Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Redox Systems Biology in Chronic Kidney Disease

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5571638 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571638

Chan-Yen Kuo, Valeria Chiu, Po-Chun Hsieh, Tien Hsu, Ting-Yun Lin, "Loss of Function of von Hippel-Lindau Trigger Lipocalin 2-Dependent Inflammatory Responses in Cultured and Primary Renal Tubular Cells", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2021, Article ID 5571638, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5571638

Loss of Function of von Hippel-Lindau Trigger Lipocalin 2-Dependent Inflammatory Responses in Cultured and Primary Renal Tubular Cells

Academic Editor: Stefanos Roumeliotis
Received14 Jan 2021
Revised05 May 2021
Accepted03 Jun 2021
Published23 Jun 2021

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that mutations in the tumor suppressor gene von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) can result in the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and chronic inflammation and are a significant predisposing factor for the development of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). To study VHL’s role in ccRCC formation, we previously developed a novel conditional knockout mouse model that mimicked the features of kidney inflammation and fibrosis that lead to cyst formation and hyperplasia. However, due to VHL’s complex cellular functions, the mechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear. Here, we used the HK-2 cells and mouse primary renal tubule cells (mRTCs) carrying VHL mutations as models to study the effects and underlying molecular mechanisms of ROS accumulation. We also studied the role of lipocalin 2 (LCN2) in regulating macrophage recruitment by HK-2 cells. We measured the level of ROS in HK-2 cells in the presence or absence of LCN2 knockdown and found that the VHL mutation caused ROS overproduction, but an LCN2 knockdown could attenuate the process. VHL was also found to mediate the in vitro and in vivo expression and secretion of LCN2. Thus, VHL likely affects ROS production in an LCN2-dependent manner. Our findings also suggest that LCN2 sensitizes the inflammatory response of HK-2 cells and the chemotactic abilities of macrophage RAW264.7 cells. By demonstrating that the loss of function of von Hippel-Lindau triggers lipocalin 2-dependent inflammatory responses in cultured and primary renal tubular cells, our results offer novel insights into a potential therapeutic approach for interfering with the development of ccRCC.

1. Introduction

Mutations in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) play a critical role in developing clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) [1, 2]. Our previous study showed that, in the kidney lesions in Vhl knockout mice, there was a marked increase in inflammation and fibrosis with substantial collagen fiber deposition accumulated within clusters of distorted tubules [3]. We have previously demonstrated that the inflammation and fibrosis in Vhl knockout mouse lesions can be alleviated after treatment with an inhibitor of serine/threonine protein kinase/endoribonuclease (IRE1α) [4]. Inflammation may be caused by changes in proteostasis due to the overproduction of inflammatory cytokines [5, 6]. Notably, it has been hypothesized that inflammation plays a critical role in carcinogenesis [7], and VHL mutation-associated ccRCC likely results from chronic inflammation [3, 8].

Also, VHL is known to regulate many other genes involved in the inflammatory response. For example, VHL regulates the expression of MKI67, a HIF1Α target gene [9], and the marker of ccRCC [10], CA9, whose expression in kidney lesions may also be involved in the pathogenesis of ccRCC.

We further elucidated the inflammatory response in the Vhl knockout kidney by performing a microarray to profile the genes in the whole-kidney extract (Gene Expression Omnibus accession number GSE116326). We used the whole-kidney extract instead of the isolated tubule cell extract to examine the changes in the reactive microenvironment in the Vhl mutant cells. The microarray data showed that one of the candidate genes, LCN2, which encoded lipocalin 2, was highly overexpressed in the Vhl mutant kidney.

Lipocalin 2, also known as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), oncogene 24p3, uterocalin, or siderocalin, is a 24 kDa secreted glycoprotein initially purified from mouse kidney cells infected with simian virus 40 (SV-40) [11]. LCN2 mediates several cellular processes, including apoptosis, proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal differentiation, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 stabilization [12]. High levels of LCN2 expression have been observed in renal, breast, ovary, colon, and brain cancer cells [1315]. In addition, LCN2 is a member of the lipocalin superfamily of proteins that transport hydrophobic molecules, such as retinoids, fatty acids, and organic iron chelators [16]. There is also growing evidence that LCN2 exhibits a cellular protective effect by ameliorating oxidative stress-mediated toxicity under harmful conditions, such as ROS accumulation [1719].

This study sought to investigate the potential role of LCN2 in mediating inflammatory response in VHL-mutated HK-2 cells. Furthermore, we tested the hypothesis that LCN2 was related to VHL mutation-sensitized macrophage migration and mediated inflammation via LCN2-ROS-dependent pathways.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Liproxstatin-1 (Sigma, MO, USA) and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) were purchased.

2.2. Cell Culture

HK-2 (human renal proximal tubular epithelial) and HEK293 (human cell line of kidney origin) cells (Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Taiwan) were cultured in T75 flasks (Corning, NY, USA) in DMEM/Ham’s F12 (Gibco, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 25 mM D-glucose, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and penicillin-streptomycin (50 U/mL; Sigma, MO, USA) at 37°C in a 5% CO2/95% air incubator. The fresh culture medium was replaced every other day. Once the cells reached 60–70% confluence, they were trypsinized for the following experiments.

The murine monocyte/macrophage cell line RAW264.7 (Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Taiwan) was cultured in T75 flasks in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 4 mM L-glutamine, 4500 mg/L glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1500 mg/L sodium bicarbonate, and penicillin-streptomycin (50 U/mL; Sigma, MO, USA) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The fresh culture medium was replaced every other day. Once the cells reached 50–60% confluence, they were trypsinized for the following experiments.

2.3. Culture of Primary Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells

Mouse primary proximal tubule cells (mRTCs) were isolated from wild-type Hoxb7-Cre-GFP/+ (W) or mutant Hoxb7-Cre-GFP/+; Vhlfl/fl (M) mice using a previously described method [2022], with some modifications. Briefly, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The kidneys were immediately removed and placed in 15 mL conical tubes with ice-cold Hank’s balanced salt solution (Biological Industries, CT, USA). The renal capsule, cortex, and excess fat were removed, and the remaining cortical tissue was added into the dunce using two razors. Next, the plunger was pushed down to the bottom of the glass five times to break up the tissue. Then, the tissues were transferred into a 50 mL conical tube on ice. The tubular tissues were centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor at 500 rpm and 4°C for 2 minutes. Then, the supernatant was aspirated and discarded while leaving the pelleted tissue intact.

Afterward, the tube was filled with warm digestion medium containing Collagenase I (Worthington, NJ, USA) at 140 units/mL and 15 mg Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor (Sigma, MO, USA) in 20 mL HBSS and incubated on an orbital shaker at 70 rpm for 15 minutes at 37°C. The tubule suspension was mixed with a 10 mL pipet and returned to the incubator every 5 minutes. After digestion, the tubule suspension was incubated with 20 mL of cold horse serum to inactivate the enzymes and enrich the tubules; the tube was inverted until the suspension became uniform. Then, the tubules were allowed to settle for one minute. The supernatant containing the proximal tubules was transferred to a 50 mL conical tube and centrifuged for 2 minutes at 500 rpm in a swinging bucket rotor. The tubules were washed with 10 mL of HBSS and centrifuged at 500 rpm for 2 minutes. A volume of 1–2 mL of culture medium was added to mix gently with the pellet using a sterile pipet. The cortical tubule suspension was gently layered onto a preformed 40% Percoll/60% culture medium gradient. Then, the tubules were centrifuged at for 10 min at 4°C. The proximal renal tubules in the largest band were transferred to a 50 mL conical tube containing 20 mL of culture medium and centrifuged at 500 rpm for 2 minutes.

Finally, the tubule pellet was resuspend in 20 mL of MRPTC Culture Medium, which consisted of DMEM/F-12 culture media (Gibco, NY, USA) with insulin/transferrin/selenium (5 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, and 5 ng/mL, respectively, Sigma), 0.05 μM hydrocortisone (Sigma), 50 μM L-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate (Wako, Tokyo, Japan), and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (10,000 units/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B, Biological Industries, CT, USA).

Dilutional studies were performed to determine the volume of the resuspended tubules needed for different plates to ensure optimal growth. The tubules were plated on 12-well (1–1.5 mL/well) or 6-well (3 mL/well) Nunclon-treated tissue culture plates (Nalgene/Nunc International, Rochester, NY) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. The media was replaced with MRPTC culture media every day. Confluence can be achieved in 5 to 12 days.

2.4. Transfection

HK-2 cells were transfected with a vector with a scrambled sequence or a vector expressing shVHL1 (V1), shVHL3 (V3), or shLCN2 (L1) (kindly provided by Dr. T. Hsu, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan) using the BTX™ Gemini X2 Electroporation System (BTX, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were transfected with 4 μg of a plasmid with a 100 V pulse for 10 msec, plated in a 6-well plate, and cultured for 48 hours before being analyzed for VHL expression by Western blot to determine the transfection efficiency.

2.5. Measurement of Intracellular ROS Generation

The analysis of the measurement of intracellular ROS generation was according to our previous studies with some modifications [23]. The cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with 10 μM dihydroethidium (DHE; Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) in Hank’s balanced salt solution at 37°C for 30 minutes in the dark. During incubation with ROS, DHE is oxidized and becomes fluorescent. After incubation, the cells were trypsinized and washed with ice-cold PBS three times. The level of ROS was quantified by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.6. Western Blot Analyses

The antibodies for Western blot analyses included the mouse monoclonal antibodies against VHL (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); NF-κB’s p65 subunit (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA); JNK (Cell Signaling, MA, USA); p-JNK, β-actin, and fibrillarin (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA); and the rabbit polyclonal antibodies against LCN2 and GAPDH (ABclonal, MA, USA). The β-actin was diluted 1 : 500 in the final working solution; all other antibodies were diluted 1 : 1000.

2.7. Nuclear Fraction Extraction

The chemotaxis analysis was according to our previous studies with some modifications [23]. Nuclear fractions were extracted from the HK-2 or mRTC cells. The cells were collected and resuspended in a hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9; 10 mM KCl; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 0.2 mM PMSF; 20 μg/mL aprotinin; 0.5 mM DTT; and 0.5% NP-40) on ice for 15 minutes. After centrifuging at for 15 minutes at 4°C, the pellet was collected and washed with a basal buffer (the hypotonic buffer without the 0.5% NP-40). After centrifuging again at for 15 minutes at 4°C, the pellet was collected and resuspended in a hypertonic buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9; 400 mM KCl; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 0.2 mM PMSF; 20 μg/mL aprotinin; 0.5 mM DTT; 0.2 mM EDTA; 10% glycerol) at room temperature for 30 minutes. After centrifuging at for 30 minutes at 4°C, the supernatant containing the nuclear fraction was collected.

2.8. Chemotaxis Assay

The chemotaxis analysis was according to our previous studies with some modifications [23]. A 24-well Transwell plate (8 μm pore size, Corning, NY, USA) was used to measure the chemotactic ability of the RAW274.7 cells. HK-2 cells were added into the lower chamber and transfected with a vector carrying a scrambled or the shVHL [24] sequence by electroporation. After incubation for 48 hours, the cells were treated with the indicated inhibitors for 24 hours in a serum-free medium supplemented with 5% bovine serum albumin (BIONOVAS, Toronto, Canada). Then, RAW264.7 cells were added to the upper chamber with an uncoated membrane in a serum-free medium supplemented with 5% bovine serum albumin (BIONOVAS, Toronto, Canada). In separate experiments, RAW264.7 cells were exposed to recombinant human lipocalin 2/NGAL protein (rhLCN2) (Novus Biologicals, CO, USA) added to the serum-free medium and their migration measured. After 24 hours, the migratory cells on the underside of the membrane of the upper chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 5 minutes, washed with H2O, and scanned using an EPSON V750 PRO scanner. The cells were destained for crystal violet with methanol for 15 minutes and measured at OD570 with the Synergy HT (BioTek, VT, USA).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as . The groups were compared using a one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc analysis; was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. VHL Mutation-Induced ROS Production in an LCN2-Dependent Manner

We investigated the effect of VHL deficiency on ROS production by measuring the level of ROS in VHL knockdown HK-2 cells using a previously described protocol [2527]. We found that VHL knockdown caused ROS overproduction in HK-2 cells (Figure 1).

LCN2 is one of the candidate genes predominantly related to immune response; however, its role in precancerous kidney cells is still unclear. We hypothesized that VHL deficiency caused inflammation and immune cell infiltration by overexpressing LCN2 in HK-2 cells and mouse primary renal tubule cells (mRTCs). VHL knockdown was found to induce LCN2 secretion in HK-2 cells (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Meanwhile, the level of LCN2 was elevated in Vhl mutant mRTCs (Figure 3). Interestingly, the enhanced level of LCN2 was detected in the urine of Vhl conditional knockout mice (Figure 2(d)). The presence of LCN2 in urine indicates acute kidney injury (AKI) [28]. These findings demonstrated that VHL deficiency induced expression and secretion of LCN2 in vitro and in vivo.

We further studied the role of LCN2 on ROS production by examining the effect of LCN2 knockdown on ROS levels. The increase in ROS levels was attenuated in LCN2 knockdown in VHL-deficient (knockdown) HK-2 cells (Figure 4).

3.2. Vhl Mutant Caused Inflammatory Response and Sensitized RAW264.7 Cell Chemotaxis in a LCN2-Dependent Manner

We dissected the role of LCN2 in inflammation by investigating the effect of LCN2 knockdown on the phosphorylation of JNK and the nuclear translocation of NF-κB’s p65 subunit in HK-2 cells and chemotaxis of RAW264.7 cells. LCN2 knockdown was found to significantly attenuate the increase in p-JNK expression activated by Figure 5. LCN2 knockdown also diminished the nuclear translocation of p65 in the VHL knockdown HK-2 cells, as demonstrated by Western blotting (Figure 6).

On the other hand, Vhl mutant was found to induce the chemotaxis of the RAW264.7 cells (Figure 7, V3/SC compared with SC/SC), and LCN2 knockdown could reduce the Transwell migration of RAW264.7 induced by VHL knockdown HK-2 cells (Figure 7, V3/L1 compared with V3/SC). This suggests that LCN2 is required for the chemotactic function of VHL-deficient HK-2 cells. We confirm the chemotactic effect of LCN2 by comparing the relative migration of RAW264.7 cells in the absence and presence (100 ng/mL) of recombinant human LCN2 (rhLCN2). We found that LCN2 significantly induced RAW264.7 cell migration after the rhLCN2 treatment (Figure 8). In summary, our findings suggested that LCN2 sensitizes the inflammatory response of HK-2 cells and chemotactic abilities of macrophage RAW264.7 cells.

4. Discussion

The mechanism underlying the inflammatory response to VHL inactivation in kidney tubule cells presents an intriguing pathophysiological question and a potential therapeutic target. It has been shown that VHL mutant cells are involved in increased protein synthesis and ROS accumulation [4], likely due to the increased mTOR signaling in the mutant cells [29, 30]. Moreover, the significantly elevated activation of immune cells likely contributes substantially to tissue damage during inflammatory diseases.

VHL/Vhl mutation causes HIF overexpression [31, 32]. During HIF overexpression, excessive protein synthesis occurs, leading to metabolic problems, ROS accumulation, and, eventually, ER stress. In addition, HIF overexpression resulted in mitochondrial damage, disruption of the TCA cycle, severe hypoxia stress, and Warburg effect [30, 33].

LCN2 is critical for the inflammation in retinal degeneration [34], ocular disease [35], intestinal tract [16, 36], ischemic stroke [37], psoriasis [38], cardiovascular diseases [39], alcoholic steatohepatitis [40, 41], nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [42], muscle-skeletal disorders [43], and lung infection [44]. However, LCN2’s role in the VHL-mutation-mediated progression of tumor formation via the regulation of oxidative homeostasis and mitochondrial metabolism has not been previously studied. The present study shows that mutant VHL induces ROS production in an LCN2-dependent manner (Figures 14). On the other hand, the results also show that mutant VHL sensitized RAW264.7 cell chemotaxis in an LCN2-dependent manner (Figures 58). The diverse functional roles of LCN2 were exemplified in the central nervous systems [45]. Therefore, emerging evidence suggests that LCN2 has protective as well as pathogenic activities [4648]. We propose that the dual biological effects of LCN2 may be considered during the design of therapeutics against ccRCC.

5. Conclusion

Our results indicated that VHL deficiency caused overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), but an LCN2 knockdown could reverse this process. VHL deficiency was also found to increase in vitro and in vivo LCN2 expression and secretion. Our findings reveal that the regulatory effect of VHL on chronic inflammation in ccRCC progression is likely mediated, at least in part, via the LCN2-ROS pathway (Figure 9). Our study offers novel insights into the therapeutic target and strategy for attenuating the development of ccRCC.

Data Availability

The original data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We express appreciation for the research assistants, Mrs. Yi-Ying Lin and Ming-Cheng Lee, at the core laboratory, Department of Research, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan, for their assistance with flow cytometry and Western blot, respectively. This study was supported by the Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan (TCRD-TPE-109-06 and 109-2320-B-303-004-MY3).

References

  1. H. T. Cohen and F. J. McGovern, “Renal-cell carcinoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 23, pp. 2477–2490, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Y. Kim and W. G. Kaelin, “Role of VHL gene mutation in human cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 4991–5004, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. L. Pritchett, H. L. Bader, J. Henderson, and T. Hsu, “Conditional inactivation of the mouse von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene results in wide-spread hyperplastic, inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in the kidney,” Oncogene, vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 2631–2639, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Y. Kuo, C. H. Lin, and T. Hsu, “VHL inactivation in precancerous kidney cells induces an inflammatory response via ER stress-activated IRE1α signaling,” Cancer Research, vol. 77, no. 13, pp. 3406–3416, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Verfaillie, A. D. Garg, and P. Agostinis, “Targeting ER stress induced apoptosis and inflammation in cancer,” Cancer Letters, vol. 332, no. 2, pp. 249–264, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. P. Meares, Y. Liu, R. Rajbhandari et al., “PERK-dependent activation of JAK1 and STAT3 contributes to endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced inflammation,” Molecular and cellular biology, vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 3911–3925, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. M. Coussens and Z. Werb, “Inflammation and cancer,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 860–867, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. R. de Vivar Chevez, J. Finke, and R. Bukowski, “The role of inflammation in kidney cancer,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 816, pp. 197–234, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. J. Mandriota, K. J. Turner, D. R. Davies et al., “HIF activation identifies early lesions in VHL kidneys: evidence for site-specific tumor suppressor function in the nephron,” Cancer Cell, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 459–468, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Y. Liao, O. N. Aurelio, K. Jan, J. Zavada, and E. J. Stanbridge, “Identification of the MN/CA9 protein as a reliable diagnostic biomarker of clear cell carcinoma of the kidney,” Cancer Research., vol. 57, no. 14, pp. 2827–2831, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  11. S. Chakraborty, S. Kaur, S. Guha, and S. K. Batra, “The multifaceted roles of neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) in inflammation and cancer,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1826, no. 1, pp. 129–169, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X. Xiao, B. S. Yeoh, and M. Vijay-Kumar, “Lipocalin 2: an emerging player in iron homeostasis and inflammation,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 103–130, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. M. Bier, “Nutrition from the inside out,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. V. Torti and F. M. Torti, “Iron and cancer: more ore to be mined,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 342–355, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. J. Rodvold, N. R. Mahadevan, and M. Zanetti, “Lipocalin 2 in cancer: when good immunity goes bad,” Cancer Letters, vol. 316, no. 2, pp. 132–138, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. R. Moschen, T. E. Adolph, R. R. Gerner, V. Wieser, and H. Tilg, “Lipocalin-2: a master mediator of intestinal and metabolic inflammation,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 388–397, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. H. Roudkenar, R. Halabian, P. Bahmani, A. M. Roushandeh, Y. Kuwahara, and M. Fukumoto, “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: a new antioxidant that exerts its cytoprotective effect independent on heme oxygenase-1,” Free Radical Research, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 810–819, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. Bahmani, R. Halabian, M. Rouhbakhsh et al., “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin induces the expression of heme oxygenase-1 and superoxide dismutase 1, 2,” Cell Stress & Chaperones, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 395–403, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. H. Roudkenar, R. Halabian, Z. Ghasemipour et al., “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin acts as a protective factor against H2O2 toxicity,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 560–566, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. C. Breggia and J. Himmelfarb, “Primary mouse renal tubular epithelial cells have variable injury tolerance to ischemic and chemical mediators of oxidative stress,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. Nowak and R. G. Schnellmann, “Improved culture conditions stimulate gluconeogenesis in primary cultures of renal proximal tubule cells,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 268, no. 4, pp. C1053–C1061, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. E. Kays and R. G. Schnellmann, “Regeneration of renal proximal tubule cells in primary culture following toxicant injury: response to growth factors,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 273–280, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. H. Huang, C. C. Lan, Y. T. Hsu et al., “Oridonin attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced ROS accumulation and inflammation in HK-2 cells,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2020, Article ID 9724520, 8 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. J. Champion, M. Guinea, V. Dammai, and T. Hsu, “Endothelial function of von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene: control of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 4649–4657, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. W. Cheng, C. Y. Kuo, C. C. Fan et al., “Overexpression of Lon contributes to survival and aggressive phenotype of cancer cells through mitochondrial complex I-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, no. 6, article e681, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Y. Kuo, Y. C. Chiu, A. Y. Lee, and T. L. Hwang, “Mitochondrial Lon protease controls ROS-dependent apoptosis in cardiomyocyte under hypoxia,” Mitochondrion, vol. 23, pp. 7–16, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Y. Kao, Y. C. Chiu, W. C. Fang et al., “Mitochondrial Lon regulates apoptosis through the association with Hsp60-mtHsp70 complex,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 6, no. 2, article e1642, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Cai, J. Rubin, W. Han, P. Venge, and S. Xu, “The origin of multiple molecular forms in urine of HNL/NGAL,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2229–2235, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. W. G. Kaelin Jr., “Cancer and altered metabolism: potential importance of hypoxia-inducible factor and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol. 76, pp. 335–345, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. J. Schönenberger and W. J. Kovacs, “Hypoxia signaling pathways: modulators of oxygen-related organelles,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 3, p. 42, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Zhang and Q. Zhang, “VHL and hypoxia signaling: beyond HIF in cancer,” Biomedicines, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 35, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. N. Shenoy and L. Pagliaro, “Sequential pathogenesis of metastatic VHL mutant clear cell renal cell carcinoma: putting it together with a translational perspective,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1685–1695, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. T. Teoh and S. Y. Lunt, “Metabolism in cancer metastasis: bioenergetics, biosynthesis, and beyond,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, article e1406, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. Parmar, V. M. Parmar, L. Perusek et al., “Lipocalin 2 plays an important role in regulating inflammation in retinal degeneration,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 200, no. 9, pp. 3128–3141, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. W. Tang, J. Ma, R. Gu et al., “Lipocalin 2 suppresses ocular inflammation by inhibiting the activation of NF-κβ pathway in endotoxin-induced uveitis,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 375–388, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. T. Toyonaga, M. Matsuura, K. Mori et al., “Lipocalin 2 prevents intestinal inflammation by enhancing phagocytic bacterial clearance in macrophages,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 35014, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. Zhao, X. Xu, Y. Jiang et al., “Lipocalin-2 may produce damaging effect after cerebral ischemia by inducing astrocytes classical activation,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 168, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. S. Hau, N. Kanda, Y. Tada et al., “Lipocalin-2 exacerbates psoriasiform skin inflammation by augmenting T-helper 17 response,” The Journal of Dermatology, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 785–794, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Amersfoort, F. H. Schaftenaar, H. Douna et al., “Lipocalin-2 contributes to experimental atherosclerosis in a stage-dependent manner,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 275, pp. 214–224, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. Asimakopoulou, S. Weiskirchen, and R. Weiskirchen, “Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) expression in hepatic malfunction and therapy,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 7, p. 430, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. Wieser, P. Tymoszuk, T. E. Adolph et al., “Lipocalin 2 drives neutrophilic inflammation in alcoholic liver disease,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 872–880, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. Ye, K. Yang, S. Zang et al., “Lipocalin-2 mediates non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by promoting neutrophil-macrophage crosstalk via the induction of CXCR2,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 988–997, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I. A. Rebalka, C. M. F. Monaco, N. E. Varah et al., “Loss of the adipokine lipocalin-2 impairs satellite cell activation and skeletal muscle regeneration,” American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology, vol. 315, no. 5, pp. C714–C721, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Guglani, R. Gopal, J. Rangel-Moreno et al., “Lipocalin 2 regulates inflammation during pulmonary mycobacterial infections,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 11, article e50052, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. K. Jha, S. Lee, D. H. Park et al., “Diverse functional roles of lipocalin-2 in the central nervous system,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 135–156, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. W. Zhang, S. Yang, L. Cui, and J. Zhang, “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin worsens ischemia/reperfusion damage of kidney cells by autophagy,” Renal Failure, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1136–1140, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. K. Eller, A. Schroll, M. Banas et al., “Lipocalin-2 expressed in innate immune cells is an endogenous inhibitor of inflammation in murine nephrotoxic serum nephritis,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, article e67693, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Y. K. Chan, H. K. Sung, J. W. Jahng, G. H. Kim, M. Han, and G. Sweeney, “Lipocalin-2 inhibits autophagy and induces insulin resistance in H9c2 cells,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 430, pp. 68–76, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Chan-Yen Kuo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views262
Downloads311
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.