Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Functional Nanomaterials for Electronics, Optoelectronics, and Bioelectronics

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 538954 |

Woong-Ki Hong, SeungNam Cha, Jung Inn Sohn, Jong Min Kim, "Metal-Insulator Phase Transition in Quasi-One-Dimensional VO2 Structures", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 538954, 15 pages, 2015.

Metal-Insulator Phase Transition in Quasi-One-Dimensional VO2 Structures

Academic Editor: Chetna Dhand
Received15 Jan 2015
Accepted16 Mar 2015
Published09 Jul 2015


The metal-insulator transition (MIT) in strongly correlated oxides has attracted considerable attention from both theoretical and experimental researchers. Among the strongly correlated oxides, vanadium dioxide (VO2) has been extensively studied in the last decade because of a sharp, reversible change in its optical, electrical, and magnetic properties at approximately 341 K, which would be possible and promising to develop functional devices with advanced technology by utilizing MITs. However, taking the step towards successful commercialization requires the comprehensive understanding of MIT mechanisms, enabling us to manipulate the nature of transitions. In this regard, recently, quasi-one-dimensional (quasi-1D) VO2 structures have been intensively investigated due to their attractive geometry and unique physical properties to observe new aspects of transitions compared with their bulk counterparts. Thus, in this review, we will address recent research progress in the development of various approaches for the modification of MITs in quasi-1D VO2 structures. Furthermore, we will review recent studies on realizing novel functional devices based on quasi-1D VO2 structures for a wide range of applications, such as a gas sensor, a flexible strain sensor, an electrical switch, a thermal memory, and a nonvolatile electrical memory with multiple resistance.

1. Introduction

Strongly correlated oxide materials undergoing reversible transitions between metallic and insulating states have been gaining interest because of their unique physical properties coupled with various phase transitions as well as their potential for application in electronic devices, thermochromic devices, optical and holographic devices, sensors, actuators, and power meter or thermometer [122]. However, in spite of the attractive features of strongly correlated systems associated with metal-insulator transitions (MITs), it has been difficult to move forward towards commercially viable industrial applications. These problems have been mainly associated with the lack of not only comprehensive and fundamental understandings of underlying physics accounting for the precise transition mechanism but also appropriate materials and technology. Therefore, recent research has been focused on MITs in single-domain nanostructures due to their unique geometry and favorable domain size, providing a simple and homogeneous system to explore the intrinsic property of individual phases or single-domain phenomena, which are obscured in bulk samples.

Among the strongly correlated materials, vanadium dioxide (VO2) is the most interesting because of its first-order MIT near easily accessible temperature (approximately 341 K) that is accompanied by a structural phase transition (SPT) from a low-temperature monoclinic phase (M1, P21/c) to a high-temperature rutile phase (R, P42/mnm) [3, 4, 21]. Although there have been continued debates on whether the MIT in VO2 is usually driven by strong electron-electron correlations associated with the Mott transition or electron-phonon interactions associated with the Peierls transition, VO2 has attracted significant attention as a potential candidate for electronic and photonic devices based on MITs because of its tunable electrical and optical switching features at ultrafast time scale [123]. In particular, quasi-one-dimensional (quasi-1D) VO2 structures can provide new opportunities to explore, understand, and ultimately engineer MIT properties for developing novel functional devices as they exhibit significantly different properties compared with their bulk counterparts due to surface effects and unique dimensionality [3, 4, 21]. In addition, phase transitions in quasi-1D VO2 structures can be significantly affected and tuned by doping, interfacial stress, external stress, and stoichiometry and/or defects. Accordingly, considerable and extensive efforts have been recently devoted to the understanding of MIT behavior and fundamental mechanisms in quasi-1D VO2 structures and their practical applications, such as sensors, switching, and memory devices [2444]. In this review, therefore, we will first describe the basic crystal and electronic structures of VO2 related to metallic and insulating phases and the representative growth method of quasi-1D VO2 structures based on the vapor phase transport process. Then, we will review recent research carried out on the quasi-1D VO2 structures, particularly focusing on the development of various approaches for tunable MITs by doping, surface stress, external stress, and stoichiometry and/or defects. Lastly, we will discuss recent functional applications based on quasi-1D VO2 structures for gas and strain sensing, electrical switching, and thermal and nonvolatile electrical memory technologies.

2. Crystal and Molecular Orbital Structures of VO2

VO2 exhibits at least four different phases: the monoclinic M1, triclinic T, monoclinic M2, and rutile R phases. The electronic metal-insulator phase transition in VO2 is coupled with a SPT from a high-temperature metallic rutile (R) phase (P42/mnm space group) to a low-temperature insulating monoclinic (M1) phase (P21/c space group) at a temperature of approximately 341 K (Figure 1) [3, 4, 22, 23]. All V atoms are equally spaced along linear chains of VO6 octahedra parallel to the crystallographic -axis () with V–V distances of 2.86 Å in the R phase, as shown in Figure 1(a). During the MIT from a metallic R phase to an insulating M1 phase, two distinctive sets of V–V bond distances are observed at 2.65 and 3.12 Å for the monoclinic M1 phase due to the pairing and tilting of VO6 octahedra with respect to the rutile -axis, (Figure 1(a)) [22, 23]. Another monoclinic phase (M2, C2/m space group) has two types of V chains consisting of equal-spaced tilted V chains and paired V chains. Recently, M2 phases in VO2 micro/nanocrystals were reported to exist in the M1 and the R phase through stabilization by tensile stresses resulting from VO2 crystals bent or clamped to the substrate as well as stoichiometric defects due to the variation of lattice constants [38, 39, 4547]. The insulating character of the metastable M2 phase has been described as a Mott insulator driven by electron-electron correlation [3, 4, 21]. The T phase is a transitional phase between the M1 and M2 phases [3, 21, 39].

The SPT in VO2 is accompanied by a change of the electronic structures in the metallic and insulating states which was described in terms of molecular orbital theory [22, 23, 48, 49]. In the high-temperature metallic state (as shown schematically in the left side of Figure 1(b)), the density of states at is formed from a mixture of the half-filled band oriented along the and antibonding band. Across the MIT, the dimerization of the V ions along the and the tilting of the VO6 octahedra splits the bands that mediate V–V bonds into a bonding combination and an antibonding ( and ) combination. This results in the orbital polarization with the bonding band being fully occupied and the and being empty.

3. Growth of Quasi-1D VO2 Structures

In recent years, considerable efforts have been made to grow single-crystalline VO2 nanobeams or nanowires using a vapor phase transport method because of difficulties of growth associated with the presence of various competing vanadium oxide phases [2429]. It has been reported that the growth characteristics, morphology and composition features, and density of VO2 nanostructures are significantly affected by growth parameters such as temperature, gas flow rate, oxygen partial pressure, precursor deposition rate, and crystallographic plane of growth substrates [2429]. To explain this phenomenon, Kim et al. [24] reported that liquid droplets of V2O5 nucleate initially and then these droplets may become nucleation sites for the growth of VO2 nanowires. Strelcov et al. [25] conducted direct in situ optical and photoelectron emission microscopy observations of the nucleation and growth of VO2 nanostructures using thermal transport of V2O5 precursor in a vacuum or in an inert gas environment. They observed the coexistence and transformation of the intermediate oxide phases and morphologies during nanostructure reductive growth, as shown in Figure 2(a). In Figure 2(a), the temperature-composition phase diagram shows that vanadium oxides can have a variety of stoichiometries due to multiple oxidation states of vanadium in which the stoichiometries are mutually transformable at specific temperatures and oxygen partial pressures. Kim and Lauhon [26] also studied controlled morphology, density, and site-specificity of VO2 nanobeams using a two-step vapor transport method. As seen in Figure 2(b), they observed three distinctive morphologies of VO2 nanostructures, such as nanoparticles, nanowires, and nanosheets, depending on local source supersaturation and temperature. In addition, as shown in Figures 2(c)2(f), some previous studies have also shown that VO2 nanowires can form on various substrate surfaces and display either in-plane or out-of-plane growth, depending on the crystallographic orientation and lattice mismatch of growth substrates as well as the temperature of the reactor [2729].

4. Stimuli Effects on MITs in Quasi-1D VO2 Structures

4.1. Influence of Doping on MIT

The ability to incorporate transition metal ions into quasi-1D VO2 structures, which can play a key role in determining their MIT properties, is extremely important for a variety of applications such as optical switches, smart window coating, Mott transistors, memristors, sensors, and thermal actuators [3032, 4044]. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show that the doping of metal ions has a profound influence on the phase transition behavior and transition temperatures of VO2. It has been reported that the substitution of V4+ ions with metal-ion dopants of higher oxidation states, such as W6+, Nb5+, and Mo6+, lowers the transition temperature , which is identical to reduction of the V4+ ions. In contrast, metal-ion dopants of lower oxidation states, such as Cr3+, Al3+, Fe3+, and Ga3+, stabilize the M2 and T phases of VO2 at room temperature [30], which is identical to oxidation of the V4+ ions. A schematic diagram (Figure 3(a)) shows mutual transformations of VO2 phases as a function of reduction and oxidation induced by metal-ion dopants. Furthermore, Strelcov et al. [30] have recently demonstrated a practical synthesis procedure for stabilization of the M2 phase at ambient conditions via doping metal ions, which can open a way for realization of a purely electronic Mott transition field-effect transistor without an accompanying structural transition. As shown in Figure 3(b), the authors also produced high-quality uniformly doped single-crystalline structure and demonstrated a temperature-doping level phase diagram in the temperature range close to the ambient conditions by doping aluminum (Al) into VO2 nanostructures during the growth in which the doping level was varied from zero to . In addition, Lee et al. [31] also demonstrated the axially graded-tungsten- (W-) doped VO2 nanowires and measured resistance (R)-temperature (T) curves of the graded-W-doped and undoped VO2 nanowires, as shown in Figure 3(c). The undoped VO2 nanowire shows an abrupt resistance change at 67°C, whereas resistance of the graded-W-doped VO2 nanowire decreases gradually from room temperature to 60°C without the abrupt resistance change. As shown in Figure 3(d), with the increase in temperature, the metallic phase grows out of the two ends of the W-doped nanowire, followed by a progressive invasion into the insulating phase toward the middle of the W-doped nanowire, and the W-doped nanowire entirely turns into a single metallic phase at 55–60°C compared with the undoped VO2 nanowire.

Although the doping of metal ions into vanadium oxides is usually regarded as the effective way to control the electron concentration, this process is not reversible. Recently, Wei et al. [32] demonstrated that hydrogen doping into VO2 is completely reversible process and that the MIT in VO2 nanostructures can be strongly modified by doping with atomic hydrogen using the catalytic spillover method, which results in the electronic phase transition (i.e., the Mott transition). The authors also demonstrated that the MIT accompanied by a structural phase transition could be reversibly modified by hydrogen doping using a catalytic spillover method [32]. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show electrical resistivities and structural phases before and after the hydrogen doping of VO2 microcrystals. In Figure 4(a), the two-terminal device made from an as-grown VO2 microcrystal shows thermally activated conduction exhibiting an energy gap close to 0.6 eV (black curve). The two-terminal device that baked in flushing hydrogen gas at 150°C for 20 min shows an energy gap close to 0.2 eV (green curve). The energy gap of the device after further baking at 180°C for 20 min (red curve) is nearly zero. The device after annealing at 190°C for 20 min eventually stabilized in the metallic state with a characteristic negative slope (purple curve). The two-terminal device that was annealed in air at 250°C for 20 min recovered the original phase transition and temperature dependence (blue curve). As shown in the SEM images of Figure 4(b), the VO2 nanobeam becomes straight after hydrogen doping to the fully metallic state, indicating that the fully hydrogen-doped nanobeam has a shorter lattice constant than a monoclinic as-grown VO2 microcrystal. This is also well supported by the optical microscopy images of a VO2 microcrystal before and after hydrogen doping.

4.2. Influence of Surface Stress on MIT

The surface stress, affecting the lattice structure and relative stability of competing phases, plays an important role in determining the phase state of VO2 micro/nanostructures [3335, 50]. In particular, the surface stresses associated with the interaction between a nanobeam and a substrate for VO2 nanobeams with and without epitaxial interfaces significantly affect the MIT behavior in VO2 nanobeams, the spontaneous formation of metal-insulator domains, and the spatial phase transitions as well as the formation and stabilization of an M2 phase. For example, as shown in Figure 5(a), VO2 nanobeams lying on a SiO2 substrate (referred to as on-substrate VO2 nanobeams) without metal contacts exhibit the spontaneous formation of alternating metal-insulator domains along the nanobeam length, resulting from an adhesive interaction between the nanobeam and the substrate leading to a coherent uniaxial strain on the nanobeam [33]. Figure 5(b) shows that the electrical resistance of devices made from the on-substrate VO2 nanobeams changes in many discrete steps over a much wider temperature range during the heating and cooling cycles [33].

Sohn et al. [34] demonstrated how the epitaxial interface stress affects the phase transition behavior in VO2 nanobeams epitaxially grown on c-cut sapphire. Figure 6(a) shows the temperature-dependent evolution of X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra related to the (011)M1 and (020)M1 planes. Contour plots exhibit coexisting characteristics within the temperature region of 54–64°C and 68–80°C for corresponding (011)M1 and (020)M1 planes (marked by yellow dotted lines), respectively. In particular, in Figure 6(a), the peak corresponding to the plane of M2 is broader than that expected at low temperature and its peak position shifts slightly upward compared to the value of an M2 phase in VO2 nanobeams without the epitaxial interface. A SPT in the (011) plane occurs from 54°C, whereas a peak of the (020) plane splits into two peaks of (200)R and (002)M2 planes corresponding to the (020) plane of an M1 phase from 68°C, indicating the coexistence of M2 and R phases. Figure 6(b) shows temperature-dependent Raman and XRD spectra for VO2 nanobeams [35]. The temperature-dependent Raman spectra, which are obtained from the straight part (marked by A in the upper inset) and bent part (marked by B in the lower inset) of a bent VO2 nanobeam on a c-cut sapphire substrate, demonstrate the stress-induced structural transitions and the coexistence of three distinct M1, M2, and R phases. The evolution of Raman spectra of the straight region of a nanobeam (A) exhibits direct structural changes from M1 to M2 phases, whereas those of the bent part of a nanobeam (B) display coexistence of both M1 and M2 phases with increasing temperature and peaks associated with only M1 and M2 phases are observed even at room temperature. The XRD spectra from ensembles of epitaxially grown VO2 nanobeams were obtained at the temperature range of 6–303 K during the cooling process. At 303 K, peaks of (011)M1 and corresponding M2 planes coexist and the coexisting region exists down to 50 K through the direct transformation of the remaining M2 phase to an M1 phase.

4.3. Influence of External Stress on MIT

The control of the domain structure and phase transitions through external stress in VO2 could lead not only to deeply understanding the correlated electron materials but also to providing a novel way to control their electrical and optical properties for device applications. Recently, the phase transitions and domain dynamics between metallic and insulating phases in single-crystalline qausi-1D VO2 beams have been explored by introducing the external stress [3, 36, 37, 41, 42, 51]. For example, Cao et al. [36] demonstrated that periodic domains of metallic and insulating phases along single-crystal VO2 microbeams were nucleated and manipulated by tuning the strain over a wide range of values, as shown in Figure 7. Figure 7(a) shows the evolution of domains of triangular shape along a bent VO2 microbeam at different temperatures. The bent microbeam was in an insulating phase at room temperature and periodic triangular domains of the metallic phase started to nucleate at the inner edge of the bent region (compressive strain) at elevated temperatures. At a temperature near 341 K, the straight part of the microbeam transformed abruptly to the metallic phase, whereas the bent part of the microbeam showed a coexistence of domains of the metallic and insulating phases. The uniaxial stress (σ)-temperature (T) phase diagram in Figure 7(b) shows the fraction of the metallic and insulating phases as a function of temperature (-axis) and uniaxial stress (left -axis) or strain (right -axis). In the diagram, the VO2 phase is a pure metallic phase (metallic phase fraction ) at high temperatures and high compressive stresses and a pure insulating phase () at low temperatures and high tensile stresses. At intermediate temperatures and stresses, metallic and insulating phases coexisted. Figure 7(c) also shows how the metallic phase fraction (η) changed with external compressive stress along the length of a VO2 microbeam clamped onto a soft substrate. The uniaxial compression reversibly induces a phase transition between metal () and insulator () at room temperature in the clamped VO2 microbeams. The microbeam can be self-heated into the metallic phase when the applied bias voltage exceeded a threshold transition voltage and the operation power of the self-heated VO2 microbeam can be drastically reduced under the uniaxial compression at room temperature. Figure 7(d) shows the experimental observation of a MIT behavior induced by Joule heating under the external compression in the VO2 microbeam device.

To investigate the influence of external stress on crystallographic phase transition behavior in VO2 microcrystals, Atkin et al. [37] employed Raman spectroscopy, which is a facile, rapid, and nondestructive tool for studying the phase transition properties of individual nano/microstructures. The authors demonstrated that, with increasing tensile strain, an M1–T–M2 structural phase transition occurs at temperatures below approximately 305 K over a wide range of strain values in an individual, homogeneous VO2 microbeam subjected to external uniaxial strain, as shown in Figures 8(a) and 8(b). Figure 8(a) shows Raman spectra of a VO2 microcrystal showing the evolution in phonon modes with increasing tensile strain at room temperature. From these Raman spectra, a Raman frequency map is presented based on the spectral position of as a fingerprint for the three different phases (M1, T, and M2 phases) (Figure 8(b)).

4.4. Influence of Stoichiometry and/or Defects on MIT

The MIT properties of VO2 are significantly affected by stoichiometry and/or defects due to the fact that vanadium can exist in multiple valence states such as V3+, V4+, and V5+ [38, 39, 5255]. Recently, Zhang and coworkers [38] investigated the influence of stoichiometry on the structural phase transition in suspended single-crystalline VO2 nanobeams and established a pseudo-T-δ phase diagram with dimensions of temperature and stoichiometry, as shown in Figure 9(a). The authors also demonstrated that the annealing of nanobeams under vacuum conditions stabilized the rutile phase to temperatures as low as 103 K due to the fact that oxygen deficiency contributed to the enhancement of conductivity, providing direct evidence of substantial electron doping in VO2 nanobeams (Figure 9(b)). Most recently, Hong et al. [39] demonstrated a morphotropic phase transformation, which is the phase transition due to the compositional variation, in single-crystalline VO2 nanobeams caused by thermal reduction in a high-pressure hydrogen gas, leading to the stabilization of metallic phases. The authors showed that hydrogen significantly reduced oxygen in the nanobeams with characteristic nonlinear reduction kinetics which depend on the annealing time [39]. Figures 9(c) and 9(d) show that the work function and the electrical resistance of the reduced VO2 nanobeams follow a similar trend to the compositional variation due to the oxygen deficiency and related defects. These results imply that the structural properties and the electrical resistivity of VO2 nanobeams are closely correlated with the compositional stoichiometry and/or defects in the nanobeam.

5. Applications

VO2 has attracted considerable attention because of a variety of potential applications based on abrupt reversible phase transitions at ultrafast timescales in which the phase transition can be triggered by external perturbations, such as thermal, electrical, or optical perturbations as well as strain [1]. Recently, several efforts have been devoted to the demonstration of potential devices utilizing MITs in VO2 nanostructures, such as gas sensors, strain sensors, electrical switches, a thermal memory, and electrical memory devices [4044, 56, 57].

For example, Strelcov et al. [40] demonstrated a novel gas sensing concept based on suspended VO2 nanowires, as shown in Figure 10(a), in which the transition properties of nanowires strongly depend on the changes in molecular composition, pressure, and temperature of the ambient gas environment. Hu et al. [41] fabricated a flexible strain sensor and a single domain electrical switch based on a VO2 nanobeam. Figure 10(b) shows the change of the current (I)-voltage (V) behavior solely dependent on the loading strains (compressive and tensile strains) in which the different types of strain lead to the distinct response from the phase transition between M1 and M2 phases. Hu et al. [42] also showed that the self-heated VO2 nanobeam under the application of a bias voltage that exceeds a threshold transition voltage can be easily switched based on a single domain transition by stretching or compressing the substrate. Figure 10(c) shows a single domain switch based on phase transitions induced by the coupling of self-heating and external strain in a VO2 nanobeam.

In addition to the sensor and switching device applications, Xie et al. [43] demonstrated a solid-state thermal memory that can store and retain thermal information with high/low (HI/LO) temperature states, as shown in Figure 11(a). In Figure 11(a), HI/LO temperature states of repeated Write HI-Read-Write LO-Read cycles using heating and cooling pulses show the switching performance and repeatability of the thermal memory. Bae et al. [44] also reported a two-terminal memory device based on single VO2 nanowires that were synthesized by a hydrothermal method, followed by thermal annealing process to form a monoclinic phase (Figure 11(b)). As shown in Figure 11(b), the MIT induced by the Joule heating and the hysteresis behavior leads to the nonlinear R-V characteristic and eventually enables the switchable resistance to be maintained, resulting from the mixed states of metallic and insulating phases during the MIT of the single VO2 nanowire. The multiple retainable resistances of the single VO2 nanowire when two different voltage pulses are applied repeatedly show the possibility of nonvolatile memory device utilizing a MIT behavior.

6. Summary

In this review, we first present the basic crystal and molecular orbital structures of VO2 in metallic and insulating phases and then discuss the growth characteristics of single-crystalline quasi-1D VO2 structures in terms of their morphology, composition, and density, which can be significantly affected by growth conditions such as temperature, gas flow rate, oxygen partial pressure, precursor deposition rate, and crystallographic plane of growth substrates. Next, we discuss the influence of doping, surface stress, external stress, and stoichiometry and/or defects on various aspects of phase transitions in the quasi-1D VO2 structures. Lastly, we present snapshots of the research carried out emerging applications of quasi-1D VO2 structures such as a gas sensor, a flexible strain sensor, an electrical switch, a thermal memory, and a nonvolatile electrical memory. We expect that this review will give insights not only into understanding the basic important aspects of mechanism and properties of quasi-1D VO2 materials but also into developing practical applications for successful commercialization based on MIT technology.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Woong-Ki Hong acknowledges the financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013-R1A1A2009884 and NRF-2014M2B2A4030807). SeungNam Cha, Jung Inn Sohn, and Jong Min Kim acknowledge the support from the International Collaborative Energy Technology R&D Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea (no. 20128510010080).


  1. Z. Yang, C. Ko, and S. Ramanathan, “Oxide electronics utilizing ultrafast metal-insulator transitions,” Annual Review of Materials Research, vol. 41, pp. 337–367, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Jeong, N. Aetukuri, T. Graf, T. D. Schladt, M. G. Samant, and S. S. P. Parkin, “Suppression of metal-insulator transition in VO2 by electric field-induced oxygen vacancy formation,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6126, pp. 1402–1405, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. H. Park, J. M. Coy, T. S. Kasirga et al., “Measurement of a solid-state triple point at the metal-insulator transition in VO2,” Nature, vol. 500, no. 7463, pp. 431–434, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. S. Kasirga, D. Sun, J. H. Park et al., “Photoresponse of a strongly correlated material determined by scanning photocurrent microscopy,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 723–727, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, B.-G. Chae et al., “Mott transition in VO2 revealed by infrared spectroscopy and nano-imaging,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5857, pp. 1750–1753, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Kübler, H. Ehrke, R. Huber et al., “Coherent structural dynamics and electronic correlations during an ultrafast insulator-to-metal phase transition in VO2,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 11, Article ID 116401, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Appavoo and R. F. Haglund Jr., “Detecting nanoscale size dependence in VO2 phase transition using a split-ring resonator metamaterial,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1025–1031, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Lopez, L. A. Boatner, T. E. Haynes, R. F. Haglund Jr., and L. C. Feldman, “Switchable reflectivity on silicon from a composite VO2-SiO2 protecting layer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 1410–1412, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. A. Bugayev and M. C. Gupta, “Femtosecond holographic interferometry for studies of semiconductor ablation using vanadium dioxide film,” Optics Letters, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 1463–1465, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Cavalleri, C. Tóth, C. W. Siders et al., “Femtosecond structural dynamics in VO2 during an ultrafast solid-solid phase transition,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, Article ID 237401, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  11. D. Ruzmetov, G. Gopalakrishnan, J. Deng, V. Narayanamurti, and S. Ramanathan, “Electrical triggering of metal-insulator transition in nanoscale vanadium oxide junctions,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 106, no. 8, Article ID 083702, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Dicken, K. Aydin, I. M. Pryce et al., “Frequency tunable near-infrared metamaterials based on VO2 phase transition,” Optics Express, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 18330–18339, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Driscoll, H.-T. Kim, B.-G. Chae, M. Di Ventra, and D. N. Basov, “Phase-transition driven memristive system,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95, no. 4, Article ID 043503, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Ruzmetov, G. Gopalakrishnan, C. Ko, V. Narayanamurti, and S. Ramanathan, “Three-terminal field effect devices utilizing thin film vanadium oxide as the channel layer,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, no. 11, Article ID 114516, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Q. Gu, A. Falk, J. Q. Wu, L. Ouyang, and H. Park, “Current-driven phase oscillation and domain-wall propagation in Wxv1−xO2 nanobeams,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 363–366, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B.-J. Kim, Y. W. Lee, B.-G. Chae et al., “Temperature dependence of the first-order metal-insulator transition in VO2 and programmable critical temperature sensor,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 2, Article ID 023515, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. M. Briggs, I. M. Pryce, and H. A. Atwater, “Compact silicon photonic waveguide modulator based on the vanadium dioxide metal-insulator phase transition,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 11192–11201, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Cao, W. Fan, Q. Zhou et al., “Colossal thermal-mechanical actuation via phase transition in single-crystal VO2 microcantilevers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 108, no. 8, Article ID 083538, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Guo, M. I. Khan, C. Cheng et al., “VO2 nanowire-based microthermometer for quantitative evaluation of electron beam heating,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, pp. 1–5, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. Cheng, D. Fu, K. Liu et al., “Directly metering light absorption and heat transfer in single nanowires using metal-insulator transition in VO2,” Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 336–341, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. J. Chang, J. B. Park, G. Lee et al., “In situ probing of doping- and stress-mediated phase transitions in a single-crystalline VO2 nanobeam by spatially resolved Raman spectroscopy,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 14, pp. 8068–8074, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Whittaker, C. J. Patridge, and S. Banerjee, “Microscopic and nanoscale perspective of the metal-insulator phase transitions of VO2: some new twists to an old tale,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 745–758, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Wu, L. Fan, W. Huang et al., “Depressed transition temperature of WxV1−xO2: mechanistic insights from the X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 16, no. 33, pp. 17705–17714, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. H. Kim, B. Lee, S. Lee et al., “Growth of metal oxide nanowires from supercooled liquid nanodroplets,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 4138–4146, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. Strelcov, A. V. Davydov, U. Lanke, C. Watts, and A. Kolmakov, “In situ monitoring of the growth, intermediate phase transformations and templating of single crystal VO2 nanowires and nanoplatelets,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 3373–3384, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. I. S. Kim and L. J. Lauhon, “Increased yield and uniformity of vanadium dioxide nanobeam growth via two-step physical vapor transport process,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1383–1387, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. B. S. Guiton, Q. Gu, A. L. Prieto, M. S. Gudiksen, and H. Park, “Single-crystalline vanadium dioxide nanowires with rectangular cross sections,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 498–499, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Cheng, H. Guo, A. Amini et al., “Self-assembly and horizontal orientation growth of VO2 nanowires,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, pp. 1–5, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. I. Sohn, H. J. Joo, A. E. Porter et al., “Direct observation of the structural component of the metal-insulator phase transition and growth habits of epitaxially grown VO2 nanowires,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1570–1574, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. E. Strelcov, A. Tselev, I. Ivanov et al., “Doping-based stabilization of the M2 phase in free-standing VO2 nanostructures at room temperature,” Nano Letters, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 6198–6205, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Lee, C. Cheng, H. Guo et al., “Axially engineered metal-insulator phase transition by graded doping VO2 nanowires,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 12, pp. 4850–4855, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Wei, H. Ji, W. Guo, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and D. Natelson, “Hydrogen stabilization of metallic vanadium dioxide in single-crystal nanobeams,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 357–362, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Wu, Q. Gu, B. S. Guiton, N. P. de Leon, L. Ouyang, and H. Park, “Strain-induced self organization of metal-insulator domains in single-crystalline VO2 nanobeams,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 2313–2317, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. I. Sohn, H. J. Joo, D. Ahn et al., “Surface-stress-induced Mott transition and nature of associated spatial phase transition in single crystalline VO2 nanowires,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 3392–3397, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. I. Sohn, H. J. Joo, K. S. Kim et al., “Stress-induced domain dynamics and phase transitions in epitaxially grown VO2 nanowires,” Nanotechnology, vol. 23, no. 20, Article ID 205707, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Cao, E. Ertekin, V. Srinivasan et al., “Strain engineering and one-dimensional organization of metal–insulator domains in single-crystal vanadium dioxide beams,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 732–737, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. M. Atkin, S. Berweger, E. K. Chavez et al., “Strain and temperature dependence of the insulating phases of VO2 near the metal-insulator transition,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 85, no. 2, Article ID 020101, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Zhang, I. S. Kim, and L. J. Lauhon, “Stoichiometry engineering of monoclinic to rutile phase transition in suspended single crystalline vanadium dioxide nanobeams,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1443–1447, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. W.-K. Hong, J. B. Park, J. Yoon et al., “Hydrogen-induced morphotropic phase transformation of single-crystalline vanadium dioxide nanobeams,” Nano Letters, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1822–1828, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Strelcov, Y. Lilach, and A. Kolmakov, “Gas sensor based on metal-insulator transition in VO2 nanowire thermistor,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2322–2326, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. B. Hu, Y. Ding, W. Chen et al., “External-strain induced insulating phase transition in VO2 nanobeam and its application as flexible strain sensor,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 45, pp. 5134–5139, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Hu, Y. Zhang, W. Chen, C. Xu, and Z. L. Wang, “Self-heating and external strain coupling induced phase transition of VO2 nanobeam as single domain switch,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 31, pp. 3536–3541, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. R. Xie, C. T. Bui, B. Varghese et al., “An electrically tuned solid-state thermal memory based on metal-insulator transition of single-crystalline VO2 nanobeams,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1602–1607, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S.-H. Bae, S. Lee, H. Koo et al., “The memristive properties of a single VO2 nanowire with switching controlled by self-heating,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 36, pp. 5098–5103, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. Cao, Y. Gu, W. Fan et al., “Extended mapping and exploration of the vanadium dioxide stress-temperature phase diagram,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2667–2673, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Zhang, J. Y. Chou, and L. J. Lauhon, “Direct correlation of structural domain formation with the metal insulator transition in a VO2 nanobeam,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 4527–4532, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. C. Jones, S. Berweger, J. Wei, D. Cobden, and M. B. Raschke, “Nano-optical investigations of the metal-insulator phase behavior of individual VO2 microcrystals,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1574–1581, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. N. B. Aetukuri, A. X. Gray, M. Drouard et al., “Control of the metal-insulator transition in vanadium dioxide by modifying orbital occupancy,” Nature Physics, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 661–666, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Miller, M. Triplett, J. Lammatao et al., “Unusually long free carrier lifetime and metal-insulator band offset in vanadium dioxide,” Physical Review B, vol. 85, no. 8, Article ID 085111, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Cheng, T. Zhang, Y. Cai, K. M. Ho, K. K. Fung, and N. Wang, “Structure and metal-to-insulator transition of VO2 nanowires grown on sapphire substrates,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2010, no. 27, pp. 4332–4338, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. H. Guo, K. Wang, Y. Deng et al., “Nanomechanical actuation from phase transitions in individual VO2 micro-beams,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, no. 23, Article ID 231909, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. C. H. Griffiths and H. K. Eastwood, “Influence of stoichiometry on the metal-semiconductor transition in vanadium dioxide,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 2201–2206, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. C. Ko, Z. Yang, and S. Ramanathan, “Work function of vanadium dioxide thin films across the metal-insulator transition and the role of surface nonstoichiometry,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 3396–3401, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. E. Hryha, E. Rutqvist, and L. Nyborg, “Stoichiometric vanadium oxides studied by XPS,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1022–1025, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. C. Clavero, J. L. Slack, and A. Anders, “Size and composition-controlled fabrication of thermochromic metal oxide nanocrystals,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 46, no. 36, Article ID 362001, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. A. Simo, B. Mwakikunga, B. T. Sone, B. Julies, R. Madjoe, and M. Maaza, “VO2 nanostructures based chemiresistors for low power energy consumption hydrogen sensing,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 8147–8157, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. K. J. Choi and H. W. Jang, “One-dimensional oxide nanostructures as gas-sensing materials: review and issues,” Sensors, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 4083–4099, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Woong-Ki Hong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.