BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Imaging Infection and Inflammation

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 509295 |

Durga M. S. H. Chandrupatla, Karin Weijers, Yoony Y. J. Gent, Inge de Greeuw, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Gerrit Jansen, Conny J. van der Laken, Carla F. M. Molthoff, "Sustained Macrophage Infiltration upon Multiple Intra-Articular Injections: An Improved Rat Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis for PET Guided Therapy Evaluation", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 509295, 11 pages, 2015.

Sustained Macrophage Infiltration upon Multiple Intra-Articular Injections: An Improved Rat Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis for PET Guided Therapy Evaluation

Academic Editor: Filippo Galli
Received06 Jun 2014
Revised27 Aug 2014
Accepted07 Sep 2014
Published28 Jan 2015


To widen the therapeutic window for PET guided evaluation of novel anti-RA agents, modifications were made in a rat model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Arthritis was induced in the right knee of Wistar rats with repeated boosting to prolong articular inflammation. The contralateral knee served as control. After immunization with methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA) in complete Freund’s adjuvant and custom Bordetella pertussis antigen, one or more intra-articular (i.a.) mBSA injections were given over time in the right knee. Serum anti-mBSA antibodies, DTH response, knee thickness, motion, and synovial macrophages were analyzed and [18F]FDG(-general inflammation) and (R)-[11C]PK11195 (macrophages-)PET was performed followed by ex vivo tissue distribution. Significant anti-mBSA levels, DTH, swelling of arthritic knee, and sustained and prolonged macrophage infiltration in synovial tissue were found, especially using multiple i.a. injections. Increased [18F]FDG and (R)-[11C]PK11195 accumulation was demonstrated in arthritic knees as compared to contralateral knees, which was confirmed in ex vivo tissue distribution studies. Boosting proved advantageous for achieving a chronic model without remission. The model will offer excellent opportunities for repeated PET studies to monitor progression of disease and efficacy of novel therapeutic agents for RA in the same animal.

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease that results in chronic and systemic inflammation of the joints, affecting approximately 0.5–1% of the adult population [1]. It is characterized by inflammation of the joints resulting in synovial hyperplasia by infiltration of immune cells further leading to cartilage and bone destruction [2]. Timely recognition of RA will allow for earlier start of therapy preventing more severe expansion of the disease. Moreover, several studies have shown that tight control as a treatment strategy in individual RA patients seems promising in achieving predefined level of  low disease activity or preferably remission within a reasonable period of time [3, 4]. To this end, noninvasive imaging modalities may serve as sensitive and accurate tools for assessment and monitoring of disease activity during therapy to evaluate therapeutic efficacy.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising noninvasive imaging modality that can be used to visualize active arthritis at a molecular level in RA [5] via targeting macrophages [6, 7]. Most human studies targeting macrophages by PET have been performed with the macrophage tracer -PK11195 in various inflammatory diseases [8]. -PK11195 targets the 18-kd translocator protein (formerly known as peripheral benzodiazepine receptor) a mitochondrial membrane protein that is upregulated in activated macrophages [8]. Histological studies have shown that macrophages are an important biomarker for prediction and monitoring of therapeutic effects of a wide range of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics [9, 10]. Jahangier et al. demonstrated a clear positive clinical effect in RA patients after intra-articular treatment with Yttrium-90 and glucocorticoids correlating effect with a decrease in total numbers of macrophages [11].

Animal models can be applied for in vivo evaluation of efficacy of new therapeutic agents for RA [12]. As it takes some time for most antirheumatic drugs to read out their mode of action on arthritis activity with macrophage infiltration as a biomarker, a chronic RA animal model is required with sustained arthritis activity characterized by macrophage infiltration in synovial tissue. As currently no suitable rat model is available that would allow noninvasive macrophage PET guided evaluation of the therapeutic agents, we have optimized an antigen induced model with persistent arthritis in rats offering sufficiently sized inflamed joints to enable quantitative measurements of PET tracer uptake in inflamed joints as well as the opportunity for comparison to contralateral noninflamed control joints within the same animals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Wistar rats (male, 150–200 grams, Charles River International Inc, Sulzfeld, Germany) were provided with standard food (16% protein rodent diet, Harlan Laboratories Inc., Madison, WI, USA) and water ad libitum. Rats were housed in groups of three or four in conventional cages and kept in a room with a 12-hour light/dark cycle and constant room temperature (21°C) and humidity level (50%). All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the Dutch law on animal experimentation and were approved by the VU Medical Center Institutional Committee on Animal Experimentation.

2.2. Antigen Induced Rat Model

As reference in this paper, the methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA) induced rat model as described by Van De Putte et al. [13] and Dijkstra et al. [14] was applied (Table 1), indicated hereafter as “original model.” In short, according to the descriptions of the original model, rats were immunized subcutaneously (s.c.) twice at days 0 and 7 with an emulsion containing mBSA (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie BV, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) dissolved with complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and custom Bordetella pertussis (CBP) antigen (Becton Dickinson, Breda, The Netherlands) [14]. Rats were immunized with two administrations of 200 uL solution containing 50 mg mBSA in 1 mL 0.9% NaCl emulsified with an equal volume of complete Freund’s adjuvant antigen (CFA) and custom Bordetella pertussis (CBP) antigen ( cells/mL). Both the first and the second immunization were performed in the tail base. At day 21, local arthritis was induced by injecting 20 μL mBSA solution containing 10 mg mBSA [15] in 1 mL 0.9% NaCl intra-articular (i.a.) in the right knee (RA knee); the contralateral left knee served as an internal control (Con-RA). The i.a. injection was situated between femur and tibia and behind the patella tendon.

Code groupOriginalGroup AGroup BGroup CGroup DGroup E
Group F

Number of boostNoNoNo35NoNo
Sacrificed (days post)66281928628

1st immunization (mBSA/CFA/CBP antigen)*
No. of rats11343644
Volume (µL)200 200 200 200 200200200
Administration routes.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.
Administration locationTail baseTail baseTail baseTail baseTail baseTail baseTail base

2nd immunization (mBSA/CFA/CBP antigen)*
Volume (µL)200100 100 100 100100100
Administration routes.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.s.c.
Administration locationTail baseNeck and upper flankNeck and upper flankNeck and upper flankNeck and upper flankNeck and upper flankNeck and upper flank

Delayed time hypersensitivity (DTH) CBP antigen
Volume (µL)**252525252525
Administration siteRight earRight earRight earRight earRight earRight earRight ear

Local (i.a.) arthritis induction (mBSA)Saline
i.a. injection (mBSA*** or saline)1111111
mBSA#, boost i.a. injections0003500
Injected volume (µL)20606060606060
Administration siteknee jointknee jointknee jointknee jointknee jointknee jointknee joint

50 mg mBSA in 1 mL 0.9% NaCl emulsified with an equal volume of complete Freund’s adjuvant antigen (CFA) and custom Bordetella pertussis (CBP) antigen (1 × 1011 cells/mL), **CBP antigen (2.7 × 1010 cells/mL 0.9% NaCl), ***10 mg mBSA in 1 mL 0.9% NaCl, and #1 mg mBSA in 1 mL 0.9% NaCl.
2.3. Modifications of  Original Rat Model

Three modifications were performed as compared to the original model (Table 1). At first, the second immunization (initially 200 uL in the original model) step was adapted. To minimize animal discomfort by multiple immunizations at a single location (as was performed in the original model), of second immunization was divided into two injections with one in the neck and one in the upper flank (away from the knees) with each injection consisting a volume of 100 uL. Secondly, the i.a. injection volume of mBSA was increased to 60 uL while in the original it was 20 uL. Both modifications were applied in groups A, B, C, and D.

The last modification comprised repeated i.a. injections (resp., 3x (group C) and 5x (group D)) while in group A and B no boosts were applied. The difference between groups A and B was the sacrificing day: 6 and 28 days after i.a. injection for groups A and B, respectively (Figure 1). Control rats received an i.a. injection in the right knee with sterile physiological saline instead of mBSA. Subgroups of control rats were sacrificed at 6 (group E) and 28 (group F) days, respectively.

2.4. Validation Experiments

(i) Examination of Immunization Status

Serum Levels of Anti-MBSA. Blood samples before and after the immunization procedure were obtained from the tail vein with a Microvette (cb300, Sarstedt BV, Etten-Leur, The Netherlands). After centrifugation at room temperature (5 min/2500 ×g), serum samples were stored at −80°C until use. Anti-mBSA levels were determined by ELISA [16]. Briefly, 96-well microplates (Greiner bio-one, Alphen a/d Rijn, The Netherlands) were precoated overnight with 100 μL/well of 5 μg mBSA/mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 37°C. After washing with PBS (100 μL/well, 5 times) wells were blocked with 0.1% gelatin (Baker Chemical Co, Austin, Texas, USA) in PBS for 30 minutes at 37°C. Subsequently, 1 : 100, 1 : 200, and 1 : 400 diluted serum samples were added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing with PBS, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeled to rabbit-anti-rat (RαR) IgG1 antibody 1 : 1000 (Invitrogen, NY, USA) was added to the wells and incubated for 2 hrs at room temperature. Enzyme reaction was visualized with 0.8 mg aminosalicylic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie BV, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) and 0.5 μL of 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) dissolved in 1 mL distilled water. Absorption at 450 nm was measured using an ELISA reader (Tecan, Spectra Fluor, MTX Labsystems, Inc, Vienna, USA).

Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Test (DTH). At day 19, immunization status was examined by DTH [17, 18] response. CBP antigen (25 μL,  cells/mL 0.9% NaCl) was injected s.c. in the right ear of the rat. The left ear served as an internal control. A control group of rats was injected with sterile physiological saline in the left ear. Subsequently, ear thickness was measured at 0, 6, 24, and 48 hours after injection using a digital micrometer.

(ii) Macroscopic Evaluation of Arthritis Activity. Macroscopic evaluation of the severity of arthritis was assessed by knee measurements prior to (at the same day) every i.a. injection. In between, knees were measured 3 times a week until rats were sacrificed. Knees were measured by caliper measurement of knee thickness in mediolateral direction.

2.5. Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

Both knees were dissected in toto and fixed for 7 days at 4°C in 10% freshly made paraformaldehyde in PBS with 2% sucrose (pH = 7.3) prior to decalcification in 123 mM sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Na2-EDTA·2H2O) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 113 mM sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie BV, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) (pH = 7.2) for ~5.5 weeks at 4°C. Decalcified knees were rinsed for 24 hours in 2% sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie BV, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) in PBS (pH = 7.2) and 24 hours in 2% sucrose in PBS and 50 mM NH4Cl (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie BV, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) (pH = 7.1). Thereafter, knees were embedded in paraffin. Sections of 5 μm were cut through the center of the joint in longitudinal direction and stained with haematoxylin and eosin to assess the degree of inflammation in synovial tissue.

Immunohistochemical localization of rat macrophages was determined by a mouse anti-rat monoclonal antibody ED1 (HM3029, Hycult, PA, USA) a lysosomal membrane related antigen on rat macrophages and by a mouse anti-rat monoclonal antibody ED2 (MCBI,VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam) cell surface glycoprotein related antigen on rat macrophages [19]. An IgG1 isotype antibody (HI1016, Hycult, PA, USA) was used as negative control antibody. Briefly, after antigen retrieval with a solution of 0.1% pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie BV, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) with 0.1% of HCl 37% in PBS per slide for 30 min at 37°C, sections were incubated for 1 h with 1 : 100 diluted ED1, ED2, or isotype control antibody in 0.1% BSA/PBS for a period of 1 h. The detection EnVision kit (K4063 dual-link-HRP rabbit/mouse, DAKO, Glostrup, UK) was used according to instructions of the manufacturer for a period of 30 min. After washing with PBS, slides were stained for peroxidase activity with 3.-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) containing 0.01% H2O2. Subsequently, sections were counterstained with haematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Negative controls were included by replacement of the primary antibody with an isotype specific control antibody. Images were captured using a Leica 4000B microscope and Leica digital camera DC500 (Microsystems B.V. Rijswijk, The Netherlands).

2.6. PET and Ex Vivo Tissue Distribution Studies

FDG with a radiochemical purity of >97% was purchased from BV Cyclotron VU (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). (R)-PK11195 was synthesized as described previously [20], with radiochemical purity of >98% and a mean specific activity of GBq/μmol. Rats were anesthetized using inhalation anesthetics (isoflurane 2–2.5% and oxygen 0.45 volume %). The jugular vein was cannulated with a polyurethane 3 French cannula. During all procedures vital body signs like, body temperature, heartbeat, respiratory rate, and blood oxygen saturation were monitored continuously using a rectal temperature probe and pulse oxygen meter with SpO2 sensor. Anesthetized rats were positioned in a double-layer LSO high resolution research tomograph (HRRT) (Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN, USA), a small animal, and human brain 3D scanner with high spatial resolution (2.3–3.4 mm full width at half maximum) and high sensitivity [21]. First, a 6-minute transmission scan was acquired using a 740 MBq 137Cs rotating point source. Next, FDG ( MBq) or (R)-PK11195 ( MBq) was administered i.v. through the cannula and a dynamic emission scan of 1 hour was acquired. PET data were normalized and corrected for scatter, random, attenuation, decay, and dead time. Data were acquired in 64-bit list mode and converted into 16 sinograms with frame durations increasing from 15 up to 300 seconds. Images were reconstructed using an iterative 3D ordinary Poisson ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OSEM) algorithm with 8 iterations and 16 subsets and a matrix size of , resulting in a cubic voxel size of . PET images were made of rats from the original model and of rats in group A. Sixty minutes after PET scanning, rats were sacrificed and knees, blood, and various tissues were excised and weighed and the amount of radioactivity was determined using an LKB 1282 Compugamma CS gamma counter (LKB, Wallac, Turku, Finland). Rats without PET scanning (groups B–E) were sacrificed 60 minutes after tracer injection followed by ex vivo tissue biodistribution. Results were expressed as percentage of the injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g). PET images were analyzed using AMIDE software (Amide’s Medical Image Data Examiner, version 0.9.2) [22]. Fixed size ellipsoidal shaped regions of interest (ROI) (dimensions: ) were manually drawn over the area of the left and right knees in the last frame of the image. ROIs were projected onto the dynamic image sequence, and time-activity curve (TAC) data were extracted. TACs were expressed as standardized uptake values (SUV): mean ROI radioactivity concentration normalized for injected dose and body weight [7].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS version 20. A one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was to test for normal distribution taking ( value) criteria for -test. A Wilcoxon signed rank (exact) test was used to determine differences between paired observations (e.g., tracer uptake in right versus Con-RA knee, thickness of the antigen-induced versus control ear, and mediolateral thickness of RA knee versus Con-RA knee). A Mann-Whitney (exact) test was used to determine differences in absorbance before and after immunization. A value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A Bonferroni correction was applied when necessary.

3. Results

During the entire study, no major change in body weight was observed and knee functionality was never dramatically impaired during the course of the induction of arthritis in the RA knee of the rats.

3.1. Immunization Status

All rats showed a significant increase () in the level of mBSA antibody titers as compared with mBSA levels before immunization (Figure 2(a)).

In addition, a DTH test was executed and all rats showed a good DTH response with a significant () increase in ear thickness of the right ear at 6, 24, and 48 hours after injection compared with the control left ear (Figure 2(b)) and compared to control rat ear’s injected with saline (data not shown).

3.2. Arthritis Evaluation of No-Boost Model

As negative control, healthy rat knee sections, stained with the ED1 and ED2 rat macrophage specific antibodies, showed no signs of inflammation in the synovial tissue (Figure 3, left panels). Some macrophages were found in the single layered synovial lining. In contrast, the RA knees of the rats in the firstly adapted no-boost group (group A, 0x boost panels) showed a moderate influx of inflammatory cells in the synovium with a hyperplasia of synovial tissue consisting of 3-4 layers.

PET tracer FDG uptake in the RA knees of rats from group A was also low and showed no obvious difference as compared to the Con-RA knees, as shown in Figure 5(a).

3.3. Arthritis Evaluation of the Modifications in the Rat Model
3.3.1. Macroscopic Evaluation of Arthritis Activity

In the no-boost group A, a significant difference was observed in knee thickness between the RA knees compared to the Con-RA knees (), which persisted until day 6 after i.a. injection () (Figure 2(c)). In the no-boost group followed for 28 days (group B, Figure 2(c)), differences between the RA versus Con-RA knee were significant () at day 4 but gradually decreased () in 28 days. Continued observation without boosting demonstrated that the RA knee thickness decreased significantly () between 6 and 28 days (group A versus group B). Although significantly decreased in size, the knee thickness did not normalize completely at 28 days when compared to the Con-RA knees of the same rats.

When the rats were dosed with 3 boost injections (group C) significant differences were found in knee thickness of the RA versus Con-RA knee ( and at day 4 as well as at the sacrificing day, resp.). In the group of rats dosed with 5 boost injections (group D), also significant differences were observed between the RA and Con-RA knees ( and at days 4 and 28, resp.).

Comparing the boost groups C and group D (3x and 5x boosts) on the day those rats were sacrificed, a significant difference in RA knee thickness was observed, with group C < group D (). Comparing group A (no boost) with both boost groups (C and D) with respect to RA knee measurements, significant differences were observed (group A versus group C and group A versus group D: and , resp.).

3.3.2. Immunohistochemistry

As shown in Figure 3, synovial tissue of healthy rat knees showed no signs of inflammation (Figure 3, left panel) and RA knees in group A (no boost) showed a moderate influx of inflammatory cells in the synovium with a hyperplasia of synovial tissue consisting of 3-4 layers. In contrast, the representative images of the knees from rats in group C and group D demonstrated a clear increase in ED1 and ED2 positively stained macrophages and multilayered synovial tissue (>5; see also next paragraph).

The infiltration of macrophages was quantified in the different groups of rats (between 2 and 4 rats per group). In Figure 4(a), the results for ED1 positive macrophages in group A and group B are shown. In comparison to group A, group B showed significantly lower numbers of  ED1+ macrophages () (but still significantly higher than the control group F ()). In Figure 4(b) (ED1) and Figure 4(c) (ED2), the ED1 and ED2 positive macrophages in knees of rats in all groups are represented, including rats injected with saline (showing very low numbers of macrophages). On comparing those numbers in group C and group B, RA knees from rats in group C clearly displayed more ED1 and ED2 positive macrophages. For those in group D an even higher amount of ED2+ macrophages was found as compared to the no-boost groups (Figure 4(c)). In Figure 3, representative images of ED1 and ED2 staining sections of different groups are shown.

PET and Ex Vivo Tissue Distribution Studies. The feasibility of PET evaluation of arthritis activity in the rats of group A (0x boost) as compared to the original model was assessed. Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show representative FDG and (R)-PK11195 images. The uptake of   FDG in the RA knee of the group A was clearly higher than that in the original model (Figure 5(c), left; original model). Time-activity curves (SUV versus time after tracer injection) of the tracers up to 6 days are depicted in Figure 6. The SUV in the RA knee as compared to the Con-RA knee for FDG in group A rats was significantly increased ( versus ; ; Figure 6(a)) and the ratio of uptake in the RA knee was 2 times higher than the Con-RA knee (Figure 6(c)). The SUV for (R)-PK11195 (Figure 6(b)) also increased in the RA knee ( versus ) and the ratio in the RA knee uptake is 1.8 times more than the Con-RA knee in group A (Figure 6(c)).

After PET, ex vivo tissue distribution of group A rats was performed and both FDG and (R)-PK11195 (Figure 7) showed increased accumulation in the RA knee (1.6 and 1.4 times higher, resp.) compared to uptake in Con-RA knee FDG and (R)-PK11195 ( and in RA knees; and , resp.). Furthermore, both tracers showed increased uptake in macrophage rich tissues such as spleen, liver, and bone (marrow). Moreover, increased uptake of (R)- PK11195 in the heart could be related to TSPO expression on myocardial cells. Both tracers showed accumulation in the intestinal system and renal system (Figure 7) due to excretion of the tracers via hepatobiliary and renal route. Physiological uptake of FDG was noted in heart and brain tissue.

Results from the ex vivo tissue distribution one hour after injection of (R)- PK11195 in the no-boost groups (A and B) and the boost groups C and D are depicted in Figure 8. For all groups, extra-articular tracer uptake was again observed in macrophage rich tissue and physiological uptake in the intestines.

No-boost groups (A and B) (Figure 8(a)): a 1.45 times higher uptake of (R)- PK11195 was measured in group A between the RA and Con-RA knee. In group B, a 1.2 times higher uptake in the RA knee () was found compared to Con-RA knee () (). Comparing group A with B, it was observed that the tracer uptake in the RA knee from rats in group B was a little bit less (although not significantly different from that of group A).

Multiple boost group C versus group D (Figure 8(b)): the uptake of (R)-PK11195 in RA knees was higher in rats from group C and group D as compared to that in group B, although a level of significance was not reached between the no-boost B and group C. However, comparing no-boost (group B) with the boost group (group D) a significant difference in tracer uptake was found ().

Zooming in on the rats sacrificed at day 28 ((groups B, D, E, and F) and for group C at day 19) after the last i.a. injection a linear correlation was found between uptake and total number of ED1 positive macrophages. In contrast, no correlation could be demonstrated with respect to ED2 positive macrophages.

4. Discussion

In this study an mBSA-induced RA rat model was described with sustained and prolonged RA condition. Adaptations with respect to the original model described by Van De Putte et al. [13] and Dijkstra et al. [14] resulted in a model that allows evaluation of arthritis activity and therapeutic efficacy of novel antirheumatic drugs with PET. The modifications resulted in significantly higher influx of macrophages in synovial tissue, corresponding to improved visualization of arthritis with PET.

So far, no animal model was available for PET guided imaging and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy with a sustained and prolonged arthritic condition, long enough to test new drugs as well as showing some level of systemic disease. With our focus on detection of (sub)clinical arthritis versus noninflamed joints, animal models with predominant bone destruction and those with polyarticular distribution are not favored. Various rodent models of RA (acute and chronic) have been described where the very acute models are not very useful for monitoring therapeutic efficacy [23]. Chronic models such as collagen induced arthritis (CIA), bacterial (streptococcal) cell wall contents induced arthritis (SCW) and adjuvant induced arthritis (AIA) have their specific characteristics [24]. In AIA, rats develop polyarthritis with prominent bone destruction. In CIA [24] and SCW [25], swelling of paws and limbs appears with periods of remission dampening the readouts for therapeutic intervention, whereas SCW shows low significant systemic effect.

Several advantages of our present RA model are presented: it is monoarthritic; hence the contralateral knee could be used as an internal control, its robustness, and, after the immunization period, the relative rapid development of arthritis within a week characterized by clear macrophage infiltration in the synovium of one joint, resembling human RA, and with the other joints as internal control. Using the boosting procedure, the therapeutic window was largely enhanced. Macrophages play an important role in early RA and may therefore be exploited as potential targets for the development of new treatment and imaging agents [26, 27]. This model might also be particularly useful for PET purposes, since arthritis is induced in a relatively large knee joint, which is an advantage as detection of arthritis in smaller joints could be hampered by limited spatial resolution of PET scanners. Also, injection of larger volumes associated with low specific activity of some PET tracers is more problematic in mice than in rats. For monitoring response with PET imaging, quantification is essential. To this end, assessment of tracer levels in blood will be needed at any time after injection of the PET tracer which poses a problem with respect to frequent blood sampling in mice.

Limitations of the mBSA induced RA rat model are possibly the longer total time period (immunizations, i.a., and boost injections, frequent knee measurements). Also, skilled biotechnicians are needed to perform the precise intra-articular injection in the knee joint. Although the model consists of only one macroscopically inflamed knee joint, the contralateral knee also showed a low level of microscopic abnormalities related to the infiltration of macrophages in the synovium, being indicative for some systemic inflammatory effects, as also observed in a study by Meyer et al. [28]. Nevertheless, the clear difference of macrophage infiltration in the arthritic versus the noninflamed knee allowed internal comparison on PET.

PET studies showed increased uptake of both FDG and (R)-PK11195 in RA compared to that in Con-RA knees. Both tracers, however, have limitations for clinical imaging of arthritis activity. FDG has high sensitivity but low specificity for imaging of arthritis. In a previous clinical study, absolute uptake of RA joints and osteoarthritic joints was comparable [29]. Although (R)-PK11195 is a more specific tracer targeting mainly macrophages a limitation of this tracer is the background uptake in periarticular tissues [30]. The background binding of the PET tracer to both the noninflamed knee joint and periarticular bone (marrow) (in both knees and other physiological locations) could lead to underestimation of targeting properties of the applied PET tracer since PET imaging of a target relies on the contrast between the target and its background. Obtaining high, arthritic to background ratios is of particular clinical relevance to detect very early (sub)clinical synovitis as it is often only subtly present at this stage of the disease. Therefore, further research of new specific targets on activated macrophages in the early phase of RA remains warranted. An alternative candidate target in this respect is the folate receptor being selectively expressed on activated macrophages [31, 32]. Based on nanomolar binding affinities for folate and folate-conjugated ligands, this receptor might be an attractive target for both imaging and therapeutic applications, with folate linked therapeutic agents showing little or no collateral toxicity to normal tissue [33] and specifically target the activated macrophages rather than the nonactivated macrophages [34].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, in this study, a rat arthritis model suitable for PET guided evaluation of antirheumatic drugs was optimized and validated. The boost regimen proved advantageous for achieving a chronic model with sustained arthritis activity. This model is excellent for in vivo testing of novel PET tracers for their suitability for imaging of arthritis (activity) as well as for PET monitoring of efficacy of novel therapeutic agents for RA.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank R. Bergstra and M. Verlaan for excellent assistance in surgical procedures, tissue biodistribution, and PET studies and analysis; M. Mooijer for tracer planning; M.C.M Al for help with DTH measurement and tissue distribution; Dr. G. Scheffer for help with ELISA; and Professor Dr. P. van der Valk and Professor Dr. C.J.F. van Noorden for histopathological advice and helpful discussions. Funding was received from the Dutch Arthritis Association (NRF-09-01-404).


  1. M. Feldmann, F. M. Brennan, and R. N. Maini, “Rheumatoid arthritis,” Cell, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 307–310, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. B. McInnes and G. Schett, “The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 23, pp. 2205–2219, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. P. M. Goekoop-Ruiterman, J. K. de Vries-Bouwstra, C. F. Allaart et al., “Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the best study): a randomized, controlled trial,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 3381–3390, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. F. Bakker, J. W. G. Jacobs, S. M. M. Verstappen, and J. W. J. Bijlsma, “Tight control in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and feasibility,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. iii56–iii60, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Beckers, C. Ribbens, B. André et al., “Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with 18F-FDG PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 956–964, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  6. K. Kubota, K. Ito, M. Morooka et al., “Whole-body FDG-PET/CT on rheumatoid arthritis of large joints,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 783–791, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Y. J. Gent, K. Weijers, C. F. M. Molthoff et al., “Evaluation of the novel folate receptor ligand [18F]fluoro-PEG-folate for macrophage targeting in a rat model of arthritis,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 15, no. 2, article R37, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. B. Banati, J. Newcombe, R. N. Gunn et al., “The peripheral benzodiazepine binding site in the brain in multiple sclerosis. Quantitative in vivo imaging of microglia as a measure of disease activity,” Brain, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 2321–2337, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. J. Haringman, D. M. Gerlag, A. H. Zwinderman et al., “Synovial tissue macrophages: a sensitive biomarker for response to treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 834–838, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. D. Smith, M. C. Kraan, J. Slavotinek et al., “Treatment-induced remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients is characterized by a reduction in macrophage content of synovial biopsies,” Rheumatology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 367–374, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Z. N. Jahangier, J. W. G. Jacobs, M. C. Kraan et al., “Pretreatment macrophage infiltration of the synovium predicts the clinical effect of both radiation synovectomy and intra-articular glucocorticoids,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1286–1292, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. Bolon, M. Stolina, C. King et al., “Rodent preclinical models for developing novel antiarthritic molecules: comparative biology and preferred methods for evaluating efficacy,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2011, Article ID 569068, 21 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. B. A. Van De Putte, J. W. Lens, W. B. Van Den Berg, and M. W. M. Kruijsen, “Exacerbation of antigen-induced arthritis after challenge with intravenous antigen,” Immunology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 161–167, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. D. Dijkstra, E. A. Dopp, I. M. C. Vogels, and C. J. F. van Noorden, “Macrophages and dendritic cells in antigen-induced arthritis. An immunohistochemical study using cryostat sections of the whole knee joint of rat,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 513–523, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. J. Griffiths, “Characterisation and pharmacological sensitivity of antigen arthritis induced by methylated bovine serum albumin in the rat,” Agents and Actions, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 88–95, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. L. E. M. van Lent, W. B. van Den Berg, J. Schalkwijk, L. B. van de Putte, and L. van den Bersselaar, “Allergic arthritis induced by cationic antigens: relationship of chronicity with antigen retention and T-cell reactivity,” Immunology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 265–272, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. M. Atkinson, P. A. Usher, P. H. Kvist, H. Markholst, C. Haase, and A. Nansen, “Establishment and characterization of a sustained delayed-type hypersensitivity model with arthritic manifestations in C57BL/6J mice,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 14, no. 3, article R134, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Tanaka, T. Kagari, H. Doi, and T. Shimozato, “Administration of anti-type II collagen antibody sustains footpad swelling of mice caused by a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction and induces severe arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 360–367, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. D. Dijkstra, E. A. Dopp, P. Joling, and G. Kraal, “The heterogeneity of mononuclear phagocytes in lymphoid organs: distinct macrophage subpopulations in the rat recognized by monoclonal antibodies ED1, ED2 and ED3,” Immunology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 589–599, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  20. H. Folkersma, J. C. Foster Dingley, B. N. M. van Berckel et al., “Increased cerebral (R)-[11C]PK11195 uptake and glutamate release in a rat model of traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal pilot study,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 8, article 67, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. E. Froklage, S. Syvänen, N. H. Hendrikse et al., “[11C]Flumazenil brain uptake is influenced by the blood-brain barrier efflux transporter P-glycoprotein,” EJNMMI Research, vol. 2, article 12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. M. Loening and S. S. Gambhir, “AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis,” Molecular Imaging, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 131–137, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. L. Asquith, A. M. Miller, I. B. McInnes, and F. Y. Liew, “Animal models of rheumatoid arthritis,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2040–2044, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Bevaart, M. J. Vervoordeldonk, and P. P. Tak, “Evaluation of therapeutic targets in animal models of arthritis: how does it relate to rheumatoid arthritis?” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 2192–2205, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. C. Schimmer, D. J. Schrier, C. M. Flory et al., “Streptococcal cell wall-induced arthritis: requirements for IL-4, IL- 10, IFN-γ, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 1466–1471, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  26. F. Chauveau, N. van Camp, F. Dollé et al., “Comparative evaluation of the translocator protein radioligands 11C-DPA-713, 18F-DPA-714, and 11C-PK11195 in a rat model of acute neuroinflammation,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 468–476, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. R. Fischer, C. Müller, J. Reber et al., “[18F]fluoro-deoxy-glucose folate: a novel PET radiotracer with improved in vivo properties for folate receptor targeting,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 805–813, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Meyer, H. Burkhardt, E. Palombo-Kinne et al., “123I-antileukoproteinase scintigraphy reveals microscopic cartilage alterations in the contralateral knee joint of rats with “monarticular” antigen-induced arthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 43, pp. 298–310, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  29. E. H. Elzinga, C. J. van der Laken, E. F. I. Comans, A. A. Lammertsma, B. A. C. Dijkmans, and A. E. Voskuyl, “2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose joint uptake on positron emission tomography images: rheumatoid arthritis versus osteoarthritis,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 357–360, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Y. J. Gent, A. E. Voskuyl, R. W. Kloet et al., “Macrophage positron emission tomography imaging as a biomarker for preclinical rheumatoid arthritis: findings of a prospective pilot study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. W. van der Heijden, R. Oerlemans, B. A. C. Dijkmans et al., “Folate receptor β as a potential delivery route for novel folate antagonists to macrophages in the synovial tissue of rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. L. Matteson, V. J. Lowe, F. G. Prendergast et al., “Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis using a novel folate targeted radiopharmaceutical Folatescan TM,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 253–259, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  33. C. M. Paulos, M. J. Turk, G. J. Breur, and P. S. Low, “Folate receptor-mediated targeting of therapeutic and imaging agents to activated macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1205–1217, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. Xia, A. R. Hilgenbrink, E. L. Matteson, M. B. Lockwood, J.-X. Cheng, and P. S. Low, “A functional folate receptor is induced during macrophage activation and can be used to target drugs to activated macrophages,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 438–446, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Durga M. S. H. Chandrupatla et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles