Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Mediators of Inflammation in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: State of the Art

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 145293 |

Sylvie Hermouet, Edith Bigot-Corbel, Betty Gardie, "Pathogenesis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Role and Mechanisms of Chronic Inflammation", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2015, Article ID 145293, 16 pages, 2015.

Pathogenesis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Role and Mechanisms of Chronic Inflammation

Academic Editor: Mirella Giovarelli
Received03 Jul 2015
Accepted19 Aug 2015
Published11 Oct 2015


Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal diseases characterized by the excessive and chronic production of mature cells from one or several of the myeloid lineages. Recent advances in the biology of MPNs have greatly facilitated their molecular diagnosis since most patients present with mutation(s) in the JAK2, MPL, or CALR genes. Yet the roles played by these mutations in the pathogenesis and main complications of the different subtypes of MPNs are not fully elucidated. Importantly, chronic inflammation has long been associated with MPN disease and some of the symptoms and complications can be linked to inflammation. Moreover, the JAK inhibitor clinical trials showed that the reduction of symptoms linked to inflammation was beneficial to patients even in the absence of significant decrease in the JAK2-V617F mutant load. These observations suggested that part of the inflammation observed in patients with JAK2-mutated MPNs may not be the consequence of JAK2 mutation. The aim of this paper is to review the different aspects of inflammation in MPNs, the molecular mechanisms involved, the role of specific genetic defects, and the evidence that increased production of certain cytokines depends or not on MPN-associated mutations, and to discuss possible nongenetic causes of inflammation.

1. Introduction

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare hematologic diseases characterized by the clonal proliferation of mature blood elements from several myeloid lineages, associated in certain cases with bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and/or hepatomegaly. They include chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), three related entities named polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (called Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Phi-negative) MPNs), chronic eosinophilic leukaemia, mastocytosis, and unclassifiable MPNs [1]. CML and other MPNs are classified based on the presence or the absence of the BCR-ABL fusion gene which is the hallmark of CML [2]. This review focuses solely on Phi-negative MPNs. Three types of molecular markers are associated with Phi-negative MPNs: activating mutations in the JAK2 gene (JAK2-V617F being the most frequent mutation, present in all subtypes of MPNs); activating mutations in the MPL gene (MPL-W515L/K mostly); and alterations of CALR, the gene coding calreticulin (CALR), detected in ET and in PMF [311]. A small percentage of MPN patients (<15%) do not carry mutations in the JAK2, MPL, or CALR genes.

The exact roles played by JAK2, MPL, and CALR mutations in the pathogenesis, phenotype, and complications of the three MPN subtypes are not fully elucidated. None of the JAK2-V617F, MPL-W515L/K, or CALR mutations is specific of a particular MPN subtype. They are detected in patients with very different phenotype and disease evolution, and therefore their presence alone is not sufficient to explain the clinical presentation and complications observed in MPN patients. Moreover, for subsets of patients, the JAK2-V617F mutation has been shown to be a rather late event, sometimes recurrent, which indicates that other genetic events are responsible for clonality in these patients [1418]. Interestingly, some of the clinical symptoms and complications appear to be linked to the chronic inflammation which almost always accompanies MPN disease, and reduction of symptoms linked to inflammation is beneficial to patients [19, 20]. Presently it is unclear whether the inflammation-related biological markers and clinical symptoms observed in MPN patients are consecutive or reactive to, or perhaps even precede, the main mutations harbored by MPN clones. Obviously, a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie inflammation in the different MPN subtypes should have a significant impact on the design of future protocols tested for the therapy of MPNs. To help address this issue, the present review describes the role played by somatic as well as germline genetic defects in the increased production of inflammatory cytokines and other inflammation markers in MPNs; potential nongenetic causes of chronic inflammation are also discussed.

2. Chronic Inflammation, including Inflammation Associated with Solid Cancer or MPNs

Inflammation is a pathological process typically triggered by an external aggression, which may be a physical or chemical injury, irradiation, or infection. In addition, chronic hypoxia (e.g., when cells accumulate in a solid tumor or in the bone marrow in the context of blood malignancy or in any type of tissue in case of venous or arterial thrombosis) can also lead to inflammation [2123]. Chronic inflammation is characterized by the prolonged stimulation of the production of immune blood cells from the lymphoid and myeloid lineages and the release of various mediators, notably inflammatory cytokines, in blood vessels and in tissues. Myelopoiesis is stimulated during inflammation so as to produce sufficient quantities of polyclonal granulocytes, monocytes, and macrophages to ensure the destruction of damaged cells, tissues, or infectious pathogens, adequate phagocytosis, and presentation of antigens to lymphocytes. The production of polyclonal megakaryocytes and platelets is frequently increased, to ensure thrombus formation and hemostasis in case of damaged blood vessels in inflamed tissues. Chronic inflammation may lead to hypoxia of variable severity in the damaged tissues and, accordingly, to increased production of polyclonal erythroid progenitors and red blood cells in an effort to improve cell and tissue oxygenation. Conversely, hypoxia can lead to increased production of inflammatory cytokines: individuals with mountain sickness present with elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood, and healthy volunteers exposed to a hypoxic environment (three nights in high altitude above 3400 meters) presented with a high level of interleukin- (IL-) 6 [24, 25]. Patients with Chuvash polycythemia associated with homozygous germline mutation in the Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene, a major actor of the hypoxia sensing pathway, present with elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α and interferon- (IFN-) γ [26]. Inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis also provide evidence of cross talk between hypoxia and inflammation [27]. In rheumatoid arthritis, hypoxia-inducible factor- (HIF-) 2α is the HIF isoform that plays a major role in inflammation, notably by inducing expression of IL-6 and TNF-α [28]. Importantly, HIF-1α plays an essential role in survival and function of myeloid cells during inflammation [29].

If the initial “injury” persists, the inflammation response and associated chronic stimulation of hematopoiesis are prolonged, and the risk of DNA alteration increases in cells from the damaged tissues or/and in overstimulated hematopoietic progenitors. Over time the acquisition of genetic defects in the inflamed tissues or/and hematopoietic progenitors may eventually lead to the development of solid cancer or/and clonal hematopoiesis and hematological malignancy (Figure 1). In fact, all types of solid and blood cancers, including MPNs, are accompanied by some degree of chronic inflammation [21, 22]. The mechanisms of inflammation in the context of cancer are complex and multiple. Chronic inflammation is an early event in many types of cancers and in certain lymphoma but in MPNs, the possibility that chronic inflammation precedes the acquisition of the main MPN mutations is a new subject of research. Whatever its chronology, chronic inflammation facilitates further DNA alteration in cancer and adjacent cells, and targeting inflammation and its causes should offer new opportunities of cancer treatment and also help reduce complications [2123].

In the context of solid cancer, chronic inflammation may be reactive to a persistent tissue injury (exposure to toxics or to infectious agents) or/and to the tumor itself; it may also be a consequence of tumor-associated mutations or of treatment (radiotherapy or chemotherapy) (Figure 2). Thus inflammation may precede or/and accompany malignancy, and polyclonal hematopoietic cells of the myeloid and lymphoid lineages participate in the inflammation process. Whatever the cause(s) of inflammation, sustained stimulation of the proliferation of lymphoid or myeloid cells to maintain inflammation over months or years increases the risk of DNA alteration in these cells and the subsequent emergence of a mutated clone (initiation of malignancy) or of additional mutated clones (during or after radio- or chemotherapy). Figure 2 represents progression from chronic inflammation and stimulation of polyclonal myelopoiesis to clonal myelopoiesis, expansion of a mutated myeloid clone, and myeloid malignancy.

In MPNs, cells from all myeloid lineages may belong to the malignant clone: erythroid cells, megakaryocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes; B-lymphocytes or/and T-lymphocytes may be mutated too, but only rarely and usually in PMF [30]. In contrast to patients with solid cancer, for whom myelopoiesis is normal and polyclonal, the immune response in patients with MPNs includes the mobilization and activity of mutated (clonal) myeloid cells as well as of healthy myeloid and lymphoid cells. Depending on the small or large size of the MPN clone, the myeloid part of immune and inflammatory responses may be partially or mostly clonal and subsequently mildly or severely defective. This side of myeloid malignancy is often neglected but likely important in the pathogenesis and complications of MPNs.

One cause of chronic inflammation recognized as increasing the risk of malignant transformation of affected cells and tissues is chronic infection. Indeed it is now well established that latent infection can be associated with various types of solid cancer or/and with lymphoid malignancy [3137]. In blood malignancies, two main transforming mechanisms may be at play: direct cell infection and transformation by oncogenic molecules or indirect transformation via chronic antigen stimulation and cell proliferation resulting in increased risk of acquisition of genetic defects.

2.1. Molecular Pathways Activated in Chronic Inflammation

During inflammation, cytokines are released which signal cells such as T-lymphocytes and monocytes-macrophages to travel to the site of injury. In turn, activated immune cells increase their production of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, hematopoietic cytokines, and other growth factors, hereby stimulating numerous cell types from their environment (fibroblasts and endothelial cells), which further increases the production of inflammatory cytokines. In this context, the nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) and JAK1/STAT1 pathways are the two main molecular pathways activated to enhance the production of inflammation cytokines (Figures 3 and 4) [12, 21, 38]. In case of inflammation linked to hypoxia, which may occur after thrombosis or because of cell accumulation, the production of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors by the cells exposed to hypoxia is upregulated via the HIF-1α pathway [39, 40]. As shown in Figure 3, the NF-κB, HIF-1α, and JAK/STAT pathways interact closely. They act in synergy, NF-κB activating the HIF-1α pathway, which in turn leads to increased activation of several signaling pathways, including JAK2/STAT5 (via the production of erythropoietin (EPO)), STAT3 (via inflammation cytokines from the IL-6 family or via EPO, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)), and STAT1 (via type I and type II inflammatory cytokines) (Figure 4). Moreover, the level of JAK activity affects the expression of transcription factors HIF-1 and HIF-3 [13, 41]. In the context of malignancy, the genetic mutations associated with the tumor may or may not induce the production of inflammation cytokines in mutated cells. This aspect is particularly important in the context of blood cancers since the mutated cells are involved in the immune response or/and are major sources of production of inflammatory cytokines.

Situations where chronic inflammation results from more than one cause are not rare: physical injury and infection, thrombosis and hypoxia, solid cancer and infection, JAK2-mutated MPN and thrombosis, and so forth. The degree of activation and overall synergistic action of the three main pathways which control the production of inflammatory cytokines may vary widely, which allows for infinite qualitative and quantitative differences (Figure 4). Thus the cytokine profile and degree of overproduction of inflammatory cytokines and other mediators of inflammation are expected to vary from patient to patient, according to the cause(s) of inflammation, the cell types being stimulated, and the molecular pathways involved.

2.2. Main Inflammatory Cytokines, Cellular Sources, and Role in Expansion of the MPN Clone

Cytokines may be divided into four groups on the basis of their biological functions: (i) natural immunity, for TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-5, IL-8, and chemokines; (ii) lymphocyte activation, growth, and differentiation, for IL-2, IL-4, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β); (iii) regulation of inflammation, also for IL-4, TGF-β, and IL-1, IL-10, IFN-γ, and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF); and (iv) stimulation of leucocyte growth and differentiation, for IL-1, IL-3, IL-5, IL-6, granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF), macrophage-CSF (M-CSF), and GM-CSF. Cytokines are also classified as Th1 (proinflammatory) cytokines (IL-1, IL-2, IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ) and Th2 (anti-inflammatory) cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10, notably). Th1 cytokines cause stimulation of CD8-positive cytolytic T-lymphocytes, leading, for instance, to viral clearance. Hence the cytokines produced during chronic inflammation vary according to the cause of inflammation and the cell types involved.

The cytokines produced in large quantities during inflammation may also vary according to the molecular pathways that are being activated (due to the acquisition of mutation(s), infection, hypoxia, etc.). The cytokines produced following activation of the NF-κB and JAK1/STAT1 pathways include IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-22, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), TNF-α, TGF-β, platelet-derived growth factor- (PDGF-) BB, b-fibroblast growth factor (FGF), G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-α, macrophage inflammatory protein- (MIP-) 1α, MIP-1β, MIP-3α, HGF, IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), monocyte chemotactic protein- (MCP-) 1, monokine induced by IFN-γ (MIG), and regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) [13, 40, 41]. In case of hypoxia, increased HIF-1α expression leads to the upregulation of the production of EPO, VEGF, insulin growth factor 2 (IGF-2), TNF-α, TGF-β, PDGF, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 2, IL-6, HGF, and its receptor MET (list not exclusive) [42]. Most inflammation cytokines activate the JAK1/STAT3 pathway, thus ensuring enhanced survival of many cell types, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and hematopoietic progenitors. Certain cytokines and growth factors activate other molecular pathways, such as the Smad proteins for TGF-β, JAK1/STAT1 for IFN, or the JAK2/STAT5 pathways for EPO and G-CSF, which stimulate the production of red blood cells and granulocytes, respectively [4346].

In MPNs, several inflammatory cytokines and growth factors (IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF, HGF, VEGF, b-FGF, and TGF-β) are found to be significantly overproduced in all subtypes, yet with a large variability in quantity (Table 1). Of note, TGF-β1 inhibits normal hematopoiesis in humans via its receptor II (TGF-βRII). In cancer cells, a reduced expression of TGF-βRII is frequent, which suggests that malignant MPN progenitors may also acquire resistance to TGF-β1 by downregulating TGF-βRII expression [47, 48]. For certain cytokines, qualitative and quantitative differences in production can be related to the MPN phenotype. Excess production of IL-4, IL-10, and TNF-α has been reported in ET; elevation of IL-11 levels has been described only in PV; and in PMF, many cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines are produced at high levels but IFN-γ levels are usually low (Table 1) [45, 4954].

MPN subtypeCytokines produced in excessMain cellular sources

All MPNsIL-6, IL-8, IL-2, soluble IL-2R, HGF, TNF-, TGF-β, GM-CSF, VEGF, and bFGFBone marrow fibroblasts, endothelial cells, monocytes, macrophages, T-lymphocytes, hematopoietic progenitors, and hepatocytes

ETIL-4, IL-10, IFN-γ, MCP-1, PDGF-BB, and soluble IL-6R (gp80)M2 macrophages, platelets, and T-lymphocytes

PVIL-11, IL-12, IL-13, IL-5, and IL-7Bone marrow fibroblasts, T-lymphocytes, M1 macrophages, and hematopoietic progenitors

PMFIL-1β, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-33, G-CSF, IFN-α, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, IP-10, MIG, MCP-1, and PDGF-BBBone marrow fibroblasts, activated T-lymphocytes, neutrophils, macrophages, hematopoietic progenitors, megakaryocytes, and platelets

The cellular sources of production of inflammation cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors are many and of course vary depending on the MPN subtype and associated complications (thrombosis and bone marrow fibrosis). However, they usually include most of the cell types which constitute the bone marrow microenvironment or hematopoietic niche, fibroblasts, macrophages, T-lymphocytes, and endothelial cells, as well as healthy or mutated (clonal) hematopoietic progenitors and mature blood elements, platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages [5559]. Macrophages may present with a M1 phenotype, where they produce large amounts of TNF-α and IL-12 (both elevated in PV and PMF) as well as IL-23. Macrophages of the M2 phenotype secrete IL-4 or IL-10 (both elevated in ET).

In MPNs the EPO level is low and typically undetectable in PV [60]. The presence of the activating JAK2-V617F mutation in >95% of PV cases likely compensates for the low EPO production by rendering erythroid progenitors highly responsive to low doses of EPO, to result in polycythemia. This explanation is likely also valid for the 50–60% of ET and PMF which are JAK2-V617F-mutated. Intriguingly, blood levels of other cytokines which also activate the JAK2/STAT5 pathways (TPO and G-CSF) or the JAK2/STAT3 pathways (GM-CSF, IL-12, IL-33, and cytokines of the IL-6 family: IL-6, IL-11, and oncostatin M (OSM)) are often normal or elevated in MPNs (Table 2). Several of these cytokines are produced by nonhematopoietic cells and also by myeloid progenitors, and they promote the survival and proliferation of both clonal and nonclonal myeloid progenitor cells. This is the case notably for TPO, IL-6, IL-8, IL-11, IL-33, GM-CSF, HGF, and TNF-α and several of these cytokines have been proven to contribute to the expansion of the JAK2-V617F-mutated cells [5153, 59, 61]. Regarding TPO, it is important to note that the low surface expression of Mpl (the TPO receptor) observed in MPN progenitors and platelets likely limits the effect of high circulating levels of TPO. The reasons for the low expression of Mpl in MPN patients are not fully understood. On one hand, JAK2-V617F is thought to be less efficient than wild type JAK2 to bring Mpl receptors to the cell surface and possibly to increase Mpl destruction. On the other hand, a high TPO level and activating JAK2-V617F or MPL-W515L/K mutations may be ways of counteracting Mpl repression in progenitor cells.

Exposure to infectious pathogensAffected cellsAssociated solid cancerAssociated hematological malignancy

Human T-cell leukemia virus 1 (HTLV-1)T-lymphocytesT-cell leukemia
T-cell lymphoma
Hepatitis C virus
HepatocarcinomaB-cell lymphoma, plasma cell leukemia, MGUS, and myeloma
Hepatitis B virus (Hepadnavirus)HepatocytesHepatocarcinoma
Epstein-Barr virus
(human herpes virus 4)
B-lymphocytesNasopharynxB-cell lymphoma
MGUS, and myeloma
Human herpes virus 8
(herpes virus)
SarcomaB-cell lymphoma, myeloma, and plasma cell leukemia
Human herpes virus 2
(herpes virus)
Epithelial cellsGenital cancer
Human papilloma (papilloma virus)Epithelial cellsGenital cancer
Helicobacter pylori (bacterium)Epithelial cellsGastric carcinomaMALT lymphoma, MGUS, and myeloma
Borrelia burgdorferi (bacterium)Keratinocytes, fibroblasts, dendritic cells, T-lymphocytes, and monocytes/macrophagesSkin lymphoma
Campylobacter jejuni (bacterium)Intestinal cellsImmunoproliferative small intestine disease (IPSID)
Chlamydia psittaci (bacterium)Nasal and pulmonary cellsOcular adnexal lymphoma
Toxoplasma gondii (protozoon)MacrophagesIntraocular B-cell lymphoma
Schistosoma haematobium (Platyhelminthe, Trematoda)Bladder carcinoma
Opisthorchis viverrini (Platyhelminthe, Trematoda)Bile duct carcinoma
Porphyromonas gingivalis
cancer, pancreatic cancer?

Exposure to toxicsAffected cellsAssociated
solid cancer
Associated hematological disorder or malignancy

TobaccoEpithelial cellsLung cancer
Bladder cancer
Chronic stimulation of myelopoiesis
Asbestos fibers (results in asbestosis, an inflammatory condition)Mesothelial cellsMesothelioma
BenzeneAllBladder cancerChronic myelogenous leukemia and other myeloid and lymphoid malignancies

Another intriguing observation is the elevated production of IL-33. IL-33 is an alarmin known to help fight viral infection that is implicated in autoimmunity, and an increased risk of autoimmune disease has been reported in MPN patients [61, 62]. Chronic stimulation by the above cytokines also facilitates the survival and expansion of fibroblasts and fibrosis (IL-6 and b-FGF), monocytes-macrophages (IL-6 and GM-GSF), and platelet production (IL-6) and neoangiogenesis (VEGF), whereas IL-12 and IL-33 activate T-lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells. In addition, MPN cells accumulate in the bone marrow, which leads to some degree of hypoxia and subsequent activation of the HIF-1α pathway, with upregulation of STAT3 expression and production of cytokines which further promote cell survival (IGF-2, HGF, and IL-6), fibrosis (PDGF, FGF2, and IL-6), and neoangiogenesis (VEGF) [42, 63].

Altogether, the qualitative and quantitative differences found in cytokine production in the three MPNs subtypes hint that the causes and mechanisms of chronic inflammation likely differ in ET, PV, and PMF. The JAK2-V617F, MPL-W515L/K, and CALR mutations likely influence clinical symptoms but do not explain differences in inflammation. For instance, JAK2-V617F, MPL, and CALR mutations are detected at similar levels of expression in ET (associated with mild or very mild inflammation) and in PMF (characterized by severe inflammation). Thus it is important to investigate and understand the mechanisms of inflammation at play in each MPN subtype, including those independent of JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutations.

2.3. Main Clinical and Biological Symptoms

The main clinical symptoms observed in MPNs which are linked to an increased production of inflammation cytokines are fatigue, fever, itching, night sweats, weight loss, and, to some extent, splenomegaly. These symptoms are frequent in PMF; they occur in PV but are mostly absent in ET, which is a good reflection of the degree of production of inflammation cytokines characteristic of PMF (high or very high), PV (moderate to high), and ET (mild).

The main biological parameters routinely assessed which are affected in case of inflammation include blood cell counts (in particular leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts), iron levels, and several proteins: the C-reactive protein (CRP), haptoglobin, alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (orosomucoid), ferritin and fibrinogen (increased), and albumin and transferrin (decreased). The major stimulus of increased synthesis by liver (hepatocytes) is IL-6. These inflammatory proteins present with different kinetics: inflammatory positive markers which are increased early include CRP, haptoglobin, and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein, whereas fibrinogen, ferritin, and transferrin are late-acting inflammatory proteins.

Elevation of the leukocyte and platelet counts is typical of MPNs and thus does not allow distinguishing between inflammation and MPN. CRP is elevated in MPNs, particularly in PMF, and pentraxin 3 has been reported to decrease in MPNs [64]. A high CRP and low pentraxin 3 were linked to a high risk of thrombotic events in PV and in ET, and a high CRP was associated with shortened leukemia-free survival in MPN patients with myelofibrosis [64, 65]. The level of IL-6 in serum is almost constantly increased in case of MPN but IL-6 levels (and other inflammatory cytokines) are not measured in routine laboratory practice.

3. Activation of the Molecular Pathways of Inflammation by MPN-Associated Mutations

MPNs are characterized by the activating JAK2-V617F and MPL-W515L/K mutations, the CALR mutations, and also high levels of total Jak2 (wild type and V617F-mutated) in neutrophils and platelets [310]. The effect of JAK2-V617F mutation is to activate primarily the STAT5 pathways but the STAT3 pathways are also activated (Figure 4) [66]. The MPL-W515L/K mutations presumably stabilize Mpl, the Jak2-coupled dimeric receptor for TPO [67]. TPO is known to stimulate the JAK/STAT pathways and also PI3K/AKT, ERK, p38, NF-κB, and HIF [6769]. Accordingly, in transfected cells expression of MPL-W515L/K mutants resulted in increased activation of ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinases) 1 and ERK 2 (ERK1/2) and AKT (protein kinase B) in absence and in presence of TPO [5, unpublished observations]. To our knowledge, the effect of MPL-W515L/K mutations on NF-κB and HIF has not been studied. In any case, the JAK2-V617F mutation activates STAT3 and the MPL-W515L/K mutations activate STAT1 and STAT3, which implies that they may stimulate the production of inflammatory cytokines (Figure 4). However, in MPN progenitor cells and platelets, the expression of Mpl receptors at the membrane surface is often very low, which likely attenuates the effect of TPO stimulation and MPL-W515L/K mutation.

The molecular pathways possibly activated by CALR mutations remain unclear. Calreticulin is a calcium-binding protein chaperone normally located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER); the CALR mutations associated with MPNs all result in C-terminal truncated forms of calreticulin located in the cytosol. Thus it is presumed but not formally demonstrated that CALR mutants may affect intracellular calcium flux as well as the trafficking and secretion of glycoproteins, which could potentially lead to altered expression and activation of cytokines, receptors, Jak2, and other signaling molecules. Consistently, the initial papers reported an activation of the JAK2/STAT5 pathway in transfected cells which expressed CALR exon 9 mutants [8, 9]. However, the precise molecular mechanisms linking CALR mutants and the JAK2/STAT5 pathway have not been identified.

More rarely, in ET or PMF the “driving” mutation may be a loss-of-function mutation in the LNK gene or in the CBL gene [7074]. LNK is an adaptor protein which acts as a negative regulator of TPO/Mpl-mediated activation of JAK2. Expression of LNK loss-of-function mutants also results in enhanced activation of the JAK2/STAT5 pathway. CBL codes for an E3-ubiquitin ligase which promotes the ubiquitination of signaling molecules, including tyrosine kinases. The CBL mutations detected in MPNs cause the loss of E3-ubiquitin ligase activity, thus resulting in increased signaling and cell proliferation. So far there is no evidence that LNK or CBL mutations induce the production of inflammatory cytokines, but they may alter their signaling. Figure 4 summarizes the pathways activated by the main MPN-driving mutations.

Mutations in the TET2, IDH1, IDH2, EZH2, ASLX1, or DNMT3A genes may also be found in MPNs. They are not specific of MPNs: they are found also in other blood and solid malignancies. Their main action is to alter the regulation of gene expression [7583]. TET2 and IDH1/2 mutants impair the hydroxylation of methylcytosine and thus affect DNA methylation. More precisely, TET gene products catalyze the conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxy-methylcytosine (5-OH-MeC), a reaction that depends in part on iron and oxygen [80, 81]. EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) gene codes for a histone methyl transferase, and ASXL1 (additional sex combs like transcriptional regulator 1) gene product belongs to the Polycomb group of proteins and thus is thought to disrupt chromatin and alter gene transcription. DNMT3A codes for a DNA methyltransferase and mutations presumably alter the epigenetic regulation of gene expression [82]. Thus one cannot exclude that these mutations may alter the expression of genes coding for inflammatory cytokines or receptors. Interestingly, some of these mutations have been shown to precede JAK2-V617F [15].

4. Inflammatory Cytokines Produced as a Consequence of MPN-Associated Mutations

Not surprisingly, JAK2-V617F has received most of the attention. Several groups have studied the production of inflammation cytokines in JAK2-V617F-mutated cells or in murine JAK2-V617F-driven MPN models. So far published reports concluded that, in vitro, JAK2-V617F can increase the production of IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, OSM, CCL3, CCL4, and TNF-α [53, 59, 84, 85]. However, in MPN patients there is no correlation between the JAK2-V617F burden and the blood or serum levels of these cytokines. In fact, it is highly probable that only a fraction of these cytokines is under the control of JAK2-V617F. Firstly, IL-6, IL-8, and OSM are abundantly produced by nonhematopoietic (nonclonal and nonmutated) cells [5153]. Secondly, certain molecules produced under the control of JAK2-V617F, such as OSM, in turn stimulate the production of other inflammatory cytokines in a JAK2-V617F-independent manner [85]. Thirdly, in the JAK2-V617F+/+ HEL cell line, anti-JAK2 miRNA experiments had only a partial inhibiting effect on IL-6 mRNA expression; in these experiments, anti-JAK2 miRNA experiments had no effect on the expression of IL-11 and HGF [53]. Thus in JAK2-V617F-mutated cells, major inflammatory cytokines may be controlled partially (IL-6) or totally (IL-11 and HGF) by molecular pathways not regulated by JAK2-V617F.

Regarding MPL-W515 mutations, only one group reported the analysis of inflammation cytokines produced in MPL-W515L-mutated cells, in a murine bone marrow transplantation model: expression of MPL-W515L was associated with a significant increase in the production of IL-6, IL-10, IL-12 (p40), TNF-α, CSF3, and chemokines CCL2, CXCL9, and CXCL10 [84]. Again, MPL-W515L-mutated cells were not the sole source of production of these cytokines.

Regarding the CALR exon 9 mutations associated with MPNs, their effect on cytokine expression is not known. It is interesting to note that soluble calreticulin has been reported associated with increased production of IL-6 and TNF-α [86].

Regarding TET2, IDH1/2, and ASXL1 mutations, it was reported that mutated forms of IDH1/2 were associated with specific DNA hypermethylation profiles, and the list of genes found to be differentially methylated includes several genes linked to inflammation, particularly the IL11-Rα and TGF-βRI receptors [79]. Interestingly, IL-11 and TGF-β are secreted at high levels in case of inflammation and both alter myelopoiesis. IL-11Rα is also differentially methylated in TET2-mutated cells [79]. Hypermethylation of the genes encoding IL11-Rα and TGF-βRI receptors would presumably lower their expression and subsequently make clonal progenitor cells less sensitive to the inhibiting action of TGF-β and anti-inflammatory action of IL-11. Since TET2 and IDH1/2 mutations are mostly found in PMF, it is possible that these mutants play a role in the aggravation of inflammation observed in severe forms of PMF [87, 88]. In myelodysplastic syndromes, ASXL1 mutations combined with SETBP1 mutations were reported to repress the TGF-β pathways [89]. However no study of cytokine or receptor protein expression in relation to ASXL1 mutation in MPNs has been published.

5. Inflammatory Cytokines Produced as a Consequence of Germline Genetic Defects

Germline defects, variants, or haplotypes can affect, directly or indirectly, the expression or signaling of inflammatory cytokines and receptors, thus potentially attenuating or aggravating chronic inflammation. The 46/1 (JAK2 GGCC) haplotype and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in JAK2, in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), in the MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus (MECOM), or in HBS1L-MYB have been reported to be associated with a predisposition to mutation in the JAK2 gene on the same allele (JAK2 GGCC haplotype) or a predisposition to the development of a MPN (MECOM, TERT, JAK2, and HBS1L-MYB variants) [9094]. To this day it remains unclear how these hereditary genetic variants act to facilitate the development of MPNs, but alteration of the transcription of the concerned genes is possible. Regarding germline JAK2 variation, inappropriate expression of JAK2 would clearly disturb myelopoiesis and alter the contribution of myeloid cells to inflammation responses. Consistently, the JAK2 GGCC haplotype was reported to be associated with a defective response to cytokine stimulation, increased risk of inflammation, and impaired defense against infection [95, 96]. In CML, cells with short telomere length were found to express a specific “telomere-associated” cytokine and chemokine secretory phenotype [97]. Little is known on the functional effects of MECOM variants on cytokine production but Yasui et al. recently reported that the EVI1 oncoprotein could alter TGF-β signaling and TGF-β-mediated growth inhibition [98, 99].

It is established that variations due to SNPs in the promoter region of genes coding for inflammatory cytokines and receptors potentially affect their production. Many groups have published SNPs associated with an altered production of a cytokine or a cytokine receptor, and such SNPs concern all the main cytokines involved in inflammation: IL-1, IL-1Rα, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-33, TNF-α, HGF, and MCP1/CCL2 [100115]. SNPs have been shown to control the expression of these cytokines in vitro and individuals who carry the SNP are described as high or low producers [116118]. Cytokine polymorphisms have been studied in association with specific diseases, response to infectious agents, or immune response to inflammation. To our knowledge, this type of analyses has never been performed in MPNs.

6. Clonal and Nonclonal Chronic Inflammation in MPNs

Chronic inflammation associated with MPN may have several causes, and their recognition should allow offering improved and individualized treatment to MPN patients.

6.1. MPN-Related Chronic Inflammation
6.1.1. Clonal Inflammation

As described above, part of the inflammation is clonal since MPN clonal cells produce inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-11, OSM, TNF-α, CCL3 (MIP-1α), and CCL4 (MIP-1β)); the eventual acquisition of IDH1/2 or TET2 mutations may aggravate “clonal inflammation” by altering the expression of certain receptors (IL-11Rα, TGF-βR1). The consequences are multiple: (i) enhanced survival and growth of clonal cells (IL-6, IL-8, IL-11, and TNF-α); (ii) increased production of inflammation cytokines that target bone marrow stromal cells as well as hematopoietic progenitors, via the action of OSM, IL-11, and IL-6; (iii) resistance of clonal cells to growth inhibitors, via a reduced expression of IL-11Rα or TGF-βR1 [53, 59, 61, 63, 119, 120]. In addition, clonal cells can recruit and activate neutrophils, monocytes, and natural killer cells via the production of CCL3 and CCL4; the neutrophils and monocytes potentially recruited may be clonal or non-clonal.

6.1.2. Nonclonal, Reactive Inflammation

Any malignant process induces nonclonal immune responses which aim to restrict and eventually destroy the malignant cells. In case of advanced disease, clonal cells accumulate and nonclonal, hypoxia-induced inflammation can develop. Nonclonal inflammation may also be reactive to treatment. In MPNs, the mature myeloid cells which participate in the antitumoral or hypoxia-induced or therapy-related “reactive” inflammation response may be clonal or nonclonal. Depending on the MPN subtype, the size of the clonal population is likely to be large (PV and PMF) or moderate or small (ET), implying that the clonal part of reactive inflammation is probably more significant in PMF and PV than in ET. This should not be overlooked because clonal cells likely mount a less efficient immune response than healthy cells, meaning that the inflammation/immune response could be rather inefficient in PV and PMF. Consistently, an increased risk of a second cancer was reported in MPN patients [121].

6.2. Chronic Inflammation and Myeloid Stimulation as Predisposition to MPNs

The observation that major inflammatory cytokines are produced independently of MPN-associated mutations and the demonstration that JAK2-V617F can be a late event in MPN development are consistent with the hypothesis that chronic stimulation of myelopoiesis (via inflammation) may precede the acquisition of mutation in the JAK2 (MPL and CALR?) gene(s) in subsets of MPN patients. A frequent objection is the lack of evidence of inflammation or myeloid stimulation prior to the diagnosis of a MPN. However, it is not rare that routine blood tests of patients, especially older patients, reveal a slight elevation of leukocyte or platelet counts, or hematocrit, with or without biological evidence of mild inflammation. There are dozens of reasons for mild alterations of blood counts, ranging from smoking, stress, obesity, and diverse latent infections to mild forms of chronic inflammatory diseases (intestinal, rheumatoid, skin, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, etc.). Such patients are simply observed; investigation begins when blood counts rise significantly (reach at least one of the WHO criteria of MPN) or when patients present clinical symptoms related to MPN or to the underlying cause of chronic myeloid stimulation or inflammation. Also, it is not rare to detect lymphoid infiltrates in the bone marrow of MPN patients and monocytosis or lymphopenia in peripheral blood, sometimes prior to the diagnosis of MPN; these observations may be considered as evidence of a disturbed immune response. Thorough investigation of the stages preceding the diagnosis of overt MPN, similar, for instance, to the studies that established monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) as the precancerous stage of multiple myeloma, is needed in MPNs to validate the hypothesis of chronic (antigen-mediated or not) stimulation of myelopoiesis preceding the acquisition of JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutation.

The chronic inflammation and myeloid stimulation hypothesis is attractive, because it can explain several if not all of the mysteries that persist in MPNs. For instance, chronic myeloid stimulation allows the recurrent acquisition of JAK2-V617F, multiple JAK2 mutations, and combinations of JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutations regularly reported in MPNs. Early chronic inflammation and myeloid stimulation would explain that JAK2-V617F burden and clinical symptoms and disease severity are not correlated. The recent reports that patients under treatment with JAK inhibitors may develop or reactivate viral infection, possibly due to impaired NK cell function, are also consistent with chronic infection contributing to the inflammation associated with MPNs [122]. Importantly, the chronic stimulation hypothesis allows for multiple causes of inflammation, infectious or not, some mild (as observed in ET) and some severe (as typical of PMF). Last but not least, the chronic myeloid stimulation hypothesis allows for many different initial causes and thus would explain why the JAK2-V617F mutation and to a lesser degree the MPL exon 10 and CALR exon 9 mutations are associated with very different diseases (ET, PV, PMF, RARS-T, and splanchnic thrombosis for JAK2-V617F; ET, PMF, and RARS-T for MPL and CALR mutations). For all these reasons, chronic myeloid stimulation and inflammation, and notably latent infection, deserve investigation as initial, early, or complicating events of MPNs.

Indeed chronic exposure to various toxic compounds or to infectious pathogens and subsequent chronic inflammation frequently precedes malignant cell transformation in the context of solid cancers; importantly, the same toxics or infectious agents associated with solid cancer may also lead to lymphoid malignancy (Table 2) [3137]. Normal immune responses following infection include the stimulation of myelopoiesis (granulocytes and monocytes). The production of B-lymphocytes and plasma cells is stimulated to produce polyclonal Ig. If infection becomes chronic, a focusing of the Ig response from polyclonal to monoclonal (mc) immunoglobulins (Ig) may occur, and that will persist as long as the infection. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), or Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) stimulate polyclonal B-cell proliferation, and these pathogens are implicated in several B-cell malignancies (Burkitt, Hodgkin, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia) via cell infection and direct transformation (EBV and HCV), via antigen-driven stimulation (H. pylori), or both (EBV and HCV) [3237]. Moreover, EBV, cytomegalovirus (CMV), HHV-8, and HHV-6 can induce a chronic monoclonal Ig response [123126].

In support of the hypothesis that infection may predispose to chronic hematological malignancy, we showed that, for about 25% of patients with multiple myeloma, the purified mc Ig specifically recognizes an antigen from HCV, EBV, or H. pylori [124127]. These important findings suggest that infectious agents may also initiate multiple myeloma, not just certain types of lymphoma, which opens new possibilities of curative treatment, as demonstrated recently by the regression of one case of HCV-associated myeloma following treatment by IFN-γ  [128]. Antigen-driven proliferation as a facilitator of DNA mutation acquisition and cell transformation is rarely investigated in the context of myeloid malignancies but since chronic antigen stimulation also concerns myeloid cells, latent infection as a cause of inflammation in chronic myeloid disorders should not be excluded. Thus a promising research approach for chronic myeloid disorders is to propose that, for subsets of patients, malignancy may result from chronic, polyclonal abnormal immune response by myeloid cells, eventually facilitating excessive myeloid proliferation, acquisition of genetic alterations in genes that are critical for myelopoiesis (JAK2 and MPL; CALR?), and transformation of progenitor cells from the most stimulated lineage(s) and then expansion of a malignant clone.

7. Consequences for the Treatment of MPNs

Logically, the JAK2-V617F mutation rapidly became the main target of treatment in MPNs after its discovery in 2005. In contrast, chronic inflammation has so far been neglected in the treatment of these diseases.

Recognition of the importance of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MPNs offers great opportunities to improve therapy. The JAK inhibitor trials showed that blocking JAK2 function significantly reduced inflammatory cytokine levels and other markers of inflammation in PMF patients, resulting in improved clinical symptoms. Patients benefited from JAK inhibitors even when the JAK2-V617F mutant burden was not reduced or when their disease was not associated with JAK2 mutation. Although the comprehension of the causes and mechanisms of inflammation in MPNs is still very incomplete, accumulated knowledge indicates that NF-κB and JAK1 are major pathways for the production or/and signaling of inflammatory cytokines. In certain cases, the HIF-1α pathways may also be activated. The three pathways are closely linked (Figures 3 and 4), and used alone, inhibitors of the JAK/STAT pathways (or inhibitors of NF-κB) cannot be expected to completely block cytokine production and signalling in MPNs. In a murine model of JAK2-V617F-mutated MPN, selective STAT blocking resulted in increased inflammation and thrombocytosis [129]. In fact, alteration of STAT3 function (deletion or hyperactivation) is known to lead to altered myelopoiesis and increased expression of STAT1 and inflammatory cytokines, notably IL-6, a strong stimulant of platelet production, fibroblast proliferation, and inflammatory acute phase protein production [130132]. In support of this mechanism, Grisouard et al. reported increased expression of STAT1 and STAT1 target genes in JAK2-V617F mice after STAT3 deletion; IL-6 and other inflammatory cytokines were not measured in this study [129].

Ideally to cure a MPN, one should aim to reduce the effects of the JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutant carried by the MPN clone, as well as the production and signaling of the main inflammation cytokines produced by the patient. This can be achieved by blocking the three main pathways responsible for cytokine production (these include the JAK1/JAK2 pathways) and by suppressing the cause(s) of MPN mutation, when identified. Used alone, JAK1/2 inhibitors have the capacity to block the JAK2-V617F and MPL-W515L/K mutations and a large fraction of the production and signaling of inflammatory cytokines. But for complete treatment of inflammation and mutations in MPNs, the addition of NF-κB and HIF-1α inhibitor drugs should benefit patients [133138]. This contrasts with myeloma, a disease not driven by the activation of the JAK2/STAT pathways where NF-κB and HIF-1α inhibitors used alone can reduce both disease and inflammatory cytokines [139]. Another advantage of such combination therapies would allow lowering the dose of each drug and hopefully reduce toxicity. Of note, one reason why IFN-α is able to induce a complete clinical, biological, and molecular remission (JAK2-V617F-negativation) in PV and in ET patients is that IFN-α acts on several JAK/STAT pathways as well as on other pathways critical for the production of inflammatory cytokines [140, 141]. In short, as represented in Figure 5, the ideal MPN therapy may combine the following: (1) inhibition of the JAK1 pathway and JAK2-V617F, MPL-W515L/K, or CALR mutations with a JAK1/2 inhibitor and (2) NF-κB and HIF inhibitors (note that (1) and (2) may be achieved with IFN-α). Whenever an early cause of chronic inflammation is identified, adequate treatment should be added: for instance, antibiotics or antiviral treatment in case of latent infection.

The complexity of inflammation in MPNs should not discourage attempts to define it biologically at the time of diagnosis, prior to therapeutic decisions, and during treatment monitoring. Knowing the precise inflammation status of each MPN patient would greatly help improve his/her treatment. As described earlier, the inflammation status and cytokine profile of a MPN patient are expected to vary according to the MPN subtype, presence of JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutation, eventual cause of inflammation preceding MPN-driving mutation, and personal genetic background. Yet what matters for therapy is the resulting cytokine profile of the patient, and nowadays establishing the inflammation cytokine profile of an individual is technically simple and not overly expansive and requires only a blood sample. Knowing that a patient is a strong producer of IL-6, HGF, or TNF-α, for instance, would allow focusing treatment on the target cytokine(s), perhaps by adding to the patient’s combination therapy one of the existing antagonist drugs or neutralizing antibodies that specifically block these cytokines or receptors [119, 142144].

Last but not least, extensive genetic studies and murine models have not succeeded to fully explain most of the chronic hematological malignancies, including MPNs. This suggests that genetic aberrations, although crucial, are probably not sufficient for a lymphoid or myeloid malignancy to develop, and more attention is now given to the hematopoietic niche and cytokine production, the human microbiome and oncogenic infectious pathogens, and the host’s immune response [145, 146]. There is no reason to limit these important pathogenic mechanisms to lymphoid malignancies and solid cancer, and perhaps the next major research effort in the MPN field should be to investigate the validity of the hypothesis of chronic inflammation/myeloid stimulation preceding mutation acquisition. More specifically, a systematic search for latent infection in MPN patients is feasible and simple, thanks to various tests based on the multiplexed antigen or peptide microarray technology; these assays require only a small blood sample [127, 147]. Obviously the identification of an infectious cause of inflammation in subsets of MPN patients would offer additional possibilities of combined treatment (with antibiotics or antiviral therapy) (Figure 5). Regarding research and animal models of MPNs, it is possible to develop new murine models of chronic myeloid stimulation, antigen-mediated or not [148].

In conclusion, inflammation is very complex yet there are relatively simple laboratory tools to diagnose and characterize inflammation in patients. Several predictive inflammation markers are already identified in MPNs, and potent drugs that target the molecular pathways of inflammation or the inflammatory cytokines detected in excess in patients already exist. Designing new, more complete, and individualized combination treatments that include drugs that block MPN mutations as well as the main inflammation pathways is possible, and such protocols should benefit MPN patients.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank all the colleagues who contributed to the studies discussed above and to this special issue and are grateful to Professor Pascal Mossuz (Grenoble, France) for critically reading this paper.


  1. A. Tefferi, J. Thiele, and J. W. Vardiman, “The 2008 World Health Organization classification system for myeloproliferative neoplasms: order out of chaos,” Cancer, vol. 115, no. 17, pp. 3842–3847, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Groffen, J. R. Stephenson, N. Heisterkamp, A. de Klein, C. R. Bartram, and G. Grosveld, “Philadelphia chromosomal breakpoints are clustered within a limited region, bcr, on chromosome 22,” Cell, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. James, V. Ugo, J.-P. Le Couédic et al., “A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera,” Nature, vol. 434, no. 7037, pp. 1144–1148, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Kralovics, F. Passamonti, A. S. Buser et al., “A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 17, pp. 1779–1790, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Pikman, B. H. Lee, T. Mercher et al., “MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 3, no. 7, article e270, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. M. Scott, W. Tong, R. L. Levine et al., “JAK2 exon 12 mutations in polycythemia vera and idiopathic erythrocytosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 5, pp. 459–468, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Schnittger, U. Bacher, C. Haferlach et al., “Characterization of 35 new cases with four different MPLW515 mutations and essential thrombocytosis or primary myelofibrosis,” Haematologica, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 141–144, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Klampfl, H. Gisslinger, A. S. Harutyunyan et al., “Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 369, no. 25, pp. 2379–2390, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Nangalia, C. E. Massie, E. J. Baxter et al., “Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with non-mutated JAK2,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 369, no. 25, pp. 2391–2405, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Lippert, M. Boissinot, R. Kralovics et al., “The JAK2-V617F mutation is frequently present at diagnosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1865–1867, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Cleyrat, J. Jelinek, F. Girodon et al., “JAK2 mutation and disease phenotype: a double L611V/V617F in cis mutation of JAK2 is associated with isolated erythrocytosis and increased activation of AKT and ERK1/2 rather than STAT5,” Leukemia, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1069–1073, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Mantovani, “Molecular pathways linking inflammation and cancer,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 369–373, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Fernández-Sánchez, S. Berzal, M.-D. Sánchez-Niño et al., “AG490 promotes HIF-1α accumulation by inhibiting its hydroxylation,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 4014–4023, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Kralovics, S.-S. Teo, S. Li et al., “Acquisition of the V617F mutation of JAK2 is a late genetic event in a subset of patients with myeloproliferative disorders,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1377–1380, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. X. Schaub, R. Looser, S. Li et al., “Clonal analysis of TET2 and JAK2 mutations suggests that TET2 can be a late event in the progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 2003–2007, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Vilaine, D. Olcaydu, A. Harutyunyan et al., “Homologous recombination of wild-type JAK2, a novel early step in the development of myeloproliferative neoplasm,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 24, pp. 6468–6470, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. R. Lambert, T. Everington, D. C. Linch, and R. E. Gale, “In essential thrombocythemia, multiple JAK2-V617F clones are present in most mutant-positive patients: a new disease paradigm,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 14, pp. 3018–3023, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. Lundberg, A. Karow, R. Nienhold et al., “Clonal evolution and clinical correlates of somatic mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Blood, vol. 123, no. 14, pp. 2220–2228, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. C. Hasselbalch, “Perspectives on the impact of JAK-inhibitor therapy upon inflammation-mediated comorbidities in myelofibrosis and related neoplasms,” Expert Review of Hematology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 203–216, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. Pemmaraju, H. Kantarjian, T. Kadia et al., “Phase I/II study of the Janus kinase (JAK)1 and 2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia,” Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 171–176, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Mantovani, P. Allavena, A. Sica, and F. Balkwill, “Cancer-related inflammation,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7203, pp. 436–444, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Yaqub and E. M. Aandahl, “Inflammation versus adaptive immunity in cancer pathogenesis,” Critical Review Oncology, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 43–63, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. M. Crusz and F. R. Balkwill, “Inflammation and cancer: advances and new agents,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. H. Hackett and R. C. Roach, “High-altitude illness,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 345, no. 2, pp. 107–114, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Hartmann, M. Tschöp, R. Fischer et al., “High altitude increases circulating interleukin-6, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and C-reactive protein,” Cytokine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 246–252, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X. Niu, G. Y. Miasnikova, A. I. Sergueeva et al., “Altered cytokine profiles in patients with Chuvash polycythemia,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 74–78, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Biddlestone, D. Bandarra, and S. Rocha, “The role of hypoxia in inflammatory disease (Review),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 859–869, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J.-H. Ryu, C.-S. Chae, J.-S. Kwak et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-2α is an essential catabolic regulator of inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis,” PLoS Biology, vol. 12, no. 6, Article ID e1001881, pp. 1–16, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Cramer, Y. Yamanishi, B. E. Clausen et al., “HIF-1α is essential for myeloid cell-mediated inflammation,” Cell, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 645–657, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. Delhommeau, S. Dupont, C. Tonetti et al., “Evidence that the JAK2 G1849T (V617F) mutation occurs in a lymphomyeloid progenitor in polycythemia vera and idiopathic myelofibrosis,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. Cesarman, Y. Chang, P. S. Moore, J. W. Said, and D. M. Knowles, “Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-related body-cavity-based lymphomas,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, no. 18, pp. 1186–1191, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Parsonnet, Microbes and Malignancy. Infection As a Cause of Human Cancers, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  33. J. I. Cohen, “Epstein-Barr virus infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, no. 7, pp. 481–492, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M.-Q. Du and P. G. Isaccson, “Gastric MALT lymphoma: from aetiology to treatment,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Dammacco, D. Sansonno, C. Piccoli, V. Racanelli, F. P. D'Amore, and G. Lauletta, “The lymphoid system in hepatitis C virus infection: autoimmunity, mixed cryoglobulinemia, and overt B-cell malignancy,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 143–157, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Montella, A. Crispo, F. Frigeri et al., “HCV and tumors correlated with immune system: a case-control study in an area of hyperendemicity,” Leukemia Research, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 775–781, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. De Falco, A. Lucariello, S. Iaquinto, V. Esposito, G. Guerra, and A. De Luca, “Molecular mechanisms of Helicobacter pylori pathogenesis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 230, no. 8, pp. 1702–1707, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. E. Levy and J. E. Darnell Jr., “STATs: transcriptional control and biological impact,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 651–662, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Frede, U. Berchner-Pfannschmidt, and J. Fandrey, “Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors during inflammation,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 435, pp. 403–419, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Flamant, S. Toffoli, M. Raes, and C. Michiels, “Hypoxia regulates inflammatory gene expression in endothelial cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 315, no. 5, pp. 733–747, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. A. Gerber and J. S. Pober, “IFN-α induces transcription of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α to inhibit proliferation of human endothelial cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 1052–1062, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. H. Wenger, D. P. Stiehl, and G. Camenisch, “Integration of oxygen signaling at the consensus HRE.,” Science's STKE, vol. 306, article re12, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  43. D. Kamato, M. L. Burch, T. J. Piva et al., “Transforming growth factor-β signalling: role and consequences of Smad linker region phosphorylation,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2017–2024, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. Conte, E. Riant, C. Toutain et al., “FGF2 translationally induced by hypoxia is involved in negative and positive feedback loops with HIF-1α,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 8, Article ID e3078, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. R. Stark and J. E. Darnell Jr., “The JAK-STAT pathway at twenty,” Immunity, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 503–514, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. F. Marzo, A. Lavorgna, G. Coluzzi et al., “Erythropoietin in heart and vessels: focus on transcription and signalling pathways,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 183–187, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. A. Salzman, J. J. Mazza, and J. K. Burmester, “Regulation of colony-stimulating factor-induced human myelopoiesis by transforming growth factor-beta isoforms,” Cytokines, Cellular and Molecular Therapy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Zhang, X. Zhang, F. Xie et al., “The regulation of TGF-β/SMAD signaling by protein deubiquitination,” Protein & Cell, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 503–517, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. Vaidya, N. Gangat, T. Jimma et al., “Plasma cytokines in polycythemia vera: phenotypic correlates, prognostic relevance, and comparison with myelofibrosis,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 1003–1005, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. E. Pourcelot, C. Trocme, J. Mondet, S. Bailly, B. Toussaint, and P. Mossuz, “Cytokine profiles in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia patients: clinical implications,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 360–368, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Hermouet, I. Corre, and E. Lippert, “Interleukin-8 and other agonists of Gi2 proteins: autocrine paracrine growth factors for human hematopoietic progenitors acting in synergy with colony stimulating factors,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 39–48, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  52. S. Hermouet, A. Godard, D. Pineau et al., “Abnormal production of interleukin (IL)-11 and IL-8 in polycythaemia vera,” Cytokine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 178–183, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Boissinot, C. Cleyrat, M. Vilaine, Y. Jacques, I. Corre, and S. Hermouet, “Anti-inflammatory hepatocyte growth factor and interleukin-11 are overexpressed in Polycythemia Vera and contribute to the growth of mutated erythroblasts independently of JAK2V617F,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 990–1001, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  54. A. Tefferi, R. Vaidya, D. Caramazza, C. Finke, T. Lasho, and A. Pardanani, “Circulating interleukin (IL)-8, IL-2R, IL-12, and IL-15 levels are independently prognostic in primary myelofibrosis: a comprehensive cytokine profiling study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1356–1363, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Lymperi, F. Ferraro, and D. T. Scadden, “The HSC niche concept has turned 31. Has our knowledge matured?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1192, pp. 12–18, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M.-C. Le Bousse-Kerdilès, “Primary myelofibrosis and the ‘bad seeds in bad soil’ concept,” Fibrogenesis and Tissue Repair, vol. 5, supplement 1, article S20, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J.-J. Lataillade, O. Pierre-Louis, H. C. Hasselbalch et al., “Does primary myelofibrosis involve a defective stem cell niche? From concept to evidence,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 3026–3035, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. I. Corre-Buscail, D. Pineau, M. Boissinot, and S. Hermouet, “Erythropoietin-independent erythroid colony formation by bone marrow progenitors exposed to interleukin-11 and interleukin-8,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1299–1308, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. A. G. Fleischman, K. J. Aichberger, S. B. Luty et al., “TNFα facilitates clonal expansion of JAK2V617F positive cells in myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 24, pp. 6392–6398, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. P. Mossuz, F. Girodon, M. Donnard et al., “Diagnostic value of serum erythropoietin level in patients with absolute erythrocytosis,” Haematologica, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 1194–1279, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  61. L. F. Mager, C. Riether, C. M. Schürch et al., “IL-33 signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 2579–2591, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. Y. Kristinsson, O. Landgren, J. Samuelsson, M. Björkholm, and L. R. Goldin, “Autoimmunity and the risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Haematologica, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1216–1220, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. C. Le Bousse-Kerdilès and M. C. Martyré, “Dual implication of fibrogenic cytokines in the pathogenesis of fibrosis and myeloproliferation in myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 437–444, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. T. Barbui, A. Carobbio, G. Finazzi et al., “Inflammation and thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: different role of C-reactive protein and pentraxin 3,” Haematologica, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 315–318, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. T. Barbui, A. Carobbio, G. Finazzi et al., “Elevated C-reactive protein is associated with shortened leukemia-free survival in patients with myelofibrosis,” Leukemia, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2084–2086, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Risum, A. Madelung, H. Bondo et al., “The JAK2V617F allele burden and STAT3- and STAT5 phosphorylation in myeloproliferative neoplasms: early prefibrotic myelofibrosis compared with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis,” Acta Pathologica Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandivinia, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 498–504, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  67. T.-S. Lee, H. Kantarjian, W. Ma, C.-H. Yeh, F. Giles, and M. Albitar, “Effects of clinically relevant MPL mutations in the transmembrane domain revealed at the atomic level through computational modeling,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 8, Article ID e23396, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. I. S. Hitchcock and K. Kaushansky, “Thrombopoietin from beginning to end,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 259–268, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. A. Hirao, “TPO signal for stem cell genomic integrity,” Blood, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 459–460, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. A. Pardanani, T. Lasho, C. Finke, S. T. Oh, J. Gotlib, and A. Tefferi, “LNK mutation studies in blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms, and in chronic-phase disease with TET2, IDH, JAK2 or MPL mutations,” Leukemia, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1713–1718, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. J. Dunbar, L. P. Gondek, C. L. O'Keefe et al., “250K single nucleotide polymorphism array karyotyping identifies acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous mutations, including novel missense substitutions of c-Cbl, in myeloid malignancies,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 24, pp. 10349–10357, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. Sanada, T. Suzuki, L.-Y. Shih et al., “Gain-of-function of mutated C-CBL tumour suppressor in myeloid neoplasms,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7257, pp. 904–908, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. F. H. Grand, C. E. Hidalgo-Curtis, T. Ernst et al., “Frequent CBL mutations associated with 11q acquired uniparental disomy in myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 24, pp. 6182–6192, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. Bersenev, C. Wu, J. Balcerek et al., “Lnk constrains myeloproliferative diseases in mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 2058–2069, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. F. Delhommeau, S. Dupont, V. Della Valle et al., “Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 22, pp. 2289–2301, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. N. Carbuccia, A. Murati, V. Trouplin et al., “Mutations of ASXL1 gene in myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Leukemia, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 2183–2186, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. E. R. Mardis, L. Ding, D. J. Dooling et al., “Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 11, pp. 1058–1066, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. T. Ernst, A. J. Chase, J. Score et al., “Inactivating mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myeloid disorders,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 722–726, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. M. E. Figueroa, O. Abdel-Wahab, C. Lu et al., “Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation,” Cancer Cell, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 553–567, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. Tahiliani, K. P. Koh, Y. Shen et al., “Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1,” Science, vol. 324, no. 5929, pp. 930–935, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. Ito, A. C. Dalessio, O. V. Taranova, K. Hong, L. C. Sowers, and Y. Zhang, “Role of tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification,” Nature, vol. 466, no. 7310, pp. 1129–1133, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A. D. Viny and R. L. Levine, “Genetics of myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Cancer Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. G. W. Reuther, “Recurring mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms alter epigenetic regulation of gene expression,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 752–762, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  84. M. Kleppe, M. Kwak, P. Koppikar et al., “JAK-STAT pathway activation in malignant and nonmalignant cells contributes to MPN pathogenesis and therapeutic response,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 316–331, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. G. Hoermann, S. Cerny-Reiterer, H. Herrmann et al., “Identification of oncostatin M as a JAK2 V617F-dependent amplifier of cytokine production and bone marrow remodeling in myeloproliferative neoplasms,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 894–906, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C.-C. Duo, F.-Y. Gong, X.-Y. He et al., “Soluble calreticulin induces tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-6 production by macrophages through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and NFκB signaling pathways,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 2916–2928, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. Tefferi, T. L. Lasho, O. Abdel-Wahab et al., “IDH1 and IDH2 mutation studies in 1473 patients with chronic-, fibrotic- or blast-phase essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera or myelofibrosis,” Leukemia, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1302–1309, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. A. M. Vannucchi, T. L. Lasho, P. Guglielmelli P et al., “TET2 and IDH1 mutations and poor prognosis in primary myelofibrosis,” Leukemia, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1861–1869, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  89. D. Inoue, J. Kitaura, H. Matsui et al., “SETBP1 mutations drive leukemic transformation in ASXL1-mutated MDS,” Leukemia, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. D. Olcaydu, A. Harutyunyan, R. Jäger et al., “A common JAK2 haplotype confers susceptibility to myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 450–454, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. A. V. Jones, A. Chase, R. T. Silver et al., “JAK2 haplotype is a major risk factor for the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 446–449, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. O. Kilpivaara, S. Mukherjee, A. M. Schram et al., “A germline JAK2 SNP is associated with predisposition to the development of JAK2V617F-positive myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 455–459, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. R. Jäger, A. S. Harutyunyan, E. Rumi et al., “Common germline variation at the TERT locus contributes to familial clustering of myeloproliferative neoplasms,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 1107–1110, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. W. Tapper, A. V. Jones, R. Kralovics et al., “Genetic variation at MECOM, TERT, JAK2 and HBS1L-MYB predisposes to myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, p. 6691, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. S. Nahajevszky, H. Andrikovics, A. Batai et al., “The prognostic impact of germline 46/1 haplotype of Janus Kinase 2 in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia,” Haematologica, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1613–1618, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. S. Hermouet and M. Vilaine, “The JAK2 46/1 haplotype: a marker of inappropriate myelomonocytic response to cytokine stimulation, leading to increased risk of inflammation, myeloid neoplasm, and impaired defense against infection?” Haematologica, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1575–1579, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. M. Braig, N. Pällmann, M. Preukschas, and et al, “A ‘telomere-associated secretory phenotype’ cooperates with BCR-ABL to drive malignant proliferation of leukemic cells,” Leukemia, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2028–2039, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. R. Sood, A. Talwar-Trikha, S. R. Chakrabarti, and G. Nucifora, “MDS1/EVI1 enhances TGF-beta1 signaling and strengthens its growth-inhibitory effect but the leukemia-associated fusion protein AML1/MDS1/EVI1, product of the t(3;21), abrogates growth-inhibition in response to TGF-beta1,” Leukemia, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 348–357, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  99. K. Yasui, C. Konishi, Y. Gen et al., “EVI1, a target gene for amplification at 3q26, antagonizes transforming growth factor-β-mediated growth inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Science, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 929–937, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. R. Saxena, “Th1/Th2 cytokines and their genotypes as predictors of hepatitis B virus related hepatocellular carcinoma,” World Journal of Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1572–1580, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. C. Ding, X. Ji, X. Chen, Y. Xu, and L. Zhong, “TNF-α gene promoter polymorphisms contribute to periodontitis susceptibility: evidence from 46 studies,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 748–759, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. L. Alvarez-Rodriguez, M. Lopez-Hoyos, E. Carrasco-Marín et al., “Cytokine gene considerations in giant cell arteritis: IL10 promoter polymorphisms and a review of the literature,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. B. J. Światek, “Is interleukin-10 gene polymorphism a predictive marker in HCV infection?” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 47–59, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. N. Wang, R. Zhou, C. Wang et al., “−251 T/A polymorphism of the interleukin-8 gene and cancer risk: a HuGE review and meta-analysis based on 42 case-control studies,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2831–2841, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. A. Suárez, P. Lpez, and C. Gutiérrez, “IL-10 and TNFα genotypes in SLE,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2010, Article ID 838390, 11 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. L.-B. Gao, X.-M. Pan, J. Jia et al., “IL-8 -251A/T polymorphism is associated with decreased cancer risk among population-based studies: Evidence from a meta-analysis,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1333–1343, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. C. M. Eklund, “Proinflammatory cytokines in CRP baseline regulation,” Advances in Clinical Chemistry, vol. 48, pp. 111–136, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. G. H. Tesch, “MCP-1/CCL2: a new diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for progressive renal injury in diabetic nephropathy,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 294, no. 4, pp. F697–F701, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. J. C. Aguillón, A. Cruzat, O. Aravena, L. Salazar, C. Llanos, and M. Cuchacovich, “Could single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affecting the tumour necrosis factor promoter be considered as part of rheumatoid arthritis evolution?” Immunobiology, vol. 211, no. 1-2, pp. 75–84, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. F. Stüber, S. Klaschik, L. E. Lehmann, J.-C. Schewe, S. Weber, and M. Book, “Cytokine promoter polymorphisms in severe sepsis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 41, supplement 7, pp. S416–S420, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. J. C. Aguillón G, A. Cruzat C, J. Cuenca M, and M. Cuchacovich T, “Tumor necrosis factor alpha genetic polymorphism as a risk factor in disease,” Revista Medica de Chile, vol. 130, no. 9, pp. 1043–1050, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  112. L. Giannitrapani, M. Soresi, D. Balasus, A. Licata, and G. Montalto, “Genetic association of interleukin-6 polymorphism (-174 G/C) with chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 2449–2455, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. N. S. Grotenboer, M. E. Ketelaar, G. H. Koppelman, and M. C. Nawijn, “Decoding asthma: translating genetic variation in IL33 and IL1RL1 into disease pathophysiology,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 856–865, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. L. Akhabir and A. Sandford, “Genetics of interleukin 1 receptor-like 1 in immune and inflammatory diseases,” Current Genomics, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 591–606, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. S. Takiuchi, T. Mannami, T. Miyata et al., “Identification of 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms in human hepatocyte growth factor gene and association with blood pressure and carotid atherosclerosis in the Japanese population,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 301–307, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. A. Koutras, V. Kotoula, and G. Fountzilas, “Prognostic and predictive role of vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms in breast cancer,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 79–94, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. P. D. Ziakas, P. Karsaliakos, M. L. Prodromou, and E. Mylonakis, “Interleukin-6 polymorphisms and hematologic malignancy: a re-appraisal of evidence from genetic association studies,” Biomarkers, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 625–631, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. N. Joshi, S. Kannan, N. Kotian, S. Bhat, M. Kale, and S. Hake, “Interleukin 6 -174G>C polymorphism and cancer risk: meta-analysis reveals a site dependent differential influence in Ancestral North Indians,” Human Immunology, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 901–908, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. M. Boissinot, M. Vilaine, and S. Hermouet, “The Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)/met axis: a neglected target in the treatment of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms?” Cancers, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1631–1669, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. H. C. Hasselbalch, “Chronic inflammation as a promotor of mutagenesis in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis. A human inflammation model for cancer development?” Leukemia Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 214–220, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. H. Frederiksen, D. K. Farkas, C. F. Christiansen, H. C. Hasselbalch, and H. T. Sørensen, “Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms and subsequent cancer risk: a Danish population-based cohort study,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 25, pp. 6515–6520, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. K. Schonberg, J. Rudolph, M. Vonnahme et al., “JAK inhibition impairs NK cell function in myeloproliferative neoplasms,” Cancer Research, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 2187–2199, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. A. Tedeschi, C. Baratè, E. Minola, and E. Morra, “Cryoglobulinemia,” Blood Reviews, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 183–200, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. S. Hermouet, I. Corre, M. Gassin et al., “Hepatitis C virus human herpesvirus 8 and the development of plasma cell leukemia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 2, pp. 178–179, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  125. E. Bigot-Corbel, M. Gassin, I. Corre, D. L. Carrer, O. Delaroche, and S. Hermouet, “Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, monoclonal immunoglobulin specific for HCV core protein, and plasma-cell malignancy,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 4357–4358, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. D. Feron, C. Charlier, V. Gourain et al., “Chronic viral infection, virus-specific monoclonal immunoglobulin, and development of plasma cell malignancy,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 21, pp. 1240–1241, 2011, abstract 38923. View at: Google Scholar
  127. D. Feron, C. Charlier, V. Gourain et al., “Multiplexed infectious protein microarray immunoassay suitable for the study of the specificity of monoclonal immunoglobulins,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 433, no. 2, pp. 202–209, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. S. Panfilio, P. D'Urso, G. Annechini et al., “Regression of a case of multiple myeloma with antiviral treatment in a patient with chronic HCV infection,” Leukemia Research Reports, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–40, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. J. Grisouard, T. Shimizu, A. Duek et al., “Deletion of Stat3 in hematopoietic cells enhances thrombocytosis and shortens survival in a JAK2-V617F mouse model of MPN,” Blood, vol. 125, no. 13, pp. 2131–2140, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. B. J. Jenkins, A. W. Roberts, M. Najdovska, D. Grail, and M. Ernst, “The threshold of gp130-dependent STAT3 signaling is critical for normal regulation of hematopoiesis,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 3512–3520, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. B. J. Jenkins, A. W. Roberts, C. J. Greenhill et al., “Pathologic consequences of STAT3 hyperactivation by IL-6 and IL-11 during hematopoiesis and lymphopoiesis,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 2380–2388, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. P. Coppo, I. Dusanter-Fourt, W. Vainchenker, and A. G. Turhan, “BCR-ABL induces opposite phenotypes in murine ES cells according to STAT3 activation levels,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. O. Fuchs, “Transcription factor NF-κB inhibitors as single therapeutic agents or in combination with classical chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of hematologic malignancies,” Current Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 98–122, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. Z. Lu, Y. Jin, C. Chen, J. Li, Q. Cao, and J. Pan, “Pristimerin induces apoptosis in imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells harboring T315I mutation by blocking NF-κB signaling and depleting Bcr-Abl,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 9, article 112, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. S. Heavey, P. Godwin, A.-M. Baird et al., “Strategic targeting of the PI3K-NFκB axis in cisplatin-resistant NSCLC,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1367–1377, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. E. Monti and M. B. Gariboldi, “HIF-1 as a target for cancer chemotherapy, chemo-sensitisation and chemoprevention,” Current Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 62–77, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  137. Y. Xia, H.-K. Choi, and K. Lee, “Recent advances in hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 inhibitors,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 49, pp. 24–40, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. G. N. Masoud, J. Wang, J. Chen, D. Miller, and W. Li, “Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel HIF1α Inhibitors,” Anticancer Research, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 3849–3859, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  139. G. Barosi, E. Gattoni, P. Guglielmelli et al., “Phase I/II study of single-agent bortezomib for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis. Clinical and biological effects of proteasome inhibition,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 616–619, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. M. J. Aman, G. Bug, W. E. Aulitzky, C. Huber, and C. Peschel, “Inhibition of interleukin-11 by interferon-α in human bone marrow stromal cells,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 863–867, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  141. S. Radaeva, B. Jaruga, F. Hong et al., “Interferon-α activates multiple STAT signals and down-regulates c-Met in primary human hepatocytes,” Gastroenterology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 1020–1034, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. G. A. Kennedy, A. Varelias, S. Vuckovic et al., “Addition of interleukin-6 inhibition with tocilizumab to standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: a phase 1/2 trial,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1451–1459, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. X.-S. Qi, X.-Z. Guo, G.-H. Han, H.-Y. Li, and J. Chen, “MET inhibitors for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a review,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 18, pp. 5445–5453, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. D. L. Scott, F. Ibrahim, F. Farewell et al., “Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus combination intensive therapy with conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in established rheumatoid arthritis: TACIT non-inferiority randomised controlled trial,” British Medical Journal, vol. 350, Article ID h1046, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. G. Bianchi and N. C. Munshi, “Pathogenesis beyond the cancer clone(s) in multiple myeloma,” Blood, vol. 125, no. 20, pp. 3049–3058, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. V. E. Manzo and A. S. Bhatt, “The human microbiome in hematopoiesis and hematologic disorders,” Blood, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 311–318, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. G. J. Xu, T. Kula, Q. Xu et al., “Viral immunology. Comprehensive serological profiling of human populations using a synthetic human virome,” Science, vol. 348, no. 6239, Article ID aaa0698, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  148. B. L. Esplin, T. Shimazu, R. S. Welner et al., “Chronic exposure to a TLR ligand injures hematopoietic stem cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 9, pp. 5367–5375, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Sylvie Hermouet et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.