Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8340695 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8340695

So-Hyun Park, Hyun-Il Choi, Jiyun Ahn, Young-Jin Jang, Tae-Youl Ha, Hyo-Deok Seo, Yoon-Sook Kim, Dae-Hee Lee, Chang Hwa Jung, "Autophagy Functions to Prevent Methylglyoxal-Induced Apoptosis in HK-2 Cells", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, Article ID 8340695, 11 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8340695

Autophagy Functions to Prevent Methylglyoxal-Induced Apoptosis in HK-2 Cells

Academic Editor: Rodrigo Franco
Received26 Feb 2020
Revised14 Apr 2020
Accepted25 Apr 2020
Published04 Jun 2020

Abstract

Methylglyoxal (MGO), a reactive carbonyl species, causes cellular damage and is closely related to kidney disease, particularly diabetic nephropathy. Although MGO has been reported to induce autophagy and apoptosis, the relationships between the two pathways are unclear. Here, we evaluated whether autophagy may be the underlying mechanism inhibiting MGO-induced apoptosis. MGO treatment induced concentration- and time-dependent apoptosis in HK-2 cells. Moreover, MGO upregulated the autophagy markers p62 and LC3-II. Apoptosis caused by MGO was increased in ATG5-knockdown cells compared to that in wild-type cells. In contrast, autophagy activation by 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide resulted in reduced apoptosis, suggesting that autophagy played a role in protecting against MGO-induced cell death. To examine the mechanisms through which autophagy occurred following MGO stimulation, we investigated changes in AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Autophagy induction by MGO treatment was not related to AKT/mTOR signaling; however, it did involve autophagy-related gene expression promoted by AMP-activated protein kinase-mediated transcription factors, such as forkhead box 1. Overall, our findings indicate that MGO-induced cellular damage can be mitigated by autophagy, suggesting that autophagy may be a potential therapeutic target for diseases such as diabetic nephropathy.

1. Introduction

Methylglyoxal (MGO), a reactive carbonyl species, is formed in the glycolytic pathway following fragmentation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate [1]. MGO is a major precursor of advanced glycation end products and can induce intracellular damage by increasing reactive oxygen species levels and mitochondrial damage, leading to apoptosis [24]. According to previous studies, MGO is produced rapidly under hyperglycemic conditions in diabetic patients, and accumulated MGO is then involved in several diseases, such as cognitive dysfunction, cardiovascular diseases, and bone loss [510]. In particular, MGO contributes to the development of diabetic microvascular complications, such as nephropathy and retinopathy [1113]. Although a recent study revealed that MGO is related to the early progression of diabetic nephropathy, the molecular mechanisms of the cytotoxic effects of MGO in kidney cells remain unclear [14].

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation mechanism that targets damaged organelles, lipids, and aggregated proteins [15]. Importantly, autophagy has critical roles in cell survival and cell death responses to intracellular stress. Indeed, previous studies have shown that autophagy alleviates cell death in a variety of stress environments, including starvation, oxidative stress, and DNA damage [1618]. Additionally, autophagy inducers, such as 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR) and rapamycin, also block various stress-induced cell death pathways, suggesting a correlation between MGO-induced autophagy and apoptosis [19, 20]. Autophagy activation in human brain microvascular epidermal cells protects against MGO-induced cell damage [21]. Luteolin, a type of phytochemical flavonoid, also inhibits cell death in MGO-treated cells by blocking mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling [22]. However, the effects of autophagy in MGO-induced apoptosis and its associated mechanisms have not been fully elucidated in kidney cells.

Accordingly, in this study, we investigated whether autophagy had protective effects against MGO-induced apoptosis and examined the mechanisms through which autophagy was caused by MGO.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Human kidney (HK-2) and SV40MES13 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). HK-2 cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS). SV40MES13 cells were cultured in a 3 : 1 mixture of DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 5% FBS, 14 mM of HEPES, and 1% PS at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

2.2. Cell Viability

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of cells/well in 100 μL complete medium and incubated for 24 h. The cells were treated with various concentrations (0–1 mM) of MGO with 100 μL complete medium for 24 or 48 h. Following treatment, 20 μL MTT solution (5 mg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline) was added to each well, and cells were incubated for an additional 2 h. Next, the medium was removed, and 200 μL dimethyl sulfoxide was added to each well. The cell viability was determined by measuring absorbance at 540 nm using an Infinite M200 microplate reader (Tecan US, Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA).

2.3. Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) Assay

Apoptotic cells were detected using a DeadEnd Fluorometric TUNEL System kit (cat. no. G3250; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apoptotic cells were imaged using a fluorescent microscope (Olympus IX71, Japan).

2.4. Annexin V and Dead Cell Assays

The apoptotic cell death ratio was determined using a Muse Annexin V and Dead Cell Assay Kit (cat. no. MCH100105; Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Briefly, HK-2 cells were seeded into 6-well plates ( cells/well). After 24 h, cells were treated with 0.5 or 0.75 mM MGO for 24 h. After treatment, all cells were harvested and stained with annexin V solution for 20 min. Apoptotic cell death was measured using a MUSE cell analyzer (Merck Millipore).

2.5. Immunoblotting

Cellular proteins were harvested using cell lysis buffer (cat. no. 9803S; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The harvested cells were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were separated. The proteins were quantified using Bradford assays and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were then blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti-phospho-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK; Thr172; cat. no. 2535; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-AMPK (cat. no. 2793; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B light chain 3B (LC3B; cat. no. 2775; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phospho-ribosomal protein S6 kinase β-1 (S6K1; Thr389; cat. no. 9234; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-S6K1 (cat. no. 9202; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP; cat. no. 9542; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p62/SQSTM-1 (cat. no. P0067; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-Atg5 (cat. no. NB110-53818; Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), anti-Caspase-3 (cat. no. 9662; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (cat. no. sc-365062; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Cytochrome C (cat. no. sc-13156, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-β-actin (cat. no. sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The next day, the membranes were washed and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized using G:BOX Chemi XX6 (Syngene Ltd., Frederick, MD, USA) with an enhanced chemiluminescence substrate. The intensities of the protein bands were measured using ImageJ software ver. 1.8 (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA).

2.6. Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed using a RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was then performed using the SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (Toyobo Co., Ltd.) with a Viia 7 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative RNA levels were normalized according to the levels of actin mRNA. The specific primer sequences are listed in Table 1.


DNA targetSequence (5 to 3)

MAP1LC3BFGATGTCCGACTTATTCGAGAGC
RTTGAGCTGTAAGCGCCTTCTA

BECN11FCCATGCAGGTGAGCTTCGT
RGAATCTGCGAGAGACACCATC

FOXO3FCGGACAAACGGCTCACTCT
RGGACCCGCATGAATCGACTAT

TFE3FCCGTGTTCGTGCTGTTGGA
RGCTCGTAGAAGCTGTCAGGAT

TFEBFACCTGTCCGAGACCTATGGG
RCGTCCAGACGCATAATGTTGTC

FOXO1FTCGTCATAATCTGTCCCTACACA
RCGGCTTCGGCTCTTAGCAAA

CREBFTCAGCCGGGTACTACCATTC
RTCTCTTGCTGCTTCCCTGTT

GABARABFAGAAGAGCATCCGTTCGAGAA
RCCAGGTCTCCTATCCGAGCTT

ATG16LFAACGCTGTGCAGTTCAGTCC
RAGCTGCTAAGAGGTAAGATCCA

BNIP3FCAGGGCTCCTGGGTAGAACT
RCTACTCCGTCCAGACTCATGC

ACTINFCATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC
RCTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT

AMPKαFTTG AAA CCT GAA AAT GTC CTG CT
RGGT GAG CCA CAA CTT GTT CTT

ATG5FTGTGCTTCGAGATGTGTGGTT
RGTCAAATAGCTGACTCTTGGCAA

ATG12FTAGAGCAACACGAACCATCC
RCACTGCCAAAACACTCATAGAGA

p62/SQSTM-1FGACTACGACTTGTGTAGCCTC
RAGTGTCCGTGTTTCACCTTCC

2.7. Immunofluorescence

HK-2 cells were seeded into 8-well chamber slides ( cells/well). After 24 h, cells were treated with MGO. Immunostaining was performed as previously described [23]. Briefly, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 15 min and permeabilized with 0.05% saponin for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin blocking solution and reacted with anti-LC3B antibody (cat. no. 2775; Cell Signaling Technology) overnight at 4°C. The next day, cells were washed thrice and stained with rabbit secondary antibody (cat. no. 4412; Cell Signaling Technology). After 30 min, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated with DAPI solution (cat. no. 10236276001; Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min. Microscopy was performed at 408 nm (46-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and 488 nm (fluorescein isothiocyanate) using an Eclipse Ti confocal fluorescent microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. siRNA Transfection

siRNAs targeting Atg5 and AMPKα and nontargeted siRNA (siNC) were purchased from Dharmacon (CO, USA). HK-2 cells were seeded into 6-well plates ( cells/well) and incubated until at least 60% confluence was attained. The cells were transfected with siAtg5 or siAMPK or siNC using Lipofectamine RNAi Max (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. siRNA was added to Opti-MEM with a transfection reagent and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was then added to each well, and the cells were incubated for an additional 24 h. After transfection, cells were harvested and used for subsequent experiments.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as . The significance of differences was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences with values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. MGO Treatment Induced Apoptosis in HK-2 Cells

MGO is known to induce cell death and suppress cell proliferation [24, 25]. Therefore, we first evaluated the appropriate concentration of MGO for reducing cell viability in HK-2 cells using MTT assays with various concentrations of MGO. The results showed that MGO decreased cell viability in a concentration- and time-dependent manner and significantly induced cell death following treatment with MGO for 24 h at a concentration above 0.5 mM (Figure 1(a), Figure S1(a)). We then confirmed the apoptosis-inducing concentration (0.75 mM) using TUNEL assays, showing increased formation of green dots representing DNA fragmentation (Figure 1(b)). Muse Annexin V and Dead Cell Assays showed that the proportion of apoptotic cells was significantly increased following treatment with 0.75 mM MGO; however, the increase in necrotic cell death was not significant (Figures 1(c)1(e)). These results indicate that treatment with 0.75 mM MGO for 24 h in HK-2 cells induced apoptosis in approximately 40% of the cells.

3.2. MGO Treatment Induced Autophagy

According to recent reports, MGO increases autophagy in cells [25, 26]. Therefore, we next investigated whether autophagy occurs at apoptosis-inducing MGO concentrations. Autophagy protein markers, such as p62/SQSTM-1 and LC3-II, were increased in a concentration-dependent manner following treatment with MGO (Figure 2(a)). In general, when autophagy is activated, LC3-II protein expression is increased while the expression of p62/SQSTM-1 is decreased [27]. Alternatively, the inhibition of autophagy flux can induce the accumulation of p62/SQSTM-1. We, therefore, sought to evaluate autophagy flux using bafilomycin A1 (baf), an autophagosome-lysosome fusion inhibitor, and found that MGO significantly increased protein levels of LC3 over 1–4 h, and the accumulation of LC3 induced by baf was increased in MGO-treated cells compared with that in baf control cells, similarly to what was observed for torin 1 (autophagy activator, positive control) (Figure 2(b)). In addition, our data showed that MGO enhanced p62/SQSTM-1 mRNA (Figure 2(c)), suggesting that MGO activated autophagy flux, and the autophagy enhancement was associated with p62/SQSTM-1 mRNA expression. Moreover, the numbers of autophagosome puncta in MGO-treated cells was increased compared with that in the control group (Figures 2(d) and 2(e)). Collectively, our results suggested that MGO enhanced autophagy in HK-2 cells and increased the expression of autophagy-related gene.

3.3. Autophagy Had Protective Effects against MGO-Induced Apoptosis

Autophagy can induce autophagic cell death [28]. Therefore, we verified whether MGO-activated autophagy induces cell death or protects damaged cells. To confirm the role of autophagy in MGO-treated cells, we transfected them with Atg5 siRNA, a key subunit involved in autophagosome formation, and measured cell viability using MTT assays [29]. The viability of MGO-treated siAtg5 cells was found to be significantly lower than that of control cells (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Moreover, MGO increased the levels of apoptosis marker proteins, such as PARP, caspase-3, and cytochrome C, in siATG5 cells compared with their levels in siNC cells, suggesting that autophagy may protect cells from MGO-induced cell death (Figure 3(c)). Interestingly, MGO also increased Atg5 protein expression in both siAtg5 and siNC cells, suggesting that MGO contributes to the upregulation of autophagy-related proteins, such as p62 and Atg5. We next analyzed the percentage of apoptotic cells in siAtg5 cells treated with MGO and found that cell viability was decreased by approximately 15% compared with that of siNC cells. Additionally, the percentage of apoptotic cells among siAtg5 cells treated with MGO was approximately 12% higher than that among siNC cells (Figures 3(d) and 3(e)). We then investigated whether autophagy-activating drugs can reduce MGO-induced apoptosis. To this end, we treated cells with AICAR, an autophagy activator that acts via AMPK activation, along with MGO and found that AICAR significantly suppressed MGO-induced apoptosis (Figure 3(f)). Treatment with AICAR has been shown to further increase autophagy flux, and this suggests that increasing autophagy activity may reduce MGO-induced cell death (Figure 3(g)). Taken together, these results suggest that MGO-induced autophagy does not contribute to apoptosis, but rather protects against cell death.

3.4. MGO-Induced Autophagy Occurred via AMPK Independent of the mTOR Complex 1 (mTORC1) Pathway

MGO has been reported to act as an AMPK activator [26]. In this study, we confirmed that AMPK phosphorylation was increased in a concentration-dependent manner following MGO treatment (Figure 4(a), Figure S2). Interestingly, MGO also increased the expression of p-S6K1, an mTOR signaling protein. Since the mTOR pathway negatively regulates autophagy [30], it is necessary to confirm the effect of MGO on mTOR signaling. To this end, we treated HK-2 cells with insulin (mTOR signaling inducer) and MGO in serum-free conditions. Insulin treatment stimulated the phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473 and S6K1 at Ser389, which indicates the activation of mTORC1 signaling without altering the LC3 protein level. Alternatively, MGO treatment not only activated the phosphorylation of AKT and S6K1, but also increased LC3-II expression (Figure 4(b)). Taken together, these results suggest that MGO activated both autophagy and mTOR signaling and that autophagy is activated through an mTOR-independent pathway.

3.5. MGO Increased the Expression of Autophagy-Related Transcription Factors by Enhancing AMPK Activity

Another pathway for increasing autophagy may be transcription factor regulation. Activated AMPK regulates the forkhead box (FOXO) family of transcription factors [31]. Therefore, we analyzed mRNA levels of autophagy-related transcription factors, such as FOXO1, FOXO3, transcription factor EB (TFEB), transcription factor II E (TFE), and cAMP response element-binding protein [32]. FOXO1 and FOXO3 were significantly increased by MGO treatment (Figure 5(a)). Next, autophagy-related genes, such as Atg12, BNIP3, Beclin1, GABARAP, Atg16, and Atg7, which are transcriptionally regulated by FOXOs, were analyzed. MGO increased the expression of most autophagy genes, except BNIP3 (Figure 5(b)). To verify the influence of activated AMPK on transcription factor expression, we used transient siAMPK-transfected cells to confirm enhancement of transcription factor expression by AMPK activation. The results showed that FOXO1 expression, but not FOXO3 expression, was decreased by MGO treatment in siAMPK-transfected cells (Figure 5(c)). In addition, the expression of LC3B, which is regulated by FOXO1, was also significantly reduced by AMPK silencing (Figure 5(d)). These results indicated that MGO upregulated the mRNA expression of FOXO1 autophagy-related transcription factors by enhancing AMPK activity.

4. Discussion

Autophagy has been shown to inhibit or induce apoptosis in different stress environments; therefore, understanding the effects of autophagy and its mechanisms in different situations remains a major research focus [33]. In the absence of autophagy, MGO-induced apoptosis was significantly increased and treatment with an autophagy activator in addition to MGO significantly increased cell survival. Thus, autophagy in dicarbonyl stress appears to have a protective role in cells.

Although autophagy is controlled through various mechanisms, it is known that the mTOR pathway is a major regulatory pathway in autophagy [30]. Likewise, drugs known as mTOR inhibitors, namely, rapamycin and torin 1, have been reported to significantly increase autophagy [34, 35]. Moreover, AMPK is a master regulator of cellular energy homeostasis and has been shown to induce autophagy via inhibiting mTORC1 signaling through phosphorylation of raptor and TSC2, while also activating ULK1, which is associated with autophagy initiation [36]. Interestingly, our study demonstrated that MGO treatment activates S6K1, a protein downstream of mTORC1. Furthermore, in serum-free conditions, MGO not only induced autophagy but also increased AKT and S6K1 activity, similar to that observed following treatment with insulin. Normally, nutrient deficiency increases autophagy and suppresses the mTOR pathway. These results demonstrate that MGO increases autophagy and mTOR signaling, even under starvation conditions. Furthermore, MGO-induced autophagy was regulated via pathways independent of mTOR. However, both the induction of autophagy and mTOR signaling require further investigation.

AMPK also upregulates autophagy through the activation of specific transcription factors, including FOXOs, TFEB, TFE3, and CREB, which effectively upregulate autophagy by increasing the expression of autophagy-related genes [3739]. Specifically, activated AMPK phosphorylates the Ser383 and Thr649 of FOXO1 to serve as a nuclear transcription factor. Alternatively, AKT phosphorylates the Thr24 and Ser256 of FOXO1, promoting the degradation of cytosolic FOXOs. Since MGO activated both AMPK and AKT, it is difficult to determine the effect of MGO on the transcriptional activity of FOXO1. However, according to a previous study, AMPK-mediated Ser22 phosphorylation of FOXO1 inhibits Thr24 phosphorylation by AKT, and subsequently promotes the degradation of FOXO1 [40]. Our data indicate that the activity of FOXO1 is directly regulated by AMPK in MGO-treated cells. Therefore, FOXO1 may be regulated by AMPK rather than AKT in MGO-treated HK-2 cells.

Specific limitations were noted in this study. First, all conclusions were drawn from in vitro analyses alone. Although, recently, diabetic nephropathy preclinical animal models have been reported, most of these mouse models only partially reflect the phenotype of diabetic nephropathy, such as hyperfiltration, mesangial expansion, and glomerular basement membrane thickening. Therefore, novel nephropathy models of complete diabetic kidney disease are needed to validate our findings [41]. Second, further studies are needed to determine whether increasing the activity of autophagy in diabetic nephropathy is effective in alleviating diabetic complications.

5. Conclusions

The data obtained through this study indicate that MGO induces both apoptosis and autophagy. MGO induced autophagy by inducing AMPK activity independently of mTOR signaling. Further, we found that autophagy reduced MGO-induced apoptosis through AMPK activation. MGO-activated AMPK increased FOXO1 expression, an autophagy-related transcription factor, resulting in an increased expression of autophagy-related genes. These findings are expected to be useful in carbonyl stress-related diseases, such as diabetic nephropathy treatment and prevention strategies.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

So-Hyun Park and Hyun-Il Choi contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Main Research Program of the Korea Food Research Institute, funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, & Future Planning (grant number E0187400).

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: cellular viability of MGO-treated SV40MES13 cells. SV40MES13 cells were treated with various concentrations of MGO (0-0.75 mM) for 24 h, and cell viability was measured using the MTT assay. Figure S2: protein levels of autophagy-related genes in MGO-treated SV40MES13 cells. SV40MES13 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate ( cells per well). On the next day, the cells were treated with 0–0.25 mM of MGO for 24 h. The cells were harvested and analyzed by immunoblotting. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. I. Allaman, M. Bélanger, and P. J. Magistretti, “Methylglyoxal, the dark side of glycolysis,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 23, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. M. Chan, D. Y. Huang, Y. P. Huang et al., “Methylglyoxal induces cell death through endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated ROS production and mitochondrial dysfunction,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1749–1760, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Bellier, M.-J. Nokin, E. Lardé et al., “Methylglyoxal, a potent inducer of AGEs, connects between diabetes and cancer,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 148, pp. 200–211, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Wang, J. Liu, and L. Wu, “Methylglyoxal-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in vascular smooth muscle cells,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 1709–1716, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Moraru, J. Wiederstein, D. Pfaff et al., “Elevated levels of the reactive metabolite methylglyoxal recapitulate progression of type 2 diabetes,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 926–934.e8, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Pastor-Belda, A. J. Fernández-García, N. Campillo et al., “Glyoxal and methylglyoxal as urinary markers of diabetes. Determination using a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1509, pp. 43–49, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. M. J. Hanssen, J. Westerink, J. L. J. M. Scheijen et al., “Higher plasma methylglyoxal levels are associated with incident cardiovascular disease and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1689–1695, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. M. Lee, C. Y. Lee, G. Zhang, A. Lyu, and K. K. M. Yue, “Methylglyoxal activates osteoclasts through JNK pathway leading to osteoporosis,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 308, pp. 147–154, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. A. Shamsaldeen, L. S. Mackenzie, L. A. Lione, and C. D. Benham, “Methylglyoxal, a metabolite increased in diabetes is associated with insulin resistance, vascular dysfunction and neuropathies,” Current Drug Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 359–367, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. X. Huang, F. Wang, W. Chen, Y. Chen, N. Wang, and K. von Maltzan, “Possible link between the cognitive dysfunction associated with diabetes mellitus and the neurotoxicity of methylglyoxal,” Brain Research, vol. 1469, pp. 82–91, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. S. Fosmark, P. A. Torjesen, B. K. Kilhovd et al., “Increased serum levels of the specific advanced glycation end product methylglyoxal-derived hydroimidazolone are associated with retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Metabolism, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 232–236, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Forbes and M. E. Cooper, “Mechanisms of diabetic complications,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 137–188, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Berlanga, D. Cibrian, I. Guillén et al., “Methylglyoxal administration induces diabetes-like microvascular changes and perturbs the healing process of cutaneous wounds,” Clinical Science, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 83–95, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. J. Beisswenger, S. K. Howell, G. B. Russell, M. E. Miller, S. S. Rich, and M. Mauer, “Early progression of diabetic nephropathy correlates with methylglyoxal-derived advanced glycation end products,” Diabetes Care, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 3234–3239, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. D. Rabinowitz and E. White, “Autophagy and metabolism,” Science, vol. 330, no. 6009, pp. 1344–1348, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Skah, N. Richartz, E. Duthil et al., “cAMP-mediated autophagy inhibits DNA damage-induced death of leukemia cells independent of p53,” Oncotarget, vol. 9, no. 54, pp. 30434–30449, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. X.-T. Zheng, Z.-H. Wu, Y. Wei et al., “Induction of autophagy by salidroside through the AMPK-mTOR pathway protects vascular endothelial cells from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 425, no. 1-2, pp. 125–138, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. N. N'Diaye, K. K. Kajihara, I. Hsieh, H. Morisaki, J. Debnath, and E. J. Brown, “PLIC proteins or ubiquilins regulate autophagy-dependent cell survival during nutrient starvation,” EMBO Reports, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 173–179, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Vizza, A. Perri, G. Toteda et al., “Rapamycin-induced autophagy protects proximal tubular renal cells against proteinuric damage through the transcriptional activation of the nerve growth factor receptor NGFR,” Autophagy, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1028–1042, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Q. Liu, L. Zhang, J. Yao, S. Yao, and T. Yuan, “AMPK alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress by inducing the ER-chaperone ORP150 via FOXO1 to protect human bronchial cells from apoptosis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 497, no. 2, pp. 564–570, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Fang, X. Li, Y. Zhong et al., “Autophagy protects human brain microvascular endothelial cells against methylglyoxal-induced injuries, reproducible in a cerebral ischemic model in diabetic rats,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 431–440, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Liu, J. Huang, X. Zheng et al., “Luteolin, a natural flavonoid, inhibits methylglyoxal induced apoptosis via the mTOR/4E-BP1 signaling pathway,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7877, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. H. Lee, J. Ahn, Y. J. Jang, T. Y. Ha, and C. H. Jung, “Oleic acid-induced defective autolysosome shows impaired lipid degradation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 513, no. 3, pp. 553–559, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. H. Jang, E. A. Kim, H. J. Park et al., “Methylglyoxal-induced apoptosis is dependent on the suppression of c-FLIPL expression via down-regulation of p65 in endothelial cells,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2720–2731, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y.-C. Chang, M.-C. Hsieh, H.-J. Wu, W.-C. Wu, and Y.-H. Kao, “Methylglyoxal, a reactive glucose metabolite, enhances autophagy flux and suppresses proliferation of human retinal pigment epithelial ARPE-19 cells,” Toxicology In Vitro, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1358–1368, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. L. Dafre, A. E. Schmitz, and P. Maher, “Methylglyoxal-induced AMPK activation leads to autophagic degradation of thioredoxin 1 and glyoxalase 2 in HT22 nerve cells,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 108, pp. 270–279, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. R. Yoshii and N. Mizushima, “Monitoring and measuring autophagy,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 9, p. 1865, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Y. Liu and B. Levine, “Autosis and autophagic cell death: the dark side of autophagy,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 367–376, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Codogno and A. J. Meijer, “Atg5: more than an autophagy factor,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1045–1047, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. H. Jung, S.-H. Ro, J. Cao, N. M. Otto, and D.-H. Kim, “mTOR regulation of autophagy,” FEBS Letters, vol. 584, no. 7, pp. 1287–1295, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. M. J. Sanchez, R. B. Candau, and H. Bernardi, “FoxO transcription factors: their roles in the maintenance of skeletal muscle homeostasis,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 1657–1671, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. M. Sanchez, A. Csibi, A. Raibon et al., “AMPK promotes skeletal muscle autophagy through activation of forkhead FoxO3a and interaction with Ulk1,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 695–710, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. C. Maiuri, E. Zalckvar, A. Kimchi, and G. Kroemer, “Self-eating and self-killing: crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 741–752, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. C. Thoreen, S. A. Kang, J. W. Chang et al., “An ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor reveals rapamycin-resistant functions of mTORC1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 12, pp. 8023–8032, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. X. Lin, L. Han, J. Weng, K. Wang, and T. Chen, “Rapamycin inhibits proliferation and induces autophagy in human neuroblastoma cells,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 38, no. 6, article BSR20181822, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. I. Tamargo-Gómez and G. Mariño, “AMPK: regulation of metabolic dynamics in the context of autophagy,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 12, article 3812, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. M. Thomson, S. T. Herway, N. Fillmore et al., “AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylates transcription factors of the CREB family,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 429–438, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. el-Houjeiri, E. Possik, T. Vijayaraghavan et al., “The transcription factors TFEB and TFE3 link the FLCN-AMPK signaling axis to innate immune response and pathogen resistance,” Cell Reports, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 3613–3628.e6, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. Nystrom and C. Lang, “Sepsis and AMPK activation by AICAR differentially regulate foxO-1, -3 and -4 mRNA in striated muscle,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–63, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  40. M. Saline, L. Badertscher, M. Wolter et al., “AMPK and AKT protein kinases hierarchically phosphorylate the N-terminus of the FOXO1 transcription factor, modulating interactions with 14-3-3 proteins,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 294, no. 35, pp. 13106–13116, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. F. C. Brosius III, C. E. Alpers, E. P. Bottinger et al., “Mouse models of diabetic nephropathy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2503–2512, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 So-Hyun Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views273
Downloads170
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.