Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 509482, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/509482
Research Article

Inhibitory Effect of Chrysanthemum zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura Extract on RANKL-Induced Osteoclast Differentiation

1Center for Metabolic Function Regulation (CMFR), Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
2Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
3Department of Oral Biochemistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, 344-2 Shinyong-dong, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
4Department of Oral Physiology, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea
5Department of Oriental Medical Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan 570-749, Republic of Korea

Received 1 August 2013; Accepted 22 August 2013

Academic Editor: Yong-Ouk You

Copyright © 2013 Dong Ryun Gu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Chrysanthemum zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura, known as “Gujulcho” in Korea, has been used in traditional medicine to treat various inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. However, these effects have not been tested on osteoclasts, the bone resorbing cells that regulate bone metabolism. Here, we investigated the effects of C. zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura ethanol extract (CZE) on osteoclast differentiation induced by treatment with the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL). CZE inhibited osteoclast differentiation and formation in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect of CZE on osteoclastogenesis was due to the suppression of ERK activation and the ablation of RANKL-stimulated Ca2+-oscillation via the inactivation of PLCγ2, followed by the inhibition of CREB activation. These inhibitory effects of CZE resulted in a significant repression of c-Fos expression and a subsequent reduction of NFATc1, a key transcription factor for osteoclast differentiation, fusion, and activation in vitro and in vivo. These results indicate that CZE negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation and may be a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of various bone diseases, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and periodontitis.

1. Introduction

Bone remodeling and metabolism are maintained by a sophisticated regulation between osteoblasts, bone matrix-forming cells, and osteoclasts, bone-resorbing cells [1, 2]. Imbalance between these cells is implicated in the development of bone diseases accompanied by low bone mineral density and bone destruction, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis, periodontitis, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which are caused by excessive differentiation and activation of osteoclasts [35].

Osteoclasts are differentiated from hematopoietic macrophage/monocyte lineage precursor cells in several steps, including proliferation, differentiation, fusion, and activation [2]. Together with the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), which is mainly produced by osteoblasts, has been established as a pivotal osteoclast differentiation factor [6, 7]. In RANKL-stimulated osteoclastogenesis, a signal of RANKL binding to its receptor molecules, receptor activator of nuclear factor NF-κB (RANK) expressed on osteoclasts, is transduced into intercellular molecules through TRAF6 adaptor molecule. Thereafter, the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), p38, Akt, and NF-κB are activated via RANKL/RANK interaction [1]. Subsequent upregulation of c-Fos expression, a positive modulator of osteoclast differentiation, is followed by c-Fos binding to the NFATc1 promoter region, which induces NFATc1 expression, a master key transcription factor for osteoclastogenesis [810]. In addition, RANKL/RANK interaction activates immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) bearing adaptor molecules, such as DNAX-activating protein 12 (DAP12) and Fc receptor common γ subunit (FcRγ), followed by activation of phospholipase C-gamma (PLCγ) [11]. Activation of PLCγ leads to the generation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) from phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). Binding of IP3 to inositol trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane mobilizes Ca2+ from the ER stores to the cytosol, causing Ca2+-oscillation, which is important for osteoclast differentiation [12, 13]. Ca2+-oscillation induces the activation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaMK)IV and cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB), subsequently leading to induced c-Fos and NFATc1 expression [14]. This CaMKIV/CREB/NFATc1 pathway is also critical to osteoclast differentiation and function [15].

Chrysanthemum zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura (Compositae), colloquially known as “Gujulcho” in Korea, has been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of various diseases, including cough, common cold, bladder-related disorders, gastroenteric disorders, hypertension, and inflammatory diseases, such as pneumonia, bronchitis, pharyngitis, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [16, 17]. C. zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura extract (CZE) has been shown to harbor many pharmacological properties, including anticancer, antiallergic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidative stress activities, along with protective effects against liver damage [1722].

Many previously published studies indicate that inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1, IL-17, IFN-γ, and IL-4, which are produced during successful T-cell-based immune responses, directly regulate RANKL expression on osteoblasts as well as osteoclastogenesis and that inflammation affects bone metabolism [1, 3]. Although CZE has an anti-inflammatory activity, the effect of CZE on bone metabolism has rarely been reported, with the exception that linarin, a component of CZE, prevents hydrogen peroxide-induced dysfunction in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells [23]. However, its effect on osteoclasts still remains unclear.

In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effect of CZE on osteoclastogenesis and provided basic mechanisms and possibilities for the use of CZE as a traditional remedy against bone diseases, including osteoporosis, RA, and periodontitis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

C57BL/6J (Orient Bio Inc., SeungNam, Korea) were used to generate osteoclasts and for all other experiments. All mouse studies were performed using protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Wonkwang University.

2.2. Reagents

The 95% ethanol CZE was purchased from Korean Plant Extract Bank (Daejeon, Korea). All cell culture media, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and supplements were purchased from Hyclone (Rockford, IL, USA). Soluble recombinant mouse RANKL was purified from insect cells as described previously [24], and recombinant human M-CSF was supplied by T Kim (KIOM, Daejeon, Korea). Antibodies against p-ERK, p-JNK, p-p38, p-IκBα, p-PLCγ2, p-CREB, ERK, JNK, p38, IκBα, PLCγ2, and CREB were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-NFATc1 and anti-c-Fos antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA).

2.3. Cell Viability Assay

Cell viability assays were performed using the EZ-Cytox Enhanced Cell Viability Assay Kit, (Itsbio, Korea), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs), which act as osteoclast precursors, were plated in 96-well culture plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well with various concentrations of CZE (0, 2, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μg/mL) for 1 day, or they were cultured with 25 μg/mL of CZE under M-CSF treatment for 4 days. Cells were incubated with EZ-Cytox reagent for 4 h at 37°C. After incubation, the optical density was measured using an ELISA reader (Sunrise, Tecan, Switzerland) at 450 nm.

2.4. In Vitro Osteoclast Differentiation

Murine osteoclasts were prepared from bone marrow cells (BM) as previously described [25]. BMs were collected from the tibiae and femora of 6–8-week-old mice by flushing the marrow space with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). BMs were cultured with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) for 3 days in α-minimal essential medium (α-MEM) containing 10% FBS, and attached cells were harvested and used as osteoclasts precursors (BMMs). To generate osteoclasts, BMMs were cultured with M-CSF (50 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL) for 4 days. Fresh α-MEM containing M-CSF and RANKL was replaced on day 3. Cells were fixed with 10% formalin and stained for TRAP. TRAP positive-multinuclear cells (TRAP+ MNCs) containing more than three nuclei were counted as osteoclasts. In some experiments, total TRAP activity using p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma, USA) as a substrate was measured at an absorbance of 405 nm as previously described [25].

2.5. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

BMMs treated with or without CZE were cultured with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL) for 4 days as described above. Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells by using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) on the indicated days. Then, 1 μg of the total RNA was transcribed to first strand cDNA with random primers using Maxima Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Scientific, IL, USA) according to the protocol provided by the supplier. Real-time PCR was performed using the VeriQuest SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Affymetrix, USA) and StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, USA). To control for variation in mRNA concentrations, all results were normalized to the GAPDH housekeeping gene. Relative quantitation was performed using the comparative method, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Nucleotide sequences of the primers used for real-time PCR in this study.
2.6. Western Blot Analysis

BMMs were cultured with M-CSF (50 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of CZE for the indicated time. The cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed in 100 ul of radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) contained with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), protease-inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Germany), and phosphatase inhibitor tablets (Thermo Scientific, USA). The cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were collected for immunoblotting. Total lysates (30 μg) were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Amersham Hybond-P, GE-Healthcare Life Science, USA). Each membrane was blocked for 2 h with 5% skim milk in TBST (TBS; 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween-20) and then incubated with the 1 : 1000 dilution of the primary antibody. HRP-conjugated IgG (1 : 5000 dilutions) was used as the secondary antibody. The immunoreactive proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Thermo Scientific, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The bands detected were quantitated with the NIH imaging program (NIH Image 1.62), as previously described [26].

2.7. Measurement of Ca2+-Oscillation

Ca2+-oscillation in osteoclasts by RANKL stimulation was measured as previously described with minor modification [27]. BMMs were cultured on the cover slips with RANKL in the presence or absence of CZE (25 μg/mL). After 24 h of RANKL stimulation, intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was measured using the fluorescence Ca2+ indicator, Fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester (Fura-2AM, 5 μM; TEFLabs, USA). In some cases, BMMs were cultured with RANKL in the absence of CZE for 1 day, and then treated with CZE to verify the acute effects of CZE at the indicated times. Cells were loaded with Fura-2AM for 50 min at room temperature and placed on a chamber connected with a perfusion system. Unloaded fluorescent dye was washed out with bath solution (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM glucose; 310 milliosmole). With continuous perfusion of bath solution (37°C), the intracellular fluorescence intensity was measured using two excitation wavelengths (340 and 380 nm), and the emitted fluorescence (510 nm) was captured using a CCD camera. Collected images were digitized and analyzed by MetaFluor software (Ratio = F340/F380).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the Student’s two-tailed -test and are presented as mean ± SD values, as indicated. A value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All experiments were repeated at least twice and representative data are shown.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of CZE on Cell Viability

To assess the cytotoxicity of CZE on osteoclast precursors, BMMs were treated with various concentrations of CZE (0, 2, 5, 10, 25, or 50 μg/mL) for 1 day. Various concentrations of CZE, up to 50 μg/mL, did not affect the viability of BMMs (Figure 1(a)). All tested concentrations of CZE were shown to have viability levels comparable with that of control. In addition, BMMs were treated with 25 μg/mL of CZE for 4 days. Cell viability was measured daily. There was no significant difference of viability between the control and CZE (25 μg/mL)-treated cells during the 4 days of culture (Figure 1(b)).

fig1
Figure 1: Effects of Chrysanthemum zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura extract (CZE) on cell viability. (a) BMMs were cultured with indicated concentrations of CZE for 1 day. (b) BMMs were cultured with 25 μg/mL CZE or without (control) for 4 days. Cell viability was measured as described in the materials and methods. Data are the mean of three independent experiments ( SD).
3.2. Inhibitory Effect of CZE on Osteoclast Differentiation

To investigate the effect of CZE on osteoclast differentiation, BMMs were cultured with various concentrations of CZE under RANKL treatment for 4 days. Osteoclast differentiation was measured by TRAP staining and TRAP solution assay as previously described. TRAP+ MNCs containing more than 3 nuclei and bigger than 100 μm in diameter were counted as mature osteoclasts. CZE treatment dramatically inhibited the formation of mature osteoclasts from BMMs in a dose-dependent manner (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). When the CZE exceeded 25 μg/mL, mature osteoclasts were rarely formed. In addition, total TRAP activity from mono-, di- and multinuclear osteoclasts was significantly decreased as the CZE concentration increased (Figure 2(c)). These data suggest that the role of CZE is to repress osteoclast differentiation from the precursor cells to mature osteoclasts, and that it is not involved with the osteoclast fusion and activation steps.

509482.fig.002
Figure 2: Effects of CZE on osteoclast differentiation. BMMs were cultured with various concentrations of CZE under RANKL and M-CSF treatment for 4 days. (a) Osteoclasts were stained for TRAP. (b) TRAP+ multinuclear cells (MNCs) with more than 3 nuclei were counted as mature osteoclasts. (c) Total TRAP activity from TRAP+-mono-, di- and multinuclear cells was measured as described in the materials and methods. Data are expressed as the mean SD and are representative of at least three independent experiments. * , ** , and versus control (0 μg/mL CZE). Scale bar = 200 μm.

To confirm the inhibitory effect of CZE on osteoclast differentiation, the expression of osteoclast differentiation marker genes (Acp5, Oscar, CtsK, Tm7sf4, and Atp6v0d2) and a master transcription factor for osteoclast differentiation, Nfatc1, were measured during RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation. As shown in Figure 3, CZE significantly inhibited the expression of all tested marker genes and Nfatc1. Together with Figure 1, these results indicate that CZE has an inhibitory effect on RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and formation without cytotoxicity.

fig3
Figure 3: Effects of CZE on the expression of osteoclast differentiation marker genes. BMMs were cultured with RANKL and M-CSF treatment in the presence or absence of CZE (25 μg/mL) for 4 days. The expression of osteoclast differentiation marker genes was measured by real-time PCR. The expression of mRNA levels was normalized with GAPDH and described as fold change of mRNA level. Data are expressed as the mean SD and are representative of at least three independent experiments. * , and versus control (0 μg/mL CZE).
3.3. Suppression of c-Fos and NFATc1 Expression via ERK Inactivation by CZE

In RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation, RANKL/RANK signaling induces the activation of NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), followed by c-Fos expression, which results in the induction of NFATc1, a key transcription factor for osteoclastogenesis [1]. Therefore, we investigated the effect of CZE on the regulation of RANKL-induced signaling pathways. First, the BMMs were treated with or without CZE (25 μg/mL) under RANKL and M-CSF treatment, and then, the activation of MAPKs and IκBα was measured by western blot analysis. As shown in Figure 4(a), the phosphorylation of ERK diminished in the CZE-treated cells compared to that of control cells. However, the activation of IκBα and other MAPKs (JNK and p38) was not significantly changed. Next, we measured the expression levels of c-Fos and NFATc1. When CZE was treated, the expression of c-Fos was dramatically repressed 6 h after treatment in osteoclast differentiation (Figure 4(b)). In addition, the induction of NFATc1 was significantly inhibited by CZE treatment (Figure 4(c)), coinciding with mRNA expression patterns (Figure 3). These results indicate that CZE inhibited the expression of c-Fos via the inactivation of ERK in RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation. This inactivation leads to the repression of the expression of NFATc1, which regulates all the steps involved in osteoclast differentiation, fusion, and activation.

509482.fig.004
Figure 4: Effects of CZE on RANKL-induced intracellular signaling and the expression of transcription factors in osteoclasts. BMMs were treated with M-CSF and RANKL in the presence or absence of CZE (25 μg/mL) for the indicated time. Lysate (30 μg) was subjected to SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting. (a) MAPK (ERK, JNK, and p38) activation was measured by using their respective antibodies. (b)-(c) The expression of c-Fos and NFATc1 was detected by anti-c-Fos and NFATc1 antibody, respectively. Fold change normalized by actin is presented in the right panel. Data are representatively obtained from three independent experiments and are expressed as the mean SD. * , and versus control (0 μg/mL CZE).
3.4. Breakdown of Intracellular Ca2+-Oscillation and Inhibition of PLCγ2 and CREB Activation by CZE

In addition to MAPK and NF-κB activation, RANKL/RANK signaling also activate phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLCγ2) and induces Ca2+-oscillation, followed by CREB activation [14, 25, 28]. CREB is critical for RANKL-stimulated NFATc1 and c-Fos induction in osteoclast precursors [14]. We first examined whether CZE affects the induction of Ca2+-oscillation by RANKL stimulation. BMMs were cultured with or without CZE under RANKL stimulation for 24 h. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration was measured as described previously. Control cells exhibited typical Ca2+-oscillation as shown in Figure 5(a). However, CZE-treated cells showed an irregular Ca2+-oscillation pattern with significantly increased intensity, but without increased frequency (Figure 5(b)). In addition, we acutely added CZE on control cells showing typical Ca2+-oscillation and then measured Ca2+ mobilization. As shown in Figure 5(c), Ca2+-oscillation was defective in these cells, with a large Ca2+ influx peak after CZE treatment. It seems that CZE may interact with some Ca2+ channels, which contributes to a substantial Ca2+ influx into the cells. We next examined whether RANKL-stimulated PLCγ2 activation is affected by CZE treatment. Phosphorylation of PLCγ2 in CZE-treated cells was significantly inhibited. In addition, the activation of CREB by RANKL was dramatically suppressed during osteoclast differentiation in CZE-treated cells. Collectively, these data demonstrate that CZE regulates not only MAPKs and NF-κB activation, but also PLCγ2 activation and RANKL-induced Ca2+-oscillation, which are important for CREB activation and c-Fos and NFATc1 induction in RANKL-stimulated osteoclast differentiation (Figure 6).

fig5
Figure 5: Effect of CZE in RANKL-stimulated costimulatory signals in osteoclasts. BMMs were cultured with M-CSF and RANKL in the presence or absence of CZE (25 μg/mL) for 1 day. (a)-(b) RANKL-induced Ca2+-oscillation was measured with the Ca2+ indicator, Fura-2AM. (c) BMMs were cultured with M-CSF and RANKL in the presence of CZE for 1 day. RANKL-induced Ca2+-oscillation by acute treatment of CZE was measured. (d)-(e) BMMs were cultured with M-CSF and RANKL in presence or absence of CZE (25 μg/mL) for the indicated time. Lysate (30 μg) was subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the activation of PLCγ2 (d) and CREB (e) was analyzed by immunoblotting. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
509482.fig.006
Figure 6: Schematic diagram of the effect of CZE on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. RANKL/RANK interaction may lead to the activation of MAPKs followed by c-Fos expression and alternatively activation of PLC 2 inducing calcium signaling, which is critical for NFATc1 activation, followed by CREB activation and induction of c-Fos and NFATc1. CZE inhibited both RANKL-induced ERK and PLCγ activation signaling pathways.

4. Discussion

Although C. zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura has routinely been used as a traditional remedy against several inflammatory diseases and the mechanisms for its anti-inflammatory effects have been studied [16, 17], comparatively little is known about its effect against inflammation-related bone diseases such as RA and periodontitis or on bone cells (osteoclasts and osteoblasts). Only the effect of linarin on osteoblastic MC3T3 cells has been reported that it inhibits cytotoxicity and oxidative damage, and restores the mineralization function of hydrogen peroxide-treated osteoblasts. Linarin also suppresses RANKL expression induced by hydrogen peroxide and appears to have antiresorptive activity [23]. Here, we have elucidated an inhibitory effect of CZE via the reduction of NFATc1 expression in the differentiation and formation of osteoclasts, which cause bone destruction associated with inflammation-related bone diseases.

Previously, many studies have established that NFATc1 is a critical transcription factor for RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation, fusion, and activation. When BMMs are stimulated by RANKL, the expression of NFATc1 is induced through c-Fos and autoamplification by NFATc1 [9, 10]. NFATc1-deficient embryonic stem cells do not form mature osteoclasts by RANKL treatment and overexpression of ectopic ca-NFATc1 in BMMs appropriately induces osteoclast differentiation from BMMs even in the absence of RANKL [9, 25, 29]. Recently, we had reported that NFATc1 is a key regulator of osteoclast fusion, which is an essential step for efficient bone resorption, via upregulation of ATP6v0d2 and dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP), which are known as osteoclast fusion molecules as confirmed by genetic experiments [29]. Moreover, several reports showed that NFATc1 is implicated in the regulation of osteoclast function. The expression of TRAP, Cathepsin K, c-Src, and β3 integrin, which are involved in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, is regulated by NFATc1 [9, 10, 12]. Furthermore, acidosis and RANKL signals in osteoclasts stimulate bone resorption via activation of Ca2+/calcineurin/NFAT pathway [30]. These results indicate that NFATc1 is a master key regulator of osteoclastogenesis. Therefore, in order to regulate excessive osteoclasts activity, which causes severe bone destruction in bone diseases, it is efficient and essential to control the expression of NFATc1 as a therapeutic target. In this study, our data demonstrate that CZE suppresses the expression of c-Fos and NFATc1 via inactivation of ERK, which contribute to RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation (Figure 4).

Previous studies elucidated that Ca2+-oscillation for NFATc1 induction is an essential process for osteoclastogenesis, and that ablation of Ca2+-oscillation causes impairment of osteoclastogenesis [12, 31, 32]. RANKL-stimulated Ca2+-oscillation is initiated approximately 24 h after RANKL treatment and is maintained until the formation of mature osteoclasts [15]. It seems that long-term Ca2+-oscillation is helpful for sustaining NFATc1 in the nucleus and for ensuring the transcriptional activation of NFATc1 required for terminal osteoclast differentiation [33]. Intracellular Ca2+ originates from the extracellular space through plasma membrane channels or intracellular organelles such as the ER [34]. IP3 receptors (IP3Rs), especially IP3R2 and IP3R3 in osteoclasts, mediate Ca2+ release from the ER to the cytosol in response to IP3 binding [13]. Recently, it has been reported that the Ca2+ influx during osteoclastogenesis is regulated by plasma membrane-localized Ca2+ channels, such as Orai1, TRPV4, and TRPV5 [3537].

In Figure 5, BMMs treated with RANKL for 1 day produced typical Ca2+-oscillation. However, when BMMs were treated with CZE under RANKL stimulation for 1 day, the typical Ca2+-oscillation was interrupted; instead, abnormal biphasic pick, which is thought to be mediated by Ca2+ influx, was induced. In addition, when RANKL-stimulated BMMs showing typical Ca2+-oscillation were acutely treated with CZE, an abnormal biphasic pick, implicating dramatically increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration, [Ca2+]i was produced, and the typical Ca2+-oscillation by RANKL disappeared. Although it is unknown how CZE induces abnormal Ca2+ influx in osteoclasts, CZE definitely ablated the typical Ca2+-oscillation induced by RANKL stimulation. In addition, CZE inhibited PLCγ2 and CREB activation, which are important for osteoclast differentiation, followed by the repression of c-Fos and NFATc1 expression. These results indicate that CZE is an effective regulator of osteoclast differentiation and formation via the control of two main pathways induced by RANKL/RANK binding. In further studies, it will be interesting to explore how CZE regulates Ca2+ influx and which Ca2+ channel is affected by CZE. Detailed investigations of this mechanism will provide more insights into the effect of CZE on osteoclastogenesis and its relationship with the pathologies of bone diseases, such as osteoporosis, periodontitis, and rheumatoid arthritis.

5. Conclusion

Our results clearly demonstrate that the inhibitory effect of CZE on RANKL-stimulated osteoclastogenesis is mediated by the repression of c-Fos and NFATc1 expression, which are critical for osteoclastogenesis, via ERK and PLCγ/Ca2+-oscillation/CREB signaling in osteoclasts. These findings reveal CZE as a traditional therapeutic agent against inflammatory bone diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Dong Ryun Gu and Jin-ki Hwang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIP) to Y. R. Lee (no. 2011-0030716) and to S. H. Lee (no. 2011-0030719) and funded by the Ministry of Education to S. H. Lee (no. 2012R1A1A4A01012975).

References

  1. M. C. Walsh, N. Kim, Y. Kadono et al., “Osteoimmunology: interplay between the immune system and bone metabolism,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 24, pp. 33–63, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. J. Boyle, W. S. Simonet, and D. L. Lacey, “Osteoclast differentiation and activation,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6937, pp. 337–342, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Lorenzo, M. Horowitz, and Y. Choi, “Osteoimmunology: interactions of the bone and immune system,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 403–440, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Schett, “Osteoimmunology in rheumatic diseases,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 11, no. 1, article 210, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Takayanagi, “Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 292–304, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Kong, H. Yoshida, I. Sarosi et al., “OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis,” Nature, vol. 397, no. 6717, pp. 315–323, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Yasuda, N. Shima, N. Nakagawa et al., “Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/ osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 3597–3602, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. L. Teitelbaum and F. P. Ross, “Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 638–649, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Takayanagi, S. Kim, T. Koga et al., “Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts,” Developmental Cell, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 889–901, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Asagiri, K. Sato, T. Usami et al., “Autoamplification of NFATc1 expression determines its essential role in bone homeostasis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 202, no. 9, pp. 1261–1269, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Shinohara, T. Koga, K. Okamoto et al., “Tyrosine kinases Btk and Tec regulate osteoclast differentiation by linking RANK and ITAM signals,” Cell, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 794–806, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Koga, M. Inui, K. Inoue et al., “Costimulatory signals mediated by the ITAM motif cooperate with RANKL for bone homeostasis,” Nature, vol. 428, no. 6984, pp. 758–763, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Kuroda, C. Hisatsune, T. Nakamura, K. Matsuo, and K. Mikoshiba, “Osteoblasts induce Ca2+ oscillation-independent NFATc1 activation during osteoclastogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 25, pp. 8643–8648, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Sato, A. Suematsu, T. Nakashima et al., “Regulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the CaMK-CREB pathway,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1410–1416, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Negishi-Koga and H. Takayanagi, “Ca2+-NFATc1 signaling is an essential axis of osteoclast differentiation,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 241–256, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. S. Woo, J. S. Yu, I. G. Hwang et al., “Antioxidative activity of volatile compounds in flower of Chrysanthemum indicum, C. morifolium, and C. zawadskii,” Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 805–809, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. S. Kwon, T. J. Ha, S. W. Hwang et al., “Cytotoxic flavonoids from the whole plants of Chrysanthemum zawadskii Herbich var. latilobum Kitamura,” Journal of Life Science, vol. 16, pp. 746–749, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. H. Lee, J. Y. Seo, N. Y. Ko et al., “Inhibitory activity of Chrysanthemi sibirici herba extract on RBL-2H3 mast cells and compound 48/80-induced anaphylaxis,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 95, no. 2-3, pp. 425–430, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Han, K. Sung, D. Yim et al., “The effect of linarin on LPS-induced cytokine production and nitric oxide inhibition in murine macrophages cell line RAW264.7,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 170–177, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Kim, J. Han, J. Sung et al., “Anti-inflammatory activity of Chrysanthemum zawadskii var. latilobum leaf extract through haem oxygenase-1 induction,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 474–479, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Wu, T. O. Khor, C. L. L. Saw et al., “Anti-inflammatory/anti-oxidative stress activities and differential regulation of Nrf2-mediated genes by non-polar fractions of tea Chrysanthemum zawadskii and licorice Glycyrrhiza uralensis,” AAPS Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Y. Seo, S. S. Lim, J. Park et al., “Protection by Chrysanthemum zawadskii extract from liver damage of mice caused by carbon tetrachloride is maybe mediated by modulation of QR activity,” Nutrition Research and Practice, vol. 4, pp. 93–98, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. H. Kim, Y. S. Lee, and E. M. Choi, “Linarin isolated from Buddleja officinalis prevents hydrogen peroxide-induced dysfunction in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 268, no. 2, pp. 112–116, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Kim, P. R. Odgren, D. Kim, S. C. Marks Jr., and Y. Choi, “Diverse roles of the tumor necrosis factor family member TRANCE in skeletal physiology revealed by TRANCE deficiency and partial rescue by a lymphocyte-expressed TRANCE transgene,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 20, pp. 10905–10910, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. H. Lee, T. Kim, D. Jeong, N. Kim, and Y. Choi, “The Tec family tyrosine kinase Btk regulates RANKL-induced osteoclast maturation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 17, pp. 11526–11534, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Lee, J. Rho, D. Jeong et al., “V-ATPase V0 subunit d2-deficient mice exhibit impaired osteoclast fusion and increased bone formation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1403–1409, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Kim, T. Kim, B. C. Jeong et al., “Tmem64 modulates calcium signaling during RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 17, pp. 249–260, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  28. T. Wada, T. Nakashima, N. Hiroshi, and J. M. Penninger, “RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Kim, S. Lee, H. K. Jung, Y. Choi, and N. Kim, “NFATc1 induces osteoclast fusion via up-regulation of Atp6v0d2 and the Dendritic Cell-Specific Transmembrane Protein (DC-STAMP),” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 176–185, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. V. Komarova, A. Pereverzev, J. W. Shum, S. M. Sims, and S. J. Dixon, “Convergent signaling by acidosis and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) on the calcium/calcineurin/NFAT pathway in osteoclasts,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 2643–2648, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Yang and Y. Li, “RGS10-null mutation impairs osteoclast differentiation resulting from the loss of [Ca2+]i oscillation regulation,” Genes and Development, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 1803–1816, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Gohda, T. Akiyama, T. Koga, H. Takayanagi, S. Tanaka, and J. Inoue, “RANK-mediated amplification of TRAF6 signaling to NFATc1 induction during osteoclastogenesis,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 790–799, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Koga, Y. Matsui, M. Asagiri et al., “NFAT and Osterix cooperatively regulate bone formation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 880–885, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. D. Bootman and M. J. Berridge, “The elemental principles of calcium signaling,” Cell, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 675–678, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. J. Robinson, S. Mancarella, D. Songsawad et al., “Gene disruption of the calcium channel Orai1 results in inhibition of osteoclast and osteoblast differentiation and impairs skeletal development,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 92, pp. 1071–1083, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  36. R. Masuyama, J. Vriens, T. Voets et al., “TRPV4-mediated calcium influx regulates terminal differentiation of osteoclasts,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 257–265, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. C. J. van der Eerden, J. G. J. Hoenderop, T. J. de Vries et al., “The epithelial Ca2+ channel TRPV5 is essential for proper osteoclastic bone resorption,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 48, pp. 17507–17512, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus