BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Innovative Pharmacological/Therapeutic Approaches against Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 894679 |

Eirini Pantazi, Emma Folch-Puy, Mohamed Bejaoui, Arnau Panisello, Ana Teresa Varela, Anabela Pinto Rolo, Carlos Marques Palmeira, Joan Roselló-Catafau, "PPARα Agonist WY-14643 Induces SIRT1 Activity in Rat Fatty Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 894679, 7 pages, 2015.

PPARα Agonist WY-14643 Induces SIRT1 Activity in Rat Fatty Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Academic Editor: Andrea Ferrigno
Received28 May 2015
Accepted11 Aug 2015
Published11 Oct 2015


Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) remains a frequent complication in surgery, especially in case of steatotic livers that present decreased tolerance towards IRI. Apart from its major role in metabolism, activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) has been related with positive effects on IRI. In addition, the deacetylase enzyme sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) has recently emerged as a promising target for preventing IRI, through its interaction with stress-related mechanisms, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS). Taking this into account, this study aims to explore whether PPARα agonist WY-14643 could protect steatotic livers against IRI through sirtuins and ERS signaling pathway. Obese Zucker rats were pretreated or not pretreated with WY-14643 (10 mg/kg intravenously) and then submitted to partial (70%) hepatic ischemia (1 hour) followed by 24 hours of reperfusion. Liver injury (ALT levels), lipid peroxidation (MDA), SIRT1 activity, and the protein expression of SIRT1 and SIRT3 and ERS parameters (IRE1α, peIF2, caspase 12, and CHOP) were evaluated. Treatment with WY-14643 reduced liver injury in fatty livers, enhanced SIRT1 activity, and prevented ERS. Together, our results indicated that PPARα agonist WY-14643 may exert its protective effect in fatty livers, at least in part, via SIRT1 induction and ERS prevention.

1. Introduction

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a limiting factor for the outcome of many clinical conditions and although the extensive investigations, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear [1]. Moreover, the increased rates of obesity have resulted in the augmented number of livers with severe steatosis [2]. Steatotic livers present an exaggerated accumulation of lipids which contributes to the activation of various cellular stress signaling pathways and finally to increased vulnerability against IRI [3]. Consequently, there is an augmented interest for identifying mechanisms able to reduce IRI in steatotic livers.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) is a nuclear receptor that is highly expressed in metabolically active tissues, such as liver, and functions as a lipid sensor. Upon the binding of various lipids, it forms heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and activates the transcription of various genes that regulate lipid homeostasis and metabolism, including genes involved in mitochondrial β-oxidation, fatty acid uptake and binding, and lipoprotein transport [4]. In fact, PPARα activation is associated with reduced hepatic steatosis [5, 6] through the regulation of a wide variety of genes involved in peroxisomal, mitochondrial, and microsomal fatty acid β-oxidation systems in the liver [7].

Various studies have evidenced the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of PPARα agonists against IRI in various organs; WY-14643 efficiently decreased neutrophil infiltration and proinflammatory cytokine expression (TNF-α and IL-1β) and prevented the formation of ROS [810]. In addition, PPARα has also been associated with the prevention of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), a common feature of IRI [11]. Pretreatment with PPARα agonist WY-14643 protected liver HepG2 cells against ERS-induced apoptosis by downregulating the expression of BiP and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), two components of the ERS-mediated apoptosis pathway. Moreover, ERS has been linked to a number of downstream pathways that contribute to the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [12].

Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase, is involved in numerous physiological processes including cellular stress response, glucose homeostasis, and immune response. In accordance with its role as a metabolic mediator, SIRT1 is known to regulate genes involved in fatty acid oxidation and lipolysis [13]. Among them, PPARα is a well-known factor that is activated by SIRT1 [14, 15]. SIRT1 deletion in hepatocytes impaired the activity of PPARα, resulting in development of hepatic steatosis, whereas SIRT1 hepatic overexpression suppressed the expression of gluconeogenic genes and attenuated obesity-induced ERS [16, 17]. Furthermore, sirtuin 3 (SIRT3), another member of the sirtuin’s family, has also been involved in metabolic regulation [18, 19] and both SIRT1 and SIRT3 have emerged as potential targets to diminish IRI [20].

This study aims to explore new mechanisms by which a PPARα agonist, WY-14643, exerts its beneficial effects against hepatic IRI in a genetic model of obese rats. SIRT1 and ERS signaling appear to be potential targets of WY-14643.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Homozygous obese (Ob) Zucker rats (Charles River, France) aged 16 weeks were used; Ob rats lack the cerebral leptin receptor and are characterized by severe macro- and microvesicular fatty infiltration in hepatocytes. Animals had free access to water and standard laboratory food ad libitum and were kept under constant environmental conditions with a 12-hour light-dark cycle. All procedures were performed under isoflurane inhalation anesthesia. This study was performed in accordance with European Union regulations (Directive 86/609 EEC). Animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committees for Animal Experimentation (CEEA, Directive 396/12), University of Barcelona.

2.2. Experimental Design

Rats were randomly divided into three experimental groups: (1) Sham, ; (2) ischemia-reperfusion (IR), ; and (3) WY-14643 + IR, . A model of partial (~70%) hepatic warm ischemia was applied. Briefly, a midline laparotomy was performed and the portal triad was dissected free of surrounding tissue. Then, an atraumatic clip was placed across the portal vein and hepatic artery to interrupt the blood supply to the left lateral and median lobes of the liver. After 60 min of partial hepatic ischemia, the clip was removed to recover hepatic reperfusion for 24 hours. Sham control rats underwent the same protocol without vascular occlusion. In the group of WY-14643 + IR, rats were treated with WY-14643 (10 mg/kg intravenously) 1 hour before the induction of IR [21]. After 24 h of reperfusion, rats were sacrificed; blood samples were drawn from aorta and ischemic lobes were collected and stored at −80°C until assayed.

2.3. Biochemical Determinations
2.3.1. Transaminases Assay

Hepatic injury was assessed in terms of transaminases levels with a commercial kit from RAL (Barcelona, Spain). Briefly, blood samples were centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min at 3000 rpm and then were kept at −20°C. In order to assay transaminase activity, 200 μL of the supernatant was added to the substrate provided by the commercial kit. ALT levels were determined at 365 nm with an UV spectrometer and calculated following the supplier instructions.

2.3.2. Lipid Peroxidation Assay

Lipid peroxidation in liver was used as an indirect measurement of the oxidative injury induced by ROS. Lipid peroxidation was determined by measuring the formation of malondialdehyde (MDA) with the thiobarbiturate reaction. MDA in combination with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) forms a pink chromogen compound whose absorbance at 540 nm was measured. The result was expressed as nmols/mg protein.

2.3.3. SIRT1 Activity Assay

SIRT1 activity was determined according to the method described by Becatti et al. with some modifications [22]. Protein extracts were obtained using a mild lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, and 0.1% NP40). SIRT1 activity was measured using a deacetylase fluorometric assay kit (CY-1151, CycLex, MBL International Corp.), following the manufacturer’s protocol. A total of 25 μL of assay buffer containing the same quantity of protein extracts (10 μg/μL) was added to all wells, and the fluorescence intensity was monitored every 2 min for 1 h using the fluorescence plate reader Spectramax Gemini, applying an excitation wavelength of 355 nm and an emission wavelength of 460 nm. The results are expressed as the rate of reaction for the first 30 min, when there was a linear correlation between the fluorescence and this period of time.

2.3.4. ATP Quantification

Tissue samples (20 mg) were pulverized in liquid N2 and homogenized in ice-cold 25 μL of KOH buffer (KOH 2.5 M, K2HPO4 1.5 M). Homogenates were then vortexed and centrifuged at 14,000 ×g at 4°C for 2 min. The supernatants were collected and dissolved in 100 μL of K2HPO4 1 M. Following this, pH was adjusted to 7 and samples were frozen at −80°C for posterior use. Finally, adenosine nucleotides were quantified with an ATP bioluminescent assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich) on a Victor 3 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) plate reader.

2.3.5. NAD+/NADH Determination

Hepatic NAD+/NADH levels were quantified with a commercially available kit (MAK037, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. Western Blotting Analysis

Liver tissue was homogenized in RIPA buffer (Tris-HCl pH = 7.5 50 mM, NaCl 150 mM, SDS 0.1%, C24H39O4Na 1%, NP-40 1%, EDTA 5 mM, Na3VO4 1 mM, NaF 50 mM, and DTT 1 mM, 1 complete tablet/100 mL). Fifty μg of proteins was electrophoresed on 8–15% SDS-PAGE gels and transblotted on PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were then blocked with 5% (w/v) nonfat milk in TBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 and incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-SIRT1 (number 07-131, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA); anti-SIRT3 (number 2627), anti-p-eIF2a (Ser51, number 9721), anti-IRE1α (number 3294), and anticaspase 12 (number 2202) were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA), NAMPT (AP22021SU, Acris Antibodies GmbH, Germany), anti-GADD 153 (sc-575, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-GADPH (G9545, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA). After washing, bound antibody was detected after incubation for 1 h at room temperature with the corresponding secondary antibody linked to horseradish peroxidase. Bound complexes were detected using Western Bright ECL-HRP substrate (Advansta) and were quantified using the Quantity One software for image.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Statistical comparison was performed by variance analysis, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test, using the GraphPad Prism software. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. WY-14643 Administration Decreased Hepatic Injury and MDA Levels in Obese Rats

First of all, we aimed to investigate the effect of WY-14643 pretreatment on hepatic injury in obese rats. As shown in Table 1, IR group was associated with increased ALT levels, which was prevented after treatment with WY-14643 (Table 1). In addition, pretreatment with the PPARα agonist decreased the release of lipid peroxidation products as observed for the low MDA levels (Table 2).

ShamIRWY-14643 + IR

97 ± 27,852675 ± 277,03380 ± 86,02

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in plasma after 24 h of reperfusion. Sham: anesthesia and laparotomy, IR: 60 min partial ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion, and WY-14643 + IR: iv administration of WY-14643 (10 mg/kg) 1 hour before IR. versus Sham; versus IR.

ShamIRWY-14643 + IR

0,32 ± 0,071,22 ± 0,130,76 ± 0,17

Photometric analysis of malondialdehyde levels (MDA). Sham: anesthesia and laparotomy, IR: 60 min partial ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion, and WY-14643 + IR: iv administration of WY-14643 (10 mg/kg) 1 hour before IR. versus Sham; versus IR.
3.2. WY-14643 Treatment Increased SIRT1 Activity, While No Effects Were Found on SIRT1 and SIRT3 Protein Expression

It is known that hepatic deletion of SIRT1 alters PPARα signaling, but we then explored whether PPARα activation could affect the protein expression of SIRT1 and SIRT3. No changes on SIRT3 protein expression were observed among all the experimental groups (Figure 1(b)). By contrast, although SIRT1 protein expression increased during ischemia-reperfusion, its levels were not significantly different between IR and WY-14643 pretreated rats (Figure 1(a)). In addition, WY-14643 treatment resulted in enhanced SIRT1 activity in comparison to both Sham and IR group (Figure 1(c)).

3.3. WY-14643 Administration Enhanced NAD+ Levels

Due to the fact that SIRT1 depends on NAD+ levels, we determined the NAD+/NADH levels and the protein expression of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), a well-known mediator of NAD+ biosynthetic pathways. As evidenced in Figure 2(a), both IR and WY-14643 + IR groups showed augmented NAMPT levels when compared to Sham group. Moreover, obese rats submitted to IR presented significant decreases of NAD+/NADH levels in contrast to untreated animals, but WY-14643 contributed to more elevated NAD+ levels than IR group (Figure 2(b)).

3.4. WY-14643 Pretreatment Augmented ATP Levels

As PPARα induces fatty acid oxidation which is a source of ATP production, we then measured ATP levels. We observed that IR significantly decreased ATP levels when compared to Sham group, whereas WY-14643 administration previous to IR provoked an overwhelming increase in ATP levels (Figure 3).

3.5. PPARα Enhancement Decreased ERS

Excessive lipid accumulation in the tissues has been associated with ERS induction [23]. Thus, possible alterations in protein expression of ERS parameters were evaluated. As shown in Figure 4, expression of IRE1α, p-eIF2, caspase 12, and CHOP was exacerbated by IR and restored by pretreatment with the PPARα agonist WY-14643.

4. Discussion

PPARα has gained special interest for its implication in metabolism and its protective effects in IRI models. However, the underlying interactions beyond its activation in obese livers subjected to IRI are not fully understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the hepatoprotective mechanisms of PPARα agonist WY-14643 in a genetic rat model of obesity.

To begin with, pretreatment of obese rats with WY-14643 proved to be protective against hepatic IRI. This result is consistent with other studies using genetic and dietary models of steatohepatitis. In nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and simple steatosis, treatment of mice with WY-14643 protected steatotic livers against IRI [24]. Given the fact that oxidative injury is known to be more exaggerated in fatty livers [3, 25], we also determined lipid peroxidation and we found a significant reduction in MDA formation in the liver of rats pretreated with WY-14643. In this sense, PPARα beneficial effects against oxidative stress have also been demonstrated in other models [26, 27].

Various studies have evidenced the protective role of SIRT1 against IRI, which in most cases has been associated with attenuation of oxidative stress [28, 29]. In the liver, a major target of SIRT1 is the PPARα signaling pathway. Loss of hepatic SIRT1 impairs PPARα mediated fatty acid metabolism and decreases fatty acid β-oxidation [17]. Additionally, cell culture experiments suggested that PPARα may also positively regulate SIRT1 expression [30, 31]. In our study, we observed that WY-14643 administration did not affect either SIRT1 or SIRT3 protein expression, whereas it strengthened SIRT1 activity.

As SIRT1 requires NAD+ for its enzymatic activity, the augmented NAD+ levels that we observed in WY-14643 treated group led us to suggest that SIRT1 enhanced activity may be, at least in part, a result of the increased levels of its cofactor NAD+. However, the fact that NAD+ levels were not in accordance with NAMPT proteins levels may be attributed to the existence of other NAD+ precursors, like tryptophan and nicotinic acid [32].

It has been shown that PPARα stimulates the β-oxidative degradation of fatty acids, provoking thus a high yield of ATP production [33, 34]. Indeed, in our study, we observed that administration of PPARα agonist WY-14643 resulted in overwhelming ATP increases. Fatty livers are characterized by a reduced ATP content, which limits the resistance and the survival of hepatocytes against stress conditions, including IRI [3]. Thus, PPARα activation diminished IRI in fatty livers by enhancing energy production. Furthermore, ATP forms part of the NAD+ biosynthesis pathways [35, 36] and in this way may promote SIRT1 activity.

Various studies have associated steatotic livers with ERS [12, 37]. IR affects the ability of the endoplasmic reticulum to synthesize and fold proteins, leading to the exaggerated accumulation of unfolded proteins and the initiation of ERS. Upon ERS, various proteins localized in the endoplasmic reticulum are activated, such as inositol requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) and pancreatic ER kinase- (PKR-) like ER kinase (PERK). Activated PERK phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) in order to block protein synthesis and activated IRE1α controls genes involved in protein degradation. This consists of a cell attempt to restrain the accumulation of newly synthesized proteins in the ER lumen but can also initiate proapoptotic events, including the activation of caspase 12 and enhanced protein expression of CHOP [38]. Here, we observed that the IRE1α, p-eIF2, and CHOP signaling pathways of the ERS, as well as caspase 12 levels, were significantly abrogated after WY-14643 treatment. Due to the fact that ROS impairs the protein folding, the attenuation of oxidative stress by PPARα activation could contribute to a more proper folding of the proteins and thus to lessened ERS. ERS prevention by PPARα activation has also been evidenced in vitro in H2O2-treated HepG2 cells [11]. Another potential mechanism to prevent ERS might be based on the SIRT1 augmented activity, as SIRT1 hepatocyte loss has been shown to be crucial for the development of ERS in a high-fat diet [16].

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, our study gives a new insight into the hepatoprotective mechanisms of the PPARα agonist WY-14643 in steatotic livers, implying that SIRT1 might be an important mediator of these beneficial effects. However, more efforts are required to elucidate the exact mechanisms that define the observed interactions.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Eirini Pantazi thanks the fellowship from AGAUR (2012FI_B00382), Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. The authors would like to thank the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS PI12/00519) for the economic support.


  1. L. Y. Guan, P. Y. Fu, P. D. Li et al., “Mechanisms of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and protective effects of nitric oxide,” World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 122–128, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. D. Browning and J. D. Horton, “Molecular mediators of hepatic steatosis and liver injury,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 147–152, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Peralta and J. Roselló-Catafau, “The future of fatty livers,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 149–151, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. M. Masternak and A. Bartke, “PPARs in calorie restricted and genetically long-lived mice,” PPAR Research, vol. 2007, Article ID 28436, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Harano, K. Yasui, T. Toyama et al., “Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonist, reduces hepatic steatosis and lipid peroxidation in fatty liver Shionogi mice with hereditary fatty liver,” Liver International, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 613–620, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. Hashimoto, W. S. Cook, C. Qi, A. V. Yeldandi, J. K. Reddy, and M. S. Rao, “Defect in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-inducible fatty acid oxidation determines the severity of hepatic steatosis in response to fastin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 37, pp. 28918–28928, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. K. Reddy, “Nonalcoholic steatosis and steatohepatitis. III. Peroxisomal β-oxidation, PPARα, and steatohepatitis,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 281, no. 6, pp. G1333–G1339, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  8. N. S. A. Patel, R. Di Paola, E. Mazzon, D. Britti, C. Thiemermann, and S. Cuzzocrea, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α contributes to the resolution of inflammation after renal ischemia/reperfusion injury,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 635–643, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Gao and Y.-H. Li, “Antioxidant stress and anti-inflammation of PPARα on warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury,” PPAR Research, vol. 2012, Article ID 738785, 8 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Collino, M. Aragno, R. Mastrocola et al., “Oxidative stress and inflammatory response evoked by transient cerebral ischemia/reperfusion: effects of the PPAR-alpha agonist WY14643,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 579–589, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  11. W.-X. Tang, L.-K. Wang, Y.-Q. Wang et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α activation protects against endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced HepG2 cell apoptosis,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 385, no. 1-2, pp. 179–190, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Pagliassotti, “Endoplasmic reticulum stress in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 32, pp. 17–33, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. T. Rodgers and P. Puigserver, “Fasting-dependent glucose and lipid metabolic response through hepatic sirtuin 1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 31, pp. 12861–12866, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Planavila, R. Iglesias, M. Giralt, and F. Villarroya, “Sirt1 acts in association with PPARα to protect the heart from hypertrophy, metabolic dysregulation, and inflammation,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 276–284, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. A. Khan, A. Sathyanarayan, M. T. Mashek, K. T. Ong, E. E. Wollaston-Hayden, and D. G. Mashek, “ATGL-catalyzed lipolysis regulates SIRT1 to control PGC-1α/PPAR-α signaling,” Diabetes, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 418–426, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Li, S. Xu, A. Giles et al., “Hepatic overexpression of SIRT1 in mice attenuates endoplasmic reticulum stress and insulin resistance in the liver,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1664–1679, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Purushotham, T. T. Schug, Q. Xu, S. Surapureddi, X. Guo, and X. Li, “Hepatocyte-specific deletion of SIRT1 alters fatty acid metabolism and results in hepatic steatosis and inflammation,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 327–338, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. D. Hirschey, T. Shimazu, E. Goetzman et al., “SIRT3 regulates mitochondrial fatty-acid oxidation by reversible enzyme deacetylation,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 121–125, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. S. Teodoro, F. V. Duarte, A. P. Gomes et al., “Berberine reverts hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction in high-fat fed rats: a possible role for SirT3 activation,” Mitochondrion, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 637–646, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Pantazi, M. A. Zaouali, M. Bejaoui, E. Folch-Puy, H. B. Abdennebi, and J. Roselló-Catafau, “Role of sirtuins in ischemia-reperfusion injury,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 19, no. 43, pp. 7594–7602, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Okaya and A. B. Lentsch, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α regulates postischemic liver injury,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 286, no. 4, pp. G606–G612, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Becatti, N. Taddei, C. Cecchi, N. Nassi, P. A. Nassi, and C. Fiorillo, “SIRT1 modulates MAPK pathways in ischemic-reperfused cardiomyocytes,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 69, no. 13, pp. 2245–2260, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. U. Özcan, Q. Cao, E. Yilmaz et al., “Endoplasmic reticulum stress links obesity, insulin action, and type 2 diabetes,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5695, pp. 457–461, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. C. Teoh, J. Williams, J. Hartley, J. Yu, R. S. McCuskey, and G. C. Farrell, “Short-term therapy with peroxisome proliferation-activator receptor-α agonist Wy-14,643 protects murine fatty liver against ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 996–1006, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. K. Mantena, A. L. King, K. K. Andringa, H. B. Eccleston, and S. M. Bailey, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of alcohol- and obesity-induced fatty liver diseases,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1259–1272, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. A. Abdelmegeed, K.-H. Moon, J. P. Hardwick, F. J. Gonzalez, and B.-J. Song, “Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α in fasting-mediated oxidative stress,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 767–778, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. A. Abdelmegeed, S.-H. Yoo, L. E. Henderson, F. J. Gonzalez, K. J. Woodcroft, and B.-J. Song, “PPARα expression protects male mice from high fat-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 603–610, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C.-P. Hsu, P. Zhai, T. Yamamoto et al., “Silent information regulator 1 protects the heart from ischemia/reperfusion,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 21, pp. 2170–2182, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. Pantazi, M. A. Zaouali, M. Bejaoui et al., “Silent information regulator 1 protects the liver against ischemia-reperfusion injury: implications in steatotic liver ischemic preconditioning,” Transplant International, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 493–503, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Hayashida, A. Arimoto, Y. Kuramoto et al., “Fasting promotes the expression of SIRT1, an NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase, via activation of PPARα in mice,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 339, no. 1-2, pp. 285–292, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. Wang, Q. Lin, R. Lin et al., “PPARα agonist fenofibrate attenuates TNF-α-induced CD40 expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes via the SIRT1-dependent signaling pathway,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 319, no. 10, pp. 1523–1533, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Nikiforov, C. Dölle, M. Niere, and M. Ziegler, “Pathways and subcellular compartmentation of NAD biosynthesis in human cells: from entry of extracellular precursors to mitochondrial NAD generation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 24, pp. 21767–21778, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Schoonjans, B. Staels, and J. Auwerx, “The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) and their effects on lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1302, no. 2, pp. 93–109, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Sarma, H. Ardehali, and M. Gheorghiade, “Enhancing the metabolic substrate: PPAR-alpha agonists in heart failure,” Heart Failure Reviews, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. S. Smith, C. B. Brachmann, I. Celic et al., “A phylogenetically conserved NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase activity in the Sir2 protein family,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 6658–6663, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. T. Yang and A. A. Sauve, “NAD metabolism and sirtuins: metabolic regulation of protein deacetylation in stress and toxicity,” The AAPS Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. E632–E643, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  37. X.-Q. Zhang, C.-F. Xu, C.-H. Yu, W.-X. Chen, and Y.-M. Li, “Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1768–1776, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. I. Kim, W. Xu, and J. C. Reed, “Cell death and endoplasmic reticulum stress: disease relevance and therapeutic opportunities,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1013–1030, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Eirini Pantazi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.