Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2019 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7593560 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7593560

Jian-ying Ma, Gang Hu, Qin Liu, "Prognostic Significance of the Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of 5638 Individuals", Disease Markers, vol. 2019, Article ID 7593560, 8 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7593560

Prognostic Significance of the Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of 5638 Individuals

Academic Editor: Massimiliano M. Corsi Romanelli
Received15 Nov 2018
Revised23 Dec 2018
Accepted27 Dec 2018
Published04 Apr 2019


Introduction. A growing number of studies have explored the association between the pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and survival outcomes in various cancers. However, its prognostic significance on bladder cancer remains inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment LMR in bladder cancer. Methods. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), or cancer-specific survival (CSS) clinicopathological features was conducted. Results. Nine studies containing 5,638 cancer patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Patients with high LMR tended to have favourable OS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.80, ), RFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38-0.91, ), and CSS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.83, ). Moreover, low LMR was highly correlated with age (≥60), differentiation (low), T stage (III-IV), lymph node metastasis (yes), and concomitant Cis (yes). Conclusion. Pretreatment LMR might be a useful predictor of survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer.

1. Introduction

Bladder cancer is one of the most common urinary malignancies and represents approximately 90%-95% of urothelial carcinomas [1]. There was an estimated 76,960 newly diagnosed cases (58,950 men and 18,010 women) in the USA in 2016 [2]. Although the accuracy of current diagnostic methods has greatly improved, the 5-year overall survival (OS) remains unsatisfying, especially for metastatic bladder cancer [1, 2]. Furthermore, bladder cancer has a high recurrence rate (50%), and 15-40% of cases develop into a muscle-invasive form of the disease [3, 4]. Therefore, a reliable and readily accessible preoperative prognostic biomarker is required to determine the optimal therapeutic strategies.

A growing number of studies have shown that inflammation has been closely involved in tumorigenesis and cancer progression and also has been found to correlate with the prognosis [5]. Based on the accumulating evidence, inflammation-based models, such as the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), inflammation-based index (IBI), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been developed to predict oncological outcomes in a variety of human cancers [69]. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) has been associated with worse prognoses in various cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and lung adenocarcinoma [1012]. However, because of the inconsistent results, whether LMR is associated with the prognosis in the bladder remains controversial [1315]. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of LMR and analyze the relationships between LMR and clinicopathological parameters in patients with bladder cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategies

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases were comprehensively searched up to September 20th, 2018. Studies focused on the correlation of LMR and bladder cancer were taken into retrieved. Studies were selected using the following keywords: “bladder cancer,” “bladder carcinoma,” “bladder adenocarcinoma,” “bladder tumor,” “bladder neoplasms,” “transitional cell carcinoma,” “ureteral neoplasms,” or “urethral neoplasms” and “LMR,” “lymphocyte to monocyte ratio,” “lymphocyte monocyte ratio,” or “lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio.” The references of retrieved studies were also checked to avoid missing relevant studies. For the detailed search strategies, please refer to the supplementary material file (available here).

2.2. Selection Criteria

The criteria for inclusion were as follows: (1) studies focused on bladder cancer patients, (2) studies that evaluated the prognostic value of LMR, (3) a reported cut-off value for LMR, and (3) available hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for OS, RFS, or CSS. Articles were excluded if they were duplicate publications or reviews, data was not usable, or the studies were only performed on animals.

2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Data extraction and quality evaluation were independently operated by two investigators. Any discrepancies between the two investigators were resolved by discussion until reaching a consensus. General information was gathered as follows: the first authors’ name, year of publication, age, geographical regions, number of patients, distribution of gender, sample size, tumor stage, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, treatment type, tumor size, cut-off values, survival outcome, follow-up period, and concomitant Cis (carcinoma in situ).

The methodological quality of included studies was independently assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [16], which included three primary domains: Selection, Comparability, and Outcome. Studies with an NOS score of ≥6 were deemed high-quality studies.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We used Stata 13.0 statistical software (Stata, College Station) to estimate HRs for OS, RFS, and CSS and odds ratios (ORs) for clinicopathological parameters. As for prognostic variables (e.g., OS, DFS, and RFS), the hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were directly extracted from published studies. Otherwise, they were indirectly calculated from survival curves if only survival curves were available in some studies [17, 18]. The heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran’s test and Higgins statistic; the fixed effect model was used in case of the absence of significant heterogeneity ( or/and %); otherwise, the random effect model was chosen. We then performed subgroup analyses to examine the potential source of heterogeneity. To validate the robustness of the pooled results, sensitivity analyses were performed by removing each study. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test. All values were two-sided, and the difference was considered significant when the value was less than 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Study Characteristics

A total of 123 records were initially retrieved from four common databases (Figure 1). Meanwhile, 2 articles were identified through references. After the removal of duplicates, 96 articles remained for further evaluation. As shown in Figure 1, after screening titles and abstracts, 76 duplicate articles were excluded. The remaining articles were carefully evaluated by evaluating the full texts, and 11 articles were excluded. Finally, a total of 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis [1315, 1924].

Table 1 displays the characteristics of included studies. All included studies were retrospective cohort trials and released from years 2014 to 2018. These studies were carried out in six countries, including Lebanon, UK, China, Japan, Austria, and Poland. The treatments were surgery and mixed methods. Cut-off values of LMR ranged from 1.8 to 4. All cases in the eligible studies were classified into two groups (high and low). Eight studies reported the association between LMR and OS, and 3 studies reported RFS and CSS. NOS scores of all the studies were at least 6 or more (Table 1).

AuthorYearCountryEthnicityFollow-up (months)TreatmentNo. of patientsStageCut-off valueSurvival analysisAnalysisConfounding factors adjusted forNOS score

Lee2015UKCaucasianNASurgery226Early1.8OSMVAge, grade, tumor size, NLR, PLR7
Zhang2015ChinaAsian50.8Mixed124Mixed4OSMVAge, sex, BMI, AC, concomitant Cis, T stage, LNM, DM, PLR8
Yoshida2015JapanAsian72 (27.6-111.6)Mixed181Mixed3.51OSMVT stage, N stage, grade, LVI, margin, AC, LVI7
Lucca2016AustriaCaucasianNASurgery310Early3.3OSMVT stage, grade, concomitant Cis, LVI, NLR, PLR, GPS, PNI6
D’Andrea2017AustriaCaucasian42.4 (18.3-85.1)Surgery4198Mixed3.5OS/RFS/CSSMVGender, age, margin, concomitant Cis, LNM, LVI, AC, NLR8
Miyake2017JapanAsian22 (10–64)Mixed117Mixed3.3OS/CSSUVNA6
Rajwa2018PolandCaucasian14 (7-40)Surgery144Mixed2.44OS/CSSMVT stage, LNM, grade, tumor necrosis, NLR, PLR8

Abbreviations: OS: overall survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival; CSS: cancer-specific survival; MV: multivariate; Cis: carcinoma in situ; AC: adjuvant chemotherapy; NLR: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet-lymphocyte ratio; LNM: lymph node metastasis; DM: distant metastasis; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; GPS: Glasgow prognostic score; PNI: prognostic nutritional index; PMI: psoas muscle index; NA: not available.

4. Meta-Analysis

4.1. Impact of LMR on OS

Eight studies, including 5,368 patients, were included in this meta-analysis of OS. The pooled results showed significant differences in OS among the higher LMR groups and lower LMR groups (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.80, , Figure 2). To further explore the prognostic value of LMR in bladder cancer, subgroup analysis based on the main features was performed. Results for subgroup analyses are shown in Table 2. The results indicated that elevated LMR significantly predicted favourable OS in patient mixed stages (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.49-0.80; ). Pooled HRs for OS were stratified by the cut-off value for LMR. The result showed that patients with had significantly increased OS (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.88, ). However, no prognostic value was observed in patients with (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41-1.04, ). Moreover, the ethnicity, treatment, and analysis method also did not affect the significant predictive value of LMR in bladder cancer patients.

SubgroupNo. of studiesNo. of patientsHR (95% CI) valueHeterogeneity

Overall85,3680.63 (0.50-0.80)<0.00165.90.005
 Asian24220.46 (0.25-0.87)0.01673.30.023
 Caucasian54,9460.80 (0.71-0.89)<0.0018.20.360
Disease stage
 Early25360.61 (0.20-1.82)0.37700.705
 Mixed64,8320.63 (0.49-0.80)<0.00175.30.001
 Surgery44,8780.81 (0.74-0.89)<0.00100.883
 Mixed44820.45 (0.27-0.73)0.00162.30.047
Cut-off for LMR
 ≥354,9300.56 (0.35-0.88)0.01176.60.002
 <334380.65 (0.41-1.04)0.07541.70.180
Analysis method
 Univariate21850.46 (0.27-0.79)0.00500.488
 Multivariate65,1830.67 (0.53-0.86)0.00165.90.005

4.2. Impact of LMR on RFS and CSS

Three studies with 4,536 patients investigated the association between LMR and RFS. The pooled HR was 0.59, which indicated that elevated LMR was significantly associated with favourable RFS (Figure 3). There were three studies with a total of 4,459 patients investigating the predictive value of LMR for CSS. As shown in Figure 4, a statistically significant difference was observed between the higher LMR groups and the lower LMR groups (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.83, ). The result revealed that patients with a high LMR had a significantly favourable CSS compared with those with a low LMR.

4.3. Associations between LMR and Clinicopathological Parameters

Meta-analyses for the association between LMR and clinicopathological parameters were conducted, and the results are presented in Table 3. Compared with high LMR, low LMR was highly correlated with age (≥60 vs. <60; , 95% CI: 1.22-3.50, ), differentiation (low vs. moderate/high; , 95% CI: 1.10-2.32, ), T stage (III-IV vs. I-II; , 95% CI: 1.01-1.28, ), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no; , 95% CI: 1.06-1.39, ), and concomitant Cis (yes vs. no; , 95% CI: 0.78-0.99, ). However, there was no obvious relationship between the LMR and gender (male vs. female; , 95% CI: 0.68-2.04, ), smoking status (always/current vs. never; , 95% CI: 0.63-1.45, ), tumor size (>3 cm vs. <3 cm; , 95% CI: 0.74, 4.71, ), distant metastasis (yes vs. no; , 95% CI: 0.37-5.73, ), and multiplicity (multiple vs. solitary; , 95% CI: 0.68-1.58, ).

CharacteristicsNo. of studiesNo. of patientsOR (95% CI)Heterogeneity

Age (≥60 vs. <60)36262.07 (1.22-3.50)0.007420.18
Gender (male vs. female)44,8181.18 (0.68-2.04)0.56700.02
Smoking status (always/current vs. never)23940.95 (0.63-1.45)0.8200.80
Differentiation (low vs. moderate/high)54,8861.60 (1.10-2.32)0.01350.19
Tumor size (>3 cm vs. <3 cm)24961.86 (0.74-4.71)0.19710.06
T stage (III-IV vs. I-II)34,3901.13 (1.01-1.28)0.0400.79
Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no)34,3901.22 (1.06-1.39)0.00500.67
Distant metastasis (yes vs. no)11241.46 (0.37-5.73)0.59
Multiplicity (multiple vs. solitary)24961.04 (0.68-1.58)0.8600.49
Concomitant Cis (yes vs. no)24,3220.88 (0.78-0.99)0.0300.87

Cis: carcinoma in situ.
4.4. Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias

A sensitivity analysis was performed by omitting the enrolled studies in turn to investigate the stability of the results. The results indicated that the pooled results were relatively reliable and steady (Figure 5).

No obvious publication bias was found among studies (Figure 6), which were also demonstrated in Egger’s test for OS ().

5. Discussion

Recently, more and more studies focused on the correlation between inflammation and cancers revealed that tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis were affected by host systemic inflammatory response as well as tumor microenvironment [5, 25, 26]. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first and most comprehensive meta-analysis that systematically analyzed the prognostic value of pretreatment LMR in bladder cancer survivors. A prognostic effect for LMR on OS, RFS, and CSS was found after pooling the results. Therefore, LMR could serve as biomarker for the prognosis of bladder cancer patients. Additionally, the correlations between LMR and clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. Low LMR was highly correlated with age (≥60), differentiation (low), T stage (III-IV), lymph node metastasis (yes), and concomitant Cis (yes).

LMR, as a composite inflammatory-based prognostic system, has shown great prognostic value in multiple cancers. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been adequately illuminated. Lymphocytes play a major role in suppressing cancer cell proliferation and migration [27]. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are vital components of the antitumor immune microenvironment and are involved in several stages of tumor progression [28, 29]. Cytotoxic lymphocytes, mainly cytotoxic T cells, are essential for eliminating residual cancer cells and are being applied in immunotherapy [30, 31]. Monocytes are thought to have an impact on tumorigenesis through differentiation to tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). TAMs are recruited to the tumor site by obtaining the signal from tumor-derived chemotactic factors [32]. Therefore, the amount and percentage of monocytes could be representative for TAMs reflecting the tumor burden. Recent studies reported that increased infiltration of TAMs was associated with the outcome of various cancers [33, 34]. Thus, LMR may represent a balance between the antitumor immune reaction and the tumor promotion function.

There were several limitations of this study. First, the cut-off value of LMR applied in the enrolled studies was not uniform. This might have made a significant contribution to the substantial heterogeneity. Second, all of the included studies were retrospective. Third, excessive heterogeneity existed among the included studies. However, subgroup analyses showed that the heterogeneity diminished or disappeared in Caucasian patients and patients receiving surgery.

6. Conclusions

Our meta-analysis confirmed that low pretreatment LMR was associated with shorter OS, RFS, CSS, and worse clinicopathological features in patients with bladder cancer. Therefore, LMR could serve as a promising prognostic factor of bladder cancer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Authors’ Contributions

JYM, GH, and QL conceived, designed, and performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors contributed the reagents/materials/analysis tools and wrote the paper. Jian-ying Ma and Gang Hu contributed equally to this work.

Supplementary Materials

The search strategies of this meta-analysis. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. M. Babjuk, M. Burger, E. Compérat et al., “Reply to Harry Herr’s letter to the editor re: Marko Babjuk, Andreas Bohle, Maximilian Burger, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol 2017; 71: 447-61,” European urology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. e173–e174, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. E. Clark, P. E. Spiess, N. Agarwal et al., “NCCN guidelines insights: bladder cancer, version 2.2016,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1213–1224, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. B. Amin, S. C. Smith, V. E. Reuter et al., “Update for the practicing pathologist: the International Consultation On Urologic Disease-European Association of Urology consultation on bladder cancer,” Modern Pathology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 612–630, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Kang, C. W. Jeong, C. Kwak, H. H. Kim, and J. H. Ku, “Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio can significantly predict mortality outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 12891–12901, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. I. Grivennikov, F. R. Greten, and M. Karin, “Immunity, inflammation, and cancer,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 883–899, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. K. Oh and Y. R. Choi, “The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts long-term oncologic outcomes after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 7, no. 6, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Fujikawa, Y. Toiyama, Y. Inoue et al., “Prognostic impact of preoperative albumin–to–globulin ratio in patients with colon cancer undergoing surgery with curative intent,” Anticancer Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1335–1342, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Gkika, D. Bettinger, L. Krafft et al., “The role of albumin–bilirubin grade and inflammation-based index in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy,” Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, vol. 194, no. 5, pp. 403–413, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Hu and Q. Liu, “Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 7375169, 8 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Mano, T. Yoshizumi, K. Yugawa et al., “Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a predictor of survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Liver transplantation, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1603–1611, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Watanabe, A. Yasumoto, Y. Amano et al., “Mean platelet volume and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio are associated with shorter progression-free survival in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 9, article e0203625, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Shimura, M. Shibata, K. Gonda et al., “Prognostic impact of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer with special reference to myeloid-derived suppressor cells,” Fukushima Journal of Medical Science, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 64–72, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Miyake, Y. Morizawa, S. Hori et al., “Integrative assessment of pretreatment inflammation-, nutrition-, and muscle-based prognostic markers in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy,” Oncology, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 259–269, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. Lucca, S. L. Hofbauer, C. V. Leitner et al., “Development of a preoperative nomogram incorporating biomarkers of systemic inflammatory response to predict nonorgan-confined urothelial carcinoma of the bladder at radical cystectomy,” Urology, vol. 95, pp. 132–138, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. M. Lee, A. Russell, and G. Hellawell, “Predictive value of pretreatment inflammation-based prognostic scores (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio) for invasive bladder carcinoma,” Korean Journal of Urology, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 749–755, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Stang, “Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses,” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 603–605, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. K. Parmar, V. Torri, and L. Stewart, “Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 2815–2834, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. F. Tierney, L. A. Stewart, D. Ghersi, S. Burdett, and M. R. Sydes, “Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis,” Trials, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 16, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. Rajwa, M. Zyczkowski, A. Paradysz, K. Bujak, and P. Bryniarski, “Evaluation of the prognostic value of LMR, PLR, NLR, and dNLR in urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 3027–3037, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. D'Andrea, M. Moschini, K. M. Gust et al., “Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as biomarkers for predicting lymph node metastasis and survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 455–461, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Yoshida, H. Kinoshita, K. Yoshida et al., “A novel risk stratification model, involving preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio and standard pathological factors, for overall survival in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy,” Japanese journal of clinical oncology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1162–1167, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. M. Zhang, Y. Zhu, L. Luo et al., “Preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios as predictors of overall survival in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy,” Tumour Biology, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 8537–8543, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Temraz, D. Mukherji, Z. A. A. Farhat et al., “Preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a retrospective analysis,” BMC Urology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 76, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Wang, A. Baihetiya, and X. D. Li, “Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio predict the prognosis of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer,” Journal of Modern Urology, vol. 24, pp. 1–7, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  25. J. S. Palumbo and J. L. Degen, “Mechanisms coupling the hemostatic system to colitis-associated cancer,” Thrombosis research, vol. 125, Supplement 2, pp. S39–S43, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Mantovani, P. Allavena, A. Sica, and F. Balkwill, “Cancer-related inflammation,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7203, pp. 436–444, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Bastid, N. Bonnefoy, J. F. Eliaou, and A. Bensussan, “Lymphocyte-derived interleukin-17A adds another brick in the wall of inflammation-induced breast carcinogenesis,” Oncoimmunology, vol. 3, no. 4, article e28273, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. J. Chen, L. Zhou, H. Y. Xie, T. E. Ahmed, X. W. Feng, and S. S. Zheng, “Intratumoral regulatory T cells alone or in combination with cytotoxic T cells predict prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection,” Medical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1817–1826, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Zhou, T. Ding, W. Pan, L. Y. Zhu, L. Li, and L. Zheng, “Increased intratumoral regulatory T cells are related to intratumoral macrophages and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 1640–1648, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. A. Zikos, A. D. Donnenberg, R. J. Landreneau, J. D. Luketich, and V. S. Donnenberg, “Lung T-cell subset composition at the time of surgical resection is a prognostic indicator in non-small cell lung cancer,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 819–827, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. Minami, T. Minami, N. Shimizu et al., “Identification of programmed death ligand 1-derived peptides capable of inducing cancer-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes from HLA-A24+ patients with renal cell carcinoma,” Journal of Immunotherapy, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 285–291, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Chanmee, P. Ontong, K. Konno, and N. Itano, “Tumor-associated macrophages as major players in the tumor microenvironment,” Cancers, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1670–1690, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Yang, Z. Li, M. Ren et al., “Stromal infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages conferring poor prognosis of patients with basal-like breast carcinoma,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 2308–2316, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. J. Zhang, X. H. Wang, S. T. Gao et al., “Tumor-associated macrophages correlate with phenomenon of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and contribute to poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients,” The Journal of surgical research., vol. 222, pp. 93–101, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Jian-ying Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.