BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 1050285 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1050285

Transcription Factor IRF4 Dysfunction Affects the Immunosuppressive Function of Treg Cells in Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Academic Editor: Marija Mostarica-Stojković
Received01 Mar 2019
Revised12 May 2019
Accepted13 Jun 2019
Published10 Jul 2019

Abstract

Background. Th17/Treg balance skews towards Th17 in ITP patient. IRF4 has been highlighted for its close relationship to the immunosuppressive function of Treg cells and the IL-17 synthesis in CD4+ T cells. This study was aimed at examining the effects of IRF4 to the Th17/Treg cells in patients with ITP. Methods. Treg and Teff cells were isolated from PBMCs of newly diagnosed ITP patients. The percentages of CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells and the CD3+CD4+IL-17+Th17 cells were detected by flow cytometry. After being cultured, the supernatants of Tregs were collected for IL-10 concentration test. The IRF4 levels of Tregs were measured. Teffs were cultured alone or with Tregs for 24 hours. Then the supernatants were collected for IL-17 concentration test. The binding intensity of IRF4 to the gene IL-10 in Treg cells was detected by ChIP-qPCR. Metabolic assays for Teffs and Tregs were performed with Agilent Seahorse XF96 Analyzer. Results. The secretion of IL-10 by Tregs was decreased in ITP patients. The intensity of IRF4 binding to IL-10 DNA of Tregs in patients was higher than that of normal controls and Teffs in ITP patients. The expressions of IRF4 of Tregs in ITP patients were remarkably lower than that of healthy controls. The percentage of Th17 cells in healthy controls was significantly increased after IRF4 mRNA silencing. Abnormal metabolism of Treg and Teff cells was found in ITP patients. Conclusion. The skewed ratio of Th17/Treg cells and dysfunction of Treg cells in newly diagnosed ITP patients was at least partly caused by IRF4 dysfunction. The underlying mechanism might be the impact of IRF4 on the metabolism of Treg and Teff cells.

1. Introduction

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune heterogeneous disorder presenting with decreased platelet count and increased bleeding risk. Both impaired platelet production and increased platelet destruction are significant in the pathogenesis of ITP, in which autoreactive T cells and innate immune system play important roles [1, 2].

CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells and CD3+CD4+IL-17-producing Th17 cells are two subsets of CD4+ T helper (Th) cells [2]. TGF-β and IL-10 producing Treg cells are crucial immune response regulators in autoimmune diseases [3]. It is known that decreased number and dysfunction of Treg cells play important role in ITP [4]. IL-17 produced by Th17 cells lead to subsequent inflammation factors release and tissue damage in ITP and other autoimmune disease [5, 6]. Th17/Treg balance is regarded as a key factor in immune homeostasis; a variety of autoimmune diseases were caused when Th17/Treg balance is skewed [79]. The ratio of Th17/Treg cells in active SLE patients is significantly higher than that in inactive patients and healthy controls, which associate with the severity of disease [10]. Our previous study indicated that the percentage of Treg cells in ITP patients was significantly lower than that of healthy controls, and the ratio of Th17/Treg correlated with the disease activity of ITP [11].

The transcription factor interferon regulatory factor (IRF4) has been known to be associated with immune regulation and is essential to the differentiation of the effector CD4+ T helper cell subsets [1217]. The previous study in mouse found that the upregulation of IRF4 is dependent on the expression of Foxp3 [18]. In patients with autoimmune diseases, abnormality of Foxp3 expression resulted in IRF4-deficiency, which caused incapable of starting the transcription of downstream gene and impaired immunosuppressive function of Treg cells [18]. IRF4 is a critical transcription factor both for Treg and Th17 cells in CD4+ T cells [19].

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an important regulatory cytokine of Tregs in inflammatory conditions [20]. IL-10 elevates Tregs’ suppression against Teffs, while Tregs of ITP patients could not effectively produce enough IL-10 to sufficiently inhibit Teffs [21, 22]. Effective corticosteroids treatment improved the IL-10 production of Tregs in ITP patients, which suggested that IL-10 levels might associate with ITP disease states. IL-10-producing Tregs directly inhibit Th17 and IFN-γ+IL-17+double-producing T cells (IFN-γ+IL-17+Th cells) via IL-10 secretion [2327]. Recent studies showed that the increase of IL-10-producing Foxp3+Tregs was accompanied with disease remission in several different systematic autoimmune diseases, such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, diabetes, and arthritis [2830].

Via metabolic reprogramming, CD4+ effector T cells and Treg cells support their proliferation and immunological function [31]. Induced Treg cells have been shown to utilize mainly a distinct metabolic program based on mitochondrial oxidation of lipid and pyruvate [3234]. CD4+CD25-Teff cells are dependent on aerobic glycolysis for proliferation and inflammatory functions [35, 36]. Whether there is any correlation between the dysfunction of Treg cells and the cell metabolism status remains to be explored.

One the other hand, previous study has shown the impaired ability of IL-10 secretion of Treg cells, which suggests the impairment of Treg cells regulatory function in ITP patients [22]. IL-10 is IRF4-dependent downstream cytokine of Treg cells [18, 37]. It is unclear if there are any associations between the IRF4 with the Th17/Treg imbalances and abnormal secretion of IL-10 in ITP patients, or how the cell metabolism involved in the disease progression is. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the expressions of IL-10 and the immunosuppressive function of Treg regulated by IRF4 and the impact on the balance of Th17/Treg in newly diagnosed ITP patients, in order to better understand the pathogenesis of ITP, and could pave ways to specific immune therapy targeting ITP and other autoimmune diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Healthy Controls

Thirty-six patients with newly diagnosed ITP were enrolled into this study (20 females and 16 males, age range 19-77 years, and median age 49 years) (Supplementary Table 2). ITP was diagnosed per criteria proposed by an international working group [1, 38, 39]. Twenty healthy volunteers were recruited as normal controls (normal control group, NC group) (Supplementary Table 3). The study was approved by the institutional review board of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to the enrollment.

2.1.1. Sample Preparation [22]

Twenty milliliter peripheral venous blood samples of each study subject were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-treated tubes and diluted 1:2 with Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) before Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation (2, 200 rpm at room temperature for 15 min). Washed and resuspended isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cryopreserved in fetal bovine serum containing 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored in liquid nitrogen for future studies.

2.1.2. Flow Cytometry Analysis [22]

To test CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells, 1 × 106 PBMCs were stained with CD4 FITC (eBioscience, San Diego, California, USA, Cat# 11-0048-42) and CD25 PE-CY7 (BD Bioscience, Cat# 506225). To detect Th17 cells, 1 × 106 PBMCs were adjusted concentration as 5 × 105/ml in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 200 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and cultured in 24-well plates overnight. Before stimulation, the supernatants were collected for IL-17 ELISA test. The concentration of PBMCs were stimulated with 50 ng/ml phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, Cat# P8139) and 500 ng/ml ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# I9657) for 4 hours. End in 2 hours after incubation, 1 ul/ml brefeldin A solution (BFA, Biolegend, Cat# 420602) was added to the culture system. Then PBMCs were stained with CD4 FITC and CD25 PE-CY7. After the fixation and permeabilization step described above, the cells were stained with IL-17A PerCP-Cy5.5 (BD Bioscience, Cat# 560799). All steps are according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Supplementary 4). Acquisition was performed on a FACS Aria II flow cytometer (BD biosciences, USA) and then analyzed using Flowjo software version 7.6.1 (Tritar Inc., San Carlos, California, USA).

2.1.3. Cell Purification and Culture [22]

Dead cells were removed by dead cell removal kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, California, USA, Cat# 130-090-101). CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells and CD4+CD25-Teffs were isolated from PBMC using the CD4+CD25+Treg cells isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Cat# 130-091-301) according to manufacturer’s instruction (Supplementary 4). The purification of Tregs and Teffs were determined by FACS Aria II flow cytometer (BD biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) using CD4 APC (Biolegend, San Diego, California, USA, Cat# 300514) and CD25 PE (Biolegend, Cat# 302605).

Before culture, 24-well round-bottom plates were preincubated with anti-CD3 (10 μg/ml; Biolegend, Cat# 300414) at 37°C for 2 hours. Teffs were cultured with Tregs at 8:1 ratio or without Tregs. The cells were cultured in 1 ml per well in 24-well round-bottom plates which were preincubated and stimulated with anti-CD28 (2.5 μg/ml, Biolegend, Cat# 302914) and 10 ng/ml interleukin-2 (IL-2; Biolegend, Cat# 589102).

2.1.4. RNA Silencing

The siRNAs for IRF4 and Negative control siRNA were purchased from GenePharma. RNA strand sequences were sense: 5’- GGCUUGGGCACUGUUUAAATT-3’ and antisense: 5’-UUUAAACAGUGCCCAAGCCTT (IRF4-Homo-342); sense: 5’-GCGCUUUGAACAAGAGCAATT-3’ and antisense: 5’-UUGCUCUUGUUCAAAGCGCTT (IRF4-Homo-422). CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells and Teffs were isolated from PBMCs of healthy controls and cultured for 24 h. The day before transfection, take 5×104 CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells inoculated on 24-well round-bottom plates. Take 20 pmol siRNA and 50 μl DMEM into solution. Lipofectamin TM 2000 (Invitrogen) was diluted 1:50 in DMEM. siRNA/Lipofectamine compound formed after dilution and was added to the culture system, then it was incubated in the CO2 incubator (at the temperature of 37°C). After 6 hours, compounds were removed and cells were washed and then cocultured with 8 times of the number of CD4+CD25-Teffs for 24 hours. The cells were harvested for flow cytometry analysis of Th17 cells and the centrifugal supernatant was used for ELISA test for IL-17 concentration.

2.1.5. ELISA

Supernatants from peripheral venous blood samples of patients and volunteers and the cell cultures were collected and stored at -80°C until the cytokine measurements. The secretions of IL-17A (R&D Systems, Inc., Cat# D1700) by coculture systems and IL-10 (R&D Systems, Inc., Cat# EL217B) by Tregs were measured in duplicate by ELISA following the manufacturer’s recommendation. Results were expressed for each subject as cytokine concentration in pictogram per milliliter.

2.1.6. Western Blotting

1 x SDS buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 7722) was added to sorting CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells from PBMCs. After cracking, samples were ultrasonically processed for 10 to 15 seconds. 20 μl sample aliquots were then heated at 95°C for 5 minutes, and cooled on ice. After centrifuged for 5 minutes, sample aliquots were added on SDS-page gel (Cell Signaling Technology) and combined with biotin labeled protein molecular weight standard (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 7727) 10 μl per lane. After electrophoresis of protein power transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 12369), nitrocellulose membrane was cleaned twice at room temperature by 25 ml TBS for 5 minutes each time, incubated in 25 ml sealing fluid at room temperature for 1 hour, and cleaned with 15 ml TBS/T 3 times for 5 minutes each time. After incubated primary antibodies, anti-IRF4 Ab (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 4964s) and β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology) were added. The protein bands were detected with an ECL Detection System (Santa Cruz Biotechnology. SignalFire™ ECL Reagent, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 6883).

2.1.7. Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from Treg cells and reverse-transcribed to cDNA using an iSCRIPT cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using an Applied Biosystems ABI 7500. The primers were purchased from Applied Biosystems and the primer sequences listed in Supplementary Table 1. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Relative gene expression was expressed upon normalization against 18S RNA.

2.1.8. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

CD4+CD25+Treg cells and CD4+CD25-Teffs were separated from PBMCs of ITP patients and healthy volunteers with magnetic bead and transferred to the centrifuge. Formaldehyde (270 μl, 37%) was added and their final concentration was adjusted 1% for 10 min incubation at room temperature. Then 125 mM ice-cold glycine (505 ul 2.5 M) was added for another 5 min at room temperature. Cells were washed and supernatant was removed. Protease inhibitors were added to lysis buffer 1 and lysis buffer 2. Pellets were resuspended in 1mL lysis buffer 1 and swirled after 10 min at 4°C, then centrifuged and abandoned the supernatant. The pellets were resuspended in 300 μL of lysis buffer 2 and placed on the ice for 30 min. Then the pellets sonicated on the ice with a Bioruptor. The generated fragments were approximately 500 bp long, as determined experimentally by Agileng 2100 software. 750 μl IP buffer, 100 μl 5% BSA, magnetic beads-antibody complex, and 4 μg anti-IRF4 Ab (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat# 4964s) 30 μl were added; 0.6 μl Salmon Sperm DNA, 100 μl fragments of chromosome, 10 μl protease inhibitors, and PMSF 10 μl were mixed well. After incubation at 4°C overnight, the beads were subsequently washed with buffers A, B, and C (according to the instructions), at 4°C with permanent rotation for 10 mins. Following two washes with TE buffer, samples were eluted in 150 μl Chip Elution Buffer for 1 hour at 65°C. Samples were then added 8 μl proteinase K and 6 μl NaCI (5 M) and cross-links reversed at 65°C overnight. DNA was purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN).

2.1.9. Metabolic Assays of Treg and Teff Cells

Two hundred mL of Seahorse Bioscience calibrant (pH 7.4) was added to each well of a Seahorse Bioscience 96-well utility plate before the day of assay. The XF96 cell culture plate (Seahorse Bioscience) was coated with 10 μL of Cell-Tak (BD Biosciences) which were prepared a working solution in sterile H2O. NaHCO3 0.1 M (pH 8.0) 40 μL was added to per well to neutralize and promote adsorption of Cell-Tak to the plate, incubated overnight at 37°C. Oligomycin, FCCP, and 2-DG (Sigma) were diluted and added as Agilent Seahorse XFe96 Extracellular Flux Assay Kit. OCR and ECAR were measured by XF96 extracellular flux analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience) as described [40]. OCR and ECAR values were normalized to cell number. Glycolytic capacity is distinguished by the difference between the ECAR following the injection of oligomycin and ECAR following glucose injection.

2.1.10. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 13.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Normality was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test. Student t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test were used for data fulfilled normal distribution and for those did not, respectively. One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal Wallis testing was used for normal or nonnormal data, respectively. The least significant difference test was used for post hoc multiple comparisons. Two-sided p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. The Ratio of Th17/Treg Cells Increased, While the Secretion of IL-10 Decreased in ITP Patients

The population of CD4+CD2Foxp3+ T cells from PBMCs of ITP patients and healthy volunteers were identified as Tregs. The percentage of Treg cells in ITP group was decreased, compared with that in control group ((2.12 ± 0.30)% vs (6.22 ± 0.27)%, p<0.001), Figures 1(a) and 1(c). The population of CD3+CD4+IL-17+ T cells was identified as Th17 cells, and their percentage was significantly greater than that in normal controls ((2.43 ± 0.12) % vs (1.05 ± 0.09) %, p<0.001), Figures 1(b) and 1(d). The ratio of Th17 cells to Treg cells increased in ITP patients when compared with NC group (1.61 ± 0.32 vs 0.17 ± 0.02, p<0.001), Figure 1(e). The secretion of IL-10 by Tregs decreased in ITP group, compared with NC group ((1.23 ± 0.10) % vs (15.17 ± 0.49) %, p<0.001), Figure 1(f).

3.2. Abnormal Expression of Interleukin Regulatory Factor 4 Gene in Treg Cells of ITP Patients

IRF4mRNA expression was evaluated in CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells in 5 patients and 5 control subjects of NC groups. The expression of IRF4mRNA of Treg cells from ITP patients was significantly lower than that of NC group (2.17 ± 0.31 vs 4.40 ± 0.48, p=0.0077), Figures 2(a) and 2(b). The expression of IRF4 protein in Tregs of patients with ITP was identified with western blot. Densitometry analysis showed a significantly decreased of IRF4 protein level in patients with ITP, compared with NC group (0.83 ± 0.01 vs 0.91 ± 0.01, p=0.0014), Figures 2(c) and 2(d).

3.3. The Target Gene IL-10 of IRF4 Was Associated with the Inhibition Function of Treg Cells in ITP Patients

The expression of IL-10 mRNA, which is IRF4’ downstream gene, was measured by ChIP-qPCR (Figures 3(a) and 3(b); Supplementary Table 1). The intensity of IRF4 binding to IL-10 DNA of CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells in patients with ITP was higher than that of normal control group (1.16 ± 0.06 vs 0.29 ± 0.03, p=0.0051) Figure 3(c). For CD4+CD25-Teffs cells, the intensity of IRF4 binding to IL-10 DNA in patients was lower than that in the normal control group (0.09 ± 0.00 vs 0.27 ± 0.01, p=0.006), Figure 3(d). While the intensity of IRF4 binding to IL-10 DNA of CD4+CD2Foxp3+Tregs was higher than that of CD4+CD25-Teffs cells in ITP patients (1.16 ± 0.06 vs 0.12 ± 0.03, p=0.034). There was no difference between CD4+CD2Foxp3+Tregs with CD4+CD25-Teffs cells in NC group (0.29 ± 0.03 vs 0.27 ± 0.07, p=0.804) Figure 3(e).

3.4. After RNA Silencing of IRF4 Gene of Treg Cells of Healthy Controls, the Regulation Function of Tregs Was Compromised

IRF4 RNA silencing of CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells from healthy control group (Figure 4(a)): Teffs were cultured with Tregs at 8:1 ratio or without Tregs (Figure 4(b)). Then the secretion of extracellular IL-17 cytokines of Th17 cells was measured. The data indicated that the regulation function of Tregs was damaged after the IRF4 gene silencing. The percentage of Th17 cells in CD4+ T cells showed a significant high level when compared with the control group after cocultured with CD4+CD25-T cells (H324 (1.84 ± 0.12) % vs (0.91 ± 0.19) %, p=0.002; H422 (2.00 ± 0.10) % vs (0.91 ± 0.19) %, p=0.005), Figures 4(c) and 4(d). But the secretion of extracellular IL-17 had no change compared before and after coculture (H342 13.99 ± 1.572 pg/ml vs 15.49 ± 2.29 pg/ml, p=0.6047; H422 9.13 ± 1.58 pg/ml vs 15.49 ± 2.29 pg/ml, p=0.0516), Figure 4(e). The expression of IL-17mRNA was measured after Treg cells were interfered and cocultured with CD4+CD25-Teffs. The data showed that IL-17mRNA was increased after coculture (H342 28.57 ± 1.51 vs 0.43 ± 0.30, p<0.0001; H422 17.60 ± 1.37 vs 0.43 ± 0.30, p=0.0003), Figure 4(f).

3.5. Abnormal Metabolism of Treg and Teff Cells in ITP Patients

The role of Tregs and Teffs metabolism was assessed in ITP patients to explore the Tregs and Teffs experience metabolic reprogramming to support proliferation and immunological function [11]. The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of Treg cells in ITP patients was higher than that of the control group (73.03 ± 11.32 vs 27.97 ± 6.46, p=0.0135), Figure 5(a). For the Teffs, lower level OCR was found in ITP group compared to NC group (70.58 ± 8.65 vs 89.25 ± 1.37, p=0.0171), Figure 5(b). The extracellular media acidification rate (ECAR) of Teff cells was higher than that of the controls (82.23 ± 1.15 vs 75.90 ± 1.55, p=0.0671), Figure 5(c). ECAR of Tregs showed a higher level compared with NC group (93.20 ± 2.27 vs 72.98 ± 0.35, p=0.0001) and compared with Teffs (93.20 ± 2.27 vs 82.04 ± 1.47, p=0.0061), Figure 5(d). The ratio of oxygen consumption to lactate production (OCR/ECAR) of Tregs in patients with ITP increased compared with NC group (1.06 ± 0.10 vs 0.66 ± 0.09, p=0.0224), Figure 5(e). The ratio of OCR/ECAR of Teffs was decreased in ITP patients compared with NC group (0.90 ± 0.054 vs 1.18 ± 0.04, p=0.0031), Figure 5(f).

4. Discussion

ITP is known as an autoimmune disease with decreased Treg cells at its onset. Our previous study has indicated that the balance of Th17/Treg is skewed towards Th17 cells, and Th17/Treg ratio might be associated with the clinical diversity of ITP patients at disease onset [11]. The current study found that the expression levels of IRF4 gene and protein of Treg cells in patients with ITP were lower than that of healthy volunteers. The RNA interference targeting IRF4 genes in Treg cells can weaken Treg cells’ inhibition of Th17 cells. Furthermore, IRF4-deficient Treg cells showed compromised immunosuppressive function and impaired suppressive activity in ITP patients.

IL-10 is a vital cytokine in immune regulation. It has been shown that Treg cells from IL-10-/- mice lose the ability to inhibit Th17 cells [41]. Such that Treg cells’ inhibition function to Th17 cells depends on IL-10 in mice [27]. IL-10 secretion of Tregs was found to be decreased in ITP patients [11, 22]. Insufficient secretion of IL-10 causes impairment of inhibitory capability of Tregs against Teffs in newly diagnosed ITP patients [22].

Although not all but 5 samples for each group were examined due to the sparse of the blood specimens, the expression level of IRF4mRNA and IRF4 protein of Treg cells in ITP patients did show to be lower than that of healthy volunteers, indicating that the immunosuppressive function of IRF4-deficient Treg cells was impaired in ITP setting. To IRF4 protein, the differences in protein images were not obvious, but statistically significant. Several studies have shown that IRF4 is a main regulator connecting with the differentiation and function of Treg and Th17 cells [4246]. The suppressive activity of Treg cells in ITP patients was also found to be impaired [4]. Evidence showed that the expression of the transcription factor Blimp-1 defined a population of Treg cells that localized mainly to mucosal sites and produced IL-10. The transcription factor IRF4 was indispensable for Blimp-1 expression and for the differentiation of Treg cells [47, 48]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by qPCR analysis (ChIP-qPCR) is a widely used technique to study gene expression. In the current study, the target gene IL-10 of IRF4 on CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells was studied. The results showed that the intensity of IRF4 binding to IL-10 DNA on Tregs was higher in patients with ITP than that of normal controls and CD4+CD25-Teffs. Conversely, the intensity of IRF4 binding to IL-10 DNA on CD4+CD25-Teffs was lower than normal control group. No significant difference was found between Tregs and Teffs in healthy volunteers. Our data also showed that the secretion of IL-10 of Treg cells in ITP patients was lower than that of healthy controls. In addition, abnormal expression of interleukin regulatory factor 4 gene and abnormal metabolism in Treg cells were detected in ITP patients. These data suggested that IL-10 secretion of Tregs was damaged in ITP patients, although there is enhanced binding force of IRF4 with IL-10 gene which should be compensatory at the onset of the disease. The genetic abnormality of IRF4 on Treg cells might affect the immunosuppression function of Treg cells directly. IRF4 dysfunction of Treg cells results in Th17/Treg imbalances and also may be associated with the secretion of IL-10 through the regulation of metabolism of Tregs.

RNA silencing of IRF4 gene of Treg cells in healthy controls led to the impairment of the regulation function of Tregs to Th17 cells. After IRF4 gene silencing, the ratio of Th17/Treg was increased, likewise as the impaired IRF4 gene of Tregs at onset of ITP.

The percentage of Th17 cells in CD4+ T cells showed a higher level compared with the control group after cocultured with CD4+CD25-Teff cells. The effect of Tregs’ suppression on Teffs was improved when IL-10 was added to the coculture system. The percentages of Th17 and IL-17 increased in the coculture system after IL-10 was added. The data showed that IRF4 has high affinity with IL-10 DNA on Treg cells in ITP. IRF4 is closely related to the Treg cells for their immunosuppressive function. IRF4 expressed in various hematopoietic cells, including B cells, T cells, macrophage and dendritic cell subsets [4952], plays vital role for T cells differentiation [13, 15, 46, 53]. Our finding suggested that the immunosuppressive function of IRF4-deficient Treg cells was compromised in ITP patients. Consequently the function of Treg cells which is determined by dysfunctional IRF4 regulated IL-10 was also impaired.

The increased glycolysis and decreased oxidative phosphorylation of Teff cells were detected in ITP patients, which indicated that Teff cells in ITP patients were overactivated. It has been shown that IRF4 controls the expression of proteins involved in central metabolic pathways such as glucose uptake, glycolysis, and oxidative phosphorylation and thereby promotes changes in cell metabolism necessary for T cell proliferation and effector functions [54]. Teff cells are dependent on the glucose transporter Glut1 and aerobic glycolysis for proliferation and inflammatory functions, as inhibition of glycolysis or deletion of Glut1 impairs Teff cell function in vivo [35, 36]. Due to the requirement of Seahorse testing technology, the specimens obtained from ITP patients cannot match the requirement for test of OCR and ECAR after IRF4 silencing. Recently, there is study showed that the mTOR-IRF4 may influence the function and activation of peripheral Treg cells [55]. And our data also suggested that there is a link between IRF4 and the metabolism of Treg cells. Treg cell function was impaired, and IL-10 secretion disorder might be related to T cell energy metabolism, which is worthy of further study.

Genetic abnormality of IRF4 on CD4+CD2Foxp3+Tregs leads to the dysfunction of Treg cells. CD4+CD25-effector T cells and CD4+CD2Foxp3+Treg cells support their proliferation and immunological function in metabolic reprogramming [31]. The expression of Foxp3 of Tregs results in decreased glucose uptake, glycolysis, and lactate production [56].

The increased glycolysis and high ratio of OCR/ECAR of Tregs were found in ITP patients. IL-17 within the Th17 cells was increased; however there was no change of the expression of extracellular IL-17 cytokines after IRF4 gene silencing. The intensity of IRF4 binding to IL-10 DNA on Tregs was increased in ITP patients. The dysfunction of IL-10 secretion of Tregs resulted in inadequate peripheral IL-10 cytokines. These results highly suggested that the immune function of Treg cells in ITP patients could be related to the changes of cell metabolism as abnormal metabolism of Treg and Teff cells in ITP patients were detected. Treg cells are known to have high amounts of IRF4 that depends on Foxp3 expression. The abnormal expression of Foxp3 could result in IRF4 missing, resulting in unable to start the transcription of downstream gene and compromise the immunosuppressive function of Treg cells in patients with autoimmune diseases [18].

In present study, the abnormal metabolism of Tregs and inadequate secretion of IL-10 seemed to be caused by dysfunction of IRF4 in patients with ITP. The activation of Teff cells was results of abnormal cell metabolism. Taken together, the abnormal secretion of IL-10 and IL-17 was related to the abnormal metabolism of T cells. Further study is needed to validate this mechanism.

5. Conclusion

IRF4 gene dysfunction of Treg cells in ITP patients leads to the compromised immunosuppression function of Treg cells and the excessive activation of CD4+CD25-Teffs. The decrease of IL-10 and the increase of IL-17 are related to both the overactivation of Teff cells and activated glycolysis of Tregs. Abnormal metabolism of Treg and Teff cells may play an important role in ITP pathogenesis. Further studies are warranted to understand the metabolic signal transduction and function of Treg and Teff cells that might be potential target for ITP immune regulation.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

The study was in accordance with the ethical standards formulated in the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the respective local Medical Ethics Committees of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University.

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before being included in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Meiwen Tang, Luya Cheng, and Yunfeng Cheng conceived the study; Meiwen Tang, Luya Cheng, Lili Ji, Boting Wu, Feng Li, and Yunfeng Cheng performed the literature review and drafted and revised the manuscript; Hao Chen and Yunfeng Cheng contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript; Pu Chen, Yanxia Zhan, Zhihui Min, Chanjuan Liu, Fanli Hua, Yang Ke, Ling Yuan, and Lihua Sun performed the experiments and analyzed data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870098, 81600090, 81500090, and 81470282), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18ZR1407200), and Shanghai Health Bureau Funding (201840351, 20134y117, and 20144Y0194). All authors obtain permission to acknowledge from all those mentioned in the Acknowledgments.

Supplementary Materials

Table 1 is the list of the Primer Sequences, Table 2 is the list of the clinical characteristics of ITP patients, Table 3 is the list of Normal Controls (sex, age, and platelet count no.), and Supplementary 4 shows the methods of flow cytometry analysis, cell purification and culture, and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in detail. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. Y. Wei, X.-B. Ji, Y.-W. Wang et al., “High-dose dexamethasone vs prednisone for treatment of adult immune thrombocytopenia: a prospective multicenter randomized trial,” Blood, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 296–302, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Sakaguchi, M. Miyara, C. M. Costantino, and D. A. Hafler, “FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 490–500, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Schmidt, F. Marabita, N. A. Kiani et al., “Time-resolved transcriptome and proteome landscape of human regulatory T cell (Treg) differentiation reveals novel regulators of FOXP3,” BMC Biology, vol. 16, no. 1, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  4. B. Liu, H. Zhao, M.-C. Poon et al., “Abnormality of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 139–143, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Solanilla, J. M. Pasquet, J. F. Viallard et al., “Platelet-associated CD154 in immune thrombocytopenic purpura,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 215–218, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Nomura, M. Kuwana, and Y. Ikeda, “Induction of T-cell tolerance in a patient with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura by single injection of humanized monoclonal antibody to CD40 ligand,” Autoimmunity, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 317–319, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. Baba, M. Rubio, and M. Sarfati, “Interplay between CD45RA+ regulatory T cells and TNF-α in the regulation of human Th17 differentiation,” International Immunology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 237–244, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. Nistala and L. R. Wedderburn, “Th17 and regulatory T cells: rebalancing pro- and anti-inflammatory forces in autoimmune arthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 602–606, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Khan, S. Moeez, and S. Akhtar, “T-regulatory cell-mediated immune tolerance as a potential immunotherapeutic strategy to facilitate graft survival,” Blood Transfusion, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 357–363, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. Ma, J. Yu, X. Tao, L. Cai, J. Wang, and S. G. Zheng, “The imbalance between regulatory and IL-17-secreting CD4+ T cells in lupus patients,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1251–1258, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Ji, Y. Zhan, F. Hua et al., “The ratio of Treg/Th17 cells correlates with the disease activity of primary immune thrombocytopenia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e50909, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. S. Biswas, G. Bhagat, and A. B. Pernis, “IRF4 and its regulators: evolving insights into the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis?” Immunological Reviews, vol. 233, no. 1, pp. 79–96, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Brüstle, S. Heink, M. Huber et al., “The development of inflammatory T(H)-17 cells requires interferon-regulatory factor 4,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 958–966, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. V. Staudt, E. Bothur, M. Klein et al., “Interferon-regulatory factor 4 is essential for the developmental program of T helper 9 cells,” Immunity, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 192–202, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. Bollig, A. Brustle, K. Kellner et al., “Transcription factor IRF4 determines germinal center formation through follicular T-helper cell differentiation,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 22, pp. 8664–8669, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Nayar, E. Schutten, B. Bautista et al., “Graded levels of IRF4 regulate CD8+ T cell differentiation and expansion, but not attrition, in response to acute virus infection,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 12, pp. 5881–5893, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Manzano, A. Patil, A. Waldrop, S. S. Dave, A. Behdad, and E. Gottwein, “Gene essentiality landscape and druggable oncogenic dependencies in herpesviral primary effusion lymphoma,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, article 3263, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. Zheng, A. Chaudhry, A. Kas et al., “Regulatory T-cell suppressor program co-opts transcription factor IRF4 to control T(H)2 responses,” Nature, vol. 458, no. 7236, pp. 351–356, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Q. Chen, W. Yang, S. Gupta et al., “IRF-4-binding protein inhibits interleukin-17 and interleukin-21 production by controlling the activity of IRF-4 transcription factor,” Immunity, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 899–911, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Sharif, A. Watad, L. Coplan et al., “The role of stress in the mosaic of autoimmunity: An overlooked association,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 967–983, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. O. Li and R. A. Flavell, “Contextual regulation of inflammation: a duet by transforming growth factor-β and interleukin-10,” Immunity, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 468–476, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Li, L. Ji, W. Wang et al., “Insufficient secretion of IL-10 by Tregs compromised its control on over-activated CD4+ T effector cells in newly diagnosed adult immune thrombocytopenia patients,” Immunologic Research, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 269–280, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. Ding and E. M. Shevach, “IL-10 inhibits mitogen-induced T cell proliferation by selectively inhibiting macrophage costimulatory function,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 148, no. 10, pp. 3133–3139, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. C. Fitzgerald, G. X. Zhang, M. El-Behi et al., “Suppression of autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system by interleukin 10 secreted by interleukin 27-stimulated T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1372–1379, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. J. McGeachy, K. S. Bak-Jensen, Y. Chen et al., “TGF-beta and IL-6 drive the production of IL-17 and IL-10 by T cells and restrain T(H)-17 cell-mediated pathology,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1390–1397, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Chaudhry, R. M. Samstein, P. Treuting et al., “Interleukin-10 signaling in regulatory T cells is required for suppression of Th17 cell-mediated inflammation,” Immunity, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 566–578, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Huber, N. Gagliani, E. Esplugues et al., “Th17 cells express interleukin-10 receptor and are controlled by Foxp3(-) and Foxp3+ regulatory CD4+ T cells in an interleukin-10-dependent manner,” Immunity, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 554–565, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. De Kouchkovsky, J. H. Esensten, W. L. Rosenthal, M. M. Morar, J. A. Bluestone, and L. T. Jeker, “MicroRNA-17-92 regulates IL-10 production by regulatory T cells and control of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 1594–1605, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Kornete, E. Sgouroudis, and C. A. Piccirillo, “ICOS-dependent homeostasis and function of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in islets of nonobese diabetic mice,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 1064–1074, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S.-J. Moon, J.-S. Park, Y.-J. Heo et al., “In vivo action of IL-27: reciprocal regulation of Th17 and Treg cells in collagen-induced arthritis,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine, vol. 45, article e46, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. D. Buck, D. O’Sullivan, and E. L. Pearce, “T cell metabolism drives immunity,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 212, no. 9, pp. 1345–1360, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. D. Michalek, V. A. Gerriets, S. R. Jacobs et al., “Cutting edge: distinct glycolytic and lipid oxidative metabolic programs are essential for effector and regulatory CD4+ T cell subsets,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 3299–3303, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. U. H. Beier, A. Angelin, T. Akimova et al., “Essential role of mitochondrial energy metabolism in Foxp3(+) T-regulatory cell function and allograft survival,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2315–2326, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. V. A. Gerriets, R. J. Kishton, A. G. Nichols et al., “Metabolic programming and PDHK1 control CD4+ T cell subsets and inflammation,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 194–207, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C.-H. Chang, J. D. Curtis, L. B. Maggi et al., “Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis,” Cell, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1239–1251, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. N. Macintyre, V. A. Gerriets, A. G. Nichols et al., “The glucose transporter Glut1 is selectively essential for CD4 T cell activation and effector function,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Sawada, Y. Nagano, A. Hasegawa et al., “IL-10-mediated signals act as a switch for lymphoproliferation in Human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 infection by activating the STAT3 and IRF4 pathways,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 13, no. 9, Article ID e1006597, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Rodeghiero, R. Stasi, T. Gernsheimer et al., “Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. 2386–2393, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. Provan, R. Stasi, A. C. Newland et al., “International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 168–186, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Pelletier, L. K. Billingham, M. Ramaswamy, and R. M. Siegel, “Extracellular flux analysis to monitor glycolytic rates and mitochondrial oxygen consumption,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 542, pp. 125–149, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. I. Kochetkova, S. Golden, K. Holderness, G. Callis, and D. W. Pascual, “IL-35 stimulation of CD39+ regulatory T cells confers protection against collagen II-induced arthritis via the production of IL-10,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 12, pp. 7144–7153, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. A. Valdez, P. J. Vithayathil, B. M. Janelsins, A. L. Shaffer, P. R. Williamson, and S. K. Datta, “Prostaglandin E2 suppresses antifungal immunity by inhibiting interferon regulatory factor 4 function and interleukin-17 expression in T cells,” Immunity, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 668–679, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Flutter and F. O. Nestle, “What on "Irf" Is this gene 4? Irf4 transcription-factor-dependent dendritic cells are required for T helper 2 cell responses in murine skin,” Immunity, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 625–627, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. V. Krishnamoorthy, S. Kannanganat, M. Maienschein-Cline et al., “The IRF4 Gene Regulatory Module Functions as a Read-Write Integrator to Dynamically Coordinate T Helper Cell Fate,” Immunity, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 481–497, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Vasanthakumar, K. Moro, A. Xin et al., “The transcriptional regulators IRF4, BATF and IL-33 orchestrate development and maintenance of adipose tissue–resident regulatory T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 276–285, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. R. Myers, T. Lau, E. Markegard et al., “Tonic LAT-HDAC7 signals sustain Nur77 and Irf4 expression to tune naive CD4 T cells,” Cell Reports, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1558–1571, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. Cretney, A. Xin, W. Shi et al., “The transcription factors Blimp-1 and IRF4 jointly control the differentiation and function of effector regulatory T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 304–311, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. J. Johnston, A. C. Poholek, D. DiToro et al., “Bcl6 and Blimp-1 are reciprocal and antagonistic regulators of T follicular helper cell differentiation,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5943, pp. 1006–1010, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Huber and M. Lohoff, “IRF4 at the crossroads of effector T-cell fate decision,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1886–1895, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Suzuki, K. Honma, T. Matsuyama et al., “Critical roles of interferon regulatory factor 4 in CD11bhighCD8alpha- dendritic cell development,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 24, pp. 8981–8986, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  51. B. V. Lugt, A. A. Khan, J. A. Hackney et al., “Transcriptional programming of dendritic cells for enhanced MHC class II antigen presentation,” Nature Immunology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. Bajaña, K. Roach, S. Turner, J. Paul, and S. Kovats, “IRF4 promotes cutaneous dendritic cell migration to lymph nodes during homeostasis and inflammation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 7, pp. 3368–3377, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Huber, A. Brüstle, K. Reinhard et al., “IRF4 is essential for IL-21-mediated induction, amplification, and stabilization of the Th17 phenotype,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 52, pp. 20846–20851, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. K. Man, M. Miasari, W. Shi et al., “The transcription factor IRF4 is essential for TCR affinity–mediated metabolic programming and clonal expansion of T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1155–1165, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. N. M. Chapman, H. Zeng, T. M. Nguyen et al., “mTOR coordinates transcriptional programs and mitochondrial metabolism of activated Treg subsets to protect tissue homeostasis,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, article 2095, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. V. A. Gerriets, R. J. Kishton, M. O. Johnson et al., “Foxp3 and Toll-like receptor signaling balance Treg cell anabolic metabolism for suppression,” Nature Immunology, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1459–1466, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Meiwen Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

650 Views | 289 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.