BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 8571541 |

Ayat B. Al-Ghafari, Khadijah S. Balamash, Huda A. Al Doghaither, "Relationship between Serum Vitamin D and Calcium Levels and Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer", BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 8571541, 7 pages, 2019.

Relationship between Serum Vitamin D and Calcium Levels and Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer

Academic Editor: Charnita M. Zeigler-Johnson
Received28 May 2019
Accepted25 Jul 2019
Published26 Aug 2019


Background. Many epidemiological studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency is associated with various types of human cancers. The biological action of vitamin D and its metabolites is mediated by the transcription factor vitamin D receptor (VDR). The VDR gene is highly expressed in the colon and is involved in many biological functions. The aim of the current study was to assess the relationship between serum vitamin D metabolite and calcium levels with VDR polymorphisms in normal and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods. Fifty Saudi CRC patients and fifty controls were enrolled in the study. The levels of total vitamin D, 25(OH)D3, and calcium were measured in serum. Results. The homozygous genotype (aa) of the ApaI VDR polymorphism (rs7975232) was found to correlate with total serum vitamin D levels of CRC patients, while the heterozygous (Tt) TaqI VDR polymorphism (rs731236) was associated with serum calcium levels. In contrast, the BsmI and FokI VDR polymorphisms (rs1544410 and rs2228570, resp.) did not affect the serum levels of total vitamin D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, and calcium. Conclusion. Appropriate vitamin D levels were shown to be important in preventing the onset of CRC.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D is an effective regulator of several physiologic processes, such as calcium (Ca) homeostasis and innate and adaptive immunity [1, 2]. On a molecular level, the effects of vitamin D are mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR) [3, 4]. The VDR is a transcription factor and a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily [5]. Epidemiological and experimental studies reveal that the VDR and its ligands are promising targets for the prevention and possible treatment of cancer, autoimmune diseases, and infections, as well as of bone and mineral disorders [6, 7].

Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] induced by exposure to sunlight never exceed 60 ng/mL (149.76 nmol/L). According to the Mayo medical laboratories reference ranges, the total serum level of 25(OH)D ranges from 25 to 80 ng/ml, with a 25(OH)D level of less than 30 ng/ml defined as vitamin D insufficiency, a 25(OH)D level of less than 20 ng/ml defined as vitamin D deficiency, and a 25(OH)D level of 80 ng/ml or greater defined as possible toxicity [8]. Interindividual differences in the human genome, often referred to as gene polymorphisms, are called variants when they appear in at least 1% of the population. A number of biological processes and diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, autism, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and rheumatoid arthritis, associate with VDR polymorphisms [5, 912]. However, the molecular mechanism by which the variants of the VDR gene exert these effects is unclear [1, 13]. This also applies to the role of VDR polymorphisms in colorectal cancer (CRC).

According to the cancer incidence report issued by the Saudi Cancer Registry in 2014, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, CRC represents 10.4% of all cancers and is the second most common cancer type after breast cancer among Saudi cancer patients. Among Saudi males, CRC is the most common cancer (11.8%) [14, 15]. Compared to other types of cancers, CRC occurs sporadically [16] and presents at a younger age in Saudis, especially in women [14]. The underlying etiology of CRC is not well determined, but it has been proposed that the onset of CRC results from the interaction between exogenous chemical and biological factors such as age, diet, smoking, physical activity, and individual genetic predisposition [17, 18].

Available treatment options for CRC depend on the stage of the disease. Treatment of CRC has systematically advanced over the past few years with the introduction of effective chemotherapeutic agents. These drugs are often used in combination with biological therapy in patients with advanced disease, such as enhancing the response of immune system and the use of minerals and vitamins [19]. A number of studies have investigated the contribution of vitamin D status and VDR gene variants (polymorphisms and mutations) in several types of cancer, including CRC. Most of these studies showed that insufficient vitamin D status may contribute to CRC development [2024]. However, the results of studies on VDR gene polymorphisms and their relation to CRC development and prognosis are contradictory [2528]. In fact, these correlations mostly result from the interaction between VDR polymorphisms and other factors, such as Ca and vitamin D intake, plasma levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], UV radiation exposure, obesity, and energy intake [2932].The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between serum total vitamin D, 25(OH)D3, and Ca levels and VDR polymorphisms in the manifestation of CRC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

Fifty CRC patients (12 females and 38 males) aged 30–80 years were selected from the day care unit of King Abdulaziz University Hospital (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia). The same number of age- and sex-matched healthy controls were randomly selected from the blood bank unit. All study participants were of Saudi ethnicity and signed an ethical consent form, following the Declaration of Helsinki’s human ethical principles. CRC patients were accepted at any stage of the disease but had no primary tumors other than CRC. Members of the control group had no previous history of any systemic illness or cancer. The study protocol as well as the questionnaire and the informed consent were approved by the ethics committee of King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Medicine (reference no. 379-17). From each study participant, two blood samples were drawn for DNA and serum extraction.

2.2. Genotyping of Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Variants

Extracted genomic DNA (100 ng/ml) was amplified in a 25 µl polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with 12.5 µl HotStart-IT® FideliTaq™ PCR Master Mix (2X) (Affymetrix/USB™, 71156, USA), 9.5 µl RNase free water (Affymetrix/ USB™, 7732-18-5, USA), and 1 µl of each primer (0.2 µmol). The primers and the PCR thermocycler reactions were previously published in Hajj et al. [29] for ApaI and BsmI, whereas for TaqI and FokI in Rizk et al., [21]. The amplified PCR products were genotyped with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using appropriate restriction endonucleases from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) [FastDigest ApaI (FD1414), FastDigest TaqI, (FD0674), FastDigest Mva1269I (FD0964), and FastDigest FokI (FD2144)] following the manufacturer’s instructions. The different genotypes for each variant were confirmed with 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and 10% of the samples were selected randomly for further DNA sequencing confirmation.

2.3. Measurement of Serum Total Vitamin D, 25(OH), and Ca Levels

The level of total vitamin D [25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3] in serum was measured using a commercial LIAISON®25OH Vitamin D Total Assay Kit (DiaSorin, USA). Serum Ca and 25(OH)D3 levels were measured by the ADVIA Centaur chemiluminescent reaction in the Biochemistry laboratory at King Abdulaziz University Hospital.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed on GraphPad Prism version 7.00 (San Diego, California, USA). The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare differences between two independent groups with either one physical or biochemical variable. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison was applied to correlate the genotype distribution of each VDR variant with total vitamin D, 25(OH)D3, and Ca levels measured in the serum. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Values in tables were represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM).

3. Results

A total of 100 study participants were enrolled: fifty CRC patients and fifty healthy controls. All CRC patients were treatment-experienced and had completed the full course of chemotherapy. The common chemotherapy regimens of the CRC cases were capecitabine (Xeloda) as neoadjuvant therapy with radiation; oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xelox) intravenously for 6 to 8 weeks; and, finally, irinotecan intravenously and capecitabine as tablets twice a day (Xeliri) for 2 to 3 weeks. The baseline of sociodemographic and laboratory measurements for study participants is presented in Table 1. There was a highly significant difference in body mass index (BMI) between CRC patients and controls (P < 0.0001). This is due to poor food intake in the patients as a consequence of chemotherapy, resulting in a loss of appetite. Table 1 shows highly significant differences in serum total vitamin D and Ca levels between patients and controls (P < 0.0001). In contrast, serum 25(OH)D3 levels were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Physical and biochemical Patients (n=50)Controls (n=50)P value

Age (years)55.58±1.77951.72±1.5970.06
Height (cm)165.6±1.372163.8±1.6860.57
Weight (kg)74.96±2.16480.80±2.2160.10
BMI (kg/m2)27.26±0.77630.20±0.7610.02
Hip (cm)111.8±2.749108.0±2.3960.40
Waist (cm)101.1±2.906101.8±3.1970.73
Waist-to-hip ratio0.912±0.0210.946±0.0230.79
Total vitamin D (nmol/L)88.22±9.56143.30±10.33< 0.0001
25(OH)D3 (nmol/L)33.16±1.98937.64±2.0270.10
Ca (mmol/L)2.22±0.0212.32±0.014< 0.0001

BMI: Body mass index, Ca: Calcium, P value was calculated by Mann-Whitney test.

In order to find a possible correlation between the different genotypes of the VDR gene polymorphisms (ApaI, TaqI, BsmI, and FokI) and the serum total vitamin D, 25(OH)D3, and Ca levels, a Kruskal-Wallis test was performed (Tables 25). In the case of the ApaI polymorphism, only CRC patients with homozygous ApaI (aa) genotypes showed a higher level of total vitamin D in the serum compared to other genotypes (AA) and (Aa) (P value = 0.0071) (Table 2). In contrast, in healthy controls, no significant correlation with any ApaI genotype was found. However, the serum 25(OH)D3 level in both CRC patients and controls did not significantly correlate with the genotypes of ApaI. Interestingly, Ca levels showed a significant correlation with the heterozygous (Aa) genotype in the CRC patient group (the level of Ca was lower in patients with the Aa genotype compared with genotypes AA and aa patients, P = 0.04). In the case of TaqI polymorphism, the values of the three biochemical tests did not show any significant correlation with TaqI genotypes (Table 3). However, heterozygous (Tt) and homozygous (tt) CRC patients had lower total vitamin D levels compared to CRC patients with a normal genotype (TT). In addition, neither the heterozygous nor the homozygous genotypes of BsmI (Table 4) or of FokI (Table 5) correlated significantly with serum total vitamin D, 25(OH)D3, and Ca levels (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant reduction in serum 25(OH)D3 levels in healthy controls with the homozygous (ff) FokI genotype (P = 0.02).

Biochemical testPatients (n=50)Controls (n=50)P value
Frequency ()Frequency ()
AAAaaa AAAaaa
22 (44%)19 (38%)9 (18%)37 (74%)8 (16%)5 (10%)

Total vitamin D (nmol/L)67.96±5.8473.58±10.68171.60±35.82143.80±12.88132.30±19.71155.20±28.08< 0.0001
P value0.00710.86

25(OH)D3 (nmol/L)27.95±2.1937.63±3.0536.44±6.7037.68±2.0633.13±5.2844.60±11.060.12
P value0.080.81

Calcium (mmol/L)2.26±0.0212.15±0.0422.26±0.0442.31±0.0162.34±0.0232.33±0.0550.0007
P value0.040.47

P value was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison.

Biochemical testPatients (n=50)Controls (n=50)P value
Frequency ()Frequency ()
24 (48%)20 (40%)6 (12%)46 (92%)3 (6%)1 (2%)

Total vitamin D (nmol/L)106.20±18.1271.87±8.0672.51±9.89143.10±10.92134.90±45.63168.10±0.00.0008
P value0.760.83

25(OH)D3 (nmol/L)36.29±3.2129.35±2.5933.33±5.4938.04±2.1434.33±8.8429.00±0.00.39
P value0.380.74

Calcium (mmol/L)2.23±0.0222.19±0.0442.26±0.0232.31±0.0142.30±0.0512.40±0.00.0042
P value0.540.51

P value was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison.

Biochemical testPatients (n=50)Controls (n=50)P value
Frequency ()Frequency ()
20 (40%)22 (44%)8 (16%)6 (12%)28 (56%)16 (32%)

Total vitamin D (nmol/L)107.40±16.5879.32±14.7769.30±9.71124.0±23.87130.4±14.40172.4±16.54< 0.0001
P value0.250.07

25(OH)D3 (nmol/L)36.50±3.8530.77±2.5831.38±3.2736.17±4.6038.86±2.4636.06±4.450.48
P value0.580.79

Calcium (mmol/L)2.23±0.0212.18±0.0412.27±0.0352.34±0.0132.31±0.0212.31±0.0230.0031
P value0.350.57

P value was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison.

Biochemical testPatients (n=50)Controls (n=50)P value
Frequency ()Frequency ()
FFFfff FFFfff
33 (66%)13 (26%)4 (8%)24 (48%)23 (46%)3 (6%)

Total vitamin D (nmol/L)91.62±13.4979.15±11.7591.89±26.26154.0±16.46136.20±14.21109.0±11.360.0013
P value0.870.57

25(OH)D3 (nmol/L)33.00±2.6932.69±3.0036.00±6.8842.83±2.6233.48±2.9828.00±9.020.06
P value0.820.02

Calcium (mmol/L)2.22±0.0292.21±0.0232.19±0.0582.33±0.0182.31±0.0192.22±0.0950.0012
P value0.390.30

P value was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison.

4. Discussion

CRC is one of the most aggressive cancers and is responsible for many cancer-related deaths in Saudi Arabia [14]. Although many advances have been made to identify CRC in the early stages, most patients suffering from this cancer are diagnosed at late stages with severe symptoms. Many studies have tried to identify proteins and signaling pathways which may serve as prognostic markers for CRC and other cancer types. One of them is the determination of the genetic signature of the VDR gene polymorphisms in combination with vitamin D status [2028]. In this study, the genotype distribution of the four VDR gene polymorphisms in CRC patients and healthy controls were compared with serum total vitamin D, 25(OH)D3, and Ca levels. The levels of both total vitamin D and Ca in the blood of CRC patients were found to be significantly lower than in healthy controls. On the other hand, the level of 25(OH)D3 did not show any significant difference between the two groups. Our results agreed with other published clinical data that showed a lower vitamin D status [total or 25(OH)D3] in prostate, breast, and colon cancer patients compared to healthy subjects. However, the exact mechanism behind these associations remains unclear [3335].

A recent study of CRC patients before and after receiving chemotherapy suggests that vitamin D repletion is a feasible intervention during chemotherapy [36]. It found that, among patients with a new diagnosis of CRC (no chemotherapy course has started), most patients have deficient or insufficient levels of 25(OH)D3, whereas in patients who received chemotherapy with vitamin D supplementation, the serum 25(OH)D3 levels increased. Another study performed on CRC patients showed that higher circulating vitamin D was related to a significant effect on lowering CRC risk in females but not in males [13]. A clinical trial study performed on stage II and stage III CRC patients evaluated the effect of vitamin D status and physical activity as an intervention method for CRC prevention and treatment [30]. They found that CRC patients of all stages with levels of vitamin D in the highest quantiles had improved overall survival rates compared to those with levels in the lowest quantiles. Our study showed that the homozygous (aa) version of the ApaI VDR polymorphism correlated with total vitamin D levels but not with 25(OH)D3 concentrations in CRC patients. Most previous studies have correlated the level of vitamin D with the risk of CRC or have studied the effect of VDR gene polymorphisms on developing CRC. Little is known about how these polymorphisms affect the levels of circulating vitamin D, 25(OH)D3, and Ca [37]. In contrast to our study, 25(OH)D3 levels in healthy Indians showed a significant association for the TaqI but not the FokI VDR polymorphism [38].

In this study, serum Ca levels were found to correlate significantly with the heterozygous (Tt) genotype of the TaqI VDR polymorphism but not with the other three VDR variants tested. It is known that Ca levels are usually affected in cancer patients and are related to the calcium sensing receptor (CaSR) and to vitamin D metabolism. Fuszek et al. [39] found a lower level of Ca in CRC patients with normal 25(OH)D3 levels. Ca levels inversely correlated with the level of the cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) tumor marker but not with the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or alpha fetoprotein (AFP) tumor markers or the CaSR genotypes. A study with 922 Korean CRC patients showed that Ca consumption was inversely related to CRC risk [40]. Another recent study suggested that lower serum Ca levels are correlated with Nigerian CRC patients that show high CEA levels compared to patients with low levels of the tumor marker [41].

5. Conclusion

This study found that the homozygous genotype (aa) of the VDR SNP ApaI correlates with total vitamin D level in the serum of CRC patients and that the heterozygous genotype (Tt) of the VDR SNP TaqI significantly associates with serum Ca levels. Thus, our findings found that vitamin D status may play an important role in CRC tumorigenesis. However, more studies on larger number of CRC patients in Saudi Arabia or on cancerous tissues are needed to elucidate further the current findings and study the molecular mechanisms.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Research Committee of the Biomedical Ethics Unit at Faculty of Medicine, KAU (reference no. 379-17).

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Ayat B. Al-Ghafari and Khadijah S. Balamash designed the study. Huda A. Al Doghaither and Ayat B. Al-Ghafari conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and read and approved the final version of the manuscript.


This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under Grant no. (RG-6-130-38). The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support. The authors would like also to express their thanks for Prof. Carsten Carlberg, Professor of Biochemistry at University of Eastern Finland, for his critical contribution in reviewing the manuscript.


  1. J. Sun, “The role of vitamin D and vitamin D receptors in colon cancer,” Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, vol. 8, p. e103, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  2. B. Prietl, G. Treiber, T. R. Pieber, and K. Amrein, “Vitamin D and immune function,” Nutrients, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 2502–2521, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Christakos, P. Dhawan, A. Verstuyf, L. Verlinden, and G. Carmeliet, “Vitamin D: metabolism, molecular mechanism of action, and pleiotropic effects,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 365–408, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. V. Dimitrov, R. Salehi-Tabar, B.-S. An, and J. H. White, “Non-classical mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by the vitamin D receptor: Insights into calcium homeostasis, immune system regulation and cancer chemoprevention,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 144, pp. 74–80, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Wang, A. Wu, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, and K. Cao, “Association between Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis risk: A meta-analysis,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 4221–4233, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  6. L. A. Plum and H. F. Deluca, “Vitamin D, disease and therapeutic opportunities,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 941–955, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Choi and M. Makishima, “Therapeutic applications for novel non-hypercalcemic vitamin D receptor ligands,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 593–606, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. A. Kennel, M. T. Drake, and D. L. Hurley, “Vitamin D deficiency in adults: when to test and how to treat,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 752–758, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. Angel, L. Lera, C. Márquez, and C. Albala, “The association of VDR polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes in older people living in community in Santiago de Chile,” Nutrition & Diabetes, vol. 8, no. 1, article 31, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Ciéslińska, E. Kostyra, B. Chwała et al., “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms associated with childhood autism,” Brain Sciences, vol. 7, no. 9, p. 15, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Zaki, S. Kamal, W. Basha et al., “Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism (VDR) with vitamin D deficiency, metabolic and inflammatory markers in Egyptian obese women,” Genes & Diseases, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 176–182, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  12. H. R. Khorram Khorshid, E. Gozalpour, K. Saliminejad, M. Karimloo, M. Ohadi, and K. Kamali, “Vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and late-onset Alzheimer's disease: An association study,” Iranian Journal of Public Health, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1253–1258, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. L. McCullough, E. S. Zoltick, S. J. Weinstein et al., “Circulating vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: an international pooling project of 17 cohorts,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 158–169, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  14. N. Alsanea, M. A. Almadi, A. S. Abduljabbar et al., “National guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in Saudi Arabia with strength of recommendations and quality of evidence,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 189–195, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. P. Shaik, A. S. Shaik, and Y. A. Al-Sheikh, “Colorectal cancer: a review of the genome-wide association studies in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 123–128, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. W. Jasperson, T. M. Tuohy, D. W. Neklason, and R. W. Burt, “Hereditary and familial colon cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 2044–2058, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Raman, A. N. Milestone, J. R. F. Walters, A. L. Har, and S. Ghosh, “Vitamin D and gastrointestinal diseases: inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer,” Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Cunningham, W. Atkin, H.-J. Lenz et al., “Colorectal cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 375, no. 9719, pp. 1030–1047, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Panczyk, “Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 29, p. 9775, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. P. Väyrynen, S. J. Mutt, K. Herzig et al., “Decreased preoperative serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels in colorectal cancer are associated with systemic inflammation and serrated morphology,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID 36519, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. M. Rizk, N. H. Zakaria, and W. G. Elshazely, “Study of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms among egyptian cohort patients with different stages of colorectal cancer,” Journal of Cancer Therapy, vol. 05, no. 03, pp. 253–263, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Jenab, H. B. Bueno-de-Mesquita, P. Ferrari et al., “Association between pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of colorectal cancer in European populations:a nested case-control study,” BMJ, vol. 340, Article ID b5500, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. G. Woolcott, L. R. Wilkens, A. M. Y. Nomura et al., “Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of colorectal cancer: The multiethnic cohort study,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 130–134, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Yin, N. Grandi, E. Raum, U. Haug, V. Arndt, and H. Brenner, “Meta-analysis: longitudinal studies of serum vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 113–125, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. A. Alkhayal, Z. H. Awadalia, M.-A. Vaali-Mohammed et al., “Association of Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with colorectal cancer in a Saudi Arabian Population,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 6, Article ID e0155236, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Budhathoki, T. Yamaji, M. Iwasaki et al., “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer: a nested case-control study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 10, Article ID e0164648, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. V. Vidigal, T. da Silva, C. Pimenta, J. Oliveira, A. Felipe, and N. Forones, “P-220 * Genetic Polymorphism of Vitamin D Receptor BsmI, ApaI and CYP27B1, CYP24A1 genes and the risk of colorectal cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. iv64–iv64, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Sarkissyan, Y. Wu, Z. Chen et al., “Vitamin D receptor FokI gene polymorphisms may be associated with colorectal cancer among African American and Hispanic participants,” Cancer, vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 1387–1393, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Hajj, R. Chedid, E. Chouery, A. Megarbané, and M. Gannagé-Yared, “Relationship between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, cardiovascular risk factors and adiponectin in a healthy young population,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 1675–1686, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Morales-Oyarvide, J. A. Meyerhardt, and K. Ng, “Vitamin D and physical activity in patients with colorectal cancer: epidemiological evidence and therapeutic implications,” Cancer Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. M. John, G. G. Schwartz, J. Koo, D. Van Den Berg, and S. A. Ingles, “Sun exposure, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, and risk of advanced prostate cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 5470–5479, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. M. John, G. G. Schwartz, J. Koo, W. Wang, and S. A. Ingles, “Sun exposure, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 166, no. 12, pp. 1409–1419, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. Shaukat, F. Jaleel, F. A. Moosa, and N. A. Qureshi, “Association between vitamin D deficiency and breast cancer,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 645–649, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  34. G. P. Levin, C. Robinson-Cohen, I. H. de Boer et al., “Genetic variants and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with major clinical outcomes,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 308, no. 18, pp. 1898–1905, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Ahn, D. Albanes, S. I. Berndt et al., “Vitamin D-related genes, serum vitamin D concentrations and prostate cancer risk,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 769–776, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. B. Savoie, A. Paciorek, L. Zhang et al., “Vitamin D levels in patients with colorectal cancer before and after treatment initiation,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. V. Rai, J. Abdo, S. Agrawal, and D. K. Agrawal, “Vitamin D receptor polymorphism and cancer: An update,” Anticancer Reseach, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 3991–4003, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  38. A. A. Bhanushali, N. Lajpal, S. S. Kulkarni, S. S. Chavan, S. S. Bagadi, and B. R. Das, “Frequency of fokI and taqI polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene in Indian population and its association with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels,” Indian Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 108–113, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. Fuszek, P. Lakatos, A. Tabák et al., “Relationship between serum calcium and CA 19-9 levels in colorectal cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1890–1892, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  40. C. Han, A. Shin, J. Lee et al., “Dietary calcium intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a case control study,” BMC Cancer, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 966, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. N. Wichendu and C. Amadi, “Relationship between plasma calcium and carcinoembryonic antigen among colorectal cancer patients,” International Surgery Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1995–1999, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Ayat B. Al-Ghafari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.