Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2018, Article ID 2503950, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2503950
Review Article

Wound Healing and Omega-6 Fatty Acids: From Inflammation to Repair

Laboratory of Nutrients and Tissue Repair, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Limeira, SP, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Hosana G. Rodrigues; rb.pmacinu.acf@seugirdor.anasoh

Received 4 December 2017; Accepted 8 March 2018; Published 12 April 2018

Academic Editor: Naïma Moustaïd-Moussa

Copyright © 2018 Jéssica R. Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Wound healing is an evolutionarily conserved process that is essential for species survival. Wound healing involves a series of biochemical and cellular events that are tightly controlled, divided into 3 concomitant and overlapping phases: inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling. Poor wound healing or a chronic wound represents a silent epidemic that affects billions of people worldwide. Considering the involvement of immune cells in its resolution, recent studies are focused on investigating the roles of immune nutrients such as amino acids, minerals, and fatty acids on wound healing. Among the fatty acids, much attention has been given to omega-6 (ω-6) fatty acids since they can modulate cell migration and proliferation, phagocytic capacity, and production of inflammatory mediators. The present review summarizes current knowledge about the role of ω-6 fatty acids in the wound healing context.

1. Wound Healing: A Vital Process

Wound healing occurs after a chemical, physical, or biological insult results in epithelial barrier disruption. This process involves activation of platelets, neutrophils, macrophages, endothelial cells, keratinocytes, and fibroblasts; moreover, the production and release of protein mediators (growth factors and cytokines) released by these cell types and lipid mediators (prostaglandins, leukotrienes, thromboxanes, and lipoxins) are needed to coordinate the tissue repair and to reestablish tissue homeostasis [1, 2].

The process is divided into 3 concomitant and overlapping phases: inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Wound healing process. The illustration shows the inflammatory, proliferative, and remodelling phases of wound healing. Early stages of wound healing include coagulation and activation of inflammatory cells. The proliferative stage involves proliferation of fibroblasts and angiogenesis. The remodelling phase includes restoration of the barrier and contraction of the wound by myofibroblasts. The process is orchestrated by immune cells and growth factors and cytokines and chemokines (listed below) [8]. HF = hair follicle; BV = blood vessels; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; IL-1beta = interleucina 1beta; IL-6 = interleucina 6; ROS = reactive oxygen species; CXCL2 = chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2; IFN-gamma = interferon-gamma; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor; TGF-beta = transforming growth factor beta; FGF = fibroblast growth factor; KGF = keratinocyte growth factor; MCP1 = monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; IGF = insulin growth factor; TIMPs = tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; MMPs = matrix matalloproteinases; PDGF = platelet-derived growth factor; EGF = epithelial growth factor.

After a tissue lesion, the disruption in vasculature blocks the oxygen and nutrient supply to the injured area, leading to a hypoxic condition that induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [35], initiating a coagulation cascade. Blood elements such as platelets, erythrocytes, and fibrin form a framework for the recruitment of immune cells [6, 7]. Platelets produce platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) that induce migration and activation of immune cells [8].

The extracellular matrix (ECM), which is composed of fibronectin, fibrinogen, fibrin, thrombospondin, and vitronectin, fills the tissue defect and enables migration of different cell types required for the healing process [9].

Inflammation is the body’s natural and essential defence mechanism responsible for combating antigens, restoring homeostasis, and repairing tissue damage [10, 11]. The inflammatory response consists of a variety of events triggered by immune cells, which involves influx of leukocytes to the injured area and production of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators [12].

Neutrophils are the predominant cells in the first hours after the tissue injury, and they respond to proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) at the lesion site, phagocytizing microorganisms and cellular debris [10, 13]. For microorganism destruction, the degranulation process occurs, releasing granule enzymes such as defensins, cathelicidins, elastase, myeloperoxidase (MPO), lactoferrins, and cathepsins inside the phagosome. In addition to their microbicidal activities, these molecules also act in the chemoattraction of macrophages to the lesion site. They also amplify the production of cytokines and chemokines, such as chemokine C-X-C motif ligand-2 (CXCL2) that will attract macrophages to the wound area. Neutrophils produce IL-1β, TNF-α, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and express PDGF and TGF-β receptors [8]. These cytokines also induce the expression of adhesion molecules on the endothelial cell surface that will interact with selectins and integrins expressed in macrophages, facilitating the rolling, attachment, and transmigration of these cells to injured areas [1315].

Macrophages are phagocytes that have PDGF, TGF-β, and VEGF receptors, and thus, they migrate in response to mediators produced by platelets and neutrophils in the injured tissue [8].

After 72 hours, macrophages are the predominant cells at the wound site, and they release growth factors (VEGF, PDGF, and EGF) and cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) that promote the migration of other cells such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells [10, 16]. They also produce prostaglandins that activate endothelial cells and act as potent vasodilators, affecting the permeability of microblood vessels [17].

The lack of control in the amplitude and time to resolve inflammation is one of the factors that most influence the genesis of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, asthma, dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease [11, 12, 18], as well as chronic wounds.

The proliferative stage begins within the first 48 hours and can unfold up to the 14th day after a tissue injury [17]. This phase is characterized by angiogenesis and fibroplasia, restoring the blood vessels and forming the granulation tissue [10].

Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting vessels and it is initiated by growth factors such as VEGF, PDGF, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) [10, 19]. Fibroplasia is the formation of granulation tissue, and its main characteristic is proliferation of fibroblasts in response to PDGF, TGF-β, FGF, IL-1, and TNFα. At this time, the production of collagen occurs, and there is a release of growth factors such as keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), TNF-α, FGF, insulin growth factor (IGF), VEGF, and EGF [8, 16]. Then, the provisional matrix initially formed is replaced by granulation tissue composed of fibroblasts, granulocytes, macrophages, and blood vessels in complex with collagen bundles that form the basis for cell adhesion and migration, growth, and differentiation [10, 19].

The remodelling phase occurs approximately from the 21st day after injury and can last for years. During this period, there is intense production and digestion of collagen as well as the substitution of collagen III for collagen I. These events are aimed at maintaining the fibres in the same direction as in unwounded tissue to reestablish its functions and mechanical forces [20].

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-dependent endopeptidases that degrade ECM components (collagens), and their gene expression is regulated at the transcriptional level by cytokines and growth factors as well as by their natural inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) [21].

In all of the processes cited above, it is important to emphasize that exogenous and endogenous factors can modulate such events and influence the healing process. More specifically, systemic disorders, such as diabetes, immunosuppression, and venous stasis as well as those resulting from external agents, such as the use of corticotherapy and smoking, can hinder the early closure of the wound.

Chronic wounds are defined as wounds with a full thickness in depth and a slow healing tendency. The time an open wound needs to remain to define chronicity is still not well established, ranging from 4 weeks to more than 3 months [22]. Including diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure ulcers, they represent a silent epidemic that affects a large fraction of the world population, becoming a public health problem [23, 24].

Complications of chronic wounds include infection that can lead to lower extremity amputations and impacts on health and life quality of patients because they cause pain and suffering, loss of function, loss of productivity, depression, distress and anxiety, social isolation, prolonged hospital stays, and chronic morbidity or even death [25].

Moreover, the treatment of chronic wounds causes economic expenditures by the individual and the healthcare system, and therefore, they are a matter of political interest [26]. In the USA, for example, chronic wounds affect 6.5 million patients, with nearly US$ 50 billion spent on treatment of chronic wounds and complications related to them per year [22, 25].

In developed countries, 1 to 2% of the population will experience a chronic wound throughout their lives [22] due to population ageing and increases in noncommunicable diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cancer [27, 28].

Animal and human studies have shown that in the elderly population (age over 60 years), there is an increase in the number of cases of poor wound healing and chronic wounds due to delayed T-cell infiltration, decreased chemokine production, and reduced macrophage phagocytic capacity, in addition to delayed reepithelization, collagen synthesis, and angiogenesis [28].

Alterations of the peripheral nervous system with decreased protective sensation and foot deformities enhance the risk of chronic skin ulcerations on the lower extremities of diabetic subjects, mainly on the foot, that affect 15% of diabetic patients [29], and five-year postamputation, the mortality rate is 50–59% [30].

Chronic inflammation, insufficient angiogenic response, production of ROS greater than antioxidant capacity, collagen accumulation, dysfunction of migration and proliferation of fibroblast and keratinocytes, and an imbalance between the accumulation and degradation of ECM are some of the mechanisms responsible for poor healing in diabetic patients [1, 28].

These scenarios show the necessity for studies that investigate possible therapies that accelerate tissue repair, reducing the susceptibility to infections [31].

2. Omega-6 Fatty Acids: From Inflammation to Regeneration

For decades, nutritional supplementation was mainly used to avoid nutritional deficiency. However, currently it is being recognized that adequate levels of essential nutrients can prevent as well as treat some disturbances [32].

Fatty acids are carboxylic acids formed by hydrogen and carbon atoms [33]. Based on the presence of double bonds, fatty acids are classified as saturated (no double bonds) or unsaturated (with double bonds). Among the unsaturated fatty acids, there is also a classification that takes into account the number of unsaturations: monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) present with one double bond on acyls (the main food source is olive oil) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) contain two or more double bonds [33].

PUFAs are classified by the position of the first double bound counting from the methyl terminal. Then, when the first double bond is at the 6th carbon atom from the methyl terminal, PUFAs are called omega-6, ω-6, or n-6. They include linoleic acid (LA, C18 : 2 ω-6), an essential fatty acid because it cannot be synthesized by the human body. LA can be “stretched” and desaturated into other ω-6 fatty acids, such as γ-linolenic (GLA, 18 : 3 ω-6) and the arachidonic acid (AA, 20 : 4 ω-6). Moreover, biohydration of linoleic acid by bacteria (anaerobic bacteria such as Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens) in the gut of animals and the action of Δ9 desaturation of 18 : 1 trans-11 in animal tissue can generate conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) [34].

Fatty acids alter skin structural and immunological status since they constitute the stratum corneum, and they can alter the permeability of the skin. They also interfere with maturation and differentiation of the stratum corneum and inhibit production of proinflammatory eicosanoids, reactive species (ROS and RNS), and cytokines, thus influencing the inflammatory response and possibly wound healing [3538].

The objective of this study was to review the scientific literature on the relationship between omega-6 fatty acids (linoleic, conjugated linolenic, gamma-linolenic, and arachidonic acid) and the wound healing process.

2.1. Linoleic Acid

Linoleic acid (LA, 18 : 2 ω-6, cis-9, 12-octadecadienoic acid) is the PUFA most commonly consumed in the human diet, being mainly found in safflower, corn, and sunflower oils, present in medium quantities in soy, sesame, and almond oils, and in smaller quantities in canola, olive, coconut, and palm oils [39].

2.1.1. Effects of LA on Tissue Repair

In developing countries, creams with linoleic acid are used to treat wounds. One of the first studies in this area described that topical application of a solution containing 1.6 g of essential fatty acid (mainly linoleic acid) prevented pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients [40]. This improvement was related to better hydration and elasticity. In this study, the control group received a solution with 1.6 g of mineral oil, which is a liquid paraffin. Although frequently used in baby creams to maintain hydration, in the present study, only 22% of the patients in the control group presented a hydrated skin. On the other hand, 98% of the patients treated with a linoleic solution showed a hydrated skin. These results indicate that maintenance of hydration is a mechanism by which linoleic acid improves wound healing.

In 2008, Magalhães et al. [41] did not observe any effects of topical application of medium chain triglycerides (caprylic, capric, caproic, and lauric acids), linoleic acid, soy lecithin, or a vitamin A and E mixture on wound healing in rats. The main problem with this protocol is the composition of the mixture tested and the control used, since the control group received a 0.9% NaCl solution without antioxidant vitamins or fatty acids.

Other studies described positive effects of oils rich in linoleic acid such as lucuma nut oil (LNO) and pumpkin oil on wound healing [42, 43]. The major constituents of LNO are LA (38.9%), oleic acid (27.9%), and palmitic and stearic acids (18.6 and 8.9%, resp.). Rojo et al. [42] used two different models to prove the beneficial effects of LNO: the zebrafish (Danio rerio) model and a CD-1 murine model. At first, LNO (20–100 μg/mL) was added to a zebrafish larva plate after a tail primordial cut. Through fluorescence microscopy and image analysis of fluorescent endothelial cells from zebrafish, it was observed that LNO accelerated the regeneration. This prohealing effect was attributed to increases in angiogenesis. However, the authors evaluated the number of fluorescent endothelial cells and not the number of new vessels formed. Angiogenesis is a complex process that involves release of proangiogenic factors, such as VEGF, PDGF, and FGF, as well as proteolytic degradation of basement membrane, and the migration, proliferation, and organization of endothelial cells in a tube form [44]. Angiogenesis is a crucial step for proper wound healing since it reestablishes the oxygen and nutrient supply.

LNO was also tested in a CD-1 murine model. For this, a wound was induced in the back region of mice and topically treated with 200, 500, or 100 μg of LNO daily. Corroborating the results with zebrafish, LNO (500 and 1000 μg) also induced a more rapid wound closure in CD-1 mice. The authors hypothesize that this effect could be related to the anti-inflammatory actions of the fatty acids present in the LNO [42]; however, they did not show any results that could support this hypothesis.

Linoleic acid has been thought to be behind the effects of pumpkin oil on wound healing. Pumpkin oil is constituted, mainly by LA (50%), oleic acid (25%), and palmitic acid (15%) [43]. This high content of LA was correlated with improvement in wound closure, since it shortened bleeding time, suggesting a stabilization of fibrin and consequent migration of fibroblast; it augmented hydroxyproline content, possibly due to fibroblast activation; and it reduced the number of infiltrating macrophages in wound tissue 11 days after lesion induction. Altogether, these results indicate that topical treatment with pumpkin oil accelerates tissue repair, mainly due to the effects of LA [43].

Considering these results with LA-rich oils, some groups have tested the effects of pure LA on wound healing. The use of isolated fatty acids ensures that the observed effects are not due to minor oil compounds or a combination of fatty acids.

In this context, it was also reported that there were beneficial effects of pure LA topically applied into wounds. BALB/c mice treated with pure LA (30 μM) for 20 days exhibited accelerated tissue repair 48 hours after wound induction [45]. This result was related to increased production of nitric oxide (NO). NO is a free radical derived from L-arginine oxidation through the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity. After an inflammatory insult, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is expressed in immune cells and produces a large amount of NO that will generate other free radicals, expanding the inflammatory response [46]. NO plays important roles such as activation of macrophages and fibroblasts, induction of collagen synthesis, and the proliferation of keratinocytes during wound healing, thus accelerating reepithelization [47].

However, in Wistar rats, topical treatment with pure LA did not alter the wound area, although there was an increase in wet wound weight (oedema) and in neutrophil numbers, indicating a positive effect on the migratory response during the inflammatory phase [48].

Another approach used to investigate LA effects on wound healing is oral supplementation.

Wistar rats orally supplemented with pure LA (0.22 g per kg body weight) by gavage during the 5 days prior to wound induction had an increased inflammatory response 1 hour (initial stage of inflammation) after skin injury. This proinflammatory effect was characterized by an increase in inflammatory cell influx into the wound site due to elevations in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production and chemokine release. On the other hand, 24 hours later, LA reduced the activation of nuclear transcription factor (NF-κB) and then diminished the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6. At the same time, there was an elevation in AP-1 (activator protein-1) activation. AP-1 is a transcription factor that induces the expression of genes related to proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, which are two important cells involved in the proliferative phase of wound healing. Therefore, LA accelerated the inflammatory phase of wound healing, allowing the next phase (proliferation) to start early and accelerating wound healing over a period of 7 days [49].

More recently, the same protocol was tested in diabetic Wistar rats; the results showed that LA positively modulates tissue repair not only by accelerating the inflammatory phase but also by inducing angiogenesis. During the proliferative phase (7 days), it was observed that LA increased the number of vessels in the wound tissue, which was related to an elevation in VEGF concentration and ANGPT-2 (angiopoietin-2) expression [38]. VEGF and ANGPT-2 are proangiogenic factors essential for new vessel formation. VEGF induces ANGPT-2 expression, which primes endothelial cells to respond to inflammatory cytokines, thereby augmenting the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells [50].

Taken together, these studies demonstrate that linoleic acid can improve wound healing due to its mechanical properties and by modulating the cellular response, increasing the migration and functions of inflammatory and endothelial cells as well as inducing angiogenesis at the wound site.

2.1.2. Mechanisms of Action of LA

The mechanisms described so far to explain the effects of LA on wound healing involve inflammatory responses of neutrophils and macrophages.

Neutrophils are the first cell type recruited to the inflammatory site, being determinants for the healing process [51]. To analyse the effects of LA on neutrophil migration, an air pouch was induced into the dorsal region of Wistar rats treated with LA (100 μM), and 4 hours later, the exudate was collected and the cells were counted. LA increased neutrophil influx to the pouches [48], corroborating the results described in wound tissue. This effect on migration can be explained by the induction of adhesion molecules such as L-selectin on neutrophil surfaces [52]. Neutrophil recruitment is a highly regulated process that involves at least four steps: rolling, activation, adhesion, and transmigration. Through the intravital microscopy assay, it was observed that LA also elevated leukocyte-endothelium interactions (rolling and adhesion) [52].

Once in the injured site, neutrophils produce cytokines, chemokines, ROS, and other molecules to expand the inflammatory response. Measuring intra or extracellular ROS production, Hatanaka et al. [53] demonstrated that LA increased anion superoxide and H2O2 in a dose-dependent manner. The authors tested 5 different techniques (luminol- and lucigenin-amplified chemiluminescence, cytochrome c, hydroethidine, and phenol red reduction) and described that LA interfered with luminol and cytochrome c reactions, jeopardizing the ROS results [53]. In the wound healing context, ROS production is the first event that occurs after tissue disruption due to hypoxia [54]. Low concentrations of H2O2 are important to support wound healing [55] since ROS not only disinfects the injured area but also acts as signalling messengers regulating gene expression [56] and cellular function such as migration [57] and cytokine production [58].

Inflammation control is crucial to tissue repair, since chronic inflammation can worsen the wound. In this sense, LA has also shown a beneficial effect since it increases the release of proinflammatory mediators in the initial inflammation phase (1–4 hours) and reduces them in the resolution phase (18–48 hours) [52].

Another important cell type that is involved in inflammatory responses is the macrophage. As observed with neutrophils, LA reduced the production of IL-1β, IL-6, and VEGF in the absence of LPS, although it accelerated IL-1β release and decreased IL-10 synthesis when cells were stimulated with LPS. However, LA did not affect ROS production (superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and NO) as well as the lipid mediators, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), leukotriene B4 (LTB4), and 15(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15[2]-HETE) [59]. Lipid mediators are a class of inflammatory molecules derived from the metabolization of arachidonic [60], eicosapentaenoic (EPA), or docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids. Classes 2 and 4 are derived from AA and exhibit more proinflammatory effects, increasing migration, production of cytokines, and ROS. On the other hand, classes 3 and 5 are derived from EPA and DHA and are related to anti-inflammatory effects. More recently, a new class of lipid mediators derived from omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) were described, the maresins, resolvins, and protectins that exert proresolution effects, resolving inflammation [61]. During the inflammatory response, it is important that there is a shift between proinflammatory molecules to proresolution to limit the damage induced by exacerbated inflammation.

During the proliferation and remodelling phases, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and keratinocytes play important roles in producing growth factors that orchestrate the reconstruction of vessels and induce wound contraction [62]. In this context, Rojo et al. [42] described a promigratory effect of LNO (60 μg/mL) on human fibroblasts, which was related to an increase in vinculin expression. Vinculin is a focal adhesion protein essential for fibroblasts-ECM interactions [63] involved in wound contraction.

One important aspect not fully clarified is if LA must be metabolized to exert its effects on cellular functions or if it acts as an effector molecule. To answer this question, some studies have described G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR or GPR) as responsible for fatty acid effects [64, 65]. GPR is a class of seven transmembrane receptors involved in a broad spectrum of cellular responses [64]. Among GPR, GPR40 has been described as a sensor for LA, oleic acid (OA), CLA, and other long chain fatty acids [65, 66]. In HaCaT cells (keratinocyte cell line), once activated, it reduced the production of cytokines (CCL-5 and CCL17) and suppressed allergic inflammation in skin [67], and then, it could be involved in the effects of LA on wound healing. These results indicate that LA can modulate immune response by acting as an effector molecule. However, considering the importance of LA to cellular membranes, it is possible that the results observed are due to its metabolization as well. More studies are needed to clarify this point.

In conclusion, it has been shown that LA-rich oil or pure LA modulates cellular functions such as migration, production of ROS, cytokines, and chemokines, expression of adhesion molecules, and interaction with ECM. These alterations seem to be related to improvements in tissue repair.

2.2. Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA)

The presence of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) was first reported in 1930 [68], but only in the 1980s was CLA described as a bioactive dietary constituent, and the interest in CLA’s effects has increased due its anticarcinogenic properties and reduction of adipose tissue mass observed in mice [69].

CLA comprises a mix of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid with a single pair of conjugated double bonds. CLA is formed during LA biohydration by bacteria in the gut of ruminant animals, and thus, the main natural sources of CLA are ruminant meats (beef and lamb) and dairy products (milk and cheese) [69, 70].

At least 28 CLA isomers are known, but the cis-9, trans-11 (c9, t11) is the most abundant form of CLA in nature, and nutritional supplements are a mixture of c9, t11 and trans-10, cis-12 (t10, c12) CLA [71, 72]. Initially, it was thought that the effects of CLA were global, and the results were due to interactions between its two main isomers: c9, t11 and t10, c12. However, later evidence suggested that the physiological effects of CLA may be different between the isomers, animal species (rats and mice), and cell types [73].

The last decade has seen a plethora of claims, supported by animal and cell lineage models, that dietary CLA intake is associated with potential health benefits [70]. These include reduction in fat deposition, protection from atherosclerosis and cancer, and enhanced immunity [69, 74].

Although preclinical data suggest benefits of CLA supplementation, clinical findings in humans have yet to show evidence of a positive effect, and even the findings in animals are still controversial [73].

Some studies revealed that CLA can induce adverse effects such as fatty liver, insulin resistance, and lipodystrophy [75]. Thus, it is recommended that ingestion of a balanced diet with natural sources of CLA be followed.

2.2.1. Effects of CLA on Tissue Repair

Mice fed a diet supplemented with 0.5% or 1% CLA (38% c9, t11 CLA; 39% t10, c12 CLA; 3% c9, c11 CLA; and 1% t9, t11 CLA) for 2 weeks presented a reduction in wound area (1% CLA) that was related to an increase in antioxidant defences [76]. ROS are essential to protect the organism against invading bacteria and other microorganisms; moreover, they are important to intracellular signalling. However, excessive production of ROS or impaired detoxification of these molecules causes oxidative stress [54]. To understand the prohealing effect, the authors measured malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the liver, a marker of lipid peroxidation, and the expression of antioxidant enzymes at the wound site. Mice supplemented with CLA had a reduced MDA content and increased CuZn superoxide dismutase (SOD) and MnSOD protein expression, showing an antioxidant effect of this fatty acid, which can explain its benefit on wound healing. At the same time, they described a reduction of phosphorylated inhibitor kappa B alpha (pIκBα) protein expression at the end of the inflammatory phase of wound healing [76]. In the cytoplasm, NF-κB is found complexed with IκB. Once phosphorylated, IκB releases NF-κB that translocates to the nucleus and induces the expression of genes related to inflammatory responses [77]. Therefore, the reduction in pIκBα indicates that NF-κB is in the cytoplasm, and the expression of proinflammatory genes is reduced. To show this, the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and HO-1 was evaluated. CLA reduced the protein expression of these inflammatory genes, confirming its inhibitory effect on NF-κB activation [76].

In the carcinogenic context, topical application of CLA to hairless mouse skin also reduced COX-2 expression due to inhibition of NF-κB activation in the skin [78]. To elucidate the CLA effects on the NF-κB pathway, it was described that this fatty acid downregulated the catalytic activity of IκB kinase (IKKα/β), mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK), and protein kinase B (Akt) [78]. We suggest Zhang et al. [77] for a comprehensive review of the NF-κB signalling pathway.

2.2.2. Mechanisms of Action of CLA

The mechanisms by which CLA modulates immune function are not completely elucidated, but they include regulation of prostaglandin and cytokine production, since it has been observed that CLA reduces COX-2 expression and modulates NF-κB activation [76, 78, 79].

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) treated with t10, c12 CLA (100 μM) for 24 hours diminished TNF-α production. This effect seems to be isomer-specific since treatment with c9, t11 CLA (100 μM) or LA (100 μM) had no effect on TNF-α concentration [80].

Cho et al. [81] suggested that t10, c12 CLA has a priming effect on polymorphonuclear (PMN) and mononuclear cells isolated from dogs. PMN or mononuclear cells directly treated with CLA did not alter TNF-α production. Thus, they took this preconditioned medium and added it to a new cell culture. This preconditioned medium increased TNF-α concentrations and augmented the oxidative burst activity and phagocytic capacity of PMN and mononuclear cells [81]. When the recombinant anti-TNF-α antibody was added to this preconditioned medium, the effects were abolished, suggesting that the effects of CLA are mediated by TNF-α released from PBMC.

Taken together, these results showed that dietary administration of CLA can improve wound healing due to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in the later inflammatory phase of tissue repair.

2.3. Gamma Linolenic Acid (GLA)

Gamma-linolenic acid (GLA, 18 : 3 ω-6) is an omega-6 fatty acid formed through LA metabolization, due to delta-6-desaturase action [82]. It is found in plant seed oils, such as borage, black current seed, and primrose oil [83]. The most common form of GLA consumption is through oral supplementation with GLA-rich oil capsules, mainly from evening primrose oil (EPO) [84].

GLA has been investigated in chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis [83, 85, 86], atopic dermatitis, acne vulgaris, and psoriasis [8789] due to its anti-inflammatory effects. GLA can be converted into dihomo-γ-linoleic acid (DGLA), which is metabolized into prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) or 15-hydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (15-HETrE) [82, 89]. These eicosanoids have anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects [85].

2.3.1. Effects of GLA on Tissue Repair

GLA ingestion was also used to treat patients with acne vulgaris [88]. In this study, 45 patients received 2 capsules of borage oil (400 mg of GLA) for 10 weeks, and acne lesion number and severity were assessed as well as inflammation by histological analysis. The GLA group had a reduction in the lesion number and severity, which could be associated with a reduction in inflammation and interleukin-8 (IL-8) staining demonstrated by histologic analysis [88]. Although the authors speculate that two mechanisms (modulation of inflammation and improvement of skin quality) could explain their results, no other analyses were made of their samples. Therefore, it is not possible to affirm how GLA had beneficial effects on acnes vulgaris.

Ingestion of GLA-rich oil capsules was also related to clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis (AD) [89]. The clinical effect was positively correlated with plasma GLA and DGLA concentrations after 4 weeks of capsule consumption.

2.3.2. Mechanisms of Action of GLA

Considering the relevance of macrophages in inflammatory processes such as arthritis and wound healing, it is of great value to investigate the effects of GLA on their functions.

In the RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line, GLA concentrations (100 to 200 μM) reduced the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and consequently the NO concentration [90]. GLA also inhibited the expression of COX-2 and prointerleukin-1, suggesting a reduction in inflammatory responses. To explain these results, the authors evaluated the expression of proteins involved in the NF-κB pathway. GLA diminished IκB phosphorylation and degradation, blocking the transmigration of NF-κB to the nucleus, which was confirmed by the reduction in nuclear p65 protein expression. Altogether, these results explain the reduced activation of NF-κB in GLA-treated macrophages [90].

More studies are necessary to prove the beneficial effects of GLA on wound healing.

2.4. Arachidonic Acid

Arachidonic acid (AA, 20 : 4 ω-6) is the second most abundant fatty acid in injured tissue after a tissue lesion [91]. Once released from membrane phospholipids by phospholipase A2, AA is metabolized by cyclooxygenases and lipoxygenases and produces the eicosanoids [92].

Eicosanoids are a wide variety of 20-carbon bioactive lipid products that include prostaglandins (PGs) and thromboxanes (TXs) of series 2 and leukotrienes (LTs) of series 4, lipoxins (LXs), hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HETEs), and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) [93] that modulate inflammatory responses. They are highly potent, short-lived molecules that act locally and have been strongly associated with a variety of physiological and pathological processes including cancer, inflammatory diseases, and wound healing [92]. In the wound healing process, the effects of AA are associated mainly with the production of eicosanoids, because they are abundant in the wound bed [94].

The AA metabolites are predominantly proinflammatory because they stimulate the chemotaxis of inflammatory cells, increase the activity of elastase that degrades extracellular proteins, and impair the formation and remodelling of healing tissue [94].

2.4.1. Effects of AA on Tissue Repair

Considering that AA generates eicosanoids and that these molecules modulate tissue repair, an AA-enriched diet was tested in an intestinal ischaemia-injured model [95]. The diets were enriched with 0.5 or 5% of AA and administered over 10 days to pigs. After this period, blockage of the mesenteric blood vessels induced an ischaemic ileum injury, and the protective and reparative effects of AA administration were analysed. It was observed there was a protective effect of AA (5%) since the percentage of denuded villus area was reduced in relationship to the control. At the same time, the AA group presented an improvement in recovery since these animals showed a reduction in mucosal-to-serosal flux of 3H-mannitol and 14C-inulin when compared with the control group (0% of AA), suggesting that the epithelial barrier is more preserved in the AA group [95]. Although AA-enriched diet (5%) does not alter COX-2 mRNA expression, it was observed that there was an increase in PGE2 concentration after ischaemic injury [95]. This effect was abolished when animals received indomethacin, a nonselective COX inhibitor. PGE2 has been described to be a protective factor that stimulates the recovery of gut injury [96]. One of the mechanisms involved is the induction of angiogenesis due to an increase in VEGF content [97].

In the dextran sodium sulphate-induced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) model, oral administration of AA (240 mg/kg of body weight) for 8 weeks aggravated inflammation since it increased COX-2, LTB4, and TXB2 concentrations in colonic tissue. AA also elevated myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and macrophage infiltration, which reinforces its proinflammatory effect [98].

Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) are metabolites produced from AA due to cytochrome P450 (CYP450) activity, predominantly in the endothelium. EETs can stimulate angiogenesis and organ or tissue regeneration [21, 99]. Local application of 11,12- or 14,15-EETs (10 μM/methylcellulose discs) accelerated wound healing due to the increase in MMP2 and MMP7 and reduction in TIMP-1 and TNF-α during the proliferative phase of wound healing (12 days). These results indicate that EETs favoured extracellular matrix degradation and endothelial cell migration, two important steps in the angiogenesis process [21]. These positive effects were also confirmed in transgenic animals that exhibit high or low EET. In this model, the wound healing was accelerated in high EET animals due to vascularization [100].

To better explain the roles of lipid mediators during impaired wound healing, a lipidomic approach was carried out in transgenic animals (LIGHT−/−) that exhibited an exacerbated inflammatory response characterized by high levels of oxidative stress and cytokines and imbalance between production and degradation of ECM [99]. These animals had increased concentrations of 11-, 12-, and 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, leukotrienes (LTD4 and LTE), prostaglandins (PGE2 and PGF2), thromboxane (TXA2/TXB2), and prostacyclins in early stages (1 day) of wound healing. These results were associated with enhanced coagulation and infiltration of neutrophils in LIGHT−/− when compared with wild type mice [99].

The factors that lead to colitis, ischemia-reperfusion damage, and skin wound are physiologically different as well as the responses observed in these conditions. Although a general inflammatory response is usually observed, which is characterized by recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells, production of cytokines and growth factors as well as the repair of the damaged tissue, there are specificities inherent to each tissue that can change the effect of determined fatty acid.

2.4.2. Mechanisms of Action of AA

In agreement with the in vivo studies, AA induced endothelial cell adhesion in vitro. Once again, this modulatory effect presented a biphasic pattern as also observed with other fatty acids, such as LA. In the first phase, the positive effect on cell spreading was independent of AA concentration. However, in the later phase, there was an inverse correlation between AA concentration and spreading [101]. Low AA concentrations (20 μM) increased cell spreading, and high AA concentrations (80 μM) reduced it. This effect could be associated with the metabolites generated from AA oxidation. At a low concentration, AA is totally metabolized, and the products can induce cell adhesion. On the other hand, at high concentrations, the reaction is saturated in AA, and the enzymes involved are not sufficient to metabolize all AA available. Then, there is a reduction in AA metabolites and consequently a reduction in cell spreading [101]. AA also randomizes the migration of endothelial cells. This action is related to the loss of direction during migration due to the presence of AA and seems to be inversely correlated with AA concentration [101].

Some of these AA effects, observed in endothelial cells, were also described in human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs), and once again, AA concentration was inversely related with the migratory response. The mechanism behind this effect seems to involve GPR40 [91], a membrane receptor for fatty acids [102].

In a very detailed study, Oh et al. [91] demonstrated that AA binds to GPR40 and then induces mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC2) phosphorylation (mTORser2481) that activates Aktser407, which phosphorylates protein kinase Cζ (PKCζ). pPKCζ activates p38, through Sp1 phosphorylation, and increases the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMP degrades fibronectin, an extracellular matrix component, promoting the migration of hUCB-MSCs.

Altogether, the studies demonstrate that AA and its metabolites promote wound healing due to induction of cell migration and angiogenesis. However, these positive effects are closely related with the concentrations used.

3. Summary

Wound healing is an evolutionarily conserved process essential for species’ survival. An investigation of factors that improve wound healing is of crucial interest. Experimental and clinical studies indicate that LA improves wound healing due to its biphasic effects on the inflammatory phase of tissue repair (Table 1). CLA seems to have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects on the later inflammatory phase of tissue repair, favouring the beginning of the proliferative phase (Table 2). Although less studied, GLA presented positive effects controlling inflammation (Table 3). Studies investigating the effects of AA demonstrated that AA and its metabolites promoted wound healing due to induction of cell migration and angiogenesis (Table 4).

Table 1: Effects of linoleic (LA) fatty acid.
Table 2: Effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA).
Table 3: Effects of gamma linolenic (GLA) fatty acid.
Table 4: Effects of arachidonic (AA) fatty acid.

In general, omega-6 fatty acids positively modulate all phases of wound healing, but more studies are necessary to clarify the mechanisms involved (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Effects of linoleic acid (LA), conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), gamma linolenic acid (GLA), and arachidonic acid on wound healing phases.

Clinical studies are essential to establish the strategies of fatty acid administration (topically or orally), the optimal concentrations, and their safety.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest or anything to disclose.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors did the literature search. Jéssica R. Silva and Beatriz Burger wrote the manuscript and contributed equally to this paper. Hosana G. Rodrigues also wrote the manuscript and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2013/06810-4).

References

  1. H. Brem and M. Tomic-Canic, “Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1219–1222, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y.-S. Wu and S.-N. Chen, “Apoptotic cell: linkage of inflammation and wound healing,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 5, p. 1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. M. Loree, A. A. L. Pereira, M. Lam et al., “Classifying colorectal cancer by tumor location rather than sidedness highlights a continuum in mutation profiles and consensus molecular subtypes,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1062–1072, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Dunnill, T. Patton, J. Brennan et al., “Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and wound healing: the functional role of ROS and emerging ROS-modulating technologies for augmentation of the healing process,” International Wound Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Nauta, V. van Hinsbergh, and P. Koolwijk, “Hypoxic signaling during tissue repair and regenerative medicine,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 19791–19815, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. G. Menter, S. Kopetz, E. Hawk et al., “Platelet “first responders” in wound response, cancer, and metastasis,” Cancer Metastasis Reviews, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 199–213, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Xue and C. J. Jackson, “Extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 119–136, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. S. A. Eming, P. Martin, and M. Tomic-Canic, “Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 265, article 265sr6, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. E. Tracy, R. A. Minasian, and E. J. Caterson, “Extracellular matrix and dermal fibroblast function in the healing wound,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 119–136, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. N. X. Landen, D. Li, and M. Ståhle, “Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 73, no. 20, pp. 3861–3885, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. Raphael and L. Sordillo, “Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammation: the role of phospholipid biosynthesis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 21167–21188, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. C. Calder, “Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: nutrition or pharmacology?” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 645–662, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. J. Shaw and P. Martin, “Wound repair at a glance,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 122, no. 18, pp. 3209–3213, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. C. Gurtner, S. Werner, Y. Barrandon, and M. T. Longaker, “Wound repair and regeneration,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7193, pp. 314–321, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. A. Eming, T. A. Wynn, and P. Martin, “Inflammation and metabolism in tissue repair and regeneration,” Science, vol. 356, no. 6342, pp. 1026–1030, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. Chow and A. Barbul, “Immunonutrition: role in wound healing and tissue regeneration,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Li, J. Chen, and R. Kirsner, “Pathophysiology of acute wound healing,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Chilton, R. Murphy, B. Wilson et al., “Diet-gene interactions and PUFA metabolism: a potential contributor to health disparities and human diseases,” Nutrients, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1993–2022, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. M. Reinke and H. Sorg, “Wound repair and regeneration,” European Surgical Research, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. S. MacLeod and J. N. Mansbridge, “The innate immune system in acute and chronic wounds,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 65–78, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. L. Sander, K. Sommer, T. Neumayer et al., “Soluble epoxide hydrolase disruption as therapeutic target for wound healing,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 362–367, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Järbrink, G. Ni, H. Sönnergren et al., “Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review,” Systematic Reviews, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 152, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. K. Sen, G. M. Gordillo, S. Roy et al., “Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 763–771, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. G. Frykberg and J. Banks, “Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 560–582, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. K. Copeland and A. R. Purvis, “A retrospective chart review of chronic wound patients treated with topical oxygen therapy,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 143–152, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. K. Heyer, M. Augustin, K. Protz, K. Herberger, C. Spehr, and S. J. Rustenbach, “Effectiveness of advanced versus conventional wound dressings on healing of chronic wounds: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Dermatology, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 172–184, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Wicke, A. Bachinger, S. Coerper, S. Beckert, M. B. Witte, and A. Königsrainer, “Aging influences wound healing in patients with chronic lower extremity wounds treated in a specialized wound care center,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Guo and L. A. Dipietro, “Factors affecting wound healing,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 219–229, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Anderson and R. L. Hamm, “Factors that impair wound healing,” Journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 84–91, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. U. Okonkwo and L. DiPietro, “Diabetes and wound angiogenesis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 7, p. 1419, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. J. Ennis, A. Sui, and A. Bartholomew, “Stem cells and healing: impact on inflammation,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 369–378, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. L. Das, E. Bhaumik, U. Raychaudhuri, and R. Chakraborty, “Role of nutraceuticals in human health,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 173–183, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. C. Calder, “Fatty acids and inflammation: the cutting edge between food and pharma,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 668, Supplement 1, pp. S50–S58, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. R. Kepler, K. P. Hirons, J. McNeill, and S. B. Tove, “Intermediates and products of the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by Butyrinvibrio fibrisolvens,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 241, no. 6, pp. 1350–1354, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. W. Alexander and D. M. Supp, “Role of arginine and omega-3 fatty acids in wound healing and infection,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 682–690, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. P. C. Calder, “Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes,” Nutrients, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 355–374, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. M. McCusker and J. M. Grant-Kels, “Healing fats of the skin: the structural and immunologic roles of the ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 440–451, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. G. Rodrigues, M. A. R. Vinolo, F. T. Sato et al., “Oral administration of linoleic acid induces new vessel formation and improves skin wound healing in diabetic rats,” PloS One, vol. 11, no. 10, article e0165115, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. N. Kaur, V. Chugh, and A. K. Gupta, “Essential fatty acids as functional components of foods-a review,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2289–2303, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. V. Declair, “The usefulness of topical application of essential fatty acids (EFA) to prevent pressure ulcers,” Ostomy/Wound Management, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 48–52, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  41. M. S. F. Magalhães, F. V. Fechine, R. N. de Macedo et al., “Effect of a combination of medium chain triglycerides, linoleic acid, soy lecithin and vitamins A and E on wound healing in rats,” Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 262–269, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. E. Rojo, C. M. Villano, G. Joseph et al., “Wound-healing properties of nut oil from Pouteria lucuma,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 185–195, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Bardaa, N. Ben Halima, F. Aloui et al., “Oil from pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seeds: evaluation of its functional properties on wound healing in rats,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 73, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. P. Carmeliet, “Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 389–395, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. R. B. Cardoso, M. A. Souza, E. A. V. Ferro, S. Favoreto, and J. D. O. Pena, “Influence of topical administration of n-3 and n-6 essential and n-9 nonessential fatty acids on the healing of cutaneous wounds,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 235–243, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Víteček, A. Lojek, G. Valacchi, and L. Kubala, “Arginine-based inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase: therapeutic potential and challenges,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2012, Article ID 318087, 22 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Frank, H. Kämpfer, C. Wetzler, and J. Pfeilschifter, “Nitric oxide drives skin repair: novel functions of an established mediator,” Kidney International, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 882–888, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. M. Pereira, E. Hatanaka, E. F. Martins et al., “Effect of oleic and linoleic acids on the inflammatory phase of wound healing in rats,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 197–204, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. H. G. Rodrigues, M. A. R. Vinolo, J. Magdalon et al., “Oral administration of oleic or linoleic acid accelerates the inflammatory phase of wound healing,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 208–215, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. O. Gealekman, A. Burkart, M. Chouinard, S. M. Nicoloro, J. Straubhaar, and S. Corvera, “Enhanced angiogenesis in obesity and in response to PPARγ activators through adipocyte VEGF and ANGPTL4 production,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 295, no. 5, pp. E1056–E1064, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. T. N. Mayadas, X. Cullere, and C. A. Lowell, “The multifaceted functions of neutrophils,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 181–218, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. H. G. Rodrigues, M. A. R. Vinolo, J. Magdalon et al., “Dietary free oleic and linoleic acid enhances neutrophil function and modulates the inflammatory response in rats,” Lipids, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 809–819, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. E. Hatanaka, A. C. Levada-Pires, T. C. Pithon-Curi, and R. Curi, “Systematic study on ROS production induced by oleic, linoleic, and γ-linolenic acids in human and rat neutrophils,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1124–1132, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Schafer and S. Werner, “Oxidative stress in normal and impaired wound repair,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 165–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Roy, S. Khanna, K. Nallu, T. K. Hunt, and C. K. Sen, “Dermal wound healing is subject to redox control,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 211–220, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. J. Morgan and Z.-g. Liu, “Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF-κB signaling,” Cell Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 103–115, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. N. Tobar, M. Cáceres, J. F. Santibáñez, P. C. Smith, and J. Martínez, “RAC1 activity and intracellular ROS modulate the migratory potential of MCF-7 cells through a NADPH oxidase and NF-κB-dependent mechanism,” Cancer Letters, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. Han, M. D. Ybanez, S. Ahmadi, K. Yeh, and N. Kaplowitz, “Redox regulation of tumor necrosis factor signaling,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2245–2263, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. Magdalon, M. A. R. Vinolo, H. G. Rodrigues et al., “Oral administration of oleic or linoleic acids modulates the production of inflammatory mediators by rat macrophages,” Lipids, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 803–812, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. Frieder, D. Kivelevitch, C. T. Fiore, S. Saad, and A. Menter, “The impact of biologic agents on health-related quality of life outcomes in patients with psoriasis,” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. N. Serhan, “Discovery of specialized pro-resolving mediators marks the dawn of resolution physiology and pharmacology,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 58, pp. 1–11, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. I. Pastar, O. Stojadinovic, N. C. Yin et al., “Epithelialization in wound healing: a comprehensive review,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 445–464, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. S. Liu, X. Shi-wen, L. Kennedy et al., “FAK is required for TGFβ-induced JNK phosphorylation in fibroblasts: implications for acquisition of a matrix-remodeling phenotype,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2169–2178, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. A. R. Vinolo, S. M. Hirabara, and R. Curi, “G-protein-coupled receptors as fat sensors,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 112–116, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. P. Briscoe, M. Tadayyon, J. L. Andrews et al., “The orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR40 is activated by medium and long chain fatty acids,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 13, pp. 11303–11311, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. Sartorius, A. Drescher, M. Panse et al., “Mice lacking free fatty acid receptor 1 (GPR40/FFAR1) are protected against conjugated linoleic acid-induced fatty liver but develop inflammation and insulin resistance in the brain,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2272–2284, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. T. Fujita, T. Matsuoka, T. Honda, K. Kabashima, T. Hirata, and S. Narumiya, “A GPR40 agonist GW9508 suppresses CCL5, CCL17, and CXCL10 induction in keratinocytes and attenuates cutaneous immune inflammation,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 1660–1667, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. P. W. Parodi, “Conjugated linoleic acid: the early years,” in Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid Research Volume I, M. P. Yuramecz, M. M. Mossoba, J. K. G. Kramer, M. W. Pariza, and G. J. Nelson, Eds., pp. 1–11, AOCS Press, Champaing, IL, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  69. M. H. Cooper, J. R. Miller, P. L. Mitchell, D. L. Currie, and R. S. McLeod, “Conjugated linoleic acid isomers have no effect on atherosclerosis and adverse effects on lipoprotein and liver lipid metabolism in apoE−/− mice fed a high-cholesterol diet,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 294–302, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. A. Bhattacharya, J. Banu, M. Rahman, J. Causey, and G. Fernandes, “Biological effects of conjugated linoleic acids in health and disease,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 789–810, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Y. Kim, J. Kim, K. Y. Whang, and Y. Park, “Impact of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on skeletal muscle metabolism,” Lipids, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 159–178, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. R. Wall, R. P. Ross, G. F. Fitzgerald, and C. Stanton, “Fatty acids from fish: the anti-inflammatory potential of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 280–289, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. Viladomiu, R. Hontecillas, and J. Bassaganya-Riera, “Modulation of inflammation and immunity by dietary conjugated linoleic acid,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 785, pp. 87–95, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. Roy, J. M. Chardigny, D. Bauchart et al., “Butters rich either in trans-10-C18:1 or in trans-11-C18:1 plus cis-9, trans-11 CLA differentially affect plasma lipids and aortic fatty streak in experimental atherosclerosis in rabbits,” Animal, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 467–476, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. Oleszczuk, L. Oleszczuk, A. K. Siwicki, and E. Skopińska-Skopińska, “Biological effects of conjugated linoleic acids supplementation,” Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 403–408, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  76. N. Y. Park, G. Valacchi, and Y. Lim, “Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on early inflammatory responses during cutaneous wound healing,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2010, Article ID 342328, 8 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. F. Zhang, R. Zhong, S. Li et al., “Acute hypoxia induced an imbalanced M1/M2 activation of microglia through NF-κB signaling in Alzheimer’s disease mice and wild-type littermates,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 282, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. D.-M. Hwang, J. K. Kundu, J.-W. Shin, J.-C. Lee, H. J. Lee, and Y.-J. Surh, “cis-9, trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid down-regulates phorbol ester-induced NF-κB activation and subsequent COX-2 expression in hairless mouse skin by targeting IκB kinase and PI3K-Akt,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 363–371, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. T. L. Hwang, Y. C. Su, H. L. Chang et al., “Suppression of superoxide anion and elastase release by C18 unsaturated fatty acids in human neutrophils,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1395–1408, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. C. Perdomo, J. E. Santos, and L. Badinga, “trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid and the PPAR-γ agonist rosiglitazone attenuate lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-α production by bovine immune cells,” Domestic Animal Endocrinology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 118–125, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. H. Cho, J. H. Kang, and M. P. Yang, “Immunoenhancing effect of trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid on the phagocytic capacity and oxidative burst activity of canine peripheral blood phagocytes,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 269–278, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. Lee, H. Lee, S. B. Kang, and W. Park, “Fatty acid desaturases, polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation, and biotechnological advances,” Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 1, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C. Dawczynski, U. Hackermeier, M. Viehweger, R. Stange, M. Springer, and G. Jahreis, “Incorporation of n-3 PUFA and γ-linolenic acid in blood lipids and red blood cell lipids together with their influence on disease activity in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis - a randomized controlled human intervention trial,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 130, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. Taweechaisupapong, N. Srisuk, C. Nimitpornsuko, T. Vattraphoudes, C. Rattanayatikul, and K. Godfrey, “Evening primrose oil effects on osteoclasts during tooth movement,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 356–361, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  85. B. C. Olendzki, K. Leung, S. Van Buskirk, G. Reed, and R. B. Zurier, “Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with marine and botanical oils: influence on serum lipids,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 827286, 9 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. D. Vasiljevic, M. Veselinovic, M. Jovanovic et al., “Evaluation of the effects of different supplementation on oxidative status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1909–1915, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. R. H. Foster, G. Hardy, and R. G. Alany, “Borage oil in the treatment of atopic dermatitis,” Nutrition, vol. 26, no. 7-8, pp. 708–718, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. Y. Jung, H. H. Kwon, J. S. Hong et al., “Effect of dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acid and gamma-linolenic acid on acne vulgaris: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial,” Acta Dermato Venereologica, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 521–5, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. D. Simon, P. A. Eng, S. Borelli et al., “Gamma-linolenic acid levels correlate with clinical efficacy of evening primrose oil in patients with atopic dermatitis,” Advances in Therapy, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 180–188, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. C. S. Chang, H. L. Sun, C. K. Lii, H. W. Chen, P. Y. Chen, and K. L. Liu, “Gamma-linolenic acid inhibits inflammatory responses by regulating NF-κB and AP-1 activation in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages,” Inflammation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 46–57, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. S. Y. Oh, S. J. Lee, Y. H. Jung, H. J. Lee, and H. J. Han, “Arachidonic acid promotes skin wound healing through induction of human MSC migration by MT3-MMP-mediated fibronectin degradation,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 6, no. 5, article e1750, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. S. Tuncer and S. Banerjee, “Eicosanoid pathway in colorectal cancer: recent updates,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 41, pp. 11748–11766, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. A. C. Kendall and A. Nicolaou, “Bioactive lipid mediators in skin inflammation and immunity,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 141–164, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. R. K. Sivamani, “Eicosanoids and keratinocytes in wound healing,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 476–481, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. S. K. Jacobi, A. J. Moeser, B. A. Corl, R. J. Harrell, A. T. Blikslager, and J. Odle, “Dietary long-chain PUFA enhance acute repair of ischemia-injured intestine of suckling pigs,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 142, no. 7, pp. 1266–1271, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. A. T. Blikslager, A. J. Moeser, J. L. Gookin, S. L. Jones, and J. Odle, “Restoration of barrier function in injured intestinal mucosa,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 545–564, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. K. Takeuchi, M. Tanigami, K. Amagase, A. Ochi, S. Okuda, and R. Hatazawa, “Endogenous prostaglandin E2 accelerates healing of indomethacin-induced small intestinal lesions through upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by activation of EP4 receptors,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 25, pp. S67–S74, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. Y. Naito, X. Ji, S. Tachibana et al., “Effects of arachidonic acid intake on inflammatory reactions in dextran sodium sulphate-induced colitis in rats,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 734–745, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. S. Dhall, D. S. Wijesinghe, Z. A. Karim et al., “Arachidonic acid-derived signaling lipids and functions in impaired healing,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 644–656, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. D. Panigrahy, B. T. Kalish, S. Huang et al., “Epoxyeicosanoids promote organ and tissue regeneration,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 33, pp. 13528–33, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. N. S. Rossen, A. J. Hansen, C. Selhuber-Unkel, and L. B. Oddershede, “Arachidonic acid randomizes endothelial cell motion and regulates adhesion and migration,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 9, article e25196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. T. Tomita, K. Hosoda, J. Fujikura, N. Inagaki, and K. Nakao, “The G-protein-coupled long-chain fatty acid receptor GPR40 and glucose metabolism,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 5, p. 152, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus