BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Therapeutic Potential of Natural Pharmacological Agents in the Treatment of Human Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 546353 | 12 pages |

-Mangostin Suppresses the Viability and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Downregulating the PI3K/Akt Pathway

Academic Editor: Kota V. Ramana
Received10 Feb 2014
Revised07 Mar 2014
Accepted12 Mar 2014
Published10 Apr 2014


α-Mangostin, a natural product isolated from the pericarp of the mangosteen fruit, has been shown to inhibit the growth of tumor cells in various types of cancers. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unclear. Here, we report that α-mangostin suppressed the viability and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of pancreatic cancer cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Treatment of pancreatic cancer BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells with α-mangostin resulted in loss of cell viability, accompanied by enhanced cell apoptosis, cell cycle arrest at G1 phase, and decrease of cyclin-D1. Moreover, Transwell and Matrigel invasion assays showed that α-mangostin significantly reduced the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Consistent with these results, α-mangostin decreased the expression of MMP-2, MMP-9, N-cadherin, and vimentin and increased the expression of E-cadherin. Furthermore, we found that α-mangostin suppressed the activity of the PI3K/Akt pathway in pancreatic cancer cells as demonstrated by the reduction of the Akt phosphorylation by α-mangostin. Finally, α-mangostin significantly inhibited the growth of BxPc-3 tumor mouse xenografts. Our results suggest that α-mangostin may be potentially used as a novel adjuvant therapy or complementary alternative medicine for the management of pancreatic cancers.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most malignant and lethal tumors, with an overall 5-year survival rate less than 5% [1]. The lethality of pancreatic cancer is largely due to the aggressive local invasion, metastases, and resistance to chemotherapy [2]. The poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients is closely correlated with the high proliferation and metastasis of tumour cells. Gemcitabine has been the standard first-line drug for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer since 1996, but it provides only a modest benefit to patients owing to the problems such as acquired chemoresistance and multiple adverse effects [3]. It is therefore clear that there is an urgent need to develop drugs that are more effective and have less toxicity compared to gemcitabine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Mangosteen, a well-known tropical fruit, is native to Thailand and other tropical countries [4]. The purple pericarp of Mangosteen contains lots of healthy nutrients and pharmacologically active compounds, including xanthones, terpenes, anthocyanins, tannins, and phenols [5]. Since long time ago, the pericarp of this fruit has been used as a native drug by Southeast Asians to treat diseases, such as skin infections and wounds, amoebic dysentery, diarrhoea, and cholera [6]. In recent years, commercial products comprised of mangosteen, multiple vitamins and minerals, green tea, and other natural extracts are being widely recommended to cancer patients as a dietary supplement [7]. Although there is no sufficient clinical evidence that mangosteen could suppress the growth of tumors or reduce the incidence of malignancies, the commercial products are one of the best-selling botanical dietary supplements [8].

A class of compounds known as xanthones isolated from mangosteen possess a wide range of biological activities including anti-inflammatory [9, 10], neuroprotective [11], cardioprotective [12, 13], and antioxidant activity [7, 14, 15]. α-Mangostin is one of the major bioactive and most abundant xanthones derived from mangosteen [16]. α-Mangostin, as a chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic bioactive compound, has been widely investigated [17]. It was shown that α-mangostin has a potential inhibitory effect on several carcinomas. It could induce cycle arrest of cancer cell [18], inhibit cell viability [19], induce apoptosis and differentiation [20], reduce inflammation, and decrease adhesion [2123], invasion [24], and metastasis of cancer cells [23, 25]. However, the underlying pharmacology of its antitumor effect is largely unknown.

In this study, we have investigated the effects of α-mangostin on the cell viability and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells. We have also explored the underlying potential molecular mechanisms and found that the PI3K/Akt pathway was inhibited by α-mangostin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

α-Mangostin (purity > 98%) was obtained from Sigma (CA, USA) and dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; St. Louis, MO, USA) at the stock concentration of 100 mM. Recombinant human TGF-β1 was purchased from Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology (Beijing, China). Millicell culture plate inserts and Matrigel were purchased from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA). Antibodies against Bcl-2 or β-actin were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); anticleaved caspase-3, cyclin-D3, cyclin-D1, Akt, and phospho-Akt (Ser473) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology; anti-MMP-2 and anti-MMP-9 antibodies were from Proteintech (USA); antibodies against E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin were procured from Bioworld (Minneapolis, MN, USA).

2.2. Cell Culture

BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells were purchased from Chinese Academy of Sciences Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection (CBTCCCAS); hTERT-HPNE cell was purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA) and cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM/High Glucose) (HyClone, Logan, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone, Logan, USA), 100 μg/mL ampicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin.

2.3. Cell Viability Assay

BxPc-3, Panc-1, and hTERT-HPNE cells at 50–60% confluency were cultured in medium supplemented with 1% FBS for 24 h to get synchronized G1 phase cells, plated into 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well, and incubated overnight in medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells were then treated with various concentrations of α-mangostin in 0.1% DMSO or with 0.1% DMSO alone as control. Following incubation for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h at 37°C, relative cell viability was quantified by MTT assay as previously reported [26]. 20 μL of 5 mg/mL MTT (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added into each well after media were removed and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Then, 150 μL DMSO was added to each well and the optical density (OD) was measured at 492 nm on a Multifunction Microplate Reader (POLARstar OPTIMA; BMG, Offenburg, Germany). The proliferation inhibition rate was calculated according to the equation: proliferation inhibition rate = () × 100%.

2.4. Cell Cycle Analysis

Cells (1 × 105 cells/mL) were seeded in six-well plates coated with 1% gelatin and allowed to grow to 80% confluency. Then, the media were replaced with fresh media containing various different concentrations of α-mangostin. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were fixed in 70% alcohol for 30 min on ice. Cells were treated with RNase A (Sigma) at 37°C and stained with propidium iodide in the dark for 30 min. DNA content was assayed on a FACSCalibur (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and cell cycle analysis was conducted using CellQuest software.

2.5. Apoptosis Assay

Apoptosis was assessed with an Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) according manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were seeded (105/well) in 6-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS. Twenty-four hours later, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing various concentrations of α-mangostin. After additional 24 h, cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and stained with Annexin V and propidium iodide in the dark. The percentage of apoptotic cells was quantified by flow cytometry.

2.6. Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Cell invasion and migration assay were performed using Transwell chambers (Millipore) as previously described [27]. The 8 μm pore inserts were coated with or without Matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich) for invasion or migration assays. Cell suspensions containing 1% FBS (200 μL, 5 × 104 cells) were seeded into the upper chamber and 500 μL DMEM containing 20% FBS was added in the lower chamber. Noninvading cells were removed with a cotton-tipped swab after 24 h incubation, and the invading cells on the bottom surface of membrane were stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The invading cell numbers were quantified by counting 10 random fields at ×200 magnification.

2.7. Western Blotting

Total proteins were extracted by RIPA Lysis Buffer (Beyotime, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Western blotting was performed as previously described [28]. In brief, proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Roche). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-Buffered Saline and Tween 20 (TBST) at room temperature for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti-Bcl-2, anticleaved caspase-3, anti-cyclin-D3, anti-cyclin-D1, anti-MMP-2 and anti-MMP-9. After incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature, immunoreactive bands were developed by enhanced chemiluminescence. β-Actin was stained as loading control.

2.8. Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted by Fastgen200 RNA isolation system (Fastgen, Shanghai, China) as the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Dalian, China). qRT-PCR was conducted using the iQ5 Multi-color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Dalian, China) as previously described to quantify mRNA levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin [29]. The comparative C (T) method was used to quantitate the expression of each target gene using β-actin as the normalization control. The PCR primer sequences for MMP-2, MMP-9, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, and β-actin are listed in Supplemental Information Table S1 (see Supplemental Information Table S1 available online in Supplementary Materials at

2.9. Subcutaneous Xenografts In Vivo

Male BALb/c nude mice were purchased and housed in the Animal Center at Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University. Twenty animals were randomly divided into four groups, with five animals in each group. The animals in group 1 received vehicle (100 μL saline) by oral gavage and served as control. The animals in groups 2 and 3 received α-mangostin suspension (dissolved in 100 μL saline and 50 or 100 mg/kg) by oral gavage five times weekly [18]. Body weights were recorded once weekly throughout the study. According to the previous report [27], 2 × 106 cells (100 μL) in a 50% Matrigel mixture were injected subcutaneously in nude mice at four to six weeks old. The dimensions, length (), and width () of the tumors were measured with Vernier calipers every 3 days. Tumor volume was calculated using the equation . The mice were euthanized 30 days after the subcutaneous injection.

2.10. Ethics Statement

All in vivo experimental protocols were evaluated and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of College of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was performed at least for three times. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Differences were evaluated using a Student’s -test, with considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Treatment with α-Mangostin Results in Loss of Viability of Pancreatic Cancer Cells

To investigate the effect of α-mangostin on the viability of pancreatic cancer cells, we treated BxPc-3, Panc-1, and hTERT-HPNE cells (normal human pancreatic ductal epithelial cell) with different concentrations of α-mangostin (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 32 μM) for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h and assessed cell viability by the MTT assay. Treatment with α-mangostin at concentrations of more than 8 μM significantly reduced the viability of both cancer cell lines in a time-dependent manner () (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)); however, limited inhibitory effect on hTERT-HPNE cells was observed (Figure 1(c)). Treatment with 32 μM α-mangostin resulted in more than 80% loss of cell viability in both pancreatic cancer cell lines and 50% in hTERT-HPNE cells after 48 h.

3.2. α-Mangostin Induces Apoptosis of Pancreatic Cancer Cells

To address the underlying mechanism of the inhibitory effect of α-mangostin on pancreatic cancer cell viability, we measured α-mangostin-induced apoptosis in BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells by flow cytometry. As shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), treatment with 8 μM α-mangostin resulted in increased early (Annexin V-FITC) and late (PI) apoptotic cells compared to untreated controls. Notably, when compared to the untreated group, more than 30% cells of both of the cell lines underwent apoptosis following treatment of 16 μM α-mangostin (Figures 2(a) and 2(b), ). Consistent with these results, immunoblots demonstrated that α-mangostin caused a dose-dependent reduction in the antiapoptosis Bcl-2 protein levels and an increase in the levels of cleaved of caspase-3, a marker of cell apoptosis (Figure 2(c)). These results clearly demonstrate that α-mangostin induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells.

3.3. α-Mangostin Induces Cell Cycle Arrest at the G1/G0 Phase in Pancreatic Cancer Cells

Most drugs inhibit cell growth and promote cell apoptosis through inducing cell cycle arrest. To test whether α-mangostin induces cell cycle arrest of pancreatic cancer cells, we treated BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells with different concentrations of α-mangostin for 24 h and performed cell cycle analysis by PI/flow cytometry. As shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), pancreatic cancer cells treated with 8 μM α-mangostin significantly accumulated in the G1/G0 phase, while there were more cells in G1/G0 phase after treatment with 16 μM α-mangostin. In consistence, α-mangostin treatment led to a reduction of cells in S and G2/M phases (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). The increase of G1/G0 phase in conjunction with the decrease of S and G2/M phases suggests that the reduction of cell viability may be due at least in part to the induction of cell cycle arrest by α-mangostin.

Cyclin D-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are the main drivers for the transition of cells from G1 to S phase. Indeed, in BxPc-3 cells, 8 μM α-mangostin slightly and 16 μM α-mangostin markedly reduced the protein level of cyclin-D1 after 24 h of treatment (Figure 3(c)). In Panc-1 cells, 8 μM and 16 μM α-mangostin dramatically decreased the protein level of cyclin-D1 (Figure 3(c)). In both cell lines, the effects of α-mangostin on the protein levels of cyclin-D3 were marginal. These results indicate that α-mangostin inhibits cell cycle progression by downregulating cyclin-D1.

3.4. α-Mangostin Inhibits the Migration and Invasion of Pancreatic Cancer Cells

To evaluate the effect of α-mangostin on pancreatic cancer cell migration, we performed Transwell assays and found that α-mangostin at concentrations of 8 μM and 16 μM significantly inhibited the migration of BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells (Figure 4(a)). Next, we assessed the effect of α-mangostin on pancreatic cancer cell invasion using a Matrigel invasion assay. α-Mangostin significantly suppressed the ability of these cells to invade through the Matrigel in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4(b)). Moreover, α-mangostin reduced both the mRNA (Figure 5(a)) and protein levels (Figure 5(b)) of MMP-2 and MMP-9, which play critical roles in migration, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells. These observations demonstrate that α-mangostin inhibits the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro.

3.5. α-Mangostin Modulates the Expression of EMT-Related Genes in Pancreatic Cancer Cells

The inhibition of cell migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells suggests that α-mangostin may affect EMT of cancer cells. To test this, we measured the expression of EMT related-genes by immunoblotting and qRT-PCR. α-Mangostin treatment of both BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in the protein levels of the epithelial marker E-cadherin and a decrease in the protein levels of the mesenchymal markers vimentin and N-cadherin (Figure 5(a)). Similar alteration of the mRNA levels of these corresponding genes by α-mangostin was also observed (Figure 5(b)). These results further support the observation that α-mangostin has an inhibitory effect on the acquisition of mesenchymal-like characteristics by pancreatic cancer cells and consequently suppresses their capacity for dissemination and invasion.

3.6. α-Mangostin Suppresses the Activation of the PI3K/Akt Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer Cells

The PI3K/Akt pathway, one of the predominant cell growth-promoting signaling pathways, enhances cell proliferation mainly by increasing D-type cyclins. The arrest of cell cycle in the G1 phase and downregulation of cyclin-D1 (Figure 3) suggest that α-mangostin may downregulate the activity of the PI3K/Akt pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the phosphorylation of Akt at ser473 by immunoblotting of BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells treated with α-mangostin. Our results revealed that α-mangostin reduced the phosphorylation of Akt at ser473 (Figure 6(a)). We also observed that Akt phosphorylation was significantly decreased after treatment with the α-mangostin in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)).

The deregulation of PI3K/Akt pathway is associated with enhanced cell migration, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that TGF-β induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition through the activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway [30]. These facts led us to hypothesize that α-mangostin may suppress the migration, invasion, and EMT in pancreatic cancer cells through dampening the PI3K/Akt pathway. We therefore compared the TGF-β-induced phosphorylation of Akt and upregulation of EMT-related genes [31] in BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β [31] with or without 16 μM of α-mangostin. While TGF-β enhanced the phosphorylation of Akt and the expression of vimentin and N-cadherin, these TGF-β-induced effects were significantly abolished by α-mangostin (Figure 6(b)). These results demonstrate that α-mangostin induces multiple biological effects in pancreatic cancer cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.

3.7. α-Mangostin Suppresses the Growth of Human Pancreatic Cancer BxPc-3 Cells In Vivo

To extend our in vitro observations to the in vivo context, we conducted in vivo tumor xenograftexperiments. BALb/c nude mice were implanted with BxPc-3 cells and divided into three cohorts, one of which received vehicle and the others α-mangostin (50 or 100 mg/kg). We found a dramatic difference in the growth of tumor xenografts with 50 mg/kg α-mangostin, and more significant inhibitory effect of 100 mg/kg was observed (; Figure 7(a)). The average tumor volume of the group treated with α-mangostin was significantly lower on day 30 after tumor cell injection compared with that of the control group (Figure 7(b)). No differences in body weights were found between the mice with or without α-mangostin during the study. These data showed that α-mangostin suppresses the growth of tumor xenografts derived from pancreatic cancer cells and has no harmful effects on the animals.

4. Discussion

In this study, we observed that α-mangostin inhibited cell viability and induced cell apoptosis, which were accompanied by the activation of caspase-3 and decreased levels of Bcl-2 in BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells. Moreover, α-mangostin promoted cell cycle arrest and inhibited cell invasion, which were associated with the decreased expression of cyclin-D and MMPs. Furthermore, we found that α-mangostin suppressed the EMT progression and activity of the PI3K/Akt pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. The subcutaneous tumor xenograft model showed that the oral administration of α-mangostin resulted in significant suppression of the growth of tumor xenografts in nude mice. Our findings suggest that α-mangostin is a potential drug for adjuvant therapy or a complementary alternative medicine for the management of pancreatic cancers.

Despite great advances in modern medicine during the past two decades, pancreatic cancer is still associated with an extremely high mortality rate (approaching 100%) [2]. Currently, Gemcitabine is considered as a first-line drug for pancreatic cancer, but its efficacy is still disappointing [32] and the pancreatic cancer survival has not improved substantially over the past 25 years. Recently, the dietary and synthetic agents purported to possess greater efficacy and lower toxicity have attracted great attention for the prevention and treatment of pancreatic cancer [33].

Previous studies showed that α-mangostin could inhibit the growth and induce the apoptosis of human prostate cancer [18] and colon cancer [34] cells. Similarly, we found that α-mangostin inhibited the proliferation and induced apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner, but limited inhibitory effect on the normal human pancreatic ductal epithelial cell was observed. The caspase-3 cascade is activated by proapoptotic molecules such as cytochrome c when released from mitochondria and is inhibited by antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 proteins. We demonstrated that α-mangostin promoted the activation of caspase-3 but decreased Bcl-2, suggesting that α-mangostin may potentially act on mitochondria and induce apoptosis.

α-Mangostin has been previously reported to induce cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells [35] and colon cancer cells [34]. Consistent with these studies, our results demonstrated that α-mangostin significantly inhibited the ability of cells to transit from G1 to the S phase. The transition from the G1 phase to S phase is an important cell cycle control point. Cyclin-D1 is a critical cell cycle regulatory molecule and is required for the cell cycle progression through G1 to S phase [36]. The growth stimulatory signals received by the cells in the early stage of G1 phase increase the levels of cyclin-D1. It was reported that α-mangostin for 24 h suppressed cyclin-D1 which was followed by apoptosis in prostate cancer cells [18]. In agreement with this report, we observed that α-mangostin promoted cell cycle arrest at G1 phase and downregulated cyclin-D1 in BxPc-3 and Panc-1 cells. These results indicate that the inhibitory effect of α-mangostin on the pancreatic cancer cell might be due to the downregulation of cyclin-D1 expression and a consequent delay in the G1/S transition.

Migratory and invasive abilities are important characteristics of metastatic cancer cells. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition is the process wherein epithelial cells acquire fibroblast-like properties and exhibit reduced cell-cell adhesion and increased motility. During oncogenesis, EMT may endow cancer cells with enhanced motility and invasiveness. Recent studies showed that α-mangostin could inhibit the metastasis and invasion in skin, prostrate, breast, and lung [25]. In the present study, α-mangostin was demonstrated to decrease the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. In addition, we found that α-mangostin modulated the expressions of invasion-related (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and EMT-associated (E-cadherin, vimentin and N-cadherin) genes. Our results suggest that α-mangostin may inhibit migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells by downregulating MMPs and inhibiting EMT progression.

Dysregulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway is quite common in PDAC. Up to 60% of PDAC tissues and most PDAC cell lines exhibit increased AKT activity [37]. The serine/threonine kinase Akt, the most studied signaling molecule downstream of PI3K, is involved in the stimulation of cell proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, alteration of the cell cycle, and promotion of invasiveness as well as induction of EMT [3840]. These findings prompted us to hypothesize that the biological action of α-mangostin may be mediated via PI3K/Akt pathway. Our results showed that α-mangostin reduced the basal activity of Akt and abolished the TGF-β-induced Akt phosphorylation.

The anticancer potential of α-mangostin was further supported by our in vivo studies that involve generation of subcutaneous xenograft tumors derived from pancreatic cancer cells in nude mice. A previous study showed that pretreatment of rats with α-mangostin (200 mg/kg body wt.) orally for up to 8 days had no observable adverse effects in solid organ systems [13]. Another report demonstrated that F344 rats fed with custom-blended food pellets that contained 0.02 or 0.05% α-mangostin for 5 weeks also showed no apparent adverse effects [41]. In addition, mangosteen that contains abundant amounts of α-mangostin is widely consumed by humans in the form of juices, dietary supplements, and fruit [18]. Therefore, the anticancer activity of α-mangostin suggests that α-mangostin has the potential to be a novel adjuvant therapy or complementary alternative medicine for the management of pancreatic cancer.

5. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that α-mangostin suppressed the proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as EMT of pancreatic cancer cells. These multiple biological effects might result from the suppression of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by α-mangostin. These results suggest that α-mangostin is a potential anticancer agent for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Qinhong Xu and Jiguang Ma contributed equally to this work.


This study was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81201824 and 81172360), the Clinical Innovation Funds of the 1st Affiliated Hospital of XJTU (12ZD05, 13ZD04, and 13ZD17), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in Xi’an Jiaotong University (2013).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table S1: PCR Primer Sequences for Human β-Actin, CXCL12, CXCR4, NGF, uPA, MMP-2 and Rat CXCL12, CXCR4.

  1. Supplementary Table


  1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2012,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 10–29, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Bosetti, P. Bertuccio, E. Negri, C. La Vecchia, M. P. Zeegers, and P. Boffetta, “Pancreatic cancer: overview of descriptive epidemiology,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. A. Tempero, J. P. Arnoletti, S. W. Behrman et al., “Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 2.2012: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 703–713, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. Pedraza-Chaverri, N. Cárdenas-Rodríguez, M. Orozco-Ibarra, and J. M. Pérez-Rojas, “Medicinal properties of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana),” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 3227–3239, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y.-W. Chin, H.-A. Jung, H. Chai, W. J. Keller, and A. D. Kinghorn, “Xanthones with quinone reductase-inducing activity from the fruits of Garcinia mangostana (Mangosteen),” Phytochemistry, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 754–758, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Nakamura, Y. Qu, F. Xu, H. Matsuda, and M. Yoshikawa, “Structures of new monoterpenes from Thai herbal medicine Curcuma comosa,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1604–1606, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Kondo, L. Zhang, H. Ji, Y. Kou, and B. Ou, “Bioavailability and antioxidant effects of a xanthone-rich mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) product in humans,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 19, pp. 8788–8792, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. Marcason, “What are the facts and myths about mangosteen,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 106, no. 6, p. 986, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. T. Chomnawang, S. Surassmo, V. S. Nukoolkarn, and W. Gritsanapan, “Effect of Garcinia mangostana on inflammation caused by Propionibacterium acnes,” Fitoterapia, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 401–408, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L.-G. Chen, L.-L. Yang, and C.-C. Wang, “Anti-inflammatory activity of mangostins from Garcinia mangostana,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 688–693, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Pedraza-Chaverrí, L. M. Reyes-Fermín, E. G. Nolasco-Amaya et al., “ROS scavenging capacity and neuroprotective effect of α-mangostin against 3-nitropropionic acid in cerebellar granule neurons,” Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 491–501, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. P. Devi and K. Vijayaraghavan, “Cardioprotective effect of alpha-mangostin, a xanthone derivative from mangosteen on tissue defense system against isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in rats,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 336–339, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  13. P. D. Sampath and K. Vijayaragavan, “Ameliorative prospective of alpha-mangostin, a xanthone derivative from Garcinia mangostana against β-adrenergic cathecolamine-induced myocardial toxicity and anomalous cardiac TNF-α and COX-2 expressions in rats,” Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 60, no. 4-5, pp. 357–364, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Sun, S. Zhang, Y. Wei, and L. Yin, “Antioxidant activity of mangostin in cell-free system and its effect on K562 leukemia cell line in photodynamic therapy,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1033–1043, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Márquez-Valadez, R. Lugo-Huitrón, V. Valdivia-Cerda et al., “The natural xanthone α-mangostin reduces oxidative damage in rat brain tissue,” Nutritional Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Obolskiy, I. Pischel, N. Siriwatanametanon, and M. Heinrich, “Garcinia mangostana L.: a phytochemical and pharmacological review,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1047–1065, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Shan, Q. Ma, K. Guo et al., “Xanthones from mangosteen extracts as natural chemopreventive agents: potential anticancer drugs,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 666–677, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. J. Johnson, S. M. Petiwala, D. N. Syed et al., “α-mangostin, a xanthone from mangosteen fruit, promotes cell cycle arrest in prostate cancer and decreases xenograft tumor growth,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 413–419, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. F. A. Aisha, K. M. Abu-Salah, Z. Ismail, and A. M. S. A. Majid, “α-Mangostin enhances betulinic acid cytotoxicity and inhibits cisplatin cytotoxicity on HCT 116 colorectal carcinoma cells,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 2939–2954, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Krajarng, S. Nilwarankoon, S. Suksamrarn, and R. Watanapokasin, “Antiproliferative effect of α-mangostin on canine osteosarcoma cells,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 788–794, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S.-H. Hung, K.-H. Shen, C.-H. Wu, C.-L. Liu, and Y.-W. Shih, “α-Mangostin suppresses PC-3 human prostate carcinoma cell metastasis by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 and urokinase-plasminogen expression through the JNK signaling pathway,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1291–1298, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A.-R. Han, J.-A. Kim, D. D. Lantvit et al., “Cytotoxic xanthone constituents of the stem bark of Garcinia mangostana (mangosteen),” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 2028–2031, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M.-A. Shibata, M. Iinuma, J. Morimoto et al., “α-Mangostin extracted from the pericarp of the mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana Linn) reduces tumor growth and lymph node metastasis in an immunocompetent xenograft model of metastatic mammary cancer carrying a p53 mutation,” BMC Medicine, vol. 9, article 69, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Yuan, Y. Wu, and G. Lu, “alpha-Mangostin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced invasion by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 and increasing E-cadherin expression through extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling in pancreatic cancer cells,” Oncology Letters, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1958–1964, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  25. J. J. Wang, B. J. Sanderson, and W. Zhang, “Significant anti-invasive activities of alpha-mangostin from the mangosteen pericarp on two human skin cancer cell lines,” Anticancer Research, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 3805–3816, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  26. T. Tian, K.-J. Nan, S.-H. Wang et al., “PTEN regulates angiogenesis and VEGF expression through phosphatase-dependent and -independent mechanisms in HepG2 cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1211–1219, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Guo, Y. Lv, T. Tian et al., “Downregulation of p57 accelerates the growth and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 32, no. 12, Article ID bgr220, pp. 1897–1904, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Lei, J. Ma, Q. Ma et al., “Hedgehog signaling regulates hypoxia induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and invasion in pancreatic cancer cells via a ligand-independent manner,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 12, article 66, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  29. K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Lamouille and R. Derynck, “Cell size and invasion in TGF-β-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition is regulated by activation of the mTOR pathway,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 178, no. 3, pp. 437–451, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. Li, J. Ma, Q. Ma et al., ““Resveratrol inhibits the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer cells via suppression of the PI-3K/Akt/NF-kappaB pathway,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 33, pp. 4185–4194, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. M. Di, C. R. Cicilia, M. Macchini et al., “Metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the best standard treatment? (review),” Oncology Reports, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1183–1192, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. D. Stan, S. V. Singh, and R. E. Brand, “Chemoprevention strategies for pancreatic cancer,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 347–356, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y. Mizushina, I. Kuriyama, T. Nakahara, Y. Kawashima, and H. Yoshida, “Inhibitory effects of α-mangostin on mammalian DNA polymerase, topoisomerase, and human cancer cell proliferation,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 59, pp. 793–800, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Kurose, M. A. Shibata, M. Iinuma, and Y. Otsuki, “Alterations in cell cycle and induction of apoptotic cell death in breast cancer cells treated with alpha-mangostin extracted from mangosteen pericarp,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 672428, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Deshpande, P. Sicinski, and P. W. Hinds, “Cyclins and cdks in development and cancer: a perspective,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 2909–2915, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Arlt, S. S. Muerkoster, and H. Schafer, “Targeting apoptosis pathways in pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Letters, vol. 332, no. 2, pp. 346–358, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. Tanno, S. Tanno, Y. Mitsuuchi, D. A. Altomare, G.-H. Xiao, and J. R. Testa, “AKT activation up-regulates insulin-like growth factor I receptor expression and promotes invasiveness of human pancreatic cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 589–593, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. J. Grille, A. Bellacosa, J. Upson et al., “The protein kinase Akt induces epithelial mesenchymal transition and promotes enhanced motility and invasiveness of squamous cell carcinoma lines,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 2172–2178, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  40. M. Cheung and J. R. Testa, “Diverse mechanisms of AKT pathway activation in human malignancy,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 234–244, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. Nabandith, M. Suzui, T. Morioka et al., “Inhibitory effects of crude alpha-mangostin, a xanthone derivative, on two different categories of colon preneoplastic lesions induced by 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine in the rat,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 433–438, 2004. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Qinhong Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1628 Views | 934 Downloads | 42 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder