The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 259765 | 13 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/259765

Assessment of Cellular Responses after Short- and Long-Term Exposure to Silver Nanoparticles in Human Neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) and Astrocytoma (D384) Cells

Academic Editor: B. Soto-Blanco
Received18 Nov 2013
Accepted29 Dec 2013
Published13 Feb 2014

Abstract

Silver nanoparticle (AgNP, 20 nm) neurotoxicity was evaluated by an integrated in vitro testing protocol employing human cerebral (SH-SY5Y and D384) cell lines. Cellular response after short-term (4–48 h, 1–100 μg/ml) and prolonged exposure (up to 10 days, 0.5–50 μg/ml) to AgNP was assessed by MTT, calcein-AM/PI, clonogenic tests. Pulmonary A549 cells were employed for data comparison along with silver nitrate as metal ionic form. Short-term data: (i) AgNP produced dose- and time-dependent mitochondrial metabolism changes and cell membrane damage (effects starting at 25 μg/ml after 4 h: EC50s were 40.7 ± 2.0 and 49.5 ± 2.1 μg/ml for SH-SY5Y and D384, respectively). A549 were less vulnerable; (ii) AgNP doses of ≤ 18 μg/ml were noncytotoxic; (iii) AgNO3 induced more pronounced effects compared to AgNP on cerebral cells. Long-term data: (i) low AgNP doses (≤1 μg/ml) compromised proliferative capacity of all cell types (cell sensibility: SHSY5Y > A549 > D384). Colony number decrease in SH-SY5Y and D384 was 50% and 25%, respectively, at 1 μg/ml, and lower dose (0.5 μg/ml) was significantly effective towards SH-SY5Y and pulmonary cells; (ii) cell proliferation activity was more affected by AgNO3 than AgNPs. In summary, AgNP-induced cytotoxic effects after short-term and prolonged exposure (even at low doses) were evidenced regardless of cell model types.

1. Introduction

Although there is great uncertainty over the potential risks of nanotechnology products, their commercialization continues to grow albeit under conditions of uncertainty regarding the implications for health and the environment [1]. Currently, the majority of nanotechnology-enabled consumer products are based on nanoscale silver [2]. Nanosilver or nanoparticle sized silver (AgNP) provides a greater surface area of silver and theoretically a more efficacious product with higher activity than its bulk counterpart [3]. The many possibilities offered by AgNP in medical application (due to its antibacterial properties and as biosensors and imaging contrast agents), but also in the growth market of consumer products (e.g., for disinfection of water, as well as coating of surfaces in contact with human skin, textiles, or food) have raised much scientific interest and concern in the last decade [4]. The sophistication of this new nanotechnology and its proliferation (largely uncontrolled) raises new questions of health and environmental impact. One of the relevant questions regarding the safety of nanosilver in consumer products that still needs to be clarified is whether the toxic potential of nanosilver is identical to “classical” silver [5]. The point is that silver is an old problem and nanosilver is a new challenge. The scope of the new challenge is not yet clear because it is uncertain how much nanosilver is now used as an antimicrobial in commercial and consumer products and because new uses are likely to be discovered in the future. Actually, AgNP regulation is still undergoing major changes to encompass environmental, health, and safety issues [6]. The uncertainty of the safety may be compounded by lack of toxicological data and lifecycle studies of acceptable environmental exposure limits to nanosilver compounds.

Although a lot of work has been done as well as many reports and reviews have been published on nanosilver [7], few studies have been performed to address AgNP exposure and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity.

Since the extent of human exposure to AgNPs and their likelihood internalization has strongly increased during the last years, the internalized AgNPs may finally also reach the brain and encounter brain cells. Recent studies have drawn attention towards potential neurotoxic effects of AgNPs. It is well known that the CNS is highly sensitive to metals including silver [8, 9] which is known to avidly bind to the cells of nervous system. Moreover its biological half-life in the CNS is longer than that in other organs causing neurotoxic damage, consequences, and risks to the brain following prolonged exposure [10]. Decreased activity in mice and concomitant granular silver deposits, especially in brain areas involved in motor control, was found in mice orally exposed to AgNO3 for four months [11]. With respect to AgNPs, there is evidence, although little, indicating that AgNP itself can impact the CNS. AgNPs can cross and disrupt the rat blood-brain barrier [12, 13] and even aggravate heat stress-induced cognitive deficits, edema formation, and brain pathology [14]. In vivo effects of AgNPs include edema [13] and changes in the brain mRNA levels of genes linked to increased oxidative stress [15]. In vivo studies have also indicated that AgNPs accumulate in the rodent olfactory bulb and brain after inhalation; thus, by retrograde transport, AgNPs might get access to selective regions of the CNS inducing brain inflammation and neurotoxicity [16].

Currently, few are also the data regarding the in vitro neurotoxicity of AgNPs on human nervous system cells [17, 18]. The majority of toxicological data published on AgNPs derives from in vitro studies which typically have used rat neuronal-like cell lines, mostly PC-12 cells [1923] or primary neural cells obtained from rodents [2427]. Disruption and inflammation have also been demonstrated in in vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) models (from rat) following incubation with AgNPs [28, 29].

Standard toxicological tests are still needed to be performed to assess the risk of AgNPs. For example, biosafety of ENMs (man-made particles with any external dimension between 1 and 100 nm) could be evaluated by tests examining general toxicity, target organ toxicity, and biocompatibility in line with regulatory requirements, applying alternative test methods (e.g., in vitro cellular assays) limiting the use of lab animals in toxicological research [3032], to identify molecular endpoints and multiple toxicity pathways. In vitro studies can obtain toxicological data relevant to design appropriate exposure concentrations and define critical health endpoints to be monitored in vivo.

The present investigation proposes an integrated in vitro testing protocol for the screening of AgNP neurotoxicity using representative human cerebral cell lines and a battery of cytotoxicity tests to simulate both short- and long-term exposure. In particular, increasing concentrations of critical doses of an AgNP model (20 nm) have been evaluated:(i)in brain cells, namely, human astrocytoma D384 and neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell lines, as well as in human lung epithelial cells (A549), for data comparison, since some cytotoxicity results in A549 are already available such as those related to AgNP acute exposure [33, 34];(ii)after short-term exposure (4–24–48 h) at doses ranging from 1 to 100 μg/mL and prolonged (up to 10 days) exposure at low doses ranging from 0.5 to 50 μg/mL.

The cellular biological responses after AgNP treatment included the evaluation of mitochondrial function (using MTT test), membrane integrity and cellular morphology (by calcein-AM/propidium iodide staining), cellular growth, and proliferation (clonogenic tests for sublethal effects).

Silver nitrate (AgNO3) has been concomitantly tested, in all experiment types, as positive control for silver toxicity caused by metal ionic form added as soluble salt.

The choice of AgNP size and concentrations was based on previously reports indicating than AgNPs (20 nm) possessed high cytotoxic properties with respect to permeating and damaging cerebral microvascular structures, as compared with larger particles (40 and 80 nm) [29]. Smaller nanoparticles (20 nm) have also been shown to induce higher levels of cellular oxidative damage [26]. Experiments conducted with 20–40 nm AgNPs and using concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 μg/mL to examine the potential hazardous effects of AgNPs with rat primary neuronal cells have found that AgNPs affect voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels, disturb neuronal calcium homeostasis, and reduce dopamine concentration [2426].

Based on these studies, we pursued to identify the effects not only after AgNP acute exposure but also after continuous exposure to AgNPs (20 nm) at low doses of 0.5, 1, 10, 25, and 50 μg/mL on human CNS cell viability, metabolic activity, membrane integrity, and cell morphology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All cell culture reagents, culture medium, chemicals, and silver nitrate (AgNO3) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy).

2.2. Physicochemical Characteristics of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs)

AgNPs were supplied by Colorobbia (Colorobbia S.p.A., Vinci, Italy), series PARNASOS NAMA 39 1103 F01 1%. The characteristics of AgNP 1% in water with the appearance of brown colour were 1 g/cm3 density, 3 mPa/sec viscosity (25°C), <0.50 PdI, 6.5 pH, and 20 nm nominal hydrodynamic size diameter (20–100 nm size distribution determined by Dynamic light scattering by Malvern Instruments Ltd.).

2.3. In Vitro Studies
2.3.1. Cell Line and Cell Culture

Human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y cell line purchased from ECACC, Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy), human astrocytoma cells (D384 clonal cell line was established from [35]), and human lung epithelial cells (A549 cell line purchased from ECACC, Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) were used for in vitro studies of the AgNP toxicity after short- (4–48 h) and long-term (7–10 days) exposure.

SH-SY5Y cells were cultured in Eagle’s minimum essential medium and Ham’s F12 (1 : 1) with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 IU/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin.

D384 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 IU/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, and 1% sodium pyruvate. A549 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 IU/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin. Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere (95% air/5% CO2).

Stock solutions were prepared by dissolving AgNPs in culture medium; cells were exposed to concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 100 μg/mL. For comparison, equivalent amount of AgNO3 was tested. Fresh solutions of test materials were prepared shortly before each experiment.

2.4. Cytotoxicity Study: Short-Term Exposure (4–48 h)
2.4.1. Mitochondrial Function (MTT Assay) and Membrane Integrity (Calcein-AM/Propidium Iodide Staining)

The cellular viability, membrane integrity, and cell morphology of SH-SY5Y, D384, and A549 cells treated with AgNPs or AgNO3 were determined using two colorimetric methodologies: MTT assay enables accurate, straightforward quantification of changes in metabolic activities (i.e., mitochondrial function) and calcein-AM/propidium iodide (PI) staining allows qualitative evaluation on membrane integrity and cell morphology and quantitative evaluation on cell viability (cell live/cell death).

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at density of cells/well in complete medium. After 24 h of cell attachment, the cells were exposed to AgNPs or AgNO3 at final concentrations between 1 and 100 μg/mL for 4, 24, and 48 h at 37°C.

At the end of the incubation period, the mitochondrial function was assessed by 0.5 mg/mL MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) for 3 h at 37°C and was quantified spectrophotometrically at 550 nm in Bio-Rad microplate reader. Data were expressed as a percentage of control (untreated cells).

The membrane integrity and cell morphology were evaluated by the coincubation of the double staining: 2 μM calcein-AM and 2.5 μg/mL PI for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were examined under a Zeiss Axiovert 25 fluorescence microscope combined with digital camera (Canon powershot G8). The fluorescence images were taken using 32x objective lens with an excitation wavelength of 400, 495, and 570 nm, beamsplitter wavelength of 410, 505, and 585 nm, and an emission wavelength of 460, 530, and 610 nm. Viability was expressed as % of cells that retained calcein (green fluorescence) compared to the total cells counted (calcein-positive plus PI-positive (red fluorescence)).

2.5. Cytotoxicity Study: Long-Term Exposure (10 Days)
2.5.1. Clonogenic Assay

The procedure for clonogenic assay with the presently used cell types was previously described [36]. Briefly, cells were seeded in six-well plates at density of 300 cells/well for SH-SY5Y cells, 50 cells/well for D384 cells, and 400 cells/well for A549 cells, each well containing 2 mL of cell culture medium. After attachment (about 20 h for SH-SY5Y, 4 h for D384 cells, and 14 h for A549 cells; each time was shorter than the population doubling time 48, 9, and 24 h, resp.) the cells were washed with 2 mL PBS and treated with 2 mL AgNPs (final concentration ranging from 0.5 to 50 μg/mL in cell culture medium) or AgNO3, over a time period required to form colonies (about 10 days for SH-SY5Y and A549 cells and 7 days for D384 cells). A colony being defined as at least 50 clones of one cell. At the end of the treatment, the medium was removed and the colonies were fixed, stained with hematoxylin, and then were manually counted for the evaluation of cell survival after AgNP and AgNO3 treatments. The minimum size of colony was considered to be 50 cells/colony. The colonies were examined under Zeiss Axiovert 25 microscope combined with a digital camera (Canon powershot G8). Digital photographs were taken from each well using 2.5x objective lens. The number of colonies that arose after treatment was expressed in terms of plating efficiency (PE). PE was calculated by dividing the number of colonies formed by the number of cells plated per 100.

2.6. Statistics

Data from short-term exposure were obtained from three independent experiments, each experiment was carried out in six replicates. Data from long-term exposure were obtained from two independent experiments and each experiment was carried out in three replicates. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (for each time point). A value of was considered statistically significant.

Cytotoxicity data by MTT was fitted to an exponential growth model in order to calculate the 50% effective concentration (EC50). This analysis was performed using the REGTOX-EV7.xls curve fitting add-in macro for Microsoft Excel (http://www.normalesup.org/~vindimian/macro/REGTOX_EV7.0.6.xls).

3. Results

3.1. Cytotoxic Activity of AgNPs Compared to AgNO3 in Human Nervous (SH-SY5Y and D384 Cell Lines) and Pulmonary Cells (A549 Cell Line)

In vitro cytotoxicity due to the short (4–24–48 h) and prolonged (7 or 10 days) exposure of SH-SY5Y, D384, and A549 cells to increasing concentrations of AgNPs (from 0.5 to 100 μg/mL) and AgNO3 is reported and compared. Mitochondrial function, membrane integrity, and cell morphology were considered as endpoints of acute exposure, while the capacity to form colonies was considered as endpoint of chronic exposure.

3.2. Cytotoxicity Results after Short-Term Exposure (4–48 h)
3.2.1. Mitochondrial Function. MTT Assay

Data of mitochondrial function, evaluated by MTT after 4, 24, and 48 h of exposure to increasing concentrations of AgNPs (1–100 μg/mL) and expressed as percentage of the viability of control, are presented in Figure 1. AgNPs induced dose-dependent cytotoxic effects on both SH-SY5Y and D384 cells; there was a strong cell viability decrease already after 4 h exposure (Figure 1(a)); loss of cell viability was about 25–85% at doses ranging from 25 to 100 μg/mL, and no effect was observed from 1 to 17.5 μg/mL. The cytotoxic effect of AgNPs for both cerebral cell types was shown to be more pronounced after 24 and 48 h exposure as indicated by about 100% reduction of cell viability at the highest tested doses (50–100 μg/mL) (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). A549 cells were less susceptible than cerebral cells, showing about 35% cell viability reduction after 48 h exposure to the highest tested dose of 100 μg/mL AgNPs (Figure 1(c)).

In addition, MTT data were used to calculate EC50 (50% effective concentration) values and were used to compare the toxicity rank of AgNPs on SH-SY5Y, D384, and A549 cell lines. As illustrated in Table 1, both the of SH-SY5Y and D384 were observed to be dependent on the dose used and time period of exposure, while the EC50 of A549 was significantly greater than the highest dose of AgNP tested, indicating that A549 cells were less susceptible to AgNP treatment compared to SHSY5Y and D384 cells.


Cell typeEC50 ( g/mL)
4 h
exposure
24 h
exposure
48 h
exposure

SH-SY5Y
D384
A549No cytotoxic effectsNo cytotoxic effectsCytotoxic effects starting at >100  g/mL (about 65% viability)

AgNP versus AgNO3 Comparison. Using AgNO3 at 1 and 10 μg/mL, the noncytotoxic doses for AgNPs, a strong toxic effect was observed especially at 10 μg/mL in both cerebral cell lines (SH-SY5Y and D384 cells) and for each considered time point (i.e., 4, 24, and 48 h), while in A549, the AgNO3 effect was less pronounced (Figures 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c)).

Specifically, up to about 18 μg/mL AgNPs did not produce any cytotoxic effect within 48 h in all considered cell types differently from AgNO3 that showed to be very toxic (especially at 10 μg/mL) in the cerebral cell lines and weakly effective in A549.

3.2.2. Membrane Integrity: Calcein-AM/PI Staining

Membrane integrity and cell morphology were evaluated by calcein-AM/PI staining after 4, 24, and 48 h exposure to increasing concentrations of AgNPs (1–100 μg/mL). Figure 3 describes a panel of representative and randomly selected microscopic fields of SH-SY5Y, D384, and A549 cells treated with AgNPs. Effect on cell viability was also confirmed using calcein-AM/PI double staining for all cell types.

The green fluorescence of SH-SY5Y and D384 cells after 4 h exposure was uniformly diffused in cell cytoplasm (indicating the maintained membrane integrity) at doses ranging from 1 to 25 μg/mL and cell morphology was not altered with respect to control (1–10 μg/mL data are shown in the Supplementary additional file 1, available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/259765; it reports membrane integrity evaluation by Calcein-AM/PI staining of SH-SY5Y, D384, or A549 cells after 4, 24, and 48 h exposure to increasing concentrations (1–100 μg/ml) of AgNPs. Figure 3 shows 25–100 μg/mL), while a strong decrease in cell viability for both cell lines was observed as evidenced by the presence of numerous red coloured cells (indicating damage to the cell membrane) at the highest doses (50–100 μg/mL) (Figure 3).

After 24 and 48 h, the cytotoxic effect of AgNP was exacerbated as even shown by semiquantitative analysis (Table 2) of selected microscopic fields, in terms of cell counts and expressed as percentage of live cells (green fluorescence). SH-SY5Y cells were more sensitive towards AgNPs since the cell loss was evident at the dose of 25 μg/mL (Figure 3; Table 2).


AgNP (μg/mL)Live cells (%)
4 h exposure24 h exposure48 h exposure

SH-SY5Y cells
1100100100
10100100100
25100
500*0*0*
1000*0*0*

D384 cells
1100100100
10100100100
25100100100
50
100 0*0*

A549 cells
1100100
10100100
25100100
50100100
100100100

Mean of 6 images for each cell type and each dose of AgNPs. *Statistical analysis by ANOVA with Tukey’s test compared to its control ( ).

Fluorescence images of A549 cells (Figure 3) showed uniformly diffused green fluorescence and normal cell morphology for all treatment concentrations (1–100 μg/mL) and at each time point (4, 24, and 48 h) when compared to control. Semiquantitative analysis on A549 cells with increasing concentrations of AgNPs (1–100 μg/mL) showed a slight decrease of cell viability (about 15–20%) after 48 h exposure only (Table 2).

AgNP versus AgNO3 Comparison. Cytotoxicity induced by AgNO3 and evaluated with calcein-AM/PI still shows to be pronounced at 1 and 10 μg/mL (noncytotoxic doses for AgNPs) for both SH-SY5Y and D384 cells and at each considered time point (i.e., 4, 24, and 48 h), while, in A549, both AgNO3 and AgNPs produced similar cytotoxic effect for both 1 and 10 μg/mL doses (Figures 2(d), 2(e), and 2(f)).

3.3. Cytotoxicity Results after Long-Term Exposure (10 Days)
3.3.1. Clonogenic Assay

To determine whether the prolonged exposure (up to 10 days) to increasing AgNP concentrations (0.5–50 μg/mL) might cause adverse effects, the proliferation ability and colony forming capacity of SH-SY5Y, D384, and A549 cells were evaluated. Figure 4 shows representative images of randomly selected microscopic fields of the different cell types.

Colonies of SH-SY5Y and D384 treated with increasing concentrations of AgNPs (0.5–25 μg/mL) and colonies of A549 treated with AgNPs (0.5–50 μg/mL) showed dose-dependent reductions on size and colony number, as well as changes in colony morphology compared to each respective control (Figures 4(a), 4(b), and 4(c)). Semiquantitative analysis showed a strong reduction (about 90%) of colony number of D384 at the highest treatment dose of 25 μg/mL, and SH-SY5Y cells were totally inhibited (Figure 4(d)). AgNP effect was more pronounced on SH-SY5Y compared to D384: 50% versus 25% decrease in colony number for SH-SY5Y and D384, respectively, at 1 μg/mL, and 45% decrease was already observed in SH-SY5Y at the lowest tested dose of 0.5 μg/mL.

Different from short-term exposure data, A549 cells showed to be sensitive towards AgNP exposure already after applying the lowest dose of 0.5 μg/mL. Moreover, 75% decrease in colony number was observed at the dose of 10 AgNP μg/mL, and total inhibition was observed at doses from 25 to 50 μg/mL (Figure 4).

AgNP versus AgNO3 Comparison. Data comparison between AgNP and AgNO3 indicated that the latter caused more pronounced effects than those produced by AgNP towards all cell types, that is, cerebral and pulmonary (Figure 5). In particular, in A549 cells, 1 μg/mL of AgNO3 treatment produced a total blockage of the colony formation (i.e., inhibition of cell proliferative activity), while similar amount of AgNP caused 85% reduction (Figure 5(b)).

4. Discussion

The present study provides the first cytotoxic evidence that exposure of human cerebral SH-SY5Y and D384 cell lines to AgNPs causes cytotoxic effects not only after short-term exposure (4–48 h) altering mitochondrial metabolism, membrane integrity, and morphology but also after long-term exposure (up to 10 days), at particularly low doses, compromising growth and cell proliferation.

The major results obtained after short-term exposure (4–48 h) indicate that:(i)AgNP treatment produced dose- and time-dependent neurotoxic effects, as indicated by changes in mitochondrial metabolism and damage to the cell membrane, on cerebral cell lines (SH-SY5Y and D384) starting at the dose of 25 μg/mL and after 4 h exposure. EC50 values were and μg/mL for SH-SY5Y and D384, respectively, after 4 h exposure. Pulmonary cells (A549) were less vulnerable to AgNP exposure compared to cerebral cell types;(ii)low doses (up to about 18 μg/mL) of AgNPs did not produce any cytotoxic effect within 48 h;(iii)the magnitude of effects caused by AgNO3 was more pronounced compared to that produced by comparable amount of AgNPs on cerebral cell lines: at 10 μg/mL AgNPs did not produce cytotoxic effect in all cell types considered differently from AgNO3 that showed to be very toxic. In A549 cells analogous low cytotoxic profile was observed after both treatment types (AgNPs and AgNO3).

Data achieved after long-term exposure (up to 10 days) revealed that:(i)extremely low doses (≤1 μg/mL) of AgNPs were critical for cell viability since they were able to compromise the proliferative capacity. The effect was evident regardless of cell model type; cell sensitivity was SH-SY5Y > A549 > D384. Decrease in SH-SY5Y and D384 colony number was 50% and 25%, respectively, at 1 μg/mL, and exposure to even lower AgNP dose, such as 0.5 μg/mL, was significantly effective towards SH-SY5Y and pulmonary cells;(ii)different from what was observed in short-term exposure experiments, A549 cells were very sensitive towards a prolonged exposure to AgNPs: 10 μg/mL caused 75% colony number decrease and ≥25 μg/mL suppressed cell growth;(iii)AgNO3 induced a more pronounced effect on growth and cell proliferation than AgNP treatment.

Regarding the AgNP short-term exposure (4–48 h), we used viability assays (namely, MTT test and Calcein-AM/PI), vital steps in toxicology that explain the cellular response to a toxicant. They give information on cell death, survival, and metabolic activities. The mitochondrial damage is indicated by the reduced dehydrogenase activity as measured by the reduction of tetrazolium dye (MTT), which takes place at the ubiquinone and cytochrome b and c sites of the mitochondrial electron transport chain [37]. Membrane integrity is indicated by intracellular esterases activity, while cells with cell membrane damaged are detected by propidium iodide intercalating between the bases of nucleic acids. Simultaneously both live and death cells are marked; the damage in the cell membrane indicates that more cell population is possibly dying by either necrotic or apoptotic pathway.

Our data using these endpoints clearly indicate that no alteration can be detected up to 18 μg/mL in all cell types (cerebral and pulmonary). With respect to the cerebral cell lines, these results are in accordance with data of Luther et al. [23] showing that acute exposure (4 h) of primary astrocytes to AgNPs (1–100 μM corresponding to about 1.78–10.78 μg/mL) did not compromise cell viability despite leading to a concentration-dependent increase in the specific cellular silver content to up to 46 nmol/mg protein. During a subsequent incubation of the cells in AgNP-free medium, the cellular silver content of AgNP-treated astrocytes remained almost constant for up to 7 days, but the cellular presence of AgNP did neither induce any delayed cell toxicity nor compromise basal metabolism. Nevertheless, AgNP-treated astrocytes strongly upregulated the expression of metallothioneins which (as suggested by the authors) could have helped prevent silver-mediated toxicity induced by possibly AgNP derived silver ions.

In acute (24 h) experiments, using mixed rat primary neuronal cell cultures (astrocytes and neurons) exposed to AgNP 5–10 μg/mL, a significant cytotoxic effect was observed at 10 μg/mL as well as grossly morphological disorganization of the astrocytes but not neurons, and this seems consistently with the finding that AgNPs were mainly taken up by astrocytes and not by neurons. At higher concentration such as 20 μg/mL AgNPs, both cell types exhibited an equally affected morphology [26].

Other experiments conducted with 20–40 nm AgNPs (1–100 μg/mL) to examine the potential hazardous effects of AgNPs with rat primary neuronal cells demonstrated that AgNPs inhibited neuronal sodium and potassium currents at 10 μg/mL, disturbed neuronal calcium homeostasis at 5 μg/mL, and reduced dopamine concentration at 50 μg/mL [24, 25]. On the other hand, up to now, effects due to acute exposure to a noncytotoxic AgNP doses, such as <0.5 μg/mL, were observed only in human epathoma cells (HepG2) in which induced gene expression associated with the cycle progression and apoptosis was reported [38].

The present study clearly demonstrated that cerebral cells (SH-SY5Y and D384) were more vulnerable (effects at concentrations > 10 μg/mL AgNPs) than A549 cells in all the short-term cytotoxicity assays; the toxic effects in A549 are evident only 48 h after exposure to the highest dosages (50–100 μg/mL). Indeed, a recent study indicated no toxicity for AgNPs (up to 10 μg/mL of silver) on A549 cells although a high cellular uptake was demonstrated. This lack of toxicity was suggested to be most likely due to low intracellular release of silver ions from AgNPs within short-time periods (4–24 h) [39]. Silver ions seemed to be toxic via extracellular mechanisms causing cell membrane damage; hypothesis based on the evidence that silver ions dissolved from AgNO3 (with a relatively low cellular penetration capacity) induced much more cell death in terms of loss in cell membrane integrity compared to the exposure to AgNP that did not cause any effect despite its high cellular uptake and high dosage of silver.

The present results obtained after long-term treatment with AgNP suggest that continuous exposure to low AgNP doses (≤1 μg/mL) severely affected proliferation of all cell types (SH-SY5Y, D384, and A549).

We used clonogenic test, a noncolorimetric assay, to determine the proliferation ability of all cell types upon long-term exposure to AgNPs. Clonogenic assay is a cell survival assay using the ability of cells to form colonies when seeded at very low cellular concentrations; it identifies the cells that are destined to die or survive. Studies using the clonogenic assay to evaluate cell survival after exposure to nanomaterials are very limited. However, it has been found that this assay was suitable for testing the toxicity of carbon nanotubes [40, 41].

Recently, concentration-dependent effects on the proliferation ability of RBE4 cells (microvascular endothelial cells important for proper function of BBB) exposed to different-sized (10, 50, and 100 nm) citrate-coated AgNPs for up to 5 days were observed; the colony number was reduced after exposure to 0.01 and 0.1 μg/mL AgNPs (10 nm) and was totally suppressed at 5 μg/mL [42].

Few data on cultured neurons [27] other than ours indicate that AgNP induces toxicity in cerebral cells at remarkably low doses of 0.5–1 μg/mL in conditions of prolonged AgNP presence. In particular, cultured rat cortical neurons exposed to 1 μg/mL of AgNPs for 2-3 days exhibited compromised cell morphological integrity, degradation of synaptic proteins, and degeneration of cytoskeletal proteins (beta-tubulin and F-actin) [27]. Our results indicate that a longer period of exposure (up to 10 days) to AgNP concentrations even below 1 μg/mL (i.e., 0.5 μg/mL) led to a reduced size and colony number as well as changes in colony morphology in SH-SY5Y and pulmonary cell lines compared to untreated cells. SH-SY5Y cells were apparently more susceptible against AgNP treatment when compared with D384 cells (toxic effect at 0.5 μg/mL for SH-SY5Y and 1 μg/mL for D384). This finding is of special interest due to, on one side, the recognized particular role of astrocytes in several neurodegenerative diseases; being more likely, the cell type initially affected during pathogenesis [43]. On the other hand, astrocytes have a variety of important functions such as supplying of metabolic nutrients to neurons and protecting the brain against oxidative stress and metal toxicity [4447]. Astrocytes communicate with neurons to enable synapse formation, synaptic transmission, plasticity, and synaptic homeostasis [48, 49]. The high vulnerability of neurons other than astrocytes observed after long-term exposure to low AgNP doses, as demonstrated here, might thus have fundamental consequences on the proper function of neural networks. In addition, several studies have also reported that the rate of nanoparticle translocation into the brain can be significantly increased under certain pathological conditions, such as infection, meningitis, and systemic inflammation [10, 14].

The in vivo relevance of these cell culture data should therefore be addressed to explore the CNS effects in in vivo situation. So far, the few in vivo rodent studies have mostly used high level exposure to AgNPs indicating AgNP-induced significant toxicity to a variety of organs including lung, liver, and brain (see review of [50]) with brain appearing as the most sensitive organ. Increased Ag concentrations in the rat brain and olfactory region (about 1.4 and 1.9 ng/g wet weight, resp.) immediately and (about 1.2 and 3.1 ng/g, resp.) one day after 6 h inhalation exposure to 15 nm AgNPs (cumulative dose of 7.2 μg) were reported [51]. In rats subcutaneously injected with AgNPs (<100 nm) at 62.8 mg/kg bw, silver crossed the blood-brain barrier and accumulated in the brain (starting at 2 weeks after exposure with levels of  ng/brain) along with other organs. Significantly higher Ag tissue content, than in the control group, was observed from 4 to 24 weeks ( and  ng/brain, resp.) after exposure and increased incidence of astrocyte swelling and neuronal degeneration was reported from 2 to 24 weeks after exposure due to the accumulation of AgNPs [12].

Altogether, these in vivo studies (relevant although with high Ag dosage) along with recent in vitro results, including ours (especially from prolonged exposure to AgNPs), encourage additional research and investigation addressing chronic low-dose AgNP exposure that would be useful to translate a realistic human chronic exposure scenario.

Despite several recent in vitro and in vivo publications on AgNP toxicity, the mechanism of AgNP toxicity remains unclear. The most critical question is whether AgNP toxicity is mechanistically unique to nanoparticulate silver or it is the results of the release of silver ions (Ag+), a well-known molecular toxicant, or it is the combination of both.

Actually we did not measure the Ag+ cellular uptake and release from NPs. The latter seems to depend on a variety of factors, such as particle size, the medium used to disperse the NPs, the temperature, the particles crystallinity, and the surface functionalization [52, 53]. Several studies suggest that the mechanism of AgNP toxicity is largely explained by Ag ions (Ag+). For example, lack of toxicity was observed when Ag+ was complexed by a thiol ligand [5458] or when AgNP was tested under strictly anaerobic conditions that precluded Ag(0) oxidation and Ag+ release [59]. Genetic analysis also evidenced that AgNP toxicity was mediated by ionic silver release [60]. Ag+ may be released into solution or may be sorbed by the AgNPs and delivered locally at high doses to the cell (i.e., the Trojan horse effect) [61, 62]. Other studies suggest that ion release does not explain all toxicity, and some support a role for generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which might occur at the surface of AgNPs [17, 6366] but is not expected to result from silver ion dissolution alone. One study reported that cysteine, a strong Ag+ ligand, only partially rescued AgNP toxicity [38], while others found that AgNP cytotoxicity was independent of Ag+ concentration and resulted primarily from oxidative stress [65, 67].

5. Conclusion

This study demonstrates cytotoxic effects of AgNPs. The cerebral cell lines are more susceptible than pulmonary ones after acute exposure, while prolonged exposure to low AgNP doses significantly compromises the proliferative capacity of all cell model types.

The relevance of these results is based on the fact that human lung epithelial cells (A549) are representative for common route of human AgNP exposure (e.g., inhalation) and AgNPs are able to translocate from the site of entry to several secondary organs including the CNS.

These in vitro approaches (several endpoints and short- and long-term exposure) allow high throughput, replicates, and parallel complementary tests, which can explain the molecular response of cells caused by AgNP exposure and help to design focused in vivo realistic studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Italian Ministries of Health, Research and Education, and CARIPLO Foundation (Rif. 2011-2096).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure: Membrane integrity evaluation after 4-48 h exposure to increasing concentrations of AgNP (1-100 μg/ml). Representative images of randomly selected microscopic fields of cells (SH-SY5Y, D384, or A549) stained with calcein-AM/PI after 4 (A), 24 (B) and 48 (C) h exposure to increasing concentrations (1-100 μg/ml) of AgNPs. Green fluorescence patterns of both cerebral cell lines were similar to the controls at doses ranging 1 to 25 μg/ml at time points (4, 24 and 48 h). A strong decrease in cell viability was observed as evidenced by the presence of numerous red coloured cells (indicating damage to the cell membrane) at the highest doses (50-100 μg/ml). After 24 and 48 h, the cytotoxic effect of AgNPs was exacerbated. Fluorescence images of A549 cells (A, B, C) showed uniformly diffused green fluorescence, and normal cell morphology for all treatment concentrations (1-100 μg/ml), was observed a slight decrease of cell viability after 48 h exposure only (scale bar 100 μm).

  1. Supplementary Figure

References

  1. C. Hwang and D. Shen, “The effects of blast-furnace slag and fly ash on the hydration of Portland cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 21, pp. 410–425, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, “The project on emerging nanotechnologies. Nanoscale silver: no silver lining?” 2011, http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/analysis_draft/. View at: Google Scholar
  3. O. Choi, K. K. Deng, N. J. Kim, L. Ross Jr., R. Y. Surampalli, and Z. Q. Hu, “The inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and silver chloride colloids on microbial growth,” Water Research, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 3066–3074, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. K. Schluesener and H. J. Schluesener, “Nanosilver: application and novel aspects of toxicology,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 569–576, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. W. Lem, S. H. Hsu, D. S. Lee et al., “Waste minimization for the safe use of nanosilver in consumer products—its impact on the eco-product design for public health,” in Public Health—Methodology, Environmental and Systems Issues, J. Maddock, Ed., chapter 10, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. You, C. Han, X. Wang et al., “The progress of silver nanoparticles in the antibacterial mechanism, clinical application and cytotoxicity,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 9193–9201, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. F. Hansen and A. Baun, “When enough is enough,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 7, pp. 409–411, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. W. Clarkson, “Metal toxicity in the central nervous system,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 75, pp. 59–64, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  9. D. O. Carpenter, “Effects of metals on the nervous system of humans and animals,” International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 209–218, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  10. N. R. Panyala, E. M. Peña-Méndez, and J. Havel, “Silver or silver nanoparticles: a hazardous threat to the environment and human health?” Journal of Applied Biomedicine, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 117–129, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. Rungby and G. Danscher, “Hypoactivity in silver exposed mice,” Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 398–401, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. Tang, L. Xiong, S. Wang et al., “Distribution, translocation and accumulation of silver nanoparticles in rats,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 4924–4932, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. S. Sharma, S. Hussain, J. Schlager, S. F. Ali, and A. Sharma, “Influence of nanoparticles on blood-brain barrier permeability and brain edema formation in rats,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 106, pp. 359–364, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  14. H. S. Sharma and A. Sharma, “Nanoparticles aggravate heat stress induced cognitive deficits, blood-brain barrier disruption, edema formation and brain pathology,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 162, pp. 245–273, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. F. Rahman, J. Wang, T. A. Patterson et al., “Expression of genes related to oxidative stress in the mouse brain after exposure to silver-25 nanoparticles,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. H. Sung, J. H. Ji, J. D. Park et al., “Subchronic inhalation toxicity of silver nanoparticles,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 452–461, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. V. AshaRani, G. L. K. Mun, M. P. Hande, and S. Valiyaveettil, “Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. AshaRani, S. Sethu, H. K. Lim, G. Balaji, S. Valiyaveettil, and M. P. Hande, “Differential regulation of intracellular factors mediating cell cycle, DNA repair and inflammation following exposure to silver nanoparticles in human cells,” Genome Integrity, vol. 3, article 1, pp. 1–14, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. M. Hussain, A. K. Javorina, A. M. Schrand, H. M. H. M. Duhart, S. F. Ali, and J. J. Schlager, “The interaction of manganese nanoparticles with PC-12 cells induces dopamine depletion,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 456–463, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Wang, M. F. Rahman, H. M. Duhart et al., “Expression changes of dopaminergic system-related genes in PC12 cells induced by manganese, silver, or copper nanoparticles,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 926–933, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. N. Hadrup, K. Loeschner, A. Mortensen et al., “The similar neurotoxic effects of nanoparticulate and ionic silver in vivo and in vitro,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 416–423, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. M. Luther, Y. Koehler, J. Diendorf, M. Epple, and R. Dringen, “Accumulation of silver nanoparticles by cultured primary brain astrocytes,” Nanotechnology, vol. 22, no. 37, Article ID 375101, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. E. M. Luther, M. M. Schmidt, J. Diendorf, M. Epple, and R. Dringen, “Upregulation of metallothioneins after exposure of cultured primary astrocytes to silver nanoparticles,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1639–1648, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Z. Liu, G. Ren, T. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Action potential changes associated with the inhibitory effects on voltage-gated sodium current of hippocampal CA1 neurons by silver nanoparticles,” Toxicology, vol. 264, no. 3, pp. 179–184, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Z. Liu, G. Ren, T. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “The inhibitory effects of nano-Ag on voltage-gated potassium currents of hippocampal CA1 neurons,” Environmental Toxicology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 552–558, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Haase, S. Rott, A. Mantion et al., “Effects of silver nanoparticles on primary mixed neural cell cultures: uptake, oxidative stress and acute calcium responses,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 457–468, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Xu, C. Piett, S. S. Farkas, M. Qazzaz, and I. S. Naweed, “Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) cause degeneration of cytoskeleton and disrupt synaptic machinery of cultured cortical neurons,” Molecular Brain, vol. 6, article 29, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Tang, L. Xiong, G. Zhou et al., “Silver nanoparticles crossing through and distribution in the blood-brain barrier in vitro,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 6313–6317, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. W. J. Trickler, S. M. Lantz, R. C. Murdock et al., “Silver nanoparticle induced blood-brain barrier inflammation and increased permeability in primary rat brain microvessel endothelial cells,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 160–170, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. REACH, Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC.
  31. S. Creton, I. C. Dewhurst, L. K. Earl et al., “Acute toxicity testing of chemicals—opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches,” Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 50–83, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Hartung, T. Luechtefeld, A. Maertens, and A. Kleensang, “Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments,” ALTEX, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 3–18, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. Foldbjerg, D. A. Dang, and H. Autrup, “Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in the human lung cancer cell line, A549,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 743–750, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Chairuangkitti, S. Lawanprasert, S. Roytrakul et al., “Silver nanoparticles induce toxicity in A549 cells via ROS-dependent and ROS-independent pathways,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 330–338, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. J. Balmforth, S. G. Ball, R. I. Freshney, D. I. Graham, H. B. McNamee, and P. F. Vaughan, “D-1 dopaminergic and β-adrenergic stimulation of adenylate cyclase in a clone derived from the human astrocytoma cell line G-CCM,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 715–719, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  36. U. de Simone, L. Manzo, C. Ferrari, J. Bakeine, C. Locatelli, and T. Coccini, “Short and long-term exposure of CNS cell lines to BPA-f a radiosensitizer for boron neutron capture therapy: safety dose evaluation by a battery of cytotoxicity tests,” Neurotoxicology, vol. 35, pp. 84–90, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. Mosmann, “Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 55–63, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  38. K. Kawata, M. Osawa, and S. Okabe, “In vitro toxicity of silver nanoparticles at noncytotoxic doses to HepG2 human hepatoma cells,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 6046–6051, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. Cronholm, H. L. Karlsson, J. Hedberg et al., “Intracellular uptake and toxicity of Ag and CuO nanoparticles: a comparison between nanoparticles and their corresponding metal ions,” Small, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 970–982, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Herzog, A. Casey, F. M. Lyng, G. Chambers, H. J. Byrne, and M. Davoren, “A new approach to the toxicity testing of carbon-based nanomaterials—the clonogenic assay,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 174, no. 1–3, pp. 49–60, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. Gellein, S. Hoel, L. Evje, and T. Syversen, “The colony formation assay as an indicator of carbon nanotube toxicity examined in three cell lines,” Nanotoxicology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 215–221, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Grosse, L. Evje, and T. Syversen, “Silver nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity in rat brain endothelial cell culture,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 305–313, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. N. J. Maragakis and J. D. Rothstein, “Mechanisms of disease: astrocytes in neurodegenerative disease,” Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 679–689, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Hirrlinger and R. Dringen, “The cytosolic redox state of astrocytes: maintenance, regulation and functional implications for metabolite trafficking,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 177–188, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. E. Tiffany-Castiglioni, S. Hong, and Y. Qian, “Copper handling by astrocytes: insights into neurodegenerative diseases,” International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 811–818, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. V. Parpura, M. T. Heneka, V. Montana et al., “Glial cells in (patho)physiology,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 4–27, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. I. F. Scheiber and R. Dringen, “Astrocyte functions in the copper homeostasis of the brain,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 556–565, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C. Eroglu and B. A. Barres, “Regulation of synaptic connectivity by glia,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7321, pp. 223–231, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. L. Valles, “Astrocytes and the important role in the future research of brain,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinsonism, vol. 2, article e127, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. Ahamed, M. S. AlSalhi, and M. K. J. Siddiqui, “Silver nanoparticle applications and human health,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 411, no. 23-24, pp. 1841–1848, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Takenaka, E. Karg, C. Roth et al., “Pulmonary and systemic distribution of inhaled ultrafine silver particles in rats,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 547–551, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  52. S. Kittler, C. Greulich, J. Diendorf, M. Köller, and M. Epple, “Toxicity of silver nanoparticles increases during storage because of slow dissolution under release of silver ions,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 4548–4554, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Dobias and R. Bernier-Latmani, “Silver release from silver nanoparticles in natural waters,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 4140–4146, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. E. Navarro, F. Piccapietra, B. Wagner et al., “Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 23, pp. 8959–8964, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. O. Bar-Ilan, R. M. Albrecht, V. E. Fako, and D. Y. Furgeson, “Toxicity assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in Zebrafish embryos,” Small, vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 1897–1910, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. L. Kvitek, M. Vanickova, A. Panacek et al., “Initial study on the toxicity of silver nanoparticles (NPs) against Paramecium caudatum,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. 4296–4300, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Miao, K. A. Schwehr, C. Xu et al., “The algal toxicity of silver engineered nanoparticles and detoxification by exopolymeric substances,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 157, no. 11, pp. 3034–3041, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. X. Xia, J. Zeng, B. McDearmon, Y. Zheng, Q. Li, and Y. Xia, “Silver nanocrystals with concave surfaces and their optical and surface-enhanced raman scattering properties,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 50, no. 52, pp. 12542–12546, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Z. Xiu, Q. B. Zhang, H. L. Puppala, V. L. Colvin, and P. J. J. Alvarez, “Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles,” Nano Letters, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 4271–4275, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. N. Meyer, C. A. Lord, X. Y. Yang et al., “Intracellular uptake and associated toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Aquatic Toxicology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 140–150, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. N. Lubick, “Nanosilver toxicity: ions, nanoparticles—or both?” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 23, p. 8617, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. E. Park, J. Yi, Y. Kim, K. Choi, and K. Park, “Silver nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity by a Trojan-horse type mechanism,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 872–878, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. C. Carlson, S. M. Hussein, A. M. Schrand et al., “Unique cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles: size-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 112, no. 43, pp. 13608–13619, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. O. Choi and Z. Q. Hu, “Size dependent and reactive oxygen species related nanosilver toxicity to nitrifying bacteria,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 4583–4588, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. S. Kim, J. E. Choi, J. Choi et al., “Oxidative stress-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles in human hepatoma cells,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1076–1084, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. R. Foldbjerg, P. Olesen, M. Hougaard, D. A. Dang, H. J. Hoffmann, and H. Autrup, “PVP-coated silver nanoparticles and silver ions induce reactive oxygen species, apoptosis and necrosis in THP-1 monocytes,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 156–162, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H. J. Eom and J. Choi, “p38 MAPK activation, DNA damage, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis as mechanisms of toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Jurkat T cells,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 21, pp. 8337–8342, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Teresa Coccini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2358 Views | 862 Downloads | 26 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.