International Journal of Hypertension

International Journal of Hypertension / 2010 / Article
Special Issue

Genetics of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 865031 |

Georgios D. Kitsios, Elias Zintzaras, "An NOS3 Haplotype Is Protective against Hypertension in a Caucasian Population", International Journal of Hypertension, vol. 2010, Article ID 865031, 7 pages, 2010.

An NOS3 Haplotype Is Protective against Hypertension in a Caucasian Population

Academic Editor: Tomohiro Katsuya
Received04 Dec 2009
Accepted13 Feb 2010
Published25 Mar 2010


The endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene (NOS3) has been implicated in the development of hypertension, although the specific role of variants and haplotypes has not been clarified. In this study, the association of three polymorphisms (promoter T786C, intronic 4a/b, and nonsynonymous G894T) was tested in a case-control sample of 230 patients with essential hypertension and 306 healthy controls. Haplotype analysis was also performed. The mutant allele of the 4a/b polymorphism showed a protective effect against hypertension under a dominant model (odds , 95% confidence interval (0.44–0.93)), although this effect was not significant after the adjustment for covariates ( ). The estimated frequency of the haplotype composed of the , 4 , and alleles was significantly higher in controls (5.5%) compared to cases (2%). These results indicate that although individual NOS3 polymorphisms are not associated with hypertension, a rare haplotype of the gene might be protective against the development of hypertension.

1. Introduction

Hypertension is a multifactorial disorder resulting from complex interactions between genetic and environmental contributions. An increase in vascular resistance and impairment of endothelial-dependent vasodilatation are involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Nitric oxide (NO) synthesis by the vascular endothelium is important for the regulation of vasodilator tone and control of blood pressure in humans [1, 2]. Given the pivotal role of NO in vascular homeostasis, the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene (NOS3) has emerged as a logical candidate gene in the investigation of hypertension genetics [3].

Variants of the NOS3 gene located in the 7q35-q36 region have been investigated for association with hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders [3]. Among them, three polymorphisms have been widely examined for clinical relevance, based on their potential functional effects and their relatively high minor allele frequency in various ethnic groups [3, 4]: (i) a G894T substitution in exon 7 resulting in a Glu to Asp substitution at codon 298 (rs1799983), (ii) an insertion-deletion in intron 4 (4a/b) consisting of two alleles (the a*-deletion which has four tandem 27-bp repeats and the b*-insertion having five repeats), and (iii) a T786C substitution in the promoter region (rs2070744). In a survey of all published association studies on the relation between the NOS3 gene polymorphisms and the risk of hypertension, a meta-analysis and subsequent sensitivity analyses supported an association only for the 4a/b polymorphism and hypertension [5]. Most of the studies in the field had investigated the effects of individual polymorphisms and reported marginal or even controversial associations. However, accumulating evidence shows that significant interactions between individual NOS3 polymorphisms have a major influence on NO formation [6, 7], and consequently an analysis of haplotypes (and not individual NOS3 polymorphisms) is expected to be a more powerful approach for detecting genetic susceptibility to hypertension [8, 9].

In order to replicate [10] the association described in the above meta-analysis [5] and explore the effects of NOS3 haplotypes on the risk of developing hypertension, we performed a case-control study to test for association between NOS3 polymorphisms (or haplotypes) and hypertension. We focused on the three previously studied polymorphisms (T786C, 4a/b, and G894T) because of their potential functional implications, their high minor allele frequency, and the extensive publication record on them that would allow for meaningful comparisons [3, 4]. The study presented here was conducted in a case-control sample from a homogeneous population of Caucasian origin (Greeks).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

All consecutive hypertensive patients presenting in our recruitment centers (primary care practices and outpatient clinics) were systematically evaluated for fulfillment of the following inclusion criteria: (1) patient age more than 20 years, (2) age-at-onset of hypertension before 60 years of age (in order to obtain a phenotype with enriched genetic component) [11], (3) established hypertension defined either as long-term treatment of the disease or in those previously untreated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) more than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) more than 90 mmHg, (4) documented absence of secondary forms of hypertension after clinical and laboratory work up (such as renal, renovascular or endocrine disease) and (5) absence of diabetes mellitus. A total of 230 nondiabetic patients with essential hypertension were finally recruited. Each patient’s medical history was obtained using a standardized questionnaire regarding the lifestyle, smoking (current or ex-smokers), alcohol or drug intake. Medical history of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, and current medications was recorded. A complete physical examination was performed including measurement of supine SBP and DBP (using mercury column sphygmomanometers), electrocardiogram recording, and measurement of somatometric parameters (height, weight, body mass index (BMI)). Spouses and friends of cases were interviewed to assess their appropriateness for inclusion as a healthy control group. A group of 306 normotensive, healthy control subjects was also recruited according to the following criteria: (1) subject age more than 20 years, (2) absence of hypertension or antihypertensive treatment in the medical history, (3) SBP/DBP less than 140/90 mmHg, respectively, (4) absence of chronic illness (renal, cardiovascular, mental, hepatic, endocrine disorders or cancer) or concomitant chronic medication, and (5) unrelated by blood to cases. A blood sample for biochemical measurements and DNA extraction was taken from each participant. All participants provided written informed consent.

2.2. Laboratory Assays

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using the QIAamp DNA blood kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Genotyping of each polymorphism was performed by amplification from 50 to 100 ng of genomic DNA. The primer sequences used and the laboratory conditions for genotyping (polymerase chain reaction, restriction enzymes, agarose electrophoresis) for each NOS3 polymorphism have been previously described [12, 13]. Genotyping was performed by laboratory personnel blinded to clinical status.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software (v9.1 SAS Institute Inc, NC, USA). The values for clinical parameters are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The Student t-test and the chi-square test were used for comparisons of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Any result with P     .05 was considered statistically significant. The chi-square test with one degree of freedom was used in order to test whether the frequency distribution of genotypes in the control group was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (P     .05). Differences in genotype distribution and allele frequencies between hypertensive and control subjects were tested using the chi-square test. The association was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to adjust for the effects of covariates (age, gender, BMI, and smoking status) on the genotype-phenotype association. Addition of a squared term of age was found to improve model fit, as tested with the likelihood ratio test, and was therefore kept in the final model. For the regression models, the genetic effect of the mutant allele (786C*, 4a*, and 894T*, resp.) was assumed to be dominant (mutant carriers versus wild type homozygotes), or recessive (mutant homozygotes versus wild type carriers), or additive (mutant homozygotes versus wild type homozygotes) or codominant (heterozygotes versus homozygotes), for each NOS3 polymorphism [10]. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) and haplotype analysis were performed using the SHEsis and HAPSTAT software platforms [14, 15]. The order of variants in the inferred haplotypes was T786C, 4a/b, G894T, corresponding to the physical location of these variants in the NOS3 gene. The threshold haplotype frequency value for inclusion in the analysis was set at 3%. Sample size calculations were performed by using the Power Calculator for Genetic Studies [16]. A modest genetic effect ( ), and observed disease prevalence (30%), and minor allele frequencies (786C*  =  40%, 4a*  =  20% and 894T*  =  35%) in Caucasian populations were imputed [17]. Sufficient power ( 80%) to detect modest genetic effects was achieved with a sample of 230 cases and 306 controls for all three polymorphisms. A systematic review of the literature for studies investigating the association between NOS3 haplotypes and hypertension was also conducted and the individual study results were summarized.

3. Results

The main clinical and demographic characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 1. Age, male gender, BMI, SBP, DBP, creatinine, and urea concentration were significantly higher in cases compared to controls. Among cases, 28% suffered from coronary artery disease and almost 90% were treated by antihypertensive medications or statins.

Cases ( )Controls ( )P-value

Age (years)63.9 (9.4)40.8 (18.3) .05
Males, n (%)125 (54.4)68 (22.2) .05
BMI28.7 (4.1)27.5 (4.4) .05
Smokers, n (%)84 (36.5)80 (29.9)
SBP (mmHg)145.3 (15.7)124.4 (12.3) .05
DBP (mmHg)85.1 (10.2)68.8 (9.7) .05
PP (mmHg)59.3 (17.2)57.1 (14.1)
CAD, n (%)65 (28.3)N/A
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.09 (0.8)0.92 (0.9) .05
Urea (mg/dL)40.8 (8.6)36.5 (6.6) .05
Potassium (mmol/L)4.3 (0.5) 4.4 (0.3).26
Sodium (mmol/L)138.4 (3.1) 140.0 (4.5).38
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)190.88 (48.4)N/A
LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)113.7 (39.5)N/A
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)46.9 (17.8)N/A
Triglycerides (mg/dL)132.4 (64.5)N/A
Drug treatment (%)89.6N/A
ACE-inhibitors (%)45.2N/A
ARBs (%)29.0N/A
Beta-blockers (%)50.3N/A
CCBs (%)36.8N/A
Diuretics (%)50.9N/A
Nitrates (%)13.5N/A
Statins (%)39.7N/A

Values are mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise specified. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, PP = pulse pressure, CAD = coronary artery disease, LDL = low-density lipoprotein, HDL = high density lipoprotein, ACE = angiotensin converting enzyme, ARBs = angiotensin receptor blockers, CCBs = calcium channel blockers, N/A = nonapplicable.

Genotyping was successful in 96%, 99%, and 99% of subjects for the T786C, 4a/b and G894T polymorphisms, respectively. The genotype distributions and allele frequencies are shown in Table 2. The genotype distributions in the control group were in HWE for all polymorphisms ( and  .16 for T786C, 4a/b, and G894T polymorphisms, resp.). The genotype distribution differed significantly between cases and controls only for the intronic 4a/b polymorphism (Table 2). In univariate analysis under a dominant model, carriers of the mutant allele a* were 36% less likely to develop hypertension ( , 95% CI (0.44–0.93)) compared to homozygotes of the wild type allele (b*). However, this protective effect of the a* allele was no longer significant after adjustment for possible confounding variables using multiple regression analysis (adjusted , 95% CI (0.26–1.04)) (Table 3). No significant interaction between the a* allele carriership and smoking was observed ( ). The remaining analyses, both univariate and multivariate, did not show any significant association for the T786C and G894T polymorphisms and are shown in Table 3.

Cases, n (%)Controls, n (%)P-value

TT69 (30.4)101 (35.0)
TC118 (52.0)148 (51.2)
CC40 (17.6)40 (13.8).37(a)
T alleles246 (55.4)350 (60.6)
C alleles198 (44.6)228 (39.4).12(b)

Intron 4a/b
4b/b165 (72.4)190 (62.7)
4a/b59 (25.9)101 (33.3)
4a/a4 (1.7)12 (4.0).04(a)
b alleles389 (85.3)481 (79.4)
a alleles67 (14.7)125 (20.6).03(b)

GG99 (43.4)135 (44.7)
GT95 (41.7)130 (43.1)
TT34 (14.9)37 (12.2).67(a)
G alleles283 (63.5)400 (66.2)
T alleles163 (36.5)204 (33.8).39(b)

(a)P-value for the comparison of genotypic distribution. (b)P-value for the comparison of the allelic distribution.

OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

 Dominant model1.23 (0.85–1.79).281.30 (0.64–2.63).47
 Recessive model1.33 (0.83–2.15).240.77 (0.33–1.83).56
 Additive model1.46 (0.86–2.49).160.99 (0.38–2.62).98
 Codominant model1.03 (0.73–1.42).861.48 (0.75–2.93).26

Intron 4a/b
 Dominant model0.64 (0.44–0.93).020.52 (0.26–1.04).06
 Recessive model0.43 (0.14–1.36).150.49 (0.08–3.07).45
 Additive model0.38 (0.12–1.21).100.40 (0.06–2.78).35
 Codominant model0.69 (0.48–1.02).060.56 (0.28–1.13).10

 Dominant model1.05 (0.75–1.49).771.51 (0.78–2.92).22
 Recessive model1.25 (0.76–2.07).371.04 (0.38–2.77).94
 Additive model1.25 (0.74–2.14).411.28 (0.46–3.56).64
 Codominant model0.94 (0.67–1.34).751.51 (0.77–2.96).23

Pairwise LD among the three polymorphisms was measured by the Lewontin standardized disequilibrium coefficient and the squared correlation coefficient [18], in both groups separately. All pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant LD ( ), although strong LD (      0.8) was evident only for the 4a/b and G894T polymorphisms in the control group (Table 4).

PolymorphismsIntron 4a/bG894T

 Cases0.46(a) (0.05)(a)0.34(a) (0.09)(a)
 Controls0.44(a) (0.15)(a)0.51(a) (0.11)(a)

Intron 4a/b
 Cases0.44(a) (0.02)(a)
 Controls0.82(a) (0.09)(a)

(a) .

The distribution of the estimated haplotype frequencies for cases and controls is presented in Table 5. Six major haplotypes with frequencies % were identified. The global chi-square test for association of haplotypes showed that there was an overall significant difference between cases and controls ( ). This difference was due to the T-a-G* haplotype, which was more frequent in controls (5.5%) compared to cases (2%) ( ), conferring a protective effect against the development of hypertension. Exploration of possible interactions of the T-a-G* haplotype with confounding variables (age, sex, BMI, smoking status) did not detect any significant results (P-values ).

Haplotype(a)Cases (%)Controls (%)P-value

Global test of association.03

(a)The order of variants in the inferred haplotypes is [T786C-4a/b-G894T] in order to correspond to the physical location of these variants in the NOS3 gene.

The literature search identified nine previously published studies on the association between NOS3 haplotypes and hypertension [6, 7, 1925] and their results are provided in Table 6.

Study first author, year of publicationStudy population ethnicity, (Number of cases/Number of controls)Evidence for association with NOS3 haplotypesHaplotypes with statistically significant resultsDirection of haplotypic genetic effect

Sandrim, 2006CaucasiansYesT-b-T*Protective
Blacks (91/87)YesT-b-T*Protective

Sandrim, 2006MixedYesC-b-G*Protective

Zhao, 2006East-AsiansNo

Sandrim, 2006MixedYesC-b-G*Protective

Sandrim, 2007MixedYesC-b-G*Protective

Nejatizadeh, 2008 [6]Indian (455/345)YesT-a-G*Protective

Conen, 2008 [25]Caucasian (18436)No

Kumar, 2009 [19]Indian (440/470)YesT-a-G*Susceptibility

Vasconcellos, 2010 [20]CaucasiansYesC-b-G*Protective

4. Discussion

4.1. Novel Findings

This study evaluated relations between common genetic variants and haplotypes in the NOS3 gene with essential hypertension. The single locus analysis among the three most commonly studied polymorphisms revealed an association only for the 4a/b polymorphism. Contrary to what was anticipated, carriership of the mutant allele a* was associated with a 36% reduction in the risk of developing hypertension. A meta-analysis conducted by our group has previously shown a detrimental effect for the a* allele; based on unadjusted estimates, the a* allele was associated with an 22% increased risk for hypertension [5]. Interestingly, this association was confined in Caucasians. In the current study, the unadjusted analysis in a Caucasian population revealed an association in the opposite direction (protective effect of the a* allele). However, this association was not significant when the effects of potential confounders were taken into account with a multivariate logistic regression model. Additionally, previous reports have described that the 4a/b polymorphism effects can be smoking-dependent [26, 27]. No significant genotype-smoking interactions were found in our analysis. The lack of association for the G894T and T786C polymorphisms was in concordance with the meta-analysis results [5].

In the haplotype-based association analysis, the distribution of a relatively infrequent haplotype (T-a-G*) was found to be different between cases and controls, resulting in a protective effect against hypertension. The mutant allele of the 4a/b polymorphism is incorporated in this haplotype, along with the two wild type alleles of G894T and T786C polymorphisms. Although not significant in individual analyses, the point estimates of the genetic effects of the alleles involved in this haplotype were also in the protective direction (Table 3). This study could not provide any further information regarding the underlying culprit functional variation captured by this haplotype; however, the LD analysis showed evidence of strong LD between the 4a/b and the G894T polymorphisms in controls, which could potentially pinpoint a locus of interest.

4.2. Haplotype Testing in Hypertension

Testing of haplotypes overcomes some of the problems encountered with using single polymorphisms in genetic association studies, because the interaction of multiple genetic markers within a haplotype could be a key determinant of disease susceptibility rather than the individual polymorphism [28, 29]. The haplotype analysis approach is expected to be more powerful than single-marker analysis, because of the ancestral structure incarcerated in the distribution of haplotypes [9, 10]. Particularly if the markers used define mutations within functional DNA then the haplotypes composed of these markers can have more of a biological role. In accordance with this hypothesis, no significant associations were detected for the single-marker analysis promoter (T786C) and the nonsynonymous (G894T) variants used in our study, despite the fact that functionality analyses have demonstrated a role for both variants [3].

Previous studies have yielded contradictory results regarding the role of the T-a-G* haplotype that was found to be protective in our study, as shown in Table 6. Although no correlation with NO production has been detected [7], the T-a-G* has been reported to confer susceptibility to hypertension [19] or to be protective against gestational hypertension and preeclampsia [30]. Since the haplotypic structure has not been previously examined in the Greek population, it is possible that ethnicity may account for the observed discrepancies. The T-a-G* haplotype had a lower frequency in our study (2% and 5.5% in cases and controls) compared to previous reports (ranging from 6% to 20%) [19, 30].

For complex disorders as hypertension, the rare haplotypes have been recently shown to play a significant role in influencing disease susceptibility [31, 32]. Recent paradigms have also shown that hunting common variation will not probably suffice to track the “missing heritability” explained by variants detected in the genome-wide association era [33, 34]. Multiple rare pathogenic variants are also likely to be important determinants of complex disorders. Although such variants will not be detectable by current techniques based on the use of linked polymorphic markers, advances in genotyping technologies and novel genetic variation maps that capture rare variants (1,000 Genomes Project) will make whole-genome searches for rare variants feasible [35]. Findings from genome-wide agnostic approaches can nevertheless be complemented by prioritized results from additional venues of genomic research (genomic convergence) [36, 37] in order to select for replication studies the candidate genes with the stronger evidence support.

4.3. Study Limitations

Large sample sizes and independent replication are sine qua non principles for genetic epidemiology [10, 38]. Our findings are not supportive of a major contributory role of individual genetic polymorphisms but provide evidence for association for a rare haplotype. Given the logistic limitations of single centers, like ours, to recruit large numbers of participants and to replicate the association in multiple cohorts, it is important that the validity of the proposed association here is tested in other studies before scrutinizing the gene in search for causal variants. Additionally, complex disorders such as hypertension are considered to emerge from multiple epistatic and gene-environmental interactions [34]. Although the NOS3 gene is though to be involved in critical pathway interplays [39], our sample size did not allow the testing for interactions with sufficient power. Finally, the case-control design may have allowed for some elusive misclassification of controls, since the development of the disease is age-related. Replicating our hypothesis in large prospective studies could overcome these unavoidable limitations [38].

In conclusion, our genetic association study detected a protective effect of a rare NOS3 haplotype against hypertension. Although the underlying functional genetic variation in the NOS3 gene remains to be defined, haplotype-based analyses are expected to be more informative regarding the role of the NOS3 gene compared to single-marker analyses. Rare haplotypes and variants may not serve as markers of disease with clinical utility on a population-wide basis but they hold the potential to uncover critical pathways involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension and assist in defining novel molecular targets for intervention. Our results require replication in independent cohorts and additional studies in order to disentangle the molecular basis of the detected genetic effects.


  1. P. Vallance, J. Collier, and S. Moncada, “Effects of endothelium-derived nitric oxide on peripheral arteriolar tone in man,” The Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8670, pp. 997–1000, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. P. Cooke and V. J. Dzau, “Nitric oxide synthase: role in the genesis of vascular disease,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 48, pp. 489–509, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. P. Casas, G. L. Cavalleri, L. E. Bautista, L. Smeeth, S. E. Humphries, and A. D. Hingorani, “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular disease: a HuGE review,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 164, no. 10, pp. 921–935, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. E. Cooke, A. Doshi, and P. F. Binkley, “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene: prospects for treatment of heart disease,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1723–1734, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. Zintzaras, G. Kitsios, and I. Stefanidis, “Endothelial NO synthase gene polymorphisms and hypertension: a meta-analysis,” Hypertension, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 700–710, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Nejatizadeh, R. Kumar, T. Stobdan et al., “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene haplotypes and circulating nitric oxide levels significantly associate with risk of essential hypertension,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1912–1918, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. V. C. Sandrim, R. W. C. de Syllos, H. R. K. Lisboa, G. S. Tres, and J. E. Tanus-Santos, “Influence of eNOS haplotypes on the plasma nitric oxide products concentrations in hypertensive and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients,” Nitric Oxide: Biology and Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 348–355, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. E. Tanus-Santos and A. Casella-Filho, “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphisms and susceptibility to hypertension: genotype versus haplotype analysis,” Hypertension, vol. 49, no. 1, article e1, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. Zintzaras, G. Kitsios, and I. Stefanidis, “Response to endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphisms and susceptibility to hypertension: genotype versus haplotype analysis,” Hypertension, vol. 49, no. 1, article e2, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Zintzaras and J. Lau, “Synthesis of genetic association studies for pertinent gene-disease associations requires appropriate methodological and statistical approaches,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 634–645, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H.-C. Yang, Y.-J. Liang, Y.-L. Wu et al., “Genome-wide association study of young-onset hypertension in the Han Chinese population of Taiwan,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 5, article e5459, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. U. Kim, H. K. Chang, S. S. Lee et al., “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms in Behcet's disease and rheumatic diseases with vasculitis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1083–1087, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Awata, T. Neda, H. Iizuka et al., “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with diabetic macular edema in type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2184–2190, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Y. Shi and L. He, “SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci,” Cell Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 97–98, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Y. Lin, Y. Hu, and B. E. Huang, “Simple and efficient analysis of disease association with missing genotype data,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 444–452, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. D. Skol, L. J. Scott, G. R. Abecasis, and M. Boehnke, “Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies,” Nature Genetics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 209–213, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Vasilakou, V. Votteas, C. Kasparian et al., “Lack of association between endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and risk of premature coronary artery disease in the Greek population,” Acta Cardiologica, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 609–614, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Slatkin, “Linkage disequilibrium—understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 477–485, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Kumar, A. Nejatizadeh, E. Arif et al., “Multi-locus interactions of vascular homeostasis genes in essential hypertension: a gender-based study,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 405, no. 1-2, pp. 87–93, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. V. Vasconcellos, R. Lacchini, A. L. Jacob-Ferreira et al., “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase haplotypes associated with hypertension do not predispose to cardiac hypertrophy,” DNA and Cell Biology. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  21. V. C. Sandrim, E. B. Coelho, F. Nobre, G. M. Arado, V. L. Lanchote, and J. E. Tanus-Santos, “Susceptible and protective eNOS haplotypes in hypertensive black and white subjects,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 428–432, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. V. C. Sandrim, R. W. C. de Syllos, H. R. K. Lisboa, G. S. Tres, and J. E. Tanus-Santos, “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase haplotypes affect the susceptibility to hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 241–246, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Q. Zhao, S.-Y. Su, S.-F. Chen, B. Li, and D.-F. Gu, “Association study of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms with essential hypertension in northern Han Chinese,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 119, no. 13, pp. 1065–1071, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  24. V. C. Sandrim, J. C. Yugar-Toledo, Z. Desta, D. A. Flockhart, H. Moreno Jr., and J. E. Tanus-Santos, “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase haplotypes are related to blood pressure elevation, but not to resistance to antihypertensive drug therapy,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 2393–2397, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Conen, R. J. Glynn, J. E. Buring, P. M. Ridker, and R. Y. L. Zee, “Association of renin-angiotensin and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms with blood pressure progression and incident hypertension: prospective cohort study,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1780–1786, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X. L. Wang, A. S. Sim, R. F. Badenhop, R. M. Mccredie, and D. E. L. Wilcken, “A smoking-dependent risk of coronary artery disease associated with a polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene,” Nature Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. L. S. Rios, L. O. D'Onofrio, J. K. Souza et al., “Smoking-dependent and haplotype-specific effects of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms on angiographically assessed coronary artery disease in Caucasian- and African-Brazilians,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 135–141, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. R. Cardon and G. R. Abecasis, “Using haplotype blocks to map human complex trait loci,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 135–140, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. L. B. Jacob-Ferreira and V. C. Sandrim, “Endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphisms and hypertension: improved clinical evidence derived from haplotype analysis,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 1, p. 116, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. C. Sandrim, A. C. T. Palei, R. C. Cavalli et al., “eNOS haplotypes associated with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1467–1473, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. X. Zhu, L. Fejerman, A. Luke, A. Adeyemo, and R. S. Cooper, “Haplotypes produced from rare variants in the promoter and coding regions of angiotensinogen contribute to variation in angiotensinogen levels,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 639–643, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P.-Y. Liu, Y.-Y. Zhang, Y. Lu et al., “A survey of haplotype variants at several disease candidate genes: the importance of rare variants for complex diseases,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 221–227, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. B. Goldstein, “Common genetic variation and human traits,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 17, pp. 1696–1698, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. D. Kitsios and E. Zintzaras, “Genome-wide association studies: hypothesis-“free” or “engaged”?” Translational Research, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 161–164, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. “1000 Genomes Project,” 2009, View at: Google Scholar
  36. G. D. Kitsios and E. Zintzaras, “Genomic convergence of genome-wide investigations for complex traits,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 514–519, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. Zintzaras, G. Kitsios, D. Kent et al., “Genome-wide scans meta-analysis for pulse pressure,” Hypertension, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 557–564, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. G. Kitsios and E. Zintzaras, “Genetic variation associated with ischemic heart failure: a HuGE review and meta-analysis,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 619–633, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Misono, S. Maeda, M. Iemitsu et al., “Combination of polymorphisms in the β2-adrenergic receptor and nitric oxide synthase 3 genes increases the risk for hypertension,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1377–1383, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Georgios D. Kitsios and Elias Zintzaras. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.