Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 426069 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/426069

Juhyun Song, Joohyun Park, Yumi Oh, Jong Eun Lee, "Glutathione Suppresses Cerebral Infarct Volume and Cell Death after Ischemic Injury: Involvement of FOXO3 Inactivation and Bcl2 Expression", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 426069, 11 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/426069

Glutathione Suppresses Cerebral Infarct Volume and Cell Death after Ischemic Injury: Involvement of FOXO3 Inactivation and Bcl2 Expression

Academic Editor: Francisco Javier Romero
Received04 Dec 2014
Revised18 Jan 2015
Accepted27 Jan 2015
Published04 Feb 2015

Abstract

Ischemic stroke interrupts the flow of blood to the brain and subsequently results in cerebral infarction and neuronal cell death, leading to severe pathophysiology. Glutathione (GSH) is an antioxidant with cellular protective functions, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging in the brain. In addition, GSH is involved in various cellular survival pathways in response to oxidative stress. In the present study, we examined whether GSH reduces cerebral infarct size after middle cerebral artery occlusion in vivo and the signaling mechanisms involved in the promotion of cell survival after GSH treatment under ischemia/reperfusion conditions in vitro. To determine whether GSH reduces the extent of cerebral infarction, cell death after ischemia, and reperfusion injury, we measured infarct size in ischemic brain tissue and the expression of claudin-5 associated with brain infarct formation. We also examined activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, inactivation of FOXO3, and expression of Bcl2 to assess the role of GSH in promoting cell survival in response to ischemic injury. Based on our results, we suggest that GSH might improve the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke by attenuating cerebral infarction and cell death.

1. Introduction

Ischemic stroke resulting from obstruction of a blood vessel supplying the brain, a major cause of morbidity and mortality [1], leads to disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which subsequently causes vasogenic edema [24] and neuronal cell death [5]. Reperfusion after occlusion induces water entry through endothelial cells, resulting in cerebral infarction and further increases in BBB permeability [6, 7]. This reperfusion influences brain tissue by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [8], which contributes to oxidative stress. Glutathione (L-c-glutamyl-L-cysteinylglycine; GSH) is an intracellular thiol tripeptide present in all mammalian tissues that plays a crucial role in cellular protection against oxidant damage [9]. A decrease in cellular GSH induces the release of cytochrome c, and the redox environment thus triggers the apoptotic signaling pathway [10, 11]. In addition, a deficiency of GSH is associated with a variety of central nervous system diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease [12], Parkinson’s disease [13], and stroke [14, 15]. The BBB is a structural and functional barrier that regulates the exchange of many metabolites from circulating blood to brain tissue [16]. In cerebral ischemia, the BBB is disrupted, leading to brain infarction and secondary brain damage [17]. Oxidative stress following stroke results in metabolic dysfunction causing ROS accumulation [18]. GSH is reported to have a protective effect against brain vascular endothelial dysfunction, including endothelial barrier permeability [19], cell death [20], and the scavenging of ROS [21]. GSH depletion elicits endothelial oxidative stress and cell apoptosis [20, 22]. Some clinical studies demonstrate that an increased risk for stroke is associated with low levels of GSH in the brain [23, 24]. Forkhead box O (FOXO), from the O type subfamily of the forkhead transcription factor superfamily [25], regulates a series of downstream targets and is thereby involved in diverse cellular functions including the regulation of cell permeability [2528]. Furthermore, hypoxia stress resulting from stroke triggers FOXO3-mediated dysfunction of the BBB [29]. FOXO transcriptional factors are associated with multiple mechanisms in response to oxidative stress [30], including activation of the cellular apoptotic pathway [31], several ROS-regulated mechanisms [32], and upregulation of several antioxidant enzymes such as manganese superoxide dismutase [33, 34]. FOXO3 transcription factors are downstream effectors of PI3K/Akt [35, 36]. The activity of FOXO is modulated by the phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination of PI3K/Akt [34]. FOXO phosphorylation is mainly induced through the PI3K-mediated Akt pathway, which is known to have a crucial role in cell cycle arrest and cell survival [32]. Also, FOXO3 is associated with the expression of Bcl2, which is an important antiapoptotic protein [37] in cellular protection against oxidative stress [38, 39]. In the present study, we investigated whether GSH reduces infarct size, the association of GSH with the PI3K/Akt pathway, and the influence of GSH on the expression of FOXO3 and Bcl2 after ischemic injury. Our results indicate that GSH might inhibit the effects of cerebral infarction and boost antiapoptotic signaling after ischemic stroke, suggesting that GSH may be a potent therapeutic antioxidant that can attenuate severe pathologies after ischemic stroke.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (Orient, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea; 8 weeks old; 250–260 g) were subject to transient focal cerebral ischemia by intraluminal middle cerebral artery blockade with a nylon suture, as previously described [40]. After 60 min of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), blood flow was restored by withdrawing the suture, and regional cerebral blood flow was monitored using a laser Doppler flow meter (Transonic Systems, Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA). All animal procedures and experiments were performed in accordance with the Guide to the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. We used at least 5 rats in all groups for study. Each measurement included 5 repeats per animal.

2.2. Drug Treatments

For each experiment, rats were given anesthesia (chloral hydrate, 300 mg/kg, intravenous infusion (i.v.)). GSH (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in normal saline (pH 7.5). Rats were injected with GSH (500 mg/kg/mL, i.v.) 10 min after MCAO occlusion [41]. Control rats were given an equal volume of saline using the same procedure.

2.3. Evaluation of Infarct Volume

For evaluation of brain edema, rats were sacrificed at reperfusion 24 hr after MCAO injury. Brain slices (2-mm thick) between −22.00 mm and +4.00 mm relative to Bregma were incubated with 2% 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37°C for 10 min in the dark in a drying oven and later photographed using a Nikon E 950 digital camera attached to a dissecting microscope. Infarct volume was determined from digitized images using the Quantity One software package (Bio-Rad, Philadelphia, PA, USA). Typically, 5 slices were used for analysis.

2.4. Cresyl Violet Staining

At reperfusion 24 hr after MCAO injury, rats were sacrificed, and brains were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde and quickly frozen. Tissues were sectioned (20 μm) coronally and sequentially dipped into xylene for 5 min, 100% alcohol for 5 min, 95% alcohol for 5 min, and 70% alcohol for 5 min. Sections were stained with cresyl violet (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 3 min. After staining, slides were reacted with 70% alcohol for 5 min, 95% alcohol for 5 min, 100% alcohol for 5 min, and xylene for 5 min. Sections were then observed under a microscope equipped with a digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.5. Immunohistochemistry

Frozen brain sections (5 μm) were cut onto clean glass slides (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), air-dried, and fixed in cold acetone for 10 min at −20°C. The slides were first washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and then incubated with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Followed by a series of washes (three times with distilled water), the sections were blocked with 10% normal rabbit serum. Frozen brain sections (5 μm) were fixed in ice-cold acetone for 20 min. To block nonspecific labeling, sections were incubated in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min before addition of primary and secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies for claudin-5 (1 : 50; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were applied to the samples for 24 hr at 4°C followed by a 90-min incubation with appropriate fluorescent secondary antibody (1 : 100; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and three washes in PBS for 10 min each. After three washes in 0.1% PBS with Tween-20 (PBST), the sections were incubated with rhodamine-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit or FITC-conjugated sheep anti-mouse secondary antibody diluted to 1 : 200 with 5% BSA fraction V in 0.1% PBST for 2 hr in the dark at room temperature. After three washes in PBS, sections were incubated with 1 μg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 2 μg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for counterstaining. Tissues were then visualized under a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 700, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The percentages of relative intensity were measured by using Image J as by referring the previous study [42].

2.6. Cell Culture

Murine brain endothelial cells (bEnd.3 cells; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Hyclone Laboratories, South Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, South Logan, UT, USA) and 100 units/mL penicillin/streptomycin (Hyclone Laboratories, South Logan, UT, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere in the presence of 5% CO2 [43]. bEND.3 cells were used after 13 passages.

2.7. Hypoxia and Reperfusion (H/R) Injury

Confluent cells were transferred to an anaerobic chamber (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (O2 tension, 0.1%) and washed three times with PBS. Then, culture medium was replaced with deoxygenated, glucose-free balanced salt solution, and cells were incubated for 6 hr. Following hypoxia injury, cells were incubated for 18 hr under normal growth conditions with or without drug treatment [44].

2.8. Drug Treatment

GSH (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in ethanol. An equivalent volume of ethanol (final: 0.01%) or water was added to control and all GSH-containing wells. bEnd.3 cells were exposed to 1 mM GSH for 3 hr before H/R injury (this concentration was chosen to study the cellular protective effect of GSH against H/R injury based on the results of our previous study). The present study consisted of four groups of cells. Normal control (NC) cells were cultured with nontreated media without H/R injury, experimental control (EC) cells were cultured in nontreated medium for 18 hr after 6 hr of H/R injury, and 1 mM GSH cells were pretreated with 1 mM GSH for 3 hr before 6 hr of H/R injury. Cells were then cultured in nontreated medium for 18 hr. Cells in the Akt inhibitor group were treated with 100 nM Akt inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) 3 hr before H/R injury.

2.9. Determination of Intracellular ROS

The level of intracellular ROS for each treatment group was measured using a fluorescent probe, 2′, 7′ -dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), as previously described [45]. Cells were plated at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL and treated with GSH for 24 hr. After GSH pretreatment, H/R was performed. Then, bEND.3 cells were treated with 5 μM DCF-DA for 30 min at 37°C. After washing with PBS, fluorescence was measured with a microscope (Nikon TS100-F ECLIPSE) equipped with a CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics) [43].

2.10. Western Blot Analysis

After GSH pretreatment, H/R injury, and restoration, cells were washed rapidly with ice-cold PBS, scraped, and collected. Cell pellets were lysed with ice-cold RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The lysates were centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 1 hr at 4°C to produce whole-cell extracts. Protein content was quantified using the BCA method (Pierce, IL, USA). Protein (20 μg) was separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin prepared in TBS/Tween (20 nM Tris (pH 7.2), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 hr at room temperature, immunoblots were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies that specifically detect phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K; 1 : 2000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), Akt (1 : 2000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt; 1 : 2000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), or β-actin (1 : 2000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). Blots were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse or -rabbit IgG antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 1 hr at room temperature. Enhanced chemiluminescence was performed by ECL (Pierce, IL, USA) [43].

2.11. RT-PCR

To examine the expression of Bcl2 in GSH-pretreated b.END3 cells under hypoxic conditions, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using Bcl2 primers. Briefly, samples were lysed with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA synthesis from mRNA and sample normalization was performed. PCR was performed using the following thermal cycling conditions: 10 min at 95°C; 40 cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 65°C for 30 sec, and elongation at 72°C for 30 sec; final extension at 72°C for 10 min; and holding at 4°C. PCR was performed using the following primers (5′ to 3′): Bcl2 (F): AAGCTGTCACAGAGGGGCTA, (R): CAGGCTGGAAGGAGAAGATG; GAPDH (F): GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG, (R): TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC. PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 18.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. The statistical significance of group differences was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc multiple comparison tests. The statistical significance of differences from the MCAO group (i.e., EC group) was determined by t-tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at . (, )

3. Results

3.1. GSH Reduced Infarct Volume following Cerebral Ischemia

To investigate whether GSH affects vascular permeability in the animal brain, we measured infarct volume at reperfusion 24 hr after MCAO injury using TTC staining (Figure 1(a)). White areas indicate damaged brain areas due to ischemia (Figure 1(a)). We sacrificed 6 rats in all groups. The graph shows the percentage of injured ipsilateral hemisphere relative to uninjured ipsilateral hemisphere for the MCAO and GSH groups (Figure 1(b)). The percentage of infarcted area in the MCAO group was >17%, whereas the percentage of brain edema after GSH treatment was <8%. Infarct volume (%) was significantly reduced in the GSH group compared with the MCAO group. This graph included the observation results of 5 repeats per animal. Our findings indicate that GSH treatment reduced cerebral infarct volume after ischemic brain injury.

3.2. Assessment of GSH-Induced Morphological Alterations Using Cresyl Violet Staining

Cresyl violet staining was performed at reperfusion 24 hr after MCAO injury to assess the extent of ischemia-induced damage in the striatum and cortex (Figure 2). In the NC group (without MCAO injury or GSH treatment), intact cellular structure was observed in both the cortex and striatum. In the MCAO group (i.e., EC group), small, shrunken cell bodies and damaged tissue was observed in the ischemic cortex and striatum (Figure 2). In the GSH-treated group (GSH treatment and MCAO injury), damaged cells were fewer in number compared with the EC group, and we observed healthy round cells in the ischemic cortex and striatum (Figure 2). This result included 5 repeats observation result per animal.

3.3. GSH Prevents BBB Disruption following Cerebral Ischemia

We conducted immunohistochemistry using claudin-5 antibody at reperfusion 24 hr after MCAO injury to examine changes in the expression of this BBB junction protein in the cortex (Figure 3(a)) and striatum (Figure 3(b)). In the NC group, claudin-5 was considerably expressed in both the cortex (Figure 3(a)) and striatum (Figure 3(b)). However, claudin-5 expression was attenuated in both the cortex (Figure 3(a)) and striatum (Figure 3(b)) at reperfusion 24 hr after MCAO injury (EC group). In the GSH-treated group, claudin-5 expression was increased in both the cortex (Figure 3(a)) and striatum (Figure 3(b)) compared with the EC group. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) graphs expressed the relative intensity compared to the normal control group (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)). The relative intensity was measured by using Image J by following the previous study [42] to show to the differences of claudin-5 expression between groups in spite of indirect quantification method. These results included 5 repeats per animal. Based on these results, we suggest that GSH may inhibit the degradation of claudin-5 in the ischemic brain and protect against BBB disruption.

3.4. GSH Decreases H/R-Induced ROS Production

We measured ROS levels using DCF-DA reagent, a fluorescent dye that visualizes ROS, in b.END3 cells. DCF-DA-positive cells increased in number after H/R injury. ROS levels in the 1 mM GSH pretreatment group were not largely different from those in the NC group. In the H/R injury group, ROS levels were increased compared with those in the NC group. This increase was partially blocked by pretreatment with 1 mM GSH (Figure 4). The H/R injury group with 1 mM GSH pretreatment showed a clear decrease in the number of DCF-DA-positive cells compared with the H/R injury group. This result suggests that GSH inhibits H/R-induced ROS production in b.END3 cells.

3.5. GSH Attenuates the Death of b.END3 Cells after H/R Injury via PI3K/Akt Activation and FOXO3 Inactivation

To investigate whether PI3K/Akt signaling is activated in H/R-induced stress, we first measured the expression of PI3K by western blot analysis (Figure 5(a)), as PI3K expression correlates with the activation of cell survival signaling. H/R-injured cells showed an obvious suppression of PI3K expression, whereas PI3K activation in H/R-injured cells with 1 mM GSH pretreatment was not largely different from that in the EC group (Figure 5(a)). Next, we examined the phosphorylation of Akt by western blot analysis (Figure 5(b)). Phosphorylation of Akt is associated with activation of Akt signaling and cell survival. Our results suggest that the expression of phosphorylated Akt protein in the EC group is attenuated compared with that in the NC group. The relative portion of phosphorylated Akt in the 1 mM GSH group was similar to that in the EC group. However, expression of phosphorylated Akt in the 1 mM GSH treatment group was higher than that in the EC group (Figure 5(b)). In addition, more translocation of FOXO3 occurred in the GSH-treated group than in the EC group despite the same H/R injury (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). These results show that GSH may activate PI3K/Akt signaling and inhibit the activation of FOXO3 in H/R-injured brain endothelial cells.

3.6. GSH Promotes the Expression of Bcl2 after H/R Injury

To examine whether PI3K/Akt signaling contributes to the expression of Bcl2 in H/R injury, we measured the mRNA level of Bcl2 by RT-PCR (Figure 7), as Bcl2 correlates with activation of cell survival signaling. H/R-injured cells showed an obvious suppression of Bcl2 expression, whereas Bcl2 activation in H/R-injured cells with 1 mM GSH pretreatment was markedly higher than that in the EC group (Figure 7). Under the situation that the activation of Akt was inhibited by an Akt inhibitor, Bcl2 expression was further reduced by GSH pretreatment in H/R-injured cells (Figure 7). These results show that GSH may activate PI3K/Akt signaling and thereby promote the expression of Bcl2 as a modulator of cell survival in H/R-injured b.END3 cells.

4. Discussion

Ischemic stroke causes brain damage and alterations in GSH redox status [46, 47]. Cerebral infarction volume following ischemic stroke is increased in GSH-deficient mice [48, 49]. In the present in vivo study, we demonstrated that GSH reduces brain infarct volume after MCAO injury in the rat brain. Junction proteins such as cadherins, α-catenin, occluding, claudin, and β-catenin are components of the BBB [50]. When the brain is exposed to stress, the first barrier is brain endothelial cells sealed by tight junctions [51], which form a junction complex between endothelial cells [52, 53]. The endothelial cells connected by junction proteins play a critical role in maintaining the integrity of the BBB to protect the brain [54], and tight proteins regulate paracellular permeability [55]. The results of the present study suggest that GSH preserves the loss of the tight junction protein claudin-5 after MCAO injury. Moreover, to determine the specific mechanism underlying the cellular protection provided by GSH, we investigated the cellular mechanism through in vitro experiments. In ischemic stress, the increased production of ROS in the brain triggers signaling cascades leading to inflammation, apoptosis, and ultimately memory and motor deficits [56]. The appropriate regulation of ROS by cellular antioxidant redox enzymes such as GSH is essential to prevent oxidative stress-induced brain damage [57]. In the present in vitro experiments, we confirmed that GSH attenuates the production of ROS in brain endothelial cells after ischemic injury. Hypoxia induces FOXO3-mediated dysfunction of the BBB [29]. Therefore, we investigated the activation of FOXO3, which is associated with disruption of the BBB [29] and increased proapoptotic gene expression [58], as well as the activation of PI3K/Akt signaling, which is an upstream target of FOXO3 transcription [58, 59] and a cell survival pathway [60, 61]. FOXO3 modulates diverse cellular and physiological mechanisms including metabolism, apoptosis, and cellular longevity [34, 6264]. The H2O2-induced decrease in cell viability is mediated by a FOXO3-dependent mechanism [65]. Deacetylation of FOXO3 protects mitochondria against oxidative stress by boosting mitochondrial homoeostasis [66] and reduces the production of cellular ROS [67, 68]. FOXO3 mediates ROS-induced apoptosis through the expression of ROS scavenging enzymes [69]. In the present study, we found decreased activation of FOXO3 translocation into the nucleus in the GSH-treated MCAO injury group. This reduction may be related to a decreased production of ROS by GSH treatment. In addition, one study demonstrated that FOXO3 increases hypoxia-induced BBB hyperpermeability [29]. Recent studies show that hypoxic conditions promote the translocation of FOXO3 into the nucleus of endothelial cells [29, 70] and increases FOXO3, triggering hypoxia-induced degradation of junction proteins such as VE-cadherin and claudin-5 [29]. Based on our results, GSH may prevent the degradation of the tight junction protein claudin-5 following ischemic stroke, which may involve the reduced translocation of FOXO3 into the nucleus. Moreover, phosphorylation of FOXO by Akt leads to the holding of FOXO in the cytoplasm and the blockade of target gene transcription [35]. Akt promotes cell survival by regulating FOXO transcription factors [71]. Activation of FOXO3 also induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in endothelial cells by suppressing heat shock protein 70 expression [72, 73]. Activation of FOXO3 causes an increased expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl2 [37]. In addition, overexpression of Bcl2 leads to an increase in the cellular content of GSH [74, 75]. By contrast, Bcl2 deficient-mice show reduced GSH levels in brain tissue and exhibit an increased risk of neuronal cell death [76]. Considering the results of the present study, we assume that an increased expression of Bcl2 may protect brain tissue from damage due to ischemic stroke. Briefly, we suggest three possibilities: (1) GSH attenuates cerebral infarct volume after ischemic stroke, (2) GSH preserves the disruption of BBB after ischemic injury, and (3) GSH improves the survival of brain endothelial cells by promoting the PI3K/Akt pathway, inhibiting the translocation of FOXO3 into the nucleus, and boosting the expression of Bcl2. Thus, we thought that this study would provide the basic data to understand the role of GSH in ischemic stroke. Ultimately, we suggest the need for further study regarding the role of GSH in alleviating severe brain pathologies caused by ischemic stroke.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (NRF-2014R1A2A2A01006556).

References

  1. Y. Zhang, P. Zhang, X. Shen et al., “Early exercise protects the blood-brain barrier from ischemic brain injury via the regulation of MMP-9 and occludin in rats,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 11096–11112, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. W. Unterberg, J. Stover, B. Kress, and K. L. Kiening, “Edema and brain trauma,” Neuroscience, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 1021–1029, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. M. Simard, T. A. Kent, M. Chen, K. V. Tarasov, and V. Gerzanich, “Brain oedema in focal ischaemia: molecular pathophysiology and theoretical implications,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 258–268, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Loreto and E. Reggio, “Aquaporin and vascular diseases,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. C. Risher, R. D. Andrew, and S. A. Kirov, “Real-time passive volume responses of astrocytes to acute osmotic and ischemic stress in cortical slices and in vivo revealed by two-photon microscopy,” Glia, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 207–221, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Hirt, B. Ternon, M. Price, N. Mastour, J. F. Brunet, and J. Badaut, “Protective role of early Aquaporin 4 induction against postischemic edema formation,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 423–433, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Strbian, A. Durukan, M. Pitkonen et al., “The blood-brain barrier is continuously open for several weeks following transient focal cerebral ischemia,” Neuroscience, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 175–181, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Sarkaki, M. Rafieirad, S. E. Hossini et al., “Improvement in memory and brain long-term potentiation deficits due to permanent hypoperfusion/ischemia by grape seed extract in rats,” Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1004–1010, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. E. Cadenas, “Mitochondrial free radical production and cell signaling,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1-2, pp. 17–26, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. Q. Schafer and G. R. Buettner, “Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1191–1212, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Cai and D. P. Jones, “Superoxide in apoptosis. Mitochondrial generation triggered by cytochrome c loss,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 19, pp. 11401–11404, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Ansari and S. W. Scheff, “Oxidative stress in the progression of Alzheimer disease in the frontal cortex,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 155–167, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Merad-Boudia, A. Nicole, D. Santiard-Baron, C. Saillé, and I. Ceballos-Picot, “Mitochondrial impairment as an early event in the process of apoptosis induced by glutathione depletion in neuronal cells: relevance to Parkinson's disease,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 645–655, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. M. Cojocaru, M. Cojocaru, V. Sapira, and A. Ionescu, “Evaluation of oxidative stress in patients with acute ischemic stroke,” Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 97–106, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  15. K. van Leyen, H. Y. Kim, S. R. Lee, G. Jin, K. Arai, and E. H. Lo, “Baicalein and 12/15-lipoxygenase in the ischemic brain,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 3014–3018, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. N. J. Abbott, A. A. K. Patabendige, D. E. M. Dolman, S. R. Yusof, and D. J. Begley, “Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. Jin, Z. Song, S. Yu et al., “Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase gamma plays a central role in blood-brain barrier dysfunction in acute experimental stroke,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 2033–2044, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. Ahmed and W. H. Tang, “Pharmacologic strategies to target oxidative stress in heart failure,” Current Heart Failure Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. V. Usatyuk, S. Vepa, T. Watkins, D. He, N. L. Parinandi, and V. Natarajan, “Redox regulation of reactive oxygen species-induced p38 MAP kinase activation and barrier dysfunction in lung microvascular endothelial cells,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 723–730, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Okouchi, N. Okayama, and T. Y. Aw, “Preservation of cellular glutathione status and mitochondrial membrane potential by N-acetylcysteine and insulin sensitizers prevent carbonyl stress-induced human brain endothelial cell apoptosis,” Current Neurovascular Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 267–278, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. K. Biswas, D. E. Newby, I. Rahman, and I. L. Megson, “Depressed glutathione synthesis precedes oxidative stress and atherogenesis in Apo-E-/- mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 338, no. 3, pp. 1368–1373, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Takahashi, R. Tatsunami, T. Oba, and Y. Tampo, “Buthionine sulfoximine promotes methylglyoxal-induced apoptotic cell death and oxidative stress in endothelial cells,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 556–560, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Namba, Y. Takeda, K. Sunami, and M. Hirakawa, “Temporal profiles of the levels of endogenous antioxidants after four-vessel occlusion in rats,” Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 131–137, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E.-M. Park, J.-H. Choi, J.-S. Park, M.-Y. Han, and Y.-M. Park, “Measurement of glutathione oxidation and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine accumulation in the gerbil hippocampus following global ischemia,” Brain Research Protocols, vol. 6, no. 1-2, pp. 25–32, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Q. Xie, J. Chen, and Z. Yuan, “Post-translational regulation of FOXO,” Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 897–901, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. S. Beard, R. J. Haines, K. Y. Wu et al., “Non-muscle Mlck is required for beta-catenin- and FoxO1-dependent downregulation of Cldn5 in IL-1beta-mediated barrier dysfunction in brain endothelial cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 1840–1853, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Fukunaga and N. Shioda, “Pathophysiological relevance of forkhead transcription factors in brain ischemia,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 665, pp. 130–142, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Zhou, Q. Cao, Y. Peng et al., “FoxO4 inhibits NF-kappaB and protects mice against colonic injury and inflammation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 1403–1414, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S.-W. Hyun and Y.-S. Jung, “Hypoxia induces FoxO3a-mediated dysfunction of blood-brain barrier,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 450, no. 4, pp. 1638–1642, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Sengupta, J. D. Molkentin, J.-H. Paik, R. A. DePinho, and K. E. Yutzey, “FoxO transcription factors promote cardiomyocyte survival upon induction of oxidative stress,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 9, pp. 7468–7478, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Stahl, P. F. Dijkers, G. J. P. L. Kops et al., “The forkhead transcription factor FoxO regulates transcription of p27Kip1 and Bim in response to IL-2,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 10, pp. 5024–5031, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Storz, “Forkhead homeobox type O transcription factors in the responses to oxidative stress,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 593–605, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. J. P. L. Kops, T. B. Dansen, P. E. Polderman et al., “Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress,” Nature, vol. 419, no. 6904, pp. 316–321, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. van der Horst and B. M. T. Burgering, “Stressing the role of FoxO proteins in lifespan and disease,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 440–450, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Brunet, A. Bonni, M. J. Zigmond et al., “Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a forkhead transcription factor,” Cell, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 857–868, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Skurk, Y. Izumiya, H. Maatz et al., “The FOXO3a transcription factor regulates cardiac myocyte size downstream of AKT signaling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 21, pp. 20814–20823, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. W. Chung, J. H. Lim, M. Y. Kim et al., “High-fat diet-induced renal cell apoptosis and oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rat are ameliorated by fenofibrate through the PPARα-FoxO3a-PGC-1α pathway,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2213–2225, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. Holm and O. Isacson, “Factors intrinsic to the neuron can induce and maintain its ability to promote axonal outgrowth: a role for BCL2?” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 269–273, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. C. Reed, K. S. Doctor, and A. Godzik, “The domains of apoptosis: a genomics perspective,” Science's STKE, vol. 2004, no. 239, article re9, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  40. A. Selvamani and F. Sohrabji, “The neurotoxic effects of estrogen on ischemic stroke in older female rats is associated with age-dependent loss of insulin-like growth factor-1,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 6852–6861, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. J. Schauer, S. Kalmuk, A. L. Gerbes et al., “Intravenous administration of glutathione protects parechymal and non-paranchymal liver cells against reperfusion injury following rat liver transplantation,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 864–870, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  42. F. Papadopulos, M. Spinelli, S. Valente et al., “Common tasks in microscopic and ultrastructural image analysis using ImageJ,” Ultrastructural Pathology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 401–407, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H.-J. Jung, Y.-H. Jeon, K. K. Bokara et al., “Agmatine promotes the migration of murine brain endothelial cells via multiple signaling pathways,” Life Sciences, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Z. Y. Mei, C. M. Chin, J. C. Yoon et al., “Agmatine inhibits matrix metalloproteinase-9 via endothelial nitric oxide synthase in cerebral endothelial cells,” Neurological Research, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 749–754, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. A. Royall and H. Ischiropoulos, “Evaluation of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin and dihydrorhodamine 123 as fluorescent probes for intracellular H2O2 in cultured endothelial cells,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 348–355, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. T. Mizui, H. Kinouchi, and P. H. Chan, “Depletion of brain glutathione by buthionine sulfoximine enhances cerebral ischemic injury in rats,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. H313–H317, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  47. H. Shimizu, Y. Kiyohara, I. Kato et al., “Relationship between plasma glutathione levels and cardiovascular disease in a defined population: the Hisayama study,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2072–2077, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. P. J. Crack, J. M. Taylor, N. J. Flentjar et al., “Increased infarct size and exacerbated apoptosis in the glutathione peroxidase-1 (Gpx-1) knockout mouse brain in response to ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1389–1399, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Mitsios, J. Gaffney, J. Krupinski et al., “Expression of signaling molecules associated with apoptosis in human ischemic stroke tissue,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. B. T. Hawkins and T. P. Davis, “The blood-brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 173–185, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A.-C. Luissint, C. Federici, F. Guillonneau et al., “Guanine nucleotide-binding protein Galphai2: a new partner of claudin-5 that regulates tight junction integrity in human brain endothelial cells,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 860–873, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. A. Petty and E. H. Lo, “Junctional complexes of the blood-brain barrier: permeability changes in neuroinflammation,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 311–323, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. C. M. Niessen, “Tight junctions/adherens junctions: basic structure and function,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 127, no. 11, pp. 2525–2532, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. M. Romanic, R. F. White, A. J. Arleth, E. H. Ohlstein, and F. C. Barone, “Matrix metalloproteinase expression increases after cerebral focal ischemia in rats: inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9 reduces infarct size,” Stroke, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1020–1030, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. W.-Y. Liu, Z.-B. Wang, L.-C. Zhang, X. Wei, and L. Li, “Tight junction in blood-brain barrier: an overview of structure, regulation, and regulator substances,” CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 609–615, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. U. Dirnagl, C. Iadecola, and M. A. Moskowitz, “Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 391–397, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. B. Toledano, I. Kullik, F. Trinh, P. T. Baird, T. D. Schneider, and G. Storz, “Redox-dependent shift of OxyR-DNA contacts along an extended DNA-binding site: a mechanism for differential promoter selection,” Cell, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 897–909, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Furuyama, T. Nakazawa, I. Nakano, and N. Mori, “Identification of the differential distribution patterns of mRNAs and consensus binding sequences for mouse DAF-16 homologues,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 349, no. 2, pp. 629–634, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. Nakae, B. C. Park, and D. Accili, “Insulin stimulates phosphorylation of the forkhead transcription factor FKHR on serine 253 through a wortmannin-sensitive pathway,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 23, pp. 15982–15985, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. Accili and K. C. Arden, “FoxOs at the crossroads of cellular metabolism, differentiation, and transformation,” Cell, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 421–426, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. X. Zhang, N. Tang, T. J. Hadden, and A. K. Rishi, “Akt, FoxO and regulation of apoptosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1813, no. 11, pp. 1978–1986, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. D. R. Calnan and A. Brunet, “The FoxO code,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 2276–2288, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. O. Puig and J. Mattila, “Understanding forkhead box class o function: lessons from Drosophila melanogaster,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 635–647, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. P. K. Vogt, H. Jiang, and M. Aoki, “Triple layer control: phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination of FOXO proteins,” Cell Cycle, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 908–913, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. F. Wang, Y.-Q. Wang, Q. Cao et al., “Hydrogen peroxide induced impairment of endothelial progenitor cell viability is mediated through a FoxO3a dependant mechanism,” Microvascular Research, vol. 90, pp. 48–54, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. H. H. Tseng, S.-S. Shieh, and D. L. Wang, “SIRT3 deacetylates FOXO3 to protect mitochondria against oxidative damage,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 63, pp. 222–234, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. N. R. Sundaresan, M. Gupta, G. Kim, S. B. Rajamohan, A. Isbatan, and M. P. Gupta, “Sirt3 blocks the cardiac hypertrophic response by augmenting Foxo3a-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 9, pp. 2758–2771, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. K. M. Jacobs, J. D. Pennington, K. S. Bisht et al., “SIRT3 interacts with the daf-16 homolog FOXO3a in the mitochondria, as well as increases FOXO3a dependent gene expression,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 291–299, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  69. T. Kojima, T. Norose, K. Tsuchiya, and K. Sakamoto, “Mouse 3T3-L1 cells acquire resistance against oxidative stress as the adipocytes differentiate via the transcription factor FoxO,” Apoptosis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. H.-Y. Lee, H.-J. You, J.-Y. Won et al., “Forkhead factor, FOXO3a, induces apoptosis of endothelial cells through activation of matrix metalloproteinases,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 302–308, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. P. F. Dijkers, R. H. Medema, J.-W. J. Lammers, L. Koenderman, and P. J. Coffer, “Expression of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bim is regulated by the forkhead transcription factor FKHR-L1,” Current Biology, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 1201–1204, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. Potente, B. Fisslthaler, R. Busse, and I. Fleming, “11,12-Epoxyeicosatrienoic acid-induced inhibition of FOXO factors promotes endothelial proliferation by down-regulating p27Kip1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 32, pp. 29619–29625, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. H.-S. Kim, C. Skurk, H. Maatz et al., “Akt/FOXO3a signaling modulates the endothelial stress response through regulation of heat shock protein 70 expression,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1042–1044, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. L. M. Ellerby, H. M. Ellerby, S. M. Park et al., “Shift of the cellular oxidation-reduction potential in neural cells expressing Bcl-2,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1259–1267, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  75. D. W. Voehringer and R. E. Meyn, “Redox aspects of Bcl-2 function,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 537–550, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. A. Hochman, H. Sternin, S. Gorodin et al., “Enhanced oxidative stress and altered antioxidants in brains of Bcl-2- deficient mice,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 741–748, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Juhyun Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views6715
Downloads845
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.