Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2021 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.
Special Issue

Micro- and Nanostructures: Synthesis, Characterizations, and Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9912247 |

Igor Hernandes Gomes Marques, Robert Saraiva Matos, Yonny Romaguera-Barcelay, Ştefan Ţălu, Joaquim Agostinho Moreira, Abilio Almeida, Javier Perez de Cruz, Henrique Duarte da Fonseca Filho, "Investigation of Stereometric and Fractal Patterns of Spin-Coated LuMnO3 Thin Films", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2021, Article ID 9912247, 11 pages, 2021.

Investigation of Stereometric and Fractal Patterns of Spin-Coated LuMnO3 Thin Films

Academic Editor: Matjaz Valant
Received11 Mar 2021
Accepted21 May 2021
Published27 May 2021


In this paper, we have performed qualitative and quantitative analysis of LuMnO3 thin films surfaces, deposited by spin coating over Pt(111)/TiO2/SiO2/Si substrates, to evaluate their spatial patterns as a function of the film’s sintering temperature. Atomic force microscopy was employed to obtain topographic maps that were extensively analyzed via image processing techniques and mathematical tools. 3D (three-dimensional) topographical images revealed that films sintered at 650°C and 750°C presented the formation of smoother surfaces, while the film sintered at 850°C displayed a rougher surface with a root mean square roughness of ∼2.5 nm. On the other direction, the height distribution of the surface for all films has similar asymmetries and shape, although the film sintered using the highest temperature showed the lower density of rough peaks and a sharper peak shape. The advanced fractal parameters revealed that the film sintered at 850°C is dominated by low spatial frequencies, showing less spatial complexity, higher microtexture homogeneity, and uniform height distribution. These results suggest that the combination of stereometric and fractal parameters can be especially useful for identification of unique topographic spatial patterns in LuMnO3 thin films, helping in their implementation in technological applications, such as photovoltaic solar cells and information magnetic date storage and spintronic devices.

1. Introduction

Multiferroic oxide systems of the RMnO3 type (R = rare earth or transition metal ion) are materials that exhibit singular properties of ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity in a single phase, enabling wide applications in several areas. In this regard, they are considered as promising materials for photovoltaic applications to the information magnetic date storage industry, transducers, magnetic field sensors, many high-technology devices such as random-access memories, and spintronic devices because of their interesting magnetoelectric coupling property [14].

Some of the H-RMnO3 type rare earth (R) manganites with a perovskite structure are part of the multiferroic oxide system, and they have represented an important research area for solid-state and materials chemists and applied physicists for last decades, where “H” characterizes a hexagonal structure with space group P63cm [57]. The hexagonal structure with crystallographic group (P63cm) is built up of MnO5 trigonal bipyramids, and in the basal (ab) plane, the pyramids are linked at the base corners to construct a triangular lattice. The rare-earth ions are located between these MnO5 layers and they are linked with the oxygen atoms [8].

H-LuMnO3-type multiferroic oxides have been extensively investigated because they exhibit both magnetoelectric [911] and magnetoelastic effects [12]. Therefore, this system is an interesting material for application in ferroelectric photovoltaic devices [13]. Currently, a lot of research studies have been focused on the various forms of these materials, such as powders, nanostructures, bulk, and thin films [11, 1417]. The development of multiferroic thin film deposition technologies, which allows the deposition of strain formed structure, was an important step to tune the functionalities of material, providing an additional degree of freedom in new materials [3, 18].

Several experimental and theoretical studies about the structural and magnetic properties of LuMnO3 in the ferroelectric phase have been reported in the literature [10, 11, 19], although there are still some important questions that remain unanswered, for example, the origin of the grain size effects on the correlation between the magnetizations and structures. Furthermore, reports using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique for studies associated with the surface of thin LuMnO3 films are rare and somehow an important tool to evaluate physical properties of surfaces for technological application.

In recent years, morphological studies have been explored because AFM technique is strongly sensible and accurate. It is important to mention that multiferroic materials contribute to the development of new scientific methods [20]. In addition, topographical maps obtained by AFM allow us to access several parameters, such as stereometric [2123], fractal [2427], multifractal [2830], and power spectrum density (PSD) [23, 31, 32], which are very useful for characterization of surfaces at micro- or nanoscale. For this reason, exploring the nanoscale morphology of LuMnO3 thin films can provide reliable answers about the effect of sintering temperature on the formation of its topography. This can reveal how the spatial patterns of its surface, such as roughness, peak density, shape of peaks, texture quality, uniformity of height distribution, and heterogeneity of topographic texture distribution are affected when there is coalescence of grains on the surface.

Using a simple chemical method, we have synthesized LuMnO3 in films’ precursor solutions that were spin coated in Pt(111)/TiO2/SiO2/Si substrates. Our goal was evaluating the nanoscale patterns of the films using a combination of stereometric and advanced fractal parameters that, at the present moment, has not been reported yet. We have used several mathematical and analytical methods for obtaining the results. Specifically, we have explored the tools provided by MountainsMap commercial software to make an extensive image processing work. Moreover, we have used different algorithms for fractal parameters that are not provided by commercial software.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Samples’ Preparation

To produce a LuMnO3 precursor solution, lutetium (III) nitrate hydrate 99.99% pure (supplied by Aldrich), was previously dissolved, at 50°C, in glacial acetic acid (CH2CO2H) and nitric acid (HNO3), with a 2 : 1 molar ratio mixture, during 24 h. Afterwards, manganese (II) acetate tetrahydrate ((CH3COO)2 Mn•x4H2O), 99.99% pure (supplied by Merck), was added stoichiometrically to the lutetium precursor solution. The resulting solution was stabilized, with pure 2-methoxyethanol, in a solvent (2 : 1 : 6) molar ratio (CH2CO2H/HNO3/CH2OCH2CH2OH) during 24 hours, achieving a 0.2 molar concentration [33]. The LuMnO3 precursor solutions were deposited onto metallized Pt (111) (150 nm)/Ti (70 nm)/SiO2 (500 nm)/Si (1 mm) substrates supplied by the SVM company with a 144 cm2 area by using a Laurell WS-400-6NPP instrument. Thus, the solution dropped into the substrate was spin coated at 3000 rpm during 60 s and the resulting green layer was dried at 80°C in a hot plate for 1 min and presintering at 400°C in a tubular furnace for 10 minutes. This process was repeated 8 times to obtain presintering thin films with thicknesses of approximately 260 nm [11]. Afterwards, the presintering films were sintered at 650°C, 750°C, and 850°C during 1°h and labeled as LuMnO650, LuMnO750, and LuMnO850, respectively.

2.2. Analysis of the Samples

The films morphology was analyzed by using an atomic force microscope (Veeco Multimode NanoScope IVa) working on the tapping mode, with a scan rate of 1.0 Hz, scanning areas of 2.5 × 2.5 μm2, and resolution of 256 × 256 pixels. Images were collected in air, at room temperature (296 ± 1K) and 60 ± 1% relative humidity, using a silicon cantilever (model RTESP-300 from Bruker, with a 40 N/m spring constant). The complete analysis of the LuMnO3 thin films morphology was based on the evaluation of the stereometric parameters in accordance with the ISO 25178-2: 2012 standard. These parameters have their physical meaning well-described in [23, 3437] and in our analysis have been obtained by the MountainsMap® 8.0 commercial software [38]. In summary, we computed and evaluated several parameters, explicitly: height, feature, spatial, functional, hybrid, volume, and core Sk. Additionally, qualitative renderings, such as contour lines, furrows, and texture directions, obtained by Fourier transforms on the height function were computed for surface microtexture evaluation of the films.

Furthermore, we have determined advanced fractal parameters to study surface microtexture. Fractal dimension (FD) was computed using the counting box method described by Mandelbrot and Wheeler [39], while fractal lacunarity (FL) was computed using a model described by Salcedo et al. [40]. From the lacunarity curve, we estimated the lacunarity coefficient (β) using equation (1), for obtaining data about surface texture homogeneity [41]:where L(r) is lacunarity, is a constant, and r is the box size.

The average power spectrum density (PSD) of fractal regions of the spectra was calculated using linearized graphs obtained according to the mathematical theory explained by Jacobs et al. [42]. From the linearized graph, we have estimated the Hurst coefficients of all spectra using equation (2) according to Jacobs et al. [42], where γ is the slope of the linearized curve that was obtained using the WsxM© 5.0 software [43]:

Fractal succolarity (FS) was calculated using the model described by Melo and Conci [44], where, from equation (3), the calculated values were obtained for all thin films:where dir is the liquid entry direction, Po(T(k)) is the occupation percentage, T(k) are boxes of equal size T(n), PR is occupation pressure, and pc is centroid position (x, y).

Surface entropy (E) was obtained from the information theory description using Shannon Entropy equation [45] (equation (4)), where pij is assigned to be the probability that a height matrix term promotes a complete uniformity of height distribution:

The obtained value was centralized and normalized according to equation (5) to give us a normalized value of E [46]:where the factors and are calculated from Shannon entropy equation [45, 47] that is based on information theory and give us a normalized measure of E. FS and E were obtained using algorithms programmed in RStudio© Version 1.3.1093 software [48], while FL using FORTRAN 77 [41]. All advanced fractal parameters were computed from AFM topographical matrix extracted by WSXM software. The computational routines were programmed in R language (For FS and E) and Fortran 77 (for FL).

To compute experiments precision, we have used variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey test with a value of 0.05, for all thin films were taken four measures in random regions along the surface.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Nanoscale Morphology Analysis

The nanoscale morphology of LuMnO3 thin films sintered at 650, 750, and 850°C is shown in Figure 1. As can be seen, the two lowest sintering temperatures (LuMnO650 and LuMnO750) promoted the formation of smoother surfaces, while the highest temperature provided a rougher surface. In Figure 1(e), it is possible to observe the great contours on more mountainous regions, which refers to the grains’ contour as can be better observed in Figure S1 (supplementary material), which presents the images of Figure 1 in 2D. This behavior is due to the great reorganization of the crystal, which may be associated with the grain growth, discordance movement, and isotropy of the surface microtexture, which occurred due to the greater coalescence of the grains.

The morphology evaluated is similar to that found on other works previously published, where the effect of the sintering temperature was studied, and it was confirmed that only after 850°C there was the complete formation of pure polycrystalline phase of LuMnO3 [11]. This system is also assigned to have a hexagonal phase or single crystal structure, as reported by other authors in [19, 49]. In fact, the height parameters shown in Table 1 confirm our qualitative observation, as LuMnO850 presented the highest topographic roughness, which was computed for both average roughness (Sa) (∼1.8 nm) and the root mean square roughness (Sq) (∼2.5 nm). Additionally, the topographic pattern is similar for maximum peak height (Sp), maximum pit height (Sv), and maximum height (Sz), showing that there is a persistence of topographic patterns in LuMnO850 significantly different from LuMnO650 and LuMnO750.


Sq(nm)0.30 ± 0.030.61 ± 0.352.48 ± 0.53
Ssk(—)0.33 ± 0.150.39 ± 0.430.22 ± 0.08
Sku(—)3.60 ± 0.314.24 ± 1.373.17 ± 0.45
Sp(nm)1.38 ± 0.212.78 ± 1.868.23 ± 0.82
Sv(nm)1.18 ± 0.162.62 ± 0.959.09 ± 1.94
Sz(nm)2.56 ± 0.185.40 ± 2.8017.27 ± 2.32
Sa(nm)0.24 ± 0.020.45 ± 0.221.81 ± 0.43

denotes samples without significant difference, ANOVA One-Way and Tukey Test ().

The relative frequencies of the topographic heights shown in Figures 1(b), 1(d), and 1(f) reveal that the height distribution of the films surface has similar asymmetries and shape. In other words, although the distributions are not Gaussian, as Sku ≠ 3 and Ssk ≠ 0, all topographic patterns have an inclination to right (Ssk with + signal) and leptokurtic distribution (Sku > 3) (Table 1) [50, 51]. The S-shape red curve observed in all relative height histograms is Abbott-Firestone curve [52] that exposes a widely smooth line for all surfaces, as a result of the similar asymmetry and distribution shape for topographical heights. This indicates that, for recurrent depths, a progressive increase in the content of the material covered in relation to the evaluated area occurs, which was observed for all surfaces without statistically significant difference ().

3.2. Advanced Stereometric Evaluation

The relationship between topographic patterns and the microtexture of the films was evaluated using stereometric parameters [34] more specifically, as shown in Table 2. In this table, the functional parameters of the topographic patterns suggest that the LuMnO850 microtexture is strongly different from LuMnO650 and LuMnO750. Specifically, a greater inverse areal material ratio (Smc) is observed for LuMnO850, which is not observed in any other film. This behavior is also noted for peak extreme height (Sxp). Furthermore, the core thickness and volume parameters, whose definitions are shown in Figure S2 (supplementary material) [35], confirm that the roughness distribution is responsible for forming a microtexture with more intense patterns, as observed for LuMnO850. In this regard, LuMnO850 has the largest core roughness depth (Sk), reduced peak height (Spk), and reduced valley depth (Svk) (Table 2). In addition, the average value of peak material portion (Smr1) and valley material portion (Smr2) do not fluctuate (), showing that the percentage of material that represents the peak patterns related to Spk and Svk remains stable. Similarly, all volume parameters of core surface associated to peak or valley material show that LuMnO850 have more intense patterns. In fact, this is recorded by the dale void volume (Vvv), core void volume (Vvc), peak material volume (Vmp), and core material volume (Vmc) (Table 2). These results confirm the qualitative observation made in Figure 1(e)), suggesting that a greater thickness and volume of material are observed in the formed topography.


Smc(nm)0.39 ± 0.040.70 ± 0.323.04 ± 0.80
Sxp(nm)0.54 ± 0.051.10 ± 0.594.23 ± 0.57
Sk(nm)0.72 ± 0.071.23 ± 0.406.00 ± 1.69
Spk(nm)0.39 ± 0.050.98 ± 0.862.58 ± 0.20
Svk(nm)0.27 ± 0.040.60 ± 0.402.00 ± 0.30
Smr1(%)12.43 ± 0.8511.87 ± 2.1312.88 ± 0.68
Smr2(%)90.57 ± 0.8888.70 ± 3.5390.55 ± 2.62
Vmp(μm3/μm2)1.9e−05 ± 2.8e−065.1e−05 ± 4.8e−051.2e−04 ± 8.6e−06
Vmc(μm3/μm2)2.6e−04 ± 2.8e−054.7e−04 ± 2.0e−042.0e−03 ± 5.3e−04
Vvc(μm3/μm2)3.8e−04 ± 4.0e−056.8e−04 ± 3.2e−042.9e−03 ± 7.9e−04
Vvv(μm3/μm2)3.1e−05 ± 3.3e−066.8e−05 ± 4.3e−052.3e−04 ± 2.7e−05

Spd(1/μm2)122.04 ± 12.0453.56 ± 29.0510.73 ± 2.78
Spc(1/μm2)2.82 ± 0.083.73 ± 0.767.56 ± 0.16

Sdq(—)0.01 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.000.05 ± 0.01
Sdr(%)0.01 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.000.14 ± 2.78

denotes samples without significant difference, ANOVA One-Way and Tukey Test ().

The feature parameters reveal that LuMnO850 shows a lower density of rough peaks and a more pointed peak shape, as it presents lower peak density (Spd) (∼10 μm−2) and higher arithmetic mean peak curvature (Spc) (∼7.6 μm−2), respectively. In addition, the hybrid parameters indicate that LuMnO850 presents the least flat surface because the root mean square gradient (Sdq) (0.053) is greater than in any other films. This physical property is confirmed by the measure of developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr), where LuMnO850 shows the lowest average value (∼0.14%).

3.3. Microtexture Analysis

As an important qualitative observation tool available in MountainsMap and widely used for the evaluation of surface microtextures of thin films or other systems [25, 5357], the renderings of the surface microtexture shown in Figure 2 reveal contour lines and furrows belonging to each analyzed sample. As seen in Figure 2(e) (contour lines), the grain appears to have a rice-like shape, which can also be seen in Figure S1, while the smoother morphology of LuMnO650 and LuMnO750 reveal grain clusters’ minors who have not coalesced. Observing the color scales exhibited in the renderings of Figures 2(a), 2(c), and 2(e), it is possible to observe that LuMnO650 and LuMnO750 present less intense roughness distributions than LuMnO850, which confirms the observation carried out during the analysis of the 3D morphology images of the films (Figure 1). The furrows that surround the grains in LuMnO850 exhibit valleys with greater depths, which is confirmed by the quantitative parameter’s Maximum depth furrow (∼6 nm) and mean depth furrow (∼2 nm) (Table 3).


Maximum depth(nm)0.83 ± 0.071.34 ± 0.346.05 ± 0.11
Mean depth(nm)0.35 ± 0.020.55 ± 0.152.15 ± 0.19

TI(%)56.48 ± 9.3956.50 ± 12.5456.92 ± 5.68
Sal(μm)0.19 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.040.21 ± 0.03
Str(—)0.56 ± 0.090.56 ± 0.120.57 ± 0.06
First direction(°)128.39 ± 23.41135.00 ± 0.01107.26 ± 18.79
Second direction(°)134.99 ± 13.09105.88 ± 27.5083.89 ± 41.92
Third direction(°)96.62 ± 41.7176.77 ± 44.95121.50 ± 22.70

denotes samples without significant difference, ANOVA One-Way and Tukey Test ().

The specific texture parameters shown in Table 3 suggest that there is no difference in the surface texture of the analyzed films. In fact, texture isotropy (TI), autocorrelation length (Sal), texture-aspect ratio (Str), and all texture directions, explicitly, first, second, and third directions do not show statistically significant difference. Interestingly, the polar graph of Figure 3 shows that the texture distribution of the films has different shapes. Naturally, these stereometric parameters are obtained from Fourier transforms using always the same height distribution function [37]. As the topographic heights exhibited a similar behavior (leptokurtic) (Table 1), it is reasonable that these parameters do not fluctuate. Moreover, it is also observed that the topographic asymmetries are similar, as Ssk also do not fluctuate, as shown in Table 1, which shows that distributions’ profile has similar characteristics, although their roughness have different behaviors. For this reason, the characterization of different spatial patterns of the surface microtexture was made using fractal parameters that consider specific mathematical equations based on models recently described by other authors [25, 41].

3.4. Fractal Characterization

To understand better the effect of the sintering temperature on the formation of topographic spatial patterns of the films, we computed advanced fractal parameters. Figure 4 shows the lacunarity distribution and the power spectrum density (PSD) of the analyzed samples. Figures 4(a)4(c) show that the films exhibit a strong fractal pattern, as the lacunarity has persistently decreased when the box size has increased. Figures 4(d)4(f) reveal that the films present extensive self-affine behavior because power spectra found in the fractal region display well-adjusted fits (R2 > 0.95). The computed parameters reveal that spatial complexity of the films decrease from LuMnO650 to LuMnO850 because fractal dimension (FD) consistently decrease with the film sintering temperature (LuMnO650 > LuMnO750 > LuMnO850), showing that the surface microtexture changed when sintering temperature increases, as result of increasing in the topographic roughness.

This pattern affected the signal quality of the dominant spatial frequencies because LuMnO850 exhibited a higher Hurst coefficient (HC∼0.9), explicitly, being dominated by low spatial frequencies, while LuMnO650 registered a lower HC value (∼0.1) (Table) being dominated by high dominant spatial frequencies. The PSD is a very useful tool for differentiating surfaces on a micro- or manometric scale and that has been extensively used in the analysis of different films [23, 31, 32, 58]. Based on the PSD, we observed that high sintering temperatures form LuMnO3 surfaces with lower spatial frequencies. We attribute this fact to a more rugged height distribution, probably due to the increase in the particle size as effect of increasing the sintering temperature.

A major contribution of the effect of sintering temperature on the surface microtexture of the films is relative to their surface heterogeneity. The reorganization of the crystal for high sintering temperature promotes a most homogeneous microtexture, as LuMnO850 shows the lowest value of the lacunarity coefficient (β) (6.97e − 08) (Table 4), while the films sintered at lowest temperatures (650°C and 750°c) exhibit similar and more heterogeneous textures. This takes place because although these samples show smoother surfaces, the distribution of gaps along the surface does not show a coherent organization, which is not observed for LuMnO850. Despite this, all films show similar surface percolation since fractal succolarity (FS) does not show a statistically significant difference () (Table 4). This means that the surface porosity does not change when the sintering temperature increases, although the gaps are organized more evenly along the surface. Furthermore, all films also showed strong uniformity of height distribution because their surface entropy was similar (E∼1) [41], also without a statistically significant difference (). This particular result reveals that the microtextures have height distributions with almost no discontinuity points that can promote material failures [46]. Specifically, some physical properties, such as wear, adhesion, and microfriction, can be measured uniformly across the surface, as the height distribution is a real response of the cantilever vibration in function of the analyzed topography [59], which we naturally attribute to a uniform process of films’ deposition via the spin-coating method. Thus, it is observed that advanced fractal parameters reveal unique aspects of the films’ microtexture that could not be observed by traditional analysis.


FD(—)2.391 ± 0.0112.331 ± 0.0622.264 ± 0.020
HC(—)0.113 ± 0.0160.273 ± 0.0270.863 ± 0.013
ǀβǀ(—)5.33e−06 ± 3.34e−062.06e−06 ± 1.40e−066.97e−08 ± 4.84e−08
FS(—)0.522 ± 0.0020.512 ± 0.0130.510 ± 0.027
E(—)0.973 ± 0.0040.952 ± 0.0460.977 ± 0.014

denotes samples without significant difference, ANOVA One-Way and Tukey Test ().

4. Conclusion

The spatial patterns of LuMnO3 thin films were studied from topographic maps obtained by atomic force microscopy. The morphology of sintered films with lower temperatures was smoother, while the higher temperature promoted a rougher surface, which was confirmed by the topographic parameters of height. Advanced stereometric parameters revealed that the roughness distribution of films sintered at lower temperatures was uniquely different from the film sintered at 850°C, where the peak shape was more sharp and the distribution of roughness was less dense, which influenced the thickness and volume of material present in the core of the surfaces. Qualitative renderings of the material’s microtexture confirmed the observed morphological differences, although specific texture parameters computed by Fourier transforms on the height function have suggested that the microtextures of the films were assigned to be similar. Nevertheless, the spatial patterns proved to be different because the advanced fractal parameters revealed that the film sintered at 850°C presents less spatial complexity and that it is dominated by low dominant spatial frequencies. This higher sintering temperature coalesced the grains so that their microtexture became more homogeneous. Moreover, because of the uniform deposition process, the surface porosity and topographic uniformity of the films did not fluctuate when sintering temperature has increased. Therefore, our results showed that a combination of stereometric and fractal parameters can be especially useful for controlling the process of fabrication of thin films based on rare-earth-based perovskites oxides.

Data Availability

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors thank the Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM) for the infrastructure of the Analytical Center. Av. General Rodrigo Octavio Jordão Ramos, 1200-Coroado I, Manaus, Amazonas, 69067-005, Brazil.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Graphical study of volume parameters (left) and Sk parameters (right) based on the Abbott curve calculated for the samples: (a) LuMnO650, (b) LuMnO750, and (c) LuMnO850. Figure S2. 2D AFM topographic maps of (a) LuMnO650, (b) LuMnO750, and (c) LuMnO850. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. D. Lee, S. M. Yang, T. H. Kim et al., “Multilevel data storage memory using deterministic polarization control,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 402–406, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Rajendran, J. Qin, F. Gracia, and E. Lichtfouse, Metal and Metal Oxides for Energy and Electronics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2021. View at: Publisher Site
  3. S. S. Subramanian, S. Anandan, and B. Natesan, “Stabilization of E-type antiferromagnetic ordering in La and Y substituted orthorhombic LuMnO3: a first-principles study,” Physics Letters A, vol. 383, no. 32, Article ID 125950, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Tachibana, T. Shimoyama, H. Kawaji, T. Atake, and E. Takayama-Muromachi, “Jahn-Teller distortion and magnetic transitions in perovskite RMnO3(R=Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu),” Physical Review B, vol. 75, Article ID 144425, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Li, H. Tan, and W. Duan, “Hexagonal rare-earth manganites and ferrites: a review of improper ferroelectricity, magnetoelectric coupling, and unusual domain walls,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 22, no. 26, pp. 14415–14432, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Fontcuberta, “Multiferroic RMnO3 thin films,” Comptes Rendus Physique, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 204–226, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Sim, J. Jeong, H. Kim, S. W. Cheong, and J. G. Park, “Studies on the high-temperature ferroelectric transition of multiferroic hexagonal manganite RMnO3,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 30, no. 10, Article ID 105601, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Cano, “Hidden order in hexagonal RMnO3 multiferroics (R=Dy–Lu, In, Y, and Sc),” Physical Review B., vol. 89, Article ID 214107, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. B. Souchkov, J. R. Simpson, M. Quijada et al., “Exchange interaction effects on the optical properties of LuMnO3,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, Article ID 027203, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. G. Figueiras, D. Karpinsky, P. B. Tavares et al., “Novel multiferroic state and ME enhancement by breaking the AFM frustration in LuMn1−xO3,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1335–1341, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Romaguera-Barcelay, J. A. Moreira, A. Almeida, and J. P. de la Cruz, “Structural and electrical properties of LuMnO3 thin film prepared by chemical solution method,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 520, no. 6, pp. 1734–1739, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. Fu, H. S. Nair, Y. Xiao et al., “Magnetic structures and magnetoelastic coupling of Fe-doped hexagonal manganites LuMn1−xFexO3(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.3),” Physical Review B., vol. 94, Article ID 125150, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Han, S. Song, J. H. Lee et al., “Switchable photovoltaic effects in hexagonal manganite thin films having narrow band gaps,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 27, no. 21, pp. 7425–7432, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Lu, S. Dong, Z. Xia et al., “Polarization enhancement and ferroelectric switching enabled by interacting magnetic structures in DyMnO3 thin films,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, p. 3374, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. V. V. Roddatis, A. R. Akbashev, S. Lopatin, and A. R. Kaul, “Complex structural-ferroelectric domain walls in thin films of hexagonal orthoferrites RFeO3 (R=Lu, Er),” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 103, no. 11, Article ID 112907, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Lin, H. M. Zhang, M. F. Liu et al., “Hexagonal phase stabilization and magnetic orders of multiferroic Lu1−xScxFeO3,” Physical Review B, vol. 93, Article ID 075146, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. H. Jabarov, N. T. Dang, S. E. Kichanov et al., “Crystal structure and vibrational spectra of hexagonal manganites YMnO3 and LuMnO3 under high pressure,” Materials Research Express, vol. 6, Article ID 086110, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Zhang, A. Dönni, V. Y. Pomjakushin, K. Yamaura, and A. A. Belik, “Crystal and magnetic structures and properties of (Lu1−xMnx)MnO3 solid solutions,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 22, pp. 14073–14085, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Imamura, M. Karppinen, H. Fjellvåg, and H. Yamauchi, “Hole doping into the metastable LuMnO3 perovskite,” Solid State Communications, vol. 140, no. 7-8, pp. 386–390, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Sobola, S. Ramazanov, M. Konečný et al., “Complementary SEM-AFM of swelling Bi-Fe-O film on Hopg substrate,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 2402, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Ş. Ţălu, A. Achour, S. Solaymani et al., “Micromorphology analysis of TiO2 thin films by atomic force microscopy images: the influence of postannealing,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1–7, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. Fattahi, N. B. Nezafat, Ş. Ţălu et al., “Topographic characterization of zirconia-based ceramics by atomic force microscopy: a case study on different laser irradiations,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 831, Article ID 154763, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. R. Barcelay, J. A. G. Moreira, A. de Jesus Monteiro Almeida, W. R. Brito, R. S. Matos, and H. D. da Fonseca Filho, “Nanoscale stereometric evaluation of BiZn0.5Ti0.5O3 thin films grown by RF magnetron sputtering,” Materials Letters, vol. 279, Article ID 128477, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Ş. Ţălu, S. Stach, S. Valedbagi, S. M. Elahi, and R. Bavadi, “Surface morphology of titanium nitride thin films synthesized by DC reactive magnetron sputtering,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 33, pp. 137–143, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. M. de Oliveira, R. S. Matos, P. H. Campelo, E. A. Sanches, and H. D. da Fonseca Filho, “Evaluation of the nanoscale surface applied to biodegradable nanoparticles containing Allium sativum essential oil,” Materials and Letters, vol. 275, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Ş. Ţălu, M. Bramowicz, S. Kulesza, V. Dalouji, S. Solaymani, and S. Valedbagi, “Fractal features of carbon-nickel composite thin films,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 79, pp. 1208–1213, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. Sobola, Ş. Ţălu, S. Solaymani, and L. Grmela, “Influence of scanning rate on quality of AFM image: study of surface statistical metrics,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 1328–1336, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. P. Yadav, S. Dwivedi, A. K. Mittal, M. Kumar, and A. C. Pandey, “Fractal and multifractal analysis of LiF thin film surface,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 261, pp. 547–553, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. Shakoury, S. Rezaee, F. Mwema et al., “Multifractal and optical bandgap characterization of Ta2O5 thin films deposited by electron gun method,” Optical and Quantum Electronics, vol. 52, pp. 1–13, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Ş. Ţălu, S. Stach, S. Valedbagi, R. Bavadi, S. M. Elahi, and M. Ţălu, “Multifractal characteristics of titanium nitride thin films,” Materials Science-Poland, vol. 33, pp. 541–548, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Senthilkumar, N. K. Sahoo, S. Thakur, and R. B. Tokas, “Characterization of microroughness parameters in gadolinium oxide thin films: a study based on extended power spectral density analyses,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 252, no. 5, pp. 1608–1619, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Arman, Ş. Ţălu, C. Luna, A. Ahmadpourian, M. Naseri, and M. Molamohammadi, “Micromorphology characterization of copper thin films by AFM and fractal analysis,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 9630–9639, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Romaguera-Barcelay, J. A. Moreira, G. González-Aguilar, A. Almeida, J. P. Araujo, and J. Pérez de la Cruz, “Synthesis of orthorhombic rare-earth manganite thin films by a novel chemical solution route,” Journal of Electroceramics, vol. 26, no. 1–4, pp. 44–55, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. A. Franco and A. Sinatora, “3D surface parameters (ISO 25178-2): actual meaning of Spk and its relationship to Vmp,” Precision Engineering, vol. 40, pp. 106–111, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Blateyron, “The areal field parameters,” Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Blateyron, Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at: Publisher Site
  37. R. S. Matos, E. P. Pinto, G. Q. Ramos, M. D. Fonseca de Albuquerque, and H. D. Fonseca Filho, “Stereometric characterization of kefir microbial films associated with Maytenus rigida extract,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 1401–1410, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Digital Surf, Mountains®, 2020,
  39. B. B. Mandelbrot and J. A. Wheeler, “The fractal geometry of nature,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 286-287, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. O. C. Salcedo, R. R. M. Zamora, and J. C. T. Carvalho, “Study fractal leaf surface of the plant species Copaifera sp. using the microscope atomic-force-AFM,” Revista ECIPerú, vol. 13, pp. 10–16, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Ş. Ţălu, S. Abdolghaderi, E. P. Pinto, R. S. Matos, and M. Salerno, “Advanced fractal analysis of nanoscale topography of Ag/DLC composite synthesized by RF-PECVD,” Surface Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 713–719, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. D. B. Jacobs, T. Junge, and L. Pastewka, “Quantitative characterization of surface topography using spectral analysis,” Surface Topography Metrology Properties, vol. 5, Article ID 013001, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I. Horcas, R. Fernández, J. M. Gómez-Rodríguez, J. Colchero, J. Gómez-Herrero, and A. M. Baro, “WSXM: a software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, Article ID 013705, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. H. C. de Melo and A. Conci, “Succolarity: defining a method to calculate this fractal measure,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Systems Signals Image Processing, pp. 291–294, IEEE, Maribor, Slovenia, July 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Nosonovsky, “Entropy in tribology: in the search for applications,” Entropy, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1345–1390, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. S. Matos, G. A. C. Lopes, N. S. Ferreira et al., “Superficial characterization of kefir biofilms associated with açaí and cupuaçu extracts,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 3371–3379, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Bulinski and D. Dimitrov, “Statistical estimation of the Shannon entropy,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 17–46, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. S. Racine, “RStudio: a platform-independent ide for R and sweave,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 167–172, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. B. B. Van Aken, A. Meetsma, and T. T. M. Palstra, “Hexagonal LuMnO3 revisited,” Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online, vol. 57, pp. i101–i103, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. N. Yu and A. A. Polycarpou, “Contact of rough surfaces with asymmetric distribution of asperity heights,” Journal of Tribology, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 367–376, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. S. Matos, G. Q. Ramos, H. D. da Fonseca Filho, and Ş. Ţălu, “Advanced micromorphology study of microbial films grown on Kefir loaded with Açaí extract,” Micron, vol. 137, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. E. J. Abbott and F. A. Firestone, “Specifying surface quality,” Mechnical Engineering, vol. 55, pp. 569–572, 1933. View at: Google Scholar
  53. Y. Romaguera-Barcelay, A. S. Pedraca, J. A. Moreira et al., “Evaluation of nanostructured BiZn0.5Ti0.5O3 thin films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 267, Article ID 115090, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  54. R. S. Matos, B. S. Pinheiro, I. S. Souza et al., “3D micromorphology evaluation of kefir microbial films loaded with extract of Amazon rainforest fruit Cupuaçu,” Micron, vol. 142, Article ID 102996, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. A. Amâncio, E. P. Pinto, R. S. Matos, F. X. Nobre, W. R. Brito, and H. D. da Fonseca Filho, “Nanoscale morphology and fractal analysis of TiO2 coatings on ITO substrate by electrodeposition,” Journal of Microscopy, vol. 281, p. 12990, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  56. R. M. Ito, C. C. de Souza, A. M. D. Gandarilla et al., “Micromorphology and microtexture evaluation of poly(o-ethoxyaniline) films using atomic force microscopy and fractal analysis,” Jounal of Polymer Research, vol. 27, p. 299, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. G. Q. Ramos, R. S. Matos, and H. D. da Fonseca Filho, “Advanced microtexture study of Anacardium occidentale L. leaf surface from the amazon by fractal theory,” Microscopy and Microanalysis, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 989–996, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. W. S. Conceição, Ş. Ţălu, R. S. Matos, G. Q. Ramos, F. G. Zayas, and H. D. Fonseca Filho, “Stereometric characterization of Dinizia excelsa Ducke wood from Amazon rainforest using atomic force microscopy,” Microscopy Research Technique, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. D. J. Whitehouse, Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology, RC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.

Copyright © 2021 Igor Hernandes Gomes Marques et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.