BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Recent Developments of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors as Potential Drugs

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 638902 |

Vaida Morkūnaitė, Lina Baranauskienė, Asta Zubrienė, Visvaldas Kairys, Jekaterina Ivanova, Pēteris Trapencieris, Daumantas Matulis, "Saccharin Sulfonamides as Inhibitors of Carbonic Anhydrases I, II, VII, XII, and XIII", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 638902, 9 pages, 2014.

Saccharin Sulfonamides as Inhibitors of Carbonic Anhydrases I, II, VII, XII, and XIII

Academic Editor: Vincenzo Alterio
Received28 Feb 2014
Revised28 Apr 2014
Accepted28 May 2014
Published03 Sep 2014


A series of modified saccharin sulfonamides have been designed as carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitors and synthesized. Their binding to CA isoforms I, II, VII, XII, and XIII was measured by the fluorescent thermal shift assay (FTSA) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Saccharin bound the CAs weakly, exhibiting the affinities of 1–10 mM for four CAs except CA I where binding could not be detected. Several sulfonamide-bearing saccharines exhibited strong affinities of 1–10 nM towards particular CA isoforms. The functional group binding Gibbs free energy additivity maps are presented which may provide insights into the design of compounds with increased affinity towards selected CAs.

1. Introduction

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) belong to the lyase family of enzymes and catalyze the reversible reaction of carbon dioxide hydration to bicarbonate ion and proton. There are 15 CA isoforms in human body: twelve of them are catalytically active [13], while three are inactive (CAs VIII, X, and XI). The CA is linked to many diseases such as edema, glaucoma, epilepsy, and cancer. Therefore, CA is an important target for pharmaceutical research [4].

Heterocyclic sulfonamides are the most investigated CA inhibitors. Among them, saccharines play a special role, because they already contain the sulfonamide functionality in the heterocyclic system. Therefore, saccharin itself has shown some binding capacity to several CA isoforms. Saccharin has been previously described as a selective inhibitor of CA IX and CA XII at submicromolar level [5, 6]. The bovine CA II and human erythrocyte CAs I and II have been shown to be inhibited by saccharin [7, 8]. Furthermore, 20 newly prepared N-substituted saccharines have been shown to exhibit higher selective binding to CA IX and CA XII isoforms than saccharin itself [9]. Here, we describe the binding properties of saccharin sulfonamides [10] as CA inhibitors. They exhibited good inhibition properties.

The dissociation constants of synthesized compounds to five CA isoforms (I, II, VII, XII, and XIII) were determined by the fluorescent thermal shift assay (FTSA) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) methods. FTSA (also called ThermoFluor, differential scanning fluorimetry, DSF) [1117] is a rapid screening method that requires low amounts of protein and is based on the shift of protein melting temperature () that occurs upon ligand binding. The is determined by the change of the fluorescence signal observed upon heat-induced protein unfolding. Isothermal titration calorimetry directly determines the dissociation constant and also the enthalpy and entropy of binding. The enthalpy and entropy are not the subject of this paper. Furthermore, ITC requires larger amounts of protein compared to FTSA and cannot determine very weak or too tight binding. However, these two independent methods complement each other for better accuracy of interaction measurements.

2. Results

2.1. Binding Results

The binding of four saccharin sulfonamides (including saccharin itself, chemical structures shown in Figure 1) to five isoforms of human recombinant catalytic domains of carbonic anhydrases (CAs) was determined by the fluorescent thermal shift assay (FTSA) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Figure 2 shows an example of the FTSA data compounds 1, 3, and 4 binding to CA XIII. Figures 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) show the thermal denaturation curves of CA XIII in the presence of various saccharin 1 and saccharin sulfonamides 3 and 4 concentrations. There was no shift of the melting temperature when saccharin was added to 200 μM concentration (Figures 2(a) and 2(d)). The shift became visible only at higher saccharin concentrations (see Figure 3(a)). However, the shift was significant for the saccharin sulfonamides 3 and 4 (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). Figure 2(d) shows the dosing curves and the melting temperatures as a function of added compound concentrations. Lines were simulated as described in Materials and Methods.

Figure 3 shows the dosing curves of the least potent compound 1 (saccharin) and the most potent compound 4 binding to all five tested CA isoforms. There is weak shift exhibited by saccharin (1) only at highest concentrations around 1–10 mM, while a significant shift of the melting temperature with compound 4 was observed. However, visual comparison of the affinities is complicated because the melting temperatures of all five CA isoforms are different, varying from about 49°C (CA VII) through 58°C (CAs I and XIII).

The observed dissociation constants s for all four compounds binding to the five CA isoforms as determined by the FTSA are listed in Table 1. Saccharin sulfonamide derivatives bound CAs with nanomolar affinities. The affinity of compound 4 reached 330 pM for CA I and 25 nM for CA XII (Table 1). Compound 2, however, exhibited weakest binding of the three saccharin sulfonamides. Its affinity for CA I was only about 3.0 μM but reached about 200 nM for CA XIII.

CompoundDissociation constants (nM) and CA isoforms

1 (saccharin)>10,000,0002,900,0001,000,0005,900,0002,000,000

Uncertainties of the FTSA measurements are approximately 1.6-fold in .

Saccharin has been previously demonstrated to inhibit numerous CAs, especially CA VII. Our results confirm that CA VII bound saccharin most strongly of the five tested isoforms. However, our determined dissociation constants are in the range of about 1–10 mM and thus are significantly weaker than some previously determined affinities. The FTSA determined that CA VII bound saccharin with the of 1.0 mM; CA XIII, 2.0 mM; CA II, 2.9 mM; CA XII, 5.9 mM; and CA I did not exhibit any detectable shift up to 7.5 mM added saccharin; thus, its is weaker than 10 mM.

In order to confirm the FTSA measurements, all four compounds binding to five CA isoforms were also measured by the isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Figure 4 shows representative ITC data of compound 2 binding to CA II and CA XIII and saccharin binding to CA II. The ITC data for all compounds and CAs are listed in Table 2. Dissociation constants obtained by ITC were essentially confirming the FTSA results. However, the most potent compounds that exhibited affinity stronger than 20 nM by FTSA bound too tight to CA for accurate determination by ITC. As described in [13], the Wiseman factor must be between 10 and 100 for precise determination by ITC (could be still determined in the range of 5–1000 with lower accuracy). In titrations of compound 4 with CAs I, II, and VII, the value surpassed 1000. Therefore, such determinations could not be confirmed by ITC. Saccharin itself did not exhibit any binding by ITC as seen in Figure 4(c).

CompoundDissociation constants (nM) and CA isoforms


Uncertainties of the ITC measurements are approximately 2.0-fold in .

Dissociation constants were recalculated to the Gibbs free energies of binding in order to make easy comparison between different compound structures in the order of increasing affinities. Figure 5 shows such Gibbs free energy additivity scheme for all five CA isoforms. The addition of the alkyne group (compound 3 versus 2) significantly strengthened the binding to CAs I, II, VII, and XIII but not towards CA XII. However, consecutive replacement of the alkyne group with the phenyl group (compound 4) increased the binding affinity towards all five CAs. The energetic contribution was greatest for CA I (−14.5 and −24.8 kJ/mol, resp.). Compound 4 exhibited the largest affinities towards all five CA isoforms. However, affinity itself does not automatically increase selectivity towards a particular CA isoform. Selectivity towards a particular CA isoform is often a goal for a drug that would not have side effects by inhibiting a nondesired isoform. These Gibbs free energy diagrams helped design a very potent compound 4 that is also quite selective towards CA I isoform.

2.2. Docking Results

To explore the ligand-protein interactions for the complexes which did not have available X-ray structures, compounds 3 and 4 were docked in the active site of CA II using Vdock docking program [18, 19]. Here, we assumed that sulfonamide group is bound to the active site zinc as is indicated from the binding results. Furthermore, similar to our previous study [20], we used constrained docking to achieve reasonable results. A spatial constraint was imposed on the zinc-bound nitrogen to mimic a strong coordination between the zinc and sulfonamide nitrogen. An additional constraint was imposed on the sulfur-benzene ring bond torsional angle to maintain the correct rotamer. The main reason for the torsional constraints was an apparent lack of correct torsional potentials for the bond connecting the bulk of ligand with the sulfonamide group [21, 22].

The preliminary docking showed that the benzene ring had a strong tendency towards aligning with the sulfonamide S–N bond, while a visual inspection of the structures available in the PDB showed that many structures are staggered or nearly aligned with one of the S=O bonds. To verify this, we performed a survey of the available PDB [23] structures. A search revealed 115 CA structures with 124 ligand conformations in which the active center zinc-bound sulfanilamide group is attached to a benzene ring with both hydrogen substituents at the orthoposition. We explored the statistics of the torsional angles that the benzene ring plane makes with respect to the sulfonamide oxygens. The vast majority of the angles were in a narrow range characterized by an approximately staggered conformation on one end and an eclipsed rotamer in which the benzene ring was aligned with one of the S=O bonds on the other end of the range. Out of the 124 ligand conformations, there were only five outliers (PDB ID: 3ca2, 3b4f, 3nj9, 3p3h, and 3p3j) in which the benzene ring was aligned with the sulfonamide nitrogen. These five ligands are characterized by bulky substituents at the meta- or paraposition of the benzene ring. Because of the small number of the outliers and because of a small size of compounds 3 and 4, we felt these outliers can be rather safely not taken into statistics for our purposes. Among the rest of the 119 ligand conformations, the average torsion angle between the S=O and the plane of the benzene ring was 14.7° (σ = 7.8°).

Based on the findings, we chose as a reference a compound having a similar ring structure to 3-4, indane-5-sulfonamide ligand (PDB ID: 2qoa) [24] with O=S–C–C torsion angle 18.0°, which is close to the average described above. A ±15° constraint around the indane-5-sulfonamide value was imposed on the corresponding dihedral angles of 3-4 during the docking. The docking results are shown in Figure 6. The hydrophobic tails of the ligands 3-4 lie in the hydrophobic groove framed by residues Phe131, Val135, Pro202, and Leu204. The side chain of Thr200 forms the hydrogen bonds with the sulfonyl oxygens in the thiazole ring of 3 and 4.

Compounds 3-4 were also docked into CA XII (PDB ID: 1jd0 [25]) to possibly rationalize a relatively poor binding of 3 and 4 compared to CA II. Somewhat unexpectedly, these two compounds docked in a reverse binding mode compared to CA II: in CA XII the benzothiazole ring of these ligands is flipped (Figure 6(b)). In the reverse binding mode, one of the oxygen atoms of the sulfonyl group in the thiazole ring forms a hydrogen bond with Gln92 side chain. However, this hydrogen bond is likely to be much weaker compared to the complex with CA II because the hydrogen bond length is larger by more than 0.4 Å in the complex with CA XII as compared to CA II.

3. Discussion

Sulfonamides are the most investigated inhibitors of carbonic anhydrases. Primary SO2NH2 group binds to zinc atom in the active site and inhibits the protein catalytic activity. However, it is desirable to make compounds that would be good inhibitors of selected CA isoforms and would not bear the sulfonamide group. One such compound is saccharin that was previously shown to be a potent and quite selective inhibitor towards selected CA isoforms [5]. Furthermore, the crystal structure of saccharin bound to CA II has been determined.

This study confirmed that saccharin bound four of the tested five CA isoforms by direct biophysical techniques such as the fluorescent thermal shift assay. Interestingly, the binding of saccharin modified with sulfonamide group exhibited strong binding to all tested CA isoforms. Saccharin binding was carefully measured several times and could be detected for any of the tested CA isoforms only at concentrations of 1–10 mM. The s for saccharin binding to four CA isoforms ranged from 1.0 to 5.9 mM (except CA I where there was no shift detected). This result significantly contradicts earlier finding by Köhler et al. and D’Ascenzio et al., where all tested 14 isoforms of CA bound saccharin with nanomolar to micromolar affinity [5, 9]. The CA VII has been shown to bind saccharin with 10 nM affinity [5]. Our results indicate that the affinity is 100,000-fold weaker. However, our results confirm that saccharin bound CA VII, the strongest of the five tested isoforms. Therefore, selectivity towards CA VII is shown by both FTSA and inhibition methods. Isothermal titration calorimetry confirmed that saccharin bound all tested CAs with the weaker than 100 μM.

There is no clear explanation for such significant discrepancy between the binding measurements by FTSA-ITC and inhibition of activity measurements by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay. However, different approaches sometimes yield different results and it may be necessary to further investigate this reaction by other techniques.

The thermodynamics-structure correlation diagrams, as shown in Figure 5, could help design compounds with desired properties such as increased affinities or increased selectivity toward a desired CA isoform. However, it should be kept in mind that the diagrams in Figure 5 and the values in Tables 1 and 2 represent only the observed s that are valid exclusively for pH 7.0 and 37°C. These values depend on pH because there are linked protonation reactions observed upon compound binding to CA [26, 27]. In order to better understand the structure-thermodynamics correlations, it would be important to obtain the intrinsic values of binding by subtracting the contributing protonation reactions. However, such subtraction is not the subject of this paper because the actual affinities occurring at pH 7.0 are the observed values and it is important to compare them with the ones obtained by other methods such as stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay [5, 9].

Saccharine contains only a secondary sulfonamide group that apparently binds CAs significantly weaker than modified compounds bearing primary sulfonamide groups. Their binding is expected to be quite different and thus exhibits significantly different affinities for CAs. Compound 2 bears both the primary and secondary sulfonamide groups, but it is expected to bind through its primary sulfonamide to the zinc of CA as confirmed by docking. Furthermore, it bound significantly stronger than saccharin itself.

Compounds 3 and 4 are the strongest binders of the four tested compounds towards all CAs. It was interesting to see if some of their structural moieties could be used for the design of compounds with even greater affinity or increased selectivity towards a desired CA isoform. Docking showed that the compounds bound in a quite different structural arrangement when comparing CA II and CA XII docked structures. This indicates that these and similar functional groups could be used to further increase the selectivity towards, for example, cancer related CA XII.

The affinity of several millimolar is sufficient to detect binding by X-ray crystallography if the added compound concentration is of the order of 1 mM. Therefore, there is no contradiction between our results that show weak saccharin binding and crystallographic structures that demonstrate saccharin bound in the active site of a CA.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Organic Synthesis of the Compounds

Saccharin (1) was purchased while compounds 24 were synthesized as previously described in [10]. Figure 1 shows the chemical structures of saccharin (1) and the three saccharin sulfonamide derivatives (2, 3, and 4) that are the subject of this paper.

4.2. Protein Preparation

Carbonic anhydrase isoforms I, II, VII, XII, and XIII were expressed and purified as previously described: CA I in [28], CA II in [29], CAs VII and XIII in [30], and CA XII in [26].

4.3. Determination of Compound Binding to CA Isoforms
4.3.1. Fluorescent Thermal Shift Assay

The fluorescent thermal shift assay (FTSA) measurements were performed in a Corbett Rotor-Gene 6000 (QIAGEN Rotor-Gene Q) instrument using the blue channel (excitation , detection  nm). The samples (20 μL volume) contained 5–10 μM protein, 0–200 μM compound, and 50 μM ANS (8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonate) in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 50 mM NaCl, and 0 or 2% DMSO (concentration in the final assay, v/v). The applied heating rate was 1°C/min. Data analysis was performed as previously described [28].

4.3.2. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments were performed using VP-ITC instrument (Microcal, Inc., Northampton, USA) with 4–10 μM protein solution in the cell and 40–100 μM of the ligand solution in the syringe. A typical experiment consisted of 25 injections (10 μL each) within 3 min intervals. Experiments were performed at 37°C in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 50 mM NaCl at pH 7.0, with a final DMSO concentration of 2%, equal in the syringe and the cell.

4.3.3. Docking

Docking was performed using Vdock program [18, 19]. Structures 1jd0 [25] and 4g0c [31] were used to build CA II and CA XII receptors, respectively. The ligands were built using Avogadro v. 1.1.0 [32]. Force fields CHARMM22 [33] and CHARMm with Momany-Rone charges [34] were used to model the protein and ligand, respectively. The ligand parameters were generated using Discovery Studio Visualizer v. 3.5 (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Sulfonamide nitrogen was fixed at an X-ray position by setting it as a translational center and placing it into the translational box whose dimension was reduced to zero. The solvent effect during docking was modeled with the distance-dependent dielectric approximation, [35]. One hundred minima were generated (instead of the default 20) and the genetic algorithm was switched off during docking to ensure a more thorough search of the conformational space. The docked structures were graphically represented using VMD [36].

5. Conclusions

The saccharin sulfonamides exhibited nanomolar and subnanomolar affinities toward selected CA isoforms. However, unmodified saccharin bound the tested CAs with only 1–10 mM affinity. Saccharin is a secondary sulfonamide and bound CAs significantly weaker than saccharin sulfonamide derivatives that are primary sulfonamides. The Gibbs free energies of binding show the functional group influence on the binding constants of saccharin and its sulfonamide derivatives.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This research was funded by a Grant (no. LIG-09/2012) from the Research Council of Lithuania (DM). This study was supported by the Latvian National Research Programme 2010–2013 “BIOMEDICINE” (PT). The authors acknowledge FP7-REGPOT-2009-1 Grant “MoBiLi” agreement no. 245721 and the COST Projects TD0905 and CM0804.


  1. C. T. Supuran, “Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 168–181, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. V. M. Krishnamurthy, G. K. Kaufman, A. R. Urbach et al., “Carbonic anhydrase as a model for biophysical and physical-organic studies of proteins and protein-ligand binding,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 946–1051, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. S. Sly and P. Y. Hu, “Human carbonic anhydrases and carbonic anhydrase deficiencies,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 64, pp. 375–401, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  4. V. Alterio, A. Di Fiore, K. D'Ambrosio, C. T. Supuran, and G. De Simone, “Multiple binding modes of inhibitors to carbonic anhydrases: how to design specific drugs targeting 15 different isoforms?” Chemical Reviews, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 4421–4468, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Köhler, A. Hillebrecht, J. Schulze Wischeler et al., “Saccharin inhibits carbonic anhydrases: possible explanation for its unpleasant metallic aftertaste,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 46, no. 40, pp. 7697–7699, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Rami, J.-Y. Winum, A. Innocenti, J.-L. Montero, A. Scozzafava, and C. T. Supuran, “Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: copper(II) complexes of polyamino-polycarboxylamido aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides are very potent inhibitors of the tumor-associated isoforms IX and XII,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 836–841, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Sonmez, C. Bilen, S. Sumersan et al., “In vitro inhibition effect and structure-activity relationships of some saccharin derivatives on erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase I and II,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 29, pp. 118–123, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Wilson, Q. Tanko, M. M. Wendland, J. E. Meany, J. F. Nedved, and Y. Pocker, “The inhibition of bovine carbonic anhydrase by saccharin and 2- and 4-carbobenzoxybenzene sulfonamide,” Physiological Chemistry and Physics and Medical NMR, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. D’Ascenzio, S. Carradori, C. De Monte, D. Secci, M. Ceruso, and C. T. Supuran, “Design, synthesis and evaluation of n-substituted saccharin derivatives as selective inhibitors of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase XII,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 22, pp. 1821–1831, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  10. E. M. Ivanova, E. Y. Simin, I. V. Vozny, P. Trapencieris, and R. Žalubovskis, “Synthesis of 6-sulfamoylsaccharin and study of its reactivity in alkylation reactions,” Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1561–1564, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Matulis, J. K. Kranz, F. R. Salemme, and M. J. Todd, “Thermodynamic stability of carbonic anhydrase: measurements of binding affinity and stoichiometry using thermofluor,” Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 5258–5266, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. M. Mezzasalma, J. K. Kranz, W. Chan et al., “Enhancing recombinant protein quality and yield by protein stability profiling,” Journal of Biomolecular Screening, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 418–428, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Zubriene, J. Matuliene, L. Baranauskiene et al., “Measurement of nanomolar dissociation constants by titration calorimetry and thermal shift assay—radicicol binding to Hsp90 and ethoxzolamide binding to CAII,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2662–2680, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. Cimmperman and D. Matulis, “Protein thermal denaturation measurements via a fluorescent dye,” RSC Biomolecular Sciences, pp. 247–274, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  15. F. H. Niesen, H. Berglund, and M. Vedadi, “The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability,” Nature Protocols, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 2212–2221, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. F. Brandts and L.-N. Lin, “Study of strong to ultratight protein interactions using differential scanning calorimetry,” Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 29, pp. 6927–6940, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. W. Pantoliano, E. C. Petrella, J. D. Kwasnoski et al., “High-density miniaturized thermal shift assays as a general strategy for drug discovery,” Journal of Biomolecular Screening, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 429–440, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. V. Kairys and M. K. Gilson, “Enhanced docking with the mining minima optimizer: acceleration and side-chain flexibility,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 1656–1670, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. David, R. Luo, and M. K. Gilson, “Ligand-receptor docking with the Mining Minima optimizer,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Čapkauskaite, A. Zubriene, L. Baranauskiene et al., “Design of [(2-pyrimidinylthio)acetyl]benzenesulfonamides as inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrases,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, pp. 259–270, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Senger, M. A. Convery, C. Chan, and N. S. Watson, “Arylsulfonamides: a study of the relationship between activity and conformational preferences for a series of factor Xa inhibitors,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 16, no. 22, pp. 5731–5735, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Senger, C. Chan, M. A. Convery et al., “Sulfonamide-related conformational effects and their importance in structure-based design,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2931–2934, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng et al., “The protein data bank,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  24. K. D'Ambrosio, B. Masereel, A. Thiry, A. Scozzafava, C. T. Supuran, and G. De Simone, “Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: binding of indanesulfonamides to the human isoform II,” ChemMedChem, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 473–477, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. A. Whittington, A. Waheed, B. Ulmasov et al., “Crystal structure of the dimeric extracellular domain of human carbonic anhydrase XII, a bitopic membrane protein overexpressed in certain cancer tumor cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 17, pp. 9545–9550, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. V. Jogaite, A. Zubriene, V. Michailoviene, J. Gylyte, V. Morkunaite, and D. Matulis, “Characterization of human carbonic anhydrase XII stability and inhibitor binding,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1431–1436, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Baranauskienė and D. Matulis, “Intrinsic thermodynamics of ethoxzolamide inhibitor binding to human carbonic anhydrase XIII,” BMC Biophysics, vol. 5, article 12, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  28. L. Baranauskiene, M. Hilvo, J. Matuliene et al., “Inhibition and binding studies of carbonic anhydrase isozymes I, II and IX with benzimidazo[1,2-c][1,2,3]thiadiazole-7-sulphonamides,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 863–870, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Cimmperman, L. Baranauskiene, S. Jachimovičiute et al., “A quantitative model of thermal stabilization and destabilization of proteins by ligands,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 3222–3231, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Sdžius, L. Baranauskien, D. Golovenko et al., “4-[N-(Substituted 4-pyrimidinyl)amino]benzenesulfonamides as inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase isozymes I, II, VII, and XIII,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 7413–7421, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Z. Fisher, M. Aggarwal, A. Y. Kovalevsky, D. N. Silverman, and R. McKenna, “Neutron diffraction of acetazolamide-bound human carbonic anhydrase II reveals atomic details of drug binding,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, no. 36, pp. 14726–14729, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. D. Hanwell, D. E. Curtis, D. C. Lonie, T. Vandermeerschd, E. Zurek, and G. R. Hutchison, “Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform,” Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 4, no. 8, article 17, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. D. MacKerell Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott et al., “All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 18, pp. 3586–3616, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  34. F. A. Momany and R. Rone, “Validation of the general purpose quanta 3. 2/charmm force field,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 13, pp. 888–900, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  35. B. R. Gelin and M. Karplus, “Side-chain torsional potentials: effect of dipeptide, protein, and solvent environment,” Biochemistry, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1256–1268, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  36. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, “VMD: visual molecular dynamics,” Journal of Molecular Graphics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Vaida Morkūnaitė et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.