Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Biological Values of Acupuncture and Chinese Herbal Medicine: Impact on the Life Science

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 360302 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/360302

Li-hua Jiang, Nian-yun Yang, Xiao-lin Yuan, Yi-jie Zou, Ze-qun Jiang, Feng-ming Zhao, Jian-ping Chen, Ming-yan Wang, Da-xiang Lu, "Microarray Analysis of mRNA and MicroRNA Expression Profile Reveals the Role of β-Sitosterol-D-glucoside in the Proliferation of Neural Stem Cell", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 360302, 12 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/360302

Microarray Analysis of mRNA and MicroRNA Expression Profile Reveals the Role of β-Sitosterol-D-glucoside in the Proliferation of Neural Stem Cell

Academic Editor: Xiang-Yu Hou
Received11 Jun 2013
Accepted27 Sep 2013
Published11 Dec 2013

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) are self-regenerating cells, but their regenerative capacity is limited. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of β-sitosterol-D-glucoside (BSSG) on the proliferation of hippocampal NSCs and to determine the corresponding molecular mechanism. Results of CCK-8 assay showed that BSSG significantly increased NSC proliferation and the effectiveness of BSSG was similar to that of basic fibroblast growth factor and epidermal growth factor. mRNA expression profiling showed that 960 genes were differentially expressed after NSCs were treated with BSSG. Among the 960 genes, IGF1 is considered as a key regulatory gene that functionally promotes NSC proliferation. MicroRNA (miRNA) expression profiling indicated that 30 and 84 miRNAs were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. miRNA-mRNA relevance analysis revealed that numerous mRNAs including IGF1 mRNA were negatively regulated by miRNAs with decreased expression, thereby increasing the corresponding mRNA expression. The increased expression of IGF1 protein was validated by ELISA. Picropodophyllin (PPP, an inhibitor of IGF-1R) inhibition test confirmed that the proliferation-enhancing effect depended on IGF1. This study provided information about BSSG as an efficient and inexpensive growth factor alternative, of which the effect is closely involved in IGF1.

1. Introduction

Neural stem cells (NSCs) are defined as undifferentiated cells that have the ability of self-renewal and the potential to generate neurons, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system [1, 2]. NSCs are located in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and the subgranular zone (SGZ) of hippocampus. NSCs and neural regeneration have been extensively studied to provide proper treatment for encephalic diseases [3, 4] by cell transplantation. However, a majority of NSCs are arrested at the G0 phase of the mitotic cell cycle; such a limited regenerative capacity of endogenous and grafted NSCs is attributed to the inhibition of NSC proliferation and neurogenesis [5]. Studies have also suggested that several active components of herbs such as Tenuigenin [6] and mitogens such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) [7] and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) [8] accelerate NSC proliferation. However, these active components are costly or chemically unstable, limiting their application. Therefore, reliable alternative chemical components should be identified.

In this study, the first confirmation that β-sitosterol-D-glucoside (BSSG, a sterolin) increases the proliferation of hippocampal NSCs was presented. Studies have showed multiple biological activity of BSSG, including anti-inflammatory effects [9, 10], anthelmintic activity [11], and immunomodulating activity [12, 13]. In the study, BSSG promoted NSC proliferation as a result of regulation of numerous genes, especially increasing IGF1 expression.

Recent advances in bioinformatics and high-throughput technologies such as microarray analysis are bringing about a revolution in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying biological processes. In this study, mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) expression microarray analyses were performed to understand the molecular mechanism of the effect on NSCs. miRNAs are small endogenous, noncoding RNAs that are highly conserved and that have been recognized as a powerful tool for regulating gene expression through the RNA interference pathway [14, 15]. With the ability of one miRNA to bind and regulate numerous mRNAs and the potential for a single mRNA to be targeted by multiple miRNAs, it is possible to fine-tune the expression of proteins within the cell in a very precise manner [16].

Some analytical methods are applied in the microarray analysis, including Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. GO analysis (http://www.geneontology.org/) provides a controlled vocabulary to describe the gene and the gene product attributes in any organism. GO covers three domains: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function [17]. Biological process refers to a biological objective to which the gene or gene product contributes. A process is accomplished via one or more ordered assemblies of molecular functions. Molecular function is defined as the biochemical activity of a gene product. Cellular component refers to the place in the cell where a gene product is active. These terms reflect our understanding of eukaryotic cell structure. Among these domains, biological process helps understand the biological functions specifying where or when the event actually occurs. Thus, biological process was used to describe the specific biological functions of differentially expressed genes. In addition, genic network analysis helps understand the interacting genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of BSSG

BSSG (purity: 98%, provided by Department of Pharmacognosy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine) stock solution was prepared in Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). Before each experiment was performed, the solution was diluted in a fresh medium to obtain a final DMSO concentration of ≤0.1%.

2.2. Primary NSC Culture and Identification

Primary NSC culture was established according to a previously published protocol [18]. In brief, the hippocampus of a Sprague-Dawley rat embryo at 16 d of embryonic stage was dissected in cold CMF-HBSS and then dissociated mechanically. The cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in a neurobasal medium (Gibco, CA, USA) supplemented with epidermal growth factor (EGF, 20 ng/mL; PeproTech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, 20 ng/mL; PeproTech Inc. USA), B27 supplement (2%; Gibco, USA), penicillin (50 U/mL), and streptomycin (50 μg/mL). The cells were adjusted to a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL and planted in culture flasks. The medium was replaced with 1/2 of the same medium at an interval of 3 d. The cells were stained by immunocytochemistry with primary antibody against nestin (Boshide, Wuhan, China) to make the identification of NSCs.

2.3. CCK-8 Assay
2.3.1. Dose-Dependent Cell Proliferation Detection

Dose-dependent cell viability was monitored using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. CCK-8 is a sensitive nonradioactive colorimetric assay used to determine the number of viable cells in cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. In the study, NSCs were cultured in 96-well plates containing the growth culture medium at a cell density of 5 × 103 cells per well. The cells were divided into nine groups: control group and BSSG treatment groups (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 100 μM BSSG). Each group was designed to establish six double-pore treatments. Each BSSG treatment group was treated with the corresponding amount of BSSG. The cells were treated for 72 h as described, whereafter CCK-8 solution (Beyotime Biotech, Haimen, China) was added to the cell culture medium to a final concentration of 10 μL/100 μL and incubated for another 4 h at 37°C. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm to determine cell viability as a percentage, using a microplate reader (ELx800, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

2.3.2. Comparison of NSC Proliferation Promoted by BSSG, bFGF, and EGF

To understand the effectiveness of BSSG on enhancing NSCs proliferation, we compared BSSG with bFGF and EGF by performing CCK-8 assay. The cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a cell density of 1 × 104 cells per well and then divided into six treatment groups: bFGF and EGF vacancy group (bFGFEGF: with neurobasal medium and B27 supplement); bFGF group (with neurobasal medium, B27 supplement, and bFGF 20 ng/mL); EGF group (with neurobasal medium, B27 supplement, and EGF 20 ng/mL); and bFGFEGF + BSSG groups (10, 20, and 40 μM). The cells were treated for 72 h as described above, and CCK-8 assay was performed.

2.4. mRNA Expression Microarray Analysis
2.4.1. mRNA Expression Profiling

mRNA expression microarray analysis was performed by use of Roche-NimbleGen Rattus norvegicus 12 × 135 K Array (Roche, supplied by KangChen Corp), in order to understand the effect of BSSG on regulation of mRNA, disclosing the mechanism of BSSG promoting NSCs proliferation.

Total RNA was obtained from each sample (five samples from the control group and five samples from the BSSG-treated group (40 μM), the cells were treated for 72 h as described above) and quantified by NanoDrop ND-1000. The total RNA was used for labeling and array hybridization based on the following steps: (1) reverse transcription using superscript ds-cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, USA); (2) ds-cDNA labeling using one-color DNA labeling kit (Roche NimbleGen, USA); (3) array hybridization using NimbleGen hybridization system and washed using NimbleGen wash buffer kit; and (4) array scanning using the Axon GenePix 4000B microarray scanner (Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

The scanned images were imported into the NimbleScan software (version 2.6) for grid alignment and expression data analysis. The expression data were normalized by quartile normalization and robust multichip average (RMA) algorithm included in the NimbleScan software. The probe level files and the gene level files were generated after normalization. The ten gene level files were imported into Agilent GeneSpring GX software (version 11.5.1) for further analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified by volcano plot filtering ( value < 0.05; fold change ≥2.0 or ≤0.5).

The genic network was plotted by use of the search tool STRING (http://string-db.org/) and drawing tool cytoscape. Then the connectivity analysis of the network was performed to obtain the “hubs” of the gene nodes, using one-side Fisher’s exact test [19]. Network “nodes” (or “components”) represent genes. Nodes with large degree values are commonly referred to as “hubs.” The hub genes were considered as the important genes, which play significant roles in the functions and structure of cells.

2.4.2. Real-Time PCR Validation for mRNA Expression Profiling

Real-time PCR was performed to validate the mRNA expression profiling obtained. Total RNA (obtained from the same samples as mentioned in mRNA microarray analysis) was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed using the ABI PRISM7900 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), in the presence of forward and reverse primers for the target genes, or forward and reverse primers for the GAPDH gene used as reference. Relative quantification of the target gene is determined by calculating the ratio between the concentration of the target gene and that of the reference.

The primer sequences of the GAPDH gene and the target genes are listed in Table 1.


GenePrimer sequenceAnnealing temperature (°C)Product length (bp)

GAPDHF: 5′-GGAAAGCTGTGGCGTGAT-3′60308
R: 5′-AAGGTGGAAGAATGGGAGTT-3′
IGF1F: 5′-CTGGCACTCTGCTTGCTCAC-3′60180
R: 5′-CTCATCCACAATGCCCGTCT-3′
cdkn1cF: 5′-CCTCCCGTTCCCTTCTTTCT-3′6096
R: 5′-CGTTCCATCGCTGTTCTGC-3′
Espl1F: 5′-TGACTACCTGGGCGTGACTG-3′6098
R: 5′-CTGGCTCTGAGATGGCACAA-3′
Pttg1F: 5′-TGGAGACAGTTGTTTGGGTGC-3′60270
R: 5′-GCTGCCTGGCTCTTCGTTAT-3′
PtpruF: 5′-ACCCTGAGCGAGAACGACA-3′60285
R: 5′-GGGATGGCTGAATAGCAAGAT-3′

To validate the mRNA expression profiling, five genes (Igf1, cdkn1c, Espl1, Pttg1, and Ptpru) were selected to performed real time-PCR. Primer sequences of the GAPDH gene and the genes selected were listed in Table 1. Igf1: Insulin-like growth factor-1; cdkn1c: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C; Espl1: extra spindle pole bodies homolog 1, Pttg1: pituitary tumor-transforming 1; Ptpru: protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, U.

2.5. miRNA Microarray Analysis
2.5.1. miRNA Expression Profiling

Evidence showed the important functions of miRNAs in stem cell regulation [20, 21]. Specific miRNAs modulate the functions of many types of stem cells, including neural stem/progenitor cells [22, 23]. In the present study, the miRNA expression profiling was analyzed to understand the effect of BSSG on regulation of miRNA, describing the correlation of miRNA and mRNA. In brief, total RNA (obtained from the same samples as mentioned in mRNA microarray analysis) was harvested using TRIZOL (Invitrogen) and miRNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the total RNA was measured using NanoDrop 1000, the samples were labeled using the miRCURY Hy3/Hy5 power labeling kit and hybridized in miRCURY LNA Array (v.18.0). Following the washing steps, the slides were scanned by the Agilent Scanner G2505C.

The scanned images were imported into GenePix Pro 6.0 software (Axon) for grid alignment and data extraction. The replicated miRNAs were averaged and the miRNAs with intensities ≥30 in all of the samples were chosen to calculate the normalization factor. The expressed data were normalized by median normalization. After normalization, significantly and differentially expressed miRNAs were identified by volcano plot filtering.

2.5.2. Real-Time PCR Validation for miRNA Expression Profiling

Real-time PCR was performed to validate the differential miRNA expression profiling obtained. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using AMV reverse transcriptase (Epicentre), RNase (Epicentre), dNTP (HyTest Ltd), RT buffer, and RT primers (Invitrogen). The mixture was incubated at 16°C for 30 min, 42°C for 40 min, and 85°C for 5 min to generate a library of miRNA cDNAs. U6 is used as an internal control for normalization. Real-time PCR was subsequently performed using an ABI PRISM7900 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to a standardized protocol. The reactions were incubated at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at an interval of 10 s at 95°C and an interval of 1 min at 60°C. Data were analyzed by . The primer sequences of the internal control gene and the target genes are listed in Tables 2 and 3.


GenesRT primer sequence

U65′-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3′
rno-miR-129-5p5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACGCAAGCC-3′
rno-miR-322-5p5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTCCAAAA-3′
rno-miR-301a-3p5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACGCTTTG-3′

To validate the miRNA expression profiling, three genes were selected to performed real time-PCR. RT primer sequences of the U6 gene used as reference and the genes selected were listed in Table 2.

GenesPrimer sequenceAnnealing temperature (°C)Product length (bp)

U6F: 5′GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT3′6089
R: 5′CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT3′
rno-miR-129-5pGSP: 5′GGAACTTTTTGCGGTCTGG3′6063
R: 5′GTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCG3′
rno-miR-322-5pGSP: 5′GGGCAGCAGCAATTCAT3′6065
R: 5′CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAG3′
rno-miR-301a-3pGSP: 5′CCCCGTGCAATAGTATTGT3′6065
R: 5′CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGT3′

Primer sequences of the internal control gene and the target genes for PCR were listed in Table 3. GSP is the specific primer for the corresponding miRNA and R is the matching primer for the corresponding RT Primer.
2.6. IGF1 Protein Determination

IGF1 protein determination were performed to investigate the key regulator by which BSSG promotes NSC proliferation. The cells were cultured in 24-well plates at a cell density of 5 × 104 cells per well and divided into four groups: a control group and BSSG-treated groups (10, 20, and 40 μM). Each group was designed to establish six double-pore treatments. The cells were treated for 72 h as described above. The supernatant was collected and processed using the Quantikine rat IGF1 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The absorbance of each well was determined using a microplate reader (EL×800, BioTek instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) set at 450 nm; the readings at 570 nm were subtracted from the readings at 450 nm. The quantity of cells in each well was counted using a cell counting plate. IGF1 levels were reported in pg/10,000 cells.

2.7. PPP Inhibition Test

IGF1 is mediated by type 1 IGF receptor (IGF1R). PPP is an inhibitor of IGF1R [24]. The inhibitory effect of PPP on IGF1R did not coinhibit the insulin receptor (IR) or compete with ATP in vitro kinase assays, suggesting that PPP may inhibit IGF1R autophosphorylation at the substrate level [25]. If PPP prevents BSSG-induced NSC proliferation, then the function of BSSG depends on IGF1.

In the study, PPP (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) stock solutions were prepared in DMSO and stored at 4°C. Before each experiment was performed, these solutions were diluted in a fresh medium to obtain a final DMSO concentration of <0.1%. The cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a cell density of 1 × 104 cells per well and divided among the PPP-BSSG treated groups (pair-wise; with PPP doses of 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 2 μM and BSSG doses of 0, 10, 20, and 40 μM). Each group was designed to establish four double-pore experiments. The cells were treated for 72 h, and CCK-8 assay was performed. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm to determine cell viability as a percentage.

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed by use of SPSS version 16.0 software program for windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Multiple comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni posttest. All data are presented as Mean ± SD, and statistical significance was accepted at the 5% level.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of NSCs

NSCs were positive for nestin (Figure 1).

3.2. Dose-Dependent Cell Proliferation Detection

BSSG significantly increased NSC proliferation at concentration of 40 μM ( ). The same result was observed at 5, 10, and 20 μM BSSG ( , Figure 2).

3.3. Comparison of NSC Proliferation Promoted by BSSG, BFGF, and EGF

NSCs proliferation was induced by adding bFGF (20 ng/mL; ), EGF (20 ng/mL; ), and BSSG at different concentrations (10 and 20 μM, ; 40 μM, ). The effect of BSSG on NSC proliferation at 40 μM was similar to those of bFGF and EGF (Figure 3).

3.4. mRNA Expression Profiling

The result of mRNA expression microarray analysis showed that 960 genes were differentially expressed after NSCs were treated with BSSG, including 333 upregulation genes (fold change ≥2) and 627 downregulation genes (fold change ≤0.5). The differential expression genes were described using GO term analysis (biological process). The main differentially expressed genes are listed in Tables 4 and 5.


GO ID Term valueGenes

GO:0000087M phase of the cell cycle AURKB; CCNF; KIF2C; BUB1B; CDCA3; IGF1; CENPF; DLGAP5; CDC20; SPAG5; MAD2L1; TRAF4AF1; NUSAP1; ESPL1; CCNB1; PLK1; PTTG1
GO:0000278Mitotic cell cycle SPAG5; MAD2L1; TRAF4AF1; NUSAP1; ESPL1; CDKN1B; CENPF; DLGAP5; CENPA; NDC80; CCNB1; PTTG1; CDC20; AURKB; CCNF;
GO:0000280Nuclear division SPAG5; MAD2L1; TRAF4AF1; NUSAP1; ESPL1; CCNB1; PLK1; PTTG1; CDC20; AURKB; CCNF; KIF2C; BUB1B; CDCA3; IGF1
GO:0007059Chromosome segregation SPAG5; MAD2L1; TRAF4AF1; NUSAP1; ESPL1; CCNB1; NDC80; PTTG1; CENPF; KIF2C; TOP2A
GO:0048285Organelle fission SPAG5; MAD2L1; TRAF4AF1; NUSAP1; ESPL1; CCNB1; CDCA3; PLK1; PTTG1; CDC20; AURKB; CCNF; KIF2C; BUB1B; IGF1
GO:0000226Microtubule cytoskeleton organization CENPA; NDC80; ESPL1; PLK1; KIF20A; KIF2C; SPAG5; TEKT1;
TRAF4AF1; CCNF; TACC3; CDKN1B; NUSAP1; CCNB1; AURKB
GO:0048545Response to steroid hormone stimulus CAR9; GBA; A2M; HP; IGF1; ADM; and so forth, a total of 22 genes
GO:0051301Cell division NUSAP1; PLK1; AURKB; KIF20A; NUMBL; TOP2A; TXNIP; CCNB2; CCNB1; PTTG1; CDC20; CCNF; KIF2C; BUB1B; CDCA3; TRAF4AF1
GO:0008283Cell proliferation CDC20; AURKB; CCNB1; PTTG1; IGF1; and so forth, a total of 39 genes
GO:0019932Second messenger-mediated signaling CALCA; ADORA2A; GRM3; EDNRB; GRM5; CXCR4; TOX3; RASD1; ADM; PDE7B; CDH13; IGF1; LMCD1; MT1A
GO:0009605Response to external stimulus A2M; LBP; CCNB1; ENPP2; CKLF; IGF1; and so forth, a total of 35 genes
GO:0009719Response to endogenous stimulus ADORA2A; IGF1; SPP1; A2M; and so forth, a total of 32 genes
GO:0008608Attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores CCNB1; SPAG5; TRAF4AF1; NDC80
GO:0009056Catabolism TOP2A; FBXO32; MANBA; IGF1; CDC20; and so forth, totle 41 genes
GO:0007051Spindle organization ESPL1; NDC80; TACC3; CCNB1; AURKB; SPAG5; TRAF4AF1
GO:0051313Attachment of spindle microtubules to chromosomes NDC80; CCNB1; SPAG5; TRAF4AF1
GO:0009725Response to hormone stimulus IGF1; LOX; SPP1; A2M; HP; ALPL; and so forth, a total of 27 genes
GO:0010941Regulation of cell death AURKB; IGF1; ADORA2A; and so forth, a total of 32 genes
GO:0043470Regulation of carbohydrate catabolism PFKFB3; DDIT4; IER3; IGF1
GO:0048016Inositol phosphate-mediated signaling EDNRB; GRM5; CALCA; IGF1; LMCD1

Upregulation genes obtained from the mRNA expression profiling were listed in Table 4. The upregulation genes were mostly involved in the mitotic cell cycle, enhancing cell proliferation. value, the significance testing value of the GO ID, results from the top GO of a bioconductor.

GO IDTerm valueGenes

GO:0030154Cell differentiation FOXC2; IGF2; JAG1; SEMA3C; HMGA2; and so forth, a total of 38 genes
GO:0006950Response to stress PENK; BDNF; CRYAB; TRH; PLAU; MMP3; and so forth, a total of 32 genes
GO:2000736Regulation of stem cell differentiation HMGA2; JAG1; HES1
GO:0032103Positive regulation of response to external stimulus NPY; IL1RL1; SCG2; TNFSF11; CD74; THBS4
GO:0048710Regulation of astrocyte differentiation HES1; CLCF1; HMGA2
GO:0045597Positive regulation of cell differentiation TGFB1I1; CD74; FRZB; JAG1; BDNF; MAP1B; IFI204; TNFSF11; TNFRSF12A; HES1; CLCF1
GO:0048584Positive regulation of response to stimulus CD74; TNFSF11; TGFB1I1; CDKN1C; GPC3; HES1; NPY; CLCF1; IGF2; JAG1; PRRX2; IL1RL1; SCG2; THBS4; HMGA2; TNFRSF12A
GO:0000904Cell morphogenesis involved in differentiation HMGA2; MAP1B; BDNF; TGFB1I1; CHST3; FOXC2; TNFRSF12A; HES1; XYLT1; NPTX1
GO:0050920Regulation of chemotaxis SCG2; CD74; THBS4; EFNB2
GO:0030182Neuron differentiation MAP1B; BDNF; CHST3; NPY; MFRP; JAG1; HES1; CDKN1C; TNFRSF12A; HCN1; XYLT1; THBS4; NPTX1; BYSL
GO:0060326Cell chemotaxis TNFSF11; SCG2; CD74; THBS4
GO:0090398Cellular senescence HMGA2; RGD1305645
GO:0016477Cell migration SEMA3C; EFNB2; TNFSF11; TNFRSF12A; PLAU; MMP3; UNC5C; SCG2; THBS4; CD74; HES1
GO:0016126Sterol biosynthesis HMGCS2; HSD17B7
GO:0033554Cellular response to stress HMGA2; TNFSF11; MAP1B; CHST3; XYLT1; DHX9

Downregulation genes obtained from the mRNA expression profiling were listed in Table 5. The downregulation genes were mostly involved in differentiation and the regulation of differentiation, indicating that cell differentiation was inhibited, and accordingly, more possibility of cell proliferation was afforded. value, the significance testing value of the GO ID, results from the top GO of a bioconductor.

Tables 4 and 5 revealed that the majority of upregulation genes were involved in mitotic cell cycle particularly in the M phase, enhancing cell proliferation. By contrast, the majority of the downregulation genes were involved in cell differentiation, indicating that cell differentiation was inhibited, and accordingly, more possibility of cell proliferation was afforded.

3.5. Genic Network Analysis

The genic network consists of the majority of the upregulation and downregulation genes (Figure 4(a)). The “hubs” of the gene nodes in the genic network include Bub1b (budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog, beta), Cdc20 (cell division cycle 20 homolog), Plk1 (polo-like kinase 1), Spp1 (Sialoprotein/osteopontin), IGF1 (insulin-like growth factor I), Aurkb (aurora kinase B), and Ndc80 (kinetochore associated 2) based on the results of connectivity analysis (Figure 4(b)). BSSG increased the expression of the hub genes, which are mostly involved in cell cycle (the functions of these genes see Genecards, http://www.genecards.org/), thereby enhancing NSC proliferation.

3.6. Real-Time PCR Validation for mRNA Expression Profiling

The mRNA expression profiling was validated by real-time PCR. The comparison of quantified mRNA expressions obtained using real-time PCR and microarray analysis was performed to determine the reliability of microarray analysis (Table 6). Table 6 showed that the fold changes (test versus control) of microarray analysis were almost similar to those of PCR; an increase or a decrease in gene expression quantified by microarray analysis was consistent with the result of PCR. This result indicated that the result of the microarray analysis was reliable.


GenesPCRMicroarray analysisFold change (test versus control)
ControlTestControlTestPCRMicroarray analysis

IGF1 3.20 ↑4.75 ↑
Pttg1 2.09 ↑2.91 ↑
Adora2a 2.34 ↑2.62 ↑
Espl1 3.41 ↑2.07 ↑
Ptpru 2.74 ↑2.46 ↑
cdkn1c 0.30 0.47

3.7. miRNA Expression Profiling

A total of 30 upregulated miRNAs (test versus control, fold change ≥2) and 84 downregulated miRNAs (test versus control, fold change ≤0.5) were obtained after the NSCs were treated with BSSG (Figure 5).

3.8. Real-Time PCR Validation for miRNA Microarray Analysis

The miRNA expression profiling was validated by real-time PCR. The comparison of quantified miRNA expressions obtained using real-time PCR and microarray analysis was performed to determine the reliability of microarray analysis (Table 7). Table 7 showed that the fold changes (test versus control) obtained by microarray analysis were almost similar to those obtained by PCR. An increase or a decrease in gene expression quantified by microarray analysis was consistent with the result of PCR. This result indicated that the result of microarray analysis was reliable.


miRNAPCRMicroarray analysisFold change (test versus control)
ControlTestControlTestPCRMicroarray analysis

rno-miR-129-5p 0.29 0.36
rno-miR-301a-3p 0.33 0.31
rno-miR-322-5p 0.34 0.37

3.9. miRNA-mRNA Correlation Analysis

miRNAs are recognized as a powerful tool used to regulate gene expression via the RNA interference pathway [14, 15]. Thus, miRNA-mRNA correlation analysis was carried out to further understand the effect of BSSG on regulating NSCs genes. Five downregulated miRNAs, miR-322-5p, miR-301a-3p, miR-129-5p, miR-322-3p, and miR-129-2-3p, of which the target mRNAs are involved in regulation of cell proliferation (based on miRWalk database http://www.ma.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk/ and DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp), were selected to perform correlation analysis. The interactions between the five miRNAs and predicted target mRNAs (included in the differential expression genes obtained by the mRNA microarray analysis) were visualized as a network (Figure 6). The network was generated by use of cytoscape (with a fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5, ), miRanda target prediction, and negative-correlation filtering, revealing that numerous mRNAs including IGF1 mRNA were negatively regulated by the five miRNAs, which were downregulated, thereby increasing the expression of the corresponding mRNA.

3.10. IGF1 Protein Quantitation

IGF1 protein in the cell culture supernatant was quantified. IGF1 protein levels were remarkably increased after the NSCs were treated with BSSG at 20 and 40 μM ( , Figure 7).

3.11. PPP Inhibition Test

PPP inhibited the BSSG-induced cell proliferation at suitable concentrations (Figure 8). The inhibition of PPP on NSC proliferation was weak at 0.01 μM; however, the inhibition was remarkable at 0.1 μM ( ) as well as 1 ( ) and 2 μM ( ). Analogously, the inhibition of PPP on BSSG-induced cell proliferation was weak at 0.01 μM. By contrast, BSSG-induced cell proliferation was inhibited when the cells were exposed to PPP ≥ 0.1 μM. This result showed that if the function of IGF1 was blocked up, then the cell proliferation induced by BSSG ceased to exist.

4. Discussion

NSC proliferation is necessary to facilitate neurogenesis [26, 27]. Neurogenesis is enhanced when NSC proliferation is promoted appropriately. The present study provided an efficient alternative substance BSSG, which is inexpensive and chemically stable (BSSG powder remains stable at room temperature for a maximum of two years).

BSSG is present in many higher plants [28]. The procedure of isolation of BSSG is simple [29]. Moreover, it had been synthetically prepared since 1913 [30]; therefore, BSSG can be easily obtained. In the study, the minimal effective concentration was 5 μM, and the effectiveness of BSSG was similar to that of bFGF (20 ng/mL) and EGF (20 ng/mL) at concentrations of 40 μM, revealing the excellent proliferation-promoting activity.

The proliferation-promoting activity of BSSG is the result of regulation of numerous genes. mRNA expression profiling revealed that the majority of upregulation genes were involved in mitotic cell cycle particularly in the M phase, enhancing cell proliferation. By contrast, the majority of the downregulated expression genes were involved in cell differentiation, indicating that cell differentiation was inhibited and accordingly, more possibility of cell proliferation was afforded. Among the differential expression genes, the “hubs” of the gene nodes were Bub1b, Cdc20, Plk1, Spp1, Aurkb, IGF1, and Ndc80, all of which were upregulated. Most of these “hub” genes are necessary to complete a cell cycle according to Genecards (http://www.genecards.org/), of which the importance is self-evident. However, the primary regulatory gene that induces the cells to enter the cell cycle or accelerate the course of the cell cycle is more substantial to cell proliferation. IGF1 is the key regulatory gene in these “hub” genes, since it exhibits a notable growth-promoting activity.

IGF1 gene encodes a protein with functions and structure similar to insulin, but IGF1 exhibits a higher growth-promoting activity. Experimental evidence demonstrates that IGF1 functions in CNS development by promoting neural cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation, in which IGF1 likely functions in a paracrine or autocrine fashion [31]. In vivo activities of IGF1, including the stimulation of NSC and progenitor cell proliferation during embryonic and early postnatal development, have been examined [32]. Moreover, endogenous IGF1 serves an important role in dentate granule cell survival during the course of postnatal brain development [33]. Also, IGF1 is an endogenous mediator of focal ischemia-induced neural progenitor proliferation [34]. BSSG increases the expression of endogenous IGF1 with even more biological activities, since IGF1 plays important role in growth and development of NSCs.

BSSG increased the expression of endogenous IGF1 as showed in mRNA expression microarray analysis, miRNA-mRNA correlation analysis and IGF1 Protein Quantitation. In particular, IGF1 mRNA was negatively regulated by miRNAs (miR-129-5p, miR-301a-3p, and miR-322-5p), which were downregulated after NSCs were treated with BSSG. In other words, the expression of IGF1 mRNA was increased. And as a result, the IGF1 protein level was increased. Emerging evidence supported the close relationship between the abilities of BSSG and IGF1 to promote cell proliferation. PPP inhibition test confirmed that the function of BSSG depended on IGF1, in which the function was inhibited when the cells were exposed to suitable doses of PPP.

The present study provided information about BSSG, an inexpensive and stable compound, which could promote NSC proliferation. BSSG could be potentially developed as a growth factor alternative that could be used in clinical medicine and research applications.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program 2011CB707501), the Key Project of Science and Technology of Guangzhou (11BppZXaa2070006), and the Sixth Batch of projects of Jiangsu Province Six Talent Peak of China and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, PAPD (TCM combined with western medicine).

References

  1. B. A. Reynolds, W. Tetzlaff, and S. Weiss, “A multipotent EGF-responsive striatal embryonic progenitor cell produces neurons and astrocytes,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 4565–4574, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  2. B. A. Reynolds and S. Weiss, “Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system,” Science, vol. 255, no. 5052, pp. 1707–1710, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. Miltiadous, G. Kouroupi, A. Stamatakis et al., “Subventricular zone-derived neural stem cell grafts protect against hippocampal degeneration and restore cognitive function in the mouse following intrahippocampal kainic Acid administration,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 185–198, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  4. H. Ma, B. Yu, L. Kong, Y. Zhang, and Y. Shi, “Neural stem cells over-expressing brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) stimulate synaptic protein expression and promote functional recovery following transplantation in rat model of traumatic brain injury,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 69–83, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Li, H. Su, Q. L. Fu et al., “Soluble NgR fusion protein modulates the proliferation of neural progenitor cells via the notch pathway,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2363–2372, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Chen, X. Huang, W. Chen, N. Wang, and L. Li, “Tenuigenin promotes proliferation and differentiation of hippocampal neural stem cells,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 771–777, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. W. C. Wong and L. Guillaud, “The role of epidermal growth factor and its receptors in mammalian CNS,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 15, no. 2-3, pp. 147–156, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. I. Mason, “Initiation to end point: the multiple roles of fibroblast growth factors in neural development,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 583–596, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. J. D. Bouic, S. Etsebeth, R. W. Liebenberg, C. F. Albrecht, K. Pegel, and P. P. Van Jaarsveld, “Beta-sitosterol and beta-sitosterol glucoside stimulate human peripheral blood lymphocyte proliferation: implications for their use as an immunomodulatory vitamin combination,” International Journal of Immunopharmacology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 693–700, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. N. Choi, Y. H. Choi, J. M. Lee et al., “Anti-inflammatory effects of β-sitosterol-β-D-glucoside from Trachelospermum jasminoides (Apocynaceae) in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages,” Natural Product Research, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 2340–2343, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Deepak, G. Dipankar, D. Prashanth, M. K. Asha, A. Amit, and B. V. Venkataraman, “Tribulosin and β-sitosterol-D-glucoside, the anthelmintic principles of Tribulus terrestris,” Phytomedicine, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 753–756, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. J. D. Bouic and J. H. Lamprecht, “Plant sterols and sterolins: a review of their immune-modulating properties,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 170–177, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J.H. Lee, J. Y. Lee, J. H. Park et al., “Immunoregulatory activity by daucosterol, a β-sitosterol glycoside, induces protective Th1 immune response against disseminated Candidiasis in mice,” Vaccine, vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 3834–3840, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. V. Ambros, “The functions of animal microRNAs,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7006, pp. 350–355, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. P. Bartel, “MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function,” Cell, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 281–297, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. P. Lim, N. C. Lau, P. Garrett-Engele et al., “Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of-target mRNAs,” Nature, vol. 433, no. 7027, pp. 769–773, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake et al., “Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Guo, Y. Zeng, Y. Liang, L. Wang, H. Su, and W. Wu, “Cyclosporine affects the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells in culture,” NeuroReport, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 863–868, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. Azuaje, Y. Devaux, and D. R. Wagner, “Coordinated modular functionality and prognostic potential of a heart failure biomarker-driven interaction network,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 4, pp. 60–78, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. Liu and X. Zhao, “MicroRNAs in adult and embryonic neurogenesis,” Neuromolecular Medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 141–152, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  21. Q. Shen and S. Temple, “Fine control: microRNA regulation of adult neurogenesis,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 369–370, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. C. Cheng, E. Pastrana, M. Tavazoie, and F. Doetsch, “MiR-124 regulates adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone stem cell niche,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 399–408, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Zhao, G. Sun, S. Li, and Y. Shi, “A feedback regulatory loop involving microRNA-9 and nuclear receptor TLX in neural stem cell fate determination,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 365–371, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Girnita, L. Girnita, F. del Prete, A. Bartolazzi, O. Larsson, and M. Axelson, “Cyclolignans as inhibitors of the isulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and malignant cell growth,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 236–242, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Vasilcanu, A. Girnita, L. Girnita, R. Vasilcanu, M. Axelson, and O. Larsson, “The cyclolignan PPP induces activation loop-specific inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor link to the phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase/Akt apoptotic pathway,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 47, pp. 7854–7862, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Iwai, K. Sato, N. Omori et al., “Three steps of neural stem cells development in gerbil dentate gyrus after transient ischemia,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 411–419, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Iwai, K. Sato, H. Kamada et al., “Temporal profile of stem cell division, migration, and differentiation from subventricular zone to olfactory bulb after transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 331–341, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  28. “Monograph. Plant sterols and sterolins,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 203–206, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  29. F. Aylward and B. W. Nichols, “Isolation of β-sitosterol-D-glucoside from groundnut phospholipids,” Nature, vol. 181, no. 4615, article 1064, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. H. Salway, “The synthetical preparation of the d-glucosides of sitosterol, cholesterol, and some fatty alcohols,” Journal of the Chemical Society, vol. 103, pp. 1022–1029, 1913. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. J. D'Ercole, P. Ye, and A. S. Calikoglu, “The role of the insulin-like growth factors in the central nervous system,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 227–255, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  32. G. J. Popken, R. D. Hodge, P. Ye et al., “In vivo effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on prenatal and early postnatal development of the central nervous system,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2056–2068, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. M. Cheng, M. Cohen, V. Tseng, and C. A. Bondy, “Endogenous IGF1 enhances cell survival in the postnatal dentate gyrus,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 341–347, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y. P. Yan, K. A. Sailor, R. Vemuganti, and R. J. Dempsey, “Insulin-like growth factor-1 is an endogenous mediator of focal ischemia-induced neural progenitor proliferation,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Li-hua Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views2024
Downloads808
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.