Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 7174561, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7174561
Research Article

Differentiation Model Establishment and Differentiation-Related Protein Screening in Primary Cultured Human Sebocytes

1Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
2Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
3Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yi-Ming Fan; moc.361@3691nafmy and Ge-Shi

Received 28 December 2017; Accepted 6 March 2018; Published 5 April 2018

Academic Editor: Ichiro Kurokawa

Copyright © 2018 Man-Feng Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Sebocyte differentiation is a continuous process, but its potential molecular mechanism remains unclear. We aimed to establish a novel sebocyte differentiation model using human primary sebocytes and to identify the expression profiles of differentiation-associated proteins. Primary human sebocytes were cultured on Sebomed medium supplemented with 2% serum for 7 days. Flow cytometry showed that S phase cells were decreased time-dependently, while G1 and subG1 (apoptosis) phase cells increased under serum starvation. Transmission electron microscopy and Oil Red O staining revealed a gradual increase of intracellular lipid accumulation. Expression of proliferation marker was diminished, while expression of differentiation, apoptosis, and lipogenic markers elevated gradually during 7-day culture. iTRAQ analysis identified 3582 expressed proteins in this differentiation model. Compared with day 0, number of differentially expressed proteins was 132, 54, 321, and 96 at days 1, 3, 5, and 7, respectively. Two overexpressed proteins (S100 calcium binding protein P and ferredoxin reductase) and 2 downexpressed proteins (adenosine deaminase and keratin 10) were further confirmed by Western blot and immunohistochemistry.

1. Introduction

Sebocytes can produce lipid-rich sebum to function in epidermal barrier, hair follicle integrity, and antibacterial and antioxidant properties [1, 2]. Abnormal sebum secretion is involved in some common dermatosis including acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, rosacea, and seborrheic dermatitis [3, 4]. Sebocyte differentiation in mice is divided into undifferentiated (stem and proliferating cells) and differentiated (maturating and fully differentiated cells) stages that are, respectively, characterized by keratin 5 (K5) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) expression [5]. The terminal differentiation of human sebocytes presents with increased cell size, cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid droplets, and nuclear degeneration, followed by holocrine secretion and cell death [6, 7]. A recent study of mouse model unraveled that holocrine secretion of sebum is a DNase2-mediated form of programmed cell death distinct from apoptosis, necroptosis, and cornification [8]. Zouboulis et al. firstly compared the markers of human sebocyte versus keratinocyte differentiation in vitro in 1991 [9]. Cell confluence levels generally serve as differentiation stages of in vitro cultured sebocytes [10, 11]. However, to date a well-established differentiation model of human primary sebocytes has been unavailable, and the feasible markers of sebocyte differentiation have not been fully elucidated, which may hinder to understand the physiological function of sebaceous glands and pathophysiological mechanisms of sebaceous gland-related diseases.

PPARγ, liver X receptors (LXR), sterol regulatory element binging protein (SREBP1), and Forkhead box O1 (FoxO1) may be main lipogenic factors for sebocytes [1215]. PPARγ could be a potential marker of sebocyte differentiation because its expression correlates with the differentiation stage of sebocytes [12]. LXR agonists inhibited proliferation but promoted lipogenesis in SZ95 sebocytes [13]. SREBP1 may be a key regulator of lipid synthesis in sebaceous glands through inducing expression of lipogenic genes [14, 16]. FoxO1 might be implicated in acne pathogenesis by mediating androgen receptor, PPARγ, LXR, and SREBP1 expression [15, 17, 18]. Additionally, our previous study showed that sex determining region Y-related high mobility group box 9 (Sox9) can promote sebocyte proliferation, differentiation, and lipogenesis [10]. However, expression levels of these lipogenic factors at diverse differentiation stages are undetermined. In this study, we first established a differentiation model of human primary sebocytes. In addition, the differentially expressed proteins were identified by iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis, and 4 candidate proteins were further validated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The normal scalp for sebocyte isolation and culture was obtained from 5 patients undergoing plastic surgery, while facial skin for immunohistochemistry was taken from 3 patients with acne vulgaris and 3 healthy subjects. This study was approved by the ethical committee of our hospital (number PJ2012055). The written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Cell Culture and Differentiation Model Construction

Primary sebocyte cultures were performed according to a previously described method [10, 11]. Briefly, the isolated sebaceous glands from the separated epidermis of normal scalp were transferred to a tissue culture dish. The isolated cells were cultivated in Sebomed basal medium (Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco BRL, Rockville, MD, USA) and 5 ng/ml recombinant human epidermal growth factor (Invitrogen) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. The cells were harvested with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco BRL) and subcultured after they became subconfluent. The cells after the second passage were used in this study. Sebocytes grown to 50% confluence were serum starved for 24 h in Sebomed without FBS, and the cells at this time point were designated as day 0 (D0). To induce differentiation, the D0 sebocytes were switched into Sebomed supplemented with 2% FBS and cultured up to 7 days with medium change every day.

2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy

Sebocytes plated onto Aclar discs were induced to differentiate for various times and then fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4°C overnight, followed by postfixation in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. Samples were dehydrated and embedded in EPON-812 resin (TAAB Laboratories, Berkshire, UK). Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were cut with Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), doubly stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed with JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 80 kV.

2.4. Oil Red O Staining

Sebocytes grown onto a 12-well culture plate were either left untreated or incubated in Sebomed with 2% FBS to induce differentiation. Intracellular lipid level was measured using Oil Red O staining as described by Li et al. [11].

2.5. Cell Cycle Distribution and Apoptosis Determination

Cell cycle and apoptosis were determined using Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis Kits (Yeasen Corporation, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, after preparation of single-cell suspension, the cells were subjected to FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and cell populations within G1, S, G2, and SubG1 (apoptosis) phages were measured using ModFit LT 3.2 software.

2.6. Western Blot

Cells were collected and lysed in Proprep solution (Intron, Daejeon, Korea). The concentration of obtained protein was measured using Bradford protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Samples were then run on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with following primary antibodies: Sox9, SREBP1, P53, P21, ADA, K5, K10, S100P, and actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); FoxO1, PPARγ, and LXR (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); and FDXR (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Blots were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies) and visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Intron).

2.7. iTRAQ Coupled Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Analysis

Protein samples were prepared from sebocytes at D0, D1, D3, D5, and D7 and labeled using iTRAQ Reagent-8 plex multiplex kit (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The iTRAQ-labeled peptides were then subjected to high-pH reversed-phase fractionation in Agilent 1100 HPLC System (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a Gemini-NX (Phenomenex, 00F-4453-E0, Torrance, CA, USA) column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3 μm, 110 Å) as described elsewhere [19, 20]. The collected fractions were then examined by Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). The top ten most intense signals in the acquired MS spectra were selected for further MS/MS analysis. The detected protein threshold was set to achieve a 1% false discovery rate. Original data of mass spectrometry were searched through Mascot 2.2 (Matrix Science Limited, London, UK) under the software platform Proteome Discoverer 2.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) against UniProt human protein database (Uniprot-human-160524.fasta) [21, 22].

2.8. Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was performed on the paraffin-embedded specimens according to a previously described method [10]. The primary antibodies included polyclonal mouse anti-human S100P (clone B10, 1 : 100 dilution; Santa Cruz), ADA (clone D10, 1 : 100 dilution; Santa Cruz), K10 (clone LH1, 1 : 100 dilution; Santa Cruz), and rabbit anti-human FDXR (ab122900, 1 : 100 dilution; Abcam).

All experiments were repeated at least three times with different batches of cells. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was set at .

3. Results

3.1. Establishment of Sebocyte Differentiation Model

Sebocyte differentiation is a continuous process [23], but its potential molecular mechanism remains unclear. The accumulation of cytoplasmic lipid vesicles (lipid droplets) is a main feature of sebocyte differentiation [4]. Since the immortalized sebocyte lines only underwent partial differentiation [23], we used the primary human sebocytes to construct the in vitro differentiation model. Serum deprivation can induce G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis in various cells [24]. The addition of 2% FCS induced expression of late differentiation markers in keratinocytes [25]. An 84 h culture led to 95% confluence rate in human sebocytes under 10% FBS [10]. Accordingly, we speculated that serum deprivation may also initiate sebocyte differentiation. To testify this hypothesis, human primary sebocytes were switched from growth media supplemented with 10% FBS into a basal medium containing 2% FBS, followed by simultaneous determination of cellular DNA contents and apoptosis using flow cytometry. The percentages of S phase cells were decreased time-dependently by serum starvation, while those of G1 and subG1 (apoptosis) phases increased (Figure 1(a)). In addition, transmission electron microscopy revealed that small lipid vacuoles were present in the cytoplasm at day 1, and their number and volume were gradually incremental thereafter over a 7-day culture period (Figure 1(b)). Oil Red O staining showed a gradual increase of intracellular lipid accumulation (Figure 1(c)). Together, these findings suggest that serum deprivation can effectively trigger differentiation of primary sebocytes.

Figure 1: Establishment of human sebocyte differentiation model in vitro. Primary sebocytes cultured in growth media with 10% FBS were switched into media containing low serum concentrations (2% FBS) and incubated for 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days, respectively. (a) Cell cycle and apoptosis were determined using flow cytometry. (b) Transmission electron microscopy showed incremental number and volume of intracytoplasmic lipid vacuoles over a 7-day culture period (scale bars = 5 μm). L, lipid vacuole; N, nucleus; Ly, lysosome. (c) Oil Red O staining exhibited a gradual increase of intracellular lipid accumulation (scale bars = 20 μm). , compared with day 0.
3.2. Detection of Lipogenic, Proliferation, Differentiation, and Apoptosis Markers in Sebocyte Differentiation Model

To validate the sebocyte differentiation model, we firstly examined expression of lipogenic factors by Western blot. FoxO1, LXR, Sox9, and SREBP1 levels were increased time-dependently, with a top at D5 and D7 (Figure 2(a)). Then, expressions of proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis markers were detected. We found that K5 was prominent (Figure 2(b)) at D0, while PPARγ was remarkable at D5–D7 (Figure 2(a)). P53 and P21 were almost undetectable at D0 but progressively increased after D1 (Figure 2(c)). These data support the successful establishment of human sebocyte differentiation model and imply that the sebocytes at D0 and at D5–D7, respectively, represent undifferentiated and fully differentiated cells.

Figure 2: Expression of proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and lipogenic markers in sebocyte differentiation model. Primary sebocytes were incubated for 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days under serum deprivation. The cells were then lysed and subjected to immunoblotting analysis using antibodies against FoxO1, Sox9, PPAR, SREBP1, and LXR (a) or K5 (b) or P53 and P21 (c). Actin was used as a loading control.
3.3. Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Sebocyte Differentiation Model

To gain further insights into the mechanisms of sebocyte maturation, the differentially expressed proteins in undifferentiated sebocytes (D0), maturating sebocytes (D1 and D3), and fully differentiated sebocytes (D5 and D7) were identified using an iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic approach. The differentially expressed proteins were screened using a fold change cut-off of ±1.5. A total of 3582 proteins were identified from 17939 peptides during sebocyte differentiation, which were matched with 205655 MS/MS spectra (data not shown). Compared with D0, the number of differentially expressed proteins was 132 at D1, 54 at D3, 321 at D5, and 96 at D7 (Figure 3; Table S1). Based on the literature, the skin-associated functions of 41 differentially expressed proteins at D7 in human skin are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Skin-associated functions of 41 differentially expressed proteins at D7 compared with D0.
Figure 3: Proteome alterations during human sebocyte differentiation in vitro. Human primary sebocytes were induced to differentiate by serum deprivation. These cells were harvested at days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 and then subjected to the iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis. Numbers of up- and downregulated proteins in differentiated sebocytes at days 1, 3, 5, and 7 were shown. The expression profile of cells at day 0 was used as a control.
3.4. Validation of 4 Candidate Proteins during Sebocyte Differentiation

To further confirm the iTRAQ results, we chose 4 significantly differentially expressed proteins that may be related to proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in sebocytes or keratinocytes, of which S100 calcium binding protein P (S100P) and ferredoxin reductase (FDXR) were upregulated but adenosine deaminase (ADA) and K10 were downregulated (Table 1). Western blot showed that expression of S100P and FDXR was remarkably increased either in maturing sebocytes or in fully differentiated sebocytes compared to undifferentiated cells, while expression of ADA and K10 was reverse (Figure 4(a)). Furthermore, immunostaining of these proteins was performed on acne lesion and normal skin. K10 was located in the cytoplasm, S100P in the nucleus, and FDXR in the cytoplasm and nucleus of sebocytes. Compared with normal skin, S100P and FDXR expression were significantly higher but K10 expression was slightly lower in acne lesion. However, ADA immunoreactivity was negative in both acne lesion and normal skin (Figure 4(b)). These results suggest that S100P, FDXR, and K10 may regulate human sebocyte differentiation and contribute to acne pathogenesis.

Figure 4: Expression of 4 candidate proteins in sebocytes and acne lesion. (a) Human primary sebocytes were cultivated under serum deprivation for indicated times, and expression levels of S100P, FDXR, ADA, and K10 were monitored by Western blot. Actin was used as a loading control. (b) Representative immunostaining images of S100P, FDXR, ADA, and K10 in sebaceous glands of acne lesion and normal skin (scale bars = 50 μm).

4. Discussion

Both sebocytes and keratinocytes seem to originate from bipotential progenitor stem cells [26], but their differentiation fates are different. Keratinocyte differentiation has been explored in numerous cell models [25], but less is known about sebocyte differentiation. Differentiation may be induced by various procedures. High Ca2+, low serum, confluence, and lower incubation temperature can influence keratinocyte differentiation [25]. Nevertheless, low concentration of extracellular Ca2+ may enhance sebocyte differentiation [26]. The incremental cell density in continuous cultures is a common method to induce sebocyte differentiation in vitro [911]. Sebocyte confluence levels approached 20%, 50%, 75%, and 95% when cultivated on the medium containing 10% FBS for 12 h, 36 h, 60 h, and 84 h, respectively [10]. Serum deprivation induces differentiation, apoptosis, and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in various cells [24]. The 2% FCS can more efficiently trigger expression of late differentiation markers than high Ca2+ switch in keratinocytes [25]. Thus, we decided to reduce the serum concentration from 10% to 2%, with attempts to slow down proliferation and extend differentiation process. Ultrastructural observation and Oil Red O staining uncovered that intracellular lipid accumulation was time-dependently increased during 7-day culture period. Flow cytometry revealed a time-dependent decrease in S phase and increase in G1 and subG1 (apoptosis) phases. Our results suggest serum deprivation can be used to construct the human sebocyte differentiation model.

In order to validate the reliability of sebocyte differentiation model, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and lipogenic markers were determined. K5 and PPARγ can act as proliferation and differentiation markers in mouse sebocytes, respectively [5]. P53 can suppress cell cycle and enhance apoptosis, and its target gene P21 is required for the apoptotic action [27]. LXR, Sox9, FoxO1, and SREBP1 seem to be the main lipogenic factors for sebocytes [10, 1315]. In this sebocyte differentiation model, K5 was only expressed at D0, while PPARγ was significantly detectable at D5–D7. Expression levels of P53, P21, LXR, Sox9, FoxO1, and SREBP1 increased progressively after D1. Based on these findings, we propose that the sebocytes at D0, D1–D3, and D5–D7 in this differentiation model might represent proliferative, early differentiated, and fully differentiated cells, respectively.

Quantitative proteome analysis has not been performed during sebocyte differentiation process. In our sebocyte differentiation model, numbers of differentially expressed proteins reached the top at D5 and the nadir at D3 compared with D0, suggesting that sebocyte differentiation may be the most remarkable at D5. Intriguingly, except that P53 expression was 1.2-fold only at D7, expression of the differentiation and lipogenic markers was absent from D0 to D7. Aebersold et al. proposed that the quality of MS data is superior to that of Western blot [28]. It is unclear whether the iTRAQ results may represent the general view of this sebocyte differentiation model, and these data remain to be further testified using targeted proteomic methods.

Of 41 skin-associated proteins at D7, 2 upregulated (FDXR, S100P) and 2 downregulated (ADA and K10) proteins were selected, and their expression in vitro and in vivo was detected by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. FDXR, a mitochondrial enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of ferredoxin, may regulate epidermal differentiation via elevating reactive oxygen species [29]. S100 proteins belong to the superfamily of calcium binding proteins and implicate in the regulation of many cellular processes including growth, differentiation, cycle progression, transcription, and secretion [30]. Although ADA is mainly involved in immune system development in humans, it is also critical for cell proliferation and differentiation. The p63 gene knockdown can reduce proliferation and ADA expression in human keratinocytes [31]. K10 is the common keratinization-associated keratin of suprabasal keratinocytes in the epidermis [32]. The targeted deletion of K10 reinforced sebocyte proliferation and differentiation in mice [33]. Western blot results displayed overexpression of S100P and FDXR and downexpression of ADA and K10 in differentiated sebocytes, which testifies the iTRAQ analysis. In addition, immunostaining demonstrated overexpression of S100P and FDXR but mild downexpression of K10 in acne lesion, while ADA expression was absent in both acne lesion and normal skin. These results imply that S100P and FDXR may enhance but K10 and ADA reduce human sebocyte differentiation, and S100P, FDXR, and K10 could be involved in the acne pathogenesis. However, further studies are needed to ascertain their molecular mechanisms on sebocyte proliferation and differentiation.

In conclusion, a human sebocyte differentiation model is successfully established using serum deprivation. Meanwhile, iTRAQ quantitative proteomics analysis demonstrates presence of 96 differentially expressed proteins at D7, with 41 proteins possessing skin-associated functions. This in vitro differentiation model of human sebocytes may be helpful to investigate the regulatory mechanism of sebaceous gland and pathogenesis of sebaceous gland-associated disorders. Nevertheless, the roles of these differentially expressed proteins in sebocyte differentiation await further studies.

Abbreviations

ADA:Adenosine deaminase
AR:Androgen receptor
FDXR:Ferredoxin reductase
FoxO1:Forkhead box O1
iTRAQ:Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation
K5:Keratin 5
K10:Keratin 10
LXR:Liver X receptors
PBS:Phosphate-buffered saline
PPARγ:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ
S100P:S100 calcium binding protein P
SGs:Sebaceous glands
Sox:Sex determining region Y-related high mobility group box
SREBP:Sterol regulatory element binging protein.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Ge-Shi, Man-Feng Zhang, and Yi-Ming Fan conceived and designed the experiments. Man-Feng Zhang, Kai-Peng Jing, Pei-Yu Liao, Xiao-Lin Cai, and Shi-Jie Li performed the experiments. Ge-Shi, Wen-Li, Chuan-Chuan Cai, and Juan-Hua Quan analyzed the data. Ge-Shi contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. Ge-Shi and Yi-Ming Fan wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31371377, 81201239, and 81773345) and Training Program for Outstanding Young Teachers in Higher Education Institutions of Guangdong Province (no. YQ2015085). The authors gratefully acknowledge Shanghai Omicsspace Biotechnology Co. Ltd. for technical assistance with the peptide/protein identification.

Supplementary Materials

Table  S1: number of differentially expressed proteins at D1, D3, D5, and D7 compared with D0 in human sebocyte differentiation model. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. K. R. Smith and D. M. Thiboutot, “Thematic review series: skin Lipids. Sebaceous gland lipids: friend or foe?” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 271–281, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. C. Zouboulis, J. M. Baron, M. Böhm et al., “Frontiers in sebaceous gland biology and pathology,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 542–551, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. Y. Shi, M. Leo, L. Hassoun, D. S. Chahal, H. I. Maibach, and R. K. Sivamani, “Role of sebaceous glands in inflammatory dermatoses,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 856–863, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Dahlhoff, E. Camera, M. Picardo et al., “PLIN2, the major perilipin regulated during sebocyte differentiation, controls sebaceous lipid accumulation in vitro and sebaceous gland size in vivo,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1830, no. 10, pp. 4642–4649, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. R. Schneider and R. Paus, “Sebocytes, multifaceted epithelial cells: Lipid production and holocrine secretion,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 181–185, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. C. Zouboulis, A. Krieter, H. Gollnick, D. Mischke, and C. E. Orfanos, “Progressive differentiation of human sebocytes in vitro is characterized by increasing cell size and altering antigen expression and is regulated by culture duration and retinoids,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 151–160, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Wróbel, H. Seltmann, S. Fimmel et al., “Differentiation and apoptosis in human immortalized sebocytes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 175–181, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Fischer, J. Fumicz, H. Rossiter et al., “Holocrine Secretion of Sebum Is a Unique DNase2-Dependent Mode of Programmed Cell Death,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 587–594, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. C. Zouboulis, L. Xia, M. Detmar et al., “Culture of human sebocytes and markers of sebocytic differentiation in vitro,” Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 74–83, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Shi, T.-T. Wang, J.-H. Quan et al., “Sox9 facilitates proliferation, differentiation and lipogenesis in primary cultured human sebocytes,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Z. J. Li, S. B. Park, K. C. Sohn et al., “Regulation of lipid production by acetylcholine signalling in human sebaceous glands,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 116–122, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Dozsa, B. Dezso, B. I. Toth et al., “PPARγ-mediated and arachidonic acid-dependent signaling is involved in differentiation and lipid production of human sebocytes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 910–920, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. I. Hong, M.-H. Lee, T.-Y. Na, C. C. Zouboulis, and M.-O. Lee, “LXRα enhances lipid synthesis in SZ95 sebocytes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 1266–1272, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. H. Kwon, J. B. Lee, J. Y. Yoon et al., “The clinical and histological effect of home-use, combination blue-red LED phototherapy for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris in Korean patients: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 168, no. 5, pp. 1088–1094, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. C. Melnik, “Isotretinoin and FoxO1: A scientific hypothesis,” Dermato-Endocrinology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 141–165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. M. Smith, K. Gilliland, G. A. Clawson, and D. Thiboutot, “IGF-1 induces SREBP-1 expression and lipogenesis in SEB-1 sebocytes via activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 1286–1293, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Kamei, S. Miura, T. Suganami et al., “Regulation of SREBP1c gene expression in skeletal muscle: Role of retinoid x receptor/liver x receptor and forkhead-O1 transcription factor,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 2293–2305, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. C. Melnik, “FoxO1—the key for the pathogenesis and therapy of acne?” Journal of the German Society of Dermatology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Wang, F. Yang, and M. A. Gritsenko, “Reversed-phase chromatography with multiple fraction concatenation strategy for proteome profiling of human MCF10A cells,” Proteomics, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2019–2026, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. T. S. Batth, C. Francavilla, and J. V. Olsen, “Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 6176–6186, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Sandberg, G. Lindell, B. N. Källström et al., “Tumor proteomics by multivariate analysis on individual pathway data for characterization of vulvar cancer phenotypes.,” Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, vol. 11, no. 7, p. M112.016998, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Zhan, Y.-T. Yang, H.-M. You et al., “Plasma-based proteomics reveals lipid metabolic and immunoregulatory dysregulation in post-stroke depression,” European Psychiatry, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 307–315, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. C. Zouboulis, M. Picardo, Q. Ju et al., “Beyond acne: Current aspects of sebaceous gland biology and function,” Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 319–334, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H.-K. Yoon, J.-W. Lee, K.-S. Kim et al., “Serum deprivation-induced human GM3 synthase (hST3Gal V) gene expression is mediated by Runx2 in human osteoblastic MG-63 cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, article no. 35, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A.-S. Borowiec, P. Delcourt, E. Dewailly, and G. Bidaux, “Optimal Differentiation of In Vitro Keratinocytes Requires Multifactorial External Control,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID e77507, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. I. Tóth, A. Oláh, A. G. Szöllosi, G. Czifra, and T. Bíró, “"Sebocytes' makeup" - Novel mechanisms and concepts in the physiology of the human sebaceous glands,” Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, vol. 461, no. 6, pp. 593–606, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. M. Kim, C.-H. Jung, J. Kim, S.-G. Hwang, J. K. Park, and H.-D. Um, “The p53/p21 complex regulates cancer cell invasion and apoptosis by targeting Bcl-2 family proteins,” Cancer Research, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 3092–3100, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Aebersold, A. L. Burlingame, and R. A. Bradshaw, “Western blots versus selected reaction monitoring assays: time to turn the tables?” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2381-2382, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. A. Bhaduri, A. Ungewickell, L. D. Boxer, V. Lopez-Pajares, B. J. Zarnegar, and P. A. Khavari, “Network Analysis Identifies Mitochondrial Regulation of Epidermal Differentiation by MPZL3 and FDXR,” Developmental Cell, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 444–457, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Zhu, S. Okano, and M. Takahara, “Expression of S100 protein family members in normal skin and sweat gland tumors,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 211–219, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Sbisà, G. Mastropasqua, K. Lefkimmiatis, M. F. Caratozzolo, A. M. D'Erchia, and A. Tullo, “Connecting p63 to cellular proliferation: The example of the adenosine deaminase target gene,” Cell Cycle, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 205–212, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. I. Kurokawa, K. Takahashi, I. Moll, and R. Moll, “Expression of keratins in cutaneous epithelial tumors and related disorders - distribution and clinical significance,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 217–228, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Reichelt, B. Breiden, K. Sandhoff, and T. M. Magin, “Loss of keratin 10 is accompanied by increased sebocyte proliferation and differentiation,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 83, no. 11-12, pp. 747–759, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus