19, 22].

3.3. Effect of Deposition Parameters on the Optical Constants

Figures 5(a) and 5(b) illustrate the variation of refractive index and extinction coefficient with different Ge content (x) for pure and doped : thin films. Doping was performed at 503 K with 3.5% As and 3.5% Al. The data show that increases with increasing x for pure and doped thin films. This could result from the increase in the packing density of the films grown with high since the refractive index for Si is smaller than that for Ge. Also the data highlight an increase in as increases for all types of films. This could be due to increase in the absorption coefficient and as a conformation of the data shown in Figures 3 and 4 for decreasing the optical energy gap with an increase in the Ge content ().

Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show the variation of real and imaginary dielectric constants for pure and doped (3.5% As and 3.5% Al) films deposited at 503 K. It could be derived from these data that the increase in Ge content leads to elevation in the value of both and for the three types of thin films.

3.4. Proposed Model for Density of States for Pure and Doped a-Ge0.5Si0.5:H Films

Referring to the data provided above, we suggest a model for the variation of the density of states in the mobility gap. The suggested model is based on a comparison between the values of the dark dc conductivity and the optical energy gap for pure and doped films with 3.5% of As and 3.5% Al. This is shown in Figure 7. Our measurement confirmed that all systems of : thin films doped with Al are p-types whereas those doped with As are n-type. The conductivity activation energy means that the distance between Fermi level with top of the valence or bottom of the conduction bands depends on the type of majority carries (holes or electron). The following observation can be deduced from the data shown in Figure 7:

(i)a reduction in the optical edge from 0.87 eV for pure film to 0.77 eV and 0.75 eV for doped : thin film with 3.5% As and 3.5% Al, respectively;(ii)a shift of Fermi level towards valence band around the value of 0.09 eV for films doped with 3.5% Al, while it is about 0.06 eV toward the conduction band for film doped with 3.5% As;(iii) the width of the tail is the same near the edge of the conduction band and the edge of the valence band That is, The tail width and the density of states variation near Fermi level according to both dopant types and pure film of : are highlighted in Figure 7.

4. Conclusion

Thin : films were grown successfully by fabrication of designated ingot followed by evaporation onto glass slides. Film composition and deposition parameters were investigated for their bearing on film electrical and optical properties. The summary of the study is provided in the following.

The dark conductivity of : thin film increases with the increase of the substrate temperature, dopant concentration of As and Al, as well as with the Ge contents in the grown systems.

The activation energy decreases with both increasing Ge content (x) and the substrate temperature.

The optical energy gap of the hydrogenated amorphous thin film of decreases with both substrate temperature and the percentage of dopant concentration for n- and p-types thin films.

Both the refractive index and the extinction coefficient of : thin films were increased with the value of Note that the values of the and for p-type are higher than those for n-type and pure film deposited at all substrate temperatures. The same trend of behavior was observed for real and imaginary parts of the dielectric constant.

A model has been deduced from the obtained data for density of states for pure and doped : thin film.


  1. D. B. Holt, “The growth and structure of epitaxial films and heterojunctions of II-VI compounds,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–53, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  2. T. M. Razykov, “Physical properties of II-VI binary and multi-component compound films and heterostructures fabricated by chemical vapour deposition,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 164, pp. 301–308, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. Wickboldt, D. Pang, W. Paul et al., “High performance glow discharge a-Si1xGex:H of large x,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 6252–6267, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  4. Y.-P. Chou and S.-C. Lee, “Structural, optical, and electrical properties of hydrogenated amorphous 11 silicon germanium alloys,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 4111–4123, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  5. K. D. MacKenzie, J. R. Eggert, D. J. Leopold, Y. M. Li, S. Lin, and W. Paul, “Structural, electrical, and optical properties of a-Si1xGex:H and an inferred electronic band structure,” Physical Review B, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2198–2212, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. C. Chittick, “Properties of glow-discharge deposited amorphous germanium and silicon,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 255–270, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
  7. D. Malinovska, L. Nedialkova, M. Tzolov, and N. Tzenov, in Proceeding of ISES Solar World Congress, p. 131, Budapest, Hungary, 1993.
  8. P. Wickboldt, D. Pang, W. Paul et al., “High performance glow discharge a-Si1xGex:H of large x,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 6252–6267, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  9. C. F. O. Graeff and I. Chambouleyron, “Structural and optoelectronic properties of Ge-rich hydrogenated amorphous silicon-germanium alloys,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 2473–2478, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. G. Budaguan, A. A. Sherchenkov, A. E. Berdnikov, J. W. Metselaar, and A. A. Aivazov, “The properties of a-SiC:H and a-SiGe:H films deposited by 55 kHz PECVD,” in Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Symposium, vol. 557, pp. 43–48, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. M. Pérez, C. Zuñiga, F. J. Renero, and A. Torres, “Optical properties of amorphous silicon germanium obtained by low-frequency plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition from SiH4+GeF4 and from SiH4+GeH4,” Optical Engineering, vol. 44, no. 4, Article ID 04380, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Fedala, R. Cherfi, M. Aoucher, and T. Mohammed-Brahim, “Structural, optical and electrical properties of hydrogenated amorphous silicon germanium (a-Si1xGex) deposited by DC magnetron sputtering at high rate,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 9, no. 4-5, pp. 690–693, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Yang, A. Banerjee, and S. Guha, “Triple-junction amorphous silicon alloy solar cell with 14.6% initial and 13.0% stable conversion efficiencies,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 70, no. 22, pp. 2975–2977, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. X. Deng, X. Liao, S. Han, H. Povolny, and P. Agarwal, “Amorphous silicon and silicon germanium materials for high-efficiency triple-junction solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. F. A. Alias, N. N. Rammo, and M. N. Makadsi, “Lattice parameter and density of Ge-Si solid solutions,” Renewable Energy, vol. 24, no. 3-4, pp. 347–351, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Swanepoel, “Determination of the thickness and optical constants of amorphous silicon,” Journal of Physics E, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1214–1222, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. Mott and E. Davis, Electronic Process in Non-Crystalline Materials, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 2nd edition, 1979.
  18. M. F. A. Alias, “The influence of the deposition parameters on the conductivity of a-Si:p Thin Films,” Journal of College Education for Women, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 127–132, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  19. J. Xu, S. Miyazaki, and M. Hirose, “High-quality hydrogenated amorphous silicon-germanium alloys for narrow bandgap thin film solar cells,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 208, no. 3, pp. 277–281, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. B. Schubert, H. C. Weller, K. Eberhardt, and G. H. Bauer, “Structural properties of a-Si1xGex:H,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 114, pp. 528–530, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  21. J. Tauc, Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductor, Plenum Press, London, UK, 1974.
  22. A. R. Middya and S. Ray, “Influence of deposition rate and hydrogen/helium dilution on the structural relaxation of a-SiGe:H network prepared at low substrate temperature,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 7340–7348, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 A. A. J. Al-Douri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.