Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Immunometabolism: Molecular Mechanisms, Diseases, and Therapies 2016

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 7141430 |

Sanja Novak, Ines Drenjancevic, Rosemary Vukovic, Zoltán Kellermayer, Anita Cosic, Maja Tolusic Levak, Péter Balogh, Filip Culo, Martina Mihalj, "Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygenation during DSS-Induced Colitis in BALB/c Mice Include Changes in Gene Expression of HIF-1α, Proinflammatory Cytokines, and Antioxidative Enzymes", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2016, Article ID 7141430, 19 pages, 2016.

Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygenation during DSS-Induced Colitis in BALB/c Mice Include Changes in Gene Expression of HIF-1α, Proinflammatory Cytokines, and Antioxidative Enzymes

Academic Editor: Fábio Santos Lira
Received25 Mar 2016
Revised08 Jul 2016
Accepted12 Jul 2016
Published30 Aug 2016


Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitrogen species have an indispensable role in regulating cell signalling pathways, including transcriptional control via hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). Hyperbaric oxygenation treatment (HBO2) increases tissue oxygen content and leads to enhanced ROS production. In the present study DSS-induced colitis has been employed in BALB/c mice as an experimental model of gut mucosa inflammation to investigate the effects of HBO2 on HIF-1α, antioxidative enzyme, and proinflammatory cytokine genes during the colonic inflammation. Here we report that HBO2 significantly reduces severity of DSS-induced colitis, as evidenced by the clinical features, histological assessment, impaired immune cell expansion and mobilization, and reversal of IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-6 gene expression. Gene expression and antioxidative enzyme activity were changed by the HBO2 and the inflammatory microenvironment in the gut mucosa. Strong correlation of HIF-1α mRNA level to GPx1, SOD1, and IL-6 mRNA expression suggests involvement of HIF-1α in transcriptional regulation of these genes during colonic inflammation and HBO2. This is further confirmed by a strong correlation of HIF-1α with known target genes VEGF and PGK1. Results demonstrate that HBO2 has an anti-inflammatory effect in DSS-induced colitis in mice, and this effect is at least partly dependent on expression of HIF-1α and antioxidative genes.

1. Introduction

Relapsing chronic inflammation found in the gut of individuals affected by inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is a result of several overlapping factors, including dysregulation of the immune response to the enteric microbiota, genetic susceptibility, and environmental factors [1, 2]. Reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species generated by inflammatory cells during an immune response create oxidative stress and are considered as important factors contributing to the pathogenesis of IBD. Lymphocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages activated during the gut inflammation produce high amounts of ROS/RNS destroying surrounding tissue [3]. Although oxidative stress is a major factor in the inflamed tissue leading towards necrosis, DNA damage, and carcinogenesis, certain amounts of ROS and other free radicals have an indispensable role in regulating different cell signalling pathways [4]. In addition, some immune cells, namely, the macrophages and neutrophils, use ROS to combat the microorganisms responsible for the infection.

Current therapies of IBD, including immunosuppressive drugs, antibiotics, and biological drugs, are efficient in controlling the course of the disease. However, for many affected individuals, conventional therapy becomes an inadequate choice for long-term treatment because of significant side effects and risk factors, such as increased cancer risk, development of tuberculosis, and heart failure [57]. In recent years, hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy has been introduced as a possible additional treatment for IBD patients, especially in the case of refractory disease when the standard therapy is ineffective.

HBO2 involves exposure to 100% oxygen under pressure greater than 1 atmosphere of absolute pressure (ATM). It is a well-established procedure frequently applied in the medical practice, especially effective in treating wounds of various aetiologies [811]. HBO2 increases blood and tissue oxygen saturation resulting also in enhanced production of ROS and RNS [12]. Previous studies have verified that the clinical efficacy of HBO2 derives from modulation of intracellular transduction cascades, leading to synthesis of growth factors which promote wound healing, neoangiogenesis, and ameliorates postischemic and postinflammatory injuries [13]. Additional investigations on the mechanism underlying HBO2-induced wound healing have revealed a central role of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) as transcriptional regulator of genes involved in angiogenesis, energy metabolism, and cell proliferation [9, 14, 15]. A further important function attributed to the HIF-1α is modulation of the immune responses, including the helper T-cell differentiation towards regulatory (Treg) versus Th17 phenotype [16, 17] and its strong anti-inflammatory activity in the gastrointestinal mucosa and hypoxic epithelium as a result of the transactivation of specific genes encoding for barrier-protective elements such as mucins [1820].

Hypoxia and ROS/RNS can induce stabilization of HIF-1α leading to the activation of the hypoxia signal transduction pathway [21]. Increased oxidative stress in the gut mucosa has been verified in humans suffering from ulcerative colitis [22, 23], as well as in experimentally induced colitis in animals [24, 25]. A recent study revealed increased activity of antioxidative enzymes and reduced oxidative stress in the inflamed gut mucosa following HBO2 exposure [24]; however, specific mechanisms inducing activation of antioxidative enzymes in the inflamed colonic tissue upon HBO2 remain unknown.

Since there is evidence that the intracellular redox status is in a close correlation with the inflammatory microenvironment, and it can also be changed by HBO2, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of HBO2 on the mRNA expression of HIF-1α, proinflammatory cytokines, and antioxidative enzymes in the gut and peripheral lymphoid organs of BALB/c mice with DSS-induced colitis. An additional aim was to assess the activity of antioxidative enzymes and whether HIF-1α gene expression regulation during the gut inflammation and HBO2 treatment correlates with the changes in antioxidative and proinflammatory gene expression. Our findings reveal that HBO2 treatment may effectively modulate the intestinal milieu in inflammatory conditions involving HIF-1α-mediated regulation of antioxidative gene expression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

BALB/c mice, obtained from Charles River (Calco, Italy), were bred at the animal facility of the Medical Faculty Osijek (Croatia). Mice were provided with standard rodent chow (Mucedola, Settimo Milanese, Italy) and water ad libitum. The experimental facility was maintained at C, humidity, and 12-hour light/dark cycle. All procedures involving live animals were conducted in accordance with the European Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (directive 86/609/EEC) and were approved by the local Ethical Committee (Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek) and Croatian Ministry of Agriculture.

2.2. Experimental Design

For each experiment male mice at the age of 10–12 weeks were randomized into 4 groups (-5 mice/group/experiment): control mice (CTRL), control mice undergoing HBO2 (CTRL + HBO2), mice receiving dextran sodium sulphate (DSS), and DSS treated mice undergoing HBO2 (DSS + HBO2). The average body weight of the mice at the time of inclusion into the study was  g. Colitis was induced by 5% (w/v) of DSS (Mr 36.000–50.000, MP Biomedicals, Illkrich, France) in drinking water ad libitum for 7 consecutive days [26, 27]. The HBO2 treatment was initiated at day 1 and was administered twice a day, 12 hours apart, until the end of experiment (the last session was applied in the morning of day 8; 15 sessions in total). During one HBO2 session, mice were exposed to 100% O2 for 60 minutes at 2.4 bars with addition of 15 minutes for gradual compression and decompression. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation on day 8, after the morning HBO2 session. Disease activity index (DAI) was assessed by daily measurement and scoring of animal body weight loss, stool consistency, and the presence of occult or gross blood per rectum. Measurements were performed at the same time each day until the end of experiment (day 8). DAI was determined as a sum of body weight loss score (0, none; 1, 1–5% loss; 2, 5–10%; 3, 10–15%; 4, >15%), stool consistency score (0, normal; 2, loose stool; 4, diarrhea), and score of occult/gross bleeding (0, normal; 2, occult bleeding; 4, gross hematochezia). Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation on day 8 following the last morning HBO2 treatment. Colons, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), and spleens were collected for further analysis. Colon length was determined for each animal.

2.3. Histological Assessment of Colitis

Colonic tissue was removed immediately after the animals were sacrificed, washed in PBS, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After 72 hours fixed tissue was embedded in paraffin and cut into a series of 6 μm thick sections. Slides were dried, deparaffinised, rehydrated, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Histological disease activity was assessed by an experienced histologist, blinded for clinical information. Histological evaluation was preformed according to modified Geboes score as follows [28]:

Grade 0 (structural (architectural changes)):0: no abnormality,1: mild abnormality,2: mild or moderate diffuse or multifocal abnormalities,3: severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities.

Grade 1 (chronic inflammatory infiltrate):0: no increase,1: mild but unequivocal increase,2: moderate increase,3: marked increase.

Grade 2 (lamina propria leukocytes):0: no increase,1: mild but unequivocal increase,2: moderate increase,3: marked increase.

Grade 3 (intraepithelial neutrophils):0: none,1: <5% crypts involved,2: <50% crypts involved,3: >50% crypts involved.

Grade 4 (crypt destruction):0: none,1: probable, local excess of neutrophils in part of crypt,2: probable, marked attenuation.

Grade 0 (structural (architectural changes)):3: unequivocal crypt destruction.

Grade 5 (erosion or ulceration):0: no erosion, ulceration, or granulation tissue,1: recovering epithelium + adjacent inflammation,2: probable erosion focally stripped,3: unequivocal erosion,4: ulcer or granulation tissue.Slides were analysed using light microscopy at magnifications 40x, 100x, 200x, and 400x and photographed at 200x (Olympus® BX50 microscope, Olympus C-5050 digital camera, and QuickPHOTO PRO imaging software (Promicra s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic)).

2.4. Isolation of Lamina Propria Lymphocytes

After isolation, the colon was cleaned of intestinal content and freed of fat tissue, washed in DMEM (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), cut into 5 cm long pieces, and, while shaken at 100 rpm, incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes in DMEM with 25 mM EDTA. The tissue was then thoroughly washed in PBS buffer for at least 5 times, cut into 2 mm long strips, and digested in DMEM containing 5 U/mL DNase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and collagenase II (Gibco, Paisley, UK) at 37°C for 20 min. Following this, supernatant was removed, and the previous step was repeated until complete digestion of the tissue was achieved. The supernatant was then filtered through a 100 μm sized filter; DMEM + 2% FBS (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was added and centrifuged at 800 ×g for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were resuspended in 5 mL of 40% Percoll (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, UK), overlaid on 4 mL of 80% Percoll, and centrifuged at 900 ×g/20 min/4°C. Lymphocytes from the interphase were collected and analysed by flow cytometry.

2.5. Flow Cytometry

Lymphocytes were isolated from the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and spleen by teasing apart the organs between the frosted ends of two microscopic slides. The cells were incubated with a mixture of PE anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, ExBio antibodies), FITC anti-B220 (clone RA3-6B2, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and conjugated with FITC using standard procedures), and APC anti-CD3 antibodies (clone 145-2C11, ExBio antibodies) and the other panel with PerCP anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, BD Biosciences), FITC anti-Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, BD Biosciences), and PE anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, StemCell Technologies Inc.) or PE anti-CD4 (clone MEM-241, ExBio antibodies) and PerCP anti-CD8 (clone MEM-31, ExBio antibodies) antibodies. Dead cells were excluded based on 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) (Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) staining. At least 20,000 live cells were collected by a BD FACS Canto II cytometer (FACS Canto II, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analysed using the FlowLogic software (Inivai Technologies, Mentone, Australia).

2.6. Measurement of Intracellular ROS Level

To assess hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and peroxynitrite (ONOO) level, 106 lymphocytes isolated from MLN and spleens were incubated for 30 min on +4°C with 10 μM dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) (Biomol, Hamburg, Germany), washed for 5 min at 400 ×g on +4°C, and analysed with the FACS Canto II. Following this, cells were stimulated with 100 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany), incubated for 30 min, and analysed for the second time. At each measurement minimum of 10,000 target cells were analysed. Data are expressed as the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) s.e.m.

2.7. Real-Time PCR

Colon, MLN, and spleen samples were isolated, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C till analysis. Total RNA was extracted using ONE STEP RNA Reagent (BIO BASIC Inc., Markham, Ontario, Canada) according to manufacturer’s protocol. RNA purity and concentration was assessed by NanoPhotometer® P-Class P330-30 (Implen, Munich, Germany). In order to purify RNA from all polysaccharides, including DSS, an additional purification step using 8 M LiCl was performed [29], followed by the standard genomic DNA purification step using Deoxyribonuclease I kit (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). One microgram of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis by High Capacity cDNA kit with RNase Inhibitor (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Real-time PCR was performed on CFX96 system (Bio Rad, Singapore) to assess relative expression of catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), HIF-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-6. Gene expression was normalized to HPRT1 gene. Primers list is given in the supplementary data (Table 1). Except for the primers for IL-6 gene published by Jeong et al. [30], all other primers were custom made using Primer 3 software. Messenger RNA expression was determined using SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (Bio Rad, Singapore). Data are presented as mean s.e.m.

GeneSequencePCR product length/bpAnnealing temperature/°C









2.8. Antioxidative Enzymes Activity Measurement

Frozen tissue samples were homogenized with liquid nitrogen and weighed. Tissue powder was additionally homogenized in 100 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM EDTA (1 : 10, w/v) using Ultra turrax T10 homogenizer (IKA, Staufen, Germany) while kept on ice. Tissue homogenates were sonicated for 30 seconds on ice in three 10 seconds intervals and then centrifuged at 20,000 ×g for 15 minutes at 4°C. Supernatant was collected, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C till analysis. CAT, GPx, and SOD enzyme activities were determined using a Lambda 25 UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with UV WinLab 6.0 software package (Perkin Elmer for the Better, Massachusetts, USA).

Catalase (EC activity was estimated spectrophotometrically using H2O2 as a substrate [31]. The reaction mixture consisted of 10 mM H2O2 in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0. Changes in absorbance of the reaction mixture were measured at 240 nm during 2 minutes after the sample addition. One unit of activity corresponds to the loss of 1 μmol of H2O2 per minute. CAT activity was calculated using molar extinction coefficient ( mM cm−1) and expressed as U mg−1 protein.

To assess glutathione peroxidase (EC activity a modified method described by Wendel [32] using H2O2 as a substrate was employed. GPx activity was determined indirectly by measuring the rate of NADPH oxidation to NADP+, accompanied by a decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. The assay mixture consisted of 50 mM phosphate buffer with 0.4 mM EDTA and 1 mM sodium azide (pH 7.0), 0.12 mM NADPH, 3.2 units of GR, 1 mM glutathione, and 0.0007% (w/w) H2O2 in a total volume of 1.55 mL. One unit catalyses the oxidation by H2O2 of 1.0 μmole of reduced glutathione to oxidized glutathione per minute at pH 7.0 and 25°C. GPx activity was calculated using molar extinction coefficient for NADPH (ε = 6.220 mM cm−1) and expressed as U mg−1 protein.

Superoxide dismutase (EC activity was determined using cytochrome C (0.05 mM) as an inhibitory molecule in PBS buffer saline with 0.1 mM EDTA in system xanthine (1 mM)/xanthine oxidase (50 U) by Flohe method [33].

Total soluble protein concentration in protein extracts was determined by Bradford reagent (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) following manufacturer’s protocol and using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Normal distribution was assessed by the Shapiro Wilk test. Within groups differences were tested by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Holm-Sidak/Tukey or Dunn’s post hoc multiple comparison procedure, respectively (Sigma plot 11.0, SigmaStat Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). In some cases, the Student -test and Mann-Whitney U Statistic were used to compare the differences between the two groups in the case of normally distributed variables and variables that violated assumption of normality, respectively. Spearman’s correlations were calculated where appropriate (Sigma plot 11.0, SigmaStat Inc.). DAI results were analysed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test (GraphPad Prism 5.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all procedures. All data are presented as mean values standard error of mean (s.e.m.).

3. Results

3.1. HBO2 Ameliorates the Course of DSS-Induced Colitis

In order to determine the effects of HBO2 on the course of acute colitis, BALB/c mice were exposed to 5% DSS in the drinking water ad libitum and daily monitored for body weight, stool consistency, and occult/gross rectal bleeding to calculate DAI. In this study the DSS treatment induced substantial weight loss, rectal bleeding, loose stool, and colon shortening resulting in significantly higher DAI compared to the control (CTRL) group, starting from day 3 until the end of the experiment (; Figure 1(a)). Mice that received DSS and underwent HBO2 treatment (DSS + HBO2 group) also presented with significantly higher DAI compared to the CTRL group; however, in this group of mice HBO2 treatment significantly reduced DAI compared to the DSS mice, starting from day 5 throughout day 8 (days 5 and 8 ; days 6 and 7 ; Figure 1(a)). In addition, average colon length in the DSS group of mice was significantly shorter ( cm) compared to the CTRL group ( cm; ), while this effect was significantly ameliorated by HBO2 treatment in the DSS + HBO2 group ( cm) compared to the DSS group (, Figure 1(b)). DSS induced colitis resulted in significant body mass loss compared to CTRL group, irrespective of HBO2 treatment ( and in the DSS and DSS + HBO2 group, resp.; ). Mice undergoing HBO2 presented with reduced body mass loss. CTRL and CTRL + HBO2 gained body mass during the experiment, and , respectively.

Histological assessment of the colon revealed severe inflammation and ulceration extending into the deep portions of the mucosa with loss of crypts and with increased number of lamina propria leukocytes in DSS group of mice. We also found structural changes of mucosa in the colonic tissue of DSS + HBO2 mice but with reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells and decreased crypt distortion. When compared to the DSS + HBO2 group, the DSS group had significantly higher total histological score as well as individual scores (see modified Geboes score in Section 2.3, Figure 1(d), ), except for the intraepithelial neutrophil infiltration score ().

Distribution of inflammatory cells among the peripheral lymphoid organs, including Gr-1+ leukocytes (monocytes and neutrophils), F4/80+ leukocytes (monocytes), CD3+ T lymphocytes, and B220+ B lymphocytes (Figure 2), was assessed at the end of the experiment. In the MLN, frequencies of Gr-1+ cells did not differ among the experimental groups, while DSS induced a significant increase in F4/80+ and decrease in CD3+ cell frequencies ( and , resp.; Figure 2(b)). These findings in the DSS group were accompanied by a B-cell increase which was not statistically significant. HBO2 alone had no effect on the cell frequencies in MLN of control mice, whereas it substantially ameliorated these changes in mice with DSS-induced colitis (DSS + HBO2 group) but without reaching statistical significance.

In the spleen, Gr-1+ cell frequencies were significantly decreased in the DSS group compared to CTRL () and CTRL + HBO2 groups (; Figure 2(a)). HBO2 treatment reversed Gr-1+ cell frequencies to control values in the DSS + HBO2 group (; Figure 2(a)). In addition, the DSS mice showed reduced frequencies of B220+ lymphocytes compared to the CTRL group (), and HBO2 treatment abolished these effects in the DSS + HBO2 group (; Figure 2(c)). In addition, our study revealed that DSS-induced immune responses in the MLN and the spleen were significantly dampened by HBO2 treatment.

Frequency of CD4+ cells among the colon lamina propria lymphocytes of DSS and DSS + HBO2 groups was significantly increased compared to the CTRL group ( and , resp.), while the frequency of CD8+ cells was significantly increased only in the DSS group when compared to the CTRL group (; Figure 3).

3.2. Inflammation of Colonic Mucosa and HBO2 Treatment Induce Changes in Antioxidative Enzymes Gene Expression and HIF-1α Gene Regulation

Inflammatory conditions have been known to include the enhanced production of ROS and other oxidative mediators that may affect transcriptional regulation via HIF-1α. To investigate the role of HIF-1α in the regulation of the antioxidative response/capacity during DSS-induced colitis and HBO2 treatment, HIF-1α, CAT, GPx1, and SOD1 mRNA expressions were determined using quantitative PCR method. HIF-1α mRNA expression was significantly changed by the HBO2 treatment and the inflammatory microenvironment in the gut mucosa. DSS-induced colitis resulted in significant upregulation of HIF-1α gene in colonic mucosa ( for DSS group compared to CTRL), and the HBO2 treatment further increased HIF-1α mRNA expression in the DSS + HBO2 group ( compared to CTRL; Figure 3(a)). In addition, the activity of HIF-1α protein was indirectly confirmed by measuring mRNA expression of well-established HIF-1α target genes, VEGF and PGK1. Both genes showed strong positive correlation to the HIF-1α mRNA (Supplementary Figure ) (see Supplementary Material available online at There was also a tendency for upregulation of HIF-1α gene in MLN and spleens of the DSS group and its downregulation via HBO2 in the DSS + HBO2 group (Figure 4(a)); however, these changes did not reach statistical significance.

Inflammation during DSS-induced colitis and the HBO2 treatment also induced significant changes in mRNA expression of target antioxidative genes. DSS-treated mice presented with significant downregulation of the CAT gene in the colon compared to the CTRL group (), while there was a significant upregulation of CAT gene in the spleen of the DSS + HBO2 mice compared to the CTRL group (; Figure 4(b)). In the colon, GPx1 mRNA expression was increased in the DSS () and the DSS + HBO2 () group compared to CTRL group. The upregulation was even greater in mice with DSS-induced colitis that underwent the HBO2 treatment (DSS + HBO2 group; Figure 4(b)). SOD1 mRNA expression was significantly reduced in the colon of the DSS + HBO2 group compared to CTRL () and CTRL + HBO2 () groups. Similar changes in SOD1 gene expression were also found in the MLN of the DSS + HBO2 group ( compared to CTRL; Figure 4(b)). To summarize, colitis resulted in GPx1 gene upregulation and CAT gene downregulation, while HBO2 downregulated SOD1 and further upregulated GPx1 in a tissue-specific manner.

To examine the possible role of HIF-1α in transcriptional control of antioxidative genes in the colon, Spearman correlations were calculated. The results revealed a strong negative correlation between HIF-1α and SOD1 (, ) and a positive correlation of HIF-1α to the GPx1 gene (, ), while there was no significant correlation between the HIF-1α and the CAT gene in the colonic tissue (Figure 4(c)).

3.3. HBO2 Treatment Reduces Expression of Proinflammatory Genes Upregulated during DSS-Induced Colitis

The early phase of inflammation is mediated by several proinflammatory mediators, which prompted us to assess how HBO2 treatment affects their production. We found that gut mucosa inflammation was accompanied with a significant increase in IL-1β and IL-6 gene expression. In the case of IL-6 gene, this was significant for DSS and DSS + HBO2 groups compared to the CTRL + HBO2 group ( and , resp.; Figure 5(a)) in the colon. Furthermore, IL-6 gene was significantly upregulated in the MLN of the DSS group ( compared to CTRL), and HBO2 reduced its expression almost to control values in the DSS + HBO2 group ( compared to DSS; Figure 5(a)). IL-1β mRNA expression in the colonic mucosa was significantly increased during inflammation in DSS group compared to CTRL () and CTRL + HBO2 groups (). IL-1β mRNA levels in the colon of the DSS + HBO2 group did not significantly differ from the control groups, suggesting that HBO2 treatment blocked the increase of IL-1β gene expression in the inflamed mucosa.

IL-2 gene was significantly upregulated in the MLN of the DSS group compared to the CTRL group (), and HBO2 treatment resulted in its significant downregulation in the DSS + HBO2 group (). Similarly, IL-2 gene was significantly downregulated in the spleen of mice from the DSS + HBO2 group compared to the CTRL group (). In addition, there was a strong positive correlation between HIF-1α and IL-6 gene (, ; Figure 5(b)), while there was no correlation between HIF-1α and IL-1β or IL-2 genes in the colonic tissue (Figure 5(b)).

3.4. Colonic Inflammation and HBO2 Treatment Induce Changes in the Activity of Antioxidative Enzymes

In addition to their mRNA expression, we also tested the enzymatic activity of antioxidative enzymes. We found that both the inflammation and the HBO2 treatment per se were able to change the activity of antioxidative enzymes in the colonic mucosa and the peripheral lymphoid organs (MLN and spleen). In spleen HBO2 treatment per se induced significant increase of SOD activity ( compared to CTRL). Mice with DSS-induced colitis presented with significantly increased activity of SOD ( compared to CTRL) in the colon and reduced CAT activity in MLN and spleen ( and , resp.) compared to CTRL group. HBO2 treatment did not change SOD activity in the inflamed colonic mucosa, which was comparable to the levels found in DSS and CTRL + HBO2 groups (significantly increased compared to CTRL, ). On the other hand, HBO2 treatment significantly increased CAT () and GPx () activities in the spleens of the DSS + HBO2.

3.5. Lymphocyte H2O2 and Production Remains Unchanged during DSS-Induced Colitis and HBO2 Treatment

Immune cells at the site of inflammation and in the peripheral lymphoid organs are an important source of ROS [3]. Therefore we assessed the basal levels of intracellular H2O2 and ONOO and their production upon PMA-induced activation in the lymphocytes isolated from MLN and spleens of the mice from all experimental groups (Figure 6). Basal H2O2 and ONOO production in the MLN was not significantly different among the groups, except for the lymphocytes from the DSS + HBO2 group which presented with a significant increase of H2O2 and ONOO levels compared to the CTRL group (). PMA stimulation resulted in increased intracellular H2O2 and ONOO production, although statistically significant only for CTRL () and DSS + HBO2 () groups.

In the spleen, HBO2 increased lymphocyte H2O2 and ONOO production in CTRL + HBO2 and DSS + HBO2 groups ( and compared to the CTRL; and and compared to the DSS group). Their production after PMA-induced activation was decreased in all experimental groups except the CTRL group; however, this effect reached statistical significance only in the CTRL + HBO2 group ( compared to unstimulated lymphocytes).

4. Discussion

In the present study, the experimental model of DSS-induced colitis in BALB/c mice was employed to explore the effects of HBO2 on the antioxidative enzymes, transcription factor HIF-1α, and proinflammatory cytokine genes during colonic inflammation and their role in modulating the course of the disease via HBO2 treatment. The most important findings are that (a) HBO2 significantly reduces symptoms and severity of DSS-induced colitis, as evidenced by clinical appearance, contraction of the immune cell expansion and mobilization, and reversal of IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-6 gene expression; (b) HBO2 modulates the expression of antioxidative enzyme genes and enzyme activities during colitis; and (c) HBO2 enhances HIF-1α mRNA expression in the inflamed colonic tissue which is in a strong correlation with GPx1, SOD1, and IL-6 mRNA expression.

Several previous studies in animals and humans demonstrated the positive effects of HBO2 treatment in influencing the severity of colitis and reducing gut mucosa inflammation [27, 34]; however, data on the precise underlying mechanisms are scarce. Considerably more data on the beneficial anti-inflammatory effects of HBO2 are available for other conditions such as septic shock, ischemia/reperfusion injuries, and atherogenesis, where the previous studies reported reduced proinflammatory cytokine expression, suppressed development of Th cells, shrinking of spleen and lymph nodes, decreased responses to antigens, and reduced frequencies of circulating leukocytes [3542]. Although this is the first animal study investigating the effects of HBO2 performed on DSS-induced colitis in BALB/c mice and correlating it with the immune cell frequencies, our results are in line with previous findings on the changes associated with DSS-induced acute immune response, as well as on the effects of HBO2 on the antioxidative enzyme activities determined in other animal models, such as TNBS and acetic acid induced colitis in rats [27, 43, 44]. During colitis mice presented with decreased T and B cell frequencies in the spleen and reduced T cell frequencies in the MLN, suggesting that lymphocytes are recruited from the peripheral lymphoid organs and probably migrate to the inflamed colonic mucosa. One element of the beneficial effect of HBO2 may be linked to normalized T and B cells frequency in the MLN and spleen of mice with DSS-induced colitis after hyperbaric treatment (Figures 1 and 2). By measuring CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte in colon we confirm our hypothesis of T-cell recruitment from the peripheral lymphoid organs and their migration to the inflamed colonic mucosa, as well as immunomodulatory effect of HBO2. In our model HBO2 did not affect cell frequencies in the peripheral lymphoid organs of control mice, in contrast to previous findings where HBO2 treatment per se was able to change lymphocyte subset populations in the spleen [45]. The observed differences may be due to different oxygen tension applied in our study.

For a long time macrophages and neutrophils have been considered as immune cells exclusively producing proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and large amounts of ROS/RNS contributing to aggravated inflammation. We have found decreased spleen Gr-1+ cell frequencies during colitis and their normalization upon HBO2 treatment (Figure 2). In addition, we showed increased MLN frequencies of F4/80+ cells in DSS group, while HBO2 treatment reversed their frequencies almost to control values. These findings indicate that HBO2 can modulate distribution of phagocytes by retaining neutrophils in the spleen and instigating macrophage migration towards the site of inflammation, in agreement with previous findings describing inhibited neutrophil infiltration into the gut of mice with DSS-induced colitis [46]. Furthermore, HBO2 treatment alone did not change the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the colon, MLN, or spleen of the control mice; however, DSS-induced colitis resulted in a significant IL-1β and IL-6 gene upregulation in the colonic tissue and IL-2 gene upregulation in the MLN (Figure 5). Consistent with previous studies, HBO2 treatment abolished these effects, further confirming its anti-inflammatory potential [4749].

Several animal studies on the effects of HBO2 on the experimental colitis reported an increased antioxidative capacity and changes in antioxidative enzyme activity [24, 25]. It has been proposed that an optimal HBO2 treatment could generate ROS which would function primarily as intermediates in the antioxidative signalling pathways leading to increased expression of antioxidative enzymes, reduced inflammation, and ameliorated colitis symptoms but would not further damage the colonic tissue [50, 51]. Drenjancevic et al. showed that 24 hours after a two-hour HBO2 treatment at 2 bars in rats oxidative stress is not elevated, as evidenced by assessing ferric reducing antioxidant power ability of plasma (FRAP) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) level [12]. In addition, a recent study also suggests that ROS produced by NADPH oxidase complex are important mediators inducing anti-inflammatory response in autoimmune diseases [52]. Data on the CAT mRNA level during DSS-induced colitis and upon HBO2 treatment were not available prior to this study. We found that CAT mRNA expression is tissue and treatment specific (Figure 4). Colitis resulted in a significant downregulation of CAT mRNA expression in the colonic mucosa, and the HBO2 treatment induced its upregulation in the spleen of DSS + HBO2 group of mice. These results were largely in accordance with our finding on enzymatic catalase activity that was decreased in all measured tissues in the DSS group and reversed to control values in the spleen of DSS + HBO2 group (Table 2), as well as with a previous study demonstrating decreased catalase activity in colonic tissue upon DSS treatment [53]. This is also in line with a study on skin transplanted BALB/c mice where HBO2 treatment increased catalase, GPx, and SOD activity in the spleen [54]. Furthermore, upregulation of protein and mRNA catalase levels 14 days after HBO2 treatment, but not after 7 days, was also observed in the ulcer tissue of patients with diabetic foot, indicating a time-course for the effect of HBO2 to prevail [55].

Enzymatic activity (U mg−1 P)TissueCTRLCTRL + HBO2DSSDSS + HBO2




BALB/c mice at the age of 10–12 weeks were randomly assigned into 4 groups (/group): CTRL: control mice, CTRL + HBO2: control mice undergoing HBO2 (60 min/2.4 ATM, 2x/day, days 1–8), DSS: mice receiving DSS (5% w/v, days 1–7), and DSS + HBO2: DSS treated mice undergoing HBO2. Presented data (mean ± s.e.m.) are representative results from one experiment with min. five mice/group; was considered significant; statistically different from CTRL, ; #statistically different from DSS, ; statistically different from CTRL + HBO2, .

We found that GPx1 mRNA level was upregulated in the colon of DSS treated mice, irrespective of the HBO2 treatment, and there were no significant differences in the GPx1 mRNA expression in MLN and spleen. In contrast to our findings on mRNA expression, colon GPx enzyme activity was slightly reduced in DSS + HBO2 group compared to other groups, which is consistent with previous results obtained in acetic acid induced colitis in rats receiving combined HBO2 and ozone treatment [56]. However, other reports indicate decreased GPx and SOD activity in the inflamed distal colon mucosa and the plasma of rats with acetic acid induced colitis, and HBO2 normalized GPx but not SOD activity in the colon [24]. The observed discrepancies in the results may be related to the differences in experimental models used among the studies. In addition, in our study HBO2 treatment induced enhanced GPx and SOD activity in the spleen of DSS mice which is in contrast to reduced SOD1 mRNA expression and might be explained by additional SOD2 and SOD3 function in regulation of antioxidative capacity. Although intracellular H2O2 and ONOO levels were slightly increased during inflammation and HBO2 treatment in the MLN and HBO2 per se increased its level in spleen, impaired lymphocyte function was not observed.

Intensive research on the beneficial wound healing effects of HBO2 revealed its capacity to induce neovascularization, reduce oedema, decrease leukocyte adhesion, stimulate fibroblast expansion, and inhibit bacterial growth [14, 57]. Some of these processes are transcriptionally regulated by HIF-1α, namely, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression [58], regulatory T lymphocyte differentiation [59], and preservation of epithelial thigh junction integrity [60]. In addition, previous studies employing conditional deletion of epithelial HIF-1α or pharmacologic activation of HIF-1α in a murine model of colitis demonstrated a protective role for HIF-1α in colitis [61]. It has also been shown that HIF-1 increases expression of barrier-protective genes (multidrug resistance gene-1, intestinal trefoil factor, CD73) [62], decreases TNFα mRNA expression [61], and enhances antimicrobial activity by transcribing beta-defensin 1 [63]. In the present study we found increased expression of HIF-1α gene in inflamed colonic tissue, and HBO2 further increased its level. In the peripheral lymphoid organs HIF-1α gene expression was changed (upregulated) by the inflammation while HBO2 treatment showed a tendency to reverse this increase. These data suggest involvement of different mechanisms controlling HIF-1α gene expression at the site of inflammation (colon) and the peripheral lymphoid organs (MLN and spleen), responsible for the initiation of the immune response and the T/B-cell expansion and differentiation, respectively. We also demonstrated a strong positive correlation between HIF-1α and GPx1 mRNA levels in the colon (Figure 4(b)). This is in line with in vitro studies where overexpressed HIF-1α in colorectal cancer cells resulted in enhanced GPx1 expression through TGF-βRI/Smad2/ERK1/2/HIF-1α signalling cascade, suggesting transcriptional regulation of GPx1 by HIF-1α [64].

In the present study we found strong negative correlation between HIF-1α and SOD1 mRNA expression. This is in accordance with a previous study showing that docosahexaenoic acid downregulates SOD1 gene transcription through an HRE-mediated mechanism (HRE, hypoxia-response element), involving HIF signalling in human cancer cells [65]; thus our results indicate similar mechanism involved in SOD1 control in the murine colon mucosa in vivo during colitis and HBO2.

Previous studies revealed that HIF-1α mediated transcriptional regulation of different proinflammatory cytokines and growth factor genes are tissue and cell specific and include regulation trough alternative splicing, mRNA stability, and interactions with other transcription factors like NF-κB [6669]. In our study we found a strong correlation between HIF-1α and IL-6 mRNA levels suggesting involvement of HIF-1α in transcriptional regulation of IL-6 gene during colonic inflammation and HBO2.

In conclusion, our results confirmed that HBO2 exerts an anti-inflammatory effect on DSS-induced colitis in mice, and this effect at least involves HIF-1α and antioxidative genes expression regulation (as outlined in Figure 7). However, further studies are necessary to identify the cells that may contribute to or are influenced by the effects upon HBO2 treatment.


DAI:Disease activity index
DCF DA:Dichlorofluorescein acetate
DSS:Dextran sodium sulfate
GPx1:Glutathione peroxidase 1
HBO2:Hyperbaric oxygen
HRE:Hypoxia-response element
HIF-1α:Hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha
IBD:Inflammatory bowel disease
MFI:Median fluorescence intensity
MLN:Mesenteric lymph node
:Superoxide radical
PMA:Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
RNS:Reactive nitrogen species
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
s.e.m.:Standard error mean
SOD1:Superoxide dismutase 1
TCR:T cell receptor
Treg:T regulatory lymphocyte
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Martina Mihalj and Sanja Novak conceived and designed the study. Sanja Novak, Martina Mihalj, Rosemary Vukovic, Zoltán Kellermayer, and Anita Cosic performed the experiments. Maja Tolusic Levak performed pathohistological evaluation and analysis and wrote the paper. Rosemary Vukovic, Sanja Novak, Martina Mihalj, Péter Balogh, and Ines Drenjancevic contributed to data analysis and interpretation. Sanja Novak wrote the first draft of the paper. Martina Mihalj, Péter Balogh, and Zoltán Kellermayer critically revised the paper, and all authors read and approved its final version.


This work was supported by the grant of the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports to ID (219-2160133-2034) and FC (219-0000000-0328) and the grant of Faculty of Medicine University of Osijek to MM (#VIF2015 -MEFOS-8). Authors thank Dr. Hrvoje Mihalj for language editing of the paper.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1: Relative mRNA expression of VEGF (A), and PGK1 gene (B) in colon and their correlation to the HIF-1α gene expression. Relative mRNA expression was determined by real-time PCR, and the measured genes were normalized to the HPRT1 gene expression. BALB/c mice at the age of 10–12 weeks were randomly assigned into 4 groups (n = 5/group/experiments) CTRL—control mice, CTRL+HBO2—control mice undergoing HBO2 (60 min/2.4 ATM, 2x/day, days 1–8), DSS—mice receiving dextran sodium sulphate (DSS, 5% w/v, days 1–7), and DSS+HBO2—DSS treated mice undergoing HBO2. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of two independent experiments, each with min. 5 mice/group. *statistically different from CTRL, P < 0.05; statistically different from CTRL+HBO2, P < 0.05.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. P. Goyette, G. Boucher, D. Mallon et al., “High-density mapping of the MHC identifies a shared role for HLA-DRB101:03 in inflammatory bowel diseases and heterozygous advantage in ulcerative colitis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 172–179, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Satsangi, M. S. Silverberg, S. Vermeire, and J.-F. Colombel, “The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications,” Gut, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 749–753, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. A. Risquesa, P. S. Rabinovitch, and T. A. Brentnall, “Cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease: new molecular approaches,” Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 382–390, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Nathan and A. Cunningham-Bussel, “Beyond oxidative stress: an immunologist's guide to reactive oxygen species,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 349–361, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. J. Lee, E. S. Jung, J. H. Lee et al., “Long-term clinical outcomes and factors predictive of relapse after 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis,” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 59, no. 117, pp. 1415–1420, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. J. Sandborn, B. G. Feagan, and G. R. Lichtenstein, “Medical management of mild to moderate Crohn's disease: evidence-based treatment algorithms for induction and maintenance of remission,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 987–1003, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. R. Sutherland, G. R. May, and E. A. Shaffer, “Sulfasalazine revisited: a meta-analysis of 5-aminosalicylic acid in the treatment of ulcerative colitis,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 540–549, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Eskes, H. Vermeulen, C. Lucas, and D. T. Ubbink, “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 12, Article ID CD008059, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. V. G. Sunkari, F. Lind, I. R. Botusan et al., “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy activates hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), which contributes to improved wound healing in diabetic mice,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. Tuk, M. Tong, E. M. G. Fijneman, and J. W. Van Neck, “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat diabetes impaired wound healing in rats,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e108533, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Ueno, T. Omi, E. Uchida, H. Yokota, and S. Kawana, “Evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds,” Journal of Nippon Medical School, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. Drenjancevic, A. Kibel, D. Kibel, V. Seric, and A. Cosic, “Blood pressure, acid-base and blood gas status and indicators of oxidative stress in healthy male rats exposed to acute hyperbaric oxygenation,” Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 319–328, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. E. M. Camporesi and G. Bosco, “Mechanisms of action of hyperbaric oxygen therapy,” Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. R. Thom, “Oxidative stress is fundamental to hyperbaric oxygen therapy,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 988–995, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. E. Ziello, I. S. Jovin, and Y. Huang, “Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1 regulatory pathway and its potential for therapeutic intervention in malignancy and ischemia,” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  16. E. T. Clambey, E. N. McNamee, J. A. Westrich et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha-dependent induction of FoxP3 drives regulatory T-cell abundance and function during inflammatory hypoxia of the mucosa,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 41, pp. E2784–E2793, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Yao, C. Wei, J.-Y. Wang, R. Zhang, Y.-X. Li, and L.-S. Wang, “Effect of resveratrol on Treg/Th17 signaling and ulcerative colitis treatment in mice,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 6572–6581, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. M. Comerford, T. J. Wallace, J. Karhausen, N. A. Louis, M. C. Montalto, and S. P. Colgan, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent regulation of the multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 3387–3394, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  19. G. T. Furuta, J. R. Turner, C. T. Taylor et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent induction of intestinal trefoil factor protects barrier function during hypoxia,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 193, no. 9, pp. 1027–1034, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. A. Louis, K. E. Hamilton, G. Canny, L. L. Shekels, S. B. Ho, and S. P. Colgan, “Selective induction of mucin-3 by hypoxia in intestinal epithelia,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 1616–1627, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. N. S. Chandel, D. S. McClintock, C. E. Feliciano et al., “Reactive oxygen species generated at mitochondrial Complex III stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor-1α during hypoxia: a mechanism of O2 sensing,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 33, pp. 25130–25138, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Lih-Brody, S. R. Powell, K. P. Collier et al., “Increased oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant defenses in mucosa of inflammatory bowel disease,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2078–2086, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. Ramonaite, J. Skieceviciene, G. Kiudelis et al., “Influence of NADPH oxidase on inflammatory response in primary intestinal epithelial cells in patients with ulcerative colitis,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 13, article 159, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Gulec, M. Yasar, S. Yildiz et al., “Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on experimental acute distal colitis,” Physiological Research, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 493–499, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  25. E. Koçak, S. Köklü, E. Akbal et al., “NaOH-induced Crohn's colitis in rats: a novel experimental model,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2833–2837, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. I. Okayasu, S. Hatakeyama, M. Yamada, T. Ohkusa, Y. Inagaki, and R. Nakaya, “A novel method in the induction of reliable experimental acute and chronic ulcerative colitis in mice,” Gastroenterology, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 694–702, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  27. D. A. Rossignol, “Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and analysis,” Medical Gas Research, vol. 2, no. 1, article 6, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. Bessissow, B. Lemmens, M. Ferrante et al., “Prognostic value of serologic and histologic markers on clinical relapse in ulcerative colitis patients with mucosal healing,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 1684–1692, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. Viennois, F. Chen, H. Laroui, M. T. Baker, and D. Merlin, “Dextran sodium sulfate inhibits the activities of both polymerase and reverse transcriptase: lithium chloride purification, a rapid and efficient technique to purify RNA,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 6, no. 1, article 360, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. B. Jeong, Y. K. Shin, and S.-H. Lee, “Anti-inflammatory activity of patchouli alcohol in RAW264.7 and HT-29 cells,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 55, pp. 229–233, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. Aebi, “Catalase in vitro,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 105, pp. 121–126, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Wendel, “Glutathione peroxidase,” in Enzymatic Basis of Detoxication, W. B. Jakoby, Ed., chapter 16, pp. 333–353, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Flohe and F. Otting, “Superoxide dismutase assays,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 105, pp. 93–104, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. S. Dulai, M. W. Gleeson, D. Taylor, S. D. Holubar, J. C. Buckey, and C. A. Siegel, “Systematic review: the safety and efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for inflammatory bowel disease,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1266–1275, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M.-F. Chen, H.-M. Chen, S. W. N. Ueng, and M.-H. Shyr, “Hyperbaric oxygen pretreatment attenuates hepatic reperfusion injury,” Liver, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 110–116, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  36. C. Luongo, F. Imperatore, S. Cuzzocrea et al., “Effects of hyperbaric oxygen exposure on a zymosan-induced shock model,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1972–1976, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. Sakashita, E. Hiyama, Y. Imamura et al., “Generation of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the gut in zymosan-induced peritonitis,” Hiroshima Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. Erdmann, A. C. Roth, J. Hussmann et al., “Skin allograft rejection and hyperbaric oxygen treatment in immune-histoincompatible mice,” Undersea & Hyperbaric Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 395–399, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  39. J. F. Hansbrough, J. G. Piacentine, and B. Eiseman, “Immunosuppression by hyperbaric oxygen,” Surgery, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 662–667, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  40. K. Saito, Y. Tanaka, T. Ota, S. Eto, and U. Yamashita, “Suppressive effect of hyperbaric oxygenation on immune responses of normal and autoimmune mice,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 322–327, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  41. X. Xu, H. Yi, M. Kato et al., “Differential sensitivities to hyperbaric oxygen of lymphocyte subpopulations of normal and autoimmune mice,” Immunology Letters, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 79–84, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Kudchodkar, H. Jones, J. Simecka, and L. Dory, “Hyperbaric oxygen treatment attenuates the pro-inflammatory and immune responses in apolipoprotein E knockout mice,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 435–441, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. J. Hall, E. Faivre, A. Quinlan, F. Shanahan, K. Nally, and S. Melgar, “Induction and activation of adaptive immune populations during acute and chronic phases of a murine model of experimental colitis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Schippers, M. Muschaweck, T. Clahsen et al., “β7-Integrin exacerbates experimental DSS-induced colitis in mice by directing inflammatory monocytes into the colon,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 9, pp. 527–538, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. K. Lee, R. B. Hester, J. H. Coggin, and S. F. Gottlieb, “Increased oxygen tensions modulate the cellular composition of the adaptive immune system in BALB/c mice,” Cancer Biotherapy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. E. Qualls, A. M. Kaplan, N. Van Rooijen, and D. A. Cohen, “Suppression of experimental colitis by intestinal mononuclear phagocytes,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 802–815, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. G. Butler, J. C. Michaels, N. Al-Waili et al., “Therapeutic effect of hyperbaric oxygen in psoriasis vulgaris: two case reports and a review of the literature,” Journal of Medical Case Reports, vol. 3, article 7023, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C.-C. Niu, S.-S. Lin, L.-J. Yuan et al., “Hyperbaric oxygen treatment suppresses MAPK signaling and mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in degenerated human intervertebral disc cells,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 204–209, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. G. Weisz, A. Lavy, Y. Adir et al., “Modification of in vivo and in vitro TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 secretion by circulating monocytes during hyperbaric oxygen treatment in patients with perianal Crohn's disease,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 154–159, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Schieber and N. S. Chandel, “ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress,” Current Biology, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. R453–R462, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. Perše and A. Cerar, “Dextran sodium sulphate colitis mouse model: traps and tricks,” Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 718617, 3 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Hultqvist, L. M. Olsson, K. A. Gelderman, and R. Holmdahl, “The protective role of ROS in autoimmune disease,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 201–208, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. K. Pandurangan, N. Mohebali, M. E. Norhaizan, and C. Y. Looi, “Gallic acid attenuates dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis in BALB/c mice,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 9, pp. 3923–3934, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Yu, W. Tian, H. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Effects of hyperbaric oxygen and cyclosporin A on the levels of active oxygens and nitric oxide in spleens of skin transplanted mice,” Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology, vol. 16, pp. 1286–1288, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  55. L. Ma, P. Li, Z. Shi, T. Hou, X. Chen, and J. Du, “A prospective, randomized, controlled study of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: effects on healing and oxidative stress of ulcer tissue in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer,” Ostomy/Wound Management, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 18–24, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  56. O. Altinel, S. Demirbas, E. Cakir et al., “Comparison of hyperbaric oxygen and medical ozone therapies in a rat model of experimental distal colitis,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 185–192, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. L. Gill and C. N. A. Bell, “Hyperbaric oxygen: its uses, mechanisms of action and outcomes,” Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 385–395, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. A. Forsythe, B.-H. Jiang, N. V. Iyer et al., “Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 4604–4613, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. Flück, G. Breves, J. Fandrey, and S. Winning, “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in dendritic cells is crucial for the activation of protective regulatory T cells in murine colitis,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 379–390, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. B. J. Saeedi, D. J. Kao, D. A. Kitzenberg et al., “HIF-dependent regulation of claudin-1 is central to intestinal epithelial tight junction integrity,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2252–2262, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. Robinson, S. Keely, J. Karhausen, M. E. Gerich, G. T. Furuta, and S. P. Colgan, “Mucosal protection by hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibition,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 145–155, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. Karhausen, G. T. Furuta, J. E. Tomaszewski, R. S. Johnson, S. P. Colgan, and V. H. Haase, “Epithelial hypoxia-inducible factor-1 is protective in murine experimental colitis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1098–1106, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. C. J. Kelly, L. E. Glover, E. L. Campbell et al., “Fundamental role for HIF-1α in constitutive expression of human β defensin-1,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1110–1118, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. Huang, W. Fang, Y. Wang, W. Yang, and B. Xiong, “Transforming growth factor-β1 induces glutathione peroxidase-1 and protects from H2O2-induced cell death in colon cancer cells via the Smad2/ERK1/2/HIF-1α pathway,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 906–912, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. E. R. Tuller, C. T. Beavers, J. R. Lou, M. A. Ihnat, D. M. Benbrook, and W.-Q. Ding, “Docosahexaenoic acid inhibits superoxide dismutase 1 gene transcription in human cancer cells: the involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α and hypoxia-inducible factor-2α signaling,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 588–595, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. N. Hatano, Y. Itoh, H. Suzuki et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) switches on transient receptor potential ankyrin repeat 1 (TRPA1) gene expression via a hypoxia response element-like motif to modulate cytokine release,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 38, pp. 31962–31972, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H.-J. Jeong, H.-S. Chung, B.-R. Lee et al., “Expression of proinflammatory cytokines via HIF-1α and NF-κβ activation on desferrioxamine-stimulated HMC-1 cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 306, no. 4, pp. 805–811, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. H.-J. Jeong, S.-H. Hong, R.-K. Park, T. Shin, N.-H. An, and H.-M. Kim, “Hypoxia-induced IL-6 production is associated with activation of MAP kinase, HIF-1, and NF-κB on HEI-OC1 cells,” Hearing Research, vol. 207, no. 1-2, pp. 59–67, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. A. Rahat, H. Bitterman, and N. Lahat, “Molecular mechanisms regulating macrophage response to hypoxia,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 2, article 45, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Sanja Novak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.