<i>α</i>-Synuclein E46K Mutation and Involvement of Oxidative Stress in a <i>Drosophila</i> Model of Parkinson’s Disease

Reiszadeh Jahromi, Samaneh; Ramesh, S. R.; Finkelstein, David I.; Haddadi, Mohammad

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621507

Parkinson’s Disease

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6621507 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621507

α-Synuclein E46K Mutation and Involvement of Oxidative Stress in a Drosophila Model of Parkinson’s Disease

Samaneh Reiszadeh Jahromi,¹S. R. Ramesh,²David I. Finkelstein,³and Mohammad Haddadi⁴

Academic Editor: Hélio Teive

Received06 Nov 2020

Revised10 Jun 2021

Accepted23 Jun 2021

Published05 Jul 2021

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an age-associated neurodegenerative condition in which some genetic variants are known to increase disease susceptibility on interaction with environmental factors inducing oxidative stress. Different mutations in the SNCA gene are reported as the major genetic contributors to PD. E46K mutation pathogenicity has not been investigated as intensive as other SNCA gene mutations including A30P and A53T. In this study, based on the GAL4-UAS binary genetic tool, transgenic Drosophila melanogaster flies expressing wild-type and E46K-mutated copies of the human SNCA gene were constructed. Western blotting, immunohistochemical analysis, and light and confocal microscopy of flies’ brains were undertaken along with the survival rate measurement, locomotor function assay, and ethanol and paraquat (PQ) tolerance to study α-synuclein neurotoxicity. Biochemical bioassays were carried out to investigate the activity of antioxidant enzymes and alterations in levels of oxidative markers following damages induced by human α-synuclein to the neurons of the transgenic flies. Overexpression of human α-synuclein in the central nervous system of these transgenic flies led to disorganized ommatidia structures and loss of dopaminergic neurons. E46K α-synuclein caused remarkable climbing defects, reduced survivorship, higher ethanol sensitivity, and increased PQ-mediated mortality. A noticeable decline in activity of catalase and superoxide dismutase enzymes besides considerable increase in the levels of lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species was observed in head capsule homogenates of α-synuclein-expressing flies, which indicates obvious involvement of oxidative stress as a causal factor in SNCA^E46K neurotoxicity. In all the investigations, E46K copy of the SNCA gene was found to impose more severe defects when compared to wild-type SNCA. It can be concluded that the constructed Drosophila models developed PD-like symptoms that facilitate comparative studies of molecular and cellular pathways implicated in the pathogenicity of different α-synuclein mutations.

1. Introduction

SNCA gene is mapped to human chromosome 4q22.1 encoding α-synuclein polypeptide. It was recognized as the primary causative gene in the etiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1]. Prior to its association with PD, α-synuclein was characterized as a presynaptic protein acting at neuron terminals in the rat brain [2]. A human homologue of SNCA was discovered in 1993 as the contributor to amyloid plaques deposition in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [3]; the first familial case of parkinsonism was described in 1997, showing a dominant inheritance pattern for an SNCA mutation (A53T) [4]. It was indicated that α-synuclein is a constituent of the Lewy body (LB), showing how SNCA is completely linked to PD [5]. Since then, duplication/triplications and a number of SNCA missense mutations viz., A53T, A30P, E46K, Q51D, and H50Q have been associated with parkinsonism [6]. All these mutations are uncommon and have variable penetrance [7]. Misfolded proteins and aggregations are typical features of neurodegenerative disorders. The Lewy body (LB) is the key pathologic characteristic of PD involving α-synuclein fibrils as a constituent. Importantly, mutations in SNCA are sufficient to provoke familial PD, with autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.

α-Synuclein can acquire several diverse biochemical forms including membrane-bound alpha helix, ß-sheet oligomers, unfolded monomers, as well as insoluble LB fibrils [8]. Mutated α-synuclein variants such as A53T, A30P, and E46K show a tendency to aggregate more rapidly than wild-type SNCA [9, 10].

Oxidative stress (OS) is a putative causal agent in the neurodegenerative process of PD [11]. Auto-oxidation of dopamine and the subsequent neuromelanin production in a multifaceted pathway generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and OS, resulting in dopaminergic neuron failure in PD patients [12–14]. Furthermore, higher iron levels in dopaminergic neurons have been contributed to free radical production through the Fenton and Harber–Weiss reaction triggering neurodegeneration process [15]. α-Synuclein, dopamine, and iron appear to accelerate these processes [16, 17].

Drosophila melanogaster is a widely known model organism to explore the biology of many biological processes including those occurring in PD [18]. Mohite et al. [19] have studied G51D, H50Q, and E46K mutations of the SNCA gene in Drosophila and showed shortened lifespan and age-dependent climbing defects in the transgenic flies. They have concluded that continued α-synuclein oligomer formation is the major cause of dopaminergic neuron death. Sakai et al. [20] have employed transgenic flies to report accelerated α-synuclein monomer protein formation and degradation resistance in SNCA^E46K mutants compared to wild-type and other mutations associated with SNCA gene in familial PD. These studies try to elucidate the molecular basis of SNCA mutation neurotoxicity. However, the involvement of OS in SNCA^E46K pathogenicity remains elusive. In order to investigate the neurotoxicity of the E46K mutation of the SNCA gene and the implication of OS, a transgenic UAS-hSNCA^E46KDrosophila line was constructed. Lifespan, locomotor function, brain histology, biochemical bioassay, ethanol vapour exposure, and paraquat (PQ) induced mortality carried out on adult male flies following E46K α-synuclein overexpression to highlight the possible causative role of OS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fly Stocks

2.1.1. Human SNCA DNA Preparation and Cloning

Random integration of P-element transgenesis was applied in order to construct a transgenic Drosophila line expressing human SNCA [21]. SNCA cDNA plasmid (Sino Biological Inc., China) was subcloned into a pUAST vector [22]. The SNCA^E46K, pMT 18T-SNCA vector served as the template for site-directed mutagenesis. DNA segments were sequenced to verify sequence accuracy. Inserts were cloned in the pUAST vector, which was used to establish transgenic lines (C-CAMP Transgenic Fly Facility, NCBS, Bangalore, India). A total of 5 lines were achieved for the wild-type and mutated SNCA gene. Neuronal expression of the target gene was induced by elav-Gal4. Of all the constructed UAS-hSNCA^E46K transgenic fly stocks, the one with the expression level equal to the wild-type SNCA was identified using quantitative Western blot analysis. Both the selected UAS-SNCA^E46K and UAS-SNCA^WT stocks showed insertion on the second chromosome.

Bloomington Drosophila stocks were used in the current study. Ddc-Gal4 (# 7010) to induce gene expression in dopaminergic neurons, elav^C155-Gal4 (# 458) for Pan neural expression, along with GMR-Gal4 (# 9146) to overexpress hSNCA in Drosophila eye structure. UAS-mCD8::GFP line (# 32186) was employed to visualize neuron morphology. (# 5905) was used as the control genotype. All Drosophila stocks were raised and kept at 22 ± 1°C and relative humidity of 70–80% on standard wheat cream agar media, containing dry yeast granules in a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle in a vivarium. All the study assays were conducted on adult male flies.

2.2. Western Blotting

This assay was carried out based on the method of Bolt and Mahoney [23]. Total head homogenates of 25 flies of each group underwent a standard protein extraction process. Following SDS-PAGE, the gel was transferred to the blotting unit, and after protein bands transfer onto the nitrocellulose membrane, the blot was blocked with 3% BSA at 4°C overnight. Then the blot was kept for incubation with 1:5000 anti-human α-synuclein mouse IgG monoclonal antibody (Cat # ABH0261, Invitrogen, USA), at 4°C overnight. The blot was washed with 0.3% phosphate buffer saline Triton X (PBSTx) for the duration of 30 min. Next, the blot was incubated with 1:1,000 diluted buffer of secondary rabbit anti-mouse HRP conjugated antibody (Cat # 6728, Abcam, UK) in 1X PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was given a wash and then developed using a chromogenic substrate (1X TMB) to detect the horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The expression of the test protein can be monitored by the development of bluish-green color bands to which secondary antibody is bound. Anti-ß-actin antibody (Cat # 8224, Abcam, UK) was utilized as a loading control.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM was conducted to investigate the surface morphology of flies’ eyes using the method of Kimmel et al. [24]. Adult flies were anesthetized and preserved in 25% ethanol at room temperature. The samples were dehydrated in 50%, 75%, and 2 × 100% ethanol for 24 h at each step and dried using hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS). Then to allow HMDS to evaporate, uncapped vials were kept under a fume hood overnight. Dried samples were examined with a Carl Zeiss EVO LS-10 SEM. The captured micrographs were analyzed by the FLEYE tool [25, 26] in ImageJ software [27] to demonstrate the level of ommatidia irregularity. PPi represents the probability of a certain stage of irregularity in a given ommatidium. The index can be a value between 0 and 4 where 1 stands for complete regularity and 4 accounts for total irregularity. A total of 5 samples of each genotype were examined.

2.4. Drosophila Eye Preparation for Ultramicrotomy

Preparation of adult Drosophila eye for thin sectioning was performed as per our previous study [28]. Heads of flies were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde: 2% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight. Osmium tetroxide, 0.5%, was used as the secondary fixative. Next, samples were washed and dehydrated by serial ethanol treatment and subsequent two washing stages with propylene oxide. The infiltration was achieved by storing test tissues in a solution mixture of fresh epoxy resin as well as propylene oxide while holding on a shaker at room temperature. The samples were embedded in moulds filled with freshly prepared epoxy resin. Then the blocks were incubated at 60°C for 48 hours. Finally, the blocks were cut into sections of 1 μm thickness using Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica Mikrosysteme, Austria). Semithin sections underwent toluidine blue staining and were observed with a light microscope. The captured images were analyzed by ImageJ software [26]. A total of 5 samples of each genotype were examined.

2.5. Confocal Microscopy

To inspect and assess CNS dopaminergic neurons in E46K transgenic Drosophila flies, brain dissection was carried out on the ice and subsequently handled for fixation using cold 4% paraformaldehyde for the duration of 30 min. Then, PBSTx was used to wash brain samples for 40 min, with 4 changes per 10 min using a shaker at room temperature. At last, samples were mounted using VECTASHIELD mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, USA). The prepared samples were examined by confocal microscope (LSM 710, Carl Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed by ImageJ software [27]. A total of 5 samples of each genotype were examined.

2.6. Longevity Assay

To assess the SNCA neurotoxicity survival rate of flies, lately enclosed adult flies were clustered in groups of 20. The flies were transferred to fresh media in 3-day intervals. The number of dead flies was quantified in each turnover, and alive insects were considered for calculation of survival [28].

2.7. Negative Geotaxis Assay

The locomotor activity of the flies was characterized by negative geotaxis assay as formerly described [29]. Ten adult male flies were placed in a plastic tube that was marked at 8 cm from the base. Flies were kept for 10 min rest to acclimatize to the new environment. Next, the flies were lightly tapped down to the base. The number of flies that climbed past the 8 cm mark on the tube in 10 seconds was quantified. Six biological replicates of each genotype were analyzed, and the corresponding values were represented as mean ± standard error.

2.8. Locomotion Tracing Assay

To trace the locomotion behaviour of the flies, the iFLY system was used [30]; this system analyzes the flies’ movement in an automated fashion. The iFLY uses a single digital camera to track the trajectories of up to 20 individual flies. Briefly, 10 flies were transferred to a glass tube and then placed in a chamber. To facilitate 3-D tracking, two mirrors were placed at equal angles at the back of the tube to allow side images capture by the camera. A 10-min rest was given to the flies for acclimatizing to the new place. Next, flies were gently tapped down every 30 seconds and their locomotion was recorded for 90 seconds. The captured video clips were analyzed by C-Trax software [30]. The movement of each individual fly was quantified, and corresponding graphs were plotted by the software. Six biological replicates of each genotype were analyzed.

2.9. Ethanol Exposure

Hyperactivity and sedation are of main behavioural responses to acute ethanol exposure that are conserved from flies to mammals [31]. Excessive ethanol intake is associated with ROS generation and reduction in endogenous antioxidant defenses [32]; therefore, the ethanol exposure test was undertaken to investigate locomotion dysfunction in SNCA^E46K PD model flies. The standard protocol of Maples and Rothenfluh [33] was used to measure the ethanol sensitivity of the flies. For this assay, eight flies were collected one day before ethanol exposure. The ST50 (the time required to get half of the flies stationary) and RC50 (the time required for complete recovery of half of the sedated flies) were measured and expressed in minutes. ST50 and RC50 values of eight biological replicates of each genotype were averaged and represented as mean ± standard error.

2.10. Paraquat (PQ) Treatment and Mortality Assay

PQ, a commercial herbicide, is a neurotoxic agent capable of inducing PD-like symptoms in mammalian and Drosophila models [34]. PQ inhibits mitochondrial complex I and leads to excess ROS production [35] that finally results in neuronal death. PQ administration to flies was carried out in a treatment chamber [34]. The PQ chambers were prepared by insertion of a round piece of filter paper presoaked with 5% sucrose and air-dried at the bottom of a glass vial. Then the paper was soaked with 100 μl of PQ (15 mM). The experimental flies were starved for 3 h at 25°C and then transferred to the PQ treatment chamber for 48 h. Fresh filter papers were provided every 24 h, and the mortality rate at 24 h was recorded. The lethal concentration of PQ causing 50% mortality (LC50) was determined by regression analysis, and a sublethal concentration of PQ (15 mM) was applied to investigate survivorship of the SNCA^E46K transgenic flies. Eight replicates per every genotype were analyzed, and the results are reported.

2.11. Biochemical Bioassays

The samples for biochemical assays were homogenates of heads of 100 flies suspended in ice-cold phosphate buffer (PB) and centrifuged at 3,000 for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was subsequently utilized to assess the activity of antioxidant enzymes and levels of oxidative markers. Three different homogenates were prepared from each genotype and served as biological replicates. Each biological replicate was divided into 3 microtubes and used in every bioassay.

As we previously described [36], the catalase (CAT) activity was assessed based on the H₂O₂ hydrolysis rate [37]. The enzyme activity was expressed as μM of H₂O₂ used/min/mg protein. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured based on SOD-mediated inhibition of pyrogallol auto-oxidation [38]. The enzyme activity was shown as units, wherein 1 unit corresponds to 50% inhibition of pyrogallol auto-oxidation. Reduced glutathione content was assessed according to the method of Hissin and Hilf [39] using O-phthalaldehyde (OPA). The glutathione level was estimated using a standard curve and was represented as μg·GSH/mg protein. ROS levels were measured based on the fluorometric method with the DCFH-DA probe [40]. If ROS are present in the reaction, the nonfluorescent DCFH-DA probe gets quickly oxidized into 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF), a highly fluorescent agent that can be spotted using fluorometric measurements. The DCF concentration in test samples was calculated using DCFH-DA standard curve. Lipid peroxidation (LPO) was assessed as per Ohkawa et al. [41] using thiobarbituric acid (TBA). The biochemical basis of LPO assay is malondialdehyde (MDA) synthesis, which is an end product of the LPO process which reacts with TBA and forms a chromogenic solution. The MDA contents of samples were measured using a tetramethoxypropane molar extinction coefficient (ε) value which is equal to 15,600 M⁻¹·cm^−1, the. Estimation of total protein content was performed according to Lowry et al. [42]. The method is based on the reaction of peptide nitrogen and the copper ions in alkaline conditions and consequent Folin–Ciocalteu reagent reduction through copper-catalyzed oxidation of aromatic acids. The protein content of each sample was assessed using the bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard curve.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SE. Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests were applied to all the data series, and results indicate that all the experimental data follow the normal distribution. Therefore, mean comparison between groups was carried out by parametric tests including independent t-test and one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test in SPSS (predictive analytics software) version 22.0. A value of 0.05 was assumed as the minimum level of significance. Three significance level was considered, each represented by different asterisks numbers as demonstrated in all illustrations (, , and ).

3. Results

In the present study, E46K α-synuclein transgenic Drosophila stock was constructed, and Gal4-mediated α-synuclein gene expression in transgenic flies’ brains was verified at the protein level. Western blot analysis on “E46K; elav” transgenic flies head samples was carried out. The results confirmed successful Gal4-UAS-mediated overexpression of E46K mutant form of the human α-synuclein gene in transgenic flies (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Human SNCA expression in the brain of transgenic flies. Western blot analyses of the human α-synuclein protein were made on the brain lysates of the flies expressing human SNCA gene via pUAST-GAL4-mediated gene expression. Lane description: marker (M), negative control genotype, (1), UAS-E46K/+ (2), SNCA^wt/+; elav/+ (3), SNCA^E46K/+; elav/+ (4). The human α-synuclein protein was detected using anti-human α-synuclein mouse IgG monoclonal antibody (Invitrogen, USA). An anti-Drosophila ß-actin antibody (Abcam) was used as a control. Gel analysis tool in ImageJ software revealed no significant difference between bands in lanes 3 and 4 (). This indicated equal expression of wild-type and E46K mutant copy of SNCA gene in the brain of the transgenic flies.

Using a gel analysis tool in ImageJ software [30], the respective bands of each genotype were quantified, and a mutant strain showing expression level with no significant difference to wild-type α-synuclein transgenic () strain was selected for further experiments. Following confirmation of E46K α-synuclein protein expression, behavioural, morphological, and biochemical analysis was performed.

Preliminary evaluation of Drosophila eye structure was carried out in 10-day-old F1 progeny with a stereo microscope. Subsequent SEM studies in these transgenic lines showed that E46K α-synuclein gene overexpression results in degeneration of retinal neurons, a process that was obvious by observing irregular eye surface morphology (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2

Overexpression of the E46K mutant human α-synuclein gene leads to the irregular surface morphology of the eye structures in transgenic flies. Scanning electron micrographs of ommatidial structures in GMR-Gal4::UAS-SNCA^E46K flies show degeneration of retinal neurons which is evident by the irregular organization of ommatidia, extra and/or absence of bristles. (a) GMR/+, (b) GMR/SNCA^WT, and (c) GMR/SNCA^E46K. indicate an irregular shape of ommatidium; the arrow represents the absence of bristle; and the arrowhead represents extra bristles. The ImageJ FLEYE tool illustrates a higher rate of ommatidial irregularity in SNCA^E46K expressing flies (d) that accounts for more severe neuronal degeneration in SNCA^E46K expressing flies compared to that seen in the SNCA^WT (PPi = probability parameter for irregularity). Scale bar, 20 μm. Five samples of each genotype were analyzed.

Light microscopy analysis of the apical tangential sections of the fly ommatidia (Figure 3) revealed disorganized photoreceptor cells within the ommatidial structure and a higher level of neurodegeneration, evident by the observation of vacuoles in E46K α-synuclein transgenic flies.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3

Retinal neuron degeneration in human SNCA transgenic flies. Photomicrographs of apical tangential sections of ommatidia in E46K α-synuclein transgenic flies show disorganized photoreceptor cells, vacuoles, and neurodegeneration (1000x magnification, toluidine blue-stained). (a) GMR/+, (b) GMR/SNCA^WT, and (c) GMR/SNCA^E46K. (d) Measuring total vacuolated area approves that degree of degeneration in SNCA^E46K flies is remarkably higher than observed in the SNCA^WT genotype (; by t-test; n = 15). Scale bar, 10 μm.

The Ddc-Gal4 expression pattern was further assessed using the Ddc-GFP reporter gene complex. Confocal images of the brain of E46K α-synuclein transgenic flies reveal neurodegeneration in protocerebral antero medial (PAM), protocerebral posterior medial (PPM), as well as protocerebral posterior lateral (PPL) clusters of dopaminergic neurons (Figure 4).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4

Confocal images of the brain of E46K α-synuclein transgenic flies demonstrate degeneration in protocerebral antero-medial (PAM), protocerebral postero-medial (PPM), and protocerebral postero-lateral (PPL) clusters of dopaminergic neurons. (a) GFP/+; Ddc/+, (b) GFP/SNCA^WT; Ddc/+, and (c) GFP/SNCA^E46K; Ddc/+. Scale bar, 50 μm. (d) Cell counting indicates a significant reduction in the number of dopaminergic neurons up on SNCA^E46K overexpression, which was prominent for the PPM cluster (; by t-test; n = 15).

Survival assay illustrates that PAN neuronal overexpression of SNCA led to reduced lifespan of the transgenic flies (Figure 5). The maximum lifespan of UAS-SNCA^WT/+; elav/+ flies was 85 ± 2 days while 70 ± 1 days for UAS-SNCA^E46K/+; elav/+ genotype. The median lifespan of SNCA expressing flies displayed a significant reduction when compared to the control genotype (; n = 1440).

The negative geotaxis assay clearly showed that the climbing ability of transgenic flies in the negative geotaxis assay is diminished in an age-dependent manner as compared to control strains. Both the wild-type and E46K exacerbate the climbing potential of the flies at 20th and 25th day of their age. But the frequency of locomotion defects was higher in E46K mutant (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Decreased climbing ability of E46K α-synuclein transgenic flies in a negative geotaxis assay. Dopaminergic neuronal expression of SNCA^E46K in the brain of transgenic flies was driven by the promoter Ddc-Gal4. The descendants showed age-dependent defects in their climbing ability compared to the control genotype. Six replicates of each genotype were analyzed. The average number of flies crossing the 8 cm mark in 10 seconds is significantly decreased in 20-day-old and 25-day-old E46K α-synuclein expressing flies (; by one-way ANOVA; n = 24).

Based on the observed decrease in longevity and climbing defects, 20-day-old adult male flies were used for further behavioural and biochemical investigations.

Automated tracking of individual flies indicates a lower movement rate of SNCA^E46K model flies, and also, it was shown that these flies prefer to stay at the bottom of test tubes, while the control flies travel faster and climb up to the middle and top parts of the tube (Figure 7).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 7

SNCA^E46K transgenic flies move less and slower. An automated fly tracking using iFLY apparatus demonstrates the lower general movement of SNCA^E46K/+; Ddc/+ when compared to the control genotype SNCA^E46K/+. The position of the control flies in the first 2,699 frames (a) is compared to the position of SNCA^WT expressing flies (b). The heat map figure shows a decline in locomotor activity among the PD model transgenic flies. Position histogram of 2,699 frames captured from control genotype, SNCA^E46K/+ (c), and that of SNCA^E46K/+; Ddc/+ genotype (d) indicates control flies spent more of their time on the top of the tube but are able to move across the whole tube. While SNCA transgenic Drosophila flies prefer to stay at the tube bottom and do not climb up. Lighter heat map spots indicate stationary objects.

Behavioural assays regarding ethanol sensitivity were prepared by the valuation of sensitivity 50% (ST50) and recovery 50% (RC50) scores in the transgenic flies. The subsequent results are represented in Figure 8. A perusal of the figure indicates higher sensitivity and lower resistance to ethanol vapour among E46K α-synuclein expressing flies that was evident by lower ST50 and higher RC50 rates compared to the control genotype.

(a)

(b)

Figure 8

SNCA^E46K PD model flies are more sensitive to ethanol vapour. Ethanol exposure sensitivity 50% (ST50) (a) and recovery 50% (RC50) (b) values of SNCA^E46K expressing transgenic flies were compared to the control genotype. The ST50 was 19.7 ± 2 min and 10 ± 1 min in the control genotype (UAS-SNCA^E46K/+) and elav; SNCA^E46K/+ flies, respectively. The values show a significant decrease in the sensitivity of SNCA^E46K PD model flies (; by one-way ANOVA; n = 32). The recovery to 50% of the population was found to be 39 ± 4 min for control insects while the time for recovery for the elav; SNCA^E46K/+ flies was 54 ± 2 min. These data indicate lower ethanol resistance in α-synuclein transgenic flies ( by ANOVA; n = 32).

PQ neurotoxicity was evaluated by mortality percentage following 24 h and 48 h exposure of flies to 15 mM PQ (Figure 9). Human SNCA overexpression caused a high rate of mortality in the transgenic insects exposed to 48 h of PQ administration. The death rate was 18% higher in E46K when compared to SNCA^WT.

Biochemical assessment of enzyme activities and OS markers levels are compiled in Table 1. The results revealed that E46K α-synuclein gene overexpression induces decreased catalase and superoxide dismutase.

Catalase and superoxide dismutase activities were measured as 4.4 ± 0.53 μM·H₂O₂/min/mg protein and 0.47 ± 0.03 unit/mg protein, respectively, in transgenic flies and 6.5 ± 0.27 μM·H₂O₂/min/mg protein and 0.62 ± 0.04 unit/mg protein, respectively, in control ones (, n = 9). Lipid peroxidation and ROS levels were significantly higher in SNCA^E46K model flies than control ones. Lipid peroxidation and ROS levels in transgenic flies were measured as 6.8 ± 0.26 nM MDA/mg protein and 895 ± 21.6 nM DCF/mg protein, respectively. The results revealed significant depletion in glutathione (GSH) level (12.8 ± 1.2 μg GSH/mg protein) in PD model flies as compared to controls (18.5 ± 1.34 μg GSH/mg protein; , n = 9).

4. Discussion

The mutations in the SNCA gene are rare, and the penetrance, pathobiology, and biochemistry of mutations remain to be fully investigated [7]. Genetic manipulation methods such as making transgenic Drosophila are valuable tools to assess such genetic malfunctions. In this study, genetic manipulation was achieved by overexpression of selected human gene under the control of an enhancer sequence, UAS (upstream activating sequence) in binary combination with Gal4 as a transcription factor that can specifically bind to UAS and restrict the expression of the gene of interest both temporally as well as spatially [22]. Therefore, phenotypic consequences mediated by GAL4/UAS can be directly related to a distinct genetic manipulation. In this view, in the present study, transgenic flies bearing E46K mutant form of human SNCA gene were constructed, where Drosophila CNS neurons were targeted for α-synuclein gene overexpression and consequent effects on longevity, movement, ethanol tolerance, PQ-induced mortality, and cellular antioxidant defence system, α-synuclein were evaluated to study the neurotoxicity of the transgene.

A fly PD-like phenotype in α-synuclein transgenics was detected after day 10–12. Assessment of stable age-related molecular modification occurring prior to the beginning of neurodegeneration could reveal the causal biochemical events in the pathology of PD [18, 43]. SNCA^E46K transgenic flies used in the present study demonstrates the most significant behavioural defects in their climbing capability as compared to the control ones. Defective climbing activity is a well-characterized phenotype in all PD model flies [18, 44]. Since GAL4/UAS tool enables the tissue-specific expression of the human gene in defined developmental time, the observed locomotion impairment is due to neuronal demise in the fly brain but not muscle weakness.

The results of our assessments in Drosophila verified the association of α-synuclein overexpression with striking movement defects as characterized by negative geotaxis assay. Our results are in agreement with the results of other studies on the locomotor function of other α-synuclein transgenic animals [45, 46].

The decline in climbing ability, shortened longevity, and dopaminergic neuron loss in E46K-expressing flies are our findings that are in line with the results of Mohite et al. [19] on Drosophila models of PD overexpressing familial α-synuclein mutations. Ommatidial degeneration and locomotor deficits are reported by Sakai et al. [20] where they generated transgenic flies for E46K α-synuclein and other known mutations. These are the same as our study observations. In addition, the E46K variant was reported to be more resistant to degradation and thus had the highest level of expression when compared to other mutant variants [20]. This can support our hypothesis that E46K accumulation can cause OS as illustrated by Ingelsson [47].

The role of OS in the etiology of neurological diseases has been implicated in humans and most models of the disease [48]. OS is thought to be a series of pivotal biochemical events that may cause the onset of PD, α-synuclein aggregation, and dopaminergic neurons degeneration [49]. Intracellular overexpression of α-synuclein and the consequent ROS is involved in plasma membrane damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and decline in glutathione level, all of which make the brain susceptible to oxidative damage [50].

Results of our study illustrated significant elevation of ROS and LPO levels and marked depletion of glutathione level in α-synuclein-expressing transgenic flies. Our findings are in line with those of other studies demonstrating higher levels of ROS as well as LPO in the PD model of Drosophila [44, 45]. Interestingly, our results demonstrated diminished activity of CAT and SOD enzymes in E46K α-synuclein-expressing flies, as was reported in DJ-1 mutant flies [51] and SNCA A30P flies [34].

The α-synuclein-expressing transgenic flies demonstrate elevated sensitivity to neurotoxins in comparison to wild-type strains [52]. PQ, one of the most commonly used herbicides, can specifically affect dopaminergic neurons and lead to the development of movement disorders similar to PD symptoms [53]. Neurotoxicity of PQ could originate from its interaction mitochondria and inhibition of complex I leading to excess ROS generation and cell death [35]. Oxidative metabolism of ethanol persuades ROS production and OS. Ethanol exposure causes membrane lipid peroxidation [54], depletion of glutathione, and formation of protein carbonyl that serve as markers of OS in the brain [55]. Several dopaminergic neurons are engaged in ethanol-related impairments in mammalian CNS as well as in Drosophila [56]. It has been reported in our previous publication that A30P and A53T α-synuclein transgenic Drosophila have lower ethanol tolerance [29].

These findings support the idea that the production of free radicals and OS can heighten α-synuclein toxicity. Exposing α-synuclein PD model transgenic flies to neurotoxins such as PQ and ethanol incorporates both genetic and environmental factors and makes an ideal combined genetic-toxin in vivo model to study the interaction of pathogenic pathways that underlie the progression of PD.

Human SNCA has no Drosophila ortholog, and therefore, identification and characterization of gene networks and α-synuclein modifier genes are time-consuming and hard procedures. However, the present study provided powerful evidence for the contribution of α-synuclein to oxidative damage in the onset of PD symptoms in SNCA^E46K transgenic flies. This is similar to other SNCA mutations, that is, neurodegenerative, biochemical, and morphological changes. This study shows that this PD fly model provides a useful tool to make systematic and comparative assessments possible, to targeting efficient disease management strategies, prior to the start of its visible symptoms.

Data Availability

All the data are included within this article.

Disclosure

An earlier version of the manuscript has been presented as Preprint in Biorxiv (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.28.969501v1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research project was supported by the Iran National Institute for Medical Research Development, under grant no. NIMAD-957644, and the University of Zabol, under grant no. 9517-51.

References

C. L. D. C. Campêlo and R. H. Silva, “Genetic variants in SNCA and the risk of sporadic Parkinson’s disease and clinical outcomes: a review,” Parkinson’s Disease, vol. 2017, Article ID 4318416, 11 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Maroteaux, J. Campanelli, and R. Scheller, “Synuclein: a neuron-specific protein localized to the nucleus and presynaptic nerve terminal,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2804–2815, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Uéda, H. Fukushima, E. Masliah et al., “Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding an unrecognized component of amyloid in Alzheimer disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 90, no. 23, pp. 11282–11286, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Polymeropoulos, C. Lavedan, E. Leroy et al., “Mutation in the -synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease,” Science, vol. 276, no. 5321, pp. 2045–2047, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Xia, L. Liao, D. Cheng et al., “Proteomic identification of novel proteins associated with Lewy bodies,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, pp. 3850–3856, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Kiely, Y. T. Asi, E. Kara et al., “α-Synucleinopathy associated with G51D SNCA mutation: a link between Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy?” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 753–769, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Heinzel, D. Berg, T. Gasser, H. Chen, C. Yao, and R. B. Postuma, “Update of the MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson’s disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1464–1470, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Cookson, “α-Synuclein and neuronal cell death,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 9, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Conway, S.-J. Lee, J.-C. Rochet, T. T. Ding, R. E. Williamson, and P. T. Lansbury Jr, “Acceleration of oligomerization, not fibrillization, is a shared property of both alpha-synuclein mutations linked to early-onset Parkinson’s disease: implications for pathogenesis and therapy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 571–576, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Choi, S. Zibaee, R. Jakes et al., “Mutation E46K increases phospholipid binding and assembly into filaments of human α-synuclein,” FEBS Letters, vol. 576, no. 3, pp. 363–368, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Litvan, G. Halliday, M. Hallett et al., “The etiopathogenesis of Parkinson disease and suggestions for future research. Part I,” Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 251–257, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Hirsch, “Why are nigral catecholaminergic neurons more vulnerable than other cells in Parkinson’s disease?” Annals of Neurology, vol. 32, pp. S88–S93, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zecca, D. Tampellini, M. Gerlach, P. Riederer, R. G. Fariello, and D. Sulzer, “Substantia nigra neuromelanin: structure, synthesis, and molecular behaviour,” Molecular Pathology: MP, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 414–418, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Sulzer, “Multiple hit hypotheses for dopamine neuron loss in Parkinson’s disease,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 244–250, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. T. Dexter, F. R. Wells, A. J. Lee et al., “Increased nigral iron content and alterations in other metal ions occurring in brain in Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1830–1836, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Cappai, S. L. Leck, D. J. Tew et al., “Dopamine promotes α‐synuclein aggregation into SDS‐resistant soluble oligomers via a distinct folding pathway,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1377–1379, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. I. Finkelstein, J. L. Billings, P. A. Adlard et al., “The novel compound PBT434 prevents iron mediated neurodegeneration and alpha-synuclein toxicity in multiple models of Parkinson’s disease,” Acta Neuropathol Commun, vol. 5, pp. 1–6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Feany and W. W. Bender, “A Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease,” Nature, vol. 404, no. 6776, pp. 394–398, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Mohite, S. Dwivedi, S. Das et al., “Parkinson’s disease associated α-synuclein familial mutants promote dopaminergic neuronal death in Drosophila melanogaster,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2628–2638, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sakai, M. Suzuki, M. Ueyama et al., “E46K mutant α-synuclein is more degradation resistant and exhibits greater toxic effects than wild-type α-synuclein in Drosophila models of Parkinson’s disease,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 6, Article ID e0218261, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. D. Southall and A. H. Brand, “Generation of driver and reporter constructs for the GAL4 expression system in Drosophila,” CSH Protocols, vol. 7, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Brand and N. Perrimon, “Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes,” Development, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 401–415, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. W. Bolt and P. A. Mahoney, “High-efficiency blotting of proteins of diverse sizes following sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 247, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Kimmel, U. Heberlein, and G. M. Rubin, “The homeo domain protein rough is expressed in a subset of cells in the developing Drosophila eye where it can specify photoreceptor cell subtype,” Genes & Development, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 712–727, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Abtahi, R. Masoudi, and M. Haddadi, “The distinctive role of tau and amyloid beta in mitochondrial dysfunction through alteration in Mfn2 and Drp1 mRNA levels: a comparative study in Drosophila melanogaster,” Gene, vol. 754, Article ID 144854, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Diez-Hermano, J. Valero, C. Rueda, M. D. Ganfornina, and D. Sanchez, “An automated image analysis method to measure regularity in biological patterns: a case study in a Drosophila neurodegenerative model,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 9, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri, “NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 671–675, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Haddadi, U. Nongthomba, S. R. Jahromi, and S. Ramesh, “Transgenic Drosophila model to study apolipoprotein E4-induced neurodegeneration,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 301, pp. 10–18, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Jahromi, M. Haddadi, T. Shivanandappa, and S. R. Ramesh, “Attenuation of neuromotor deficits by natural antioxidants of Decalepis hamiltonii in transgenic Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease,” Neuroscience, vol. 293, pp. 136–150, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Kohlhoff, T. R. Jahn, D. A. Lomas, C. M. Dobson, D. C. Crowther, and M. Vendruscolo, “The iFly tracking system for an automated locomotor and behavioural analysis of Drosophila melanogaster,” Integrative Biology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 755–760, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Morean and W. R. Corbin, “Subjective response to alcohol: a critical review of the literature,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 385–395, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Das and D. M. Vasudevan, “Alcohol-induced oxidative stress,” Life Sciences, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 177–187, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Maples and A. Rothenfluh, “A simple way to measure ethanol sensitivity in flies,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol. 48, p. 2541, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Jahromi, M. Haddadi, T. Shivanandappa, and S. R. Ramesh, “Neuroprotective effect of Decalepis hamiltonii in paraquat-induced neurotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster: biochemical and behavioral evidences,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2616–2624, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Yumino, I. Kawakami, M. Tamura, T. Hayashi, and M. Nakamura, “Paraquat- and diquat-induced oxygen radical generation and lipid peroxidation in rat brain microsomes,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 565–570, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Haddadi, S. R. Jahromi, U. Nongthomba, T. Shivanandappa, and S. R. Ramesh, “4-Hydroxyisophthalic acid from Decalepis hamiltonii rescues the neurobehavioral deficit in transgenic Drosophila model of taupathies,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 100, pp. 78–90, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Aebi, “Catalase in vitro,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 105, pp. 121–126, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Marklund and G. Marklund, “Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 469–474, 1974.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Hissin and R. Hilf, “A fluorometric method for determination of oxidized and reduced glutathione in tissues,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 74, pp. 214–226, 1976.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Black and R. B. Brandt, “Spectrofluorometric analysis of hydrogen peroxide,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 246–254, 1974.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ohkawa, N. Ohishi, and K. Yagi, “Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 351–358, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Lowry, N. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. Randall, “Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Xun, R. A. Sowell, T. C. Kaufman, and D. E. Clemmer, “Protein expression in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 348–357, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Shaltiel-Karyo, D. Davidi, Y. Menuchin et al., “A novel, sensitive assay for behavioral defects in Parkinson’s disease model Drosophila,” Parkinson’s Disease, vol. 2012, Article ID 697564, 6 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wassef, R. Haenold, A. Hansel, N. Brot, S. H. Heinemann, and T. Hoshi, “Methionine sulfoxide reductase A and a dietary supplement S-methyl-L-cysteine prevent Parkinson’s-like symptoms,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 47, pp. 12808–12816, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kudo, D. H. Loh, D. Truong, Y. Wu, and C. S. Colwell, “Circadian dysfunction in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 232, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ingelsson, “Alpha-Synuclein oligomers-neurotoxic molecules in Parkinson’s disease and other Lewy body disorders,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 408, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Lin and M. F. Beal, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7113, pp. 787–795, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Quilty, A. E. King, W.-P. Gai et al., “Alpha-synuclein is upregulated in neurones in response to chronic oxidative stress and is associated with neuroprotection,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 249–256, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Mancuso, G. Scapagini, D. Currò et al., “Mitochondrial dysfunction, free radical generation and cellular stress response in neurodegenerative disorders,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1107–1123, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Casani, R. Gómez-Pastor, E. Matallana, and N. Paricio, “Antioxidant compound supplementation prevents oxidative damage in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 61, pp. 151–160, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Y. Chau, J. M. Cooper, and A. H. V. Schapira, “Rasagiline protects against alpha-synuclein induced sensitivity to oxidative stress in dopaminergic cells,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 525–529, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Halliwell, “Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: where are we now?” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1634–1658, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dey and A. I. Cederbaum, “Alcohol and oxidative liver injury,” Hepatology, vol. 43, pp. S63–S74, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Baliño, R. Romero-Cano, J. V. Sánchez‐Andrés, V. Valls, C. G. Aragón, and M. Muriach, “Effects of acute ethanol administration on brain oxidative status: the role of acetaldehyde,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1672–1681, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Chvilicek, I. Titos, and A. Rothenfluh, “The neurotransmitters involved in Drosophila alcohol-induced behaviors,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 14, Article ID 607700, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Samaneh Reiszadeh Jahromi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

744

Downloads

731

Citations