Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Immunopathogenesis of Neglected Tropical Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5568077 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5568077

Maria Marta Figueiredo, Anna R. R. dos Santos, Lara C. Godoi, Natália S. de Castro, Bruno C. de Andrade, Sarah A. R. Sergio, Selma M. B. Jerônimo, Edward J. de Oliveira, Ruth T. Valencia-Portillo, Lucilândia M. Bezerra, Hiro Goto, Maria C. A. Sanchez, Caroline Junqueira, Santuza M. R. Teixeira, Flávio G. da Fonseca, Ricardo T. Gazzinelli, Ana Paula Fernandes, "Improved Performance of ELISA and Immunochromatographic Tests Using a New Chimeric A2-Based Protein for Human Visceral Leishmaniasis Diagnosis", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2021, Article ID 5568077, 15 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5568077

Improved Performance of ELISA and Immunochromatographic Tests Using a New Chimeric A2-Based Protein for Human Visceral Leishmaniasis Diagnosis

Academic Editor: Gabriela Santos-Gomes
Received12 Jan 2021
Revised22 Mar 2021
Accepted30 Mar 2021
Published29 Apr 2021

Abstract

Summary. Human visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a major public health problem worldwide, leading to significant mortality rates if not properly treated and controlled. Precise identification of infected patients is essential to establish treatment and control measures. Although several VL serological diagnosis advances have been accomplished lately, mainly using recombinant antigens and immunochromatographic tests (ICTs), improvements may still be achieved using multiepitope chimeric proteins in different test platforms. Here, we reported on the evaluation of ELISA and an ICT developed with a new chimeric protein, named DTL-4, based on repetitive antigenic sequences, including those present in the A2 protein. Methods. A total of 1028 sera samples were used for the development and validation of ELISA (321 samples from L. infantum-infected patients, 62 samples from VL/AIDS coinfected patients, 236 samples from patients infected with other diseases, and 409 samples from healthy donors). A total of 520 sera samples were used to develop and validate ICT (249 samples from L. infantum-infected patients, 46 samples from VL/AIDS coinfected patients, 40 samples from patients infected with other diseases, and 185 samples from healthy donors). Findings. Using the validation sera panels, DTL-4-based ELISA displayed an overall sensitivity of 94.61% (95% CI: 89.94-97.28), a specificity of 99.41% (95% CI: 96.39-99.99), and an accuracy of 97.02% (95% CI: 94.61-98.38), while for ICT, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values corresponded to 91.98% (95% CI: 86.65-95.39), 100.00% (95% CI: 96.30-100.00), and 95.14% (95% CI: 91.62-97.15), respectively. When testing sera samples from VL/AIDS coinfected patients, DTL-4-ELISA displayed a sensitivity of 77.42% (95% CI: 65.48-86.16), a specificity of 99.41% (95% CI: 96.39-99.99), and an accuracy of 93.51% (95% CI: 89.49%-96.10%), while for DTL-4-ICT, sensitivity was 73.91% (95% CI: 59.74-84.40), specificity was 90.63% (95% CI: 81.02-95.63), and accuracy was 82.00% (95% CI: 73.63-90.91). Conclusion. DTL-4 is a promising candidate antigen for serodiagnosis of VL patients, including those with VL/AIDS coinfection, when incorporated into ELISA or ICT test formats.

1. Introduction

Human visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is one of the world’s most neglected diseases, largely affecting low-socioeconomic-level individuals, mainly in developing countries [1, 2, 3]. When not treated, VL is fatal in 90%-100% of cases [4, 5]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, 50,000 to 90,000 new VL cases occur each year worldwide [6]. The zoonotic VL caused by Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum occurs in Mediterranean countries (North Africa and Europe); Southeast Europe; Middle East; Central Asia; and North, Central, and South America (Mexico, Venezuela, Brazil, and Bolivia) [7]. The zoonotic VL transmission areas have expanded lately due to the migration of people from rural to urban areas [8]. In 2018, more than 95% of new VL cases occurred in Brazil and nine countries of Asia and Africa [6], and 90% of VL cases in America occurred in Brazil [4].

Progress towards noninvasive, easy-to-perform, and highly accurate diagnosis of leishmaniasis depends on discovering suitable biomarkers and their use in sensitive, specific, and amenable diagnostic platforms to both laboratory and field conditions. Anti-Leishmania antibodies’ detection is an important diagnostic alternative and may be achieved using several different test platforms. The most used serological methods are enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunochromatographic tests [912]. Nevertheless, on serological assays, the diagnosis of cases with low or undetectable anti-Leishmania antibodies is a drawback and causes a drop in the test sensitivity. Another limitation of serological tests is cross-reactivity with other pathogens, which decreases the specificity. The low positive and negative predictive values resulting from these deficiencies generate uncertainties in the diagnostic accuracy [13].

To overcome the limitations in serological diagnosis, several groups have proposed the use of recombinant antigens comprising mapped and repetitive epitopes that can improve specificity and sensitivity of antibody detection [9, 11, 1418]. In agreement, incorporating the recombinant rK39 or K28 antigens on immunochromatography platforms for VL serological diagnosis (rapid tests) represented a significant improvement since besides being faster and easier to perform, rapid tests with recombinant antigens are more accurate compared with assays based on total antigens [19, 20].

The recombinant protein A2 has also emerged as a promising antigen for VL serodiagnosis, which could be, in part, attributed to the repetitive structure of B cell epitopes present in A2 [9, 2124]. Based on these previous studies, we designed a new chimeric protein containing part of the repetitive epitopes from A2 and other repetitive proteins expressed only by the visceralizing species of Leishmania, named DTL-4. Here, we report this chimeric recombinant antigen’s performance in ELISA and immunochromatographic tests, using samples of patients from Brazilian endemic areas presenting confirmed clinical and laboratory diagnosis of VL. The results show that DTL-4, regardless of the diagnostic platform used, is a reliable and efficient antigen capable of detecting human VL cases with improved accuracy.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

The performance of the DTL-4 chimeric protein was evaluated for the development of kits for serological diagnosis, ELISA, and immunochromatographic tests (ICTs). According to good clinical practice principles, the study was approved by local authorities and was carried out between 2016 and 2019.

2.2. Ethics Statement

This study complied with Ethical Principles in Human Research and resolutions CNS 466 of 12/12/2012 and CNS 441 of 05/12/2011 and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee/UFMG (CAAE: 67820516.8.1001.5149). The samples collected in Aracaju (Sergipe State), Bauru (São Paulo State), Campo Grande (Mato Grosso do Sul State), and Natal (Rio Grande do Norte State) are part of Research Protocol no. 490/11. The samples from Palmas (Tocantins State) and Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais State) were approved for this project (CAAE: 67820516.8.1001.5149). The samples from São Paulo (São Paulo State) are part of Protocol no. 529.638 of 01/22/2014. Samples from patients with HIV/Leishmania coinfection, collected in Campo Grande (Mato Grosso do Sul State) and Rio de Janeiro (Rio de Janeiro State), are part of Research Protocol no. 1021/09. Samples from patients with other infectious diseases are part of Research Protocol no. 339/08.

2.3. Patients and Healthy Donors

The healthy donors included in the study did not display any symptoms suggestive of leishmaniasis when the blood samples were collected. Also, they showed no suggestive signs of any other infectious disease. VL patients consisted of women and men over 18 years old. All L. infantum-infected patients presented clinical symptoms of VL. Controls with possible cross-reactivity consisted of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of other diseases (Figure 1). Patients coinfected with Leishmania/HIV were also studied. These samples were obtained at several centers and were characterized at each center using routine diagnostic methods.

Initially, to develop ELISA and ICT using DTL-4, sera samples (Figure 1) were obtained at the Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) in Palmas (Tocantins State), CPHL in Natal (Rio Grande do Norte State), and UFMG in Belo Horizonte (Center for Vaccine Technology (CT-Vacinas) from Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State) and Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State)). A total of 154 samples of patients with a confirmed VL diagnosis by either direct parasite microscopic or molecular detection, whose characteristics are described in the flowchart presented in Figure 1, were employed. Samples from patients from CPHL-Palmas were submitted to an indirect immunofluorescence (IFI) assay with Leishmania promastigotes, and samples from CPHL-Natal were assayed with both a house soluble leishmania promastigote antigen and rK39-based ELISA (Figure 1, panel 1.1). Negative sera samples from 240 healthy controls, with no symptoms of VL, also composed panel 1. To investigate cross-reactivity, 55 sera samples from subjects with a previously confirmed diagnosis of other parasitic diseases (toxoplasmosis, ; Chagas’ Disease, ; American tegumentary leishmaniasis, , and malaria, ) and rheumatoid factor () were used (Figure 1, panel 1.2).

All positive and negative samples were further tested by in-house ELISA with a total extract of L. infantum (ELISAEXT) performed at René Rachou Institute (FIOCRUZ, Minas Gerais), and with ELISA recombinant protein (rK39 Rekom Biotech®) provided by BioClin Quibasa Ltda. (Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais), and the commercial immunochromatographic test IT-LEISH® (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), performed at the CT-Vacinas.

After the establishment of the conditions for the best performance of DTL-4-ELISA and ICT, the tests were submitted to external validation at the Instituto de Medicina Tropical da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (IMT-FMUSP), São Paulo State, Brazil, with another sample panel (Figure 2, panel 2) with 569 samples. Panel 2.1 included sera from 167 L. infantum-infected patients from distinct localities in Brazil (Aracaju, Sergipe State; Piauí State; Bauru, São Paulo State; Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul State; and Natal, Rio Grande do Norte State), and sera of 169 healthy individuals, living in an endemic area and negative by DAT (Aracaju, Sergipe State; Bauru, São Paulo State; Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul State; Natal, Rio Grande do Norte State). The levels of DTL-4 antibodies were also assessed in a panel of sera from 62 patients previously diagnosed with VL/AIDS coinfection (Bauru, São Paulo State; Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul State; Natal, Rio Grande do Norte State; Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State; and São Paulo, São Paulo State). The L. infantum infection was diagnosed using the microscopic examination of the lymph node or bone marrow aspirate for Leishmania detection [25] and by direct agglutination test (DAT) [26]. The confirmation of HIV infection was made according to the Ministry of Health of Brazil [27].

To assess the interference of antibodies against other diseases with DTL-4-ELISA and ICT, 167 positive samples (Figure 2, panel 2.1) and 311 negative samples for VL (140 samples from panel 2.1 and 171 samples from panel 2.2—see Figure 2) were submitted to the interference test. Panel 2.2 was composed of seven positive samples for tegumentary leishmaniasis, 63 samples positive for Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi), 12 positive samples for malaria (Plasmodium vivax/Plasmodium falciparum), 20 samples positive for toxoplasmosis (Toxoplasma gondii), 10 samples positive for tuberculosis, 20 samples positive for syphilis, ten samples positive for lupus erythematosus, 20 samples positive for paracoccidioidomycosis, and nine samples with increased levels of rheumatoid factor.

2.4. Cloning, Expression, and Purification of Recombinant DTL-4 Protein

The DTL-4 gene synthesized and cloned into the E. coli expression vector pET24a was purchased from GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, EUA). E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed with pET24a/DTL-4 were grown at 37°C in 2 L of Luria-Bertani’s medium (LB) with 50 μg/mL kanamycin until the optical density of 600 nm reached 0.6 before adding isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). After 3 hours of incubation, the cells were harvested by centrifugation, and the bacterial cell pellet was resuspended in a solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 5 mM benzamidine, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and lysed in a homogenizer. Aliquots of total cell extracts were collected and analyzed by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% SDS-PAGE). The his-tagged protein was purified using the AKTA Prime Plus System (GE Healthcare). The suspension was loaded onto a Ni2+-charged chelating Sepharose HisTrap HP (GE Healthcare). Contaminants were washed away with a solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) and 100 mM NaCl. The recombinant protein was then eluted with a solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 100 mM NaCl, and increasing amounts of imidazole, starting from 0 to 500 mM. Purified protein samples were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. The protein was extensively dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 100 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol at 4°C and frozen. Further detailing of the protein and its amino acid sequence will not be revealed due to pending patent issues. Table 1 describes some characteristics of the recombinant DTL-4 protein.


ParametersResults
Number of amino acids403
Estimated molecular weight (kDa)40501.09
Theoretical isoelectric point4.85

The A2 recombinant protein (rA2) was produced as previously described [28]. The rK39 protein was purchased at Rekom Biotech® (Spain) and kindly provided by BioClin Quibasa Ltda. (Brazil).

2.5. DTL-4-ELISA

The presence of anti-DTL-4 IgG antibodies in plasma and serum was evaluated by the indirect ELISA method (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), using the purified recombinant DTL-4 antigen. ELISA plates (Costar®) were coated with 0.2 μg/well of recombinant protein diluted in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) (100 μL/well). The plates were incubated at 4°C for 18 hours and blocked with 1% BSA (280 μL/well) at 25°C for 2 hours. Plasma or serum samples were added to each well at a final dilution of 1 : 100. The antibody-antigen binding was detected by the addition of peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG FAPON® (1 : 100,000). The presence of bound IgG was detected using tetramethylbenzidine (MOSS), and the reaction stopped by the addition of 0.5 M H2SO4. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm using a Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The results were expressed as optical density (OD). The cut-off points were set at three standard deviations above the mean optical density read at 450 nm. were considered positive [9].

Initially, a titration was performed to determine the best amount of protein and serum dilution to be applied in individual serum evaluations by ELISA, using pools of samples with ten VL-positive sera and ten negative sera. We also compared the antibody levels against rA2, rK39, and rDTL-4 with the same sample pools, using in-house ELISA, since DTL-4 contains A2 epitopes, while rK39 is widely used as a recombinant antigen in several commercial tests. Next, we evaluated DTL-4-ELISA using 459 samples (positive and negatives samples from Figure 1, panel 1).

2.6. Repeatability, Reproducibility, Homogeneity, and Stability of DTL-4-ELISA

The DTL-4-ELISA intra-assay repeatability was determined using one positive and one negative sample in eight determinations to establish the coefficient of variation (% CV is equal to the standard deviation divided by the mean multiplied by 100) among measurements, within the same plate. A second test was performed to evaluate the test reproducibility, determining the interassay CV. To determine that, three samples were evaluated in three consecutive days, in eight measurements. A third test was carried out to evaluate the solid phase’s homogeneity, applying the same samples in different plate wells. A fourth test was carried out to assess the reagents’ stability in the solid phase, and each test solution, separately, at 37°C [29], to predict the shelf life of the kits stored under appropriate conditions. The cut-off was determined using one hundred samples from healthy donors from panel 1.1, and the cut-off points were defined as the mean plus three standard deviations.

2.7. Immunochromatographic Test (ICT)

A lateral flow-based doubled antigen immunochromatographic test (ICT) for antibody detection was assembled using the DTL-4 protein. The purified DTL-4 antigen was dispensed as the test line (T), and the Staphylococcus aureus protein A was dispensed as the control line (C), both in the detection zone of the nitrocellulose membrane. Protein A labeled with a signal generator colloidal gold was used to detect the samples’ antibodies as a control test line. For conjugation, either the DTL-4 protein or protein A were mixed with colloidal gold (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated at room temperature. To detect specific antibodies, we immobilized the DTL-4 protein onto the nitrocellulose membrane. The conjugate was adsorbed to the glass fiber and dried in a low humidity room. When in contact with sera, plasma, or peripheral blood containing anti-L. infantum antibodies, these first reacted with the colloidal gold conjugates on the conjugation pad. As the colloidal gold complex flows through the capture site, antibodies reacted with the antigens at the test line site, leading to the formation of a visible colored line. In the absence of specific antibodies (negative samples), no reactivity is observed at this site (Figure 3). The test was considered valid only if the control line could be clearly seen. Several tests were carried out to define the membranes’ best control and test lines’ location, type of plastic support, size of gold particles, sample volume, and buffer for lateral flow.

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the developed ICT test were evaluated against 520 samples, composed of 185 samples from healthy donors, from panels 1 and 2 (Figure 1 and 2) and 249 samples from L. infantum-infected patients from the Central Public Health Laboratory of Palmas (87 samples from panel 1.1—see Figure 1) and Instituto de Medicina Tropical of São Paulo (162 samples from panel 2.1—see Figure 2), and 46 samples from VL / AIDS coinfected patients (panel 2.1—see Figure 2). Cross-reactivity was evaluated with ten samples of each disease (Chagas disease, American tegumentary leishmaniasis, and malaria) and of rheumatoid factor (40 samples from panel 1.2—see Figure 1). The strip stability after the unpacking was assessed by holding the cassettes at room temperature for two hours and testing them with positive and negative samples. The accelerated aging stability was assessed, keeping the strips at 37°C for 7, 14, 21, and 28 days and testing them on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days before the test.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (version 7.0 for Windows). The lower limits of positivity (cut-off) for DTL-4-ELISA were established for optimal sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy using ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis. The D’Agostino-Pearson normality test, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test were used to determine whether a variable was normally distributed. The Mann–Whitney test and ANOVA were also used, and significant differences were considered when . The diagnostic capacity of DTL-4 was measured by assessing its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Kappa index was calculated according to Cohen [30] and interpreted according to Landis and Koch [31] to assess the agreement between ELISA and ICT with the serological reference methods: 1.00–0.81 = excellent; 0.80–0.61 = good; 0.60–0.41 = moderate; 0.40–0.21 = weak; and 0.20–0.00 = negligible agreement. McNemar’s test was used to estimate the statistical differences between ELISA and ICT. The significance of the difference between proportions was tested using the chi-square with Yate’s correction test. In all tests, a significance level of 0.05 was considered.

3. Results

3.1. High Levels of Expression and Purification of DTL-4 from Escherichia coli Soluble Fraction

The recombinant DTL-4 protein was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and purified from the soluble fraction on a Ni2+-charged Sepharose column using single-step chromatography. As shown in Figure 4, the protein migrated in SDS-PAGE as a single band with an apparent molecular weight of 40 kDa, as expected according to bioinformatic projections.

3.2. The DTL-4 Protein-Based ELISA Has High Accuracy for the Diagnosis of Human VL

The protein concentration to coat the ELISA plates was determined by a titration curve performed with pools containing ten positive and ten negative VL serum samples (Figure 5(a)). Moreover, since DTL-4 contains A2 epitopes and rK39 is the most widely used recombinant antigen for VL serodiagnosis, we have compared the antibody titers in the same sample pools against rA2, rK39, and DTL-4, using an ELISA made in-house. As shown in Figure 5(a), DTL-4 discriminates with high-precision positive and negative VL pools of sera, even when small amounts of protein were used to coat the ELISA plates. The DTL-4 concentration of 0.1 μg/mL (10 ng/well) was then selected to coat the ELISA plates for further analyses.

A serum titration curve was also performed with the same pools of sera (Figure 5(b)). As seen in Figure 5(b), positive sera’s reactivity with DTL-4 remains high, even at 1 : 1280 sera dilutions, while antibody titers against rA2 or rK39 dropped significantly after 1 : 80 or 1 : 320, respectively. The serum dilution of 1 : 100 was selected for the DTL-4-ELISA.

3.3. The DTL-4 Protein-Based ELISA Is Highly Sensitive for Serological Diagnosis of VL and Did Not Present Cross-Reactivity with Antibodies Present in Sera of Patients with Other Diseases

After determining the protein concentration and sera dilution to be used for best performance, DTL-4-ELISA was tested against 228 individual samples (128 positive and 100 negative) from sera panel 1.1 (Figure 1). In this assay, eleven samples out of the 128 positive ones did not react with DTL-4, corresponding to a sensitivity of 91.27% (95% CI: 84.92–95.56%), while eight samples among the negative ones reacted with DTL-4, leading to a specificity value of 92.00% (95% CI: 84.84%–96.48%) (Figure 6). This result indicated that DTL-4 efficiently discriminates negative and from positive samples (; Mann–Whitney test).

Because it has been described that sensitivity may vary depending on the test used for the previous diagnosis and origin of the samples assayed, we tested the DTL-4-ELISA considering these parameters. Accordingly, when using ELISA rK39 as reference (51 samples from the State of Rio Grande do Norte, an endemic area for VL), the sensitivity was 93.90%.When the reference diagnostic test was the IT-LEISH® rapid test (150 samples from the State of Tocantins, endemic for VL), the sensitivity was 90.00%. When using the reference ELISA with L. infantum total extract (272 samples from the State of Tocantins, endemic for VL), the sensitivity was 83.30% (Table 2).


DTL-4-ELISA
Sensitivity% ()Specificity% ()

rK39-ELISA93.90 (51)90.40 (100)
IT-LEISH® rapid test90.00 (150)94.00 (100)
L. infantum-ELISA83.30 (272)95.30 (100)

Several conditions may lead to antibodies that cross-react in serological tests for VL, including other parasitic infections, whose transmission areas overlap with VL areas in Brazil. Thus, we tested the DTL-4 protein-based ELISA for specificity using sera of patients diagnosed with inflammatory disorders (lupus and rheumatoid factor) and other infectious diseases. As shown in Figure 7, there is no significant reactivity of the DTL-4 protein-based DTL-4-ELISA with sera of the selected inflammatory diseases. No significant reactivity was also detected by testing sera of patients diagnosed with syphilis, tuberculosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, or other parasitic diseases, including tegumentary leishmaniasis, Chagas’ disease, malaria, and toxoplasmosis (panel 2.2, Figure 2), which are also highly prevalent in Brazil.

3.4. The DTL-4 Protein-Based ELISA Fulfills the Requirements for a Prototype of a Commercial Kit

To test the stability, repeatability, reproducibility, and homogeneity of DTL-4-ELISA, we used the biological samples from panel 1, described in Figure 1. After performing eight readings of two samples under the same conditions, they presented an average intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV %) of 3.8% and 4.6%, with the positive and negative samples, respectively. The test’s reproducibility, evaluated by assaying three samples (one positive and two negative) for three consecutive days, presented a CV% of 0.6% with the positive sample and 7.1% and 8.0% with the negative ones. ELISA stability was assessed by accelerated aging at 37°C for 28 days, which corresponds to stability for 18 months if maintained under refrigeration (4 to 8°C).

3.5. External Validation of the DTL-4-ELISA for the Diagnosis of Human Visceral Leishmaniasis

To further validate the sensitivity and specificity of the DTL-4-ELISA prototype, additional sera, including a very well-characterized sera panel (panel 2, Figure 2), were used, including the samples with previous results of DAT and parasitological tests and samples from different geographical localities in Brazil. As shown in Table 3, high overall values for sensitivity (94.61%; 95% CI:89.94%-97.38%), specificity (99.41%; 95% CI: 96.39%-99.99%), and accuracy (97.02%; 95% CI: 94.61%-98.38%) were obtained.


LocalitySensitivity% ()95% CISpecificity% ()95% CI

Aracaju, SE100.00 (9)65.54-100.0091.67 (12)62.47-100.00
Campo Grande, MS97.26 (73)89.98-99.82100.00 (121)96.30-100.00
Bauru, SP100.00 (12)71.80-100.00100.00 (7)59.56-100.00
Natal, RN93.75 (16)69.69-99.99100.00 (29)88.13-100.00
Piauí state89.47 (57)78.53-95.44
Total94.61 (167)89.94-97.2899.41 (169)96.39-99.99

SE: Sergipe state; MS: Mato Grosso do Sul state; SP: São Paulo state; RN: Rio Grande do Norte state; : number of samples; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

We also compared anti-DTL-4 IgG in sera from patients with VL with those from patients coinfected with VL/AIDS (samples from panel 2.1, Figure 2). The evaluation of IgG anti-DTL-4 showed that the median absorbance of sera of patients previously diagnosed with VL/AIDS coinfection () is lower than that of VL patients not coinfected () (Mann–Whitney test, ) (Figure 8). The sensitivity of DTL-4-ELISA in 62 VL+/AIDS+ patients was 77.42% (95% CI: 65.48%-86.16%), while in 167 patients with VL, as detected by the parasitological method, but without HIV (VL+/AIDS), the sensitivity was 94.61% (95% CI: 89.94%-97.28%) (Fisher’s exact test, ). Considering the results obtained in healthy donors, the accuracy of the DTL-4-ELISA in 62 VL+/AIDS+ patients was 93.51% (89.49%-96.10%).

We also evaluated the performance of the DTL-4-ELISA detection of VL in sera samples of VL and VL/AIDS patients from different localities in Brazil, according to the patients’ origin (Table 4). DTL-4-ELISA displayed high sensitivity to detect VL infection in patients either from Campo Grande (97.26%) or Bauru (100.00%) localities. Overall sensitivity corresponded to 97.65% (). The test was also able to discriminate a significant proportion of VL/AIDS coinfected patients, either from Campo Grande (81.82%) or Bauru (100.00%). Considering both localities, overall sensitivity among VL/AIDS coinfected patients was 83.33% (). However, it should be noted that the number of VL/AIDS coinfected patients’ sera from Bauru City was low, which may have impacted the sensitivity values observed.


LocationSubjectsDiagnostic accuracy (95% CI)
Sensitivity% ()
95% CI
Specificity% ()
95% CI
Accuracy%
95% CI

Campo Grande (Mato Grosso do Sul state)VL97.26 (73)
89.98-99.82
98.84
95.61-99.95
VL/AIDS81.82 (44)
67.78-90.75
94.44
89.26-97.32
Healthy100.00 (121)
96.30-100.00

Bauru (São Paulo state)VL100.00 (12)
71.80-100.00
100.00
80.21-100.00
VL/AIDS100.00 (04)
45.41-100.00
100.00
69.98-100.00
Healthy100.00 (07)
59.56-100.00

TotalVL97.65 (85)
91.32-99.86
99.06
96.42-99.97
VL/AIDS83.33 (48)
70.16-91.57
95.48
91.20-97.83
Healthy100.00 (128)
96.50-100.00

VL: visceral leishmaniasis; VL/AIDS: coinfection; healthy donors; : number of samples; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
3.6. Evaluation of the Performance of DTL-4 on Immunochromatographic Tests (ICT) for Human VL

Based on the performance of the DTL-4-ELISA developed, we tested the DTL-4 protein on an ICT test to detect antibodies in serum, peripheral blood, or plasma samples (Figures 9(a) and 9(c)). The ideal sample volume was 5 μL of serum or plasma and 10 μL of blood, both with reading times between 10 and 15 minutes. The ICT’s test stability was assessed by accelerated aging at 37°C for 28 days, corresponding to stability for 18 months, under adequate storage conditions.

As an initial evaluation, the ICT was tested against sera from panel 1 (Figure 1). The results were considered positive only if the test and control lines’ reactivities were observed and negative only if the control line’s reactivity was observed, indicating the absence of specific antibodies (Figure 9(a)). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values obtained with sera panel 1 were 91.95% (84.12 - 96.70), 97.65% (91.76 - 99.71), and 94.80% (95% CI: 90.21 - 99.65), respectively (Table 5).


VL () and healthy donors () (panel 1)

Assay typeELISA (+)ELISA (-)
ICT (+)8002
ICT (-)0783

(95% CI: 90.21–99.65%)

(95% CI: 84.12–96.70%)

(95% CI: 91.76–99.71%)

VL () and healthy donors () (panel 2)

Assay typeELISA (+)ELISA (-)
ICT (+)1454
ICT (-)9104
Total154108

(95% CI: 91.62–97.15%)

(95% CI: 86.65–95.39%)

(95% CI: 96.30–100.00%)

VL/AIDS+ () and healthy donors (4) (panel 2)

Assay typeELISA (+)ELISA (-)
ICT (+)346
ICT (-)1258
Total4664


(IC 95%: 75.52–89.48%)

(IC 95%: 59.74–84.40%)

(IC 95%: 81.02–95.63%)

ConcordanceKappa index- (95% CI)Value
ELISA versus ICT (VL)0.898 (0.844–0.952)0.2673
ELISA versus ICT (VL/AIDS+)0.657 (0.514–0.801)0.2386

VL: visceral leishmaniasis; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ICT: immunochromatographic test; All the 46 VL/AIDS+ samples were positive by VL-ELISA. McNemar test was used to estimate the statistical differences between ELISA and ICT. The differences were considered statistically significant when value .

Then, the ICT was tested against sera samples from validation panel 2 (Figure 2). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values obtained with this panel were 91.98 (95% CI: 86.65 - 95.39%), 100% (95% CI: 96.30 - 100.00), and 95.14% (95%CI: 91.62 - 97.15), respectively (Table 5).

The results of DTL-4-ICT were then compared with the results of DTL-4-ELISA. Among the 154 samples positive by ELISA (HVL), nine samples were negative by DTL-4-ICT, while all the 100 samples negative by DTL-4-ELISA were also negative by DTL-4-ICT. Thus, the tests presented excelent agreement, with . The McNemar test results indicated no statistically significant difference between the methods ().

On the other hand, when samples from coinfected VL/AIDS patients (all positive in VL-ELISA) were tested (), the sensitivity of DTL-4-ICT was lower (73.91%) as compared to DTL-4-ELISA 77.42%. A good concordance of was observed between ELISA and ICT sensitivity (Table 5).

The evaluation of the interference of antibodies against other diseases (Chagas’ disease, tegumentary leishmaniasis, malaria, and rheumatoid factor) that potentially would cross-react with DTL-4-ICT showed no cross-reactivity with antibodies raised against these other diseases (Figure 9). When sera samples of VL patients spiked with peripheral blood were tested (), the sensitivity determined for the ICT was 90% and the specificity was 100%. An illustration of the reactivity of a sera sample spiked with blood is seen in Figure 9(c).

4. Discussion

This study is aimed at evaluating a new chimeric recombinant protein, named DTL-4, as a potential antigen for accurate serological diagnosis of VL. DTL-4 contains epitopes from A2 and other proteins expressed by visceralizing species of Leishmania, which have been identified in previous immunoproteomic studies [21, 32, 33]. A2 has been consistently shown to discriminate symptomatic and asymptomatic VL individuals, either among human or dog populations [9, 16, 21, 34]. As shown for other antigens such as the Leishmania kinesins, the repetitive amino acid structure may amplify antibody detection, improving diagnosis sensitivity [22, 35]. On the other hand, the fact that A2 is present only in visceralizing Leishmania species also improves diagnosis specificity [23]. Besides its antigenic properties, DTL-4 is a recombinant antigen that is easily purified as a soluble protein and displays a low isoelectric point and significant amounts of positive and negative amino acids, which are highly desirable aspects for antibody reactivity and scaling up production, enabling cheaper and faster production in industrial settings and its further assembling of diagnostic tests in different formats.

By using well-characterized sera panels, the DTL-4-based ELISA specifically discriminated negative from positive samples in a ratio of 25 and displayed an improved performance (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 94.61%, 99.41%, and 97.02%, respectively), when compared to other commercial ELISA kits for VL serodiagnosis available in Brazil, as reported by Freire et al. [36]. DTL-4 also performed better than rK39-based ELISA [37] in samples from Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso states, with 90.67% accuracy ().

In general, ICT is a test format easier to perform than ELISA or other diagnosis platforms and can be applied individually, at the bedside, and in outpatient clinics. ICT has also been proven to be a versatile test format for use in field conditions. Although ICT is regarded as a more suitable format for serological screening, high sensitivity and specificity can be achievable and, in some cases, may replace more complex diagnostic tests. Boelaert et al. [38] claims that an ideal VL diagnostic test should perform with a and a . Compared with these parameters, the DTL-4 antigen displayed a more than satisfactory performance in both test formats, ELISA and ICT. It is noteworthy that a minimum accuracy of 90% is required for ICT tests to be selected for the Brazilian Government’s purchase through public calls to supply the public health system with commercial tests for VL diagnosis [39]. In 2019, Freire et al. [36] reported an accuracy of 96.2% (92.0–98.3) using IT-LEISH and 93.7% (88.8–96.6) with Kalazar Detect. Therefore, it may be considered that DTL-4-ICT displayed excellent performance, with an accuracy of 95.14%.

The majority of the ICTs available worldwide for active VL serodiagnosis, including the Kalazar Detect (InBios International, Seattle, WA) [23], IT-LEISH (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) [40], and Onsite Leishmania IgG/IgM Combo Rapid Test (CTK Biotech) [39] are based mainly on the same kinesin antigens also used in available ELISA. In a recent and comprehensive study, WHO reported that five different RDTs based on rK39 or rKE performed with high specificity (>95%) in all the different regions of the globe tested; however, sensitivity varied between tests (range, 36.8%-100%) and between regions. In ISC, all tests had a high sensitivity (>93%); in East Africa and Brazil, sensitivity results were variable, but no test exceeded 92% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.8-94.8%) [20].

The Brazilian Ministry of Health currently provides the OnSite Leishmania IgG/Igm Combo Rapid Test kit to diagnose suspected VL patients attending the public health system [41]. When evaluated in a panel of sera samples of VL cases from different Brazil regions, this test resulted in 92.1% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity, considering the IgG band. However, no VL case was positive on the IgM test, and one patient diagnosed with Mycobacterium infection was IgM positive [39], disclosing, therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of anti-Leishmania IgM antibodies for VL diagnosis. In 2019, Porcino et al. [42] also evaluated the ICT Kalazar Detect and Onsite Leishmania IgG/IgM Combo Rapid Test performance and obtained 76% and 64% sensitivities, respectively, in patients with active VL.

Differences were observed for the sensitivity of the DTL-4-based tests when sera samples from patients living in different regions in Brazil were assayed. This finding may be attributed to the small sample size of some subset panels used. However, this result corroborates previous reports showing variations in sensitivity and specificity when similar antigens are tested with sera panels from people living in different regions [20, 43, 44]. These discrepant patterns may be attributed to differences in Leishmania strains causing infection or other epidemiological factors not very well understood, such as heterogeneity of populations, MHC molecules, age, and nutritional status. Nonetheless, additional epitopes present in chimeric recombinant proteins, such as DTL-4, may improve serodiagnosis performance.

The interference analysis performed to evaluate potential cross-reactivity showed that DTL-4, regardless of ICT and ELISA tests, very well discriminated VL from other diseases, including Chagas’ disease, malaria, and tegumentary leishmaniasis, which are parasitic diseases also quite prevalent in different regions of Brazil. This finding indicated that DTL-4-ICT performed similarly to Kalazar Detect when tested with samples from the same diseases, as no cross-reactivity was observed in both studies [23]. Also, in samples from Chagas disease, DTL-4-ICT was comparable to IT-LEISH [45]. On the other hand, Pedras et al. [37] reported lower specificity with malaria (85.0%) and Chagas’ disease (83.3%) samples by using an rK39-based ELISA.

AIDS coinfection may impair the production of anti-Leishmania antibodies in patients with VL. Thus, a worrying aspect that still poses a significant challenge is the low sensitivity of serological tests in VL/AIDS coinfected patients [46]. In Brazil, the prevalence of VL/AIDS is 9% [47]. However, the percentage of coinfection is underestimated because it considers only patients with VL manifestations. Also, around 40% of VL patients are negative by HIV serology, and both Leishmania and HIV infection may be asymptomatic [47]. Patients with negative results should undergo further investigation, such as direct detection of parasites in bone marrow aspirates. However, a positive result combined with clinical signs has a significant diagnostic value [48].

In this study, DTL-4-ELISA presented an overall sensitivity of 77.42% and DTL-4-ICT presented an overall sensitivity of 73.91% for diagnosing VL patients with HIV. Although sensitivity was lower in the group of coinfected patients compared to that observed for the non-co-infected VL patients, it seems that DTL-4 may slightly improve VL serodiagnosis in this patient group, as compared to other tests, including the commercially available kits. Freire et al. [36] reported the sensitivity values of 65.8% for NovaLisa Leishmania infantum IgG (ELISA) in HIV-coinfected patients from Brazil. These authors also reported that low sensitivity values were obtained with IT-LEISH (63.2%) and Kalazar Detect (47.4%). One possible alternative to improve the DTL-4-based test performance, which was not thoroughly investigated in the present work, would be to set up different conditions for DTL-4-based tests for samples from patients suspected of HVL/AIDS coinfection. Alterations may include changes in protein amounts, sera dilutions, or sample volume, which may be more sensitive for detecting anti-DTL-4 antibodies in HIV-coinfected patients. Additional studies may be performed to evaluate the use of DTL-4-based tests in epidemiological surveys, detect asymptomatic infection, and monitor Leishmania transmission through blood transfusion or treatment response.

In summary, the prototyped DTL-4-based ELISA or ICT displayed high accuracy and excellent performance compared to some in house or commercially available Leishmania-derived recombinant antigen-based ELISA or ICT tests. Although there is still much space for additional technical and product improvements, the DTL-4-based tests described herein represent improved alternative options for precise VL serological diagnosis.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that this work has not been influenced by any financial, personal, or professional interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Maria Marta Figueiredo, Anna Raquel Ribeiro dos Santos, and Lara Carvalho Godoi performed the experiments and wrote the articles. Natália Salazar de Castro and Bruno Cassaro de Andrade expressed and purified the protein. Sarah Aparecida Rodrigues Sergio helped in the execution of the ELISA experiments. Selma Maria Bezerra Jerônimo, Edward José de Oliveira, and Lucilândia Maria Bezerra offered sera samples of visceral leishmaniasis and helped in scientific discussions. Maria Marta Figueiredo and Ruth Tamara Valencia-Portillo helped in the execution of the ELISA and ICT experiments for external validation. Hiro Goto and Maria Carmen Arroyo Sanchez performed external validation and revised the article. Caroline Furtado Junqueira, Santuza Maria Ribeiro Teixeira, Flávio Guimarães Da Fonseca, Ricardo Tostes Gazzinelli, and Ana Paula Fernandes delineated the experiments, analyzed and discussed data, and wrote and revised the article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to BioClin Quibasa Ltda. for providing the rK39 protein. This work was supported by the Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Vacinas (INCTv)/CNPq (grant nos. 573547/2008-4 and 465293/2014-0); Rede Mineira de Biomoléculas (FAPEMIG grant no. red001214); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG); and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

References

  1. J. Alvar, I. D. Vélez, C. Bern et al., “Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 5, article e35671, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. D. Mathers, M. Ezzati, and A. D. Lopez, “Measuring the burden of neglected tropical diseases: the global burden of disease framework,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 1, no. 2, article e114, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Alvar, S. Yactayo, and C. Bern, “Leishmaniasis and poverty,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 552–557, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, “Leishmaniose visceral: o que é, causas, sintomas, tratamento, diagnóstico e prevenção,” 2020, http://saude.gov.br/saude-de-a-z/leishmaniose-visceral. View at: Google Scholar
  5. WHO, Leishmaniasis, World Health Organization, 2020, https://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/visceral_leishmaniasis/en/.
  6. WHO, Leishmaniasis, World Health Organization, 2020, http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis.
  7. D. Steverding, “The history of leishmaniasis,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 82, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. Hiro and J. A. L. Lindoso, “Current diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis,” Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 419–433, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. R. R. dos Santos, Â. V. Serufo, M. M. Figueiredo et al., “Evaluation of three recombinant proteins for the development of ELISA and immunochromatographic tests for visceral leishmaniasis serodiagnosis,” Mem Inst Oswaldo CruzMemórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 114, article e180405, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Sakkas, C. Gartzonika, and S. Levidiotou, “Laboratory diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis,” Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 8–16, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  11. G. Srividya, A. Kulshrestha, R. Singh, and P. Salotra, “Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: developments over the last decade,” Parasitology Research, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 1065–1078, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. Srivastava, A. Dayama, S. Mehrotra, and S. Sundar, “Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis1,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 105, 6 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. F. Zanette, V. M. Lima, M. D. Laurenti et al., “Serological cross-reactivity of Trypanosoma cruzi, Ehrlichia canis, Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Babesia canis to Leishmania infantum chagasi tests in dogs,” Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 105–107, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Mukhtar, A. Abdoun, A. E. Ahmed et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of rK28-based immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests for visceral leishmaniasis: a prospective clinical cohort study in Sudan,” Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 594–600, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Pattabhi, J. Whittle, R. Mohamath et al., “Design, development and evaluation of rK28-based point-of-care tests for improving rapid diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 4, no. 9, article e822, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Porrozzi, M. V. S. Da Costa, A. Teva et al., “Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays based on crude and recombinant leishmanial antigens for serodiagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic Leishmania infantum visceral infections in dogs,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 544–548, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. M. Lemos, S. F. Guimarães Carvalho, R. Corey, and R. Dietze, “Avaliação do diagnóstico da leishmaniose visceral canina com a utilização de teste rápido com antígeno recombinante K39 em regiões,” Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  18. R. Badaró, D. Benson, M. C. Eulálio et al., “rK39: a cloned antigen of Leishmania chagasi that predicts active visceral leishmaniasis,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 758–761, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. Sarkari, R. E. Z. A. E. I. Zahra, and M. O. H. E. B. A. L. I. Mehdi, “Immunodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: current status and challenges: a review article,” Iranian journal of parasitology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 331–341, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. Cunningham, E. Hasker, P. Das et al., “A global comparative evaluation of commercial immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests for visceral leishmaniasis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1312–1319, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. M. Costa, H. M. Andrade, D. C. Bartholomeu et al., “Analysis of Leishmania chagasi by 2-D difference gel eletrophoresis (2-D DIGE) and immunoproteomic: identification of novel candidate antigens for diagnostic tests and vaccine,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2172–2184, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. M. Resende, B. C. Caetano, M. S. Dutra et al., “Epitope mapping and protective immunity elicited by adenovirus expressing the Leishmania amastigote specific A2 antigen: correlation with IFN-γ and cytolytic activity by CD8+ T cells,” Vaccine, vol. 26, no. 35, pp. 4585–4593, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. F. G. Carvalho, E. M. Lemos, R. Corey, and R. Dietze, “Performance of recombinant K39 antigen in the diagnosis of Brazilian visceral leishmaniasis,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 321–324, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E. Ghedin, W. W. Zhang, H. Charest, S. Sundar, R. T. Kenney, and G. Matlashewski, “Antibody response against a Leishmania donovani amastigote-stage-specific protein in patients with visceral leishmaniasis,” Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 530–535, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  25. Brasil Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica, Manual de Vigilância e Controle da Laishmaniose Visceral, Brasília, 2014.
  26. E. Harith, A. H. J. Kolk, P. A. Kager et al., “A simple and economical direct agglutination test for serodiagnosis and sero-epidemiological studies of visceral leishmaniasis,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 583–586, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Brasil Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de DST, Aids e Hepatites Virais, Manual Técnico para o Diagnóstico da Infecção pelo HIV, Brasilia., 2013.
  28. A. P. M. M. Almeida, L. F. M. Machado, D. Doro et al., “New vaccine formulations containing a modified version of the amastigote 2 antigen and the non-virulent Trypanosoma cruzi CL-14 strain are highly antigenic and protective against Leishmania infantum challenge,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, p. 465, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Matejtschuk and P. Phillips, “Product stability and accelerated degradation studies,” in Medicines from Animal Cell Culture, G. Stacey and J. Davis, Eds., 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Cohen, “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 1960. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data,” Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 159–174, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. T. Coelho, J. S. Oliveira, D. G. Valadares et al., “Identification of proteins in promastigote and amastigote-like Leishmania using an immunoproteomic approach,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 6, no. 1, p. e1430, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. S. Machado, F. F. Ramos, J. A. Oliveira-da-Silva et al., “An immunoproteomics approach to identify Leishmania infantum proteins to be applied for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection,” Parasitology, vol. 147, no. 9, pp. 932–939, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. Akhoundi, M. Mohebali, S. Shojaee et al., “Rapid detection of human and canine visceral leishmaniasis: assessment of a latex agglutination test based on the A2 antigen from amastigote forms of Leishmania infantum,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 307–313, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. Lage, F. Ludolf, P. Silveira et al., “Screening diagnostic candidates from Leishmania infantum proteins for human visceral leishmaniasis using an immunoproteomics approach,” Parasitology, vol. 146, no. 11, pp. 1467–1476, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. L. Freire, T. M. de Assis, E. Oliveira et al., “Performance of serological tests available in Brazil for the diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 13, no. 7, article e0007484, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. J. Pedras, V. L. de Gouvêa, E. J. de Oliveira, and A. Rabello, “Comparative evaluation of direct agglutination test, rK39 and soluble antigen ELISA and IFAT for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 172–178, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Boelaert, S. Bhattacharya, F. Chappuis et al., “Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests: visceral leishmaniasis,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 5, pp. S30–S39, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  39. M. L. Freire, T. S. M. Assis, D. M. Avelar, A. Rabello, and G. Cota, “Evaluation of a new brand of immunochromatographic test for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil made available from 2018,” Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, vol. 60, article e49, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  40. K. Ritmeijer, Y. Melaku, M. Mueller, S. Kipngetich, C. O'keeffe, and R. N. Davidson, “Evaluation of a new recombinant K39 rapid diagnostic test for Sudanese visceral leishmaniasis,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 76–80, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Brasil Ministério da Saúde, “Coordenação Geral de Laboratórios de Saúde Pública–CGLAB, Brasília DF. Nota Informativa N° 3/2018-CGLAB/DEVIT/SVS/MS,” 2018, 2020, https://www.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2018/fevereiro/26/NOTA-INFORMATIVA-n3.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  42. G. N. Porcino, K. S. S. Carvalho, D. C. Braz, V. Costa Silva, C. H. N. Costa, and I. K. F. de Miranda Santos, “Evaluation of methods for detection of asymptomatic individuals infected with Leishmania infantum in the state of Piauí, Brazil,” PLoS neglected tropical diseases, vol. 13, no. 7, p. e0007493, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. C. A. Sanchez, B. J. Celeste, J. A. L. Lindoso et al., “Performance of rK39-based immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic test for serodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis using whole blood, serum and oral fluid,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e0230610, 2020, [published correction appears in PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0232727]. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. E. K. Elmahallawy, A. Sampedro Martínez, J. Rodriguez-Granger et al., “Diagnosis of leishmaniasis,” Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 961–972, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. S. M. De Assis, A. S. C. Braga, M. J. Pedras et al., “Multi-centric prospective evaluation of rK39 rapid test and direct agglutination test for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 81–85, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. WHO, 2020c World Health Organization, Leishmaniasis. Leishmaniasis and HIV Coinfection, 2020, https://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/burden/hivcoinfection/burden_hiv_coinfection/en/.
  47. J. A. Lindoso, C. H. Moreira, M. A. Cunha, and I. T. Queiroz, “Visceral leishmaniasis and HIV coinfection: current perspectives,” HIV/AIDS-Research and Palliative Care, vol. 10, pp. 193–201, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. G. F. Cota, M. R. de Sousa, F. N. Demarqui, and A. Rabello, “The diagnostic accuracy of serologic and molecular methods for detecting visceral leishmaniasis in HIV infected patients: meta-analysis,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 6, no. 5, p. e1665, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Maria Marta Figueiredo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views743
Downloads471
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.