Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 6494306 | 12 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6494306

H2S Protects against Cardiac Cell Hypertrophy through Regulation of Selenoproteins

Academic Editor: László Virág
Received06 May 2019
Revised25 Jul 2019
Accepted05 Aug 2019
Published10 Sep 2019


Cardiac hypertrophy is defined as the enlargement of the cardiac myocytes, leading to improper nourishment and oxygen supply due to the increased functional demand. This increased stress on the cardiac system commonly leads to myocardial infarction, contributing to 85% of all cardiac-related deaths. Cystathionine gamma-lyase- (CSE-) derived H2S is a novel gasotransmitter and plays a critical role in the preservation of cardiac functions. Selenocysteine lyase (SCLY) has been identified to produce H2Se, the selenium homologue of H2S. Deficiency of selenium is often found in Keshan disease, a congestive cardiomyopathy. The interaction of H2S and H2Se in cardiac cell hypertrophy has not been explored. In this study, cell viability was evaluated with a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Oxidative stress and cell size were observed through immunostaining. The expression of genes was determined by real-time PCR and western blot. Here, we demonstrated that incubation of rat cardiac cells (H9C2) with H2O2 lead to increased oxidative stress and cell surface area, which were significantly attenuated by pretreatment of either H2S or H2Se. H2S incubation induced SCLY/H2Se signaling, which next caused higher expressions and activities of selenoproteins, including glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase. Furthermore, deficiency of CSE inhibited the expressions of SCLY and selenoprotein P in mouse heart tissues. We also found that both H2S and H2Se stimulated Nrf2-targeted downstream genes. These data suggests that H2S protects against cardiac hypertrophy through enhancement of a group of antioxidant proteins.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death world-wide contributing to approximately 31% of all deaths annually. More than 85% of all CVD-related deaths are contributed to or caused by heart attacks and strokes, both of which are typical end results of chronic pathologies, such as cardiac hypertrophy [1]. Cardiac hypertrophy is both a natural and responsive change where the myocardium undergoes overgrowth in response to external and internal stimuli, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) or pressure overload [1, 2]. An increase in heart size is accompanied by a high demand of oxygen and nutrients to sustain function. In cases where the oxygen and nutrient demand is not met, myocardial ischemic conditions persist, which will result in cardiac cell death, tissue fibrosis, and subsequent cardiac infarcture [3]. Two fetal genes atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) have long been used as molecular markers for the diagnosis of pathological hypertrophy [35].

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a highly diffusible molecule and classified as a novel gasotransmitter along with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide [69]. H2S can be produced endogenously in our cells through cystathionine gamma-lyase (CSE), cystathionine beta-synthetase (CBS), and/or 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MST) [10, 11]. The concentration of H2S is not homogenous throughout different tissues; certain tissues have higher production rates such as the liver and vasculature, when compared to other tissues such as neuronal [10]. This difference in production affects the distribution of H2S-producing enzymes throughout the body; CSE has the greatest H2S-producing ability through the catalysis of L-cysteine (Cys) to H2S [8, 12]. H2S levels in the vasculature have been estimated to be somewhere from 10 to 100 μM with initial techniques; however, more recently, there has been controversial evidence of levels in the low nanomolar range [10, 11]. In the vasculature, CSE is the dominant enzyme for H2S production, where CSE knockout mice show markedly decreased plasma H2S levels and cardiac dysfunction [8, 12]. H2S signals through posttranslational modifications of proteins known as S-sulfhydration and plays a role in metabolic and redox regulation [1315].

Selenium shares very similar features as sulfur and has been strongly characterized as a micronutrient that walks a fine line between beneficial and toxic dosages [16, 17]. Keshan disease is a cardiomyopathy pathologically similar to chronic cardiac hypertrophy resulting in myocardial infarcture, which is actually attributed to the deficiency of selenium [18]. Although selenium-related cardiomyopathies are not entirely understood, it is believed that reduced antioxidant capabilities are strongly correlated [19, 20]. Selenium incorporation into selenoproteins is the cornerstone of antioxidant defence systems and therefore likely leads to altered redox signaling [21]. In the 3-untranslated region of selenoprotein mRNA, there is a selenocysteine (Sec) insertion sequence (SECIS) that folds into a specific secondary structure, allowing for the recruitment of eukaryotic elongation factor selenocysteine (eEFSec) for facilitating Sec insertion in the stop codon of UGA [22]. To date, around 26 selenoproteins have been identified in mammals with just under half dedicated to antioxidant effects and redox signaling, including glutathione peroxidase (GPx), thioredoxin reductases (TrxR), and selenoprotein P (SePP1) [19, 23].

Hydrogen selenide (H2Se), the selenium homologue to H2S, is produced by the enzyme selenocysteine lyase (SCLY) for catalyzing the cleavage of Sec into H2Se and L-alanine [24, 25]. However, despite the similarities in structure and metabolism, selenium and sulfur systems share different chemical properties. Cys’s pKa lies around 8.3 whereas Sec’s is 5.2 and more than doubles Cys in its redox potential being -488 mV [24]. This high redox potential likely contributes to the effective involvement of selenoproteins in antioxidant defence, contributing to its hallmark reputation. Based on the homology and uniqueness of H2S and H2Se systems, both in their production and the similarities between their base element, it is reasonable to propose that H2Se may share some biological characteristics and functions of H2S, as a fourth gasotransmitter. In this study, we tested the interaction of H2S and H2Se systems in protection against cardiac hypertrophy as well as the underlying mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Rat cardiomyocytes (H9C2, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Every second day, the cells were washed with 1 ml Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) and the fresh media were added. H9C2 cells were cultured to a maximum of 80% confluence to avoid cellular differentiation.

2.2. Cell Viability Assay

The cell viability was measured based on the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay as described previously [26]. H9C2 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 15000 cells/well and allowed to sit overnight. After various treatments for 24 hours, MTT (0.5 mg/ml) in serum-free medium was added to each well and the plates were further incubated at 37°C for additional 4 hours. The MTT formazan was finally dissolved in 100 μl dimethyl sulfoxide, following the absorbance measurement at 570 nm by a FLUOstar OPTIMA microplate spectrophotometer (BMG Labtech, Germany). The control cells with no treatment were considered as 100% viable, and the reading values were converted to the percentage of the control.

2.3. Measurement of the ROS Level

Fluorescent probe 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA-H2) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON) was used to detect ROS [27, 28]. H9C2 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and grown to 80% confluence. The cells were then incubated with or without 30 μM NaHS or 0.3 μM Na2Se for 30 minutes, washed with PBS, and incubated with 200 μM H2O2 for 24 hours. After 24 hours, washing was avoided and the cells were treated with 10 μM DCFDA-H2 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in PBS for 15 minutes at 37°C. The plate was cooled to room temperature, and the fluorescence intensity was then measured by a FLUOstar OPTIMA at an excitation/emission of 485/515 nm, respectively, and images were also taken under an Olympus CX71 fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The cells were then collected to allow protein normalization. The fluorescence intensity was normalized by protein concentration and was expressed as the relative intensity compared to the control.

2.4. Cell Size Analysis

The cell surface area was determined by staining the cells with fluorophore-conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) [4, 29]. Briefly, H9C2 cells were seeded at a density of 10000 cells/plate in a 2 cm petri dish and left for 24 hours. The cells were incubated with or without 30 μM NaHS or 0.3 μM Na2Se for 30 minutes, washed with 1 ml PBS, and incubated with 200 μM H2O2 for 24 hours. After that, the cells were washed with 1 ml PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution for 15 minutes, followed by two rounds of washing with 1 ml PBS. The cells were then stained with 1 ng/ml WGA coupled with a fluorophore in PBS for 45 minutes in the dark at room temperature. The cells were washed 2 times with 1 ml PBS followed by staining with DAPI, before being visualized under an Olympus CX71 fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Seven images were taken from each plate of cells from different areas to avoid bias. A minimum of 50 cells were surveyed using ImageJ software to determine the cell surface area and were normalized by cell number. The cells incubated with 100 μM (±)-isoproterenol (ISO) for 24 hours acted as a positive control.

2.5. Measurement of Medium Se Level

H9C2 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and grown to 80% confluence. The cells were then incubated with or without 30 μM NaHS for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the cells and media were collected for protein normalization and Se analysis using 2,3-diaminonapthalene (DAN), respectively [30, 31]. A 300 μl aliquot of the media was sampled and oxidized with an equal amount of 0.2% HNO3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 15 minutes at 37°C. A 300 μl of 15 mM DAN prepared in 0.1 N HCl was then added to the mixture and incubated for 15 minutes at 37°C on a shaker to obtain Se-DAN complex. The Se-DAN complex was extracted with 500 μl cyclohexane, and the fluorescence intensity was measured in a clear F-bottom black 96-well plate using a FLUOstar OPTIMA at an excitation and emission of 385 and 515 nm, respectively. Fluorescence intensity was normalized by the amount of protein present per well and expressed relative to the control.

2.6. Measurement of GPx and TrxR Activities

To measure GPx activity, the cell lysates were incubated in 0.5 ml of a mixture containing 50 mm potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm NaN3, 10 mm GSH, and 2.4 units/ml glutathione reductase (GR) for 15 minutes. After addition of 10 μl of 5 mm NADPH for 5 minutes followed by the addition of 10 μl of 15 mm H2O2 for another 5 minutes, NADPH oxidation was then measured at 340 nm. The measured decrease in optical density at 340 nm was directly proportional to the enzyme activity in the sample. The assessment of TrxR activity was based on the enzymatic activity of TrxR to catalyze the reduction of 5,5-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic) acid with NADPH to 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid, which generates a strong yellow color with maximum absorbance at 412 nm. The activities of GPx and TrxR in the control sample were considered as 100%.

2.7. Western Blotting

After different treatments, cultured cells or mouse tissues were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and mixed in a lysis buffer (0.5 M EDTA, 1 M Tris-Cl at pH 7.4, and 0.3 M sucrose) in the presence of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for sonication. An equal amount of proteins (50 μg/well) was boiled in loading buffer for 5 minutes followed by separation by standard SDS/PAGE and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Pall Corporation, Pensacola, FL). Membranes were blocked with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 3% nonfat milk at room temperature for 2 hours, then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody on a shaker. The dilutions of primary antibodies were used as follows: SCLY (Abnova, Taipei, 1 : 1000), SePP1 (Boster, Pleasanton, CA, 1 : 1000), GPx1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, 1 : 200), TrxR2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1 : 200), and GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1 : 200). The membrane was then washed three times with TBS-Tween 20 (TBST) buffer and incubated in TBST solution with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted 1 : 5000) for 1 hour at room temperature on a shaker. Finally, the membrane was washed with TBST solution for 3 times. The immunoreactions were visualized with ECL (GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK) and exposed to X-ray film (Kodak Scientific Imaging film, Kodak, Rochester, NY).

The heart tissues were collected from 12-week-old CSE knockout mice and age-matched wild-type mice. All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996) and approved by the Animal Care Committee of Laurentian University, Canada.

2.8. Real-Time PCR

H9C2 cells were incubated with or without 30 μM NaHS or 0.3 μM Na2Se for 30 minutes, washed with 1 ml PBS, and incubated with 200 μM H2O2 for 24 hours. Total RNA from cells was isolated using Tri Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, the cells were sonicated in Tri Reagent, and total RNA was isolated using 200 μl chloroform pelleted with 500 μl isopropyl alcohol. The pellets were then washed with 100% ethanol and resuspended in RNase-free ddH2O. First strand cDNA was prepared by reverse transcriptase using a Maxima H Minus First Strand cDNA synthesis kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quantification of mRNA transcript levels was performed with an iCycler iQ5 apparatus (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, ON) using the iCycler optical system software (version 3.1) with SYBR Green. Relative mRNA quantification was determined using the arithmetic formula “2-ΔΔCT” where ΔCT is the difference between the threshold cycle of a given target cDNA and an endogenous reference of GAPDH gene [32]. The sequences of primers were used as follows: ANF (5-AGCGGGGGCGGCACTTA-3 and 5-GGGCTCCAATCCTGTCAATCCTAC-3), BNP (5-CCTAGCCAGTCTCCAGAACAATCC-3 and 5-CTAAAACAACCTCAGCCCGTCACA-3), GPx1 (5-GGTTTCCCGTGCAATCAGTTCG-3 and 5-GGCACACCGGGGACCAAATG-3), TrxR2 (5-TCCCCTCCCTCATCAGAAAACTCC-3 and 5-GGCCGCCCCTCAGCAACAT-3), SePP1 (5-GGTTTGCCCTACTCCTTCCTCACT-3 and 5-CACTTGCCCCCATGTCTCAGC-3), eEFSec (5-ATGGGCCGTATGCTGTTCTTC-3 and 5-CAGCCGGCATGTGTTGGTGTGA-3), glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit (GCLM, 5-CGCCTGCGGAAAAAGTG-3 and 5-GAGGGGAAGCCATGATGACAGAGT-3), NDQ1 (5-TGATTGTATTGGCCCACGCAGAG-3 and 5-GGCACCCCAAACCAATACAATG-3), HO-1 (5-CCCCCGAGGTCAAGCACAG-3 and 5-CACGGTCGCCAACAGGAAACT-3), and GAPDH (5-CACGGCAAGTTCAACGGCACAGT-3 and 5-AGCGGAAGGGGCGGAGATGAT-3). All PCRs were performed in a volume of 20 μl, including 2 μl cDNA, 1 μl each primer (1 μM), 10 μl SYBR Green PCR Master Mix, and 6 μl nuclease-free water. The cycling was conducted at 95°C for 90 seconds followed by 38 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds and at 60°C for 20 seconds. A standard melting curve analysis was performed at 95°C for 10 seconds followed at 55°C for 15 seconds and ramping to 95°C at 1° increments to confirm the absence of primer dimers.

2.9. Reagents

Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were purchased from Sigma (Oakville, ON) with the highest quality. All solutions were prepared in ddH2O, and all cellular incubation was performed in standard media unless stated.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as , representing at least 3 independent experiments. Statistical comparisons were made using Student’s -tests or one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc analysis (Tukey test) where applicable. Values of were considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. H2S and H2Se Reverse H2O2-Induced Cell Death

H9C2 cells treated with NaHS (1-1000 μM) for 24 hours exhibited no change in cell viability (Figure 1(a)). A similar effect was viewed with cells treated by Na2Se (0-0.3 μM) for 24 hours, while the signs of cellular toxicity started to appear at 3 μM (Figure 1(b)). The cells treated with H2O2 exhibit significantly lower viability at 800 μM and higher (Figure 1(c)). Pretreatment with NaHS (30 μM) or Na2Se (0.3 μM) for 30 minutes markedly reversed H2O2 (800 μM)-induced cell death (Figure 1(c)), while NaHS or Na2Se did not reverse the higher dose of H2O2 (1000 μM)-inhibited cell viability. Although H2O2 at a lower dose (100-400 μM) did not cause cell death, coincubation of H2O2 with NaHS (30 μM) or Na2Se (0.3 μM) significantly stimulated cell growth.

3.2. H2S and H2Se Reverse H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress and Cardiac Hypertrophy

H9C2 cells treated with 200 μM H2O2 showed increased signs of oxidative stress after 24 hours (Figure 2(a)), and internal ROS levels were increased 2.4-fold (Figure 2(b)). Pretreatment with H2S or H2Se significantly abolished the stimulatory role of H2O2-induced oxidative stress, while H2S or H2Se alone had no effect on the ROS level. We further observed that the cells treated with H2O2 (200 μM) for 24 hours had a 2-fold increase in cell size when compared to control cells (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Pretreatment with either H2S or H2Se normalized cell size where H2S/H2Se itself had no effect. An increase in hypertrophy marker genes BNP (Figure 3(c)) and ANF (Figure 3(d)) was also observed in the cells treated with H2O2, which were partially reversed by coincubation with H2Se. ISO, a well-known inducer for heart cell hypertrophy, acted as a positive control here and also increased the cell surface area.

3.3. H2S Induces SLCY/H2Se Signaling

To explore the interaction of H2S and H2Se, we first investigated the protein expression of SLCY in heart tissues from 12-week-old CSE knockout mice in comparison with age-matched wild-type mice. Lack of CSE expression and significantly lower production of endogenous H2S have been observed in the hearts of CSE knockout mice [8, 33]. The protein expression of SCLY was much lower in the heart tissue from CSE knockout mice, indicating the potential of H2S in regulating the contents of H2Se and intracellular Sec (Figure 4(a)). We then incubated H9C2 cells with 30 μM NaHS for 24 hours to detect the change of SCLY protein expression. It was found that H2S also stimulated SCLY protein (Figure 4(b)). Moreover, extracellular selenium levels were also significantly higher after the cells were treated with H2S for 24 hours (Figure 4(c)). To investigate the direct effect of selenide on selenoprotein synthesis, we incubated cells with or without selenide washout for 1-3 days. As shown in Figure 4(d), Na2Se supplement induced the protein expressions of GPx1 and TrxR1 at day 1, which were not affected by either washout of selenide after 30 mins or continuous exposure to selenide. At day 3, GPx1 expression was further increased by continuous exposure of selenide but had a slight decrease after selenide washout after 30 mins. On the contrary, at day 3, the expression of TrxR1 had a slow drop by continuous exposure of selenide but kept higher after selenide washout. These data suggest that selenoprotein synthesis can be stimulated by the presence of either short-term (30 mins) or long-term (up to 3 days) incubation with selenide.

3.4. H2S Stimulates the Expressions and Activities of Selenoproteins

H9C2 cells treated with H2O2 for 24 hours had a significant 5-fold increase in GPx1 expression, which was normalized by H2S pretreatment (Figure 5(a)). eEFSec expression was reduced 2-fold by H2O2 treatment and restored with H2S pretreatment, while H2S alone had no effect (Figure 5(b)). TrxR2 was unchanged by H2O2 treatment; however, H2S increased TrxR2 expression both in the presence and absence of H2O2 (Figure 5(c)). SePP1 expression was significantly increased 1.5-fold by H2O2 and further increased 3-fold by H2S alone. H2S and H2O2 resulted in the same increase of SePP1 expression as did by H2O2 (Figure 5(d)). We also observed that the protein expression of SePP1 was significantly lower in the heart tissues from CSE knockout mice when compared with that from wild-type littermates (Figure 5(e)). In addition, NaHS/Na2Se enhanced the activities of both GPx and TrxR no matter the presence or absence of H2O2 (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Nrf2 is a master transcription factor driving the transcription of a large amount of antioxidant genes. We further validated that H2S or H2Se induced the mRNA expressions of classical Nrf2-target genes, including GLCM, NDQ1, and HO-1 (Figures 7(a)-7(c)), which provide additional protection against oxidative stress-caused cell hypertrophy.

4. Discussion

Lower doses of ROS usually contribute to chronic stress eventually leading to cellular apoptosis through metabolic starvation, while higher doses of ROS can lead to significant cell death within a short period of time [1]. A major finding of this study is that pretreatment with 30 μM H2S or 0.3 μM H2Se protects H9C2 cardiac cells from higher doses of H2O2 (800 μM)-induced cellular death. We also observed that H2S or H2Se protects lower doses of H2O2 (200 μM)-induced oxidative stress and cell hypertrophy by regulation of selenoproteins, a group of antioxidant proteins.

There is increasing evidence of H2S’s ability to prevent cardiac hypertrophy at the physiologically relevant concentration [4, 5, 29, 34]. The potential of selenium in proper cardiac protection is not fully clear [35]. We report here for the first time the ability of pretreatment with H2Se to provide a protective effect against H2O2-induced cardiac cell hypertrophy. H2Se shared near identical results in terms of cell viability (Figure 1), ROS levels (Figure 2), and similar effects on ANF/BNP expression (Figure 3) as those previously reported for H2S [5, 34]. This provides strong evidence that H2Se is likely a downstream effect of H2S, or that H2Se may act in a similar fashion as a gasotransmitter, and that H2S and H2Se likely share some interactions and regulatory elements.

From the similarities between H2S and H2Se systems discussed above, we hypothesized that both systems would play a role in the regulation of one another. We demonstrated that heart tissue from CSE knockout mice had decreased protein expression of SCLY and SePP1 (Figures 4(a) and 5(e)), two enzymes crucial for intracellular H2Se production [36, 37]. A similar relationship was observed in H9C2 cells that treatment with H2S induced protein expression of SCLY and increased mRNA expression of SePP1. This provides evidence of the direct role of H2S in stimulating H2Se production within cardiac cells, which acts as the central metabolite for all selenoprotein synthesis. Treatment with H2S increased the concentration of selenium in the cultured medium as well as the activities of two selenoproteins, GPx and TrxR (Figure 4(c) and Figure 6), which indicates an increase in the bioavailability of H2Se. Similar to H2S, H2Se can diffuse freely through the cell membrane as it is a small uncharged molecule, follows concentration gradients, and is therefore likely responsible for this increase in its extracellular concentration. The increase in bioavailable H2Se can be used for further selenocysteine synthesis and thus selenoprotein translation such as SePP1 to increase selenocysteine distribution and storage [38]. Due to the higher lipid solubility of H2Se, short-term (30 minutes) incubation of the cells with selenide is able to induce the protein expression of selenoproteins over 3 days (Figure 4(d)).

Although it seems redundant to increase SCLY and SePP1 expression as the former degrades the latter, this can be explained through the localization of SePP1 in tissue [37]. H2S-producing genes and SePP1 are highly expressed in the heart and liver tissue as these organs appear to be the primary mode of selenium metabolism and storage [25, 39]. Higher levels of H2S increase SePP1 expression leading to a better distribution of SePP1 across an organism and yielding higher selenium content in plasma. As SePP1 levels increase in the plasma, it is likely that SePP1 will be selectively transported into tissues which require high levels of selenium for oxidative stress defence, such as neuronal tissues [23, 36, 38]. SePP1 has been shown to be selectively uptaken into neuronal tissue through apolipoprotein receptor following degradation by SCLY [23, 36]. This mode of transportation has been shown to be critical as the absence of SePP1 has been linked to severe neurological disorders, likely due to the diminished levels of selenium in the brain [23, 36]. The observed increased SePP1 expression caused by higher levels of H2S may be part of the whole organism’s protective effect. Tissues high in selenium levels and SePP1 expression may be responsible for increasing the transportation of selenium to SePP1-dependent tissues, to “prime” their antioxidant defence systems upon detecting stressful conditions. Therefore, this increase in SePP1 may not be plausible at the cellular level but only at the tissue level which requires more research and investigation to confirm.

We also demonstrated that treatment with H2S and H2Se can reverse H2O2-induced oxidative stress, possibly through the regulation of selenoproteins, such as GPx1 and TrxR2. GPx1 expression is induced in response to high ROS levels causing changes in redox signaling, to attenuate ROS levels [40]. Here, we showed that H2O2 activates GPx1 mRNA expression, which is normalized by pretreatment with H2S (Figure 5(a)), indicating the increase in GPx1 as an adaptive response. TrxR2 mRNA expression was not affected by H2O2 but slightly increased by H2S. TrxR2 is an essential component of redox signaling, and therefore, its increase in mRNA expression with H2S likely acts as an upstream regulator of the observed protective effect. Previous studies have shown that H2S can also regulate cell processes that can effect redox signaling, in addition to directly regulating redox proteins themselves [34]. One possible mechanism of H2S regulating TrxR2 is through thyroid metabolism. Thyroid metabolism plays a key role in regulating cardiac health through thyroid hormone deiodinases which are also Sec containing proteins themselves [16, 41]. It is possible that H2S plays a role in regulating deiodinases through transcription or posttranslational modification followed by increased TrxR2 expression. A second mechanism of TrxR2 regulation could be contributed to H2Se through H2S activation. Stimulation of H2Se may enhance TrxR2 transcription through higher bioavailability of Se. H2Se may also function as a gasotransmitter like H2S, acting through a posttranslational modification of proteins [1315]. H2Se is known to be heavily involved in the mitochondria in relation to ROS; therefore, it is possible that H2Se has an observable effect on TrxR2 regulation, through posttranslational modification, transcription activation, or redox signaling [42]. There are at least two types of TrxR, including TrxR1 and TrxR2. TrxR2, a mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase, plays a pivotal role in heart development. Heart-specific inactivation of TrxR2 results in fatal dilated cardiomyopathy, a condition reminiscent of that in Keshan disease [43]. However, the mice with a heart-restricted inactivation of TrxR1, the dominant cytosolic enzyme, develop normally and appear healthy [44]. These evidences strongly suggest the importance of TrxR2 but not TrxR1 in heart functions. Regardless the method of regulation, we provide clear evidence that H2S plays a regulatory role in TrxR2 and GPx1 expression/activity followed by a reduced ROS level and cell hypertrophy. Perhaps, even some functions of H2Se have been currently contributed to H2S. Further studies regarding the mechanistic regulation of TrxR2 and GPx1 via H2S and potentially H2Se must be considered.

Selenoprotein translation requires the SECIS region in the 3UTR of the mRNA. Many studies have shown that the SECIS differs by selenoprotein, creating a hierarchy of expression and regulatory function [45]. eEFSec is a key factor for selenoprotein synthesis. While this study showed no change in eEFSec mRNA expression by H2S, excluding the possibility of H2S regulation of selenoprotein translation, it is also possible that H2S may posttranslationally modify eEFSec by S-sulfhydration, which would enhance eEFSec activity leading to higher selenoprotein translation [39]. This hypothesis needs to be tested in the future study. Besides enhanced selenoprotein synthesis, H2S/H2Se is also found to strengthen the transcriptions of a group of Nrf2-target antioxidant genes, including GCLM, NDQ1, and HO-1, suggesting that H2S or H2Se can protect the cardiomyocytes from oxidative stress-induced damage through multiple pathways [14, 46, 47].

In conclusion, exogenous H2S stimulates SCLY protein expression and induces an increase of bioavailable Se content in H9C2 cells, and deficiency of CSE leads to a lower expression of SCLY and SePP1 expression in mouse heart tissue. Pretreatment with H2S or H2Se provides a protective effect against H2O2-induced oxidative stress, cell death, and cardiac hypertrophy. Mechanically, H2S would alter the expressions of selenoproteins by changing the SCLY/H2Se system and also enhance the transcriptions of Nrf2-targeted genes (Figure 8). Both H2S and H2Se signaling can be a target for therapeutic treatment of heart disorders.


3MST:3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase
ANF:Atrial natriuretic factor
BNP:Brain natriuretic peptide
CBS:Cystathionine beta-synthase
CSE:Cystathionine gamma-lyase
CVD:Cardiovascular disease
eEFSec:Eukaryotic elongation factor selenocysteine
GLCM:Glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit
GPx:Glutathione peroxidase
GR:Glutathione reductase
H2S:Hydrogen sulfide
H2Se:Hydrogen selenide
MTT:3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
NaHS:Sodium hydrosulfide
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
SCLY:Selenocysteine lyase
SECIS:Selenocysteine insertion sequence
SePP1:Selenoprotein P
TrxR:Thioredoxin reductase
WGA:Wheat germ agglutinin

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.


A part of this study has been presented at the 47th Southern Ontario Undergraduate Student Chemistry Conference, Toronto, on March 30, 2019.

Conflicts of Interest

No competing financial interest exists.


This study was supported by a discovery grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (#04051) and grant-in-aid from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (#G-18-0022098).


  1. I. Shimizu and T. Minamino, “Physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 97, pp. 245–262, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. Oyama, K. Takahashi, and K. Sakurai, “Cardiomyocyte H9C2 cells exhibit differential sensitivity to intracellular reactive oxygen species generation with regard to their hypertrophic vs death responses to exogenously added hydrogen peroxide,” Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 361–369, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. K. Somvanshi, X. Qiu, and U. Kumar, “Isoproterenol induced hypertrophy and associated signaling pathways are modulated by somatostatin in H9C2 cells,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 1012–1022, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Huang, D. Wang, J. Zheng, X. Huang, and H. Jin, “Hydrogen sulfide attenuates cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis induced by abdominal aortic coarctation in rats,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 923–928, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Shao, C. Zhuo, R. Jiang et al., “Protective effect of hydrogen sulphide against myocardial hypertrophy in mice,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 22344–22352, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. Wang, “Two’s company, three’s a crowd: can H2S be the third endogenous gaseous transmitter?” The FASEB Journal, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 1792–1798, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. Zhao, J. Zhang, Y. Lu, and R. Wang, “The vasorelaxant effect of H2S as a novel endogenous gaseous KATP channel opener,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 6008–6016, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. Yang, L. Wu, B. Jiang et al., “H2S as a physiologic vasorelaxant: hypertension in mice with deletion of cystathionine gamma-lyase,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5901, pp. 587–590, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Leslie, “Medicine: nothing rotten about hydrogen sulfide’s medical promise,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5880, pp. 1155–1157, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Wang, “Physiological implications of hydrogen sulfide: a whiff exploration that blossomed,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 791–896, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. U. Sen, P. B. Sathnur, S. Kundu et al., “Increased endogenous H2S generation by CBS, CSE, and 3MST gene therapy improves ex vivo renovascular relaxation in hyperhomocysteinemia,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 303, no. 1, pp. C41–C51, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. K. Mustafa, G. Sikka, S. K. Gazi et al., “Hydrogen sulfide as endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor sulfhydrates potassium channels,” Circulation Research, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 1259–1268, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Sen, “Functional and molecular insights of hydrogen sulfide signaling and protein sulfhydration,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 429, no. 4, pp. 543–561, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Yang, K. Zhao, Y. Ju et al., “Hydrogen sulfide protects against cellular senescence via S-sulfhydration of Keap1 and activation of Nrf2,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 1906–1919, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Ju, A. Untereiner, L. Wu, and G. Yang, “H2S-induced S-sulfhydration of pyruvate carboxylase contributes to gluconeogenesis in liver cells,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1850, no. 11, pp. 2293–2303, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Benstoem, A. Goetzenich, S. Kraemer et al., “Selenium and its supplementation in cardiovascular disease—what do we know?” Nutrients, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 3094–3118, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Oropeza-Moe, H. Wisløff, and A. Bernhoft, “Selenium deficiency associated porcine and human cardiomyopathies,” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, vol. 31, pp. 148–156, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. P. Burke and K. Opeskin, “Fulminant heart failure due to selenium deficiency cardiomyopathy (Keshan disease),” Medicine, Science and the Law, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 10–13, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. L. Hatfield, P. A. Tsuji, B. A. Carlson, and V. N. Gladyshev, “Selenium and selenocysteine: roles in cancer, health, and development,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 112–120, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Swart, A. E. Schutte, J. M. van Rooyen, and C. M. C. Mels, “Serum selenium levels, the selenoprotein glutathione peroxidase and vascular protection: the SABPA study,” Food Research International, vol. 104, pp. 69–76, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. V. M. Labunskyy, D. L. Hatfield, and V. N. Gladyshev, “Selenoproteins: molecular pathways and physiological roles,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 739–777, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. R. Gasdaska, J. W. Harney, P. Y. Gasdaska, G. Powis, and M. J. Berry, “Regulation of human thioredoxin reductase expression and activity by 3'-untranslated region selenocysteine insertion sequence and mRNA instability elements,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 36, pp. 25379–25385, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. F. Burk and K. E. Hill, “Selenoprotein p-expression, functions, and roles in mammals,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1790, no. 11, pp. 1441–1447, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Johansson, G. Gafvelin, and E. S. J. Arnér, “Selenocysteine in proteins-properties and biotechnological use,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1726, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. N. Esaki, T. Nakamura, H. Tanaka, and K. Soda, “Selenocysteine lyase, a novel enzyme that specifically acts on selenocysteine. Mammalian distribution and purification and properties of pig liver enzyme,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 257, no. 8, pp. 4386–4391, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  26. C. Bourque, Y. Zhang, M. Fu et al., “H2S protects lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation by blocking NFκB transactivation in endothelial cells,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 338, pp. 20–29, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Yang and S. Li, “Dandelion extracts protect human skin fibroblasts from UVB damage and cellular senescence,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 619560, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Racine, M. Fu, T. Shuang et al., “Reversal of Sp1 transactivation and TGFβ1/SMAD1 signaling by H2S prevent nickel-induced fibroblast activation,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 356, pp. 25–35, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. F. Lu, J. Xing, X. Zhang et al., “Exogenous hydrogen sulfide prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis from cardiac hypertrophy induced by isoproterenol,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 381, no. 1-2, pp. 41–50, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. W. Chen, L. Li, A. D’Ulivo, and N. Belzile, “Extraction and determination of elemental selenium in sediments--a comparative study,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 577, no. 1, pp. 126–133, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Cheng, F. Kong, L. Tong, X. Liu, K. Xu, and B. Tang, “Simultaneous detection of mitochondrial hydrogen selenide and superoxide anion in HepG2 cells under hypoxic conditions,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 13, pp. 8116–8122, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. Yang, K. Cao, L. Wu, and R. Wang, “Cystathionine γ-lyase overexpression inhibits cell proliferation via a H2S-dependent modulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation and p21Cip/WAK-1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 47, pp. 49199–49205, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Mani, H. Li, A. Untereiner et al., “Decreased endogenous production of hydrogen sulfide accelerates atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 127, no. 25, pp. 2523–2534, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Zhang, J. Yu, Y. Chen et al., “Exogenous hydrogen sulfide supplement attenuates isoproterenol-induced myocardial hypertrophy in a sirtuin 3-dependent manner,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 9396089, 17 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Tanguy, S. Morel, C. Berthonneche et al., “Preischemic selenium status as a major determinant of myocardial infarct size in vivo in rats,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 792–796, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. N. Byrns, M. W. Pitts, C. A. Gilman, A. C. Hashimoto, and M. J. Berry, “Mice lacking selenoprotein P and selenocysteine lyase exhibit severe neurological dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and audiogenic seizures,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 14, pp. 9662–9674, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. A. Seale, H. Y. Ha, A. C. Hashimoto, and M. J. Berry, “Relationship between selenoprotein P and selenocysteine lyase: insights into selenium metabolism,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 127, pp. 182–189, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. V. Raman, M. W. Pitts, A. Seyedali et al., “Absence of selenoprotein P but not selenocysteine lyase results in severe neurological dysfunction,” Genes, Brain and Behavior, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 601–613, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. K. Mustafa, M. M. Gadalla, N. Sen et al., “H2S signals through protein S-sulfhydration,” Science Signaling, vol. 2, no. 96, p. ra72, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Lubos, J. Loscalzo, and D. E. Handy, “Glutathione peroxidase-1 in health and disease: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1957–1997, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. F. Saccoccia, F. Angelucci, G. Boumis et al., “Thioredoxin reductase and its inhibitors,” Current Protein & Peptide Science, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 621–646, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. Mustacich and G. Powis, “Thioredoxin reductase,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 346, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Conrad, C. Jakupoglu, S. G. Moreno et al., “Essential role for mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in hematopoiesis, heart development, and heart function,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 21, pp. 9414–9423, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. Jakupoglu, G. K. H. Przemeck, M. Schneider et al., “Cytoplasmic thioredoxin reductase is essential for embryogenesis but dispensable for cardiac development,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1980–1988, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Dobosz-Bartoszek, M. H. Pinkerton, Z. Otwinowski et al., “Crystal structures of the human elongation factor EEFSec suggest a non-canonical mechanism for selenocysteine incorporation,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, article 12941, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. Aghagolzadeh, R. Radpour, M. Bachtler et al., “Hydrogen sulfide attenuates calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells via KEAP1/NRF2/NQO1 activation,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 265, pp. 78–86, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Y. Shimizu, C. K. Nicholson, J. P. Lambert et al., “Sodium sulfide attenuates ischemic-induced heart failure by enhancing proteasomal function in an Nrf2-dependent manner,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 9, no. 4, article e002368, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Adam Greasley et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

647 Views | 321 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.