BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 8232830 | 16 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8232830

The Evolution of Human Basophil Biology from Neglect towards Understanding of Their Immune Functions

Academic Editor: Oscar Palomares
Received05 Sep 2016
Accepted16 Nov 2016
Published19 Dec 2016

Abstract

Being discovered long ago basophils have been neglected for more than a century. During the past decade evidence emerged that basophils share features of innate and adaptive immunity. Nowadays, basophils are best known for their striking effector role in the allergic reaction. They hence have been used for establishing new diagnostic tests and therapeutic approaches and for characterizing natural and recombinant allergens as well as hypoallergens, which display lower or diminished IgE-binding activity. However, it was a long way from discovery in 1879 until identification of their function in hypersensitivity reactions, including adverse drug reactions. Starting with a historical background, this review highlights the modern view on basophil biology.

1. Introduction

Basophils are well known for their allergic effector function, a feature applied in the basophil activation test. According to current literature basophils are additionally conceived in the center between the innate and adaptive immune responses [1, 2]. The following chapter intends to review the most important findings during the past 150 years of basophil biology.

A Historical Perspective: from Discovery to Recognition as Allergic Effector Cell. In 1879 Ehrlich discovered a cell type with dark blue granula in peripheral blood staining experiments with basic dyes [3, 4], which he named “basophilic granulocytes” or “basophils” according to their unique appearance. He previously had described human mast cells in his doctoral thesis in 1878 [5], thus initially referred to basophils as mast leucocytes or blood mast cells. Shortly thereafter it was found out that they were leucocytes of myeloid origin [6]. In 1894 and 1895, Kanthack and Hardy continued to define the appearance and morphology of mast cells and basophils [7]. They characterized the latter as “the finely granular basophil cell” appearing solely in the blood which was surprisingly accurate. Moreover, they were the first to describe basophils as very unstable and recognized their “explosive nature,” in response to “certain chemical stimuli.” This very basic understanding of basophil biology remained state of knowledge for almost 60 years until the 1950s which may have been due to their low abundance. A significant role of basophils was questioned which pushed them into the position of an “underdog” [811].

During this time, however, descriptions about hypersensitivity reactions in patients emerged including research efforts to elucidate their etiology. Portier and Richet were the first mentioning the term anaphylaxis in 1902 when they found out that dogs became hypersensitive to anemone toxins after repeated injections [12] and Pirquet et al. coined the term “allergy” to describe the immune response in hypersensitivity reactions [1315]. With anaphylatoxin discovered in the serum [16] and histamine shown to be involved in smooth muscle contraction [17] different molecules were proposed as key candidates responsible for such reactions. The following two studies showed that anaphylaxis-triggering molecules must be contained in the blood or serum: Ramirez reported on a case of transmitted hypersensitivity in 1919 when a person got an asthmatic attack after receiving a blood transfusion but had so far no history of hypersensitivity [18]. A similar discovery was made by Prausnitz and Küstner in 1921 [19], when Küstner, who was allergic to fish, locally transferred his allergy to Prausnitz’s skin. The molecules responsible for the reaction, however, were not yet identified. Further on prostaglandins and leukotrienes, slow-reacting substances, with a late reaction onset, were discovered by von Euler et al. in the 1930s [20, 21].

It was in 1934 that a delayed reaction in the skin after repeated injection of a foreign protein was linked to basophils and described as the so-called cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity by Jones and Mote [22]. Five years later, Trager described a similar basophil accumulation in the setting of a tick bite and stated that basophils are crucial for the induction of immune reactions. He claimed that the histamine-induced itching was essential for the detection and removal of the tick [23].

Despite these early reports it took almost 20 years until discoveries in hypersensitivity were linked to basophils and mast cells. It was in 1953 and 1955 when Riley et al. showed that histamine was stored predominantly in basophil granules and suggested that these cells were involved in anaphylaxis [24, 25]. Shelley and Juhlin were the ones who established a test system for detecting histamine release from basophils; the basophil activation test was born. The principle of the first basophil activation tests was based on degranulation monitoring using optical microscopy. Whole blood or leukocytes (enriched by filtration) were subjected to activation stimuli followed by rapid liquid fixation and staining with basic dyes. Reduced levels of granular staining indicated an activation-induced degranulation [26, 27]. Furthermore, Juhlin and Shelley proved that histamine was released from mast cells and basophils [28] by a radio immune assay which was based on binding competition to an anti-histamine antibody between cell-derived histamine in the sample and 125l-labeled histamine. The detailed degranulation mechanism of basophils was finally explained when Ishizaka and Bennich independently identified the serum factor responsible for this immediate reaction in the years from 1966 to 1968 which they agreed to call immunoglobulin (Ig) E. Their experiments were based on the Prausnitz-Küstner reaction (for safety reasons not recommended as involving intradermal serum transfer from an atopic patient to a nonallergic control person) which was blocked by antiserum from fractionated serum of allergic individuals or by myeloma-derived IgE [2931]. Some years later Ishizaka et al. identified receptors for IgE on basophils and mast cells. He described that binding of anti-IgE and receptor aggregation led to the release of histamine from these cells [3234]. Soon after, Kulczycki Jr. et al. showed that IgE was bound with high affinity, and Jarrett and Bazin found out that helminthic parasite infection was the most powerful inducer of IgE. They showed that rats infected with parasites had a strong elevation in their total serum IgE levels [35, 36].

Measuring leukotrienes from supernatants of stimulated basophils by radio immune-assay as alternative to histamine release was pointed out by MacGlashan Jr. et al. in 1986 [37]. Basophil counting and activation monitoring by flow cytometry finally came up in the 1990s when Knol et al. started to utilize activation-induced and degranulation-associated changes on the cell surface. They monitored the appearance of CD63, alias Lamp-3, expressed in intracellular granule membranes, with a fluorescence-labeled monoclonal anti-CD63 detection antibody [38]. The CD63 molecule was previously cloned and analyzed by Metzelaar et al. [39]. The studies by Gibbs et al. in 1996 on IL-4 and IL-13 secretion from basophils [40] were a further milestone for determining the immunological capabilities of basophils. One year later, the chemokine receptor, CCR3, was described to be highly expressed on human blood basophils [41]. Bühring et al. added another important basophil-specific surface antigen in 1999, when he discovered the ectoenzyme CD203c, a versatile marker for basophil identification and activation [42]. In the same year basogranulin was described for the first time following the development and characterization of a basophil-specific antibody, the anti-basogranulin antibody BB1 [43]. Hirai et al. proposed another identification option for basophils for flow cytometry by gating cells with low side scattering which are prostaglandin DP2 receptor CRTH2 (CD294)-positive and CD3-negative [44]. Further activation markers (CD13, CD107a, and CD164) were identified by Hennersdorf et al. [45].

Summing up, during the last decades, our knowledge on basophils drastically increased with the most relevant findings depicted in the timeline of Figure 1. To date, these new findings are utilized for basic and clinical research questions related to gain a deeper insight into the biology of basophils and to develop advanced diagnostic systems for patients suffering from hypersensitivity reactions.

2. Basophil Development

Though mature basophils are extensively studied, the hematopoietic origin of these cells is scarcely understood [46]. As reviewed in detail elsewhere [47, 48], findings in mouse blood cell hematopoiesis suggest basophils to develop from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) via common myeloid progenitors (CMPs), granulocyte-monocyte progenitors (GMPs), and (possibly) granulocyte progenitors (GPs) in the bone marrow [47, 49]. Further development continues in the bone marrow (prebasophil mast cell progenitor, pre-BMC) or in the spleen (basophil mast cell progenitor, BMCPs) (Figure 2) [50, 51]. These cell types further differentiate into basophil progenitors and mature basophils which then are released into the blood stream.

During basophil hematopoiesis several transcription factors play crucial roles in determining the fate of the progenitors towards the fully differentiated basophil. Two central factors in basophil development are the CCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) and GATA binding protein 2 (GATA-2) [51, 52]. The GMP shows high C/EBPα levels and almost no GATA-2. Upregulation of GATA-2 and simultaneous downregulation of C/EBPα directs cell development into the basophil/mast cell progenitor (BMCP) line. Hence, the BMCP has high GATA-2 and intermediate C/EBPα levels. A further decrease of C/EBPα levels directs the cell fate towards mast cell development. Upregulation of C/EBPα expression in BMCPs triggers differentiation into basophil progenitors which show high levels of both C/EBPα and GATA-2.

Several other transcription factors upstream of C/EBPα and GATA-2 were described. Ikaros family zinc finger protein 1 (IKZF1) was shown to negatively regulate basophil development by inhibition of C/EBPα expression [53], whereas STAT5 was shown to enhance basophil development by inducing C/EBPα and GATA-2 expression [50, 54]. Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) was found to act upstream of GATA-2 in Irf8 knockout mice showing reduced levels of basophils. A further target of IRF8 is GATA1 which plays a role in the generation of basophil progenitors and aids the final differentiation step into basophils [55, 56].

Two more factors specifically prime basophils for distinct roles, namely, IL-3 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). Short-term IL-3 treatment of bone marrow-derived cells was shown to direct granulocyte-monocyte progenitors into basophil differentiation. Basophils derived from such an IL-3-induced lineage show high IgE reactivity and, therefore are involved in IgE-mediated acquired immunity [57]. In contrast, basophils derived from progenitors treated with TSLP showed lower responsiveness to IgE/antigen complexes but displayed features of a chronic inflammatory cell response including higher IL-18 and IL-33 receptor expression. These cells are predominantly involved in innate immunity. The balance between basophils derived from either IL-3 or TSLP thus is considered crucial for the type of mediator response [58].

3. The Basophil in the Immune Network

Basophil biology and the basophils’ interplay with other cells are essentially directed by cytokines, chemokines, and other soluble mediators. In the following chapters important molecules involved in different ways of basophil activation and effector functions, basophil adhesion, migration, and survival, and the dual role of basophils in protection against parasites versus pathogenicity are described. An overview of the most relevant surface molecules and secreted substances is shown in Figure 3.

3.1. Basophil Activation

Basophils are best known for their effector function triggered by the release of mediators upon activation. This activation can be mediated by a large number of different molecules such as immunoglobulins, cyto-/chemokines, factors of the complement system, growth factors, bacteria-derived ligands, and proteases interacting with surface receptors (Table 1). The subsequent intracellular signaling pathway leads to release of preformed molecules such as histamine and leukotriene C4 (LTC4), chemotactic factors like the platelet activation factor (PAF) and retinoic acid, basogranulin, cytokines including IL-4, IL-13, IL-6, TNFα, and TSLP, chemokines, and antimicrobial peptides. They are all involved in immediate and late-phase reactions of the immune system and symptoms observed in allergic reactions [59, 60].


ImmunoglobulinsCyto-/chemokines
complement
growth factors
Bacteria-derived products

IgEIL-3fMLF
IgDTSLPMuramyl dipeptide
sIgAIL-25TLR ligands
IgGIL-33Proteases
IL-18
CXCL8/IL-8
Complement
IL-5
GM-CSF
NGF
LIR7

Ig, immunoglobulin; sIg, secretory Ig; IL, interleukin; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin; CXCL, chemokine ligand; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor; NGF, nerve growth factor; LIR, leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor; fMLF, formyl-methionine-phenylalanine; TLR, toll-like receptor.
3.1.1. Activation by Immunoglobulins

IgE. IgE/antigen complexes mediate the cross-linking of high affinity IgE receptors FcεRI on the basophils’ surface by downstream signaling of the Src family kinases Fyn, Lyn, and Syk, with activation of the PI3-kinase and the MEK/ERK pathways (Figure 4). It is the most popular and extensively investigated activating mechanism of basophils [61, 62]. As a consequence, intracellular granules fuse with the cell membrane and preformed mediators [63, 64] are released, and granule membrane molecules like CD11b, CD13, CD63, CD107a, CD107b, CD203c, CD200R, CD300a, and the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) [6567] are translocated to the outer cell surface, the so-called anaphylactic degranulation. Subsequently, mediators like LTC4 are synthesized de novo and secreted. During basophil degranulation the two important Th2 response-driving cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 are secreted. The IL-4 secretion is an immediate response with preformed but also newly synthesized (stored RNA) IL-4, whereas IL-13 secretion occurs after several hours of basophil stimulation. IL-4 plays a crucial role in triggering Th2 cell differentiation from naïve CD4+ T cells and suppresses the harmful Th1 responses [40, 68, 69]. Basophil-derived IL-4 together with IL-6 activates B cells in humoral protective pathogen responses by enhancing their proliferation and immunoglobulin production [70]. Basophil-derived IL-4 also contributes to the upregulation of the C-C chemokine ligand (CCL)11 in fibroblasts, enhancing eosinophil migration [71], to the differentiation of monocytes into M2 macrophages, and to the proliferation and IL-5 production of group 2 innate lymphoid cells [72, 73].

IgD. IgD binds to a so far not further described calcium-mobilizing receptor on basophils and, upon receptor cross-linking, induces antimicrobial, opsonizing, proinflammatory, B cell-stimulatory, and Th2-driving programs, for example, by upregulation of IL-4, IL-13, B cell-activating factor (BAFF), proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), CXCL8, CXCL10, and cathelicidin, but has no influence on histamine release [74].

Secretory IgA. Secretory IgA was shown to provoke basophil activation by histamine and LTC4 release experiments. Activation of the cells was solely observed upon stimulating IL-3 primed basophils with sepharose-immobilized secretory IgA [75]. The effect was potentiated when secretory IgA was immobilized on plastic plates instead of sepharose beads [76].

IgG. Basophils express the IgG receptors FcγRIIA, FcγRIIB, and FcγRIIIB [7779]. Interestingly, the activating FcγRIIA receptor is present only in minute amounts, whereas the inhibitory FcγRIIB receptor is expressed in much higher quantity. Stimulation of basophils with IgG immune complexes, however, did not lead to their activation. Instead, an IgE-mediated response was dampened by IgG binding and this effect was even potentiated in IL-3 primed cells. This dampening effect could be a reason for symptom reduction during immunotherapy in which increased levels of allergen-specific IgG occur [80].

3.1.2. Activation by Cyto-/Chemokines, Complement, and Growth Factors

IL-3. IL-3 was described as a key molecule in priming/activation of basophils. It is crucial for cytokine production, especially of IL-4 and IL-13 following IgE-dependent stimulation, the expression of cell surface antigens, such as CD203c and IL-1 receptor-like 1 (IL1RL1, alias ST2), and releasability of cells [8183]. Basophils themselves release IL-3 during the late-phase response to antigens, thus, apparently creating a positive feedback loop in activation [8486].

Furthermore, IL-3 is crucial for the expansion of basophils and an enhanced response in parasitic infection [87, 88]. Signaling through the IL-3 receptor is very similar to IgE receptor signaling and comprises the PI3-kinase/Akt/mTOR, the MEK/ERK, and the JAK/STAT pathway [65]. The overall importance and versatility of IL-3 in basophil biology will be elaborated further in the following chapters of this review.

TSLP. Incubation of basophils with thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) leads to a significant increase of histamine, IL-4, and IL-13 and CD203c upregulation. TSLP thus is an activation enhancer of human basophils. Neutralizing antibodies against the TSLP receptor prevent basophils from releasing IL-4 and IL-13 and inhibit CD203c upregulation. Moreover, activation by TSLP depends on an IL-3 receptor component, hence, on the IL-3-specific activation pathway, contributing to IL-3 production of basophils and high surface expression of CCR3 [89].

IL-25 and IL-33. During infection with parasites, viruses, or exposure to allergens, alarmin cytokines like IL-33 and IL-25 are important initiators of Th2 responses [90]. Human basophils express receptors for IL-25 (IL-17RB) and IL-33 (ST2) and priming of the cells with IL-3 as well as IgE-mediated activation upregulates receptor expression [9194]. Basophils stimulated with IL-33 activate the NFκB and p38 MAP-kinase pathways and secrete type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, and IL-13). Both CD203c and IL-3 receptor alpha expressions were upregulated upon activation of IL-25 or IL-33 [91, 92, 94, 95]. Besides, basophils secrete IL-25 upon IgE challenge [96] and IL-33 is able to upregulate the expression of leptin receptors on the basophil surface which can induce degranulation and cytokine synthesis [97].

IL-18. Although human basophils express the receptor for IL-18, a stimulation capability of this cytokine could not be observed in humans [98].

CXCL8/IL-8. CXCL8/IL-8 activates basophils by binding to its receptor on the cell surface in an IgE-independent manner and independent of pretreatment with IL-3. This was shown by Krieger et al. who measured the transient rise of cytosolic free calcium concentrations after activation of basophils by IL-8 [99].

Complement. Various other natural ligands promote basophil activation including the complement products C5a and C3a and the chemokines CCL2, CCL3, or CCL5. The complement products C3a and C5a, also called anaphylatoxins, have the ability to induce histamine and LTC4 release from human basophils. IL-3 is necessary for C3a-mediated but not for C5a-mediated histamine release, whereas LTC4 only is released in combination with IL-3 [100]. Activation of basophils with the combination of C5a and IL-3 is also able to stimulate the release of IL-4 and IL-13 [101]. The signaling pathway of C3a and C5a is initiated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) which are also involved in the basophil activation via CCL2, CCL3, and CCL5 [102, 103].

IL-5 and GM-CSF. IL-5 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have been shown to contribute to basophil activation in combination with other agonists which induce histamine and LTC4 release suggesting synergistic effects. GM-CSF has a higher potency to add to histamine release compared to IL-5, whereas LTC4 production is more affected by IL-5. The underlying mechanisms relate to IL-5, rendering basophils more responsive to the anaphylatoxin C5a [104] and GM-CSF, rendering basophils more sensitive to the anaphylatoxin C3a [105]. Signaling of GM-CSF and IL-5 is very similar to that of IL-3 as they share the common signal-transducing beta-chain [106108].

NGF. Human basophils even can be coactivated by nerve growth factor (NGF) as they have tyrosine protein kinase receptors (Trk) A on their cell surface. Together with IL-5, NGF can prime basophils to release LTC4 [109] and NGF can directly stimulate IL-13 secretion in human basophils [110]. Gibbs et al. investigated the effects of IL-3 and NGF on the release of histamine, IL-4, and IL-13 from human basophils and found that both had the same potential in enhancing histamine and IL-13 release and, to a lower extent, the IL-4 release in basophils primarily activated in an IgE-dependent way. In addition, high levels of NGF induced cytokine release from basophils via an IgE-independent route [111].

LIR7. Another receptor expressed on the surface of human basophils is leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor (LIR) 7 which is coupled to the common Fc receptor gamma chain. Monoclonal antibody-based receptor cross-linking induced the release of histamine, LTC4, and IL-4 [112].

3.1.3. Activation by Bacteria-Derived Products

Formyl-Methionine-Phenylalanine (fMLF). fMLF is an N-formylated tripeptide that is derived from gram-negative bacteria. It is a potent chemotactic factor for leukocytes that have the formyl peptide receptor (FPR)-1, which is the most prominent one of this receptor family, on their surface [113]. Basophils express FPR-1, 2, and 3, of which FPR-1 binds fMLF with high affinity, whereas FPR-2 is a low affinity receptor for fMLF. Upon stimulation of the cells with fMLF a signal cascade is triggered involving receptor phosphorylation, which inhibits further activation of the same receptor. The phosphorylation signal induces the release of proinflammatory mediators and triggers chemotaxis. FPR-2 and FPR-3 are mainly involved in chemotaxis to pathogen-derived molecules, for example, the Helicobacter pylori-derived peptide [114].

Muramyl Dipeptide. Recently, the intracellular pattern recognition receptor nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) was identified in the cytosol of basophils [115]. NOD2 is the receptor for muramyl dipeptide, a specific structure of bacterial peptidoglycans [116]. Hence, the route via NOD-like receptors (NLRs) may constitute another avenue for activation by bacterial substances.

TLR Ligands. Pathogens from bacteria, viruses, and fungi are recognized by immune cells via toll-like receptors (TLRs) located on the cell surface or within cellular endosomes. So far, 13 different TLRs have been identified. TLR1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10 mRNA and/or protein expression was identified in human basophils [117123]. Basophils reacted to TLR2 stimulation with peptidoglycan by secreting the cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 but neither histamine nor LTC4 were released [118]. High concentrations of LPS, ligand for TLR4, enhanced CD63 surface expression and histamine release from basophils of atopic patients in combination with allergen stimulation [120]. Stimulating basophils with the TLR5 ligand flagellin enhanced IL-6 secretion from the basophils [123]. Simultaneous stimulation of the high affinity IgE receptor and TLR4 or TLR9 synergistically upregulated IL-4, CXCL8, IL-13, and CCL5 secretion [124]. Moreover, an elevated CXCL8 secretion was observed in allergic individuals upon TLR1/2 and TLR2/6 stimulation [122]. These findings suggest a connection between the pathogen-induced basophil activation and an allergic response of basophils.

3.1.4. Activation by Proteases

Basophils may react to proteases via direct sensing of the protease activity. This circumstance earns special attention as some of the most common allergens are proteases. One famous candidate is the house dust mite allergen Der p 1 which was able to induce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 production from basophils independently from the presence or absence of IgE [125]. However, signaling comprises similar activation pathways compared to IgE-mediated activation. This was confirmed by a study using bone marrow-derived murine basophils which, upon direct activation by the cysteine protease papain, produced the Th2-inducing cytokines IL-4, IL-6, and TNFα via PI3-kinase and ERK pathways [68]. Pretreatment of such protease antigens with protease inhibitors diminished their ability to activate basophils [125].

3.2. Basophil Adhesion and Migration
3.2.1. Adhesion

In addition to its versatile roles in all kinds of basophil responses, IL-3 also induces integrin CD11b expression and therefore is involved in the adhesion of basophils to vascular endothelial cells. GM-CSF and IL-5 share similar properties in basophil adhesion, however, with lower potential to induce integrin CD11b expression [126, 127]. Stimulation of the cells with IL-33 induced CD11b expression on basophils and enhanced eotaxin (CCL11)-directed chemotaxis via the basophil surface receptor CCR3 [128]. Moreover, P-selectin, CD49d, CD49e, CD49f, and CCR7 all have been identified on the basophil surface and are involved in the IL-3-mediated rolling and adhesion of basophils to endothelial cells [129].

3.2.2. Migration

Upon adherence of the basophils to the cells of the vessel walls they first have to transmigrate across the endothelial cell layer followed by breaking through the basement membrane (transbasement membrane migration, TBMM) to reach the site of inflammation. Transendothelial migration (TEM) of basophils was mediated and directed mainly by eotaxin, the chemokine ligand of CCR3, and CCL5, the chemokine ligand of both CCR1 and CCR3, in freshly isolated cells. Differently, in basophils cultured for 24 hours SDF-1 induced strong migration responses via binding to CXCR4 on the basophil surface. Interestingly, IL-3 again has an additive effect in eotaxin-mediated TEM. Adhesion molecules involved in TEM of basophils are the β2 integrins leukocyte function antigen-1 (LFA, alias alpha-L/beta-2, or CD11a/CD18) and macrophage-1 antigen (Mac-1, alias alpha-M/beta-2, or CD11b/CD18), and the β1 integrin very late antigen 4 (VLA-4, alias alpha-4/beta-1, or CD49d/CD29). Eotaxin- or IL-3-stimulated basophils showed TEM which was mainly depending on the β1 integrins and their endothelial ligand VCAM-1 [130133].

In contrast to TEM, chemokines had no effect on TBMM of resting basophils. However, in presence of IL-3, CXCL8 (via CXCR1) and CCL5 (via CCR1 and CCR3) were able to induce TBMM [134]. The same was observed with the lipid mediators 5-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid and PAF. IL-3 presumably positively affects the expression of the β2 integrin and surface matrix metalloproteinase MMP-9 which cooperatively help basophils to cross the basement membrane [130, 131, 134].

Interestingly, basophils migrated upon IgE stimulation and FcεRI cross-linking. This migratory effect was even observed at minimum amounts of stimulant without triggering basophil degranulation and histamine release. The same effect was observed upon activation with Der f 2 in Dermatophagoides farinae-allergic donors [135].

3.3. Basophil Survival and Apoptosis

The foremost known cytokine prolonging basophil survival is IL-3. In trypan blue staining experiments, this cytokine was reported to prolong the lifespan of cultured basophils from maximum three days up to several weeks [136]. The survival-prolonging effect was observed even at minute amounts of IL-3 and shown to be much more potent than IL-5 or GM-CSF, two other cytokines with effect on basophil survival [127]. Moreover, stem cell factor (SCF) was shown to boost the survival effects of IL-3 [137] and also IL-25 binding to its receptor inhibits basophil apoptosis as measured by annexin V staining [91].

In contrast, human basophils express the death receptors CD95, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptors (TRAIL-R)1, and TRAIL-R2 and treatment with an anti-CD95 antibody significantly increased apoptosis in basophils [98, 138]. Glucocorticoids, too, were shown to induce apoptosis in basophils and this apoptotic effect is considered responsible for their anti-inflammatory properties [139]. Antiallergic and antiasthmatic drugs also have apoptotic effects on basophils, as shown by olopatadine and theophylline treatment of purified human basophils. Besides, their apoptotic capacity even overruled survival prolonging effects of low doses of IL-3 [140].

3.4. Basophils as Antigen-Presenting Cells?

A number of studies performed on mouse basophils came to the conclusion that basophils are potent antigen-presenting cells. Soon after, doubts arose as others could not confirm the postulated antigen-presenting role in birch pollen-allergic patients. In coculture experiments of T cells with APCs but not with basophils T cell proliferation was determined upon allergen treatment [141] and fluorescence-labeled Bet v 1, used to detect internalization of allergen by basophils, was neither internalized, processed, nor presented [142]. The antigen-presenting effects observed in the original publication most likely were due to contamination of purified basophils with dendritic cells [143].

3.5. Protective Functions of Basophils
3.5.1. Ectoparasites

Starting from the above-mentioned experiments with ticks performed by Trager [23] in the late 1930s, it was later shown that hosts can develop resistance to ticks by impairing engorgement and reducing viability of the parasite [144]. Infiltration of basophils to the feeding site was observed in guinea pigs and mice, and considered essential for tick resistance, as it was reduced upon basophil ablation [145, 146].

Basophils have also been shown to infiltrate sites infected by Sarcoptes scabiei (scabies) mites. A protective role of basophils against these mites has been deduced from a patient lacking eosinophils and basophils who was suffering from an extensive scabies manifestation [147, 148].

3.5.2. Helminths

Typically, helminth infection induces activation of Th2 cells, eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, and type 2 innate lymphoid cells plus high serum IgE levels [149]. Several mouse models have been developed in which the roles of basophils in helminth infections were studied. Infection with the nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis induced sensitization of basophils which prevented secondary infection in mast cell-depleted mice [150, 151]. Another study showed that trapping of N. brasiliensis larvae in the skin depends on basophils which activated M2 macrophages by secreting IL-4. Migration of the larvae to the lung and intestine thus was impeded [152]. Adult N. brasiliensis worms were actively expelled presumably upon IgE-mediated receptor cross-linking of basophils and downstream IL-4/IL-13-dependent mechanisms [153].

A strong basophil-induced Th2 response resulted in the formation of granulomas absorbing toxic egg products and prevented surrounding tissue damage in Schistosoma mansoni infection [149]. In this case basophils were activated by IL-4-inducing principle of Schistosoma eggs/α1 (IPSE/α1). This major immunogenic trematode egg glycoprotein induces IL-4 secretion from basophils by binding nonspecifically to cell-bound IgE [154].

3.5.3. Parasitic Protozoa

The role of basophils in infections by protozoa like Leishmania, Toxoplasma, Trypanosoma, or Plasmodium (malaria) is scarcely investigated. Plasmodia were shown to induce increased levels of histamine in the serum of infected patients [155] but elevated basophil counts were not observed [156]. In severe malaria cases basophil responsiveness, as determined by CD203c upregulation, was increased compared to mild infections [157]. In mouse studies high basophil counts protected from cerebral malaria and increased CD41 surface expression indicated basophil activation [149, 158, 159].

3.5.4. Respiratory Bacteria

Basophils were postulated to contribute to antibacterial defense in the upper respiratory tract of Haemophilus influenzae- and Moraxella catarrhalis-infected patients via an IgD-dependent mechanism. Monoclonal IgD bound to beads was used to stimulate the release of proinflammatory and antimicrobial mediators from basophils of healthy donors, and the resulting supernatant prevented microbe replication [74, 160].

3.6. Basophils and Disease
3.6.1. Hypersensitivity

Basophils are best known for their role in eliciting hypersensitivity reactions including immediate, late-phase, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Allergen cross-linking leads to release of histamine, LTC4, and PAF, key molecules of the immediate type reaction leading to typical signs of allergy ranging from itch to the life-threatening anaphylaxis [161]. Six to 12 hours after the immediate response, late-phase reactions like allergic rhinitis and asthma occur. Basophils infiltrate the affected tissues and through IL-4 secretion promote a Th2 environment [162, 163]. Also in delayed hypersensitivity reactions basophils are suggested to play a pivotal role in sustaining a Th2 milieu through IL-4 and IL-13 release [161, 164].

3.6.2. Autoimmunity

Basophils may contribute to the development of lupus nephritis as patients showed higher basophil responsiveness than controls determined by CD203c upregulation. Concomitantly, serum levels of autoreactive anti-nuclear IgE correlated with disease severity. Using Lyn−/− lupus nephritis mice, autoreactive IgE-activated basophils promoted a Th2 environment which led to disease aggravation via enhanced autoantibody production [165, 166].

3.6.3. Malignancy

Increased numbers of basophils have been observed in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, and basophilia was associated with a reduced overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes [167169].

4. Basophil Activation Test

The basophil activation test or BAT is an in vitro method used to diagnose hypersensitivity reactions of patients. In BAT the basophils are identified by flow cytometry via distinct basophil surface molecules like CCR3, recently determined as one of the most robust basophil identification methods [170]. Other identification strategies use anti-CD123+/HLA-DR- or anti-CRTH2+/anti-CD3-, as mentioned above, or staining of IgE bound to FcεRI on the basophil surface [171]. Latter method, however, might potentially interfere with the activation pathway of the cells.

Next to identification, basophil activation can be measured via CD63 or CD203c upregulation. CD203c is a highly specific basophil molecule [172]. Both molecules are upregulated upon cross-linking of the FcεRI by allergen-IgE complexes and therefore used to detect the activation of donor basophils upon allergen stimulation in clinical diagnosis by BAT [173]. As reviewed by Hoffmann et al. [174, 175] BAT is successfully used to diagnose IgE-mediated allergies, for example, in food, hymenoptera venom, latex, and inhalant allergies. A more distinct view has to be drawn when analyzing allergies/hypersensitivities to drugs (DHRs). Suitability of BAT as a biomarker for diagnosis of immediate DHRs has been evaluated recently as a safe and, at least for some DHRs, reliable method. However, provocation testing is still of uttermost importance in clinical evaluation [176].

4.1. Basophil Activation Test as a Tool for Characterization of Hypoallergens

In a number of reports basophils derived from allergic donors have been used for characterization of recombinant hypoallergens in the format of BAT using the activation markers CD63 or CD203c [177185]. The decreased allergenic capacities of the hypoallergens have been evaluated in different ways though. One reliable way of calculating the hypoallergenic factor with good reproducibility is depicted in Figure 5. The hypoallergenic factor can be determined in an analytical way from the ratio of the concentrations of half-maximal basophil activation (C50 values) of allergen versus hypoallergen, which can be achieved by approximating the experimentally determined activation values to a sigmoidal curve using, for example, the Solver add-in of Microsoft Excel™ based on the following formula: = bottom + (top − bottom)/ [178].

An alternative approach for characterizing recombinant allergens [186, 187], hypoallergens [178, 188], allergenic extracts [178], and other allergy-related research purposes including the investigation of drug hypersensitivity reactions [189, 190] has been pursued by the use of “humanized” rat basophil leukemic cells, that were established about a decade ago and express the human high affinity IgE receptor chains [191].

5. Concluding Remarks

Even though they have been first described long ago, human basophils have just recently undergone an amazing development in the investigation of the functional roles in the context of the human immune system. Panels of cyto-/chemokines secreted and receptors expressed have been described. Moreover, an extensive array of other molecules including immunoglobulins, cyto-/chemokines, factors of the complement system, bacterial compounds, and growth factors have been shown to influence the activation state of basophils. A rise from being conceived as “underdogs” [192], shortly hyped as antigen-presenting cells, currently arrived at a solid and well-established role in allergy diagnosis [174] characterized the evolution of human basophils’ biology.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Markus Steiner, Sara Huber, Andrea Harrer, and Martin Himly were involved in the concept, literature screening, and writing of the article.

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Grant P18820-B13.

References

  1. M. Daëron, “Innate myeloid cells under the control of adaptive immunity: the example of mast cells and basophils,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 38, pp. 101–108, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. J. Galli and M. Tsai, “Mast cells in allergy and infection: versatile effector and regulatory cells in innate and adaptive immunity,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1843–1851, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Ehrlich, “Ueber die specifischen Granulationen des Blutes,” in Verhandlungen der Berliner Physiologischen Gesellschaft: Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie: Physiologische Abteilung, pp. 517–579, 1879. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. Ehrlich, “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der granulirten Bindegewebszellen und der eosinophilen Leukocyten,” in Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie: Physiologische Abteilung, Verhandlungen der Berliner Physiologischen Gesellschaft, pp. 166–169, 1879. View at: Google Scholar
  5. P. Ehrlich, Beiträge zur theorie und praxis der histologischen färbung [Thesis], Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 1878.
  6. D. Ribatti, B. Nico, E. Crivellato, and M. Artico, “Development of the blood-brain barrier: a historical point of view,” Anatomical Record - Part B New Anatomist, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. A. Kanthack and W. B. Hardy, “The Morphology and distribution of the wandering cells of mammalia,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 80–119, 1894. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Ehrlich, “Demonstration eines leukämischen Blutpräparates,” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 46, pp. 670–671, 1883. View at: Google Scholar
  9. U. Blank, F. H. Falcone, and G. Nilsson, “The history of mast cell and basophil research—some lessons learnt from the last century,” Allergy, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 1093–1101, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Crivellato, B. Nico, and D. Ribatti, “The history of the controversial relationship between mast cells and basophils,” Immunology Letters, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. C. Siracusa, B. S. Kim, J. M. Spergel, and D. Artis, “Basophils and allergic inflammation,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 789–801, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. Portier and C. Richet, “De l'action anaphylactique de certain venins,” Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Societe de Biologie, vol. 54, pp. 170–172, 1902. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Arthus, “Injections répétées de sérum de cheval chez le lapin,” Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie et de ses Filiales, vol. 55, pp. 817–820, 1903. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. Pirquet and B. Schick, Die Serumkrankheit, F. Deutike, 1905.
  15. C. Pirquet, Allergie, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1910.
  16. E. Friedberger, “Theorien über die Anaphylaxie,” Zeitschrift für Immunitätsforschung und Experimentelle Therapie, vol. 2, pp. 246–253, 1909. View at: Google Scholar
  17. H. H. Dale and P. P. Laidlaw, “Further observations on the action of β-iminazolylethylamine,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 182–195, 1911. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. A. Ramirez, “Horse asthma following blood trasnfusion: report on a case,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 73, no. 13, pp. 984–985, 1919. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Prausnitz and H. Küstner, “Studien über die Überempfindlichkeit,” Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, vol. 86, pp. 160–169, 1921. View at: Google Scholar
  20. U. S. von Euler, “On the specific vaso-dilating and plain muscle stimulating substances from accessory genital glands in man and certain animals (prostaglandin and vesiglandin),” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 213–234, 1936. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W. Feldberg and C. H. Kellaway, “Liberation of histamine and formation of lysocithin-like substances by cobra venom,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 187–226, 1938. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. D. Jones and J. R. Mote, “The phases of foreign protein sensitization in human beings,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 210, no. 3, pp. 120–123, 1934. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. Trager, “Acquired immunity to ticks,” The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 57–81, 1939. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. F. Riley and G. B. West, “The presence of histamine in tissue mast cells,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 528–537, 1953. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. T. Graham, O. H. Lowry, F. Wheelwright, M. A. Lenz, and H. H. Parish Jr., “Distribution of histamine among leukocytes and platelets,” Blood, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 467–481, 1955. View at: Google Scholar
  26. W. B. Shelley and L. Juhlin, “Functional cytology of the human basophil in allergic and physiologic reactions: technic and atlas,” Blood, vol. 19, pp. 208–216, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  27. W. B. Shelley, “Methods of observing the basophil leucocyte degranulation response,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, pp. 427–435, 1963. View at: Google Scholar
  28. L. Juhlin and W. B. Shelley, “Detection of histamine by a new fluorescent omicron-phthalaldehyde stain,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 525–528, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. Ishizaka and T. Ishizaka, “Physicochemical properties of reaginic antibody: I. Association of reaginic activity with an immunoglobulin other than γA- or γG-globulin,” Journal of Allergy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 169–185, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Ishizaka and T. Ishizaka, “Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 1187–1198, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  31. H. H. Bennich, K. Ishizaka, S. G. Johansson, D. S. Rowe, D. R. Stanworth, and W. D. Terry, “Immunoglobulin E: a new class of human immunoglobulin,” Immunology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 323–324, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  32. K. Ishizaka, H. Tomioka, and T. Ishizaka, “Mechanisms of passive sensitization. I. Presence of IgE and IgG molecules on human leukocytes,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1459–1467, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
  33. H. Tomioka and K. Ishizaka, “Mechanisms of passive sensitization. II. Presence of receptors for IgE on monkey mast cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 971–978, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  34. T. Ishizaka, R. De Bernardo, H. Tomioka, L. M. Lichtenstein, and K. Ishizaka, “Identification of basophil granulocytes as a site of allergic histamine release,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1000–1008, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. Kulczycki Jr., C. Isersky, and H. Metzger, “The interaction of IgE with rat basophilic leukemia cells. I. Evidence for specific binding of IgE,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 600–616, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. Jarrett and H. Bazin, “Elevation of total serum IgE in rats following helminth parasite infection,” Nature, vol. 251, no. 5476, pp. 613–614, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  37. D. W. MacGlashan Jr., S. P. Peters, J. Warner, and L. M. Lichtenstein, “Characteristics of human basophil sulfidopeptide leukotriene release: releasability defined as the ability of the basophil to respond to dimeric cross-links,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 2231–2239, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  38. E. F. Knol, F. P. J. Mul, H. Jansen, J. Calafat, and D. Roos, “Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 328–338, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. J. Metzelaar, P. L. J. Wijngaard, P. J. Peters, J. J. Sixma, H. K. Nieuwenhuis, and H. C. Clevers, “CD63 antigen. A novel lysosomal membrane glycoprotein, cloned by a screening procedure for intracellular antigens in eukaryotic cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 5, pp. 3239–3245, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  40. B. F. Gibbs, H. Haas, F. H. Falcone et al., “Purified human peripheral blood basophils release interleukin-13 and preformed interleukin-4 following immunological activation,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2493–2498, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Uguccioni, C. R. Mackay, B. Ochensberger et al., “High expression of the chemokine receptor CCR3 in human blood basophils. Role in activation by eotaxin, MCP-4, and other chemokines,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 1137–1143, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H.-J. Bühring, P. J. Simmons, M. Pudney et al., “The monoclonal antibody 97A6 defines a novel surface antigen expressed on human basophils and their multipotent and unipotent progenitors,” Blood, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 2343–2356, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  43. A. R. McEuen, M. G. Buckley, S. J. Compton, and A. F. Walls, “Development and characterization of a monoclonal antibody specific for human basophils and the identification of a unique secretory product of basophil activation,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  44. H. Hirai, K. Tanaka, O. Yoshie et al., “Prostaglandin D2 selectively induces chemotaxis in T helper type 2 cells, eosinophils, and basophils via seven-transmembrane receptor CRTH2,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 193, no. 2, pp. 255–261, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. F. Hennersdorf, S. Florian, A. Jakob et al., “Identification of CD13, CD107a, and CD164 as novel basophil-activation markers and dissection of two response patterns in time kinetics of IgE-dependent upregulation,” Cell Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 325–335, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. F. H. Falcone, H. Haas, and B. F. Gibbs, “The human basophil: a new appreciation of its role in immune responses,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 13, pp. 4028–4038, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  47. H. Sasaki, D. Kurotaki, and T. Tamura, “Regulation of basophil and mast cell development by transcription factors,” Allergology International, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. K. Oetjen, M. Noti, and B. S. Kim, “New insights into basophil heterogeneity,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 549–561, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. H. Iwasaki and K. Akashi, “Myeloid lineage commitment from the hematopoietic stem cell,” Immunity, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 726–740, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. X. Qi, J. Hong, L. Chaves et al., “Antagonistic regulation by the transcription factors C/EBPα and MITF specifies basophil and mast cell fates,” Immunity, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 97–110, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Y. Arinobu, H. Iwasaki, M. F. Gurish et al., “Developmental checkpoints of the basophil/mast cell lineages in adult murine hematopoiesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 50, pp. 18105–18110, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Iwasaki, S.-I. Mizuno, Y. Arinobu et al., “The order of expression of transcription factors directs hierarchical specification of hematopoietic lineages,” Genes and Development, vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 3010–3021, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. N. Rao, C. Smuda, G. D. Gregory, B. Min, and M. A. Brown, “Ikaros limits basophil development by suppressing C/EBP-α expression,” Blood, vol. 122, no. 15, pp. 2572–2581, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Li, X. Qi, B. Liu, and H. Huang, “The STAT5-GATA2 pathway is critical in basophil and mast cell differentiation and maintenance,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 194, no. 9, pp. 4328–4338, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. H. Sasaki, D. Kurotaki, N. Osato et al., “Transcription factor IRF8 plays a critical role in the development of murine basophils and mast cells,” Blood, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 358–369, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. Y. Nei, K. Obata-Ninomiya, H. Tsutsui et al., “GATA-1 regulates the generation and function of basophils,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 46, pp. 18620–18625, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. K. Ohmori, Y. Luo, Y. Jia et al., “IL-3 induces basophil expansion in vivo by directing granulocyte-monocyte progenitors to differentiate into basophil lineage-restricted progenitors in the bone marrow and by increasing the number of basophil/mast cell progenitors in the spleen,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 2835–2841, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. M. C. Siracusa, S. A. Saenz, D. A. Hill et al., “TSLP promotes interleukin-3-independent basophil haematopoiesis and type 2 inflammation,” Nature, vol. 477, no. 7363, pp. 229–233, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. Mukai, K. Matsuoka, C. Taya et al., “Basophils play a critical role in the development of IgE-mediated chronic allergic inflammation independently of T cells and mast cells,” Immunity, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 191–202, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. E. Schneider, N. Thieblemont, M. L. De Moraes, and M. Dy, “Basophils: new players in the cytokine network,” European Cytokine Network, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 142–153, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. C. L. Kepley, B. S. Wilson, and J. M. Oliver, “Identification of the FcϵRI-activated tyrosine kinases Lyn, Syk, and Zap-70 in human basophils,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 304–315, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. P. Bruhns and F. Jönsson, “Mouse and human FcR effector functions,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 25–51, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. M. Dvorak, “Ultrastructural studies of human basophils and mast cells,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1043–1070, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. G. Marone, C. Stellato, A. Renda, and A. Genovese, “Anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids and cyclosporin A on human basophils,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. S17–S20, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. P. Valent, “Basophil activation antigens: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications,” The Open Allergy Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. V. Sabato, M. M. Verweij, C. H. Bridts et al., “CD300a is expressed on human basophils and seems to inhibit IgE/FcεRI-dependent anaphylactic degranulation,” Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 132–138, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. I. Shiratori, M. Yamaguchi, M. Suzukawa et al., “Down-regulation of basophil function by human CD200 and human herpesvirus-8 CD200,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 7, pp. 4441–4449, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. L. Sokol, G. M. Barton, A. G. Farr, and R. Medzhitov, “A mechanism for the initiation of allergen-induced T helper type 2 responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 310–318, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. Rodriguez Gomez, Y. Talke, C. Hofmann et al., “Basophils control T-cell responses and limit disease activity in experimental murine colitis,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 188–199, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. A. Denzel, U. A. Maus, M. R. Gomez et al., “Basophils enhance immunological memory responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 733–742, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. C. Nakashima, A. Otsuka, A. Kitoh et al., “Basophils regulate the recruitment of eosinophils in a murine model of irritant contact dermatitis,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 100–107.e12, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. S. Kim, K. Wang, M. C. Siracusa et al., “Basophils promote innate lymphoid cell responses in inflamed skin,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 193, no. 7, pp. 3717–3725, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Y. Motomura, H. Morita, K. Moro et al., “Basophil-derived interleukin-4 controls the function of natural helper cells, a member of ILC2s, in lung inflammation,” Immunity, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 758–771, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. K. Chen, W. Xu, M. Wilson et al., “Immunoglobulin D enhances immune surveillance by activating antimicrobial, proinflammatory and B cell-stimulating programs in basophils,” Nature Immunology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 889–898, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. M. Iikura, M. Yamaguchi, T. Fujisawa et al., “Secretory IgA induces degranulation of IL-3-primed basophils,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 1510–1515, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  76. M. Iikura, M. Yamaguchi, M. Miyamasu et al., “Secretory IgA-mediated basophil activation. II. Roles of GTP-binding regulatory proteins and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 575–579, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. L. Kepley, J. C. Cambier, P. A. Morel et al., “Negative regulation of FcεRI signaling by FcγRII costimulation in human blood basophils,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 337–348, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. C. T. Cady, M. S. Powell, R. J. Harbeck et al., “IgG antibodies produced during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy mediate inhibition of basophil activation via a mechanism involving both FcγRIIA and FcγRIIB,” Immunology Letters, vol. 130, no. 1-2, pp. 57–65, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. N. Meknache, F. Jönsson, J. Laurent, M.-T. Guinnepain, and M. Daëron, “Human basophils express the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored low-affinity IgG receptor FcγRIIIB (CD16B),” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 2542–2550, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. L. Cassard, F. Jönsson, S. Arnaud, and M. Daëron, “Fcγ receptors inhibit mouse and human basophil activation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 6, pp. 2995–3006, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. A. Didichenko, N. Spiegl, T. Brunner, and C. A. Dahinden, “IL-3 induces a Pim1-dependent antiapoptotic pathway in primary human basophils,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 3949–3958, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. E. Ono, M. Taniguchi, N. Higashi et al., “CD203c expression on human basophils is associated with asthma exacerbation,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 483.e3–489.e3, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. P. Valent, “Interleukin-33: a regulator of basophils,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1396–1397, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. G. Marone, F. Borriello, G. Varricchi, A. Genovese, and F. Granata, “Basophils: historical reflections and perspectives,” Chemical Immunology and Allergy, vol. 100, pp. 172–192, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  85. E. F. Knol and B. F. Gibbs, “Editorial: Basophil survival and immunomodulatory function are uniquely regulated by a novel MyD88-dependent pathway,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 753–755, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  86. A. W. Hauswirth, K. Sonneck, S. Florian et al., “Interleukin-3 promotes the expression of E-NPP3/CD203C on human blood basophils in healthy subjects and in patients with birch pollen allergy,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 267–278, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  87. T. Herbst, J. Esser, M. Prati et al., “Antibodies and IL-3 support helminth-induced basophil expansion,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 37, pp. 14954–14959, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. C. S. Lantz, B. Min, M. Tsai, D. Chatterjea, G. Dranoff, and S. J. Galli, “IL-3 is required for increases in blood basophils in nematode infection in mice and can enhance IgE-dependent IL-4 production by basophils in vitro,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 1134–1142, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. B. M. Salter, J. P. Oliveria, G. Nusca et al., “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin activation of basophils in patients with allergic asthma is IL-3 dependent,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1636–1644, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. C. Cayrol and J.-P. Girard, “IL-33: an alarmin cytokine with crucial roles in innate immunity, inflammation and allergy,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 31, pp. 31–37, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. H. Wang, R. Mobini, Y. Fang et al., “Allergen challenge of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis increases IL-17RB, which regulates basophil apoptosis and degranulation,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1194–1202, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. D. Smithgall, M. R. Comeau, B. R. Yoon, D. Kaufman, R. Armitage, and D. E. Smith, “IL-33 amplifies both Th1- and Th2-type responses through its activity on human basophils, allergen-reactive Th2 cells, iNKT and NK cells,” International Immunology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1019–1030, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. T. Pecaric-Petkovic, S. A. Didichenko, S. Kaempfer, N. Spiegl, and C. A. Dahinden, “Human basophils and eosinophils are the direct target leukocytes of the novel IL-1 family member IL-33,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1526–1534, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. B. M. Salter, J. P. Oliveria, G. Nusca et al., “IL-25 and IL-33 induce Type 2 inflammation in basophils from subjects with allergic asthma,” Respiratory Research, vol. 17, article 5, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. L. Blom, B. C. Poulsen, B. M. Jensen, A. Hansen, and L. K. Poulsen, “IL-33 induces IL-9 production in human CD4+ T cells and basophils,” PLOS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, Article ID e21695, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. Y.-H. Wang, P. Angkasekwinai, N. Lu et al., “IL-25 augments type 2 immune responses by enhancing the expansion and functions of TSLP-DC-activated Th2 memory cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 8, pp. 1837–1847, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. M. Suzukawa, H. Nagase, I. Ogahara et al., “Leptin enhances survival and induces migration, degranulation, and cytokine synthesis of human basophils,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 9, pp. 5254–5260, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Florian, K. Sonneck, M. Czerny et al., “Detection of novel leukocyte differentiation antigens on basophils and mast cells by HLDA8 antibodies,” Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1054–1062, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. M. Krieger, T. Brunner, S. C. Bischoff et al., “Activation of human basophils through the IL-8 receptor,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 149, no. 8, pp. 2662–2667, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  100. Y. Kurimoto, A. L. De Weck, and C. A. Dahinden, “Interleukin 3-dependent mediator release in basophils triggered by C5a,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 467–479, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. S. Eglite, K. Pluss, and C. A. Dahinden, “Requirements for C5a receptor-mediated IL-4 and IL-13 production and leukotriene C4 generation in human basophils,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 2183–2189, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. H. Ali, “Regulation of human mast cell and basophil function by anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a,” Immunology Letters, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. S. C. Bischoff, M. Krieger, T. Brunner et al., “RANTES and related chemokines activate human basophil granulocytes through different G protein-coupled receptors,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 761–767, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. S. C. Bischoff, T. Brunner, A. L. De Weck, and C. A. Dahinden, “Interleukin 5 modifies histamine release and leukotriene generation by human basophils in response to diverse agonists,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 172, no. 6, pp. 1577–1582, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. S. C. Bischoff, A. L. De Weck, and C. A. Dahinden, “Interleukin 3 and granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor render human basophils responsive to low concentrations of complement component C3a,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 17, pp. 6813–6817, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. A. F. Lopez, J. M. Eglinton, A. B. Lyons et al., “Human interleukin-3 inhibits the binding of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-5 to basophils and strongly enhances their functional activity,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. A. F. Lopez, A. B. Lyons, J. M. Eglinton et al., “Specific binding of human interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to human basophils,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 85, no. 1, part 1, pp. 99–102, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. A. Mire-Sluis, L. A. Page, M. Wadhwa, and R. Thorpe, “Evidence for a signaling role for the α chains of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-3 (IL-3), and IL-5 receptors: divergent signaling pathways between GM-CSF/IL-3 and IL-5,” Blood, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 2679–2688, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  109. B. Bürgi, U. H. Otten, B. Ochensberger et al., “Basophil priming by neurotrophic factors. Activation through the trk receptor,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 157, no. 12, pp. 5582–5588, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  110. A. Z. Sin, E. M. Roche, A. Togias, L. M. Lichtenstein, and J. T. Schroeder, “Nerve growth factor or IL-3 induces more IL-13 production from basophils of allergic subjects than from basophils of nonallergic subjects,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 387–393, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. B. F. Gibbs, D. Zillikens, and J. Grabbe, “Nerve growth factor influences IgE-mediated human basophil activation: functional properties and intracellular mechanisms compared with IL-3,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 735–747, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. D. E. Sloane, N. Tedla, M. Awoniyi et al., “Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors: novel innate receptors for human basophil activation and inhibition,” Blood, vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 2832–2839, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. Y. Li and D. Ye, “Molecular biology for formyl peptide receptors in human diseases,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 781–789, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. A. de Paulis, N. Montuori, N. Prevete et al., “Urokinase induces basophil chemotaxis through a urokinase receptor epitope that is an endogenous ligand for formyl peptide receptor-like 1 and -like 2,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 9, pp. 5739–5748, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. C. Wong, I. Chu, K. Hon, M. Tsang, and C. Lam, “Aberrant expression of bacterial pattern recognition receptor NOD2 of Basophils and microbicidal peptides in atopic dermatitis,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 471, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. T. A. Kufer, D. J. Banks, and D. J. Philpott, “Innate immune sensing of microbes by Nod proteins,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1072, pp. 19–27, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. I. Sabroe, E. C. Jones, L. R. Usher, M. K. B. Whyte, and S. K. Dower, “Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 in human peripheral blood granulocytes: a critical role for monocytes in leukocyte lipopolysaccharide responses,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 9, pp. 4701–4710, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. A. P. Bieneman, K. L. Chichester, Y.-H. Chen, and J. T. Schroeder, “Toll-like receptor 2 ligands activate human basophils for both IgE-dependent and IgE-independent secretion,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 295–301, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. A. Komiya, H. Nagase, S. Okugawa et al., “Expression and function of toll-like receptors in human basophils,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 140, S1, pp. 23–27, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. E. Gyimesi, F. Gönczi, M. Szilasi, G. Pál, S. Baráth, and S. Sipka, “The effects of various doses of bacterial lipopolysaccharide on the expression of CD63 and the release of histamine by basophils of atopic and non-atopic patients,” Inflammation Research, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 213–218, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. T. Watanabe, K. Yamashita, T. Sakurai et al., “Toll-like receptor activation in basophils contributes to the development of IgG4-related disease,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 247–253, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. M. Steiner, T. Hawranek, M. Schneider et al., “Elevated toll-like receptor-induced CXCL8 secretion in human blood basophils from allergic donors is independent of toll-like receptor expression levels,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 2, Article ID e0149275, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. J. H. Jeon, K. B. Ahn, S. K. Kim, J. Im, C.-H. Yun, and S. H. Han, “Bacterial flagellin induces IL-6 expression in human basophils,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 168–176, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. J. Suurmond, J. N. Stoop, F. Rivellese, A. M. Bakker, T. W. J. Huizinga, and R. E. M. Toes, “Activation of human basophils by combined toll-like receptor- and FcεRI-triggering can promote Th2 skewing of naive T helper cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 386–396, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. C. Phillips, W. R. Coward, D. I. Pritchard, and C. R. A. Hewitt, “Basophils express a type 2 cytokine profile on exposure to proteases from helminths and house dust mites,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 165–171, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. B. S. Bochner, A. A. McKelvey, S. A. Sterbinsky et al., “IL-3 augments adhesiveness for endothelium and CD11b expression in human basophils but not neutrophils,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 145, no. 6, pp. 1832–1837, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  127. C. Yoshimura-Uchiyama, M. Yamaguchi, H. Nagase et al., “Comparative effects of basophil-directed growth factors,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 201–206, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. M. Suzukawa, M. Iikura, R. Koketsu et al., “An IL-1 cytokine member, IL-33, induces human basophil activation via its ST2 receptor,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 9, pp. 5981–5989, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. L. H. K. Lim, M. M. Burdick, S. A. Hudson, F. B. Mustafa, K. Konstantopoulos, and B. S. Bochner, “Stimulation of human endothelium with IL-3 induces selective basophil accumulation in vitro,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 9, pp. 5346–5353, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. M. Iikura, M. Ebisawa, M. Yamaguchi et al., “Transendothelial migration of human basophils,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 8, pp. 5189–5195, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. M. Yamaguchi, R. Koketsu, M. Suzukawa, A. Kawakami, and M. Iikura, “Human basophils and cytokines/chemokines,” Allergology International, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. M. Iikura, M. Miyamasu, M. Yamaguchi et al., “Chemokine receptors in human basophils: inducible expression of functional CXCR4,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  133. R. P. Andrews, C. L. Kepley, L. Youssef, B. S. Wilson, and J. M. Oliver, “Regulation of the very late antigen-4-mediated adhesive activity of normal and nonreleaser basophils: roles for Src, Syk, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 776–782, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  134. M. Suzukawa, A. Komiya, M. Iikura et al., “Trans-basement membrane migration of human basophils: role of matrix metalloproteinase-9,” International Immunology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1575–1583, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. M. Suzukawa, K. Hirai, M. Iikura et al., “IgE- and FcεRI-mediated migration of human basophils,” International Immunology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1249–1255, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. M. Yamaguchi, K. Hirai, Y. Morita et al., “Hemopoietic growth factors regulate the survival of human basophils in vitro,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 322–329, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. A. Heinemann, G. J. Sturm, M. Ofner et al., “Stem cell factor stimulates the chemotaxis, integrin upregulation, and survival of human basophils,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 820–826, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. A. Förster, F. H. Falcone, B. F. Gibbs et al., “Anti-Fas/CD95 and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) differentially regulate apoptosis in normal and neoplastic human basophils,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 835–842, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. C. Yoshimura, M. Miyamasu, H. Nagase et al., “Glucocorticoids induce basophil apoptosis,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 215–220, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. A. Kawakami, M. Suzukawa, R. Koketsu et al., “Enhancement of basophil apoptosis by olopatadine and theophylline,” Allergy and Asthma Proceedings, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 322–328, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. J. Eckl-Dorna, A. Ellinger, K. Blatt et al., “Basophils are not the key antigen-presenting cells in allergic patients,” Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 601–608, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. C. Kitzmüller, B. Nagl, S. Deifl et al., “Human blood basophils do not act as antigen-presenting cells for the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1,” Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 593–600, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. D. M. Duriancik and K. A. Hoag, “Mistaken identity: purified basophils likely contaminated with dendritic cells,” Cytometry Part A, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 570–572, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. S. K. Wikel, “Host immunity to ticks,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. J. R. Allen, “Tick resistance: basophils in skin reactions of resistant guinea pigs,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 195–200, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. T. Wada, K. Ishiwata, H. Koseki et al., “Selective ablation of basophils in mice reveals their nonredundant role in acquired immunity against ticks,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 8, pp. 2867–2875, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. Y. Ito, T. Satoh, K. Takayama, C. Miyagishi, A. F. Walls, and H. Yokozeki, “Basophil recruitment and activation in inflammatory skin diseases,” Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1107–1113, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. L. Juhlin and G. Michaëlsson, “A new syndrome characterised by absence of eosinophils and basophils,” The Lancet, vol. 309, no. 8024, pp. 1233–1235, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. J. U. Eberle and D. Voehringer, “Role of basophils in protective immunity to parasitic infections,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 605–613, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. C. Ohnmacht and D. Voehringer, “Basophil effector function and homeostasis during helminth infection,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 12, pp. 2816–2825, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. C. Ohnmacht and D. Voehringer, “Basophils protect against reinfection with hookworms independently of mast cells and memory Th2 cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 344–350, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. K. Obata-Ninomiya, K. Ishiwata, H. Tsutsui et al., “The skin is an important bulwark of acquired immunity against intestinal helminths,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 210, no. 12, pp. 2583–2595, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. C. Schwartz, A. Turqueti-Neves, S. Hartmann, P. Yu, F. Nimmerjahn, and D. Voehringer, “Basophil-mediated protection against gastrointestinal helminths requires IgE-induced cytokine secretion,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 48, pp. E5169–E5177, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. G. Schramm, K. Mohrs, M. Wodrich et al., “Cutting edge: IPSE/alpha-1, a glycoprotein from Schistosoma mansoni eggs, induces IgE-dependent, antigen-independent IL-4 production by murine basophils in vivo,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 10, pp. 6023–6027, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. C. O. Enwonwu, B. M. Afolabi, L. O. Salako, E. O. Idigbe, and N. Bashirelahi, “Increased plasma levels of histidine and histamine in falciparum malaria: relevance to severity of infection,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 1273–1287, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. H. Haroon, P. A. Fazel, M. Naeem, A. Mobin, A. H. Naqvi, and K. Makki, “Hide and seek: hematological aspects of malaria—a developing country perspective,” Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 273–279, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. S. Pelleau, S. Diop, M. Dia Badiane et al., “Enhanced basophil reactivities during severe malaria and their relationship with the Plasmodium falciparum histamine-releasing factor translationally controlled tumor protein,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 2963–2970, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. S. E. Bopp, E. Rodrigo, G. E. González-Páez et al., “Identification of the Plasmodium berghei resistance locus 9 linked to survival on chromosome 9,” Malaria Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, article 316, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. N. Bakocevic, C. Claser, S. Yoshikawa et al., “CD41 is a reliable identification and activation marker for murine basophils in the steady state and during helminth and malarial infections,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1823–1834, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. K. Chen and A. Cerutti, “The function and regulation of immunoglobulin D,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 345–352, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. J. L. Cromheecke, K. T. Nguyen, and D. P. Huston, “Emerging role of human basophil biology in health and disease,” Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, vol. 14, article 408, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. C. L. Kepley, P. J. McFeeley, J. M. Oliver, and M. F. Lipscomb, “Immunohistochemical detection of human basophils in postmortem cases of fatal asthma,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 1053–1058, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. T. Gentinetta, T. Pecaric-Petkovic, D. Wan et al., “Individual IL-3 priming is crucial for consistent in vitro activation of donor basophils in patients with chronic urticaria,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 1227.e5–1234.e5, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. E. B. Brandt and U. Sivaprasad, “Th2 cytokines and atopic dermatitis,” Journal of Clinical & Cellular Immunology, vol. 2, no. 3, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. N. Charles, D. Hardwick, E. Daugas, G. G. Illei, and J. Rivera, “Basophils and the T helper 2 environment can promote the development of lupus nephritis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 701–707, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  166. N. Warde, “Lupus nephritis: activated basophils exacerbate lupus nephritis by amplifying production of autoreactive IgE,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 438, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  167. C. F. Hoyle, P. D. Sherrington, P. Fischer, and F. G. J. Hayhoe, “Basophils in acute myeloid leukaemia,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 785–792, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  168. H. Yasuda, N. Aritaka, J. Ando, M. Hirama, N. Komatsu, and T. Hirano, “Chronic myelogenous leukemia with mild basophilia as the predominant manifestation at presentation,” Internal Medicine, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 501–502, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  169. F. Wimazal, U. Germing, M. Kundi et al., “Evaluation of the prognostic significance of eosinophilia and basophilia in a larger cohort of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes,” Cancer, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 2372–2381, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  170. O. V. Hausmann, T. Gentinetta, M. Fux, S. Ducrest, W. J. Pichler, and C. A. Dahinden, “Robust expression of CCR3 as a single basophil selection marker in flow cytometry,” Allergy, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  171. B. Eberlein, R. Hann, S. Eyerich et al., “Optimizing of the basophil activation test: comparison of different basophil identification markers,” Cytometry Part B—Clinical Cytometry, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 183–189, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. S. H. Tsai, M. Kinoshita, T. Kusu et al., “The ectoenzyme E-NPP3 negatively regulates ATP-dependent chronic allergic responses by basophils and mast cells,” Immunity, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 279–293, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  173. N. Abuaf, H. Rostane, B. Rajoely et al., “Comparison of two basophil activation markers CD63 and CD203c in the diagnosis of amoxicillin allergy,” Clinical & Experimental Allergy, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 921–928, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  174. H. J. Hoffmann, A. F. Santos, C. Mayorga et al., “The clinical utility of basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease,” Allergy, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 1393–1405, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  175. H. J. Hoffmann, E. F. Knol, M. Ferrer et al., “Pros and cons of clinical basophil testing (BAT),” Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, vol. 16, no. 8, article 56, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  176. M. Steiner, A. Harrer, and M. Himly, “Basophil reactivity as biomarker in immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions—potential and limitations,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 7, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  177. H. Kahlert, R. Suck, B. Weber et al., “Characterization of a hypoallergenic recombinant Bet v 1 variant as a candidate for allergen-specific immunotherapy,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 193–206, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  178. M. Wallner, M. Hauser, M. Himly et al., “Reshaping the Bet v 1 fold modulates TH polarization,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 1571.e9–1578.e9, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  179. L. Tordesillas, P. Gamboa, M. L. Sanz et al., “A mutant of the major melon allergen, Cuc m 2, with reduced IgE binding capacity is a good candidate for specific immunotherapy,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 504–511, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  180. T. Saarne, L. Kaiser, H. Grönlund, O. Rasool, G. Gafvelin, and M. Van Hage-Hamsten, “Rational design of hypoallergens applied to the major cat allergen Fel d 1,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 657–663, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  181. H. Kahlert, O. Cromwell, and H. Fiebig, “Measurement of basophil-activating capacity of grass pollen allergens, allergoids and hypoallergenic recombinant derivatives by flow cytometry using anti-CD203c,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1266–1272, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  182. M. Focke-Tejkl, M. Weber, K. Niespodziana et al., “Development and characterization of a recombinant, hypoallergenic, peptide-based vaccine for grass pollen allergy,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 1207–1217.e11, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  183. M. Curin, M. Weber, T. Thalhamer et al., “Hypoallergenic derivatives of Fel d 1 obtained by rational reassembly for allergy vaccination and tolerance induction,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 882–894, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  184. K.-W. Chen, K. Blatt, W. R. Thomas et al., “Hypoallergenic der p 1/Der p 2 combination vaccines for immunotherapy of house dust mite allergy,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 435.e4–443.e4, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  185. M. Wald, H. Kahlert, G. Reese et al., “Hypoallergenic mutants of the timothy grass pollen allergen Phl p 5 generated by proline mutations,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 130–142, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  186. G. Gadermaier, A. Harrer, T. Girbl et al., “Isoform identification and characterization of Art v 3, the lipid-transfer protein of mugwort pollen,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1919–1924, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  187. H. Berkner, C. S. Von Loetzen, M. Hartl et al., “Enlarging the toolbox for allergen epitope definition with an allergen-type model protein,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID A2488, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  188. G. Gadermaier, B. Jahn-Schmid, L. Vogel et al., “Targeting the cysteine-stabilized fold of Art v 1 for immunotherapy of Artemisia pollen allergy,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1292–1298, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  189. B. K. Ballmer-Weber, K. Brockow, A. Fiocchi et al., “Hydrolysed egg displays strong decrease in allergenicity and is well tolerated by egg-allergic patients,” Allergy, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 728–732, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  190. A. Harrer, R. Lang, R. Grims et al., “Diclofenac hypersensitivity: antibody responses to the parent drug and relevant metabolites,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 10, Article ID e13707, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  191. L. Vogel, D. Lüttkopf, L. Hatahet, D. Haustein, and S. Vieths, “Development of a functional in vitro assay as a novel tool for the standardization of allergen extracts in the human system,” Allergy, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1021–1028, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  192. E. F. Knol and M. Olszewski, “Basophils and mast cells: underdog in immune regulation?” Immunology Letters, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 28–31, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Markus Steiner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

2073 Views | 910 Downloads | 6 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.