BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 3258383 | 16 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3258383

Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Novel α-Amylase from Antarctic Sea Ice Bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 and Its Primary Application in Detergent

Academic Editor: Pengjun Shi
Received12 Jan 2018
Revised06 Apr 2018
Accepted02 May 2018
Published27 Jun 2018

Abstract

A novel cold-adapted and salt-tolerant α-amylase gene (amy175) from Antarctic sea ice bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 was successfully cloned and expressed. The open reading frame (ORF) of amy175 had 1722 bp encoding a protein of 573 amino acids residues. Multiple alignments indicated Amy175 had seven highly conserved sequences and the putative catalytic triad (Asp244, Glu286, and Asp372). It was the first identified member of GH13_36 subfamily which contained QPDLN in the CSR V. The recombinant enzyme (Amy175) was purified to homogeneity with a molecular mass of about 62 kDa on SDS-PAGE. It had a mixed enzyme specificity of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Amy175 displayed highest activity at pH 8.0 and 25°C and exhibited extreme salt-resistance with the maximum activity at 1 M NaCl. Amy175 was strongly stimulated by Mg2+, Ni2+, K+, 1 mM Ca2+, 1 mM Ba2+, 1 mM Pb2+, 1 mM sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) but was significantly inhibited by Cu2+, Mn2+, Hg2+, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), and 10% Tween 80. Amy175 demonstrated excellent resistance towards all the tested commercial detergents, and wash performance analysis displayed that the addition of Amy175 improved the stain removal efficiency. This study demonstrated that Amy175 would be proposed as a novel α-amylase source for industrial application in the future.

1. Introduction

α-Amylases (E.C.3.2.1.1) are hydrolytic enzymes which can randomly cleave α-1,4-glycosidic linkages in starch molecules to generate gradually smaller polymers consisting of glucose units [1, 2]. As important industrial enzymes, amylases occupy about 25-30% of the world enzyme market [3, 4] and can be applied in numerous industries such as food, fermentation, detergent, paper, textile, pharmaceutical, and fine-chemical industries [5].

Most α-amylases belong to glycoside hydrolase family 13 (GH13). Among classification systems of glycoside hydrolases (GHs), the family GH13 forms the clan GH-H together with the families 70 and 77 [6]. The classification system of GH has been incorporated into the Carbohydrate-Active enZymes database (CAZy) [7]. As the largest GH family, the family GH13 consists of more than 30 different enzyme specificities and more than 55,500 sequences (http://www.cazy.org/GH13.html). It was officially divided into 35 subfamilies by the CAZy curators in 2006 [8]. The number of GH13 subfamilies has reached 42 currently and is still updating [9, 10]. Although the overall sequences of family GH13 members own very low identity, they possess 4-7 conserved sequence regions (CSRs) and a catalytic triad (Asp, Glu, and Asp) [11, 12].

Some subfamilies of GH13 enzymes are very closely related to each other [11], such as oligo-1,6-glucosidase, neopullulanase, and the intermediary group GH13_36 subfamily. The oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily includes mainly oligo-1,6-glucosidase, α-glucosidase, trehalose synthase, sucrose isomerase, trehalose-6-phosphate hydrolase, and dextran glucosidase, and the neopullulanase subfamily consists of cyclomaltodextrinase, maltogenic amylase, and neopullulanase [13], whereas the members of GH13_36 subfamily were reported to possess a mixture of enzyme specificity of α-amylase and some others from the two above-mentioned subfamilies [12]. There were efforts to define them based on specific features in their CSRs [12]. Originally oligo-1,6-glucosidase and neopullulanase subfamily were distinguished using specific sequence motif QPDLN and MPKLN in their CSR V, respectively. The subfamily GH13_36 was described with the sequence MPDLN discriminating the former two subfamilies [13]. Therefore CSR V can be used as a selection marker. The GH13_36 enzymes also possess other additional sequence features, such as an invariant tryptophan in the CSR VI and a tyrosine preceding the tripeptide “GEE” at the end of the CSR VII. Moreover, some GH13_36 members have furthermore a histidine at the end of the CSR II and a tryptophan (or other aromatic residues) in the CSR III [14]. These features can be used as reference information for subfamily assignment of GH13_36-like protein without additional biochemical characterization.

To improve the productivities of various industries, novel α-amylases with extreme properties such as activity at low/high-temperatures and salt-tolerance need be continuously sought for and applied in harsh industrial processing conditions. Cold-adapted enzymes that catalyze the reaction at low temperatures but lose activities by a moderate heating are highly beneficial to industries and biotechnology and have obtained increasing attentions in recent years [1518]. For example, cold-adapted α-amylases can be added to detergents for cold washing to save the energy, reduce the wear, and protect the color of fabrics [1921]. In baking processes, they can be used to shorten the dough fermentation time, quickly terminate the reaction of other enzymes, and improve the properties of the bread [19]. In addition, salt-tolerant enzymes have been widely used in detergent industry and bioremediation process. Many stains on fabrics have high salt concentration that requires salt-tolerant enzymes to remove them completely. Although several cold-adapted α-amylases [2229] or salt-tolerant α-amylases [22, 24, 3033] have been found, to the best of our knowledge, very few α-amylases possess both properties.

Antarctic is a unique ecosystem on earth, which is composed of a combination of extreme cold, high salt, and strong radiations. Organisms of Antarctic have evolved their specialized cold and high salt tolerant enzymes to adapt to and survive in this harsh environment. In this work, a novel α-amylase-producing strain Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 (KU726544) was isolated and identified from Antarctic ice cover. A novel α-amylase gene of GH13_36 subfamily, amy175, isolated from Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 was cloned and expressed in E. coli, and then the recombinant protein was purified and fully characterized. In addition, the primary application of Amy175 was tested as detergent additives.

2. Methods

2.1. Identification of Strain M175

Strain M175, the α-amylase producing strain, was isolated from Antarctic sea ice (68°30′E, 65°00′S) and was grown on 2216E medium (peptone 5.0 g, yeast extract 1.0 g, FePO4·2H2O 0.01 g, seawater 1 L, pH 7.5) at 15°C with shaking at 120 rpm. The organism was identified by physiological (Gram) and biochemical tests. Two primers were used for the amplification of 16S rRNA gene: 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCA-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). Multiple sequence alignments were performed with the ClustalW software and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6.0 software.

2.2. Gene Cloning and Sequence Analysis

The genomic DNA of Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 was prepared using Bacterial DNA Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech, China). PCR primers were designed based on the sequence of the putative α-amylase gene of Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125, whose genome sequence was released in GenBank (CR954246) by Médigue et al. [34], as follows: forward primer 5′-TGTTAATAGGCGCGGTGTC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GGAGCTGTGCGTAGTAAC-3′. PCR was performed with the following conditions: 94°C, 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C, 45 s; 55°C, 1 min; 72°C, 1 min and finally 72°C, 10 min. The PCR product was inserted into pGM-T and sequenced (Sangon Biotech, China).

The open reading frame (ORF) of amy175 was determined and translated to amino acid sequence using DNAMAN 5.2.2 software. The sequence analysis was performed by the BLAST program of NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast). The prediction of signal peptide was conducted using the SignalP 4.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP). Molecular mass and theoretical pI were predicted by ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). The multiple sequence alignments were studied with 27 amylolytic enzymes from oligo-1,6-glucosidase (GH13 subfamilies 4, 16, 17, 18, 23, 29, 30, and 31), neopullulanase (GH13 subfamily 20), and GH13_36 subfamily. The neighbor-joining phylogenic tree was built by MEGA 6.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The search for protein structure template during homology modeling was done using SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/).

2.3. Expression and Purification of the Recombinant α-Amylase

The plasmid of pGM-amy175 was used as the template. To obtain the mature α-amylase, the α-amylase gene (amy175) was amplified using forward primer 5′-CGCGGATCCCCATCAACAAATACTAAC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCGCTCGAGCAGTGTGTTATTTAGTAACAAT-3′ (BamH I and Xho I sites underlined, respectively). The PCR product was gel purified, digested with BamH I and Xho I, and then ligated into the vector pET-28a(+) and transformed into competent E. coli DH5α cells. The recombinant plasmid pET-amy175 was transformed into competent E. coli BL21 (DE3) for protein expression and purification.

E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells with pET-amy175 were grown overnight at 37°C in LB medium containing 100 μg/mL kanamycin. Subsequently, 1 mL culture was inoculated into 50 mL LB medium and cultured at 37°C to an optical density of 0.6 at 600 nm. Expression was induced with 0.3 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 15°C for 12 h. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 7500 rpm for 20 min at 4°C and washed twice with the sterile water before being resuspended in the buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mg/mL lysozyme). The suspended solids were lysed using ultrasonic sonicator (Scientz, China) and then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and applied to Ni-NTA resin affinity chromatography according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Bound proteins were eluted with buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 100 mM imidazole, pH 8.0.

The purity of the recombinant α-amylase was analyzed by 12% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and the protein concentration was measured according to the Bradford method [35]. For zymogram study, the purified α-amylase was electrophoresed by SDS-free PAGE containing 1% (w/v) soluble starch. After electrophoresis, the gel was incubated in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) for 1 h and then stained by iodine solution until a clear band appeared. The purified recombinant protein was analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry with MALDI-TOF (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) using the parameters described by Li et al. [36].

2.4. α-Amylase Activity Assay

The amylase activity was measured principally according to the Miller method [37], using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS). In brief, 500 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1% (w/v) soluble starch was maintained for 5 min at the desired temperature, and then 500 μL of the purified enzyme was added to the buffer. After incubation for 10 min at 25°C, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 mL of DNS and the mixture was boiled for 5 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a UV/visible spectrophotometer (MAPADA, China). One unit of amylase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 mg/mL maltose equivalent to reducing sugars per minute under the assay conditions.

2.5. Effects of Temperature and pH on Enzymatic Activity and Stability

The optimum temperature of the enzyme against the soluble starch was investigated by incubating the reaction mixture at different temperatures (0-60°C) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0). To study the thermostability, the purified recombinant α-amylase was held at 30, 40, and 50°C for different time periods and the residual activity was measured as described above.

The optimum pH of the enzyme was analyzed by incubating the reaction mixture in the range of pH 5.0-11.0 at 25°C using the following buffers (50 mM): Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 5.0-7.0), Tris-HCl (pH 7.0-9.0), and glycine-NaOH (pH 9.0-11.0). The pH stability test was performed by incubating the enzyme in the different buffers at 25°C for 1 h. The remaining activity was measured under standard conditions as described above.

2.6. Effects of NaCl on Enzymatic Activity and Stability

The effect of NaCl on enzyme activity was tested in the range of 0-5 M at 25°C in 50 mM This-HCl buffer (pH 8.0). The effects of NaCl on enzyme stability were studied by preincubating the enzyme in 50 mM This-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) with 1 M NaCl and without NaCl, respectively, at 25°C for 0-120 min. The remaining activity was measured under standard conditions as described above. The enzyme activity at 0 min was defined as 100%.

2.7. Effects of Metal Ions and Chemical Reagents

The effects of different metal ions, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), EDTA, dithiothreitol (DTT), β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), and urea on enzyme activity were determined at the final concentration of 1 mM and 10 mM. The effects of Tween 80, Triton X-100, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on enzyme activity were tested at 1% and 10% concentrations. The enzyme activity was measured in 50 mM This-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1% (w/v) soluble starch at 25°C.

2.8. Determination of Kinetic Parameters

The kinetic parameters were determined by incubating the enzyme with different concentrations of soluble starch ranging from 0.125% to 2% (w/v) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) under standard conditions. and values were calculated from Lineweaver-Burk plot.

2.9. Substrate Specificity and Products Analysis by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)

The activities on α-, β-, and r-cyclodextrin (CD), soluble starch, glycogen, amylose, amylopectin, pullulan, and several raw starches such as potato starch, corn starch, wheat starch, and pea starch were detected using DNS method at 1% (w/v) concentration during the enzyme assay. The enzyme activity for soluble starch was defined as 100%. The activity on several oligosaccharides (maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, sucrose, isomaltose, trehalose, raffinose, panose, and melibiose) at 1% (w/v) concentration was determined by assaying the release of glucose at 25°C for various periods with a glucose assay kit (Sigma Diagnostics no. 510). Additionally, degradation of p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) was evaluated by measuring the release of p-nitrophenol at 410 nm after the reaction was terminated by adding an equal volume of 1 M Na2CO3.

To analyze the end hydrolysis product, the recombinant enzyme was incubated with 1% (w/v) soluble starch, maltose, maltotriose, and maltotetraose, in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) at 25°C for various periods and 10 μL of the reaction mixtures was submitted to TLC on 0.25-mm silica gel plates (GF254, 20 cm × 20 cm). Ethyl acetate-acetic acid-methanol-water (12:3:3:2, v/v) was used as the mobile phase, and the products were detected by exposing the plate to 2.0% aniline-2.0% diphenylamine-10.0% phosphate in acetone, followed by drying at 80°C for 15 min.

2.10. Compatibility Test with Various Commercial Detergents

To confirm the potential of the recombinant enzyme as a laundry detergent additive, its compatibility and stability against various Chinese liquid commercial detergents, such as Liby®, Walch®, OMO®, Blue Moon®, Diaopai®, Tide®, Keon®, Ariel®, and Chaoneng®, were checked. All detergents at 1% (v/v) concentration were heated at 100°C for 60 min to inactivate the endogenous enzyme prior to addition of enzyme preparation. The purified recombinant enzyme was incubated with individual detergent solution for 1 h at 25°C, respectively, and then the residual activity was determined. The reaction solution without detergents was considered as the control.

2.11. Wash Performance Analysis

Application of the recombinant enzyme as a detergent additive was evaluated on white cotton fabrics (4×4 cm2) stained with chocolate and tomato sauce. To determine stain removal efficiency, each piece of stained cloth was soaked separately in any one of the following flasks containing (a) distilled water (25 mL), (b) distilled water (20 mL) and 5 mL Tide® detergent (1%), and (c) distilled water (20 mL) and 5 mL Tide® detergent (1%) containing 12.6 U/mL of purified recombinant enzyme. The above flasks were kept at room temperature (25°C) for 1 h. After treatment, cloth pieces were rinsed with distilled water and dried. The wash performance of the purified enzyme was judged by visual examination.

2.12. Data Analysis

All data are expressed as mean value ± standard errors of at least triplicate determinations. The figures were drawn using Origin 8.0 software (OriginLab Corporation, USA) and statistical difference significance was analyzed using the SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) package for Windows.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Strain M175

Strain M175, the α-amylase producing strain, isolated from Antarctic sea ice is aerobic, Gram-negative. It forms smooth and bright yellow colonies on nutrient medium. Growth occurs at 0°C-40°C (optimal temperature, 15°C) and pH 3.0-11.0 (optimal pH, 8.0). NaCl is not essential for growth, but growth is enhanced in the presence of NaCl (optimal NaCl, 6%, tolerated up to 12%). It is positive for catalase, indol production, gelatin hydrolysis, and Voges-Proskaeur (VP) test. However, Methyl-Red (MR) test and nitrate reduction are all negative. The result of Oxidation/Fermentation (O/F) Test is oxidation. It can utilize the following substrates as carbon sources: D-glucose, D-lactose, D-maltose, D-xylose, sucrose, and starch (Table 1).


ExperimentsResults

GramGram-negative
aerobic
Growth range0-40°C, pH 3.0-11.0, 0-12% NaCl
Optimal temperature15°C
Optimal pHpH 8.0
Optimal NaCl6%
Catalase+
Indol production+
Gelatin hydrolysis+
VP+
MR-
Nitrate reduction-
O/F testOxidation
Utilization of
D-Glucose+
D-Lactose+
D-Maltose+
D-Xylose+
Sucrose+
Starch+

The 16S rDNA analysis indicated that it was closely related to the genus Pseudoalteromonas with the highest levels of similarity (99%) to Pseudoalteromonas distincta KMM (AF082564), Pseudoalteromonas elyakovii KMM (AF082562), and Pseudoalteromonas paragorgicola KMM (AY040229) (Figure 1). Based on the results including physiological, biochemical, and 16S rDNA alignment analyses, the strain was identified to be a member of Pseudoalteromonas, as Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175. The sequence has been submitted in GenBank with accession number KU726544.

3.2. Gene Cloning and Sequence Analysis

A DNA sequence (namely, amy175) of 1722 bp (GenBank accession number KC306394) was successfully cloned from Antarctic sea ice bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175. amy175 encodes a protein of 573 amino acids, which contains a predicted N-terminal signal peptide comprising 23 amino acids and a mature α-amylase (Amy175) with a calculated molecular weight of 62.4 kDa and pI of 4.9. Blastp homology search against the NCBI nonredundant protein database showed that Amy175 shared the high identity with putative α-amylase of Pseudoalteromonas nigrifaciens KMM661 (99%), Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125 (99%), Pseudoalteromonas atlantica (77%), Pseudoalteromonas undina (77%), Rheinheimera perlucida (74%), and Rheinheimera baltica (74%). However, α-amylases from bacterium KMM661 and TAC125 were reported only in NCBI database with accession numbers of WP_089368202 and WP_041454408, respectively, and no further research on their cloning and properties. Furthermore, Amy175 shared the very low sequence identity with the studied α-amylases, such as 30%, 26%, 26%, 26%, 24% 22%, and 22% identity with α-amylase from Escherichia coli, Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAB23, Pseudoalteromonas arctica GS230, Bacillus cereus, Exiguobacterium sp. SH3, Thermobifida fusca, and Lipomyces starkeyi, respectively. Therefore, Amy175 is a novel α-amylase.

The result of multiple sequence alignment indicated that Amy175 had seven highly conserved regions and the putative catalytic triad (Asp244, Glu286, and Asp372) which are the common characteristics of GH13 members [11] (Figure 2). It contained QPDLN in the CSR V characteristic for oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily. Similar to GH13_36, it had a tryptophan in the CSR VI and a tyrosine preceding the tripeptide “GEE” in its CSR VII. The tyrosine also often existed in the neopullulanase subfamily members [13]. But there was a phenylalanine rather than a histidine at the end of the CSR II, and a glycine not an aromatic residue in the CSR III. To analyze the evolutionary relationships of Amy175, 27 amylolytic enzymes that have already been biochemically characterized from these three subfamilies were selected and phylogenic tree was generated based on the neighbor-joining method by MEGA 6.0 software (Figure 3). The result revealed that Amy175 showed a closer relationship with GH13_36 members.

3.3. Expression and Purification of Amy175

The amy175 gene was successfully expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) as a His-tagged fusion protein (Figure 4(a)). A clear target band was found in the induced cells (lane 5), but not in the noninduced cells (lane 2) by SDS-PAGE analysis. The purified recombinant enzyme using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography showed a single band (lane 3) with approximate molecular mass of 62 kDa and the recombinant protein was confirmed by native-PAGE with α-amylase activity staining (lane 1). The enzyme was purified with the protein concentration of 385.1 μg/mL and a specific activity of 337.9 U/mg that was higher than that of α-amylases, e.g., Pseudoalteromonas arctica GS230 (25.5 U/mg) [23], Zunongwangia profunda (270.6 U/mg) [24], and Pseudoalteromonas sp. MY-1 (44.4 U/mg) [27], but lower than that of α--amylase from Geomyces pannorum (9.72×103 U/mg) [38]. Additionally, the purified enzyme obtained on SDS-PAGE was excised and was submitted for MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. The peptide mass fingerprint (Figure 4(b)) was matched with the available bacteria database and revealed significant matches against α-amylases from Pseudoalteromonas nigrifaciens KMM661 and Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125 with scores of 186 and 131, respectively.

3.4. The Effects of Temperature and pH on Enzymatic Activity and Stability

The influence of temperature on the activity of Amy175 was measured in the range of 0-60°C (Figure 5(a)). The result showed that Amy175 exhibited high activity at low temperature with maximum activity observed at 25°C and retained about 53.2% activity at 0°C, but its activity decreased sharply above 50°C. According to temperature-stability profile depicted in Figure 5(b), Amy175 was highly stable at 30°C and could keep about 88.6% activity after 60 min incubation, whereas at 40°C and 50°C it showed poor stability, losing about 35.5% and 72.3% activity, respectively, after 10 min incubation.

The effect of pH on the activity of Amy175 was tested in the range of pH 5.0-11.0 at 25°C (Figure 5(c)). The maximum activity was observed at pH 8.0 and more than 73.0% of the maximum activity could be still retained within pH 6.0-9.0. The pH stability results (Figure 5(d)) revealed that the enzyme was relatively stable and could remain more than 80.0% activity in a pH range of 7.0-9.0 for 1 h when assayed at 25°C, while the activity sharply decreased after preincubated at pH 10.0.

3.5. The Effects of NaCl Concentration on Enzyme Activity and Stability

The effect of NaCl on the activity of Amy175 was analyzed in the range of 0-5 M (Figure 6(a)). The enzyme exhibited the highest activity in the presence of 1 M NaCl, showing 127.5% of original activity without NaCl. It could display 87.7% of original activity even at 5 M NaCl, suggesting that Amy175 was halotolerant. In addition, the stability of enzyme was detected under the presence of 0 M and 1 M NaCl for 2 h. As shown in Figure 6(b), the presence of NaCl could improve the stability of Amy175. The activity of Amy175 was rapidly lost when preincubated without NaCl at 40°C for 120 min. However, the residual activity was increased to 82.7% and 76.7%, respectively, after preincubated with 1 M NaCl for 60 min and 120 min.

3.6. The Effects of Metal Ions and Chemical Reagents on Enzymatic Activity

Of metal ions tested (Table 2), Mg2+, Ni2+, and K+ at both tested concentrations stimulated the activity of Amy175, and the highest activity reached 171.2% in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+. Interestingly, Amy175 was increased by 1 mM Ca2+ (121.3%), Ba2+ (119.4%), and Pb2+ (112.3%) but was decreased by 10 mM Ca2+ (79.1%), Ba2+ (78.9%), and Pb2+ (73.1%). Furthermore, Cu2+, Mn2+, and Hg2+ were the strong inhibitors, and partial inhibition of Amy175 was observed in the presence of Al3+, Fe2+, Fe3+, and Cd2+.


Metal ionRelative activity (%)
1 mM10 mM

Control100±2.5100±2.5
K+105.8±5.7121.3±4.0
Ca2+121.3±2.979.1±3.9
Mg2+115.1±3.6171.2±2.5
Al3+88.8±3.776.9±3.7
Fe2+82.5±2.768.3±2.4
Fe3+98.4±2.187.9±4.4
Mn2+56.2±2.233.7±4.7
Zn2+91.2±2.1101.4±4.4
Cu2+46.6±3.424.1±2.1
Hg2+44.9±6.736.9±4.3
Pb2+112.3±2.073.1±4.1
Ba2+119.4±3.078.9±6.5
Ni2+139.4±2.9150.2±3.1
Cd2+71.3±2.856.4±4.9

Effects of several chemical reagents on Amy175 were assessed (Table 3). β-ME (10 mM) and Tween 80 (10%) strongly inhibited the enzyme activity by 31.9% and 48.4%, while DMSO (10%) and SDS (1 mM) increased the activity by 141.9% and 118.8%, and the enzyme activities were retained more than 69.0% in the presence of EDTA, DTT, Urea, and Triton X-100 at both tested concentrations.


Chemical reagentsConcentrationRelative activity (%)

ControlNone100±4.5
Tween 801%50.8±3.8
10%48.4±6.3
Triton X-1001%79.1±4.2
10%69.9±4.1
DMSO1%95.7±4.3
10%141.9±5.4
SDS1 mM118.8±4.6
10 mM77.2±3.8
EDTA1 mM102.0±5.1
10 mM88.9±4.0
DTT1 mM84.9±5.1
10 mM74.7±4.0
β-ME1 mM75.8±5.1
10 mM31.9±4.7
Urea1 mM98.9±5.7
10 mM86.9±4.0

3.7. Kinetics Parameters

Kinetic studies of Amy175 were determined under standard conditions using different concentrations of soluble starch (0.125%-2%) as substrate. As obtained from the Lineweaver-Burk plot, the and values were 2.53 mg/mL and 0.125 mg/mL/min, respectively. The value for Amy175 was lower than that of the α-amylases from Pseudoalteromonas arctica GS230 (7.28 mg/mL) [23] and Zunongwangia profunda (2.74 mg/mL) [24], but higher than that of α-amylase from Exiguobacterium sp. SH3 (2.29 mg/mL) [25].

3.8. Analysis of Substrate Specificity and Hydrolysis Products

Substrate specificity of α-amylase varies with the source of microorganism [39]. In Figure 7, Amy175 displayed the highest specificity towards amylose (131.4%), which is a linear glucose polymer connected by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds, followed by soluble starch (100%), while amylopectin (78.7%) and glycogen (29.7%) had much lower rate of hydrolysis due to more branches connected by α-1,6 glycosidic bonds in them. Moreover, Amy175 could not hydrolyze pullulan, α-, β-, and r-CD. Therefore, it is suggested that Amy175 prefers α-(1,4) linkage cleaving. Amy175 displayed the highest rate of hydrolysis towards pea starch (92.8%), followed by potato starch (82.1%), wheat starch (68.3%), and corn starch (53.1%). Amy175 showed different hydrolysis abilities towards various starches, due to the difference in particle size and shape, the ratio of amylose and amylopectin, and structure of the amylose and amylopectin molecules [40]. The result of oligosaccharides hydrolysis showed that the enzyme could not degrade other oligosaccharides except maltooligosaccharides and no glucose was observed even after incubation for 48 h. In addition, the enzyme was not able to hydrolyze pNPG. It is further indicated that the enzyme only cleaved α-(1,4) linkage.

The hydrolysis products of soluble starch analyzed by TLC for various periods were shown in Figure 8(a). At the early stage of hydrolysis, soluble starch was hydrolyzed into maltose (G2), maltotriose (G3), maltotetraose (G4), and a small amount of higher molecular weight oligosaccharides. As the reaction proceeded, glucose (G1) gradually increased; however, G2 was still the main hydrolysis product after incubation for 48 h. These hydrolysis patterns suggest that Amy175 mainly cleave α-1,4-glycosidic linkage in the interior of the starch, having great demands in the food and starch industry, such as bio-ethanol production and baking industry.

To determine whether Amy175 could perform transglycosylation, the hydrolysis products of maltooligosaccharides were analyzed by TLC (Figure 8(b)). Amy175 released a small amount of glucose from maltose at 1 h. When maltotriose and maltotetraose were degraded, Amy175 also produced oligosaccharides that were one-glucose unit smaller than the substrates. It is noteworthy that the oligosaccharides that were larger than the original substrates were produced by Amy175, especially when maltotriose was hydrolyzed for 1 h. The results suggested that Amy175 possessed transglycosylation activity.

3.9. Detergency Characteristics

To confirm the application of Amy175 in detergent formulations, its stability was investigated in presence of various commercial detergents (Figure 9). The result revealed that Amy175 exhibited extreme stability with all the tested commercial laundry detergents and more than 76.9% residual amylase activity was retained. Chaoneng® was most compatible, since after 1 h of incubation at 25°C, 99.3% of its initial activity remained.

3.10. Wash Performance Analysis

Stained cotton fabrics washed by three different sets of washing solutions revealed that a combination of the purified α-amylase and detergent (Tide®) together resulted in best washing (Figure 10). Although the detergent alone showed fainted washing effect on chocolate and tomato sauce spots (starch rich), addition of Amy175 (with 12.6 U/mL of activity) improved the stain removal efficiency. This result indicated that Amy175 could be employed as potential laundry detergent additive.

4. Discussion

In this study, a novel cold-adapted, salt-tolerant, and detergent-stable α-amylase gene (amy175) from Antarctic sea ice bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 was cloned, expressed, and characterized.

Amy175 had seven highly conserved regions and the putative catalytic triad. It contained QPDLN in the CSR V features for oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily. Although CSR V was often used as a selection marker, CSR V alone could not be enough to identify a GH13 protein’s subfamily. Several GH13 amylolytic enzymes and proteins with MPDLN were assigned to the oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily, such as the proteins from Lactobacillus sakei (UniProt: Q38WC9), Grosmannia clavigera (UniProt: F0XH23), and Sordaria macrospora (UniProt: D1ZB31) [14]. Furthermore, the mammalian amino acid transporter also contained the oligo-1,6-glucosidase-type of QPDLN [12]. Of course, no QPDLN-containing proteins have been assigned to the GH13_36 subfamily so far. Amy175 behaved like the member of the GH13_36 subfamily in the CSR VI and CSR VII. However, unlike most GH13_36 members, it did not have a histidine at the end of the CSR II, which was similar to the intermediary GH13_36 α-amylase from Bacillus clarkii (UniProt: B9A1J7). Moreover, it did not contain an aromatic residue in the CSR III, and several GH13_36 enzymes from Xanthomonas campestris (UniProt: Q60102), Thermotoga maritima (UniProt: P96107), and uncultured bacterium (UniProt: Q6TXT5) also had similar characteristics. The evolutionary relationships among 27 amylolytic enzymes from GH13 family showed that Amy175 possessed a closer relationship with GH13_36 subfamily.

For most GH13_36 members, the intermediary GH13_36 α-amylase AmyA (PDB: 1WZA) from Halothermothrix orenii [40] was recognized as the best template, while the best templates for a few GH13_36 members were also identified from oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily [14]. The best structural template of Amy175 for homology modeling showed by SWISS-MODEL was a trehalose synthase (PDB: 5H2T) from the oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily. Its coverage value (0.87) was higher than AmyA with coverage value of 0.74. However, its sequence identity with Amy175 was only 31.59, lower than 41.37 of AmyA. On the other hand, this trehalose synthase was described as a homotetramer, while the result of native-PAGE indicated that Amy175 should be a monomer. Therefore, α-amylase AmyA was more suitable as the template, and Amy175 was similar to GH13_36 α-amylase structurally.

The result that Amy175 degraded the soluble starch to several maltooligosaccharides suggests that Amy175 mainly hydrolyze starch internally (Figure 8(a)). It could not hydrolyze pNPG and other oligosaccharides except maltooligosaccharides, which demonstrated Amy175 could not cleave α-1,6-, α-1,1, and α-1,2 bond, but could catalyze the hydrolysis of terminal α-1,4-glucosidic linkages. Moreover, Amy175 possessed transglycosylation activity. These hydrolysis patterns suggest that Amy175 have not only α-amylase activity, but also α-glucosidase activity from oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily. Thus, Amy175 should be a novel member of α-amylase GH13_36 subfamily, which often possess a mixed enzyme specificity of α-amylase, oligo-1,6-glucosidase subfamily, and neopullulanase subfamily [12].

To date, several cold-adapted α-amylases which have been cloned and expressed were listed in Table 4. Amy175 showed lower optimal temperature (25°C) than other cold-adapted α-amylases, with exceptions of AHA (25°C) from the psychrophilic bacterium Alteromonas haloplanktis and Amy13C6 (10-15°C) from a metagenomic library. Furthermore, Amy175 could still keep 53.2% maximum activity at 0°C, while the activities retained at 0°C by AmyZ from Zunongwangia profunda [24], ParAmy from Pseudoalteromonas arctica GS230 [23], and AHA from Alteromonas haloplanktis [22] were 39.0%, 34.5%, and 20.0%, respectively. However, the activity of Amy175 decreased sharply above 50°C and only about 64.5% and 27.7% activity were retained, respectively, after 10 min incubation at 40°C and 50°C, indicating relatively low thermostability, which is the typical characteristic of cold-adapted enzymes and makes inactivating the enzyme in special applications more easy and rapid [41].


Source and α-amylaseMolecular weight (kDa)/sizeIdentity with Amy175Temperature optimum (°C)Residual activity at 0°CpH optimumNaCl (M) for optimum activityActivatorsInhibitorsReference

Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 (Amy175)62/550 aa-2553.2%8.01DMSO, Mg2+, Ni2+, K+ and
1 mM Ca2+, Ba2+, Pb2+
Cu2+, Hg2+, Mn2+, Tween 80, β-METhis study
Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAB23
(AHA)
49/453 aa26%2520%7.00.5--[21]
Pseudoalteromonas arctica GS230
(ParAmy)
55/477 aa26%3034.5%7.5-Mn2+, K+, Na+Hg2+, Cu2+, Fe3+[22]
Pseudoalteromonas sp. MY-1 (rAmyA)73/669 aa-40-7.0-K+, Na+, Ca2+-[26]
Zunongwangia Profunda (AmyZ)66/594 aa26%3539%7.01.5Sr2+, Fe3+, Mg2+, Ba2+, , K+Cu2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, SDS, EDTA[23]
Exiguobacterium sp. SH3 (AmyE)53/509 aa24%304%6.52Triton X-100, Tween 20Acetone, DMSO, Butanol[25]
uncultured organism ()56/486 aa22%10-1570% at 1°C8.0-9.0-Ca2+Cu2+, Zn2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, SDS, EDTA, Tween 20, Triton X-100[27]
Geomyces pannorum54/497 aa-40over 20%5.0---[40]
Arthrobacter agilis PAMC 2738880/720 aa-30-3.0-Fe3+, β-ME, ammonium persulphate (APS), SDS, Triton X-100, urea [38]

Cold-adapted enzymes can carry out their functions at very low temperature because of their flexible structures [22]. Cold-adapted enzymes usually possess less arginine residues or a lower arginine/(arginine and lysine) ratio than the mesophilic and thermophilic enzymes [42]. Arginine is famous as a stabilizing residue and can reduce the flexibility by forming hydrogen bands and salt bridges with the guanidinium group [42, 43]. Analysis of the amino acid sequence showed that Amy175 has less arginine residues and a lower arginine/(arginine and lysine) ratio than some other cold-active, mesophilic, or thermophilic α-amylases, which may partly explain its cold activity (Table 5).


α-amylaseSpecial featureOptimal temperature (°C)Arg (%)Arg/(Arg+lys)ratioReference

Amy175Cold active252.70.32This study
AHACold active252.90.5[21]
ParAmyCold active302.90.5[22]
AmyZCold active353.50.36[23]
Amy13Mesophilic604.60.62[43]
Gt-amyThermophilic804.00.4[44]
AmyCThermophilic905.40.42[45]

The compositions of arginine and lysine in α-amylases were obtained from Genbank.

Another noticeable characteristic of Amy175 was its salt-tolerance. Amy175 exhibited the activity in a wide range of 0-5 M NaCl with the highest activity in the presence of 1 M NaCl (127.5% of original activity) and 87.7% activity was retained even at 5 M NaCl (Figure 6(a)). However, Amy175 is a salt-tolerant enzyme, but not a halophilic enzyme, because halophilic enzymes would be unstable and rapidly lose the activities in the absence of the salt [46], such as the halophilic α-amylases produced by Marinobacter sp. EMB8 [30] and Halorubrum xinjiangense [31]. In addition, the stability of Amy175 could be dramatically improved by NaCl (Figure 6(b)), which was similar to that of the α-amylases from marine bacterium Zunongwangia profunda [24, 32] and halophile bacterium Halothermothrix orenii [33]. Some researches showed that the hydrophobic interactions of enzyme core structures were possibly enhanced by salting-out effect under high salinity and made enzymes more compact and stable [26], which might be helpful to enhance the stability of these enzymes.

Halophilic and salt-tolerant α-amylases have more acidic amino acids residues (Asp and Glu) than basic amino acids residues (Lys and Arg) [47]. An abundance of acidic amino acids produces a negative surface potential, promoting the formation of the hydrated salt ions network that reduces the tendency of aggregation and keeps the enzyme activity and stability under high salinity [4850]. The proportion of acidic amino acid excess of Amy175 is 5.0%, which was higher than that of AHA (4.2%) from Alteromonas haloplanktis and Amy13A (4.8%) isolated from a pilot-plant biogas reactor, but lower than that of AmyZ (5.7%) from Zunongwangia profunda, AmyH (10.4%) from the halophilic archaeon Haloarcula hispanica, and α- (18.9%) from the archaebacterium Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 (Table 6). In addition, Amy175 was predicted to be an extracellular enzyme with N-terminal signal peptide of 23 amino acids. Qin et al. [24] found that the extracellular proteins were more salt-tolerant than intracellular proteins by studying the proteins from Zunongwangia profunda.


α-amylaseSpecial featureNaCl (M) for optimum activityAsp+Glu (%)Arg+lys (%)Excess acidic amino acids (%)Reference

Amy175Halotolerant113.38.35.0This study
AHAHalotolerant0.510.45.74.7[21]
AmyZHalotolerant1.515.49.75.7[23]
Amy13AHalotolerant0.8616.711.94.8[48]
AmyHHalophile416.56.110.4[51]
α-Haloalkaliphilic2.524.35.418.9[52]

The amino acid compositions of α-amylases were obtained from Genbank.

Additionally, effects of various metal ions and chemical reagents on enzyme activity were studied (Tables 2 and 3). Cu2+, Mn2+, and Hg2+ strongly decreased activity of Amy175. These metal ions may inhibit the enzyme activity by either binding to catalytic residues or replacing the required metal ions [53]. The α-amylases from Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 [54] and Eisenia foetida [55] were also inhibited by Cu2+ and Hg2+, whereas some α-amylases, i.e., α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis AT70, were activated by Cu2+ [56]. Nies reported that Hg2+ could bind to thiol groups in the α-amylase structure to reduce its activity [57]. Amy175 was also inhibited by β-ME (10 mM) and Tween 80 (10%). In contrast, the α-amylase of Arthrobacter agilis PAMC 27388 was enhanced by β-ME [58]. Interestingly, DMSO (10%) and SDS (1 mM) increased the activity of Amy175. The enzyme resistance towards SDS is a good characteristic, particularly in detergent industry, and SDS-stable amylases have been rarely reported [59]. Furthermore, Amy175 exhibited the tolerance to other chemical reagents and could keep more than 69.0% of the original activity. Despite loss of activity of the most α-amylases with EDTA [60, 61], Amy175 had completely retained its original activity with 1 mM EDTA and kept 88.9% of its original activity even with 10 mM EDTA, which was similar to the result on Bacillus KSM-K38 α-amylase [62]. In addition, the activity of the α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis AT70 increased about 145% in the presence of EDTA [56]. Arikan reported that some alkaline amylases were unaffected by chelator EDTA [63]. It is probable that some metal ions can activate Amy175, but they are not essential for the catalytic reaction process.

Amy175 demonstrated not only good tolerance towards some chemical reagents, but also excellent stability against all the tested commercial detergents. In contrast, the α-amylase from marine Streptomyces sp. D1 retained only 35-70% of its original activity in the presence of commercial detergents [64]. Some components of commercial detergents, for example, anionic surfactants, water softening builders, and stabilizers, may have inhibitory effect on the α-amylase activity, while some other ingredients such as ethoxylated surfactants and nonionic copolymeric builders may stimulate the α-amylase activity [65]. Therefore, the residual amylase activity is the result of combining effects of different ingredients in the detergents.

Furthermore, the addition of Amy175 led to better stain removal from cotton fabrics than that of detergent and water alone. The amylases can help to enhance wash performance by effectively breaking down starch rich stains, protect the environment due to the biodegradability of enzymes, and make laundry detergent more sustainable [20]. All above results suggested that Amy175 could be added to laundry detergent formulations, for enhancing the ability of detergents to clean clothes in cold water.

5. Conclusion

In summary, a novel α-amylase-producing strain Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175 (KU726544) was isolated from Antarctic ice cover and identified by physiological, biochemical, and 16S rDNA alignment analyses. A novel α-amylase, Amy175, from Pseudoalteromonas sp. M175, was expressed and purified. To our knowledge, it was the first identified member of GH13_36 subfamily containing QPDLN in CSR V. It was found to have a mixed enzyme specificity of α-amylase and α-glucosidase and possess several remarkable extreme-condition tolerance characteristics: cold-active, salt-tolerant, and relatively stable in various detergents. Such distinctive characteristics suggest that this enzyme has potential industrial applications in which low temperature-processing is required, and/or the high concentration of salts is present, and/or the residue solvents remained from prior treatments. With the global trend of using low temperature processing to save energy, cold-active amylases such as Amy175 would be a promising enzyme candidate to be used for industries such as food, detergent, and textile.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaofei Wang carried out the major experimental work and drafted the manuscript. Hua Wen participated in application of the recombinant α-amylase in detergent. Cuijuan Shi and Qiuju xie contributed to the statistical analysis. Guangfeng Kan and Xiulian Ren participated in the study design. Geng Yu and Michael Betenbaugh helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Key Technologies R&D Program of Shandong (Grant nos. 2013G0021502 and 2016ZDJQ0206) and Science and Technology Project of Weihai and Natural Scientific Research Innovation Foundation in HIT (Grant nos. HIT.IBRSEM.2013037 and HIT.NSRIF.2016085).

References

  1. R. Gupta, P. Gigras, H. Mohapatra, V. K. Goswami, and B. Chauhan, “Microbial α-amylases: a biotechnological perspective,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1599–1616, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Kandra, “α-amylases of medical and industrial importance,” Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, vol. 666-667, pp. 487–498, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Rajagopalan and C. Krishnan, “α-Amylase production from catabolite derepressed Bacillus subtilis KCC103 utilizing sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 3044–3050, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. S. Reddy, A. Nimmagadda, and K. R. S. S. Rao, “An overview of the microbial α-amylase family,” African Journal of Biotechnolog, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 645–648, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. Pandey, P. Nigam, C. R. Soccol, V. T. Soccol, D. Singh, and R. Mohan, “Advances in microbial amylases,” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 135–152, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. I. Cantarel, P. M. Coutinho, C. Rancurel, T. Bernard, V. Lombard, and B. Henrissat, “Carbohydrate active enzymes database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. D233–D238, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  7. V. Lombard, H. Golaconda Ramulu, E. Drula, P. M. Coutinho, and B. Henrissat, “The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. D490–D495, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. R. Stam, E. G. J. Danchin, C. Rancurel, P. M. Coutinho, and B. Henrissat, “Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of α-amylase-related proteins,” Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 555–562, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. Valk, R. M. Van Der Kaaij, and L. Dijkhuizen, “Characterization of the starch-acting MaAmyB enzyme from Microbacterium aurum B8.A representing the novel subfamily GH13-42 with an unusual, multi-domain organization,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  10. Q. Zhang, Y. Han, and H. Xiao, “Microbial α-amylase: A biomolecular overview,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 53, pp. 88–101, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. MacGregor, Š. Janeček, and B. Svensson, “Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, vol. 1546, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Š. Janeček, “How many conserved sequence regions are there in the α-amylase family?” Biologia, vol. 57, supplement 11, pp. 29–41, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. Oslancová and Š. Janeček, “Oligo-1,6-glucosidase and neopullulanase enzyme subfamilies from the α-amylase family defined by the fifth conserved sequence region,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1945–1959, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Majzlová, Z. Pukajová, and Š. Janeček, “Tracing the evolution of the α-amylase subfamily GH13-36 covering the amylolytic enzymes intermediate between oligo-1,6-glucosidases and neopullulanases,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 367, pp. 48–57, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Cavicchioli, T. Charlton, H. Ertan, S. M. Omar, K. S. Siddiqui, and T. J. Williams, “Biotechnological uses of enzymes from psychrophiles,” Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 449–460, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Feller, “Psychrophilic Enzymes: From Folding to Function and Biotechnology,” Scientifica, vol. 2013, pp. 1–28, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Santiago, C. A. Ramírez-Sarmiento, R. A. Zamora, and L. P. Parra, “Discovery, Molecular Mechanisms, and Industrial Applications of Cold-Active Enzymes,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 89, Article ID 1408, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. N. Yadav, S. G. Sachan, P. Verma, R. Kaushik, and A. K. Saxena, “Cold active hydrolytic enzymes production by psychrotrophic Bacilli isolated from three sub-glacial lakes of NW Indian Himalayas,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 294–307, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Gerday, M. Aittaleb, M. Bentahir et al., “Cold-adapted enzymes: From fundamentals to biotechnology,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 103–107, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Kuddus, Roohi, J. M. Arif, and P. W. Ramteke, “An overview of cold-active microbial A-amylase: Adaptation strategies and biotechnological potentials,” Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 246–258, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Hiteshi and R. Gupta, “Thermal adaptation of α-amylases: a review,” Extremophiles, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 937–944, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Feller, T. Lonhienne, C. Deroanne, C. Libioulle, J. Van Beeumen, and C. Gerday, “Purification, characterization, and nucleotide sequence of the thermolabile α-amylase from the antarctic psychrotroph Alteromonas haloplanctis A23,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 8, pp. 5217–5221, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  23. M. Lu, S. Wang, Y. Fang, H. Li, S. Liu, and H. Liu, “Cloning, expression, purification, and characterization of cold-adapted α-amylase from Pseudoalteromonas arctica GS230,” The Protein Journal, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 591–597, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Qin, Z. Huang, and Z. Liu, “A novel cold-active and salt-tolerant α-amylase from marine bacterium Zunongwangia profunda: Molecular cloning, heterologous expression and biochemical characterization,” Extremophiles, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 271–281, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Mojallali, H. Shahbani Zahiri, S. Rajaei, K. Akbari Noghabi, and K. Haghbeen, “A novel ~34-kDa α-amylase from psychrotroph Exiguobacterium sp. SH3: Production, purification, and characterization,” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 118–125, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Emampour, K. A. Noghabi, and H. S. Zahiri, “Molecular cloning and biochemical characterization of a novel cold-adapted alpha-amylase with multiple extremozyme characteristics,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, vol. 111, pp. 79–86, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. X. Tao, M.-S. Jang, K.-S. Kim, Z. Yu, and Y.-C. Lee, “Molecular cloning, expression and characterization of α-amylase gene from a marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. MY-1,” Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 305–309, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. K. Vester, M. A. Glaring, and P. Stougaard, “An exceptionally cold-adapted alpha-amylase from a metagenomic library of a cold and alkaline environment,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 717–727, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. N. Samie, K. A. Noghabi, Z. Gharegozloo et al., “Psychrophilic α-amylase from Aeromonas veronii NS07 isolated from farm soils,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1381–1387, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Kumar and S. K. Khare, “Purification and characterization of maltooligosaccharide-forming α-amylase from moderately halophilic Marinobacter sp. EMB8,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 116, pp. 247–251, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Moshfegh, A. R. Shahverdi, G. Zarrini, and M. A. Faramarzi, “Biochemical characterization of an extracellular polyextremophilic α-amylase from the halophilic archaeon Halorubrum xinjiangense,” Extremophiles, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 677–687, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. Wu, Y. Qin, Q. Cheng, and Z. Liu, “Characterization of a novel alkali-stable and salt-tolerant α-amylase from marine bacterium Zunongwangia profunda,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, vol. 110, pp. 8–15, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. N. Mijts and B. K. C. Patel, “Cloning, sequencing and expression of an α-amylase gene, amyA, from the thermophilic halophile Halothermothrix orenii and purification and biochemical characterization of the recombinant enzyme,” Microbiology, vol. 148, no. 8, pp. 2343–2349, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. Médigue, E. Krin, G. Pascal et al., “Coping with cold: The genome of the versatile marine Antarctica bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125,” Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1325–1335, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L.-L. Li, J. Gao, H.-S. Jiang, and Z.-Y. Wang, “Production of 3-Hydroxybutyrate Monomers by Pseudomonas mendocina DS04-T Biodegraded Polyhydroxybutyrate,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 826–832, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. L. Miller, “Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 426–428, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Mao, Y. Yin, L. Zhang, S. A. Alias, B. Gao, and D. Wei, “Development of a novel Aspergillus uracil deficient expression system and its application in expressing a cold-adapted α-amylase gene from Antarctic fungi Geomyces pannorum,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1581–1590, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. V. Avdiiuk and L. D. Varbanets', “Microbial alpha-amylases: physicochemical properties, substrate specificity and domain structure,” Ukrainskiǐ Biokhimicheskiǐ Zhurnal, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 5–19, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  40. T. Bhanja Dey and R. Banerjee, “Purification, biochemical characterization and application of α-amylase produced by Aspergillus oryzae IFO-30103,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J.-C. Marx, T. Collins, S. D'Amico, G. Feller, and C. Gerday, “Cold-adapted enzymes from marine Antarctic microorganisms,” Marine Biotechnology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 293–304, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. S. Siddiqui and R. Cavicchioli, “Cold-adapted enzymes,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 75, pp. 403–433, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. N. Aghajari, G. Feller, C. Gerday, and R. Haser, “Structures of the psychrophilic Alteromonas haloplanctis α-amylase give insights into cold adaptation at a molecular level,” Structure, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1503–1516, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C.-H. Yang and W.-H. Liu, “Cloning and characterization of a maltotriose-producing α-amylase gene from Thermobifida fusca,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 325–330, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. D. Mehta and T. Satyanarayana, “Biochemical and molecular characterization of recombinant acidic and thermostable raw-starch hydrolysing α-amylase from an extreme thermophile Geobacillus thermoleovorans,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, vol. 85-86, pp. 229–238, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. Madern, C. Ebel, and G. Zaccai, “Halophilic adaptation of enzymes,” Extremophiles, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. J. Danson and D. W. Hough, “The structural basis of protein halophilicity,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 307–312, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  48. S. Fukuchi, K. Yoshimune, M. Wakayama, M. Moriguchi, and K. Nishikawa, “Unique amino acid composition of proteins in halophilic bacteria,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 327, no. 2, pp. 347–357, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Ballschmiter, O. Fütterer, and W. Liebl, “Identification and characterization of a novel intracellular alkaline α-amylase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima MSB8,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 2206–2211, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. D. Madern, M. Camacho, A. Rodríguez-Arnedo, M.-J. Bonete, and G. Zaccai, “Salt-dependent studies of NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase from the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii,” Extremophiles, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 377–384, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. Jabbour, A. Sorger, K. Sahm, and G. Antranikian, “A highly thermoactive and salt-tolerant α-amylase isolated from a pilot-plant biogas reactor,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 2971–2978, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. W. Hutcheon, N. Vasisht, and A. Bolhuis, “Characterisation of a highly stable α-amylase from the halophilic archaeon Haloarcula hispanica,” Extremophiles, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 487–495, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Nirmala and G. Muralikrishna, “Three α-amylases from malted finger millet (ragi, Eleusine coracana, Indaf-15)—purification and partial characterization,” Phytochemistry, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. Chang, Y.-S. Lee, S.-J. Fang, I.-H. Park, and Y.-L. Choi, “Recombinant expression and characterization of an organic-solvent-tolerant α-amylase from exiguobacterium sp. DAU5,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 1870–1883, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. Ueda, T. Asano, M. Nakazawa, K. Miyatake, and K. Inouye, “Purification and characterization of novel raw-starch-digesting and cold-adapted α-amylases from Eisenia foetida,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - B Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 125–130, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. Afrisham, A. Badoei-Dalfard, A. Namaki-Shoushtari, and Z. Karami, “Characterization of a thermostable, CaCl2-activated and raw-starch hydrolyzing alpha-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis AT70: Production under solid state fermentation by utilizing agricultural wastes,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, vol. 132, pp. 98–106, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. D. H. Nies, “Microbial heavy-metal resistance,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 730–750, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S.-M. Kim, H. Park, and J.-I. Choi, “Cloning and Characterization of Cold-Adapted α-Amylase from Antarctic Arthrobacter agilis,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 1048–1059, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. N. Hmidet, N. El-Hadj Ali, A. Haddar, S. Kanoun, S.-K. Alya, and M. Nasri, “Alkaline proteases and thermostable α-amylase co-produced by Bacillus licheniformis NH1: characterization and potential application as detergent additive,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 47, no. 1–3, pp. 71–79, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Mahdavi, R. H. Sajedi, M. Rassa, and V. Jafarian, “Characterization of an α-amylase with broad temperature activity from an acid-neutralizing Bacillus cereus strain,” Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  61. Y. Kolcuoǧlu, A. Colak, O. Faiz, and A. O. Belduz, “Cloning, expression and characterization of highly thermo- and pH-stable maltogenic amylase from a thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus caldoxylosilyticus TK4,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 821–828, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. H. Hagihara, K. Igarashi, Y. Hayashi et al., “Novel α-Amylase That Is Highly Resistant to Chelating Reagents and Chemical Oxidants from the Alkaliphilic Bacillus Isolate KSM-K38,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1744–1750, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. B. Arikan, “Highly thermostable, thermophilic, alkaline, SDS and chelator resistant amylase from a thermophilic Bacillus sp. isolate A3-15,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 3071–3076, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. Chakraborty, A. Khopade, C. Kokare, K. Mahadik, and B. Chopade, “Isolation and characterization of novel α-amylase from marine Streptomyces sp. D1,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, vol. 58, no. 1–4, pp. 17–23, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. K.-H. Maurer, “Detergent proteases,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 330–334, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Xiaofei Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1221 Views | 532 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.