Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2008, Article ID 401645, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/401645
Research Article

The Role of -Containing Kainate Receptors in Entorhinal Cortex Gamma Frequency Oscillations

1Institute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, The Medical School Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
2The Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics (MB3) Program, Towson University, Room 360, Smith Hall, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21251-0001, USA
3Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Synaptic Plasticity, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK

Received 5 June 2008; Revised 21 July 2008; Accepted 22 September 2008

Academic Editor: C. Andrew Chapman

Copyright © 2008 Heather L. Stanger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Using in vitro brain slices of hippocampus and cortex, neuronal oscillations in the frequency range of 30–80 Hz (gamma frequency oscillations) can be induced by a number of pharmacological manipulations. The most routinely used is the bath application of the broad-spectrum glutamate receptor agonist, kainic acid. In the hippocampus, work using transgenic kainate receptor knockout mice have revealed information about the specific subunit composition of the kainate receptor implicated in the generation and maintenance of the gamma frequency oscillation. However, there is a paucity of such detail regarding gamma frequency oscillation in the cortex. Using specific pharmacological agonists and antagonists for the kainate receptor, we have set out to examine the contribution of kainate receptor subtypes to gamma frequency oscillation in the entorhinal cortex. The findings presented demonstrate that in contrast to the hippocampus, kainate receptors containing the subunit are critically important for the generation and maintenance of gamma frequency oscillation in the entorhinal cortex. Future work will concentrate on determining the exact nature of the cellular expression of kainate receptors in the entorhinal cortex.

1. Introduction

KARs are made up of various combinations of five subunits: GLUK5, GLUK6, GLUK7, KA1, and KA2 [1, 2] which are abundantly expressed in the neocortex [3]. These subunits make up tetramers of either homomeric or heteromeric assemblies, with GLUK5–7 being able to form functional homomeric receptors [1, 4]. KA1 and KA2 cannot form functional receptors when expressed alone [5, 6], yet are able to form functional KARs when expressed heteromerically with other subunits [1, 7, 8]. Differential patterns of expression of KARs in the CNS coupled with the existence of splice variants and mRNA editing suggest complex neurophysiological roles for the various subunits, and different roles in neuronal networks depending on their localization [9, 10].

Of particular interest is the role of KARs in the generation and maintenance of network neuronal oscillatory activity in cortical regions [9, 10]. Gamma frequency oscillations occur between 30–80 Hz and have been observed in many areas of the brain, including the hippocampus [1113] and cortical regions [1416]. Cortical gamma oscillations are important in higher brain functions, such as learning, memory, and cognition [1719], as well as processing of sensorimotor information [15, 16, 20]. In carrying out these functions, cortical gamma oscillations are implicated in various central processes, including long-term potentiation (LTP) and synaptic plasticity [21], with important roles in temporal regulation of neuronal activity.

Gamma frequency oscillations are recordable from the MEC during wakefulness in humans [22, 23], as well as in vivo in rodents [12], in vitro from perfused guinea pig brains [24, 25], and isolated rat brain slices [26, 27]. These gamma oscillations in the MEC play a role in the formation, processing, storage, and retrieval of memories [17, 18]. Previously it has been demonstrated in an in vitro preparation of the MEC that application of nanomolar concentrations of kainate (200–400 nM) can induce persistent gamma frequency oscillations [2628]. Using this in vitro model of MEC gamma frequency oscillations it has been elucidated that this activity is primarily generated by inhibitory-based neuronal networks [2931]. A similar mechanism for the generation of gamma frequency activity has been demonstrated in both the hippocampus and neocortex [32, 33].

To date our understanding of the role of KARs in neuronal network activity has been hampered by a paucity of selective pharmacological agents. The competitive AMPA/KAR antagonist, 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline (NBQX), shows little selectivity between AMPA receptors and KARs at high concentrations, yet at low concentrations (1 μM) can be used to block AMPA receptors, and isolate KAR responses [34, 35]. However, NBQX shows no selectivity between different KAR subunits. The role of GLUK5 and GLUK6 subunits in neuronal oscillatory activity in the hippocampus has been previously investigated using receptor knockout mice [9, 10]. However, interpretation of work using transgenic models should be viewed in the light of the knowledge that compensatory factors may play a role. The recent development of pharmacological agents with specificity for distinct subunits has led to the possibility of a detailed pharmacological investigation of the role of specific KARs in cortical gamma frequency oscillations. (S)-3-(2-Carboxybenzyl)willardiine (UBP302) is a novel selective GLUK5-containing KAR antagonist, with activity at both homomeric and heteromeric GLUK5-containing receptors [36, 37]. The activity of UBP302 on GLUK7 is controversial, Dolman et al. [37] showed that UBP296 (racemic form of UBP302) only weakly inhibited [3H]kainate binding to human GLUK7 (Ki value of 374 ± 122 μM). However, in an electrophysiological assay UBP302 was found to block rat homomeric GLUK7 receptors with an IC50 value of 4 μM but at a concentration of 100 μM only very weakly blocked rat GLUK6/GLUK7 receptors [38]. 5-Carboxy-2,4-di-benzamido-benzoic acid (NS3763) is another novel glutamate antagonist, which is selective and noncompetitive for homomeric GLUK5-containing KARs [39, 40]. (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-tert-butyl-isoxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid (ATPA) is a selective GLUK5-containing receptor agonist [41]. ATPA has been shown to depress excitatory and GABAergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus [42, 43]. However, Cossart et al. [35] demonstrated that lower concentrations of ATPA could directly depolarise hippocampal GABAergic interneurons leading to increases in the levels of tonic inhibition onto pyramidal neurons. More recently, similar concentrations of ATPA to that used in the Cossart et al. [35] study have been shown to facilitate both evoked and action potential-independent glutamate release in the neocortex [44].

The data presented here demonstrates a role of GLUK5-containing KARs in the MEC by examining the contribution of these receptor subtypes to gamma frequency oscillations. Using a pharmacological approach, we have demonstrated that GLUK5-containing KARs are important for the maintenance of gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. Moreover, the selective activation of GLUK5-containing KARs can induce persistent gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. We also demonstrate that it is the specific activation of homomeric GLUK5-containing KARs that is important for the generation of gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Preparation of EC-Hippocampal Slices

All procedures involving animals were carried out in accordance with UK Home Office Legislation. Male Wistar rats, weighing >150 grammes, were first anaesthetised by inhalation of the volatile anaesthetic isofluorane. This was immediately followed by intramuscular injection of a terminal dose of ≥100 mg/kg ketamine and ≥10 mg/kg xylazine. After confirmation of deep anaesthesia, rats were intracardiacally perfused with  mL sucrose-modified artificial cerebral spinal fluid (aCSF), composed of (in millimolar (mM)): 252 sucrose, 3 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2·2H2O, 10 glucose, and 24 NaHCO3. All salts were obtained from BDH Laboratory Supplies (Poole, UK), except MgSO4 which was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co (Mo, USA).

The whole brain was rapidly removed and maintained in a bath of cold sucrose-modified aCSF (4-5°C) during the dissection procedure. Horizontal slices (450 μm thick) were cut using a vibroslice (Leica VT1000S). Transverse EC-hippocampal slices were then transferred either to a holding chamber or directly to the recording chamber. They were maintained at 32 ± 1°C, at the interface between a continuous perfusion (~2-3 mL/min) of NaCl-based aCSF (containing (in mM): 126 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 1 MgSO4, 1.2 CaCl2·2H2O, 10 glucose, 24 NaHCO3) and humidified carbogen gas (95% O2/5% CO2). Slices were allowed to equilibrate for 60 minutes before any recordings were taken.

2.2. Electrophysiological Recording and Drug Application

Extracellular recordings were taken using glass electrodes pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (GC129 TF-10, 1.2 mm OD/0.94 mm ID) (Harvard Apparatus, Kent, UK) using a Flaming/Brown micropipette puller, model P-97 (Sutter Instrument Co., Calif, USA). This created electrodes with resistances of 2–4 MΩ. Electrodes were filled with NaCl-based aCSF and positioned in Layer III of the MEC. Control readings were taken from slices before drug application to confirm that any network activity seen following treatment was due to the presence of drugs.

To evoke gamma frequency oscillations, 400 nM kainic acid ((2S,3S,4S)-3-carboxymethyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid; Tocris Cookson, Bristol, UK) was bath applied to EC-hippocampal slices and left to equilibrate for 2-3 hours or until gamma oscillations had stabilised. All other drugs were bath applied to slices at known concentrations: UBP302 ((S)-3-(2-carboxybenzyl)willardiine; gift from Dr. David Jane, Department of Pharmacology, University of Bristol, UK) at 10 μM; ATPA ((RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-tert-butylisoxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid; Tocris Cookson, Bristol, UK) at 1–5 μM; NS3763 (5-carboxy-2,4-di-benzamido-benzoic acid; Tocris, Bristol, UK) at 10–15 μM; NBQX (2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline; Tocris, Bristol, UK) at 1–10 μM; and Carbachol (Sigma, UK) at 10–20 μM.

2.3. Data Acquisition

An AppleMac computer with the Axograph OSX software package (AxographX, Dr. John Clements, Australia) was used for all data acquisition. Signals were analogue filtered at 0.01–0.3 kHz and then digitized at a frequency of 10 kHz. Power spectra were constructed, where power at a given gamma frequency was defined as the area under the peak between 20 and 80 Hz. Power spectra were generated from digitized data, using 60 second epochs of recorded activity, and it was from these spectra that values for gamma oscillation peak frequency, peak amplitude, and spectral area power in the gamma frequency band were obtained.

2.4. Data Analysis

Data analysis was carried out using Excel and Kaleidagraph software packages. Kaleidagraph software was used to generate pooled power spectra, and the Excel package was used to calculate the mean and standard error of mean (SEM) of results, and to draw up histograms and line graphs. All data is presented as mean ± SEM. SigmaStat (Systat software, USA) was used for all statistical tests. Normality tests were carried out, and if data was found to be normally distributed, two-tailed paired t-tests were run. However, if data failed the normality test, the Wilcoxon signed rank test was carried out. This provided us with P-values for all data sets, and the significance level was set at 95%; values less than P = .05 were deemed to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Induction of Kainate-Driven Gamma Oscillations in the MEC

Previously, it has been demonstrated that low concentrations of kainic acid (kainate) evoke gamma frequency activity in the rat MEC in vitro [26, 27]. In this investigation, we produced persistent gamma oscillations in the MEC by bath application of kainate (400 nM) (Figure 1). Robust gamma frequency oscillations (  Hz; n = 17) were evoked in layer III of the MEC in all slices to which kainate had been applied (n = 17). This activity was generated within 15 minutes of kainate superfusion, a stable baseline was observed after 60–90 minutes. As previously reported [19], application of the competitive AMPA/KAR antagonist NBQX (10 μM) effectively abolished these kainate-induced gamma oscillations (n = 3) (Figure 1).

401645.fig.001
Figure 1: Gamma frequency oscillations can be induced in layer III of the MEC by application of kainate. (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity (i) in control setting, (ii) following application of 400 nM kainate, and (iii) following application of 10 μM NBQX in the presence of 400 nM kainate. Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.
3.2. A role for GLUK5-Containing KARs in the Maintenance of Kainate-Driven Gamma Oscillations

A possible role for GLUK5-containing KARs in the maintenance of kainate-driven gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC was investigated by testing the ability of the GLUK5 selective antagonist, UBP302, to inhibit preestablished kainate-induced gamma activity. Gamma oscillations were generated in the MEC by bath application of kainate (400 nM) and allowed to stabilise (n = 9) (Figure 2(a)). In the presence of UBP302 (10 μM), the amplitude of kainate-induced gamma oscillations was significantly reduced (control, μV2/Hz; v. UBP302, μV2/Hz; P < .05; n = 9), and area power of oscillations was also significantly decreased (control, μV2/Hz.Hz; v. UBP302, μV2/Hz.Hz; P < .05; n = 9) (Figures 2(a), 2(b)). However, following UBP302 application, the frequency of oscillations remained unchanged (control,  Hz; v. UBP302,  Hz; P > .1; n = 9). Washout of the effects of UBP302 on gamma frequency oscillations could not be achieved (n = 9) (Figures 2(a), 2(b)).

fig2
Figure 2: Antagonizing GLUK5-containing KARs with UBP302 inhibits kainate-driven gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity (i) in the presence of 400 nM kainate, (ii) following 10 μM UBP302 application, and (iii) during a washout period into 400 nM kainate. (b) Pooled power spectra (n = 9) produced from 60 second epochs of extracellular field recorded data, showing a control recording (black), a recording in the presence of 400 nM kainate (blue), application of 10 μM UBP302 (green), and washout back into 400 nM kainate (red). Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.
3.3. A role for GLUK5-Containing KARs in the Generation of Gamma Oscillations in the MEC

To investigate the role that GLUK5-containing KARs may play in the induction of kainate-driven gamma oscillations, we carried out two experiments, using the selective GLUK5-containing KAR agonist, ATPA, and antagonist, UBP302.

First, we tested the ability of UBP302 to inhibit the generation of a kainate-driven gamma frequency oscillation in the MEC. Slices were preincubated in UBP302 (10 μM) for 30 minutes. As expected, UBP302 administration caused no neuronal network activity in slices (n = 11) (Figure 3(a)). However, when kainate was applied to slices following preincubation with UBP302, gamma frequency oscillations were generated in all slices (n = 11) (Figure 3(a)). On washout into kainate alone (400 nM), although the frequency of oscillations did not change significantly (in presence of kainate following preincubation with UBP302,  Hz; v. 400 nM kainate alone,  Hz; P > .05; n = 11), oscillations were seen to increase significantly in both peak amplitude (in presence of kainate following preincubation with UBP302, μV2/Hz; v. 400 nM kainate alone, μV2/Hz; P < .05; n = 11) and area power (in presence of kainate following preincubation with UBP302, μV2/Hz.Hz; v. 400 nM kainate alone, μV2/Hz.Hz; P < .05; n = 11) (Figures 3(a), 3(b)).

fig3
Figure 3: Preincubation of slices in UBP302 inhibits the ability of the MEC network to produce kainate-driven gamma frequency oscillations. (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity (i) following preincubation with 10 μM UBP302, (ii) following application of 400 nM kainate onto preincubated slices, and (iii) during a washout period into 400 nM kainate. (b) Pooled power spectra (n = 11) produced from 60 second epochs of extracellular field recorded data, showing a control recording (black), a recording following 10 μM UBP302 preincubation (blue), 400 nM kainate application following preincubation (green), and washout into 400 nM kainate (red). Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.

We next investigated whether gamma frequency oscillations could be generated in the MEC by application of the GLUK5 selective agonist, ATPA. ATPA was bath applied to slices at concentrations of 1 μM, 2 μM, and 5 μM. ATPA induced gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC in the majority of slices to which the agonist was applied (n = 18 out of a total n = 26) (Figure 4(a)). Slices showing gamma oscillations upon ATPA application were observed to be dorsal MEC slices. Upon increasing the concentration of ATPA in slices demonstrating gamma oscillations, the mean frequency, peak amplitude, and area power of oscillations increased (n = 10) (Figures 4(a), 4(b)). The frequency of oscillations increased from  Hz, to  Hz, and to  Hz (n = 10) (Figure 4(b)), the peak amplitude increased from μV2/Hz, to μV2/Hz, and to μV2/Hz (n = 10) (Figure 4(b)), and the power increased from μV2/Hz.Hz, to μV2/Hz.Hz, and to μV2/Hz.Hz, at the respective concentrations of ATPA (1 μM, 2 μM, and 5 μM) (n = 10) (Figure 4(b)). Control readings, taken before ATPA administration, showed that no network activity was spontaneously present in slices (n = 26) (Figure 4(a)i). ATPA-induced gamma frequency oscillations were susceptible to the AMPA/KAR antagonist NBQX (10 μM) (n = 3).

fig4
Figure 4: Activation of GLUK5-containing KARs can induce gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity in a control setting (i) following application of 1 μM, (ii) 2 μM (iii), and 5 μM ATPA (iv). (b) Pooled line graphs (n = 10) demonstrating the effects of varying ATPA concentration on (i) frequency, (ii) area power, and (iii) peak amplitude of gamma oscillations in the MEC. Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.

We next investigated the effect of UBP302 on ATPA-induced gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. Gamma frequency oscillations were induced in slices by bath application of ATPA (2–5 μM) (n = 4) (Figure 5(a)i). UBP302 (10 μM) application caused no significant change in the frequency of gamma oscillations (control,  Hz; v. UBP302,  Hz; P > .1; n = 4) and yet had significant effects on both the peak amplitude (control, μV2/Hz; v. UBP302, μV2/Hz; P < .05; n = 4) and power of oscillations (control, μV2/Hz.Hz; v. UBP302, μV2/Hz.Hz; P < .05; n = 4) (Figures 5(a)ii, 5(b)). The effects of UBP302 on an ATPA-induced gamma frequency oscillations were not reversible on washout (n = 4).

fig5
Figure 5: ATPA-generated gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC are reduced by application of the GLUK5 selective antagonist, UBP302. (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity (i) in the presence of 5 μM ATPA and (ii) following application of 10 μM UBP302. (b) Pooled power spectra (n = 4) produced from 60 second epochs of extracellular field recorded data, showing a control recording (black), recording in the presence of 5 μM ATPA (blue), and application of 10 μM UBP302 (green). Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.
3.4. A role for Homomeric GLUK5-Containing KARs in Gamma Frequency Oscillations

The GLUK5 selective KAR antagonist, NS3763, was used to investigate the contribution of homomeric GLUK5-containing KARs to gamma activity in the MEC. NS3763 selectively antagonises homomeric GLUK5 KARs [39] and experiments were carried out to determine the role of these homomeric receptors in both kainate- and ATPA-induced gamma oscillations.

Application of NS3763 (10–15 μM) caused significant decreases in both peak amplitude (control, μV2/Hz; v. NS3763, μV2/Hz; P < .05; n = 8) and area power (control, μV2/Hz.Hz; v. NS3763, μV2/Hz.Hz; P < .05; n = 8) of kainate-induced gamma oscillations in the MEC (Figures 6(a), 6(b)). However, no effect was seen on the frequency of kainate-generated oscillations (control, Hz; v. NS3763,  Hz; P > .1; n = 8) (Figure 6(b)).

fig6
Figure 6: Blocking homomeric GLUK5-containing KARs significantly reduces kainate-driven gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity (i) in the presence of 400 nM kainate and (ii) following application of 10 μM NS3763. (b) Pooled power spectra (n = 8) produced from 60 second epochs of extracellular field recorded data, showing a control recording (black), recording in the presence of 400 nM kainate (blue), application of 10 μM NS3763 (green), and a washout back into 400 nM kainate (red). Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.

Application of NS3763 (10–15 μM) to slices demonstrating ATPA-induced gamma oscillations caused no significant change in the frequency of oscillations (control,  Hz; v. NS3763,  Hz; P > .1; n = 8) (Figures 7(a), 7(b)). However, the presence of NS3763 caused a significant decrease in both the peak amplitude (control, μV2/Hz; v. NS3763, μV2/Hz; P < .05; n = 8) and area power (control, μV2/Hz.Hz; v. NS3763, μV2/Hz.Hz; P < .05; n = 8) of gamma oscillations (Figures 7(a), 7(b)). The effects of NS3763 on either kainate- or ATPA-induced gamma frequency oscillations were not reversible on washout (n = 12).

fig7
Figure 7: Blocking homomeric GLUK5-containing KARs effectively reduces power and amplitude of ATPA-generated gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity (i) in the presence of 5 μM ATPA and (ii) following application of 15 μM NS3763. (b) Pooled power spectra (n = 4) produced from 60 second epochs of extracellular field recorded data, showing a control recording (black), recording in the presence of 5 μM ATPA (blue), and application of 15 μM NS3763 (green). Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.
3.5. A role for GLUK5-Containing KARs in Carbachol-Induced Gamma Oscillations

Cortical gamma frequency oscillations can also be induced by application of carbachol, an agonist at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) [24, 25, 4549]. It is unclear as to the role of GLUK5-containing KARs in a cholinergic-mediated gamma frequency oscillation in the MEC. Carbachol will cause an increase in the release of glutamate in the form of rhythmic EPSPs [46]. This, in turn, may lead to activation of KARs [50]. In agreement with previous studies in the MEC [24, 25] bath application of carbachol (10–20 μM) generated persistent gamma frequency oscillations (n = 6) (Figure 8(a)i). Application of UBP302 (10 μM) had no significant effect on the frequency (control, Hz; v. UBP302,  Hz; P > .1; n = 6), peak amplitude (control, μV2/Hz; v. UBP302, μV2/Hz; P > .1; n = 6) or power (control, μV2/Hz.Hz; v. UBP302, μV2/Hz.Hz; P > .1; n = 6) of preestablished carbachol-driven gamma oscillations (Figures 8(a)ii, 8(b)). This lack of effect was further demonstrated by washout back into carbachol causing no significant change in observed gamma frequency oscillations (Figures 8(a)iii, 8(b)).

fig8
Figure 8: Carbachol-induced gamma frequency oscillations are not dependent on GLUK5-containing KARs. (a) Extracellular field recordings showing 1 second epochs of activity (i) in the presence of 20 μM carbachol, (ii) following 10 μM UBP302 application, and (iii) during a washout period into 20 μM carbcahol. (b) Pooled power spectra (n = 6) produced from 60 second epochs of extracellular field recorded data, showing a control recording (black), recording in the presence of 20 μM carbachol (blue), application of 10 μM UBP302 (green), and washout back into 20 μM carbachol (red). Scale bar represents 200 milliseconds and 100 μV.

4. Discussion

A number of studies have examined the contribution of various KAR subunits to gamma frequency oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Fisahn et al. [10] focused on the roles of GLUK5 and GLUK6 subunits in kainate-induced hippocampal gamma oscillations, using brain slices from transgenic GLUK5 and GLUK6 receptor knockout mice. Knockout of GLUK5 caused increased sensitivity of the hippocampal network to the effects of kainate and higher susceptibility to oscillatory and epileptogenic activity. Slices from GLUK6-knockout mice could not support kainate-induced gamma oscillations or epileptiform activity, suggesting distinct roles for GLUK5 and GLUK6 subunits in the hippocampus. Fisahn et al. [10] concluded that GLUK5-containing receptors may be expressed on axons of hippocampal interneurons and have a function in inhibitory tone, and that GLUK6-containing KARs may be found in the somatodendritic region of pyramidal cells and interneurons, and provide excitatory drive. Functional receptors of both subtypes must interact to allow generation of stable gamma oscillations in the hippocampus [9, 10].

Subsequently, Brown et al. [51] used pharmacological approaches to investigate the role of GLUK5-containing receptors in hippocampal gamma oscillations. This study used the GLUK5-selective agonists ATPA and iodowillardiine but found that neither could induce gamma network activity in area CA3 of rat hippocampal slices. The GLUK5 selective antagonist, UBP296, when preincubated with hippocampal slices, did not prevent induction of kainate-driven gamma oscillations. However, UBP296 produced an approximately 50% reduction in the power of preestablished kainate-induced gamma frequency oscillations. This paper concluded that GLUK5-containing KARs alone cannot generate gamma oscillations in the hippocampus but may be involved in maintenance of hippocampal gamma activity generated through other KAR subtypes.

In the present study, we have demonstrated that, similarly to in the hippocampus [51], GLUK5-containing KARs in the MEC have a role in the maintenance of kainate-driven oscillations. UBP302, a GLUK5 selective antagonist, caused reductions in peak amplitude and spectral power of preestablished kainate-induced gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. Furthermore, pretreatment of slices with UBP302 partially inhibited generation of kainate-induced gamma frequency oscillations, suggesting that GLUK5-containing KARs are at least partially responsible for the induction of gamma oscillations by kainate application. These data suggest that in the MEC, differently to in the hippocampus [5, 8, 9], activation of GLUK5-containing KARs plays a role in the ability of MEC neuronal networks to generate gamma frequency oscillations. Moreover, in contrast to hippocampal gamma evoked by kainate, MEC gamma generated with GLUK5 agonists demonstrates a frequency increment with increased excitatory drive. This may reflect the manifestation of fundamentally different mechanisms of local circuit gamma oscillation generation in these two regions.

It was not surprising then that application of the GLUK5 subunit selective agonist ATPA [41] successfully evoked gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC. However, care must be taken with interpretation of this data as ATPA has recently been shown not to be entirely selective for GLUK5-containing KARs [40]. In fact, ATPA can activate both homomeric and heteromeric KAR complexes containing GLUK5, and also GLUK6/KA2 heteromeric KARs [48]. Thus, it cannot initially be assumed that these gamma oscillations have been generated via GLUK5-containing receptor complexes, since they could have been induced through GLUK6/KA2 heteromeric receptors. UBP302, however, is an antagonist with selectivity for GLUK5-containing KARs [36, 37]. Whilst UBP302 has been shown to block GLUK7 with an IC50 value of 4 μM—this makes it ~10-fold selective for GLUK5 versus GLUK7—it does not have activity on GLUK6 or GLUK6/KA2 up to 100 μM. Indeed, some controversy surrounds the activity of UBP302 on GLUK7 as it has been reported that UBP302 failed to demonstrate any potent activity in a binding assay on GLUK7 (personal communication, D.E. Jane). In any case, as UBP302 only blocks homomeric GLUK7 and activation of GLUK7 requires very high glutamate concentrations (EC50 value 5.9 mM) [52] it may not be relevant to this study. Application of UBP302 onto slices showing ATPA-generated network activity causes reduced peak amplitude and an approximately 60% reduction in area power of gamma frequency oscillations. This inhibition of ATPA-generated gamma oscillations by UBP302 suggests that the observed activity must, at least in part, be due to activation of GLUK5-containing KARs.

Moreover, NS3763 application caused a significant reduction in peak amplitude and spectral power of preestablished kainate-driven gamma oscillations. This demonstrates that homomeric GLUK5-containing KARs are at least partially responsible for the maintenance of these kainate-driven gamma frequency oscillations. Application of NS3763 to preestablished ATPA-generated oscillations caused an approximately 80% reduction in area power of gamma frequency oscillations and also a reduction in peak amplitude. This suggests that a large component of an ATPA-driven gamma oscillation is maintained through homomeric GLUK5 KARs. The activity of the selective homomeric GLUK5-containing KAR antagonist, NS3763, on both kainate- and ATPA-generated gamma frequency oscillations, tells us that homomeric GLUK5-containing KARs are involved in the observed network activity.

It has been suggested that carbachol-driven activity could cause excess glutamate release and that this overspill of glutamate could activate KARs [50]. The lack of effect of the GLUK5 selective antagonist, UBP302, on carbachol-induced gamma oscillations in the MEC suggests that GLUK5-containing KARs are not involved in the generation or maintenance of gamma oscillations induced via activation of muscarinic cholinergic receptor. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that other KAR subtypes may be involved in these mAChR-mediated gamma oscillations.

We have shown that GLUK5-containing KARs are implicated in the generation and maintenance of gamma frequency oscillations in the MEC evoked by kainate. However, we can only speculate on the cellular localisation of these GLUK5-containing receptors in the MEC. Research performed by Christensen et al. [40] in the hippocampus, suggested likely localisations of KAR subtypes in hippocampal CA1 inhibitory interneurons terminating with pyramidal cells, concluding that heteromeric GLUK6/KA2 receptors are expressed in somatodendritic compartments of interneurons, and that GLUK5 complexes, with either GLUK6 or KA2, are found at presynaptic terminals. It seems likely from our results that in the MEC, both homomeric and heteromeric GLUK5-containing KARs are present.

Presynaptic KARs are involved in regulation and modulation of neurotransmitter release at inhibitory and excitatory synapses in the hippocampus [50, 53, 54]. In contrast, postsynaptic KARs mediate excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in many brain regions [35, 55]. KAR activation in the hippocampus modulates GABA release at terminals of inhibitory interneurons and causes an increase in spontaneous IPSCs but a reduction in the amplitude of these IPSCs impinging on to CA1 interneurons [40]. This suggests that KARs may be present in two distinct populations in hippocampal inhibitory interneurons, and the same may be true of KARs in the MEC [2, 40]. However, other reports have demonstrated that kainate can increase the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous IPSCs, but not action potential-independent miniature IPSCs in stratum radiatum interneurons [56]. Moreover, these authors also observed that kainate can directly depolarise the axonal plexus of inhibitory interneurons producing both increased antidromic and presumably orthodromic spiking. This effect would explain the ability of KAR activation to increase spontaneous but not miniature IPSC activity. The presence of KARs at an axonal loci has been well documented in the hippocampus, most notably in mossy fibres [57, 58].

As outlined in the previous paragraph, there is a large corpus of data on the role of KAR in the hippocampus. However, with respect to the MEC there is a paucity of such information. In order to put the current results presented in this paper into context, future work will concentrate on combining intracellular recordings from individual neurones (pyramidal and interneuron), specific pharmacological KAR tools, and transgenic KAR subunit knockout animals [9, 10] to elucidate the exact nature of cellular expression of KARs in the MEC.

References

  1. M. Hollmann and S. Heinemann, “Cloned glutamate receptors,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 17, pp. 31–108, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. J. Lerma, A. V. Paternain, A. Rodríguez-Moreno, and J. C. López-García, “Molecular physiology of kainate receptors,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 971–998, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. W. Wisden and P. H. Seeburg, “A complex mosaic of high-affinity kainate receptors in rat brain,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 3582–3598, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  4. B. Bettler and C. Mulle, “Neurotransmitter receptors II. AMPA and kainate receptors,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 123–139, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. P. Werner, M. Voigt, K. Keinanen, W. Wisden, and P. H. Seeburg, “Cloning of a putative high-affinity kainate receptor expressed predominantly in hippocampal CA3 cells,” Nature, vol. 351, no. 6329, pp. 742–744, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. A. Herb, N. Burnashev, P. Werner, B. Sakmann, W. Wisden, and P. H. Seeburg, “The KA-2 subunit of excitatory amino acid receptors shows widespread expression in brain and forms ion channels with distantly related subunits,” Neuron, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 775–785, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Chittajallu, S. P. Braithwaite, V. R. J. Clarke, and J. M. Henley, “Kainate receptors: subunits, synaptic localization and function,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. Cui and M. L. Mayer, “Heteromeric kainate receptors formed by the coassembly of GluR5, GluR6, and GluR7,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 8281–8291, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Fisahn, “Kainate receptors and rhythmic activity in neuronal networks: hippocampal gamma oscillations as a tool,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 562, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. A. Fisahn, A. Contractor, R. D. Traub, E. H. Buhl, S. F. Heinemann, and C. J. McBain, “Distinct roles for the kainate receptor subunits GluR5 and GluR6 in kainate-induced hippocampal gamma oscillations,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 43, pp. 9658–9668, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. A. Bragin, G. Jandó, Z. Nádasdy, J. Hetke, K. Wise, and G. Buzsáki, “Gamma (40–100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–60, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. J. Chrobak and G. Buzsáki, “Gamma oscillations in the entorhinal cortex of the freely behaving rat,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 388–398, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Csicsvari, B. Jamieson, K. D. Wise, and G. Buzsáki, “Mechanisms of gamma oscillations in the hippocampus of the behaving rat,” Neuron, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 311–322, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. K. Engel and W. Singer, “Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. Singer, “Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 55, pp. 349–374, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. M. Gray, P. König, A. K. Engel, and W. Singer, “Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties,” Nature, vol. 388, no. 6213, pp. 334–337, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. J. Fell, P. Klaver, K. Lehnertz et al., “Human memory formation is accompanied by rhinal-hippocampal coupling and decoupling,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1259–1264, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. J. Fell, P. Klaver, C. E. Elger, and G. Fernández, “The interaction of rhinal cortex and hippocampus in human declarative memory formation,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 299–312, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. Muller, I. Nikonenko, P. Jourdain, and S. Alberi, “LTP, memory and structural plasticity,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 605–611, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. W. Singer and C. M. Gray, “Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 18, pp. 555–586, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  21. R. D. Traub, N. Spruston, I. Soltesz, A. Konnerth, M. A. Whittington, and J. G. R. Jefferys, “Gamma-frequency oscillations: a neuronal population phenomenon, regulated by synaptic and intrinsic cellular processes, and inducing synaptic plasticity,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 563–575, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. N. Hirai, S. Uchida, T. Maehara, Y. Okubo, and H. Shimizu, “Enhanced gamma (30–150 Hz) frequency in the human medial temporal lobe,” Neuroscience, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1149–1155, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Uchida, T. Maehara, N. Hirai, Y. Okubo, and H. Shimizu, “Cortical oscillations in human medial temporal lobe during wakefulness and all-night sleep,” Brain Research, vol. 891, no. 1-2, pp. 7–19, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Van der Linden, F. Panzica, and M. de Curtis, “Carbachol induces fast oscillations in the medial but not in the lateral entorhinal cortex of the isolated guinea pig brain,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 2441–2450, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  25. C. T. Dickson, G. Biella, and M. de Curtis, “Evidence for spatial modules mediated by temporal synchronization of carbachol-induced gamma rhythm in medial entorhinal cortex,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 7846–7854, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. O. Cunningham, C. H. Davies, E. H. Buhl, N. Kopell, and M. A. Whittington, “Gamma oscillations induced by kainate receptor activation in the entorhinal cortex in vitro,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 30, pp. 9761–9769, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  27. M. O. Cunningham, D. M. Halliday, C. H. Davies, R. D. Traub, E. H. Buhl, and M. A. Whittington, “Coexistence of gamma and high-frequency oscillations in rat medial entorhinal cortex in vitro,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 559, no. 2, pp. 347–353, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  28. M. O. Cunningham, J. Hunt, S. Middleton et al., “Region-specific reduction in entorhinal gamma oscillations and parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in animal models of psychiatric illness,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2767–2776, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  29. M. A. Whittington, R. D. Traub, and J. G. R. Jefferys, “Synchronized oscillation in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation,” Nature, vol. 373, no. 6515, pp. 612–615, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. N. Hájos, J. Pálhalini, E. O. Mann, B. Nèmeth, O. Paulsen, and T. F. Freund, “Spike timing of distinct types of GABAergic interneuron during hippocampal gamma oscillations in vitro,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 41, pp. 9127–9137, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  31. T. Gloveli, T. Dugladze, S. Saha et al., “Differential involvement of oriens/pyramidale interneurones in hippocampal network oscillations in vitro,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 562, no. 1, pp. 131–147, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  32. M. A. Whittington and R. D. Traub, “Interneuron Diversity series: inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations in vitro,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 676–682, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. O. Cunningham, M. A. Whittington, A. Bibbig et al., “A role for fast rhythmic bursting neurons in cortical gamma oscillations in vitro,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 18, pp. 7152–7157, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  34. I. Bureau, S. Bischoff, S. F. Heinemann, and C. Mulle, “Kainate receptor-mediated responses in the CA1 field of wild-type and GluR6-deficient mice,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 653–663, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  35. R. Cossart, M. Esclapez, J. C. Hirsch, C. Bernard, and Y. Ben-Ari, “GluR5 kainate receptor activation in interneurons increases tonic inhibition of pyramidal cells,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 470–478, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  36. J. C. A. More, R. Nistico, N. P. Dolman et al., “Characterisation of UBP296: a novel, potent and selective kainate receptor antagonist,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 46–64, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  37. N. P. Dolman, H. M. Troop, J. C. A. More et al., “Synthesis and pharmacology of willardiine derivatives acting as antagonists of kainate receptors,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 24, pp. 7867–7881, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  38. D. Perrais, P. S. Pineiro, D. E. Jane, and C. Mulle, “Antagonism of recombinant and native GluR7-containing receptors: new tools to study presynaptic kainate receptors,” submitted to Neuropharmacology.
  39. J. K. Christensen, T. Varming, P. K. Ahring, T. D. Jorgensen, and E. O. Nielsen, “In vitro characterisation of 5-carbozyl-2,4-di-benzamido-benzoic acid (NS3763), a non-competitive antagonist of GLUK5 receptors,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Theraputics, vol. 309, pp. 1003–1010, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  40. J. K. Christensen, A. V. Paternain, S. Selak, P. K. Ahring, and J. Lerma, “A mosaic of functional kainate receptors in hippocampal interneurons,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 41, pp. 8986–8993, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  41. V. R. J. Clarke, B. A. Ballyk, K. H. Hoo et al., “A hippocampal GluR5 kainate receptor regulating inhibitory synaptic transmission,” Nature, vol. 389, no. 6651, pp. 599–603, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  42. V. R. J. Clarke and G. L. Collingridge, “Characterisation of the effects of ATPA, a GLUK5 receptor selective agonist, on excitatory synaptic transmission in area CA1 of rat hippocampal slices,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 889–902, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. V. R. J. Clarke and G. L. Collingridge, “Characterisation of the effects of ATPA, a GLUK5 kainate receptor agonist, on GABAergic synaptic transmission in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 363–372, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  44. S. L. Campbell, S. S. Mathew, and J. J. Hablitz, “Pre- and postsynaptic effects of kainate on layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat neocortex,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  45. A. Fisahn, F. G. Pike, E. H. Buhl, and O. Paulsen, “Cholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40 Hz in the hippocampus in vitro,” Nature, vol. 394, no. 6689, pp. 186–189, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  46. R. D. Traub, A. Bibbig, A. Fisahn, F. E. N. Lebeau, M. A. Whittington, and E. H. Buhl, “A model of gamma-frequency network oscillations induced in the rat CA3 region by carbachol in vitro,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 4093–4106, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. S. G. Hormuzdi, I. Pais, F. E. N. LeBeau et al., “Impaired electrical signaling disrupts gamma frequency oscillations in connexin 36-deficient mice,” Neuron, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 487–495, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. J. Pálhalmi, O. Paulsen, T. F. Freund, and N. Hájos, “Distinct properties of carbachol- and DHPG-induced network oscillations in hippocampal slices,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 381–389, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  49. E. O. Mann, J. M. Suckling, N. Hajos, S. A. Greenfield, and O. Paulsen, “Perisomatic feedback inhibition underlies cholinergically induced fast network oscillations in the rat hippocampus in vitro,” Neuron, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 105–117, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  50. S. E. Lauri, M. Segerstråle, A. Vesikansa et al., “Endogenous activation of kainate receptors regulates glutamate release and network activity in the developing hippocampus,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 4473–4484, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  51. J. T. Brown, A. Teriakidis, and A. D. Randall, “A pharmacological investigation of the role of GLUK5-containing receptors in kainate-driven hippocampal gamma band oscillations,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  52. H. H. Schiffer, G. T. Swanson, and S. F. Heinemann, “Rat GluR7 and a carboxy-terminal splice variant, GluR7b, are functional kainate receptor subunits with a low sensitivity to glutamate,” Neuron, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1141–1146, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. A. Contractor, G. Swanson, and S. F. Heinemann, “Kainate receptors are involved in short- and long-term plasticity at mossy fiber synapses in the hippocampus,” Neuron, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 209–216, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. A. Contractor, A. W. Sailer, M. Darstein et al., “Loss of kainate receptor-mediated heterosynaptic facilitation of mossy-fiber synapses in KA2/ mice,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 422–429, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  55. M. Vignes and G. L. Collingridge, “The synaptic activation of kainate receptors,” Nature, vol. 388, no. 6638, pp. 179–182, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  56. A. Semyanov and D. M. Kullmann, “Kainate receptor-dependent axonal depolarization and action potential initiation in interneurons,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 718–723, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  57. H. Kamiya and S. Ozawa, “Kainate receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition at the mouse hippocampal mossy fibre synapse,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 523, no. 3, pp. 653–665, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. D. Schmitz, M. Frerking, and R. A. Nicoll, “Synaptic activation of presynaptic kainate receptors on hippocampal mossy fiber synapses,” Neuron, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 327–338, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar