BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 938368 |

Ute Hempel, Carolin Preissler, Sarah Vogel, Stephanie Möller, Vera Hintze, Jana Becher, Matthias Schnabelrauch, Martina Rauner, Lorenz C. Hofbauer, Peter Dieter, "Artificial Extracellular Matrices with Oversulfated Glycosaminoglycan Derivatives Promote the Differentiation of Osteoblast-Precursor Cells and Premature Osteoblasts", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 938368, 10 pages, 2014.

Artificial Extracellular Matrices with Oversulfated Glycosaminoglycan Derivatives Promote the Differentiation of Osteoblast-Precursor Cells and Premature Osteoblasts

Academic Editor: Bernd Stadlinger
Received13 Jan 2014
Revised07 Apr 2014
Accepted08 Apr 2014
Published28 Apr 2014


Sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAG) are components of the bone marrow stem cell niche and to a minor extent of mature bone tissue with important functions in regulating stem cell lineage commitment and differentiation. We anticipated that artificial extracellular matrices (aECM) composed of collagen I and synthetically oversulfated GAG derivatives affect preferentially the differentiation of osteoblast-precursor cells and early osteoblasts. A set of gradually sulfated chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronan derivatives was used for the preparation of aECM. All these matrices were analysed with human bone marrow stromal cells to identify the most potent aECM and to determine the influence of the degree and position of sulfate groups and the kind of disaccharide units on the osteogenic differentiation. Oversulfated GAG derivatives with a sulfate group at the C-6 position of the N-acetylglycosamine revealed the most pronounced proosteogenic effect as determined by tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition. A subset of the aECM was further analysed with different primary osteoblasts and cell lines reflecting different maturation stages to test whether the effect of sulfated GAG derivatives depends on the maturation status of the cells. It was shown that the proosteogenic effect of aECM was most prominent in early osteoblasts.

1. Introduction

Extracellular matrix (ECM) is an important component of the stem cell niche influencing stem cell fate [1]. Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) sense not only neighbouring cells such as hematopoietic stem cells, sinusoidal endothelial cells, or fat cells but also the chemical composition of their microenvironment. In the bone marrow niche, the BMSC are in contact with several collagen types, fibronectin, and sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG), mainly heparan sulfate [2]. There is growing evidence from in vitro studies on the importance of sGAG in facilitating the osteogenic differentiation route of BMSC [3, 4]. Heparan sulfate was identified as an important factor initiating embryonic stem cells to exit from self-renewal and regulating their lineage fate [5]. Kraushaar et al. [6] pointed out that embryonic stem cell differentiation is accompanied by structural changes of heparan sulfate, for example, by increasing degree of sulfation of N-, 3-O-, and 6-O-position. Mature bone ECM contains much less sGAG (less than 1% of bone dry weight) than the ECM of bone marrow and consists predominantly of mineralized collagen [7, 8]. Synthetically sulfated hyaluronan derivatives (sHA) and oversulfated chondroitin sulfate derivatives (sCS) as components of artificial ECM (aECM) have been recently described to promote adhesion and proliferation of dermal fibroblasts [9] and to influence osteoclastogenesis [10]. aECM with sHA derivatives are known to enhance osteogenic differentiation of hBMSC even in the absence of dexamethasone [11] which has been described as an established supplement to induce osteogenic differentiation in vitro [12].

In this study, a set of gradually sulfated hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate derivatives differing in the number and the position of sulfate groups was used for the preparation of aECM. The aECM were applied as a substrate for several osteoblast precursor cells and cell lines derived from different sources and origins. We hypothesized that the response to the aECM will depend on the maturation state of the cell (line)s. TNAP activity and calcium deposition were determined as markers for osteogenic differentiation.

2. Materials and Methods

Unless otherwise mentioned, cell culture reagents were from Biochrom KG (Berlin Germany); fetal calf serum was from BioWest (via Th.Geyer, Hamburg, Germany); cell culture plastic ware was from Greiner BioOne (Frickenhausen, Germany) and Nunc (via Thermo Scientific, Langenselbold, Germany); and biochemical reagents were from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany). Rat tail collagen I was from BD Bioscience (Heidelberg, Germany) and chondroitin sulfate (sCS1; bovine trachea) from Sigma.

2.1. Preparation and Characterisation of Artificial Extracellular Matrices (aECM)

Table 1 lists the GAG derivatives which were used for the preparation of the aECM. The synthesis and characterization of (s)GAG derivatives were performed as described earlier [9, 11, 13]. The preparation of the sulfated HA derivative sHA16S was previously reported by Becher et al. [14] and Schulz et al. [15]. aECM were prepared from collagen I (col) and (s)GAG derivatives as described in [9, 11, 13]. Briefly, 1 mg collagen I was dissolved in 1 mL of ice cold 10 mM acetic acid and was mixed with an equal volume of 1 mg (s)GAG derivative/mL dissolved in ice cold double concentrated fibrillogenesis buffer (50 mM sodium dihydrogenphosphate and 11 mM potassium dihydrogenphosphate, pH 7.4). 220 μL of the collagen I/(s)GAG derivative mixture per cm² was placed onto tissue culture polystyrene plates (TCPS). Fibrillogenesis was performed overnight at 37°C. The resulting aECM were air-dried, washed two times with 1 mL deionised, sterile water, and air-dried again. Before cell culture experiments aECM were rinsed with sterile PBS for 1 h at 37°C.


sCS1Chondroitin sulfate117,9001.4
sCS2Sulfated chondroitin sulfate223,2001.5
sCS3Sulfated chondroitin sulfate319,9001.5

HAHyaluronan01,17 × 1064.8
sHA1Δ4SSulfated hyaluronan 126,4002.0
sHA1Δ6SSulfated hyaluronan142,6002.0
sHA2Sulfated hyaluronan226,4001.8
sHA3Sulfated hyaluronan347,8001.7

: degree of sulfation (average number of sulfate groups per disaccharide repeating unit).
bMW: weight-average molecular weight determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using laser light scattering (LLS) detection.
cPD: polydispersity index, determined from the molecular weight distribution calculated from the number-average and weight average molecular weights obtained by GPC with refraction index (RI) detection.
2.2. Isolation of Primary Osteoblast-Precursor Cells/Premature Osteoblasts and Cultivation of Cells

Human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) were isolated from bone marrow aspirates, obtained from Caucasian donors (average age  yrs., male and female donors), at the Bone Marrow Transplantation Center of the University Hospital Dresden, and were characterized as described in [16]. The donors were informed about the procedures and gave their full consent. The study was approved by the Local Ethics Commission (ethic vote No. EK114042009). Four hBMSC preparations were chosen for the experiments according to prior characterization of their osteogenic differentiation capacity and according to the characteristic “similar basal TNAP activity in passage 1.” hBMSC preparations of individual donors were not pooled. The cells were used in passages 2–4.

For isolation of primary rat osteoblasts/osteoblast-precursors, NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were considered. Rat calvarial osteoblasts (rCaOB) were isolated from new-born Wistar rats and characterized as described [17]. Rat bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) were isolated from femora and tibiae of adult Wistar rats (2-3-month old). The bones were dissected and the bone marrow was flushed three times with medium containing 10% HI-FCS and antibiotics. The cell suspension was filtered through a 40 μm strainer, pelleted, and treated for 4 min. with ACK solution (155 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 110 mM Na2EDTA, pH 7.4) to remove erythrocytes. Subsequently, cells were resuspended in medium and plated onto tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) plates. The osteoblast phenotype was confirmed by determination of tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) activity and calcium phosphate deposits. The cell lines MG-63 (CRL-1427), SaOS-2 (HTB-85), and MC3T3-E1 clone 4 (CRL-2593) were obtained from ATCC (American Tissue & Cell Culture via LGC Standards GmbH, Wesel, Germany) and cultured according to supplier’s recommendations. MLO-Y4 cell line was described in detail by Kato et al. [18] and was a kind gift from Lynda Bonewald (Kansas City, USA).

Cell characteristics, plating density, and media used for cell expansion are given in Table 2. In order to have the different cell (line)s at day 4 after plating in the same state of subconfluency, hBMSC were plated with deviant cell density considering that the cells are larger in size [19]. Primary cells were used from the second to fourth passage. All media contained 2 mM glutamine and 10,000 IE penicillin/10,000 μg streptomycin/mL. For the experiments, cells were plated onto TCPS or aECM-coated TCPS in medium as listed in Table 2 (=basal medium, BM). At day 4 after plating cells were cultured in BM, in BM supplemented with 10 mM β-glycerol phosphate and 300 μM ascorbate (=osteogenic medium, OM), and in OM supplemented with 10 nM dexamethasone (dex.) (=OM/D). At day 11 after plating the activity of TNAP was determined, and at day 22 after plating the amount of deposited calcium was quantified.

CellsSpecies Expansion mediumSeeding density
Source Characteristics

hBMSCHumanDMEM/10% HI-FCS7,000Iliac crest/bone marrowPrimary cells Osteoblast-precursors
MG-63HumanDMEM/10% HI-FCS12,500Long bones/osteosarcomaCell linePremature osteoblasts
SaOS-2HumanMcCoys5A/15% HI-FCS12,500Long bones/osteosarcoma Cell lineMature osteoblasts

rCaOBRatDMEM/10% HI-FCS12,500Skull/calvariaePrimary cellsPremature osteoblasts
rBMSCRatDMEM/10% HI-FCS 12,500Long bones/bone marrowPrimary cellsOsteoblast-precursors

MC3T3-E1Mouse -MEM/10% HI-FCS12,500Skull/calvariaeCell linePremature osteoblasts
MLO-Y4Mouse -MEM/10% HI-FCS12,500Long bones/femora, tibiae Cell line Senescent osteoblasts (osteocytes)

2.3. Determination of TNAP Activity

TNAP activity was determined in cell lysates (lysis buffer: 1.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 10), 1 mM ZnCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1% Triton X-100) with p-nitrophenyl phosphate as a substrate as described previously [20]. TNAP activity was calculated from a linear calibration curve () prepared with p-nitrophenol. Specific TNAP activity is given in mU/mg protein. Protein concentration of the lysate was determined by Rotiquant assay (Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and calculated from a linear calibration curve () obtained with bovine serum albumin.

2.4. Determination of Calcium Deposition

Calcium deposition was quantified with the calcium kit (Greiner Diagnostics, Bahlingen, Germany) as previously described [11]. Cell layers were washed with PBS, dried, and incubated with 0.5 M HCl at 4°C for 24 h. Calcium content in the lysates was quantified photometrically with cresolphthalein complexone at 570 nm from a linear calibration curve () prepared with calcium chloride. Calcium content is given in μmol/cm² culture area.

2.5. Morphology of hBMSC on aECM

At day 11 after plating on the different aECM, F-actin arrangement was monitored by fluorescence staining. The cells were washed gently with PBS and incubated with 4% paraformaldehyde (w/v) (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) in PBS for 10 min. After permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 20 min, nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (w/v) (Sigma) in PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (Sigma). The cells were incubated with 5 U AlexaFluor-488 phalloidin/mL (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) of PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween-20 at 25°C for 1 h. Subsequently 0.2 μg 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)/mL (Sigma) PBS for nuclei staining was applied for 15 min at 25°C. Afterwards, the cells were embedded in Mowiol 4–88 (Sigma) and visualized using an AxioPhot fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). For detection of the fluorescence, the following filters were used: excitation 450–490 nm and emission 515–565 nm for AlexaFluor-488, an excitation 365 nm and emission 420 nm for DAPI. Digital images were obtained with an AxioCam MRm camera (Carl Zeiss) by using AxioVision software release 4.6 (Carl Zeiss).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was performed with nonpooled cells from four different donors (in the case of primary cells: hBMSC, rCaOB, rBMSC) or four independent cell cultures (in the case of cell lines: MG-63, SaOS-2, MC3T3-E1, and MLO-Y4) each in triplicate. The results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5.04 software (Statcon, Witzenhausen, Germany) by one-way ANOVA (Figures 2 and 3) and two-way ANOVA analysis (Figure 4, Table 3) with Bonferroni’s posttest.


hBMSCOM/D0.540 ± 0.0660.778 ± 0.164 0.538 ± 0.082
OM0.286 ± 0.0680.355 ± 0.098 0.186 ± 0.049
BM0.093 ± 0.0040.044 ± 0.0070.070 ± 0.0070.074 ± 0.0020.096 ± 0.009
MG-63OM/D0.043 ± 0.0010.040 ± 0.002 0.027 ± 0.002
OM0.019 ± 0.0020.014 ± 0.001 0.012 ± 0.001
BM0.003 ± 0.0020.001 ± 0.0010.007 ± 0.0020.009 ± 0.0010.005 ± 0.003
SaOS-2OM/D6.584 ± 0.5106.360 ± 0.3227.766 ± 0.9646.982 ± 0.6898.495 ± 1.550
OM6.865 ± 0.6397.652 ± 0.5198.504 ± 0.7277.059 ± 0.3938.466 ± 1.515
BM0.058 ± 0.0100.050 ± 0.0580.059 ± 0.0290.068 ± 0.0550.035 ± 0.011

rCaOBOM/D4.408 ± 0.4395.323 ± 0.526 3.937 ± 0.123
OM6.552 ± 0.2306.883 ± 0.244 5.135 ± 0.122
BM0.075 ± 0.0790.027 ± 0.0060.048 ± 0.0220.003 ± 0.0050.014 ± 0.003
rBMSCOM/D1.625 ± 0.1221.542 ± 0.129 1.444 ± 0.104
OM1.559 ± 0.1381.478 ± 0.086 1.325 ± 0.088
BM0.009 ± 0.0020.017 ± 0.0050.030 ± 0.0200.021 ± 0.0100.010 ± 0.002

MC3T3-E1OM/D0.288 ± 0.0800.352 ± 0.101 0.384 ± 0.082
OM0.384 ± 0.0820.376 ± 0.098 0.279 ± 0022
BM0.005 ± 0.0020.011 ± 0.0050.006 ± 0.0020.008 ± 0.0030.005 ± 0.001
MLO-Y4OM/D2.359 ± 0.064 3.045 ± 0.4233.436 ± 0.1261.633 ± 0.132
OM3.436 ± 0.1267.849 ± 1.3485.271 ± 0.3713.783 ± 0.1084.271 ± 0.108
BM0.084 ± 0.0060.028 ± 0.0070.050 ± 0.0140.048 ± 0.0090.009 ± 0.007

Calcium amount mol/cm² given as mean ± SEM; significant differences of OM/D, OM, and BM on (s) GAG versus col-aECM were calculated by two-way ANOVA and indicated with a , b , and c , .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of aECM with Gradually Sulfated GAG Derivatives on TNAP Activity, Calcium Deposition, and Morphology of hBMSC

Gradually sulfated GAG derivatives were synthesized using natural chondroitin sulfate (C4S = CSA = sCS1) (Figure 1(a)) and natural hyaluronan (Figure 1(b)) as educts. These derivatives were used to prepare collagen I matrices with about 2–7% (w/w) of GAG (for characteristics see [11, 13]). Using aECM with gradually sulfated GAG derivatives as a substrate for hBMSC, we addressed the effects of the degree of sulfation, the position of sulfate group(s), and the kind of disaccharide unit (HA: glucuronic acid (GlcA)-N-acetyl-glucosamine (NAcGlc); CS: GlcA-N-acetyl-galactosamine (NAc-Gal)) on TNAP activity and calcium deposition. aECM composed of col were used as a reference. hBMSC were plated in BM onto aECM, differentiated in OM/D from day 4, and analysed at day 11 after plating for TNAP activity and at day 22 after plating for calcium deposition. Both parameters were determined as indicators of osteogenic differentiation [12]. aECM containing sCS2, sCS3, sHA14S, sHA2, and sHA3 caused a significant increase of TNAP activity by about threefold in comparison to col-aECM (Figure 2(a)) whereas aECM containing sCS1, hyaluronan, and sHA16S did not alter TNAP activity. Once sufficient phosphate was released by TNAP from the in vitro-substrate -glycerol phosphate (component of OM/D) the mineralisation took place. The elevated calcium deposition around hBMSC on aECM containing sCS2, sCS3, sHA14S, sHA2, and sHA3 (Figure 2(b)) correlated with increased TNAP activity. The different aECM did not cause appreciable changes of cell morphology as assessed by F-actin staining (Figure 2(c)). A well-organized, dense F-actin cytoskeleton forming strong fibres was seen in hBMSC on col, col/sCS1, col/HA, col/sHA14S, and col/sHA16S. On col/sCS2, col/sCS2, col/sHA2, and col/sHA3, the F-actin fibres looked slightly tender; nevertheless, they formed also a tight cytoskeletal network.

Sulfated GAG derivatives per se and as a component of aECM were shown to enhance osteogenic differentiation of hBMSC [11, 20]; however, it was not really clear whether the effect was dependent on the number and/or position of sulfate groups and was influenced by the kind of disaccharide unit. Here we demonstrated with hBMSC that the effect of col/sGAG-aECM on TNAP activity and calcium deposition was independent of the kind of disaccharide units (GlcA-GlcNac or GlcA-GalNAc) and the absolute number of sulfated groups. This effect was seen to the same extent with sulfated chondroitin sulfate derivatives sCS2 and sCS3 and all sulfated hyaluronan derivatives (besides sHA16S), respectively. An increasing degree of sulfation (sCS3 versus sCS2; sHA2 and sHA3 versus sHA14S) did not significantly alter the effect on TNAP activity and calcium deposition. Other than the number of sulfate groups their position seems to be important: sGAG derivatives without sulfate group in C-6 position but with a sulfate group at C-4 position of the N-acetyl-glucosamine such as the native chondroitin-4-sulfate (sCS1) and the sHA16S derivative did not increase TNAP activity and calcium deposition, suggesting that the sulfation of the hydroxyl group at C-6 position of the N-acetyl-glucosamine is necessary for the proosteogenic effect of sGAG. For a further proof of this hypothesis, the use of chondroitin-6-sulfate as a component of aECM would be helpful. Sufficiently pure chondroitin-6-sulfate, however, was not available; the commercially chondroitin-6-sulfate consists to more than the half of chondroitin-4-sulfate [11].

3.2. Influence of aECM on Osteoblast-Precursor Cells, Premature and Mature Osteoblasts

Various primary cells and cell lines of human, rat, and mouse origin were used to investigate whether the effect of aECM on osteogenic differentiation is restricted solely to human BMSC or whether it is obtained also for cells of other species. To see if the response to the aECM depends on the maturation stage of the cells, osteoblast-precursor cells, premature and mature osteoblasts of human, rat and mouse origin were subjected to col/sCS3- and col/sHA3-aECM in comparison to col-, col/sCS1-, and col/HA-aECM. The in vitro experiments were performed with human and rat bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSC) reflecting osteoblast-precursor cells, with human MG-63 cell line, primary rat calvaria osteoblasts (rCaOB) and mouse MC3T3-E1 cell line reflecting early premature osteoblasts, and with human SaOS-2 cell line and mouse MLO-Y4 cell line reflecting late mature osteoblasts, respectively. To evaluate whether -glycerol phosphate and ascorbate are sufficient supplements for the induction of osteogenic differentiation or whether dexamethasone is mandatory, the cells were cultured on TCPS in basal medium (BM), osteogenic medium (OM) containing -glycerol phosphate and ascorbate, and OM/D (OM supplemented with dexamethasone), respectively, and analysed for TNAP activity at day 11 (Figure 3). Dexamethasone (OM/D) was essential to induce TNAP activity in both human BMSC and MG-63 (Figure 3(a)) but not in rBMSC and rCaOB (Figure 3(b)). -Glycerol phosphate and ascorbate (OM) were sufficient for human SaOS-2 to induce TNAP activity; with OM/D no further increase of TNAP activity was seen (Figure 3(a)). In rCaOB, an increase of TNAP activity was seen with OM, whereas in the presence of dexamethasone TNAP remained at the level of BM (Figure 3(b)). TNAP activity of rBMSC (Figure 3(b)) and MC3T3-E1 (Figure 3(c)) was not dependent on medium supplements. In MLO-Y4, dexamethasone caused a significant decrease of TNAP activity (Figure 3(c)).

Cells were plated on col-aECM as a reference and on col-aECM containing sCS1, sCS3, HA, and sHA3. They were cultured in BM, OM, and OM/D and analysed for TNAP activity at day 11 (Figure 4). aECM with sCS3 and sHA3 induced an increase of TNAP activity in hBMSC, MG-63, rCaOB, and rBMSC; this effect was not dependent on the addition of osteogenic supplements and always present in BM (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). TNAP activity of SaOS-2 was rather negatively influenced by all aECM compared to TCPS (dotted line = 100%; Figure 4(a)); in comparison to BM, the effect was more pronounced when SaOS-2 were cultured in OM/D and OM. In MC3T3-E1, the contact to sCS3- and sHA3-containing aECM caused a decrease of TNAP activity; the other aECM did not alter TNAP activity (Figure 4(c)). TNAP activity of MLO-Y4 was higher in cells on col/sCS1-aECM than in cells on col-aECM (Figure 4(c)).

The results of calcium determination on aECM at day 22 are summarized in Table 3. In all cell (line)s, a marked calcium deposition was only seen when the cells were cultured in OM and OM/D (both containing -glycerol phosphate). In comparison to col-aECM, aECM with sCS3 and sHA3 induced a significant increase of calcium deposition in hBMSC, MG-63, rCaOB, and rBMSC. The decrease of calcium deposition in MC3T3-E1 on col/sCS3- and col/sHA3-aECM correlated to the effect of these aECM on TNAP activity. With SaOS-2 cells no significant differences in calcium deposition between the different aECM were found in OM/D and OM. According to the effect on TNAP activity, col/sCS1-aECM caused in MLO-Y4 cells in OM/D a significant higher calcium deposition in comparison to col-aECM.

The results indicate that primary osteoblasts-precursor cells as well as premature osteoblasts (BMSC, MG-63, and early osteoblasts isolated from calvariae of newborn rats) are responsive to aECM with oversulfated GAG derivatives such as col/sCS3 and col/sHA3. BMSC are multipotent precursor cells which can be differentiated into fibrogenic, myogenic, neuronal, osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineage; the signals driving them into a particular differentiation route come from intrinsic genetic programming, diverse soluble mediators, and the ECM. [21, 22]. Both MG-63 and SaOS-2 are human osteosarcoma-derived cell lines; MG-63 cells are referred to as premature osteoblasts; SaOS-2 cells are characterized as mature osteoblasts [2326]. In contrast to MG-63, SaOS-2 cells did not respond to aECM with high-sulfated GAG derivatives; no differences in TNAP activity and calcium deposition were determined on all used aECM. TNAP activity and calcium deposition of SaOS-2 was increased with all aECM in the presence of osteogenic supplements (OM and OM/D). Both mouse MC3T3-E1 which are premature osteoblasts and MLO-Y4 which are senescent osteoblasts did not response on aECM with high-sulfated GAG derivatives. For MC3T3-E1 it was reported that a natural oversulfated chondroitin sulfate derivative, isolated from squid cartilage and consisting of GlcA 13 GalNAc (C4-sulfate and C6-sulfate) disaccharide units, enhanced the deposition of collagen and calcium phosphate [27]. In contrast, our studies showed that aECM with high-sulfated GAG derivatives (col/sCS3, col/sHA3) caused in MC3T3-E1 a decrease of TNAP activity compared to col-aECM. Reasonably this cell line share some but not all of features of primary osteoblasts [28]. The osteocyte cell line MLO-Y4 responded in OM/D—unlike the other osteoblasts—to col/sCS1 with a significant increase of TNAP activity and calcium deposition compared to col-aECM. MLO-Y4 cells reflect the most mature late osteoblast phenotype used in this study [29, 30]. Late osteoblasts/osteocytes derive from active osteoblasts which had synthesized new bone matrix and become incorporated therein [31]. Bone matrix maturation is associated with altered GAG composition switching from heparan sulfate-proteoglycans which are mainly responsible for interaction with mediator proteins to chondroitin sulfate-proteoglycans which are less potent in mediator binding but support calcium accumulation [32, 33]. In adult bone matrix, chondroitin-4-sulfate (=sCS1) was seen to be the most abundant GAG [34]. The results of this study suggest that synthetically sulfated GAG derivatives could partially reflect the bone marrow environment and its influence on early osteogenic differentiation.

4. Conclusion

Artificial ECM with collagen I and oversulfated GAG derivatives provide a cellular microenvironment which facilitates the osteogenic differentiation preferentially of osteoblast-precursor cells and early osteoblasts. The sulfate group in C-6 position of the N-acetyl- glucosamine seems to be mandatory for the proosteogenic effect of sulfated GAG derivatives. Osteoblast-precursor cells and early osteoblasts as hBMSC and MG-63 revealed a pronounced osteogenic differentiation on aECM with oversulfated GAG derivatives even in the absence of dexamethasone. The strong osteoinductive effect of aECM with oversulfated GAG derivatives (partially independent on dexamethasone) makes them an interesting tool for tissue engineering approaches. They are a structurally well-characterised alternative to natural GAG to address the effects of sulfated GAG on early osteogenic differentiation to a defined GAG structure.


(a)ECM:(Artificial) Extracellular matrix
α-MEM:Minimal essential medium
CS:Chondroitin sulfate
DMEM:Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium
DSS:Degree of sulfation per disaccharide repeating unit
h/rBMSC:Human/rat bone marrow stromal cells
HI-FCS:Heat-inactivated fetal calf serum
PBS:Phosphate-buffered saline
rCaOB:Rat calvaria osteoblast
sCS1:Low-sulfated CS = chondroitin-4-sulfate = chondroitin sulfate A (DSS ~ 1)
sCS2:Medium-sulfated CS derivate (DSS~2)
sCS3:High-sulfated CS derivate (DSS~3)
(s)GAG:(Sulfated) Glycosaminoglycan
sHA14S and sHA16S:Low-sulfated HA derivatives (DSS~1)
sHA2:Medium-sulfated HA derivative (DSS~2)
sHA3:High-sulfated HA derivative (DSS~3)
TCPS:Tissue culture polystyrene
TNAP:Tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.


The authors are very grateful to Professor Bornhäuser and Katrin Müller from the Stem Cell Lab of the University Hospital in Dresden for providing the human mesenchymal stromal cells. The authors want to thank the members of Lynda Bonewald’s Lab for MLO-Y4 cell line. This work was supported by Grant of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB/TR67 projects B1, B2, A2, and A3).


  1. M. Watt and T. S. Huck, “Role of extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, pp. 467–473, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  2. X.-D. Chen, “Extracellular matrix provides an optimal niche for the maintenance and propagation of mesenchymal stem cells,” Birth Defects Research C, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Hoshiba, N. Kawazoe, T. Tateishi, and G. Chen, “Development of stepwise osteogenesis-mimicking matrices for the regulation of mesenchymal stem cell functions,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 45, pp. 31164–31173, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Dombrowski, S. J. Song, P. Chuan et al., “Heparan sulfate mediates the proliferation and differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 661–670, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. C. Kraushaar, Y. Yamaguchi, and L. Wang, “Heparan sulfate is required for embryonic stem cells to exit from self-renewal,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 8, pp. 5907–5916, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. C. Kraushaar, S. Dalton, and L. Wang, “Heparan sulfate: a key regulator of embryonic stem cell fate,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 394, pp. 741–751, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  7. V. M. Mania, A. G. Kallivokas, C. Malavaki et al., “A comparative biochemical analysis of glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans in human orthotopic and heterotopic bone,” IUBMB Life, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 447–452, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. R. van der Harst, P. A. J. Brama, C. H. A. van de Lest, G. H. Kiers, J. DeGroot, and P. R. van Weeren, “An integral biochemical analysis of the main constituents of articular cartilage, subchondral and trabecular bone,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 752–761, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. van der Smissen, V. Hintze, D. Scharnweber et al., “Growth promoting substrates for human dermal fibroblasts provided by artificial extracellular matrices composed of collagen I and sulfated glycosaminoglycans,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 34, pp. 8938–8946, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Salbach-Hirsch, J. Kraemer, M. Rauner et al., “The promotion of osteoclastogenesis by sulfated hyaluronan through interference with osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand/osteoprotegerin complex formation,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, pp. 7653–7661, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  11. U. Hempel, S. Möller, C. Noack et al., “Sulfated hyaluronan/collagen I-matrices enhance osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro even in the absence of dexamethasone,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 8, pp. 4064–4072, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. F. Pittenger, “Mesenchymal stem cells from adult bone marrow,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 449, pp. 27–44, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. U. Hempel, V. Hintze, S. Möller, M. Schnabelrauch, D. Scharnweber, and P. Dieter, “Artificial extracellular matrices composed of collagen i and sulfated hyaluronan with adsorbed transforming growth factor β1 promote collagen synthesis of human mesenchymal stromal cells,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 659–666, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Becher, S. Möller, D. Weiss, J. Schiller, and M. Schnabelrauch, “Synthesis of new regioselectively sulfated hyaluronans for biomedical application,” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 296, no. 1, pp. 446–452, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. C. Schulz, P. Korn, B. Stadlinger et al., “Coating with artificial matrices from collagen and sulfated hyaluronan influences the osseointegration of dental implants,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 247–258, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Oswald, S. Boxberger, B. Jørgensen et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells can be differentiated into endothelial cells in vitro,” Stem Cells, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 377–384, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  17. U. Geißler, U. Hempel, C. Wolf, D. Scharnweber, H. Worch, and K.-W. Wenzel, “Collagen type I-coating of Ti6Al4V promotes adhesion of osteoblasts,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 51, pp. 752–760, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. Kato, J. J. Windle, B. A. Koop, G. R. Mundy, and L. F. Bonewald, “Establishment of an osteocyte-like cell line, MLO-Y4,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2014–2023, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  19. U. Hempel, T. Hefti, M. Kalbacova, C. Wolf-Brandstetter, P. Dieter, and F. Schlottig, “Response of osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells to zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 174–181, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Büttner, S. Möller, M. Keller et al., “Over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate derivatives induce osteogenic differentiation of hMSC independent of BMP-2 and TGF-β1 signalling,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 330–340, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. M. Abdallah and M. Kassem, “Human mesenchymal stem cells: from basic biology to clinical applications,” Gene Therapy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Nombela-Arrieta, J. Ritz, and L. E. Silberstein, “The elusive nature and function of mesenchymal stem cells,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 126–131, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. B. Rodan, Y. Imai, M. A. Thiede et al., “Characterization of a human osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2) with osteoblastic properties,” Cancer Research, vol. 47, no. 18, pp. 4961–4966, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. Bächle and R. J. Kohal, “A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 683–692, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Pautke, M. Schieker, T. Tischer et al., “Characterization of osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63, Saos-2 and U-2 OS in comparison to human osteoblasts,” Anticancer Research, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 3743–3748, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Vohra, K. M. Hennessy, A. A. Sawyer, Y. Zhuo, and S. L. Bellis, “Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell and osteosarcoma cell adhesion to hydroxyapatite,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3567–3574, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Miyazaki, S. Miyauchi, A. Tawada, T. Anada, S. Matsuzaka, and O. Suzuki, “Oversulfated chondroitin sulfate-E binds to BMP-4 and enhances osteoblast differentiation,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 217, no. 3, pp. 769–777, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. T. Ballock and A. B. Roberts, “The role of TGF-β in bone growth and bone repair,” in Growth Factors: A Practical Approach, I. McKay and I. Leigh, Eds., pp. 85–107, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  29. L. F. Bonewald, “The amazing osteocyte,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Rosser and L. F. Bonewald, “Studying osteocyte function using the cell lines MLO-Y4 and MLO-A5,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 816, pp. 67–81, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. L. Knothe Tate, J. R. Adamson, A. E. Tami, and T. W. Bauer, “The osteocyte,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. J. Manton, D. F. M. Leong, S. M. Cool, and V. Nurcombe, “Disruption of heparan and chondroitin sulfate signaling enhances mesenchymal stem cell-derived osteogenic differentiation via bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2845–2854, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. J. Waddington, H. C. Roberts, R. V. Sugars, and E. Schönherr, “Differential roles for small leucine-rich proteoglycans in bone formation,” European Cells and Materials, vol. 6, pp. 12–21, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  34. C. W. Prince and J. M. Navia, “Glycosaminoglycan alterations in rat bone due to growth and fluorosis,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 1576–1582, 1983. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ute Hempel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.