Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 431614, 7 pages
Research Article

Surface Passivation and Antireflection Behavior of ALD on n-Type Silicon for Solar Cells

1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97401, Taiwan
2Department of Electro-Optical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan 710, Taiwan
3Institute of Photonic System, National Chiao Tung University, Tainan 71150, Taiwan

Received 16 September 2013; Accepted 30 October 2013

Academic Editor: Jimmy Yu

Copyright © 2013 Ing-Song Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Atomic layer deposition, a method of excellent step coverage and conformal deposition, was used to deposit TiO2 thin films for the surface passivation and antireflection coating of silicon solar cells. TiO2 thin films deposited at different temperatures (200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C) on FZ n-type silicon wafers are in the thickness of 66.4 nm ± 1.1 nm and in the form of self-limiting growth. For the properties of surface passivation, Si surface is effectively passivated by the 200°C deposition TiO2 thin film. Its effective minority carrier lifetime, measured by the photoconductance decay method, is improved 133% at the injection level of  cm−3. Depending on different deposition parameters and annealing processes, we can control the crystallinity of TiO2 and find low-temperature TiO2 phase (anatase) better passivation performance than the high-temperature one (rutile), which is consistent with the results of work function measured by Kelvin probe. In addition, TiO2 thin films on polished Si wafer serve as good ARC layers with refractive index between 2.13 and 2.44 at 632.8 nm. Weighted average reflectance at AM1.5G reduces more than half after the deposition of TiO2. Finally, surface passivation and antireflection properties of TiO2 are stable after the cofire process of conventional crystalline Si solar cells.

1. Introduction

Most commercially available solar cells are from silicon, and p-type crystalline silicon solar cells are the mainstream now. In order to increase the efficiency of crystalline silicon solar cells, people in industry try to find the better integration processes of conventional solar cells, to improve the quality of materials, and to cost down the fabrication. Besides, new structures of silicon solar cells with higher efficiency are studied. Passivated emitter and rear, locally diffused cell (PERL), proposed by University of New South Wales, Australia, in 1994, is also one of the designs, which performs very high efficiency up to 25% [1]. In industry, the conversion efficiency of 6 inch × 6 inch p-type crystalline silicon solar cells can be over 20% using the surface passivation technology with Al2O3 thin films [2]. Unfortunately, the light induced degradation (LID) makes p-type crystalline silicon solar cells drop around 1% efficiency due to the formation of boron-oxygen clusters after light exposure [3]. Therefore, PERL with n-type silicon wafers attracts researchers’ great attention recently and will dominate the crystalline Si solar cell in the near future [4, 5].

For the surface passivation and antireflection coating of p-type Si solar cells, amorphous films deposed by the technique of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) were well developed in the early 1990s. thin films can reduce surface recombination and light reflection and additionally provide very efficient passivation for bulk defects of low cost Si materials [6, 7]. However, for the p-type diffused surface of n-type Si solar cells, dielectric coatings are not suitable for passivation, because its positive charge will decrease the properties of surface passivation. Thermal silicon oxide could be good for passivation initially, but the Si-SiO2 interface on boron-diffused and un-diffused surfaces degrades slowly over three months at room temperature [8, 9]. Besides, amorphous silicon (a-Si) and Al2O3 are good passivation layers but are not suitable for ARC on the front surface of solar cells. Therefore, titanium oxide (TiO2) reattracts researchers’ attentions, which has been used in the photovoltaic industry as an antireflection coating for many years since the 1980s due to its low growth temperature, a nontoxic and noncorrosive liquid precursor, excellent chemical resistance, an optimal reflective index, and low absorbance at wavelengths relevant to silicon solar cells. Surface passivation properties of spray pyrolysis TiO2 on silicon wafer were enhanced by the formation of a SiO2 layer at TiO2/Si interface after being annealed at 950°C without degradation [10, 11]. Nonstoichiometric films grown by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) had some degree of passivation for nondiffused p-type Si surface through the substrate placed at the edge of plasma [12]. Recently, Thomson et al. proposed that the TiO2 thin films deposited by atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD) can effectively passivate n-type silicon and Boron-diffused surfaces as better as the passivation performance of SiO2. These films were annealed at 300°C in N2 ambient and light soaked by halogen lamp to create negative charges for better surface passivation [8].

Many technologies can be employed to grow TiO2 thin films, such as PECVD, APCVD, PLD, spray pyrolysis, reactive sputtering, and sol-gel [13]. In this paper, we grew TiO2 thin films on Si wafers by atomic layer deposition (ALD) which performs excellent uniformity, accurate thickness control, and almost 100% step coverage on substrate surface [14]. Some characterization of TiO2 thin films by ALD will be shown. An investigation of the surface passivation and antireflection coating on silicon relative to the growth temperatures of ALD will be discussed. The degradation and influence of cofire process for the metallization of Si solar cells will also be studied. This work is essential for the applications of ALD TiO2 thin films in n-type crystalline silicon solar cells.

2. Experiment

In the experiment, we used n-type double-polished FZ silicon wafers with resistivity 1000 Ω-cm, thickness 500 μm, and orientation (100). Before the deposition of TiO2, the cleanness of Si wafers was conducted by acetone to remove the organics and 5% hydrofluoric acid to remove the native oxide. Then, wafer was rinsed in deionized water and dried with N2 gas. Right after the cleaning, Si substrate was placed in the reaction chamber of our ALD system which is shown in Figure 1. Until the base pressure of chamber reached 2 × 10−2  torr, we set the deposition temperature as 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, respectively. For the deposition process of TiO2 thin films, we employed TiCl4 and H2O as reactants and Ar (99.999%) as purging gas. The injection volume of TiCl4 and H2O was 0.10 cc and 0.06 cc, respectively, for each step according to the ideal gas law. One cycle of a monolayer deposition included eight steps (TiCl4 reactant, pump-down, Ar purge, pump-down, H2O reactant, pump-down, Ar purge, and pump-down), and it took eight seconds. After 1000-cycle deposition and cool-down to room temperature of the chamber, n-type FZ Si wafer with double-side TiO2 coating was done for further analysis [15]. First, the characterization of TiO2 films was made by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Second, the study of surface passivation for ALD TiO2 on n-type FZ silicon wafers was carried out by Sinton’s quasi-steady-state photoconductance (QSSPC) method and Kelvin probe for work function measurement [16, 17]. Finally, optical properties of TiO2 thin films were decided by the spectroscopic ellipsometry measurement and reflection spectroscopy in the wavelength range of 300 nm–1200 nm.

Figure 1: Schematic of the ALD system.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. The Characterization of ALD TiO2 Thin Films

The surface morphology and cross-section of our TiO2 thin films were observed by a JSM-6700F SEM with accelerating voltage 10 kV. In Figure 2, SEM images of TiO2 thin films deposited at different temperatures show that these films are polycrystalline and have grain sizes in the range of 45 nm and 110 nm. Cross-section SEM images, in the inset of Figure 3, were used to decide the thickness of TiO2 thin films. The thickness of TiO2 thin films is 66.4 nm ± 1.1 nm for all growth temperatures shown in Figure 3. Here, we can find that the growth rate is independent of the substrate’s temperature, which indicates that the reaction is self-limited by the saturated surface adsorption of reactants. The adsorption thickness, 0.066 nm, is almost the same for each cycle of ALD process. Our ALD system demonstrates very large growth windows for the TiO2 thin films deposited on Si wafers.

Figure 2: SEM images of TiO2 thin films at different growth temperatures: (a) 200°C, (b) 300°C, (c) 400°C, and (d) 500°C.
Figure 3: ALD TiO2 growth rate at temperature 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C is 0.066 nm per cycle due to self-limiting growth. Inset is the cross-section SEM image.

The crystallinity of ALD TiO2 thin films at different temperatures was studied by Bruker X-ray diffractometry. In Figure 4, XRD patterns demonstrate that TiO2 thin films deposited at low temperatures are primarily with anatase phase. As the deposition temperature increased up to 500°C, rutile phase began to be obtained in TiO2 thin films. When the TiO2 films are annealed with the parameter of 900°C, 60 seconds, and O2 ambient, rutile phase dominated in the films. Rapid thermal annealing (RTA) induces phase transformation of TiO2 films from low-temperature anatase phase to high-temperature rutile phase. The higher RTA temperature is, the more rutile phase we observe. From this work, we can control the phase of TiO2 thin films for the following studies of surface passivation and antireflection coating on n-type Si.

Figure 4: XRD patterns of TiO2 thin films deposited at 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, 500°C, and RTA 900°C.

In addition, grain size of ALD TiO2 can be estimated by SEM images and Scherrer equation of XRD, which is summarized in Table 1. We get smaller grain size by XRD than the one by SEM, but their trends are the same at different deposition temperatures. For TiO2 films only with anatase phase (at deposition temperatures 200°C, 300°C, and 400°C), the lower deposition temperature we set, the larger grain size we observe. According to the growth mechanism of TiO2 thin films, higher-temperature deposition results in significant grain refinement, due to an increased density of sites for nucleation of crystallization [18]. As the deposition temperature increases up to 500°C, we find the phase transformation to rutile and the effect of grain growth, which could influence the surface passivation of TiO2 thin film on n-type Si.

Table 1: Estimation of grain size of TiO2 thin films by SEM and XRD.
3.2. Surface Passivation Properties of ALD TiO2

Sinton’s WCT-120, a photoconductance decay method, was employed to measure the effective minority carrier lifetime of samples. The effective lifetime () is a combination of bulk lifetime () and surface lifetime () as follows: whereis the sample thickness andis surface recombination velocity. In order to study the surface passivation of ALD TiO2 thin films, we used FZ n-type Si substrate which has very large bulk lifetime. Therefore, the effective lifetime measured is close to surface lifetime to calculate the surface recombination velocity. Figure 5 shows the effective lifetime as function of minority carrier density by WCT-120. The effective lifetime without ALD TiO2 passivation is 9.2 μs at the injection level of 1 × 1015 cm−3 ( cm/s). After the deposition of TiO2 at 200°C, the effective lifetime is 21.5 μs at the injection level of 1 × 1015 cm−3 ( cm/s). Si surface is effectively passivated by the ALD TiO2 thin films, especially for the one deposited at the low temperature. At the deposition temperature 500°C, when rutile phase can be observed, the degree of surface passivation does not exist anymore. For the samples with RTA 900°C, their effective lifetimes are very low (not shown). From the results of the effective lifetime measurement, we can find that TiO2 thin film deposited at 200°C has the best performance for surface passivation on n-type Si.

Figure 5: Effective minority carrier lifetime as function of carrier density at different deposition temperatures and their lifetime values at injection level 1 × 1015 cm−3.

Moreover, we study the degradation and influence of metallization process in crystalline solar cells. In Figure 6, the effective lifetime of 30 nm TiO2 thin film grown at temperature 200°C slightly increased after five months of deposition. After cofire process of belt-type furnace at peak temperature 800°C, the effective lifetime decreased a little but is still good enough for surface passivation. We can summarize that ALD TiO2 thin films have high stability for the applications in crystalline silicon solar cells.

Figure 6: Effective minority carrier lifetime of 30 nm TiO2 thin films deposited at 200°C in three cases: after deposition, five months, and cofire.

In the study of solar cells, work function is sensitive to the voltage across the barrier of p-n junction and the surface traps in the passivation emitter interface. In this work, nonscanning ambient Kelvin probe, KP 020, was used to measure the work function of TiO2 thin films at different deposition temperatures. In Figure 7, the higher deposition temperature we use, the larger work function of TiO2 we measure, which is consistent with the result of effective lifetimes at different deposition temperatures. To explain this, we can see the energy band diagram of TiO2 and Si in Figure 8. TiO2/Si heterojunction makes energy band bending at the interface of TiO2 and n-type Si [19]. According to the work function of TiO2 thin films we measured, more band bending occurred in the case of TiO2 film deposited at 500°C, which induce more recombination at the interface and lower effective lifetime of samples.

Figure 7: Work function (■) and effective lifetime (▲) of TiO2 thin films at different deposition temperatures.
Figure 8: The left hand side is energy band diagrams of TiO2 and Si before contact. After contact, band bending occurs at the interface of TiO2 and Si.
3.3. Optical Properties of ALD TiO2

Now we will demonstrate that our ALD TiO2 thin films are an excellent antireflection coating layer for crystalline silicon solar cells. For the conventional quarter-wavelength antireflection coating (ARC), the refractive index of coating layer has to be chosen as , where is the refractive index of substrate, that is, Si in this case. For example, considering the refractive index of Si in the spectral ranges of 400 nm–800 nm [20], the refractive index of quarter-wavelength ARC thin films should be in the range of ~2.36–1.92. To verify this, we performed the spectroscopic ellipsometry measurements and extracted the refractive index of our ALD TiO2 thin films. Figure 9 shows the refractive index as function of wavelength for our TiO2 thin film deposited at temperature 200°C. Its refractive index decreases monotonically from 2.65 to 2.25 as wavelength decreases from 375 nm to 900 nm, showing a similar trend as anatase-phase bulk TiO2 [21] but having a little lower value of index, which probably is because of polycrystal structure in our films (see SEM images in Figure 2). Most importantly, the results show that our ALD TiO2 thin films are an excellent choice of quarter-wavelength ARC layer for Si solar cells.

Figure 9: Refractive index as function of wavelength for TiO2 thin film grown at 200°C.

To further prove this, we used Hitachi U-4100 to measure the reflectance spectra of our ALD TiO2 thin films and a Si wafer as a reference, shown in Figure 10. Firstly, all of TiO2 deposited Si wafers show a much lower reflectance than those of a bare Si wafer over the measured spectral range. Secondly, a minimum reflectance of TiO2 deposed Si wafers is observed at ~550 nm, which is consistent with the requirement of film thickness for quarter-wavelength ARC; that is, . Taking  nm and , we have  nm, which agrees with our SEM results. Again, this indicates that our TiO2 thin films serve as an ARC layer. Thirdly, the reflectance of all TiO2 deposited Si increases monotonically from ~550 nm to ~1000 nm. This is because the thickness (66.4 nm) of our TiO2 film deviates the further and further as wavelength increases. Fourthly, a bump rising at around 1000 nm is observed for all samples. This is because the reflectance from Si backside surface starts to contribute the measured reflectance as wavelength approaching the band gap wavelength of Si.

Figure 10: Reflectance of bare Si wafer and Si with TiO2 thin films grown at different temperatures as function of wavelength from 300 nm to 1200 nm.

To overall justify the ARC performance of our TiO2 thin films for solar cells, we calculate the weight average reflectance (WAR) at AM1.5G in the range of 300 nm to 1200 nm. The results show that all of our ALD TiO2 thin films have WAR (16.68%–18.92%) less than the half of WAR (38.36%) of bare Si. The TiO2 thin film grown at 200°C shows the lowest value of WAR because it has the lowest refractive index deduced from ellipsometry. A lower WAR value can be achieved with optimized growth conditions and film thickness. Moreover, the reflectance spectra as well as the WAR are almost the same after cofire process by belt-type furnace at peak temperature 800°C (not shown), which indicates that our ALD TiO2 thin films are suitable for the fabrication processes of crystalline silicon solar cells.

4. Conclusion

Growth window of self-limiting can be from 200°C to 500°C in our TiO2 ALD system with the growth rate 0.066 nm per cycle. All these films are excellent antireflection coating layers for Si. For lower deposition temperature of TiO2 thin films, we find smaller energy band bending in the interface of TiO2/Si and better surface passivation performance. The best surface passivation and antireflection coating on Si wafers are carried out at the deposition temperature 200°C, mainly anatase phase in TiO2 film. Once the rutile appears via high-temperature depositions or annealing processes, the degree of surface passivation will not exist. After the cofire process of conventional crystalline Si solar cells, we prove that their surface passivation and antireflection properties are very stable, which can be applied for n-type crystalline silicon solar cells.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 101-2218-E-259-001) for financially supporting this study and E-Ton Solar Tech. Co., Ltd., for the measurement of Sinton WCT-120 and Hitachi U-4100.


  1. M. A. Green, J. Zhao, and A. Wang, “23% module and other silicon solar cell advances,” in Proceedings of 2nd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, vol. 1187, 1998.
  2. F. Werner, B. Veith, V. Tiba et al., “Very low surface recombination velocities on p—and n-type c-Si by ultrafast spatial atomic layer deposition of aluminum oxide,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 97, no. 16, Article ID 162103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Bothe, R. Sinton, and J. Schmidt, “Fundamental boron-oxygen-related carrier lifetime limit in mono- and multicrystalline silicon,” Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 287–296, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Zhao and A. Wang, “Rear emitter n-type passivated emitter, rear totally diffused silicon solar cell Structure,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 24, Article ID 242102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. G. Lee, J. Skarp, V. Malinen, S. Li, S. Choi, and H. M. Branz, “Excellent passivation and low reflectivity Al2O3/TiO2 bilayer coating for n-wafer silicon solar cells,” in Proceedings of 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC '12), 2012.
  6. A. G. Aberle, “Surface passivation of crystalline silicon solar cells: a review,” Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 8, pp. 473–487, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  7. E. Fourmond, G. Dennler, R. Monna, M. Lemiti, A. Fave, and A. Laugier, “UVCVD silicon nitride passivation and ARC layers for multicrystalline solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 297–301, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. F. Thomson, S. Z. Lynn, and K. R. McIntosh, “Passivation of silicon by negatively charged TiO2,” in Proceedings of 25th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EUPVSEC '05), vol. 1146, 2010.
  9. A. F. Thomson and K. R. Mclntosh, “Degradation of oxide-passivated boron-diffused silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95, Article ID 052101, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. B. S. Richards, J. E. Cotter, and C. B. Honsberg, “Enhancing the surface passivation of TiO2 coated silicon wafers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1123–1125, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. S. Richards, “Single-material TiO2 double-layer antireflection coatings,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 369–390, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. M. Doeswijk, H. H. C. De Moor, D. H. A. Blank, and H. Rogalla, “Passivating TiO2 coatings for silicon solar cells by pulsed laser deposition,” Applied Physics A, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. S409–S411, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Vitanov, G. Agostinelli, A. Harizanova et al., “Low cost surface passivation for p-type mc-Si based on pseudobinary alloys (Al2O3)x(TiO2)1−x,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 15, pp. 2489–2495, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. M. George, “Atomic layer deposition: an overview,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 111–131, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H.-E. Cheng, C.-M. Hsu, and Y.-C. Chen, “Substrate materials and deposition temperature dependent growth characteristics and photocatalytic properties of ALD TiO2 films,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 156, no. 8, pp. D275–D278, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Cuevas and D. Macdonald, “Measuring and interpreting the lifetime of silicon wafers,” Solar Energy, vol. 76, no. 1–3, pp. 255–262, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Dirscherl, I. Baikie, G. Forsyth, and A. Van der Heide, “Utilisation of a micro-tip scanning Kelvin probe for non-invasive surface potential mapping of mc-Si solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 485–494, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. R. G. Mitchell, D. J. Attard, and G. Triani, “Transmission electron microscopy studies of atomic layer deposition TiO2 films grown on silicon,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 441, no. 1-2, pp. 85–95, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd edition, 1981.
  20. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, vol. 1, 1991.
  21. G. E. Jellison Jr., L. A. Boatner, J. D. Budai, B.-S. Jeong, and D. P. Norton, “Spectroscopic ellipsometry of thin film and bulk anatase (TiO2),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 9537–9541, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus