Chemical, Physical, and Biological Corneal Decellularization Methods: A Review of Literature

Procházková, Alexandra; Poláchová, Martina; Dítě, Jakub; Netuková, Magdaléna; Studený, Pavel

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1191462

Journal of Ophthalmology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Discussion Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 1191462 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1191462

Chemical, Physical, and Biological Corneal Decellularization Methods: A Review of Literature

Alexandra Procházková,¹Martina Poláchová,¹Jakub Dítě,¹Magdaléna Netuková,¹and Pavel Studený¹

Academic Editor: Carlo Cagini

Received16 Mar 2023

Revised28 Feb 2024

Accepted08 Mar 2024

Published25 Mar 2024

Abstract

The cornea is one of the most commonly transplanted tissues worldwide. It is used to restore vision when severe visual impairment or blindness occurs in patients with corneal diseases or after trauma. Due to the global shortage of healthy donor corneas, decellularized corneal tissue has significant potential as an alternative to corneal transplantation. It preserves the native and biological ultrastructure of the cornea and, therefore, represents the most promising scaffold. This article discusses different methods of corneal decellularization based on the current literature. We searched PubMed.gov for articles from January 2009 to December 2023 using the following keywords: corneal decellularization, decellularization methods, and corneal transplantation. Although several methods of decellularization of corneal tissue have been reported, a universal standardised protocol of corneal decellularization has not yet been introduced. In general, a combination of decellularization methods has been used for efficient decellularization while preserving the optimal properties of the corneal tissue.

1. Introduction

The cornea is a transparent avascular tissue and the main refractive structure of the eye. It enables good visual function with its spherical curvature and transparency, which is secured by highly organised structures and an inner monolayer composed of endothelial cells that control stromal hydration. When corneal transparency is significantly affected (because of a corneal disease or injury), the conservative approach of using topical eye drops is not sufficient; sometimes, the only option to restore visual function is corneal transplantation [1–3].

Corneal transplantation is considered the most frequent transplantation in the world, as corneal blindness is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Unfortunately, there is a global shortage of healthy transplantable human cadaveric donor corneas. A recent global survey quantified that there is only one healthy donor cornea available for the 70 required [4].

In terms of these numbers, it is necessary to develop new alternatives to donor corneas for transplantation. The most promising material appears to be the decellularized corneal tissue itself since it retains the original structure and composition of the native cornea [5, 6]. The decellularization would reduce the immune response and prevent transplant rejection as a cause of graft failure and, therefore, be excellent for corneal transplantation [5–7].

Since the removal of 100% of cell material is difficult to achieve using any widespread decellularization method without compromising the corneal tissue integrity, the minimal decellularization criteria for “sufficient decellularization” that should not lead to an adverse host immune response in vivo has been set as follows: (1) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content: decellularized extracellular matrix should contain less than 50 ng of double-stranded DNA per milligramme of dry weight, (2) the length of the DNA fragment should be less than 200 base pairs, and (3) histological staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) should show no visible nuclear component within stained tissue [8, 9].

Regarding corneal decellularization, other parameters should also be considered. Every decellularization method can cause an alteration of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the histoarchitecture of corneas [2, 8]. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been most commonly used to examine the detailed structure of decellularized corneal tissue and its cellular components. It could determine the efficiency of cell removal and preservation of stroma collagen structure. However, fixing protocols required for TEM can alter the collagen fibril structure [2, 9–12]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used for the evaluation of the anterior surface of the cornea. Compared to TEM, SEM can be used to visualize larger areas as it is not dependent on transmission, but the extensive dehydratation techniques being used to prepare samples for SEM are associated with a variable amount of shrinkage and can disrupt collagen fibril arrangement. Moreover, harsh fixatives may be required [2, 11, 13, 14]. Concerning evaluation of efficiency of decellularized corneal tissue, a combination of both, TEM and SEM, has been used successfully [9, 11, 13, 15].

Transparency of the cornea is crucial for visual function, and it is another parameter that needs to be examined. Some decellularization methods made the corneas so oedematous that the corneal clarity had to be restored by dehydration using glycerol [16–18]. Transparency can be examined macroscopically or evaluated by light transmittance ranging from 300 to 800 nm wavelengths using a spectrophotometer [13, 19]. Light transmittance can be influenced by corneal thickness that can change after decellularization. Corneal thickness can be measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) [2, 13]. The biomechanical properties of the decellularized corneal tissue vary depending on a particular decellularization method and its duration of exposure. They can be tested by performing a stretch-stress test using a testing device [8, 19].

Furthermore, it is important to involve in vivo studies (surgical application of corneal tissue) to determine the biocompatibility and efficiency of decellularized corneal tissue and to exclude a negative host immune response leading to functional failure with the need for a new transplant. With no reports of in vivo rejection, xenogeneic scaffolds could be used efficiently for corneal transplantation with the great advantage of their easy accessibility [5, 20–22]. Although sterilisation methods are not within the topic of the current article, it is necessary to mention that they can supplement corneal decellularization methods to ensure maximum effect without rejection after in vivo implantation [23–26].

Concerning new alternatives to donor corneas, several biomaterials have been investigated. There are two main approaches in corneal tissue engineering. The first is the scaffold-based approach that mostly focuses on the production of collagen-based hydrogels. Then, there are other natural polymers and sources that have been investigated (such as silk fibroin, fibrin, chitosan, gelatin, self-assembling peptides, and fish scale). The three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has been utilized to produce corneal scaffolds using decellularized ECM-based bioinks. Then, there is the second, cell-based approach that focuses on regeneration of the epithelium and endothelium [5, 14, 27–31]. While there were some promising results concerning biomaterials in the studies, there were difficulties in meeting the requirements to be used in clinical practice [9, 28]. Therefore, the use of decellularized corneal tissue as a scaffold should be further investigated as it retains the original structure and composition of the native cornea [5, 6].

In this article, we review different corneal tissue decellularization methods together with their advantages and limitations. The most frequent decellularization methods will be discussed and compared. Finally, we will also discuss possible challenges and future perspectives.

2. Methods

When composing this review, we searched PubMed.gov for articles from January 2009 to December 2023 that contained the following keywords: corneal decellularization, decellularization methods, and corneal transplantation. 96 articles were found. These articles were read together with their sources and sorted out. 93 articles were finally used to write this work.

The inclusion criteria to review our topic were a detailed description of different decellularization methods of animal and human corneal tissue followed by appropriate evaluation. In vitro and in vivo studies were included with no minimum number of samples set. Articles without a specific corneal decellularization procedure and its appropriate evaluation were excluded from the work (from results part), as well as articles describing the production of artificial tissues, containing a process of sterilisation, or using cell-based technologies. No article was excluded from work due to a language preference as all articles were available in English.

This article aimed to review different chemical, physical, and biological methods of corneal decellularization and to discuss the best possible method regarding its efficiency and effect on the cornea.

3. Results: Corneal Decellularization Methods

3.1. Chemical Decellularization Methods

Chemical decellularization methods include surfactants (chemical detergents), acids, bases, and chelating agents. The summary of chemical corneal decellularization methods discussed in this review will be further provided (Table 1).

3.1.1. Surfactants (Chemical Detergents)

Surfactants or chemical detergents lyse cells by disrupting their cellular membranes. They can be ionic with a positive or negative electrical charge, nonionic with no electrical charge, or zwitterionic with zero net charges [51].

(1) Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate. Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) is the most widely used ionic detergent because of its effective decellularization properties, with a significant rate of removal of cellular structures and genetic material. Different concentrations of SDS can be used for corneal decellularization, ranging from 0.1% to 2% SDS [18, 35, 51–53].

The use of 0.1% SDS was found to be the most efficient corneal decellularization protocol to decellularize porcine corneas when comparing four different decellularization protocols using benzalkonium chloride (BAK), Igepal, SDS, and Triton X-100. Three different concentrations of SDS, i.e., 0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1%, were used for 12, 24, and 48 hours [32, 52]. A significant reduction of cells and intact ECM was presented when the protocol of 0.3% SDS and 0.1% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) was used to decellularize porcine corneas [17, 18]. Successful porcine corneal decellularization was achieved by 0.5% SDS too [54]. A combination of 0.5% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, and nucleases (DNAse and RNAse) was also reported as an efficient method for decellularization of porcine corneas. This protocol was successful in removing DNA and maintaining ECM [2, 55]. Decellularization of bovine corneas using 1% SDS was sufficient and no cellular remains were present in decellularized tissue. However, the DNA concentration in the decellularized tissue was higher compared to samples decellularized by protocols using a solution of trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [12]. To produce an effective hybrid hydrogel for treating corneal wounds, porcine corneal stroma has been decellularized by using a combination of 1% SDS and 2% Triton X-100 with a sufficient decellularization as proven by quantification of DNA (19 ± 3 ng/mg) [14].

0.1% SDS was the most efficient in removing cellular structures and preserving ECM when decellularizing femtosecond-assisted human corneal stromal lenticules compared to other evaluated methods using the hyperosmotic solution, Triton X-100, and nucleases [33].

0.5% SDS kept mechanical strength of decellularized porcine cornea close to the native one [54]. Similarly, 1% SDS preserved mechanical strength of decellularized bovine corneas [12]. However, another study reported that 1% SDS caused changes in corneal mechanical strength, probably due to changes in the structure of the ECM [6].

The optical properties of the decellularized human corneal stromal lenticules with 0.1% SDS were similar to those of the untreated ones [56]. Corneal tissue was highly transparent when a combination of 0.5% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, and nucleases (DNAse and RNAse) was used for porcine corneal decellularization [2, 55]. Transparency of decellularized bovine corneas was lower when 1% SDS was used [12]. The protocol of using 0.3% SDS and 0.1% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) to decellularize porcine corneas decreased the transparency of the corneas due to swelling. This has been resolved by using 100% glycerol which can almost completely restore corneal transparency [17, 18].

The biocompatibility and safety of decellularized femtosecond-assisted human corneal stromal lenticules using 0.1% SDS were demonstrated by in vivo implanting in rabbit corneal stromal pockets [33]. This procedure could represent the potential for refractive and volume restoration of the cornea [38, 56]. Decellularized human corneal stromal tissue using 1% SDS was successfully implanted in human corneas in vivo to treat advanced keratoconus. The visual acuity of the recipients improved moderately, but with a statistically significant difference. During follow-ups, no clinical inflammation was observed and only a temporary mild lenticule haze was present [34, 57]. However, SDS can induce immunologic reaction, so it must be fully washed after the decellularization process [22].

(2) Sodium Deoxycholate. Sodium deoxycholate (SD) is also an ionic detergent used for decellularization. It is not as effective as SDS at the same concentration and incubation time; moreover, it is more disruptive to ECM structure [6].

0.5% and 1% SD could remove all cellular structures of the cornea at an incubation time of 48 hours, but it destroyed the tissue histoarchitecture, specifically collagen fibrils and Bowman’s and Descemet’s membrane. Decreasing the incubation time to 24 h or 36 h resulted in incomplete removal of the nuclei and structures of corneal cells [6]. The use of 0.5% SD with deoxyribonuclease (DNAse) did not result in a complete removal of cellular material from decellularized human cornea. However, higher concentration of SD resulted in efficient decellularization of human corneas within 24 hours (the use of 1% SD with DNAse). No epithelial and stromal cells were observed using H&E and DAPI staining [7].

(3) Triton X-100. Triton X-100 is nonionic chemical detergent used for corneal decellularization. It is less effective in removing cellular structures compared to ionic detergents, but it is also less disruptive. Not all studies documented Triton X-100 to be an efficient method for corneal decellularization [27, 33, 35]. Different concentration of Triton X-100 has been used for corneal decellularization. Whole porcine corneal decellularization protocols using Triton X-100 at three different concentrations (0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1%) and three different incubation times (12 h, 24 h, and 48 h) were insufficient [32]. An incomplete removal of cells was also reported when using Triton X-100 at a concentration of 0.1-1% to decellularize corneas [6, 35, 39].

Sufficient decellularization of porcine corneas was achieved using 1% Triton X-100 and lyophilization (freeze-drying process). The biocompatibility of the acellular matrix was proved after transplantation to the rabbit corneal stroma without an immune reaction after three months [40]. Efficient decellularization of porcine corneas was achieved by 0.2% Triton X-100 and hypertonic solution (NaCl) [43, 44]. A combination of Triton and NaCl has been even more efficient in decellularizing porcine corneas than the protocol using supercritical carbon dioxide (ScCO2) and NaCl (according to quantification of residual DNA). Moreover, elasticity and strength of Triton-treated corneal scaffold were higher than those treated with ScCO2 [44]. 2% Triton X-100 in combination with ammonium hydroxide or nucleases has also efficiently decellularized corneal tissue (confirmed by H&E and DAPI staining) [41, 42].

(4) 3-[(3-Chola-Midopropyl) Dimethylammonio]-1-Propanesulfonate (CHAPS). 3-[(3-chola-midopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) is a zwitterionic detergent that is not effective enough for corneal decellularization [6, 35]. 0.5% and 1% CHAPS for 24 hours did not present significant removal of cellular structures. Not even an increase in incubation time to 36 hours led to sufficient decellularization but also destroyed the histoarchitecture of corneal tissue [6]. CHAPS had the poorest decellularization effect on corneas compared to SDS and Triton X-100 with a significant number of nuclei remained [35]. These cellular structure remains could lead to an adverse immune response [58].

A combination of CHAPS, SDS, and a nuclease was used to prepare decellularized porcine corneal stroma to produce bioartificial corneas (BACs). A very low DNA content (28.5 ± 5.5 ng/mg) was present after decellularization considering this decellularization to be sufficient. Produced BACs resulted in good biocompatibility and tissue transparency [45]. Therefore, CHAPS can be considered a good complementary decellularization method, but when used alone, it is insufficient.

3.1.2. Acids and Bases

A few protocols for corneal decellularization using acids and bases have been reported [41, 42, 46].

(1) Acids. Acids are more commonly used for corneal decellularization than bases [5]. When comparing three different organic acids (formic acid, acetic acid, and citric acid) for porcine corneal decellularization, formic acid was found to be the optimal one, preserving tissue transparency and ECM structure and allowing recellularization potential. Histology analysis also confirmed good decellularization effect on porcine corneas using formic acid. However, acetic acid was unsatisfactory for corneal decellularization [46]. Similarly, the protocol using peracetic acid and ethanol (at different concentrations) to decellularize bovine corneas was unsatisfactory, as cell remains were present in the periphery of decellularized tissue [12].

(2) Bases. Only the use of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) has been documented in literature for corneal decellularization [5]. 0.1% ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) together with 2% Triton X-100 was used to decellularize the human corneal stroma. Complete decellularization was confirmed by H&E staining while preserving the structure of the ECM [41, 42].

3.1.3. Chelating Agent

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a chelating agent usually combined with another decellularization method (such as SDS and trypsin). When used alone, it is ineffective [8, 12, 48–50]. Protocol using a combination of 0.1% EDTA, 0.3% SDS, hypotonic tris buffer, and aprotinin was reported to decellularize porcine corneas. After decellularization, H&E and DAPI staining confirmed significant but incomplete cell removal from the stroma maintaining the ECM structure [17]. A very similar result was obtained after decellularization of bovine corneas using 0.1% EDTA, aprotinin, and 0.3% SDS [18].

A good decellularization effect to decellularize bovine corneas was achieved by a solution of trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (TE). There were no cell remains and the overall structure was maintained. Moreover, the transparency of the decellularized tissue was not affected [12]. The hypotonic solution of 0.5% TE was used to completely decellularize human corneal lenticules. DNA content met the requirements for sufficient corneal decellularization while maintaining ECM structure. This solution was more efficient than decellularization protocols using 0.5% SDS and 0.5% Triton X-100. Moreover, hypotonic TE-treated decellularized human corneal lenticules were sufficiently transparent and biocompatible [48].

3.2. Physical Decellularization Methods

Physical methods used for corneal decellularization are freeze-thaw cycles, hypotonic and hypertonic solutions, high hydrostatic pressure (HHP), ultra-high hydrostatic pressure (UHHP), and supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2). The summary of physical corneal decellularization methods discussed in this review will be further provided (Table 2).

3.2.1. Freeze-Thaw Cycles

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles (−80°C for freeze and 37°C for thaw) can be used for the decellularization process by lysing cells while keeping the structure of the extracellular matrix with only minimal disruptions and good optical properties. Usually, five to six freeze-thaw cycles have been used for corneal decellularization [8, 27]. Porcine corneas were decellularized by SDS, Triton X-100, and freeze-thaw cycles. All hydrogels produced from ECM of decellularized corneas were highly transparent, but those decellularized by freeze-thaw cycles were with the best transparency. Staining with H&E confirmed no cell nuclei present after decellularization [27, 51]. Porcine corneas were decellularized in combination with freeze-thaw cycles lysing cells and the nuclease destroying residual DNA. No nuclei were present after decellularization [59]. However, this decellularization method is ineffective in removing cells and genetic content on its own, so it is efficiently used in combination with other techniques (nucleases or chemical detergents) [8, 27, 59, 67].

3.2.2. Hypotonic and Hypertonic Solutions

Hypotonic and hypertonic solutions effectively lyse cells and help rinse cellular remains but not sufficiently enough. To achieve better decellularization outcomes, they can be used in combination with nucleases (such as DNAse and RNAse) which effectively remove nucleotides after cell lysis [8, 39].

Hypertonic solutions (mostly sodium chloride (NaCl) at a concentration of 1.5 M) have been successfully reported to remove cell material while maintaining ECM components [33, 60, 68]. A very good decellularization result was achieved when NaCl-prepared corneas were washed with 0.2% Triton X-100 [43, 44]. While using five different decellularization methods to decellularize human corneas, Triton X-100, poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG), and liquid nitrogen were not sufficient to remove all the cellular material. On the contrary, corneas treated with SDS or NaCl plus nucleases were efficiently decellularized and resulted in complete removal of the cellular material. However, only the 1.5 M NaCl plus nuclease protocol (DNAse and RNAse) left the epithelial basement membrane of the corneas completely intact and close to that of the untreated ones [39]. Due to the great result, the previously mentioned successful protocol was adopted for decellularization of human corneas. Complete corneal decellularization was achieved using NaCl plus nucleases. H&E and DAPI staining confirmed sufficient removal of cellular structures, while fibrillar structures remained unchanged [42]. NaCl with nucleases were also efficiently used to decellularize whole human corneas while preserving the structure of the ECM [36]. 1.5 M NaCl and DNase were efficiently used to decellularize small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticules as proven by histological staining and DNA quantification. However, some disruption in ECM structure could be noted [61]. Similarly, 1.5 M NaCl was successfully used to decellularize porcine corneas while corneal decellularization with 0.1% SDS was insufficient [60].

However, there were also studies reporting inefficient corneal decellularization by NaCl. According to these studies, NaCl was inefficient in removing cellular material and left the highest amount of residual DNA compared to other decellularization methods (SDS and Triton X-100) [37, 47].

3.2.3. High and Ultra-High Hydrostatic Pressure

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) used for decellularization has become increasingly widespread. This method uses pressure greater than 600 MPa to destroy cell membranes [20, 51]. HHP and ultra-high hydrostatic pressure (UHHP) were successfully used to decellularize porcine corneas with complete removal of cells while maintaining the ECM structure. In addition, produced scaffolds were proved to be noncytotoxic after transplantation into rabbit corneas [62, 63]. The great advantage of this method is the possibility of solitary application [51]. However, it has not been widely used due to the expensive equipment required [53, 58].

3.2.4. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) is being used as an alternative technique for decellularization. It bursts cells with high fluid pressure and effectively removes them from the tissue by rapid depressurisation. ScCO2 significantly reduces the decellularization time while maintaining the extracellular structure of corneas comparable to natives. It can be used simultaneously to sterilize tissue by obtaining immunocompatible acellular scaffolds. The limitation of this method is the complex scCO2 reactor system needed [44, 64, 65].

ScCO2 has been used to decellularize bovine corneas with an effective cell removal confirmed by H&E staining. The control group decellularized with 1% SDS was inferior to the scCO2 decellularization method in terms of ultrastructure maintenance [64]. Complete corneal decellularization was also reported after combining a 1-hour scCO2 decellularization method followed by a washing process. However, this combination resulted in an increased gap between collagen fibrils that changed a little of the stromal layer [65].

ScCO2 was also successfully used to produce acellular porcine corneas. A complete decellularization has been confirmed by histological staining and DNA quantification. Treated tissue was transplanted into rabbits with good biocompatibility [44, 66].

3.3. Biological Decellularization Methods

Biological methods of corneal decellularization include enzymes or serum. The summary of biological corneal decellularization methods discussed in this review will be further provided (Table 3).

3.3.1. Enzymes

Enzymes have been used efficiently for corneal decellularization. They help remove nucleotides after cell lysis, but they are unable to remove cellular remains on their own. Therefore, they must be used with another decellularization method [8, 13, 34, 42, 50].

Nucleases (DNAse and RNAse) are enzymes that have been efficiently used for corneal decellularization. They significantly reduced DNA material and also caused the treated tissue to be less transparent. A better decellularization result was achieved after pretreatment with a chemical agent or another enzyme [7, 37]. The human corneas unsuitable for keratoplasty were decellularized with a combination of 1% SDS and DNAse. This combination was effective in removing all cellular structures while preserving the alignment of collagen fibrils [47]. 1% SDS with DNAse was also efficient in decellularizing human corneas [7]. A combination of nucleases and chemical detergents (0.5% SDS and 1% Triton X-100) has successfully decellularized porcine corneas [2, 55]. Human corneas were efficiently decellularized using NaCl plus nucleases. All cellular structures were removed. Corneal decellularization using only NaCl was insufficient with cellular remains present in the stroma [36]. A combination of NaCl and DNAse was efficiently used to decellularize SMILE lenticules, as proven by histological staining and DNA quantification. However, some disruption in ECM structure could be noted [61]. Freeze-thaw cycles were used to decellularize porcine corneas followed by nuclease treatment to remove residual nuclei from corneal tissue. Nucleases are often used in decellularization protocol to remove residual genetic material [69, 72].

Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) is also an enzymatic agent used for corneal decellularization. PLA2 in combination with 0.5% SD was efficiently used for porcine corneal decellularization with sufficient removal of genetic material while preserving 80% glycosaminoglycan (GAG) compared to native porcine corneas. The scaffolds produced by this method remained with optical and mechanical properties and without significant change. Biocompatibility with no rejection was evaluated 12 months after animal transplantation (rabbit lamellar keratoplasty) [73].

Trypsin is an enzyme efficiently used for corneal decellularization in combination with EDTA. This solution resulted in sufficient decellularization of corneal tissue with the overall structure maintained, also with the good transparency and biocompatibility. The solution of 0.5% TE was even more efficient in corneal decellularization than protocol using 0.5% Triton X-100 [12, 48].

Supernuclease and mild detergent sodium N-lauroyl glutamate (SLG) has been efficiently used for rapid decellularization of porcine corneal stroma. Supernuclease is a homologous nuclease of benzonase not often used for corneal decellularization. However, decellularization by supernuclease and SLG has resulted in complete removal of nuclei as proven by DAPI staining. Efficiency of this decellularization method was also confirmed by DNA quantification. Moreover, decellularized corneas were almost transparent and the alignment of collagen fibrils was regular [13].

3.3.2. Serum

The use of serum can be another efficient corneal decellularization method. Bovine serum for 72 hours has been efficiently used to decellularize SMILE lenticules as proven by histological staining and DNA quantification. No alteration of the arrangement of the collagen fibrils or transparency has been present. Bovine serum for 72 hours was more effective in decellularization of SMILE lenticules than combination of NaCl and DNAse [61].

Human serum has been efficiently used with electrophoresis for corneal stromal tissue decellularization to obtain a good biocompatible scaffold. The decellularized corneal tissue obtained by this method showed optical, biomechanical, and ultrastructural similarities to those of native corneas. In vivo studies did not show rejection after lamellar keratoplasty (LKP). However, incubation with human serum itself would not have sufficiently removed the cellular structures, so electrophoresis had to be used [53, 71]. The advantage of this method is that no additional enzymes or harmful detergents are needed. Moreover, the good biocompatibility, no immunogenicity, and good transparency of transplanted corneas have been proved [70].

3.4. Efficiency and Overview of Corneal Decellularization Methods

Different chemical, physical, and biological decellularization methods have been reviewed. Evaluation of efficiency of each decellularization method (Tables 4–6) together with the summary (Figure 1) has been provided. Efficiency of corneal decellularization methods was evaluated according to criteria set for “sufficient decellularization” (mostly DNA quantification and histological analysis with H&E and DAPI staining) documented in available articles [8]. These articles were listed in the column named “References” (Tables 4–6). However, it was quite challenging as there are many decellularization methods and often their combination has been used with different concentrations and incubation times. For better visualization, an overview of corneal decellularization methods has been drawn (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Decellularized corneal tissue appears to be a promising scaffold for corneal transplantation, as sources of human donor corneas are limited. This is supported by the fact that the requirement for corneal transplantation is increasing.

Several successful techniques of xenogeneic corneal decellularization have already been described. Corneas of different species of animals (pig, cow, ostrich, rabbit, squid, dog, and cat) have been successfully used for corneal decellularization to construct the tissue-engineered corneal scaffolds [5, 12, 23, 24, 35, 54, 72, 74]. Porcine corneas have been the most commonly used for corneal decellularization mainly due to their ease of availability and multiple anatomical and physiological similarities with human corneas. All five layers of the cornea (epithelium, Bowman’s layer, stroma, Descemet’s membrane, and endothelium) are histologically visible in pigs. Porcine corneal endothelium is composed of a monolayer of endothelial hexagonal cells (just like human endothelium), ensuring good corneal transparency and vision [5, 31, 75, 76]. The histology of canine corneas has shown some similarities with humans; however, there are some key differences (for example, a layer comparable to Bowman’s layer in humans does not exist in dogs) [77]. Anatomical structure of the ostrich cornea (thickness of the central cornea, refractive power, and number of cell layers of central corneal epithelium) is closer to human cornea compared to porcine cornea [24]. Porcine corneas were found structurally closer to human corneas compared to rabbit corneas considering corneal interlamellar distance. Different studies have also had different sights regarding the presence and the absence of the Bowman’s membrane in rabbits [35, 76]. Furthermore, the immunogenicity of porcine corneal tissue is much lower than that of other species [6, 78]. The use of porcine corneas does not represent ethical issues as these are usually considered as waste in food industry. Therefore, they are also much more cost effective [21, 75, 78]. Considering all aspects and numerous studies, porcine corneas seem to be the most suitable substitute animal material for human corneas [14, 45]. This is supported by the fact that acellular porcine corneas (APCs) have been already successfully used in clinical research to treat patients with corneal diseases. Acellular porcine corneal stroma applied to patients was confirmed to be effective and safe [15, 79, 80]. However, decellularized human cadaveric corneas are an even better option compared to animal corneas as there is no risk of zoonotic disease [81]. A potential source for a partial corneal transplantation could be corneas with nonviable endothelium and the corneal remains of posterior LKP or femtosecond laser-assisted refractive lenticule extraction [33, 56, 57, 82]. Another potential source could be human lens capsules that were efficiently decellularized and used for endothelial tissue engineering [49].

The creation of an optimal corneal decellularization protocol could help solve the problem of human donor corneal shortage. It could also simplify the storage and extend the availability of corneal tissue in developing countries with limited access to eye banking. Efficiently decellularized corneal tissue could help treat corneal diseases (keratitis, ectasia, and perforations) or correct hyperopia and presbyopia [26, 34, 82]. The main challenge to corneal decellularization is to “sufficiently decellularize corneas” while maintaining their transparency, ECM structure, and biocompatibility [2, 8, 39, 58].

Today, corneas are mainly decellularized by chemical methods, with detergents being the most common one. They are very effective in removing cellular structures and genetic material [39, 53, 72]. Therefore, they are also often used in decellularization of other tissues. Rat aorta was efficiently decellularized by 0.5% SDS. Even more efficient was a combination of 0.25% SDS and 0.5% Triton X-100. Bovine lungs were efficiently decellularized by 1% SDS and DNAse. Combination of 1% Triton X-100 for 72 hours and DNAse for 1 hour was also effective in decellularization of bovine lungs, but protocol with SDS was more efficient [83, 84]. Hypotonic and hypertonic solutions have been effectively used for corneal decellularization in combination with other decellularization methods [39, 43, 44]. The same applies to freeze-thaw cycles and enzymes that have often been used for efficient corneal decellularization but in combination with other methods [2, 36, 37, 53]. The advantage of the aforementioned methods is low cost and easy accessibility. The disadvantages are possible changes in ECM structure and decreased transparency of corneal tissue due to swelling. Therefore, a combination of decellularization methods has been used mainly to achieve “sufficient decellularization” with less damage to the cornea. Strong and weak decellularization methods could complement each other [20, 51, 53, 55]. Human serum in conjunction with electrophoresis has been also reported to be an efficient decellularization method with no need for additional enzymes or chemical detergents to ensure biocompatibility and maintain transparency [70, 71]. High or ultra-high hydrostatic pressure can decellularize the corneas on their own. Their other advantage, together with supercritical carbon dioxide, is a short treatment time. The negative is the expensive equipment needed [20, 46, 51, 53, 85].

The progress in the field represents production of hydrogels and biomaterials produced by cell-based technologies and 3D bioprinting. However, their limitation represents clinical application [14, 19, 27, 29, 51]. Some acellular corneas have entered clinical research as a potential alternative for human donor corneas for treatment of corneal diseases. Acellular porcine corneal stroma (APCS) has been used in clinical studies to treat patients with various types of corneal infections. A combination of physical (NaCl) and chemical (0.2% Triton X-100) decellularization methods together with sterilization (Co⁶⁰ radiation) has been used to produce safe and effective APCSs for human keratoplasty [79, 86]. Acellular porcine corneal lenticules (Xenia implants) have been efficiently used in patients for treatment of advanced keratoconus and ectasia. A retrospective clinical study documented their safety and effectiveness. After extraction from porcine tissues, lenticules were decellularized, cross-linked, and sterilized before further use [80, 87]. Gamma-irradiated sterile corneal tissues (VisionGraft™) have been efficiently used for corneal and glaucoma patch surgeries when viable endothelium was not needed. Corneal tissue underwent irradiation dose from 17 to 23 kGy according to a patented technology to produce a sterile acellular corneal tissue [88, 89]. The other clinical studies documented safety and efficacy of corneal stromal lenticules (CSLs) obtained by SMILE refractive surgery for the treatment of corneal ulcers and perforations. These acellular corneal tissues were cryopreserved at −80°C from 2 to 6 months before transplantation [90–92]. Decellularized corneal stromal laminas obtained from human donor corneas with nonviable endothelium were used in a clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficiency in patients with advanced keratoconus. Corneal stromal laminas were decellularized by a combination of decellularization methods (1% SDS and DNAse). Their implantation in vivo was documented to be safe and moderately effective for the treatment of advanced keratoconus compared to classical corneal transplantation techniques [34, 93]. At the moment, there are probably other ongoing clinical trials concerning acellular corneas with no data published yet. With further research, there is a great probability of creating the best possible alternative to human donor corneas to help resolve their shortage and treat corneal diseases.

5. Conclusion

Chemical, physical, and biological corneal decellularization methods were compared according to the recent available literature. In last few years, there has been a great progress in developing decellularized biomaterials for the treatment of corneal diseases. Most promising are xenotransplants and hydrogels, where a combination of decellularization methods has been used. Among decellularization methods, mostly chemical detergents have been used for their high efficiency and easy availability. The biomaterials produced by cell-based technologies and 3D bioprinting also attract great attention. These methods represent new promising approaches in production of corneal tissue replacements. Despite the great progress in producing corneal tissue transplant, there are still challenges that need to be resolved including clinical application and potential development of full thickness donor cornea for the treatment of corneal diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express special thanks to the Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and project TACR TO01000099 (the establishment of advanced cell therapy for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency in the Czech Republic) that has provided financial support for this project.

References

W. J. Armitage, “Preservation of human cornea,” Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy: Offizielles Organ Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Fur Transfusionsmedizin Und Immunhamatologie, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 143–147, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ahearne, “Corneal extracellular matrix decellularization,” Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 157, no. 2020, pp. 81–95, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shi, T. Bikkuzin, Z. Song et al., “Comprehensive evaluation of decellularized porcine corneal after clinical transplantation,” Xenotransplantation, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gain, R. Jullienne, Z. He et al., “Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking,” JAMA ophthalmology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 167–173, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernández-Pérez and M. Ahearne, “Decellularization and recellularization of cornea: progress towards a donor alternative,” Methods (San Diego, Calif), vol. 171, no. Jan. 2020, pp. 86–96, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Du, X. Wu, K. Pang, and Y. Yang, “Histological evaluation and biomechanical characterisation of an acellular porcine cornea scaffold,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 410–414, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Polisetti, A. Schmid, U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt et al., “A decellularized human corneal scaffold for anterior corneal surface reconstruction,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2992, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Crapo, T. W. Gilbert, and S. F. Badylak, “An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3233–3243, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Neishabouri, A. Soltani Khaboushan, F. Daghigh, A.-M. Kajbafzadeh, and M. Majidi Zolbin, “Decellularization in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: evaluation, modification, and application methods,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 2022, Article ID 805299, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Lynch, S. L. Wilson, and M. Ahearne, “Dextran preserves native corneal structure during decellularization,” Tissue Engineering Part C Methods, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 561–572, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Wilson, L. E. Sidney, S. E. Dunphy, J. B. Rose, and A. Hopkinson, “Keeping an eye on decellularized corneas: a review of methods, characterization and applications,” Journal of Functional Biomaterials, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 114–161, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ponce Márquez, V. S. Martínez, W. McIntosh Ambrose et al., “Decellularization of bovine corneas for tissue engineering applications,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1839–1847, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dong, L. Zhao, F. Wang et al., “Rapid porcine corneal decellularization through the use of sodium N-lauroyl glutamate and supernuclease,” Journal of Tissue Engineering, vol. 10, Article ID 204173141987587, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Shen, S. Li, X. Zhao et al., “Dual-crosslinked regenerative hydrogel for sutureless long-term repair of corneal defect,” Bioactive Materials, vol. 20, no. Feb. 2023, pp. 434–448, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, Z. Hu, J. Qu et al., “Tissue-engineered corneal endothelial sheets using ultrathin acellular porcine corneal stroma substrates for endothelial keratoplasty,” ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1301–1311, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Lee, Y. Miyagawa, C. Long, D. K. C. Cooper, and H. Hara, “A comparison of three methods of decellularization of pig corneas to reduce immunogenicity,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 587–593, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Yoeruek, T. Bayyoud, C. Maurus et al., “Decellularization of porcine corneas and repopulation with human corneal cells for tissue-engineered xenografts,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. e125–e131, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Bayyoud, S. Thaler, J. Hofmann et al., “Decellularized bovine corneal posterior lamellae as carrier matrix for cultivated human corneal endothelial cells,” Current Eye Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 179–186, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mertsch, M. Hasenzahl, S. Reichl, G. Geerling, and S. Schrader, “Decellularized human corneal stromal cell sheet as a novel matrix for ocular surface reconstruction,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1318–1332, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gilpin and Y. Yang, “Decellularization strategies for regenerative medicine: from processing techniques to applications,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 9831534, 13 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Yoon, H. J. Choi, and M. K. Kim, “Corneal xenotransplantation: where are we standing?” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 80, Article ID 100876, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kang, Y. Han, M. Jin et al., “Decellularized squid mantle scaffolds as tissue-engineered corneal stroma for promoting corneal regeneration,” Bioengineering and translational medicine, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e10531, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Li, X. Wang, P. Wan et al., “Tectonic lamellar keratoplasty with acellular corneal stroma in high-risk corneal transplantation,” Molecular Vision, vol. 17, pp. 1909–1917, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
X.-N. Liu, X.-P. Zhu, J. Wu et al., “Acellular ostrich corneal stroma used as scaffold for construction of tissue-engineered cornea,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 325–331, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Islam, R. Sharifi, S. Mamodaly et al., “Effects of gamma radiation sterilization on the structural and biological properties of decellularized corneal xenografts,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 96, pp. 330–344, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lin, Q. Zheng, S. Hua, Y. Meng, W. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Cross-linked decellularized porcine corneal graft for treating fungal keratitis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 9955, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernández-Pérez and M. Ahearne, “The impact of decellularization methods on extracellular matrix derived hydrogels,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID 14933, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhou, V. H. Guaiquil, M. Wong et al., “Hydrogels derived from acellular porcine corneal stroma enhance corneal wound healing,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 134, pp. 177–189, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Matthyssen, B. Van den Bogerd, S. N. Dhubhghaill, C. Koppen, and N. Zakaria, “Corneal regeneration: a review of stromal replacements,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 69, pp. 31–41, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhe, X. Wu, P. Yu et al., “Recent advances in decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 3197, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-Y. Li, H.-A. Pan, K.-H. Chen et al., “Fish-scale collagen membrane seeded with corneal endothelial cells as alternative graft for endothelial keratoplasty transplantation,” ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 2570–2577, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. González-Andrades, V. Carriel, M. Rivera-Izquierdo et al., “Effects of detergent-based protocols on decellularization of corneas with sclerocorneal limbus. Evaluation of regional differences,” Translational Vision Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 13, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H.-F. Yam, N. Z. B. M. Yusoff, T.-W. Goh et al., “Decellularization of human stromal refractive lenticules for corneal tissue engineering,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID 26339, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Alió Del Barrio, M. El Zarif, A. Azaar et al., “Corneal stroma enhancement with decellularized stromal laminas with or without stem cell recellularization for advanced keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 186, pp. 47–58, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Marin-Tapia, L. Romero-Salazar, J. C. Arteaga-Arcos, R. Rosales-Ibáñez, and M. Mayorga-Rojas, “Micro-mechanical properties of corneal scaffolds from two different bio-models obtained by an efficient chemical decellularization,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 119, Article ID 104510, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. da Mata Martins, P. da Silva Cunha, M. A. Rodrigues et al., “Epithelial basement membrane of human decellularized cornea as a suitable substrate for differentiation of embryonic stem cells into corneal epithelial-like cells,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 116, Article ID 111215, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Wilson, L. E. Sidney, S. E. Dunphy, H. S. Dua, and A. Hopkinson, “Corneal decellularization: a method of recycling unsuitable donor tissue for clinical translation?” Current Eye Research, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 769–782, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H.-F. Yam, F. Bandeira, Y.-C. Liu et al., “Effect of corneal stromal lenticule customization on neurite distribution and excitatory property,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 38, pp. 275–284, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Shafiq, R. A. Gemeinhart, B. Y. J. T. Yue, and A. R. Djalilian, “Decellularized human cornea for reconstructing the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma,” Tissue Engineering Part C Methods, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 340–348, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Fu, X. Fan, P. Chen, C. Shao, and W. Lu, “Reconstruction of a tissue-engineered cornea with porcine corneal acellular matrix as the scaffold,” Cells Tissues Organs, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 193–202, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Choi, J. K. Williams, M. Greven et al., “Bioengineering endothelialized neo-corneas using donor-derived corneal endothelial cells and decellularized corneal stroma,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 26, pp. 6738–6745, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, G. Niu, J. S. Choi, M. Giegengack, A. Atala, and S. Soker, “Bioengineered multilayered human corneas from discarded human corneal tissue,” Biomedical Materials (Bristol, England), vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID 035012, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Luo, Y. Lu, T. Wu, M. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Jin, “Construction of tissue-engineered cornea composed of amniotic epithelial cells and acellular porcine cornea for treating corneal alkali burn,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 28, pp. 6748–6759, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Huang, F.-W. Tseng, W.-H. Chang et al., “Preparation of acellular scaffold for corneal tissue engineering by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction technology,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 58, pp. 238–243, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Hao, J. Zhou, J. Tan et al., “Preclinical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of a new bioartificial cornea,” Bioactive Materials, vol. 29, no. Nov. 2023, pp. 265–278, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-J. Lin, T.-J. Wang, T.-W. Li et al., “Development of decellularized cornea by organic acid treatment for corneal regeneration,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 25, no. 7–8, pp. 652–662, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. He, F. Forest, A. Bernard et al., “Cutting and decellularization of multiple corneal stromal lamellae for the bioengineering of endothelial grafts,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 57, no. 15, pp. 6639–6651, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-I. Huh, K.-P. Lee, J. Kim, S. Yi, B.-U. Park, and H. K. Kim, “Generation of femtosecond laser-cut decellularized corneal lenticule using hypotonic trypsin-EDTA solution for corneal tissue engineering,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2018, Article ID 2590536, 12 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Van den Bogerd, S. Ní Dhubhghaill, and N. Zakaria, “Characterizing human decellularized crystalline lens capsules as a scaffold for corneal endothelial tissue engineering,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. e2020–e2028, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Qin, S. Zheng, B. Qi, R. Guo, and G. Hou, “Decellularized human stromal lenticules combine with corneal epithelial-like cells: a new resource for corneal tissue engineering,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2019, Article ID 4252514, 10 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. García-Gareta, Y. Abduldaiem, P. Sawadkar, C. Kyriakidis, F. Lali, and K. V. Greco, “Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and future directions,” Journal of Tissue Engineering, vol. 11, Article ID 204173142094290, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, Z. Wu, J. Ge et al., “Development and characterization of acellular porcine corneal matrix using sodium dodecylsulfate,” Cornea, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Isidan, S. Liu, P. Li et al., “Decellularization methods for developing porcine corneal xenografts and future perspectives,” Xenotransplantation, vol. 26, no. 6, Article ID e12564, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Du and X. Wu, “Development and characterization of a full-thickness acellular porcine cornea matrix for tissue engineering,” Artificial Organs, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 691–705, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernández-Pérez, P. W. Madden, and M. Ahearne, “Engineering a corneal stromal equivalent using a novel multilayered fabrication assembly technique,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 26, no. 19–20, pp. 1030–1041, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-C. Liu, E. P. W. Teo, H. P. Ang et al., “Biological corneal inlay for presbyopia derived from small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE),” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1831, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Alio del Barrio, M. Chiesa, N. Garagorri et al., “Acellular human corneal matrix sheets seeded with human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells integrate functionally in an experimental animal model,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 132, pp. 91–100, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Lynch and M. Ahearne, “Strategies for developing decellularized corneal scaffolds,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 108, pp. 42–47, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ahearne and A. P. Lynch, “Early observation of extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels for corneal stroma regeneration,” Tissue Engineering Part C Methods, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1059–1069, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gonzalez-Andrades, J. de la Cruz Cardona, A. M. Ionescu, A. Campos, M. Del Mar Perez, and M. Alaminos, “Generation of bioengineered corneas with decellularized xenografts and human keratocytes,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 215–222, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hazra, J. Akepogu, S. Krishna, S. Pulipaka, B. Bagga, and C. Ramachandran, “Use of decellularized SMILE (Small-Incision lenticule extraction) lenticules for engineering the corneal endothelial layer: a proof-of-concept,” Current Eye Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 251–262, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sasaki, S. Funamoto, Y. Hashimoto et al., “In vivo evaluation of a novel scaffold for artificial corneas prepared by using ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure to decellularize porcine corneas,” Molecular Vision, vol. 15, pp. 2022–2028, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Hashimoto, S. Funamoto, S. Sasaki et al., “Preparation and characterization of decellularized cornea using high-hydrostatic pressurization for corneal tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 3941–3948, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Guler, B. Aslan, P. Hosseinian, and H. M. Aydin, “Supercritical carbon dioxide-assisted decellularization of aorta and cornea,” Tissue Engineering Part C Methods, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 540–547, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Topuz, G. Günal, S. Guler, and H. M. Aydin, “Use of supercritical CO2 in soft tissue decellularization,” Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 157, pp. 49–79, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-M. Liang, D.-J. Hsieh, F.-W. Tseng, P. Srinivasan, M.-L. Yeh, and M.-C. Tai, “Acellular porcine cornea produced by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction: a potential substitute for human corneal regeneration,” Cornea, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 328–338, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ahearne and J. Fernández-Pérez, “Fabrication of corneal extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 2145, pp. 159–168, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Oh, M. K. Kim, H. J. Lee, J. H. Ko, W. R. Wee, and J. H. Lee, “Processing porcine cornea for biomedical applications,” Tissue Engineering Part C Methods, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 635–645, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernández-Pérez, K. E. Kador, A. P. Lynch, and M. Ahearne, “Characterization of extracellular matrix modified poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun scaffolds with differing fiber orientations for corneal stroma regeneration,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 108, Article ID 110415, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Li, C. Xie, H. Wang, F. Zhang, and L. Mu, “A novel serum: electrophoresis method to prepare acellular corneal matrix as an artificial corneal scaffold,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shao, J. Tang, Y. Zhou et al., “A novel method in preparation of acellularporcine corneal stroma tissue for lamellar keratoplasty,” American Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 2612–2629, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Feng and W. Wang, “In vivo confocal microscopic observation of lamellar corneal transplantation in the rabbit using xenogenic acellular corneal scaffolds as a substitute,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 128, no. 7, pp. 933–940, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Wu, Y. Zhou, N. Li et al., “The use of phospholipase A(2) to prepare acellular porcine corneal stroma as a tissue engineering scaffold,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 21, pp. 3513–3522, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-J. Cen, W. Wang, Y. Feng, and Y. Feng, “Preliminary studies of constructing a tissue-engineered lamellar corneal graft by culturing mesenchymal stem cells onto decellularized corneal matrix,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Rodella, L. Bosio, S. Ferrari et al., “Porcine cornea storage ex vivo model as an alternative to human donor tissues for investigations of endothelial layer preservation,” Translational Vision Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 24, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Subasinghe, K. C. Ogbuehi, L. Mitchell, and G. J. Dias, “Animal model with structural similarity to human corneal collagen fibrillar arrangement,” Anatomical Science International, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 286–293, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kafarnik, L. A. Faraj, D. S. J. Ting, J. N. Goh, D. G. Said, and H. S. Dua, “Ex vivo demonstration of canine corneal pre-Descemet’s anatomy using pneumodissection as for the big bubble technique for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 5922, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Turchyn, M. Marushchak, I. Krynytska, and I. Klishch, “Clinical efficacy of therapeutic keratoplasty using corneal xenografts in patients with corneal ulcers,” Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 257–263, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, M. Li, L. Gu et al., “Risk factors influencing survival of acellular porcine corneal stroma in infectious keratitis: a prospective clinical study,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 434, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. El-Massry, O. Ibrahim, M. Abdalla, I. Osman, and S. Mahmoud, “Safety and indicative effectiveness of porcine corneal lenticular implants in patients with advanced keratoconus and post lasik ectasia: a retrospective clinical study,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 15, pp. 3165–3171, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Alió Del Barrio and J. L. Alió, “Cellular therapy of the corneal stroma: a new type of corneal surgery for keratoconus and corneal dystrophies,” Eye and Vision (London, England), vol. 5, no. 1, p. 28, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Riau, Y.-C. Liu, G. H. F. Yam, and J. S. Mehta, “Stromal keratophakia: corneal inlay implantation,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 75, no. Mar. 2020, Article ID 100780, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kuşoğlu, K. Yangın, S. N. Özkan et al., “Different decellularization methods in bovine lung tissue reveals distinct biochemical composition, stiffness, and viscoelasticity in reconstituted hydrogels,” ACS Applied Bio Materials, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 793–805, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fooladi, S. Faramarz, S. Dabiri, A. Kajbafzadeh, M. H. Nematollahi, and M. Mehrabani, “An efficient strategy to recellularization of a rat aorta scaffold: an optimized decellularization, detergent removal, and Apelin-13 immobilization,” Biomaterials Research, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 46, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Mendibil, R. Ruiz-Hernandez, S. Retegi-Carrion, N. Garcia-Urquia, B. Olalde-Graells, and A. Abarrategi, “Tissue-specific decellularization methods: rationale and strategies to achieve regenerative compounds,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 15, p. 5447, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-C. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Jin, D.-L. Jiang, X.-S. Wei, and H.-T. Xie, “Lamellar keratoplasty treatment of fungal corneal ulcers with acellular porcine corneal stroma,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1068–1075, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Wilson, J. Jones, and J. Marshall, “Biomechanical evaluation of decellularized and crosslinked corneal implants manufactured from porcine corneas as a treatment option for advanced keratoconus,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 2022, Article ID 862969, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Daoud, R. Smith, T. Smith, E. K. Akpek, D. E. Ward, and W. J. Stark, “The intraoperative impression and postoperative outcomes of gamma-irradiated corneas in corneal and glaucoma patch surgery,” Cornea, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1387–1391, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Utine, J. H. Tzu, and E. K. Akpek, “Lamellar keratoplasty using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 170–174.e1, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wu, X. Jin, Y. Xu, and Y. Yang, “Treatment of corneal perforation with lenticules from small incision lenticule extraction surgery: a preliminary study of 6 patients,” Cornea, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 658–663, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Min Klimesova, M. Nemcokova, M. Netukova et al., Corneal Stromal Lenticule Transplantation for the Treatment of Corneal Ulcers, Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2023.
C. Xue, Y. Xia, Y. Chen, L. Yang, and Z. Huang, “[Treatment of large corneal perforations with acellular multilayer of corneal stromal lenticules harvested from femtosecond laser lenticule extraction],” [Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi] Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 655–659, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
M. El Zarif, J. L. Alió, J. L. Alió Del Barrio et al., “Corneal stromal regeneration therapy for advanced keratoconus: long-term outcomes at 3 years,” Cornea, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 741–754, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Alexandra Procházková et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

130

Downloads

94

Citations