Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2014, Article ID 937051, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/937051
Research Article

The Antiproliferative and Apoptotic Effects of Sirtinol, a Sirtuin Inhibitor on Human Lung Cancer Cells by Modulating Akt/β-Catenin-Foxo3A Axis

1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan

2Department of Biotechnology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan

3Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, 70 Lien Hai Road, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan

4Department of Fragrance and Cosmetics Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan

5Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan

6Department of Biological Sciences and Technology, National University of Tainan, Tainan 700, Taiwan

7Translational Research Center, Cancer Center, Department of Medical Research, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan

Received 18 June 2014; Revised 29 June 2014; Accepted 30 June 2014; Published 12 August 2014

Academic Editor: Li-Yeh Chuang

Copyright © 2014 Yao Fong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Sirtuins, NAD+-dependent deacetylases, could target both histones and nonhistone proteins in mammalian cells. Sirt1 is the major sirtuin and has been shown to involve various cellular processes, including antiapoptosis, cellular senescence. Sirt1 was reported to be overexpressed in many cancers, including lung cancer. Sirtinol, a specific inhibitor of Sirt1, has been shown to induce apoptosis of cancer cells by elevating endogenous level of reactive oxygen species. In the study, we investigated the effect of sirtinol on the proliferation and apoptosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) H1299 cells. The results of proliferation assay and colony formation assay showed the antigrowth effect of sirtinol. The annexin-V staining further confirmed the apoptosis induction by sirtinol treatment. Interestingly, the levels of phosphorylated Akt and β-catenin were significantly downregulated with treating the apoptotic inducing doses. On the contrary, sirtinol treatment causes the significantly increased level of FoxO3a, a proapoptotic transcription factor targeted by Sirt1. These above results suggested that sirtinol may inhibit cell proliferation of H1299 cells by regulating the axis of Akt-β-catenin-FoxO3a. Overall, this study demonstrates that sirtinol attenuates the proliferation and induces apoptosis of NSCLC cells, indicating the potential treatment against NSCLC cells by inhibiting Sirt1 in future applications.

1. Introduction

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Lung cancer has higher mortality than other cancers in both men and women [1]. More than 80% of lung cancer patients are nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC can be classified by the location, including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell lung carcinoma [2, 3]. The treatment options for patients with NSCLC include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Chemotherapy is given as main treatment for more advanced cancers or for patients who are not healthy enough for surgery [4]. The chemotherapy for NSCLC treatment is developed and improved recently. However, the poor prognosis and drug resistance contribute to the low survival rate of NSCLC patients [5, 6].

Sirtuin (Sirt) family is a class III HDAC. In yeast, sirtuin protein plays an important role for lifespan extension in response to metabolic and other environmental stresses [710]. SIRT family proteins also target various nonhistone proteins including structural protein, signal intermediates, and transcription factors [11]. At least seven homologues (Sirt1–7) have been identified in mammalian cells [1214]. Among Sirt proteins, the physiological role of Sirt1 in mammalian cells has been reported to prevent tumorigenesis and ensure cellular longevity, and the continuous prevention of apoptosis may induce the tumorigenesis [15]. Previous studies showed that Sirt1 overexpression in cancer correlates with silencing of tumor suppressor genes [16].

Akt is a serine/threonine kinase which has been shown to be associated with proliferation and survival [17]. The overexpression and constitutively activation of Akt was observed in many cancers, including lung cancer [6] and breast cancer [5] cells, which are highly correlated with the chemoresistance of cancer cells. On the contrary, Forkhead box O3a (FoxO3a), a transcription factor, is the downstream target of Akt [17]. FoxO3a can promote anticell growth or apoptosis signaling through either inducing expression of the proapoptotic Bcl-2 such as Bim [18], stimulating the expression of death receptor ligands, including Fas ligand and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), or increasing the protein levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors [19]. Aberrant Akt-mediated phosphorylation of FoxO3a causes the survival and proliferation of cancer cells. Therefore, the signaling axis of Akt and FoxO3a regulates cell growth and survival may shed the light on developing a promising strategy for lung cancer treatment [17, 18, 20, 21].

The tumor suppressor forkhead family of transcription factors (FOXO) is one of SIRT1 substrate. The acetylation of FOXO3 increases in response to oxidative stress [22]. Therefore, FOXO3 could control the balance between stress resistance and apoptosis through its downstream targets such as GADD45 and Bim [23]. For example, Frazzi’s work reported that resveratrol-induced apoptosis of Hodgkin lymphoma cells is involved in the inhibition of SIRT1 and the hyperacetylation of FoxO3 [24].

In this study, we demonstrated antigrowth and apoptosis-inducing effect of sirtinol on lung cancer cells. The sirtinol-induced antiproliferation and apoptosis of lung cancer via FoxO3a-Akt were investigated and discussed.

2. Methods

2.1. Reagents

Sirtinol was purchased from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany). Sirtinol was dissolved in 100% DMSO at concentration of 10 mM and stored at −20°C until use. The following compounds were obtained from Gibco BRL (Maryland, USA): Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM), Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Mixture (F-12) fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypan blue, penicillin G, and streptomycin. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ribonuclease A (RNase A), and propidium iodide (PI) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Missouri, USA). Antibodies against FoxO3a were obtained from Epitomics (California, USA). Annexin V-FITC staining kit was purchased from Strong Biotech (Taipei, Taiwan). Antibodies against phospho-Akt, β-catenin, Sirt1, and β-actin were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (California, USA). Anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Pierce (Illinois, USA). The anti-rabbit Rhodamine-conjugated antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).

2.2. Cell Culture

Human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines H1299 were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Virginia, USA). All tested cells were maintained in DMEM/F-12 in 1 : 1 ratios (pH 7.4) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (100 units/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin). All cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.

2.3. Proliferation Assay

The cell proliferation of H1299 cells was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion assay [25] combined with Countess Automated Cell Counter performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Invitrogen; California, USA). 1 × 105 cells were seeded in 12-well plates and treated with indicated concentrations of sirtinol (0, 10, 20, and 50 μM) for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. After incubation, the cells were stained by 0.2% trypan blue and counted by Countess.

2.4. Apoptosis Assessment

To examine the apoptosis assessment of H1299 cells after being sirtinol treated, Annexin-V/PI double staining [26] was performed to detect the externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS). 3 × 105 cells were seeded onto a 6-well plate and incubated for 24 h and treated with different concentrations of sirtinol (0, 5, 10, 20, and 50 μM) for 24 h, respectively. Afterwards, cells were harvested and stained by Annexin-V staining kit (Strong Biotech, Taipei, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s manual. The cells were washed in 1 Annexin-V buffer (HEPES, NaCl, CaCl22H2O) and stained by Annexin-V for 30 min in 37°C water bath. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Calibur; Becton Dickinson; California, USA). The results of apoptosis assessment were analyzed by using the FlowJo software (Treestar, Inc.; California, USA).

2.5. Colony Formation Assay

100 cells were planted onto a 6-well plate, and, after 24 h incubation, the cells were treated with different concentrations of sirtinol (0, 10, 20, and 50 μM). After 15 days incubation, the colonies of cells were glutaraldehyde-fixed and stained with crystal violet (0.01% w/v) for 1 h. The diameter of colonies was determined by Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics; Maryland, USA).

2.6. Cell Cycle Analysis

3 × 105 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The cells were treated with different concentrations of sirtinol (0, 10, 20, and 50 μM) for 24 h. Then, the cells were harvested and fixed with ice-cold 75% ethanol for at least 24 h at −20°C. Ethanol-fixed cells were collected by centrifugation and washed with PBS. After centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in 500 μL PBS containing 2.5 μg/mL RNase A and incubated for 30 min in 37°C water bath. Then, the cells were centrifuged and stained by propidium iodide (PI) [27]. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The cell cycle distribution results were analyzed by using the FlowJo software [28].

2.7. Western Blot Analysis

6 × 105 cells were harvested and lysed with 1 × RIPA lysis buffer. Lysates were centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 30 min and the protein concentration in the supernatant was determined. 40 μg of protein was resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Afterwards, the proteins were electrotransferred to the nitrocellulose membrane (PALL; Michigan, USA) and blocked with 5% fat-free milk in PBS-T buffer (1 × PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h. Then the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against specific proteins overnight at 4°C. The blot was washed by PBS-T buffer and incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies for 90 min. The signals were detected by an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Amersham Piscataway; New Jersey, USA) [29].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Differences between DMSO- and sirtinol-treated cells were analyzed in at least triplicate experiments. The significance of the differences was analyzed by Student’s -test, with considered significantly.

3. Results

3.1. Sirtinol Exerts Antiproliferative Effect towards NSCLC Cells

We used sirtinol, a specific and direct inhibitor of the sirtuin class of deacetylase activity, to inhibit Sirt1 in H1299 cells [30]. To investigate the effect of sirtinol on cell proliferation, the NSCLC cell line H1299 was treated with different concentrations of sirtinol for 24 and 48 h, respectively. The cell viable cells were measured by trypan blue staining assay combined with automatic cell counter. The results of both cell proliferation assay and colony formation assay showed the antigrowth effect of sirtinol on NSCLC H1299 cells, especially at the dose of 20 and 50 μM sirtinol treatment (Figures 1 and 2). We also examined whether sirtinol induced NSCLC H1299 cells apoptosis. We treated the cells with different concentrations of sirtinol (0, 10, 20, and 50 μM) and then conducted the flow cytometry-based Annexin V and PI double staining assay. The cellular apoptosis was detected at high concentration of sirtinol treatment (Figure 4).

937051.fig.001
Figure 1: Effect of sirtinol on cellular proliferation of H1299 cells. H1299 cells treated with different concentrations (5, 10, 20 and 50 μM) of sirtinol for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. The cell survival was determined by the trypan blue staining assay combined with the Countess Automated Cell Counter. against vehicle control.
fig2
Figure 2: Sirtinol inhibits the colony formation of lung cancer cells. H1299 cells were treated with different concentrations (5, 10, 20 and 50 μM) of sirtinol for 15 days, respectively. Afterwards, the cells were glutaraldehyde-fixed and stained with Giemsa stain for 1 h. (a) The colony formation analysis of H1299 cells. (b) The quantification analysis of the colony diameter. Data are represented as mean ± SD (). compared with the vehicle control.
3.2. The Effect of Sirtinol on Regulating Cell Cycle Distribution of H1299 Cells

In previous study, Sirt1 has shown to exert the ability to induce cell cycle arrest and resistance to oxidative stress [31]. Therefore, we examined whether sirtinol induced NSCLC H1299 cell cycle disturbance. After sirtinol treatment, the cells were stained by PI, and detected the cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry (Figure 3). The result showed that the highest dose (50 μM) of sirtinol treatment induces G1-phase accumulation.

fig3
Figure 3: The effect of sirtinol on cell cycle distribution of lung cancer cells. H1299 cells treated with indicated concentrations (from 5 to 50 μM) of sirtinol for 24 h, respectively. Cells were stained with PI and detected the cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry. (a) Flow cytometry profile represents PI staining in -axis and cell number in -axis. (b) The quantitative analysis of cell cycle distribution. Different letter notations indicate the statistical significance between drug treatment and vehicle (a versus b and a versus c indicate the and 0.001, resp.).
fig4
Figure 4: Sirtinol induces apoptosis of H1299 cells. Cells were treated with indicated concentrations of sirtinol and stained with Annexin-V and PI at 24 h, respectively. (a) Flow cytometry profiling represents the results of Annexin-V-FITC staining. (b) The quantificative analysis of cell apoptosis. Different letter notations indicate the statistical significance between sirtinol treatment and vehicle (a versus b and a versus c indicate the and 0.001, resp.).
3.3. The Effect of Sirtinol on Modulating the Expression of Prosurvival Proteins

Sirt1 was reported to deacetylate various nonhistone protein targets, including p53, NF-κB, β-catenin, and FoxO3a [3234]. Because H1299 cells do not express the tumor suppressor p53 protein, we used Western blot to analyze the protein level of β-catenin, NF-κB p65, and FoxO3a after sirtinol treatment (Figure 5). NF-κB p65 is a critical transcription factor that regulates inflammation and cell proliferation and differentiation. NF-κB was reported to be aberrantly expressed and constitutively activated in lung cancer [35, 36]. However, the results of Western blot showed that no significant changes of NF-κB p65 protein levels were observed (data not shown), suggesting that the antiproliferative effect of sirtinol on lung cancer H1299 cells is NF-κB p65-independent. On the contrary, the previous study showed that sirt1 plays a tumor suppressive role mediated through inhibition of β-catenin [37]. The protein level of β-catenin was decreased only in cytotoxic concentrations 20 and 50 μM, suggesting that β-catenin did not involve in Sirt1-induced cells invasiveness, and Sirt1 may play a role as a tumor promoter in H1299 cells.

937051.fig.005
Figure 5: Modulation of protein levels in NSCLC H1299 cells after sirtinol treatment. H1299 cells treated with indicated concentrations (10, 20, and 50 μM) of sirtinol for 24 h, respectively. The results of Western blot of Sirt1 nonhistone target protein, including FoxO3a, Akt phosphorylation, and β-catenin. β-Actin as an internal control.

The transcription factor FoxO3a has a crucial role in mediating the cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of anticancer drug [38, 39]. Recent study suggested that FoxO3a may be a major mediator for the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin in lung cancer cells [40]. More recently, Zheng’s work demonstrated that ectopic expression of FoxO3a enhanced expression and berberine, a compound derived from traditional Chinese medicine-induced apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma cells [41], indicating the important role of FoxO3a in the initiation of apoptosis in cancer cells.

Furthermore, FoxO3a is a well-known nonhistone target of Sirt1. It has been reported that Sirt1 would deacetylate and repress FoxO3a activity and reduce forkhead-dependent apoptosis [23]. In the result of Western blot, FoxO3a was increased after sirtinol treatment, suggesting that Sirt1 represses the protein level of FoxO3a in NSCLC H1299 cells.

We next examined the proteins that involve in cellular proliferation and metastasis protein, including the phosphorylation of Akt [4244] (Figure 5). The phosphorylation of levels of Akt was decreased only in cytotoxic concentrations 20 and 50 μM, suggesting that Akt did not involve in sirtinol-induced inhibition of cells’ invasiveness but the apoptosis pathway.

4. Discussion

Sirt1 has been shown to be involved in a variety of biological processes, including transcriptional silencing, stress responses, aging, apoptosis, tumorigenesis, and cellular metabolism [45, 46]. It targets diverse histone and various nonhistone proteins including structural protein, signal intermediates, and transcription factors, such as α-tubulin, p53 [4749], FoxO [20, 23, 31], E2F1 [50], NF-κB [51, 52], and Ku70 [53]. Additionally, Sirt1 has been shown to overexpress in several cancer cells, including breast, prostate, ovarian, and colon cancer cell lines [46, 5458]. Recent studies showed the tumorigenicity role of Sirt1. For example, Sirt1 was reported to promote cell migration and invasion of prostate cancer [59, 60]. Consistently, our preliminary result also showed that Sirt1 would overexpress in NSCLC cell lines (data not shown).

The production of ROS has been resulted in cellular damage and genomic instability [61]. Furthermore, many anticancer drugs could induce apoptosis by increasing the level of endogenous ROS in the cancer cells [62, 63]. Recent study showed that sirtinol treatment induces the apoptosis of lung carcinoma 549 cells by increasing the level of endogenous ROS [64].

Accordingly, we proposed the positive role of Sirt1 in the progression of NSCLC cells. We used sirtinol, a specific inhibitor of sirtuin, to inhibit Sirt1. Our results showed that sirtinol exerts a significant cytotoxicity towards NSCLC H1299 cells with a dose-responsive manner (20 and 50 μM). The Western results showed that sirtinol-induced inhibition of Sirt1 resulted in the increased transcription factor FoxO3a. These above results suggest a close correlation of sirtinol-induced antilung cancer and the regulation of Akt-FoxO3a signaling pathway (Figure 6).

937051.fig.006
Figure 6: Possible model of sirtinol-induced antiproliferation and apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Sirtinol downregulates the activation of prosurvival Akt serine/threonine kinase and the protein level of β-catenin, a proliferation-associated transcription factor, insulting in the cell cycle G1-phase accumulation and the growth arrest. On the contrary, sirtinol treatment causes the upregulation of the proapoptotic transcription factor FoxO3a, a target of both Akt signaling and Sirt1. This may render H1299 cells more sensitive to apoptosis. Finally, sirtinol induces the apoptosis of lung cancer cells.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we used sirtinol, a specific inhibitor of Sirt1, to investigate the role of Sirt1 in the apoptosis and proliferation of H1299 cells. Sirtinol treatment causes the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of lung cancer cells. Furthermore, sirtinol-induced inhibition of Sirt1 activity may increase the protein levels of the transcription factor Foxoa3a whereas it downregulates the activation of Akt and the protein level of β-catenin after sirtinol treatment. Our recent work suggests that sirtinol-induced antiproliferation and apoptosis of lung cancer cells may be correlated with Akt-FoxO3a signaling pathway (Figure 6).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The study was financially supported by Grant no. NSC101-2320-B-037-046-MY3 from the National Science Council, Taiwan, Grant nos. 101-CM-KMU-11 and 102-CM-KMU-09 from the ChiMei-KMU Joint Research Project, Grant no. NSYSUKMU102-P031 from the NSYSU-KMU Joint Research Project, and Grant no. MOHW103-TD-B-111-05 from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.

References

  1. M. Heron, “Deaths: leading causes for 2008,” National Vital Statistics Reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1–94, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. L. Longo, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  3. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2012,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 10–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Burdett, R. Stephens, L. Stewart et al., “Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials—NSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 28, pp. 4617–4625, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Pirker and W. Minar, “Chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,” Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, vol. 42, pp. 157–163, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. D. Wagner and G. Y. Yang, “The role of chemotherapy and radiation in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC),” Current Drug Targets, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. T. Howitz, K. J. Bitterman, H. Y. Cohen et al., “Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6954, pp. 191–196, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Guarente and F. Picard, “Calorie restriction—the SIR2 connection,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 473–482, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. D. Longo and B. K. Kennedy, “Sirtuins in aging and age-related disease,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 257–268, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Fontana, L. Partridge, and V. D. Longo, “Extending healthy life span—from yeast to humans,” Science, vol. 328, no. 5976, pp. 321–326, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Olmos, J. J. Brosens, and E. W. F. Lam, “Interplay between SIRT proteins and tumour suppressor transcription factors in chemotherapeutic resistance of cancer,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. C. Haigis and D. A. Sinclair, “Mammalian sirtuins: biological insights and disease relevance,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 5, pp. 253–295, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Cen, D. Y. Youn, and A. A. Sauve, “Advances in characterization of human sirtuin isoforms: chemistries, targets and therapeutic applications,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 1919–1935, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Horio, T. Hayashi, A. Kuno, and R. Kunimoto, “Cellular and molecular effects of sirtuins in health and disease,” Clinical Science, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 191–203, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. L. Brooks and W. Gu, “How does SIRT1 affect metabolism, senescence and cancer?” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Pruitt, R. L. Zinn, J. E. Ohm et al., “Inhibition of SIRT1 reactivates silenced cancer genes without loss of promoter DNA hypermethylation,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 2, no. 3, article e40, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Zhang, N. Tang, T. J. Hadden, and A. K. Rishi, “Akt, FoxO and regulation of apoptosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1813, no. 11, pp. 1978–1986, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Lv, S. Song, K. Zhang, H. Gao, and R. Ma, “CHIP regulates AKT/FoxO/Bim signaling in MCF7 and MCF10A cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e83312, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Seoane, H. Le, L. Shen, S. A. Anderson, and J. Massagué, “Integration of smad and forkhead pathways in the control of neuroepithelial and glioblastoma cell proliferation,” Cell, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 211–223, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Hariharan, Y. Maejima, J. Nakae, J. Paik, R. A. Depinho, and J. Sadoshima, “Deacetylation of FoxO by Sirt1 plays an essential role in mediating starvation-induced autophagy in cardiac myocytes,” Circulation Research, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 1470–1482, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Wu, B. Jin, L. Chen et al., “MiR-30d induces apoptosis and is regulated by the Akt/FOXO pathway in renal cell carcinoma,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1212–1221, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Brunet, L. B. Sweeney, J. F. Sturgill et al., “Stress-Dependent Regulation of FOXO Transcription Factors by the SIRT1 Deacetylase,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5666, pp. 2011–2015, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. C. Motta, N. Divecha, M. Lemieux et al., “Mammalian SIRT1 represses forkhead transcription factors,” Cell, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 551–563, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Frazzi, R. Valli, I. Tamagnini, B. Casali, N. Latruffe, and F. Merli, “Resveratrol-mediated apoptosis of hodgkin lymphoma cells involves SIRT1 inhibition and FOXO3a hyperacetylation,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 1013–1021, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Yen, C. Chiu, R. Haung et al., “Antiproliferative effects of goniothalamin on Ca9-22 oral cancer cells through apoptosis, DNA damage and ROS induction,” Mutation Research—Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, vol. 747, no. 2, pp. 253–258, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Chiu, P. Liu, K. Huang et al., “Goniothalamin inhibits growth of human lung cancer cells through DNA damage, apoptosis, and reduced migration ability,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 4288–4293, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. C. Chiu, H. W. Chang, D. W. Chuang et al., “Fern plant-derived protoapigenone leads to DNA damage, apoptosis, and g2/m arrest in lung cancer cell line H1299,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 501–506, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Bonetta, “Flow cytometry smaller and better,” Nature Methods, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 785–794, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Chiu, J. Haung, F. Chang et al., “Golden berry-derived 4β-hydroxywithanolide E for selectively killing oral cancer cells by generating ROS, DNA damage, and apoptotic pathways,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e64739, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Ota, E. Tokunaga, K. Chang et al., “Sirt1 inhibitor, Sirtinol, induces senescence-like growth arrest with attenuated Ras-MAPK signaling in human cancer cells,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 176–185, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Brunet, L. B. Sweeney, J. F. Sturgill et al., “Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the sirt1 deacetylase,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5666, pp. 2011–2015, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Vaziri, S. K. Dessain, E. N. Eaton et al., “hSIR2SIRT1 functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase,” Cell, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 149–159, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. X. Deng, “SIRT1, is it a tumor promoter or tumor suppressor?” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147–152, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Nemoto, M. M. Fergusson, and T. Finkel, “Nutrient availability regulates SIRT1 through a forkhead-dependent pathway,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5704, pp. 2105–2108, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y. Saitoh, V. J. Martínez Bruyn, S. Uota et al., “Overexpression of NF-κB inducing kinase underlies constitutive NF-κB activation in lung cancer cells,” Lung Cancer, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 263–270, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. X. Tang, D. Liu, S. Shishodia et al., “Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is frequently expressed in lung cancer and preneoplastic lesions,” Cancer, vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 2637–2646, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Firestein, G. Blander, S. Michan et al., “The SIRT1 deacetylase suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis and colon cancer growth,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 4, Article ID e2020, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. R. Gomes, J. J. Brosens, and E. W.-F. Lam, “Resist or die: FOXO transcription factors determine the cellular response to chemotherapy,” Cell Cycle, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 3133–3136, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. S. Myatt and E. W.-F. Lam, “The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 847–859, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Liu, J. Yin, C. Wang, Y. Gu, M. Deng, and Z. He, “FOXO3a mediates the cytotoxic effects of cisplatin in lung cancer cells,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 898–907, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. F. Zheng, Q. Tang, J. Wu et al., “p38alpha MAPK-mediated induction and interaction of FOXO3a and p53 contribute to the inhibited-growth and induced-apoptosis of human lung adenocarcinoma cells by berberine,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 36, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  42. K. Kamitori, M. Tanaka, T. Okuno-Hirasawa, and S. Kohsaka, “Receptor related to tyrosine kinase RYK regulates cell migration during cortical development,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 330, no. 2, pp. 446–453, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Morales-Ruiz, D. Fulton, G. Sowa et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor-stimulated actin reorganization and migration of endothelial cells is regulated via the serine/threonine kinase Akt,” Circulation Research, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 892–896, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Huang, J. Liu, C. C. Haudenschild, and X. Zhan, “The role of tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin in the locomotion of endothelial cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 40, pp. 25770–25776, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. Inoue, M. Hiratsuka, M. Osaki, and M. Oshimura, “The molecular biology of mammalian SIRT proteins: SIRT2 in cell cycle regulation,” Cell Cycle, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1011–1018, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. W. Stünkel and R. M. Campbell, “Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1): the misunderstood HDAC,” Journal of Biomolecular Screening, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1153–1169, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Luo, A. Y. Nikolaev, S. Imai et al., “Negative control of p53 by Sir2α promotes cell survival under stress,” Cell, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 137–148, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. E. Langley, M. Pearson, M. Faretta et al., “Human SIR2 deacetylates p53 and antagonizes PML/p53-induced cellular senescence,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2383–2396, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Yi and J. Luo, “SIRT1 and p53, effect on cancer, senescence and beyond,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1804, no. 8, pp. 1684–1689, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. Wang, L. Chen, X. Hou et al., “Interactions between E2F1 and SirT1 regulate apoptotic response to DNA damage,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1025–1031, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. Chen, W. Fischle, E. Verdin, and W. C. Greene, “Duration of nuclear NF-κB action regulated by reversible acetylation,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5535, pp. 1653–1657, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Salminen, J. Ojala, J. Huuskonen, A. Kauppinen, T. Suuronen, and K. Kaarniranta, “Interaction of aging-associated signaling cascades: inhibition of NF-κB signaling by longevity factors FoxOs and SIRT1,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 65, no. 7-8, pp. 1049–1058, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. Jeong, K. Juhn, H. Lee et al., “SIRT1 promotes DNA repair activity and deacetylation of Ku70,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. W. Stünkel, B. K. Peh, Y. C. Tan et al., “Function of the SIRTI protein deacetylase in cancer,” Biotechnology Journal, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1360–1368, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. K. Y. Jang, K. S. Kim, S. H. Hwang et al., “Expression and prognostic significance of SIRT1 in ovarian epithelial tumours,” Pathology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 366–371, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. Kabra, Z. Li, L. Chen et al., “SirT1 is an inhibitor of proliferation and tumor formation in colon cancer,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 27, pp. 18210–18217, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. K. Nosho, K. Shima, N. Irahara et al., “SIRT1 histone deacetylase expression is associated with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer,” Modern Pathology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 922–932, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. Wang, M. K. Hasan, E. Alvarado, H. Yuan, H. Wu, and W. Y. Chen, “NAMPT overexpression in prostate cancer and its contribution to tumor cell survival and stress response,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 907–921, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, H. Dong et al., “Deacetylation of cortactin by SIRT1 promotes cell migration.,” Oncogene, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 445–460, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. K. Nakane, Y. Fujita, R. Terazawa et al., “Inhibition of cortactin and SIRT1 expression attenuates migration and invasion of prostate cancer DU145 cells,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. Lee, M. Hou, H. Huang et al., “Marine algal natural products with anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer properties,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 13, no. 1, article 55, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H.-U. Simon, A. Haj-Yehia, and F. Levi-Schaffer, “Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction,” Apoptosis, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 415–418, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. L. Khandrika, B. Kumar, S. Koul, P. Maroni, and H. K. Koul, “Oxidative stress in prostate cancer,” Cancer Letters, vol. 282, no. 2, pp. 125–136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Pal, B. S. Shankar, and K. B. Sainis, “Cytokines from the tumor microenvironment modulate sirtinol cytotoxicity in A549 lung carcinoma cells,” Cytokine, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 196–207, 2013. View at Google Scholar