Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Oxidative Stress in Disease and Aging: Mechanisms and Therapies

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 732596 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/732596

Danielle R. Bruns, Joshua C. Drake, Laurie M. Biela, Frederick F. Peelor, Benjamin F. Miller, Karyn L. Hamilton, "Nrf2 Signaling and the Slowed Aging Phenotype: Evidence from Long-Lived Models", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 732596, 15 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/732596

Nrf2 Signaling and the Slowed Aging Phenotype: Evidence from Long-Lived Models

Academic Editor: Claudio Cabello-Verrugio
Received08 Apr 2015
Revised28 May 2015
Accepted04 Jun 2015
Published25 Oct 2015


Studying long-lived animals provides novel insight into shared characteristics of aging and represents a unique model to elucidate approaches to prevent chronic disease. Oxidant stress underlies many chronic diseases and resistance to stress is a potential mechanism governing slowed aging. The transcription factor nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 is the “master regulator” of cellular antioxidant defenses. Nrf2 is upregulated by some longevity promoting interventions and may play a role in regulating species longevity. However, Nrf2 expression and activity in long-lived models have not been well described. Here, we review evidence for altered Nrf2 signaling in a variety of slowed aging models that accomplish lifespan extension via pharmacological, nutritional, evolutionary, genetic, and presumably epigenetic means.

1. Introduction

The incidence of chronic disease increases with age. Understanding the relationships between the processes of aging and age-related diseases is an important initiative of the National Institutes of Health to improve the health of the aging population [1]. Slowing the aging process limits the burden of age-related chronic disease [2]. Identifying characteristics that slow aging may also provide approaches for preventing chronic diseases. Animals with increased lifespan aid in understanding the aging process by allowing the study of physiological and biochemical adaptations associated with slowed aging. Further, studying characteristics shared among long-lived models provides insight into pathways that are key to slowing the aging process and age-associated chronic diseases.

Lifespan can be extended by genetic, dietary, and pharmacological interventions. Additionally, multiple species have independently evolved long lifespan, including humans and naked mole rats, both of which live more than four times longer than predicted by body size [3]. Some of the earliest discoveries of lifespan extension were single-gene mutations associated with the insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) pathways. These mice, including the Snell dwarf [4], are smaller than their heterozygote counterparts and significantly longer-lived, some by 40% or more compared with controls. Long-term caloric restriction is the most consistent dietary manipulation to extend lifespan and recent evidence suggests that short-term transient nutrition restriction prior to weaning, accomplished by litter enlargement, also increases mean and maximal lifespan in mice [5]. Pharmaceutical manipulation of lifespan is in its infancy, with evidence that rapamycin can extend lifespan in mice [6].

It is well established that oxidant stress increases with age across a variety of tissues, including cardiac [7] and skeletal muscle [8], liver [9], and brain [10], and is associated with a wide variety of chronic age-related diseases including cancer, neurodegeneration, sarcopenia, and cardiovascular disease. Although the oxidative stress theory of aging has received criticism [11], it remains true that oxidant stress is associated with the aging process. In response to oxidative stress, cells upregulate antioxidant pathways, including activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2), the master regulator of antioxidant defenses and the proposed “master regulator” of the aging process [3]. Further, the therapeutic potential of Nrf2 is well supported in neurodegeneration and cancer (reviewed in [12, 13]), highlighting a role for Nrf2 in attenuating age-related chronic disease. Below, we will review what is known about Nrf2 in four models of lifespan extension: caloric restriction, rapamycin feeding, short-term nutrition restriction, and the Snell dwarf mouse. Further, we will discuss what is known about Nrf2 in the exceptionally long-lived naked mole rat and in humans who show enhanced longevity, with the overall goal of describing Nrf2 signaling in longevity interventions and in naturally occurring models of long life.

2. Nrf2 Signaling Basics

A member of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family, Nrf2, controls both basal and inducible expression of over 200 target genes. When cellular stress is low, Nrf2 is sequestered in the cytoplasm by its involvement in an inactive complex with the actin-binding protein Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1). Under these conditions, Keap1 targets Nrf2 for ubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome system, resulting in basal low-level expression of Nrf2 [14]. However, when activated, Nrf2 translocates to the nucleus and transcriptionally upregulates its cytoprotective transcriptional program through binding to the antioxidant response element (ARE) in the promoter region of its target genes. Activation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the best understood mechanism of Nrf2 activation. Oxidant exposure modifies cysteine residues on Keap1 resulting in conformational changes that protect Nrf2 from targeting for ubiquitination and degradation [15], thus resulting in Nrf2 accumulation and activation. In addition to ROS and electrophilic species, Nrf2 can also be activated by phytochemicals [1618], as well as various pharmaceuticals (reviewed in [19]) via overlapping and distinct mechanisms.

Nrf2 target genes exhibit antioxidant properties and facilitate cellular responses against xenobiotics. Antioxidant enzymes include NAD(P)H dehydrogenase quinone 1 (NQO1), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), peroxiredoxin 1 (Prdx1), superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD-1), and many enzymes involved in glutathione synthesis such as glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier (GCLM), the rate-limiting step in glutathione synthesis (reviewed in [20]). In addition, the cytoprotective properties of Nrf2 activation extend beyond these classic target genes, as other ARE-containing genes exhibit anti-inflammatory activity [21] and autophagic properties [22] and aid in proteasomal removal of oxidative damaged proteins [23]. Nrf2 also regulates its own expression. Two ARE-like motifs in the 5′flanking region of the Nrf2 promoter are responsible for the induction of Nrf2 upon activation [24], ensuring a feed-forward process with Nrf2 activation promoting its own expression and thus facilitating a profound cellular response to stress.

Studies of Nrf2 knockout animals highlight the importance of Nrf2 in cytoprotection. These animals display a diminished ability to activate prosurvival genes [30] and are more susceptible to a wide range of stressors including hyperoxia, lipopolysaccharide, cigarette smoke, and UV irradiation, as well as various chemical insults [31]. Nrf2 knockout animals display diminished basal activity of Nrf2-regulated antioxidant enzymes [30], as well as inducible targets. In a transcriptional analysis of Nrf2 target genes, treatment with the Nrf2 activator 3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione (D3T) induced 292 genes in wild type animals, compared to only 15 in Nrf2 knockout mice [32]. Together, investigations of Nrf2 knockout animals demonstrate diminished basal and inducible gene programs, as well as increased sensitivity to cell stresses, and support Nrf2 as an important transcriptional regulator of the cytoprotective program.

3. Nrf2 and Aging

The role of Nrf2 in responding to cytotoxic stressors is well defined. However, only within the last few years have studies elucidated how Nrf2 function changes with age and how changes in Nrf2 activity contribute to the aging phenotype. Aging is sufficient to diminish cardiac Nrf2-ARE binding activity [7], and aged Nrf2 knockout mice exhibit decreased expression of antioxidant target genes [8]. Disruptions in Nrf2-Keap1 signaling have been reported in skeletal muscle from sedentary older humans [33] and cardiac muscle from aging rats [7]. Impaired liver Nrf2 transcriptional activity in old rats results in glutathione depletion and significant downregulation of Nrf2-regulated glutathione biosynthetic enzymes [34]. Aged mice show similar losses in cellular redox capacity to those observed in Nrf2 knockout mice [34, 35], suggesting that Nrf2 dysregulation with age may be responsible for the loss of cellular redox status. Diminished Nrf2 target gene expression with age is accompanied by increased muscle ROS production, glutathione depletion, and increased oxidant damage to proteins, DNA, and lipids in both humans [33] and rodents [34]. Therefore, given that Nrf2 activity decreases with age alongside increased oxidant stress, interventions that activate Nrf2 may impact the aging process and longevity.

Support for the role of Nrf2 in regulation of lifespan comes from Nrf2 gain of function and loss of function studies. For example, experimental deletion of the antielectrophilic gene glutathione transferase (gGsta4) activated Nrf2 and significantly extended lifespan in mice [36]. This mutation increased electrophilic lipid peroxidation products and increased nuclear Nrf2 activity by 43% and 38% in liver and skeletal muscle, respectively. The authors propose that deletion of this glutathione transferase gene resulted in chronic moderate Nrf2 activation and presumably elevated downstream Nrf2 signaling throughout the mouse lifespan. Studies of the Nrf2 homolog SKN-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) and the Drosophila homolog CncC further suggest that Nrf2 may be implicated in longevity processes. Upon activation, SKN-1 and CncC upregulate genes involved in the oxidative stress response, including many orthologs to those regulated by mammalian Nrf2 [37, 38]. Similar to mouse Nrf2 knockouts, SKN-1 mutants show diminished resistance to oxidative stress and shortened lifespan. On the other hand, moderate overexpression of a constitutively active SKN-1 increases lifespan, alongside increased resistance to oxidative stress [37]. Similarly, Keap1 loss-of-function mutations extend the lifespan of male Drosophila [38]. Various lifespan extending genetic manipulations in C. elegans require SKN-1. Dietary restriction activates SKN-1, and expression of the transcription factor in C. elegans neuronal cells is required for longevity to be extended by dietary restriction [39]. The long-lived daf-2 (nematode homologue of FOXO) mutant increases lifespan in part through resultant activation of SKN-1 [40]. Together, what is known about Nrf2 and aging, alongside preliminary studies of the role of Nrf2 and SKN-1 in cytoprotection, suggests that loss of Nrf2 is important in age-associated declines in oxidant stress resistance, and perhaps in the aging pathology itself.

4. Nrf2 in Long-Lived Models

4.1. Naked Mole Rat

The naked mole rat is an exceptionally long-lived species, with a lifespan four times longer than similarly sized rodents, thus making the naked mole rat an important model for longevity studies [41]. Naked mole rats do not have typical lifespan curves in which mortality rates increase with age, but rather they experience few of the biological changes typically associated with aging such as decreased metabolic rate, body composition changes, and declines in genomic and proteomic integrity [42]. Naked mole rats are resistant to age-associated diseases such as cancer [43], cardiac diastolic dysfunction [44], and neurodegenerative diseases [45]. Thus, the naked mole rat represents a naturally occurring, unique model of healthy aging.

Surprisingly, early studies of naked mole rats revealed that they have higher levels of oxidative damage, including lipid peroxidation products, protein carbonyls, and oxidative DNA modification in the liver, compared to shorter-lived mouse controls [46]. Subsequent comparisons of young and old naked mole rats revealed a striking difference between age-associated changes in oxidative stress markers [47]. While macromolecular oxidant damage increases with age in mice, as it does in humans, naked mole rats maintain high levels of oxidative damage throughout their lifespan, similar to those observed in old mice [47]. In fact, few genes show differential expression between young and old animals, as assessed by transcriptome analyses in the brain, liver, and kidney from 4- and 20-month-old naked mole rats [26]. Therefore, while naked mole rats from a young age contain higher levels of oxidative damage than shorter-lived control mice, the typical age-associated increase in damage is blunted in this species, suggesting maintenance of oxidant stress defenses over time.

Naked mole rats also have significantly elevated proteasome quality control mechanisms [25]. The high breakdown and clearance of damaged proteins is suspected to be largely due to increased Nrf2 expression, as Nrf2 regulates the transcription of α and β subunits of the 26S proteasome, as well as the selective autophagy cargo protein p62 [4850]. In support of the hypothesized role of Nrf2 in naked mole rat longevity, under nonstressed conditions, naked mole rats have greater protein levels of Nrf2 including nuclear Nrf2, elevated Nrf2-ARE binding activity, and greater expression of Nrf2-regulated enzymes in fibroblasts and liver [51, 52]. These data suggest Nrf2 may be responsible for the heightened quality control mechanisms in naked mole rats and may be associated with their exceptional longevity.

4.2. Caloric Restriction

Caloric restriction (CR), a decrease in caloric intake without malnutrition, is the most consistent and robust means to increase lifespan across species, from flies to rodents [53], as well as nonhuman primate models [54]. Additionally, CR imparts slowed aging effects and delays the incidence of age-related disease [55]. Although the mechanisms underlying the effects of CR on longevity remain largely unknown, protection against carcinogenesis [56], reduced insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling [57], and prolonged survival [53] are documented. In addition, CR improves cellular adaptation to stress [58], as evidenced by liver mitochondria isolated from CR rats which show delayed opening of the mitochondrial transition pore upon oxidative challenge [58]. In an elegant study using sera collected from humans practicing long-term CR compared to sera collected from age- and sex-matched individuals following a typical western diet, treatment of cultured human primary fibroblasts with CR sera significantly upregulated gene expression of stress-response genes and enhanced tolerance to oxidants [59]. CR decreases ROS production, enhances the plasma membrane redox system, improves insulin signaling, and attenuates inflammation [27], all of which have been associated with improved age-related disease outcomes.

Many of the positive outcomes of CR have been associated with Nrf2 activation. For example, a variety of carcinogens activate Nrf2 and the ARE, protecting against carcinogenesis [60]. Changes in insulin levels, such as those elicited by fasting, elicit a small acute oxidant stress and subsequent activation of Nrf2 and its targets [61]. CR prevents the age-induced loss of cellular antioxidant capacity, in part due to increased levels of Nrf2 targets NQO1 and GSTs in brain and liver [62, 63]. In cerebral vascular endothelial cells, CR prevents the age-related decline in Nrf2 activity. Further, CR upregulates Nrf2 expression in old mice to a level that surpasses that of young ad libitum (AL) fed animals [64], highlighting the importance of Nrf2 with aging and its potential activation by longevity promoting interventions. Several proposed CR mimetics, such as resveratrol, quercetin, and curcumin [65], act to increase lifespan and slow aging at least in part through activation of Nrf2 [28, 6668]. We assessed Nrf2 signaling in cardiac muscle from 7-month-old animals that underwent lifelong 40% reduction in caloric intake compared to mice fed AL. We found Nrf2 protein expression to be unchanged by CR. However, NQO1 and SOD-1 were significantly upregulated (Figure 1) in CR, suggesting that a lifelong reduction in caloric intake may activate Nrf2 and be implicated in longevity in these animals.

Despite the positive associations between CR and Nrf2, the seminal study of Nrf2 and CR-induced lifespan extension is conflicting [69]. At 20 weeks of age, male and female Nrf2 knockout and wild type mice initiated a 40% reduction in caloric intake. As anticipated, the wild type mice were significantly protected against carcinogenesis on the CR diet compared to Nrf2 KO animals. However, survival curves showed that the CR and AL Nrf2 knockout mice overlapped until week 80, when they began to deviate for the remainder of the lifespan study, with CR Nrf2 knockout mice significantly outliving AL Nrf2 knockout mice. Therefore, while CR protected against carcinogenesis in a manner that was dependent on Nrf2, genetic ablation of Nrf2 did not attenuate lifespan extension by CR. This study suggests that lifespan extension in mice by CR is not entirely dependent on upregulation of the Nrf2 pathway, despite its promising role as a chemoprevention target. However, this conclusion is not without criticism, and a role of the antioxidant response in CR-mediated longevity cannot be completely ruled out [29]. Future investigations into whether or not other age-related diseases are slowed or reversed by Nrf2 activation and whether the attenuation of these diseases by CR requires Nrf2 are warranted.

4.3. Rapamycin

Rapamycin, a well-defined inhibitor of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), interacts with the Nrf2 signaling pathway, and Nrf2 may be implicated in rapamycin-mediated longevity. Exposure of adult C. elegans to rapamycin activates SKN-1 and downstream gene targets and significantly increases oxidative stress resistance in SKN-1 dependent manner [70]. Further, rapamycin treatment increased nematode lifespan through SKN-1, as evidenced by an abolished effect of rapamycin-mediated lifespan extension when SKN-1 was silenced by RNA interference [70]. Treatment with rapamycin also extends lifespan [71, 72] and slows the aging phenotype in mice, including decreased liver degeneration, attenuated cataract severity, and blunting of the age-associated decline in physical activity [73]. In vitro, chronic treatment with rapamycin significantly upregulates Nrf2 protein and transcript expression Nrf2 in fibroblasts, protects cultures from exogenous ROS exposure, and increases replicative lifespan of fibroblasts in culture [74]. We recently assessed skeletal muscle Nrf2 expression, as well as the expression of Nrf2 target proteins NQO1, HO-1, Prdx1, and SOD-1 in mice treated with rapamycin for 12 weeks. We were surprised to find no differences in Nrf2 and Nrf2 target protein expression between the long-lived rapamycin fed mice and controls. Prdx1 expression in skeletal muscle was significantly lower than control, but no other differences were observed in Nrf2 target protein expression between long-lived and control animals (Figure 2). Interestingly, we further assessed sex differences and found NQO1, Nrf2, and SOD-1 to be significantly greater in skeletal muscle from male mice compared to females (Figure 2). Given the disparate lifespan between males and females, and dissimilar effects of longevity interventions on male versus female mice, it is important to understand sex-specific signaling of the Nrf2 cytoprotective pathway, as elucidation of Nrf2 signaling in long-lived males and females may provide insight into the mechanisms behind sexual dimorphic longevity.

4.4. Snell Dwarf Mice

Snell dwarf mice are homozygous for a single-gene mutation at the Pit1 locus. This mutation results in an underdeveloped anterior pituitary and decreases in growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling. These mice display a 40% increase in mean and maximal longevity in both male and female mice compared to mice on similar backgrounds [4] and show delay in many age-related pathologies including attenuation of age-dependent collagen cross-linking and age-sensitive indices of immune system status [4]. This single gene mutation thus controls both maximal lifespan and the timing of senescence and age-related pathology, supporting the role of the IGF-1 and GH pathways in regulating mammalian longevity.

Snell mice display heightened Nrf2 signaling, as evidenced by increased skin-derived fibroblast expression of total cell Nrf2 protein compared to controls, in addition to upregulated expression of Nrf2 targets HO-1, thioredoxin, and GCLM [75]. In addition, Snell-derived fibroblasts show enhanced resistance to various forms of cytotoxic stress, like paraquat, peroxide, cadmium, and others that kill cells in part via ROS [76]. We recently assessed Nrf2 and targets in skeletal and cardiac muscle from 7-month-old Snell mice and found no differences in Nrf2 and target protein expression compared to control mice (Figure 3) in either males or females. Part of the discordance in Nrf2 signaling in primary fibroblasts compared to skeletal and cardiac muscle may be due to tissue-specific differences. Previous work suggests that Nrf2 activators induce the Nrf2 transcriptional program in some cell types, but not others [19, 77], demonstrating that cell and tissue types respond quite differently to Nrf2 activators. Varying metabolic demands between tissues may be responsible for tissue-specific Nrf2 activity [77], or inherent properties of the tissue, such as expression of Nrf2 activators/inhibitors. An assessment of tissue-specific differences in cellular stress responses is lacking and may play an important role in determining the response of Nrf2 to different longevity interventions.

4.5. Crowded Litter

Recent evidence shows that very-short-term nutrient restriction limited only to the preweaning phase by litter crowding extends lifespan by 16% in female mice and 7% in males [5]. In this model termed crowded litter (CL), increasing litter size from eight pups per mother to 12 imposes a transient energy restriction thought to represent an epigenetic means of improving lifespan [78], as the energy stress imposed only in the first three weeks of life extends lifespan and healthspan [79]. At weaning and through adult life, CL mice are leaner and consume more oxygen relative to body mass compared to control mice and have improved lifelong alterations in metabolic status [79]. CL mice have less body fat, lower leptin levels, and higher glucose tolerance and are more insulin sensitive than control mice [79]. Despite few studies interrogating mechanisms by which CL intervention imparts improved healthspan and lifespan, it seems clear that long-lasting endocrine and metabolic effects result from the early-life nutrient restriction.

As studies of CL mice are in their infancy, minimal data thus far directly link Nrf2 and CL. However, investigations of xenobiotic metabolism and resistance to cytotoxic insult suggest that CL mice maintain elevated levels of xenobiotic phase I metabolizing enzymes in the liver, alongside heightened resistance against tert-butylhydroquinone [78], an oxidant known to activate Nrf2 [80]. Based on these data showing enhanced stress resistance in CL, we assessed Nrf2 and targets in skeletal muscle from 3-4-month-old CL mice. In this young cohort, we failed to find differences in Nrf2 targets between CL and control (Figure 4) in either male or female mice. As metabolic and hormonal status change throughout development in the CL mice, corresponding alterations in Nrf2 activation may occur. Given the early stages of this longevity intervention, few investigations have been conducted into developmental changes in CL mice and how metabolism and Nrf2 may interface to regulate longevity in this model. Future investigations are warranted to more completely assess whether Nrf2 mediates lifespan extension and what role Nrf2 may play throughout the lifespan of CL mice.

4.6. Humans

Humans are amongst the longest-lived mammals, with a maximum species lifespan potential (MLSP) of over 100 years and a predicted lifespan four times longer than estimated by body mass [42]. Exceptionally long-lived humans, centenarians, may have constitutively upregulated Nrf2, allowing them to better respond to cell stresses and minimize cell damage with age [81]. Investigations of centenarians who seem to reside in areas with high nutrient density and low caloric density diets support this hypothesis, as these diets may be characterized as a prolonged mild form of CR. Physical activity is one of the most effective interventions to prevent chronic disease and delay the detrimental cellular changes with age (reviewed in [82]). Acute exercise stress activates Nrf2 [83] and is associated with enhanced antioxidant capacity. Therefore, it is plausible that exercise, a longevity-promoting intervention in humans, may promote healthspan in part through activation of Nrf2. Nrf2 activators are currently undergoing phase II clinical trials for treatment of various human chronic diseases. Bardoxolone methyl therapy, a therapeutic pulmonary hypertension intervention [84], and dimethyl fumarate (BG-12), a currently approved therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, promote cytoprotective properties, in part through activation of Nrf2 [85]. A sulforaphane-based pharmaceutical is slated to begin trials for prostate cancer [86] following preliminary studies showing diminished Nrf2 signaling in prostate cancer that is restored by sulforaphane treatment [87]. Thus it appears that some of the human diseases associated with aging may be treated with Nrf2 activators. However, whether Nrf2 expression is higher in long-lived centenarians remains unknown. Further, whether Nrf2 activation can increase human lifespan or delay human aging is still unexplored.

4.7. Nrf2 Activity and Maximal Lifespan Potential

The simultaneous study of species with varying MLSP facilitates the identification of associations between species longevity and specific mediators of lifespan, such as Nrf2. A comparison of eight rodent species with widely divergent longevities ranging from 4 to 31 years yielded a positive association between Nrf2-ARE binding activity and MLSP [52]. Quantitatively, for a 10-year increase in lifespan, Nrf2 activity increased 1.4-fold. Surprisingly, the authors of this study found that Nrf2 protein levels did not correlate with MLSP. Rather, mechanisms that control Nrf2 activity, such as Keap1 expression, significantly correlated with MLSP. Therefore, the authors posited that long-lived species are poised to effectively respond to cellular stresses associated with age and chronic disease due to the natural variation in Nrf2 activity. Together, these data support the notion that Nrf2 may be the “guardian of healthspan and the gatekeeper of species longevity” [3] and suggest that future investigations should elucidate whether activation of Nrf2 facilitates increases in healthspan and lifespan.

5. Mechanisms of Nrf2 Activation: Basal versus Inducible Activity

Our results of Nrf2 in long-lived mice presented here were obtained from young (3-4 and 7 months of age) mice that were not exposed to acute or chronic stresses. Young, unstressed animals generally do not display elevated Nrf2 signaling, as supported by investigations of young Nrf2 knockout mice, which do not have evidence of redox imbalance as assessed by either expression of Nrf2 target genes, overall cellular antioxidant status, or overt macromolecule oxidant damage [83]. However, when these Nrf2 knockout mice undergo an acute stress or when mice age, the ability to respond to and recover from the stress is attenuated. Thus, we suggest that the young mice in the long-lived cohorts reviewed here did not display enhanced Nrf2 signaling because there was no stressful stimulus from which to necessitate enhanced Nrf2 activation. Further, we assessed Nrf2 protein expression, as well as downstream Nrf2 target expression. Previous correlations between Nrf2 protein expression and MSLP, however, show no association between these two measurements [52]. Instead, Nrf2 activity, as assessed by Nrf2-ARE binding activity, along with proteins that influence Nrf2 activity, such as Keap1 expression [38], predicted MLSP. Therefore, we suggest that future investigations of Nrf2-mediated longevity should assess Nrf2 activity and the key proteins that regulate Nrf2 activation and nuclear localization. Further, we propose that these investigations be conducted in aged animals or younger animals administered a stressful stimulus. It is under these conditions that differences in Nrf2 signaling between long-lived and control animals should be most apparent.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

Chronic disease incidence increases with age. Slowing the aging process limits the burden of chronic disease [2]. The transcription factor Nrf2, a proposed “master regulator of the aging process,” regulates a wide battery of cytoprotective responses and helps attenuate age-related disease, and its activity is positively associated with species lifespan potential. Previous work of Nrf2 in long-lived models shows promise for slowed aging interventions (summarized in Table 1), with naked mole rats, an exceptionally long-lived species, showing enhanced Nrf2 signaling compared to shorter-lived mouse species. Caloric restriction and many of its pharmaceutical mimetics activate Nrf2 and protect against age-associated carcinogenesis, despite contradicting evidence showing no effect of Nrf2 expression in CR-induced longevity. Studies of rapamycin treated, Snell dwarf, and CL mice suggest that primary cells from these animals are more resistant to cytotoxic stress, which may be linked to elevated Nrf2 signaling. Future investigations should identify whether aged animals from long-lived cohorts have enhanced Nrf2 signaling that may explain their stress resistance. We hypothesize that pharmaceutical, genetic, epigenetic, and dietary manipulations that extend lifespan will enhance Nrf2 activation at advanced ages and under stressful cellular conditions, contributing to stress resistance and extended healthspan. Further, future investigations of Nrf2 signaling in humans, and the ability of Nrf2 activation to prevent chronic disease associated with aging, will lend further insight into the role of Nrf2 activation as a possible longevity-promoting intervention.

ModelTissue/cell typeNrf2 expressionNrf2 target expression
(NQOl, HO-1, SOD-1, etc.)
Nrf2 activity
(Nrf2-ARE binding)

Naked mole ratLiver[25]

Caloric restrictionHeartN.R.This manuscript

RapamycinSkMN.R.This manuscript
C. elegans [28]

SnellSkMN.R.This manuscript
HeartN.R.This manuscript

Crowded litterSkMN.R.This manuscript


Arrows indicate difference in the long-lived model compared to corresponding control, with ↑ indicating “greater in the long-lived model compared to control,” indicating “no difference between long-lived model and control,” and N.R. indicating “data were not reported in the investigation.” To date, no experimental data for Nrf2 expression or activity have been reported in aged humans. CMVEC: cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells; SkM: skeletal muscle (mixed skeletal muscle: gastrocnemius, soleus, and plantaris).


Nrf2:NFE2L2, nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2
SOD-1:Superoxide dismutase-1
NQO1:NAD(P)H hydroquinone oxidoreductase-1
HO-1:Heme oxygenase-1
Prdx1:Peroxiredoxin 1
CL:Crowded litter
CR:Caloric restriction
MLSP:Maximum species lifespan potential.


Benjamin F. Miller and Karyn L. Hamilton are co-principal investigators.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. J. B. Burch, A. D. Augustine, L. A. Frieden et al., “Advances in geroscience: impact on healthspan and chronic disease,” The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 69, supplement 1, pp. S1–S3, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Galioto, L. J. Dominguez, A. Pineo et al., “Cardiovascular risk factors in centenarians,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. N. Lewis, J. Mele, J. D. Hayes, and R. Buffenstein, “Nrf2, a guardian of healthspan and gatekeeper of species longevity,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 829–843, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Flurkey, J. Papaconstantinou, R. A. Miller, and D. E. Harrison, “Lifespan extension and delayed immune and collagen aging in mutant mice with defects in growth hormone production,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 6736–6741, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. Sun, A. A. S. Akha, R. A. Miller, and J. M. Harper, “Life-span extension in mice by preweaning food restriction and by methionine restriction in middle age,” Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 711–722, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. E. Harrison, R. Strong, Z. D. Sharp et al., “Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7253, pp. 392–395, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. S. Gounder, S. Kannan, D. Devadoss et al., “Impaired transcriptional activity of Nrf2 in age-related myocardial oxidative stress is reversible by moderate exercise training,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e45697, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. J. Miller, S. S. Gounder, S. Kannan et al., “Disruption of Nrf2/ARE signaling impairs antioxidant mechanisms and promotes cell degradation pathways in aged skeletal muscle,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1822, no. 6, pp. 1038–1050, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Sanz, C. Díez-Fernández, A. Alvarez, and M. Cascales, “Age-dependent modifications in rat hepatocyte antioxidant defense systems,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 525–534, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Benzi, O. Pastoris, F. Marzatico, and R. F. Villa, “Age-related effect induced by oxidative stress on the cerebral glutathione system,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 473–481, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. I. Liochev, “Reflections on the theories of aging, of oxidative stress, and of science in general. is it time to abandon the free radical (oxidative stress) theory of aging?” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Calkins, D. A. Johnson, J. A. Townsend et al., “The Nrf2/ARE pathway as a potential therapeutic target in neurodegenerative disease,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 497–508, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. L. L. Saw and A.-N. T. Kong, “Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 as a chemopreventive target in colorectal cancer,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 281–295, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Itoh, N. Wakabayashi, Y. Katoh et al., “Keap1 represses nuclear activation of antioxidant responsive elements by Nrf2 through binding to the amino-terminal Neh2 domain,” Genes and Development, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 76–86, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. I. Tong, A. Kobayashi, F. Katsuoka, and M. Yamamoto, “Two-site substrate recognition model for the Keap1-Nrf2 system: a hinge and latch mechanism,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 10-11, pp. 1311–1320, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y.-J. Surh, J. K. Kundu, and H.-K. Na, “Nrf2 as a master redox switch in turning on the cellular signaling involved in the induction of cytoprotective genes by some chemopreventive phytochemicals,” Planta Medica, vol. 74, no. 13, pp. 1526–1539, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. L. Donovan, J. M. McCord, D. J. Reuland, B. F. Miller, and K. L. Hamilton, “Phytochemical activation of Nrf2 protects human coronary artery endothelial cells against an oxidative challenge,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2012, Article ID 132931, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. J. Reuland, S. Khademi, C. J. Castle et al., “Upregulation of phase II enzymes through phytochemical activation of Nrf2 protects cardiomyocytes against oxidant stress,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 56, pp. 102–111, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. M. Hybertson, B. Gao, S. K. Bose, and J. M. McCord, “Oxidative stress in health and disease: the therapeutic potential of Nrf2 activation,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 32, no. 4–6, pp. 234–246, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Kobayashi and M. Yamamoto, “Nrf2-Keap1 regulation of cellular defense mechanisms against electrophiles and reactive oxygen species,” Advances in Enzyme Regulation, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 113–140, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Kim, Y.-N. Cha, and Y.-J. Surh, “A protective role of nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) in inflammatory disorders,” Mutation Research, vol. 690, no. 1-2, pp. 12–23, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Jain, T. Lamark, E. Sjøttem et al., “p62/SQSTM1 is a target gene for transcription factor NRF2 and creates a positive feedback loop by inducing antioxidant response element-driven gene transcription,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 29, pp. 22576–22591, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. M. Pickering, R. A. Linder, H. Zhang, H. J. Forman, and K. J. A. Davies, “Nrf2-dependent induction of proteasome and Pa28αβ regulator are required for adaptation to oxidative stress,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 13, pp. 10021–10031, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M.-K. Kwak, K. Itoh, M. Yamamoto, and T. W. Kensler, “Enhanced expression of the transcription factor Nrf2 by cancer chemopreventive agents: role of antioxidant response element-like sequences in the nrf2 promoter,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 2883–2892, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. V. I. Pérez, R. Buffenstein, V. Masamsetti et al., “Protein stability and resistance to oxidative stress are determinants of longevity in the longest-living rodent, the naked mole-rat,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 3059–3064, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. E. B. Kim, X. Fang, A. A. Fushan et al., “Genome sequencing reveals insights into physiology and longevity of the naked mole rat,” Nature, vol. 479, no. 7372, pp. 223–227, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Martín-Montalvo, J. M. Villalba, P. Navas, and R. de Cabo, “NRF2, cancer and calorie restriction,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 505–520, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T.-C. Hsieh, X. Lu, Z. Wang, and J. M. Wu, “Induction of quinone reductase NQO1 by resveratrol in human K562 cells involves the antioxidant response element ARE and is accompanied by nuclear translocation of transcription factor Nrf2,” Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 275–285, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. P. Sykiotis and D. Bohmann, “Stress-activated cap‘n’collar transcription factors in aging and human disease,” Science Signaling, vol. 3, no. 112, p. re3, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. Zhu, K. Itoh, M. Yamamoto, J. L. Zweier, and Y. Li, “Role of Nrf2 signaling in regulation of antioxidants and phase 2 enzymes in cardiac fibroblasts: protection against reactive oxygen and nitrogen species-induced cell injury,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 14, pp. 3029–3036, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. Motohashi and M. Yamamoto, “Nrf2-Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 549–557, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M.-K. Kwak, N. Wakabayashi, K. Itoh, H. Motohashi, M. Yamamoto, and T. W. Kensler, “Modulation of gene expression by cancer chemopreventive dithiolethiones through the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Identification of novel gene clusters for cell survival,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 10, pp. 8135–8145, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Safdar, J. deBeer, and M. A. Tarnopolsky, “Dysfunctional Nrf2-Keap1 redox signaling in skeletal muscle of the sedentary old,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1487–1493, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. H. Suh, S. V. Shenvi, B. M. Dixon et al., “Decline in transcriptional activity of Nrf2 causes age-related loss of glutathione synthesis, which is reversible with lipoic acid,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 3381–3386, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. T. W. Kensler, N. Wakabayashi, and S. Biswal, “Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 47, pp. 89–116, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. P. Singh, M. Niemczyk, D. Saini, V. Sadovov, L. Zimniak, and P. Zimniak, “Disruption of the mgsta4 gene increases life span of C57BL mice,” Journals of Gerontology—Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. H. An, K. Vranas, M. Lucke et al., “Regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans oxidative stress defense protein SKN-1 by glycogen synthase kinase-3,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 45, pp. 16275–16280, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. G. P. Sykiotis and D. Bohmann, “Keap1/Nrf2 signaling regulates oxidative stress tolerance and lifespan in Drosophila,” Developmental Cell, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 76–85, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Abdullah, N. R. Kitteringham, R. E. Jenkins et al., “Analysis of the role of Nrf2 in the expression of liver proteins in mice using two-dimensional gel-based proteomics,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 680–697, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. M. A. Tullet, M. Hertweck, J. H. An et al., “Direct inhibition of the longevity-promoting factor SKN-1 by insulin-like signaling in C. elegans,” Cell, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 1025–1038, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. Buffenstein, “Negligible senescence in the longest living rodent, the naked mole-rat: insights from a successfully aging species,” Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 439–445, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. N. Lewis, B. Andziak, T. Yang, and R. Buffenstein, “The naked mole-rat response to oxidative stress: just deal with it,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1388–1399, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Liang, J. Mele, Y. Wu, R. Buffenstein, and P. J. Hornsby, “Resistance to experimental tumorigenesis in cells of a long-lived mammal, the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber),” Aging Cell, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 626–635, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. M. Grimes, M. L. Lindsey, J. A. L. Gelfond, and R. Buffenstein, “Getting to the heart of the matter: age-related changes in diastolic heart function in the longest-lived rodent, the naked mole rat,” Journals of Gerontology—Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 384–394, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Y. H. Edrey, D. Casper, D. Huchon et al., “Sustained high levels of neuregulin-1 in the longest-lived rodents; a key determinant of rodent longevity,” Aging Cell, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 213–222, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. Andziak, T. P. O'Connor, W. Qi et al., “High oxidative damage levels in the longest-living rodent, the naked mole-rat,” Aging Cell, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 463–471, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. B. Andziak and R. Buffenstein, “Disparate patterns of age-related changes in lipid peroxidation in long-lived naked mole-rats and shorter-lived mice,” Aging Cell, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 525–532, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. G. Bjørkøy, T. Lamark, and T. Johansen, “p62/SQSTM1: a missing link between protein aggregates and the autophagy machinery,” Autophagy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 138–139, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. E. N. Tsakiri, G. P. Sykiotis, I. S. Papassideri, V. G. Gorgoulis, D. Bohmann, and I. P. Trougakos, “Differential regulation of proteasome functionality in reproductive vs. somatic tissues of Drosophila during aging or oxidative stress,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2407–2420, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. E. N. Tsakiri, G. P. Sykiotis, I. S. Papassideri et al., “Proteasome dysfunction in Drosophila signals to an Nrf2-dependent regulatory circuit aiming to restore proteostasis and prevent premature aging,” Aging Cell, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 802–813, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. N. Lewis, J. Mele, P. J. Hornsby, and R. Buffenstein, “Stress resistance in the naked mole-rat: the bare essentials—a mini-review,” Gerontology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 453–462, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. N. Lewis, E. Wason, Y. H. Edrey, D. M. Kristan, E. Nevoe, and R. Buffenstein, “Regulation of Nrf2 signaling and longevity in naturally long-lived rodents,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 12, pp. 3722–3727, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. Weindruch, R. L. Walford, S. Fligiel, and D. Guthrie, “The retardation of aging in mice by dietary restriction: longevity, cancer, immunity and lifetime energy intake,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 641–654, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  54. R. J. Colman, T. M. Beasley, J. W. Kemnitz, S. C. Johnson, R. Weindruch, and R. M. Anderson, “Caloric restriction reduces age-related and all-cause mortality in rhesus monkeys,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, article 3557, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. H. McKiernan, R. J. Colman, M. Lopez et al., “Caloric restriction delays aging-induced cellular phenotypes in rhesus monkey skeletal muscle,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. L. Gross and Y. Dreyfuss, “Reduction in the incidence of radiation-induced tumors in rats after restriction of food intake,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 23, pp. 7596–7598, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Bartke, M. Masternak, K. Al-Regaiey, and M. Bonkowski, “Effects of dietary restriction on the expression of insulin-signaling-related genes in long-lived mutant mice,” Interdisciplinary Topics in Gerontology, vol. 35, pp. 69–82, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. B. P. Yu and H. Y. Chung, “Stress resistance by caloric restriction for longevity,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 928, pp. 39–47, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  59. D. Omodei, D. Licastro, F. Salvatore, S. D. Crosby, and L. Fontana, “Serum from humans on long term calorie restriction enhances stress resistance in cell culture,” Aging, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 599–606, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  60. S. Kannan and A. K. Jaiswal, “Low and high dose UVB regulation of transcription factor NF-E2-related factor 2,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 17, pp. 8421–8429, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. K. Kim and R. F. Novak, “The role of intracellular signaling in insulin-mediated regulation of drug metabolizing enzyme gene and protein expression,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 88–120, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. B.-H. Hyun, S. S. Emerson, D.-G. Jo, M. P. Mattson, and R. De Cabo, “Calorie restriction up-regulates the plasma membrane redox system in brain cells and suppresses oxidative stress during aging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 52, pp. 19908–19912, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. L. H. Chen, N. Hu, and D. L. Snyder, “Effects of age and dietary restriction on liver glutathione transferase activities in Lobund-Wistar rats,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 191–205, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Csiszar, T. Gautam, D. Sosnowska et al., “Caloric restriction confers persistent anti-oxidative, pro-angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects and promotes anti-aging miRNA expression profile in cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells of aged rats,” American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 307, no. 3, pp. H292–H306, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. K. Ingram, M. Zhu, J. Mamczarz et al., “Calorie restriction mimetics: an emerging research field,” Aging Cell, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 97–108, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. C.-Y. Chen, J.-H. Jang, M.-H. Li, and Y.-J. Surh, “Resveratrol upregulates heme oxygenase-1 expression via activation of NF-E2-related factor 2 in PC12 cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 331, no. 4, pp. 993–1000, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. Tanigawa, M. Fujii, and D.-X. Hou, “Action of Nrf2 and Keap1 in ARE-mediated NQO1 expression by quercetin,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1690–1703, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. E. Balogun, M. Hoque, P. Gong et al., “Curcumin activates the haem oxygenase-1 gene via regulation of Nrf2 and the antioxidant-responsive element,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 371, no. 3, pp. 887–895, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. K. J. Pearson, K. N. Lewis, N. L. Price et al., “Nrf2 mediates cancer protection but not prolongevity induced by caloric restriction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 2325–2330, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. Robida-Stubbs, K. Glover-Cutter, D. W. Lamming et al., “TOR signaling and rapamycin influence longevity by regulating SKN-1/Nrf and DAF-16/FoxO,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 713–724, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. R. A. Miller, D. E. Harrison, C. M. Astle et al., “Rapamycin, but not resveratrol or simvastatin, extends life span of genetically heterogeneous mice,” The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 191–201, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  72. R. A. Miller, D. E. Harrison, C. M. Astle et al., “Rapamycin-mediated lifespan increase in mice is dose and sex dependent and metabolically distinct from dietary restriction,” Aging Cell, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 468–477, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. J. E. Wilkinson, L. Burmeister, S. V. Brooks et al., “Rapamycin slows aging in mice,” Aging Cell, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 675–682, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. C. Lerner, A. Bitto, D. Pulliam et al., “Reduced mammalian target of rapamycin activity facilitates mitochondrial retrograde signaling and increases life span in normal human fibroblasts,” Aging Cell, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 966–977, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. S. F. Leiser and R. A. Miller, “Nrf2 signaling, a mechanism for cellular stress resistance in long-lived mice,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 871–884, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. A. B. Salmon, S. Murakami, A. Bartke, J. Kopchick, K. Yasumura, and R. A. Miller, “Fibroblast cell lines from young adult mice of long-lived mutant strains are resistant to multiple forms of stress,” The American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. E23–E29, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. H. Wilms, J. Sievers, U. Rickert, M. Rostami-Yazdi, U. Mrowietz, and R. Lucius, “Dimethylfumarate inhibits microglial and astrocytic inflammation by suppressing the synthesis of nitric oxide, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 in an in-vitro model of brain inflammation,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 7, article 30, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. J. Steinbaugh, L. Y. Sun, A. Bartke, and R. A. Miller, “Activation of genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism is a shared signature of mouse models with extended lifespan,” The American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 303, no. 4, pp. E488–E495, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. M. Sadagurski, T. Landeryou, M. Blandino-Rosano et al., “Long-lived crowded-litter mice exhibit lasting effects on insulin sensitivity and energy homeostasis,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 306, no. 11, pp. E1305–E1314, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. Y.-C. Kim, Y. Yamaguchi, N. Kondo, H. Masutani, and J. Yodoi, “Thioredoxin-dependent redox regulation of the antioxidant responsive element (ARE) in electrophile response,” Oncogene, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1860–1865, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. Davinelli, D. C. Willcox, and G. Scapagnini, “Extending healthy ageing: nutrient sensitive pathway and centenarian population,” Immunity & Ageing, vol. 9, article 9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. E. M. Mercken, B. A. Carboneau, S. M. Krzysik-Walker, and R. de Cabo, “Of mice and men: the benefits of caloric restriction, exercise, and mimetics,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 390–398, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. V. R. Muthusamy, S. Kannan, K. Sadhaasivam et al., “Acute exercise stress activates Nrf2/ARE signaling and promotes antioxidant mechanisms in the myocardium,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 366–376, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Zhou, Y. Wang, H. Zhe, Y. Yang, and Z. He, “Bardoxolone methyl (CDDO-Me) as a therapeutic agent: an update on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 8, pp. 2075–2088, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. R. J. Fox, M. Kita, S. L. Cohan et al., “BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate): a review of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 251–262, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. B. Gao, A. Doan, and B. M. Hybertson, “The clinical potential of influencing Nrf2 signaling in degenerative and immunological disorders,” Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–34, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. C. Zhang, Z.-Y. Su, T. O. Khor, L. Shu, and A.-N. T. Kong, “Sulforaphane enhances Nrf2 expression in prostate cancer TRAMP C1 cells through epigenetic regulation,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 1398–1404, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Danielle R. Bruns et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.