Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7493286 | 17 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7493286

Spinal Cord Glycine Transporter 2 Mediates Bilateral ST35 Acupoints Sensitization in Rats with Knee Osteoarthritis

Academic Editor: Ipek Goktepe
Received30 Aug 2018
Revised16 Dec 2018
Accepted17 Jan 2019
Published07 Feb 2019

Abstract

The concept of “acupoint sensitization” refers to the functional status of acupoint switches from silent to active under pathological conditions. In clinic, acupoint sensitization provides important guidance for acupoints selection in different diseases. However, the mechanism behind this phenomenon remains unclear. We generated a model of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) by intra-articular injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) into the left knee of rats. The paw withdrawal mechanical threshold (PWMT) and the total number of mast cells as well as mast cell degranulation rate (MCDR) of acupoint tissue were used to test whether the acupoints were sensitized. The results showed that KOA resulted in a reduced mechanical threshold and elevated total number of mast cell as well as mast cell degranulation rate at bilateral ST35 (Dubi) but not GB37 (Guangming) or nonacupoint area. The acupoint sensitization was accompanied by upregulation of glycine transporter 2 (GlyT2) and reduction of extracellular glycine levels in the bilateral dorsal horns of the spinal cord at L3-5. Selective inhibition of GlyT2 or intrathecal administration of glycine attenuated ST35 acupoint sensitization. The sensitization of bilateral ST35 was blocked after intraspinal GlyT2 short hairpin (sh) RNA (GlyT2-shRNA) microinjection to specifically downregulate GlyT2 expression in the left side (ipsilateral) L3-5 spinal cord dorsal horn before MIA injection. Moreover, electroacupuncture (EA) stimulation at ST35 ameliorated articular pathological lesions and improved KOA-related pain behaviors. GlyT2-shRNA injection reversed EA-induced pain relief but not EA-induced reduction of joint lesions. Overall, this study demonstrated that spinal GlyT2, especially elevated GlyT2 expression in the ipsilateral dorsal horn of the spinal cord, is a crucial mediator of ST35 acupoint sensitization in KOA rats.

1. Introduction

Acupoints are special sites on the body surface or under the skin along the meridians. The functional status of certain acupoints switches from silent to active when the body is under pathological conditions. This phenomenon is called “acupoint sensitization” [1, 2]. Specifically, when disease strikes, responsive acupoints will appear to have increased sensitivity to pressure, heat, light, or electric stimuli, and the therapeutic effects of acupuncture or moxibustion at sensitized acupoints will be enhanced. Acupoint sensitization provides important guidance for acupoints selection in clinical practice. However, the mechanism behind this phenomenon remains unclear.

Given that acupoint sensitization is mainly manifested through sensory changes, the nervous system is presumed to play a major part in this phenomenon. It has been reported that noxious visceral stimuli intensify the functional responses to stimulation at acupoints [3]. The discharge frequency of neurons in the ventral posterior lateral (VPL) nucleus was increased when stimulation at the “Zusanli-Shangjuxu” acupoints was applied to rats with colorectal distension compared to normal rats [3]. This result indicates that central nervous system (CNS) sensitization may be involved in acupoint sensitization. Glycine is an important inhibitory neurotransmitter in the spinal cord. Reduction of spinal glycinergic neurotransmitters may contribute to central sensitization [4]. Since the concentration of glycine in the synaptic cleft is modulated by glycine transporter 1/2 (GlyT1 and GlyT2) [5], alteration of their function or expression may have significant effects on acupoint sensitization. Therefore, the aim of this study was to reveal whether changes in the spinal cord dorsal horn, especially the glycinergic system, are involved in the initiation of acupoint sensitization in a rat model of KOA.

KOA is a type of joint diseases that results from breakdown of knee joint cartilage and underlying bone. Globally, as of 2010, approximately 250 million people had osteoarthritis of the knee [6, 7]. The prevalence, disability, and associated costs of KOA are expected to continue growing over the next 25 years because of the aging of society [8, 9]. Acupuncture has been widely verified to be effective in slowing the progression and relieving pain for KOA patients by randomized controlled trials [10, 11] and systematic reviews [1214]. The phenomenon of acupoint sensitization has been described in a rat model of KOA [15]. The current study employed KOA as disease model to explore whether GlyT1/2 is involved in the development of acupoint sensitization during KOA, providing new insights into the mechanism of peripheric acupoint sensitization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Left Side KOA Model

Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200-250 g were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. Rats were housed in standard breeding cages and maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle at 21 ± 2°C with food and water ad libitum. All animal procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China) and in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

The unilateral KOA rat model was described in more details in our previous report [16]. Briefly, all surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia with 1.5% isoflurane in oxygen. One milligram of MIA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in 50 μL sterile saline [17]. In the left knee, a single intra-articular injection of 1 mg MIA was performed by inserting a 31-gauge needle through the infrapatellar ligament into the joint space. Animals in the control group received 50 μL saline instead.

2.2. Behavioral Tests

PWMT test: Mechanical hyperalgesia was determined by measuring the incidence of foot withdrawal in response to mechanical stimulation of the plantar surface of left side (ipsilateral) hind paw using a sharp, cylindrical probe with a uniform tip diameter of approximately 0.2 mm (ALMEMO 2390-5 Electronic von Frey Anesthesiometer; IITC Life Science, USA). Each rat was tested six times, and the mean value was defined as the PWMT of the tested subject [18].

Measurement of weight-bearing deficit: Briefly, changes in weight bearing were measured using a weight in capacitance tester (IITC Incapacitance Meter, USA) as previously described [16]. We documented five measurements of the weight borne on each hind paw. The percentage of ipsilateral weight bearing was calculated as [(weight borne on ipsilateral paw/sum of the weight borne on the ipsilateral and contralateral paws) × 100%]. The mean value of the 5 tests was obtained as the weight born of the tested rat.

Acupoint sensitization tests: A sharp, cylindrical probe with a uniform tip diameter of approximately 0.2 mm (ALMEMO 2390-5 Electronic von Frey Anesthesiometer; IITC Life Science, USA) was used. Acupoints mechanical threshold were determined by measuring the incidence of foot withdrawal in response to mechanical indentation of the ST35, nonsensitized acupoints GB37, and a nonacupoint area (located 5 mm behind the ST35) on bilateral hind limbs. The acupoints chosen for behavioral testing were based on traditional Chinese medicine meridian theory [16, 19]. The probe was separately applied to 6 designated acupoints distributed over the bilateral hind limbs surface (Figure 1(b)). The minimal force (in grams) that induced paw withdrawal was read off the display. The mechanical threshold of acupoint was calculated as the mean of the 6 readings. All behavior tests were examined by two independent and blinded investigators.

2.3. EA Treatment

EA treatment was performed as previously described in our report [16]. Awake rats were restrained gently in an immobilization apparatus with their hind limbs exposed and hind paws on the floor. The rats were acclimatized in this apparatus for 30 min per day on 3 consecutive days before tests. Two acupuncture needles were inserted into the bilateral ST35 and stimulated with 1 mA, 2/15 Hz electric current for 30 min (SDZ-V Huatuo Electroacupuncture Instrument, Suzhou Medical Appliances Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). For sham EA, the needles were inserted superficially into the subcutaneous layer at nonacupoints (localized 5 mm behind the ST35) without electrical stimulation. EA or sham EA was given once per day for 6 consecutive days followed by a 1-day break for 2 weeks.

2.4. Immunohistochemical Staining

Rats were decapitated under deep anesthesia after the last behavioral test and at 14 days after MIA injection, and skin samples of 1.5×1.5×1.5 mm3 at the ST35, GB37, and nonacupoint control area [15] were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). The tissues were then dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned into 5 μm thick slices. Subsequently, the sections were dewaxed, dehydrated, and stained in 0.5% toluidine blue for 30 min and then washed with tap water. After vitrification with dimethylbenzene and neutral balata fixation, the sections were observed under a light microscope (BX51, Olympus Corporation, Japan). Mast cell degranulation was defined as >10% of the granules exhibiting fusion or discharge and, for each acupoint, the total number of mast cells and degranulated mast cells were counted in five separate fields under 40 × magnification and the sum was used to represent the number per animal. Samples from 6 animals were used [15, 20]. The percentage of degranulated mast cells was calculated as [(degranulated mast cells/sum of the number of mast cells) × 100%]. The results were expressed as the total number of mast cells and the percentage of mast cell degranulation.

2.5. Joint Pathology

Rats were decapitated under deep anesthesia, and left knee joints were dissected and fixed with 4% PFA for 24 h. The explanted joints were decalcified in formic acid (5%) with 20% EDTA for 3 weeks before incubation with ammonia solution for 30 min to ensure neutralization and rinsed in water for 24 h. After that, the joints were dehydrated using an ascending ethanol series and embedded in paraffin. The samples were coronally sectioned to a thickness of 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). According to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) 0-24 point score system, the progression depth of osteoarthritis into cartilage and the completeness of the articular surface were evaluated by two independent investigators [21]. All sections were counted by an experimenter blinded to the treatment groups.

2.6. Jugular Catheter and Drug Administration

Rats were anesthetized and placed in a supine position, and the skin of the right ventral side of the neck and clavicle area were shaved and sterilized. A 1-2 cm incision was made lateral to the trachea, and the jugular vein was exposed and dissected. A 4-0 silk suture was placed posterior to the vein with a PE10 catheter inserted into the superior vena cava and the suture tightened around it to stop bleeding. Then, the incision was closed with 3-0 monofilament suture [22]. The other side of the catheter was tunneled under the skin to the dorsal cervical region, flushed with saline, and sealed with a cautery pen. One mg/kg GlyT2 inhibitor, ORG25543, was intravenously delivered through the catheter once every 48 h after MIA injection for KOA model establishment. Drugs were administered a total of 7 times during the 14-day period [2325].

2.7. Intrathecal Catheter Implantation and Glycine Infusion

Rats were anesthetized and placed on a stereotactic frame in the prone position. The skin was shaved and sterilized, and a midline skin incision (2-3 cm) was made at the lumbar enlargement. The superficial muscle was dissected from the spinous process. A saline-filled PE-10 was inserted into the subarachnoid space between L5 and L6, embedded through a tunnel under the skin through up to the back of the neck, and connected with a microinjection pump (ALZET Miniosmotic pump, model 2002, USA). A minipump was implanted subcutaneously at the back of the neck and connected to the tube and pumping glycine or saline at a rate of 0.5 μL/h for 14 days. Glycine was dissolved in saline (0.9%) at a concentration of 0.2 mol/L.

2.8. Spinal Cord Microdialysis

Rats were anesthetized, and the core body temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C using a homeothermic blanket (Xi’an Wandong Instrument Co., Ltd., China). Rats were placed on a stereotactic frame in the prone position. The skin of the dorsal aspect of the lumbar enlargement was shaved and sterilized. A midline incision was made, and muscle was separated from the spinous process. Then, the vertebra of L3 was held immobilized using a spinal clamp. A microdialysis probe was inserted into the spinal cord 0.6 mm lateral to the midline at an angle of 16° from the horizontal [26]. A dialysis membrane (TP-100-10, Eicom, Japan) of 1.5 mm length was inserted into the dorsal horn of the L3-L5 lumbar region of the spinal cord. The probe was perfused with an artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF: 140.0 mM NaCl, 3.0 mM KCl, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM Na2HPO4, 0.27 mM NaH2PO4, and pH 7.4). Dialysates in bilateral dorsal horns of spinal cord were collected at a rate of 2 μL/min for 30 min after 120 min equilibration. The concentration of glycine was detected with fluorescence by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [26].

2.9. Western Blot Analysis

Rats were decapitated under deep anesthesia, and the lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord was removed. The dorsal horn region of the spinal cord was horizontally separated with a vibratome in ice-cold ACSF. Then, the left side (ipsilateral KOA) and right side (contralateral KOA) of the spinal cord dorsal horn were collected. Samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until use. Tissue was homogenized in RIPA buffer containing 1% protease cocktail inhibitor (Sigma, USA) on ice for 10 min and then centrifuged at 12000 rpm/min at 4°C for 20 min, and supernatants were collected. Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Sigma, USA). Thirty micrograms of protein samples was loaded for electrophoresis and then transferred onto a 0.45 μm PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare). The membranes were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin for 1 h followed by incubation with polyclonal rabbit anti-GlyT1 (1:200; Alomone labs, Israel), polyclonal rabbit anti-GlyT2 (1:1000; SYSY, Germany), polyclonal rabbit anti-c-Fos (1:1500; SYSY, Germany), or polyclonal rabbit anti-β-actin (1:1000; GeneTex, USA) primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The membranes were rinsed 10 min × 3 times followed by incubation with goat-anti-rabbit antibody (1:4000; GeneTex, USA) secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and rinsed 10 min × 3 times before application of luminal reagent (Millipore, Germany) for visualization. Each sample was independently tested three times.

2.10. Immunofluorescent Staining

On the fourteenth day after MIA injection, rats were anesthetized and transcardially perfused with ice-cold saline (0.9%) followed by 4% PFA in 1 × phosphate buffered solution (PBS). The lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord was removed and fixed in 4% PFA for 24 h. Then, the samples were gradually dehydrated in a gradient sucrose of 20% and 30%. Thirty-micron-thick transverse sections were incubated with 10% normal goat serum for 1 h. After blocking, sections were probed with polyclonal guinea pig anti-GlyT2 (1:1500; SYSY, Germany) or polyclonal rabbit anti-c-Fos (1:1500; SYSY, Germany) antibodies in 1% bovine serum albumin-PBS overnight at 4°C in a humidified box. After washing in PBS for 10 min × 3 times, the secondary antibodies (594 goat anti-rabbit lgG, 1:500; 488 goat anti-guinea pig lgG, 1:500; Life Technologies, USA) were applied onto the slides for 1 h at 37°C. Finally, sections were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51, Japan).

2.11. Intraspinal Microinjection for Virus Administration

To specifically knockdown GlyT2 expression in the ipsilateral spinal cord, we constructed recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) containing full-length rat GlyT2 short hairpin (sh) RNA (GlyT2-shRNA) or a negative control-shRNA (Con-shRNA), which also carried an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and was injected into the ipsilateral L3-L5 spinal cord dorsal horn (Shanghai Taitool Bioscience Co., Ltd., China). A laminectomy was performed to expose the dorsal horn of the L3-L5. The coordinate was 0.7 mm left to the midline at a depth of 0.4 mm [27]. One microliter of GlyT2-shRNA (2 × 1012 vg/ml) was injected into two ipsilateral intervertebral spaces (L3/L4 and L4/L5) using a glass micropipette at a rate of 46 nL/min. In control group, 1 μl of Con-shRNA was also injected into the same sites. Ten minutes after the injection was finished, and micropipettes were slowly retracted.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM for behavioral results and the mean ± SD for OARSI scores. Using GraphPad Prism 6.02 software, pain behaviors were analyzed with two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. One-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used for mast cells, western blot, and immunofluorescent staining analysis when four groups were compared. Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post hoc Dunn’s tests was used for OARSI score analysis in four group comparisons. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Left Knee Osteoarthritis Induces Bilateral ST35 Acupoints Sensitization

To determine whether KOA induces certain acupoint sensitization, PWMT, the total number of mast cells, and the MCDR at a related acupoint (ST35), an irrelevant acupoint (GB37) and a nonacupoint control were assessed (Figure 1(b)). Bilateral PWMTs of ST35 were significantly reduced at days 3, 7, and 14 after MIA intra-articular injection in the left side knee (Figure 1(c)). However, the PWMT of GB37 and the nonacupoint groups remained unchanged (Figures 1(d) and 1(e)). Compared to control rats, the total number of mast cells and the MCDR at bilateral ST35 were significantly increased in KOA rats. However, the total number of mast cells and MCDR at bilateral GB37 and nonacupoints were similar to that of control rats (Figures 1(f) and 1(g)). According to traditional Chinese medicine theory, acupuncture at sensitized acupoints can produce optimum therapeutic effects. Therefore, we applied EA or sham EA treatment at bilateral ST35 and assessed pain-related behaviors. The results showed that EA at the sensitized acupoint (ST35) increased the PWMT and alleviated the weight-bearing deficiency in the ipsilateral hind limb of rats (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). Moreover, EA improved pathological changes in the ipsilateral knee and decreased the OARSI score after 14 days of treatment (Figures 2(b) and 2(e)).

3.2. Left Knee Osteoarthritis Increases c-Fos Expression in Bilateral L3-5 Spinal Cord Dorsal Horns

Spinal sensitization was determined by measuring c-Fos expression in laminae I-III of the bilateral spinal cord dorsal horns. Immunofluorescent staining showed that KOA induced a robust increase in c-Fos expression in laminae I-III of bilateral L3-5 spinal cord dorsal horns at 14 days after MIA injection (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Consistently, Western blot revealed that the c-Fos protein level in bilateral spinal cord dorsal horns was significantly increased in KOA animals compared to control rats (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)).

3.3. Extracellular Glycine Concentration Reduction Contributes to Acupoint Sensitization

To investigate whether glycine concentration in the extracellular area was changed after MIA injection, we used microdialysis to analyze the concentration of glycine in the extracellular dialysates on each side of the L3-L5 spinal dorsal horn. The results showed that the extracellular glycine concentration was decreased in the bilateral spinal cord dorsal horns at 14 days after MIA injection (Figure 4(b)), suggesting that the extracellular glycine content may play an important role in central sensitization.

Next, we sought to investigate whether acupoint sensitization was induced by extracellular glycine reduction in the spinal cord. Using a minipump, we infused glycine intrathecally at a speed of 0.1 μmol/h in the spinal lumbar enlargement for 14 days, and the PWMTs of bilateral ST35 acupoints were significantly higher than that in saline infusion animals. However, the mechanical thresholds of GB37 and nonacupoint did not change after glycine infusion (Figures 4(c)4(e)). The total number of mast cells and the MCDR of bilateral ST35 acupoints were significantly decreased after glycine infusion. However, no such variation was observed on either side of GB37 or nonacupoint area in saline-infused rats (Figures 4(f) and 4(g)). These results demonstrated that increased extracellular glycine could reverse the sensitization of bilateral ST35 without affecting the PWMT and the total number of mast cells or MCDR of nonsensitized acupoint.

3.4. GlyT2 but Not GlyT1 May Be Involved in the ST35 Sensitization in the Left KOA Rats

Considering that glycine clearance and reuptake were carried out by glycine transporters (GlyT1/2), we next examined the expression of GlyT1/2 in the bilateral dorsal horns of spinal cord at 14 days after MIA injection. The results showed that the expression of GlyT1 was not changed in the bilateral spinal cord dorsal horns in KOA compared to control group (Figure 5(a)). However, GlyT2 was significantly increased in the bilateral spinal cord dorsal horns in rats from the KOA group (Figure 5(b)). This observation was further confirmed by fluorescent staining of GlyT2 expression (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)). Taken together, these results indicated that GlyT2, but not GlyT1, may be involved in the formation of central sensitization in KOA rats.

3.5. ST35 Sensitization Is Attenuated by ORG25543, a Selective Inhibitor of GlyT2

GlyT2 is crucial for glycine reuptake into the presynaptic cytosol for refilling synaptic vesicles. Increased GlyT2 expression may lead to increased uptake of glycine from the synaptic cleft. Our results showed that intermittent intravenous injection of a GlyT2 selective inhibitor, ORG25543, significantly reversed the PWMT reduction of bilateral ST35 acupoints in KOA rats but did not affect the PWMT in GB37 or nonacupoint groups (Figures 6(b)6(d)). Meanwhile, ORG25543 injection reduced the total number of mast cells and the MCDR at bilateral ST35, but not at bilateral GB37 or nonacupoint areas (Figures 6(f) and 6(g)) in KOA rats. The bilateral extracellular glycine concentrations were also increased after ORG25543 infusion in KOA rats (Figure 6(e)).

3.6. Downregulation of GlyT2 at the Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn Suppresses Acupoint Sensitization

To further confirm the role of GlyT2 at the spinal dorsal horn in the regulation of acupoint sensitization, GlyT2-shRNA or Con-shRNA was injected to the left side of spinal cord dorsal horn at 21 days before MIA injection. Immunofluorescence confirmed that the GlyT2-shRNA (green fluorescence) localization was limited to cells on side of the spinal dorsal horn, and the protein level of GlyT2 on the left side decreased by almost 73% in the GlyT2-shRNA group compared to control group in normal rats (Figures 7(b) and 7(c)). However, the protein level of GlyT2 on the right side of the spinal dorsal horn in the GlyT2-shRNA group did not change in normal rats. Interestingly, GlyT2 was decreased at bilateral dorsal horns of spinal cord after unilateral (left) GlyT2-shRNA injection in KOA rats (Figure 7(d)). The extracellular glycine concentration was increased in the GlyT2-shRNA group after MIA injection (Figure 7(e)). The PWMTs of bilateral ST35 was also significantly elevated in the GlyT2-shRNA group compared to the Con-shRNA group (Figure 7(f)). For the nonsensitized acupoint GB37 and nonacupoint area, PWMT in the GlyT2-shRNA group was similar to that of the Con-shRNA group (Figures 7(g) and 7(h)). Consistently, GlyT2-shRNA reduced the number of mast cells and the MCDR in bilateral ST35 areas but not GB37 or nonacupoint areas (Figures 7(i) and 7(j)).

To further verify the acupoint function of sensitized ST35 during EA treatment for KOA, we applied EA treatment at bilateral ST35 acupoints to animals that accepted ipsilateral intraspinal injection of GlyT2-shRNA or control virus before KOA. The results showed that GlyT2-shRNA reversed the pain behavior alleviation induced by EA treatment (Figures 8(c) and 8(d)). However, the articular pathological lesions and OARSI score improvement induced by EA treatment were not blocked by GlyT2 knockdown (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)).

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated that KOA induced bilateral ST35 sensitization and central sensitization while increasing GlyT2 expression and decreasing the extracellular glycine concentration in the bilateral dorsal horns of the spinal cord at L3-5. Either inhibiting GlyT2 function or reducing GlyT2 expression, especially on the ipsilateral of the spinal cord, was able to attenuate bilateral ST35 sensitization (Figure 9). These findings suggest that peripheral acupoint sensitization is modulated by the spinal cord and that elevated GlyT2 expression in the ipsilateral dorsal horn of the spinal cord may be a key mechanism for the induction of bilateral ST35 acupoints sensitization.

“Huang Di Nei Jing,” a well-known Traditional Chinese Medicine book in history, described “acupoint is where the pain lies.” This description is similar to the phenomenon of acupoint sensitization. However, it was not until recent years that the concept of “acupoint sensitization” was introduced [1]. In clinical practice, an important step in performing acupuncture is to find the sensitized acupoints. Sensitized acupoints can be used to induce better efficacy than nonsensitized acupoints. Sensitized acupoints may also have diagnostic therapeutic significance [28]. Acupoint ST35 is suggested to be sensitized acupoint in patients with KOA and acupuncture at ST35 has been demonstrated to ameliorate KOA-related pain and reduce joint destruction [2932]. However, no well-accepted scientific indicators exist to test acupoint sensitization and the underlying mechanism is still unknown. Because the sensitized acupoint is much more sensitive to pressure stimuli than nonsensitized acupoint, in the current study, we first used the acupoint area mechanical threshold to judge whether acupoint sensitization or not. Results showed that bilateral ST35 but not GB37 or a nonacupoint occurred sensitization in KOA rats. Mast cells are often located in acupoint areas [33]. These mast cells secrete numerous mediators that activate sensory neurons, which in turn activate the mast cells by releasing neurotransmitters or neuropeptides [34]. The link between acupoint sensitization and mast cell degranulation has been observed empirically [15, 28, 3537]. Our results showed that the total number of mast cells and the MCDR in bilateral ST35, but not in GB37 or nonacupoint areas, were significantly higher in KOA rats than in control animals. These tested points are all located in the L3-L5 somatosensory area, suggesting that sensitization induced by KOA is acupoint-specific.

The spinal cord is the first relay in the sensory pathways from the periphery to the brain. The CNS can be sensitized by noxious peripheral stimuli, after which it amplifies minor peripheral input into noxious stimuli [38]. Multiple lines of evidence support the concept that removal of glycine or GABA inhibition in the spinal cord leads to peripheral hyperalgesia [4]. Our previous report of a new mechanism of allodynia revealed that disinhibition of glycinergic neurons in the spinal cord is responsible for the hyperalgesia in a neuropathic pain model [39]. Similarly, Foster et al. found that peripheral hyperalgesia is accompanied by diminished inhibition of neurons in the dorsal horn [40]. Therefore, we presumed that the function of inhibitory neurons, especially glycinergic neurons, might be responsible for the acupoint-specific mechanical threshold reduction observed in KOA rats.

Glycine is a crucial inhibitory neurotransmitter that is released by both local interneurons and inhibitory descending fibers in the spinal cord. Glycine binds to strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors (GlyRs) and causes chloride ion influx into the postsynaptic cytoplasm. This influx results in hyperpolarization and raises the threshold for action potentials, thereby inhibiting the postsynaptic neuron. Aside from its inhibitory effects, glycine is also an essential coagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) class of glutamate receptor. Glycine also binds to NMDARs with 100-fold higher affinity than to GlyRs. Therefore, it was assumed that the glycine-binding sites of NMDARs are saturated under physiological conditions [41]. In this study, we found that the c-Fos increased but extracellular concentration of glycine decreased in the bilateral L3-5 spinal cord in KOA rats. However, intrathecal administration of glycine blocked peripheral acupoint sensitization phenomenon. Therefore, we believed that ST35 acupoint sensitization in KOA rats is mediated by central sensitization.

Extracellular glycine levels are controlled by the specific glycine transporters GlyT1 and GlyT2, which actively reuptake glycine from the synaptic cleft [42]. Both GlyT1 and GlyT2 subtypes belong to the sodium-dependent solute carrier family 6 (SLC6) of transporters, but they have different regional and cellular expression patterns in the CNS. GlyT1 is mainly expressed in astrocytes, with scarce expression on nonglycinergic neurons [43, 44]. GlyT2 is mostly present in the axon terminals of glycinergic neurons, where it is responsible for glycine uptake into the presynaptic cytosol [41, 45]. In the current study, we observed overexpression of GlyT2 but not GlyT1 in L3-L5 of the bilateral dorsal horns of spinal cord in KOA rats. Blockade of GlyT2 with ORG25543 or ipsilateral knockdown of GlyT2 expression in the spinal cord by shRNA resulted in increased glycine concentration in the extracellular space. Both manipulations also reversed the mechanical threshold reduction and mast cell degranulation elevation in bilateral ST35 but not in GB37 or the nonacupoint area. Therefore, we speculate that KOA decreases extracellular glycine concentration via increasing uptake by overexpressed spinal cord GlyT2, which in turn results in ST35 acupoint sensitization.

To investigate whether acupoint sensitization is involved in the therapeutic effect of EA against KOA, we used GlyT2-shRNA to desensitize ST35 in KOA rats. The results showed that EA could not ameliorate pain-related behaviors after ST35 desensitization, but it could still reduce joint lesion in KOA rats. This piece of evidence indicates that the spinal GlyT2-mediated ST35 sensitization is pivotal for EA’s analgesia effect, but the joint lesion reduction by EA may involve local regulation as well as central regulation which does not require GlyT2 overexpression. A previous study used transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at ST36 (Zusanli) and SP6 (Sanyinjiao) for rats with neuropathic pain and found that glycine concentration within the axon terminals in the spinal cord dorsal horn was significantly elevated compared to that of untreated or naive control rats [46]. This finding indicates that electric stimulation at certain acupoints may increase presynaptic glycine content in the spinal cord. However, whether the analgesic effect is generated by extra release of glycine into the synaptic cleft was not tested in their study. In the current study, knockdown of GlyT2 in the spinal cord disrupted the gateway of glycine reuptake and increased the extracellular glycine concentration, which in turn blocked peripheral ST35 sensitization. Knockdown of GlyT2 also blocked EA-induced pain relief in KOA rats, which further confirmed that spinal cord-mediated acupoint sensitization is important for EA-elicited pain relief. However, joint histopathological improvement induced by EA treatment was not reversed by intraspinal GlyT2 knockdown. These results suggest that the therapeutic effect of EA on joint pathology may be mediated by mechanisms other than the spinal cord glycinergic system. It has been reported that the endocannabinoid signaling pathway, beta-endorphin, and substance P are also involved in KOA-related pain relief by EA stimulation [47, 48].

In the current study, unilateral KOA, an inflammatory pain model, was used. Interestingly, unilateral KOA induced hyperalgesia in bilateral ST35 acupoints, but not GB37 or nonacupoint area. And this effect was mediated by bilateral excessive upregulation of GlyT2 expression. Up to now, we did not find any study that examined the expression of extracellular glycine or GlyT1/2 in KOA model. However, Villarejo-López et al. reported that the expression of GlyT2 was significantly increased in primary cultured neurons from the brainstem and spinal cord when treated by proinflammatory mediators or pain signaling molecules such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), substance P (SP), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or ATP [49]. And in the study by Han et al., they found that the increased expression of GlyT2 was positively correlated with pain frequency in the sickle cell disease patients [50]. In KOA model, bilateral spinal cord changes caused by ipsilateral injury were reported previously. Lee et al. found that pERK1/2 was increased in the bilateral spinal dorsal horns in unilateral KOA [50]. And in unilateral KOA model, 2-4-fold increase in mRNA expression was found for endocannabinoid targeted receptors (Cnr1, Cnr2, and Trpv1), endocannabinoid degradation enzymes (Faah, Ptgs2, and Alox12), and TRPV1 sensitizing kinases (Mapk3, Mapk14, Prkcg, and Prkaca) in bilateral dorsal horns of spinal cord [51]. Additionally, GlyT2 has been investigated as an analgesic target in various pain conditions [5, 23, 52]. Another possible mechanism is that contralateral effects are mediated by overlapping central terminals of afferents or spinal interneurons [53]. Monosynaptic rabies virus tracing revealed that most of the afferent labeled spinal neurons were found in laminae II–V ipsilateral to the injection side, while a few scattered neurons were found on the contralateral side [54]. An ipsilaterally projecting interneuron has processes crossing the midline to the contralateral side [55], indicating a possible local transmedian projection for neuronal activity modulation. Taken together, bilateral spinal cord changes caused by unilateral injury have been observed in other pain models including nerve injury and inflammatory injury [5663]. Despite the exact mechanism, GlyT2 as well as extracellular glycine that we have observed in KOA model was not reported elsewhere, we do believe that point is exactly one novelty of this study. Our evidence suggested that contralateral acupoint sensitization and GlyT2 changes as well as glycine variations were all derived from ipsilateral GlyT2 changes since knockdown of ipsilateral GlyT2 before MIA injection blocked all the manifestation in the contralateral side.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we first provide evidence showing that acupoint sensitization is an external manifestation of central sensitization and found that ST35 acupoint sensitization in KOA rats is induced by excessive glycine intake from the synaptic cleft by overexpressed GlyT2. The decreased level of glycine in the bilateral dorsal horns of the spinal cord is responsible for the sensitization of bilateral ST35 acupoints. And the analgesic effects of EA at sensitized acupoints require spinal GlyT2 expression. The exact mechanism of contralateral acupoint sensitization after KOA warrants further study.

Data Availability

The original experimental data used to support the findings of this study were included within the article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures had the approval of the Animal Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Fourth Military Medical University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Authors’ Contributions

Fuhai Bai and Yongyuan Ma contributed equally to this work. Lize Xiong and Jiao Deng designed the experiment. Fuhai Bai, Yongyuan Ma, Haiyun Guo, Yuheng Li, Feifei Xu, Ming Zhang, and Hailong Dong performed the experiments and analyzed the data. Fuhai Bai and Jiao Deng drafted the manuscript. Lize Xiong and Jiao Deng were responsible for the overall direction of the project and for edits to the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Ceng Luo and Fudong Wang for their technical assistance. This study was supported by the funds from the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81590954) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB543202).

References

  1. P. J. Rong, S. Li, H. Ben et al., “Peripheral and spinal mechanisms of acupoint sensitization phenomenon,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 742195, 6 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P.-J. Rong, J.-L. Zhang, and H.-Q. Zhang, “Interactions between tactile and noxious visceral inputs in rat nucleus gracilus,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 362, no. 2, pp. 162–165, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. J. Rong, J. J. Zhao, L. L. Yu et al., “Function of nucleus ventralis posterior lateralis thalami in acupoint sensitization phenomena,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 516851, 6 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Sivilotti and C. J. Woolf, “The contribution of GABA(A) and glycine receptors to central sensitization: disinhibition and touch-evoked allodynia in the spinal cord,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 169–179, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Hermanns, U. Muth-Selbach, R. Williams et al., “Differential effects of spinally applied glycine transporter inhibitors on nociception in a rat model of neuropathic pain,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 445, no. 3, pp. 214–219, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Cross, E. Smith, D. Hoy et al., “The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1323–1330, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Vos, A. D. Flaxman, M. Naghavi et al., “Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9859, pp. 2163–2196, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Lethbridge-Çejku, J. S. Schiller, and L. Bernadel, “Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey,2002,” Vital and Health Statistics, Series 10: Data from the National Health Survey, vol. 10, no. 222, pp. 1–151, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  9. E. Manheimer, K. Linde, L. Lao, L. M. Bouter, and B. M. Berman, “Meta-analysis: Acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 146, no. 12, pp. 868–877, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. S. Hinman, P. McCrory, M. Pirotta et al., “Acupuncture for chronic knee pain: a randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 312, no. 13, pp. 1313–1322, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Witt, B. Brinkhaus, S. Jena et al., “Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9480, pp. 136–143, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Cao, X. L. Zhang, Y. S. Gao, and Y. Jiang, “Needle acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee. A systematic review and updated meta-analysis,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 526–532, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  13. E. Manheimer, K. Cheng, K. Linde et al., “Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, Article ID CD001977, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  14. T. K. Selfe and A. G. Taylor, “Acupuncture and osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of randomized, controlled trials,” Family & Community Health, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 247–254, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. Ding, J. Jiang, P. Qin et al., “Mast cells are important regulator of acupoint sensitization via the secretion of tryptase, 5-hydroxytryptamine, and histamine,” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 3, Article ID e0194022, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Ma, H. Guo, F. Bai et al., “A rat model of knee osteoarthritis suitable for electroacupuncture study,” Journal of Experimental Animal Science, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 271–280, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. R. Sagar, S. Ashraf, L. Xu et al., “Osteoprotegerin reduces the development of pain behaviour and joint pathology in a model of osteoarthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 1558–1565, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y.-K. Zhang, Z.-J. Huang, S. Liu, Y.-P. Liu, A. A. Song, and X.-J. Song, “WNT signaling underlies the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain in rodents,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 2268–2286, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Liu, J. Nan, S. Xiong, G. Li, W. Qin, and J. Tian, “Additional evidence for the sustained effect of acupuncture at the vision-related acupuncture point, GB37,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 185–194, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Chen, G. Ning, M.-L. Zhao et al., “Mast cells play a key role in neutrophil recruitment in experimental bullous pemphigoid,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 1151–1158, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. P. H. Pritzker, S. Gay, S. A. Jimenez et al., “Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. R. Schaeffer, K. M. Woods, and G. M. Longo, “Rat jugular catheter model of biofilm-mediated infection,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1106, pp. 199–206, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  23. K. Morita, N. Motoyama, T. Kitayama, N. Morioka, K. Kifune, and T. Dohi, “Spinal antiallodynia action of glycine transporter inhibitors in neuropathic pain models in mice,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 633–645, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Reagan-Shaw, M. Nihal, and N. Ahmad, “Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 659–661, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Mingorance-Le Meur, P. Ghisdal, B. Mullier et al., “Reversible inhibition of the glycine transporter GlyT2 circumvents acute toxicity while preserving efficacy in the treatment of pain,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 1053–1063, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. J. Whitehead, S. M. Pearce, G. Walker, H. Sundaram, D. Hill, and N. G. Bowery, “Positive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor modulation by selective glycine transporter-1 inhibition in the rat dorsal spinal cord in vivo,” Neuroscience, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 381–390, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Wang, W. Wang, K. P. Patel, G. J. Rozanski, and I. H. Zucker, “Spinal cord GABA receptors modulate the exercise pressor reflex in decerebrate rats,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. R42–R49, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Zhao, J. Chen, Y. Li et al., “The long-term effect of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 508–515, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. Qi, Y. Tang, Y. You et al., “Comparing the effectiveness of electroacupuncture with different grades of knee osteoarthritis: a prospective study,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 2331–2340, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. Taechaarpornkul, D. Suvapan, C. Theppanom, C. Chanthipwaree, and A. Chirawatkul, “Comparison of the effectiveness of six and two acupuncture point regimens in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomised trial,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Ahsin, S. Saleem, A. M. Bhatti, R. K. Iles, and M. Aslam, “Clinical and endocrinological changes after electro-acupuncture treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee,” PAIN, vol. 147, no. 1–3, pp. 60–66, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. N. Nwosu, P. I. Mapp, V. Chapman, and D. A. Walsh, “Relationship between structural pathology and pain behaviour in a model of osteoarthritis (OA),” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1910–1917, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Quiroz-González, S. Torres-Castillo, R. E. López-Gómez, and I. Jiménez Estrada, “Acupuncture points and their relationship with multireceptive fields of neurons,” Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. O. Bauer and E. Razin, “Mast cell-nerve interactions,” Physiology Journal, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 213–218, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Zhu, X. Wang, M. Huang, Y. Jing, D. Zhang, and G. Ding, “Mast cell activation in the acupoint is important for the electroacupuncture effect against pituitrin-induced bradycardia in rabbits,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article no. 9040, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M.-L. Wu, D.-S. Xu, W.-Z. Bai et al., “Local cutaneous nerve terminal and mast cell responses to manual acupuncture in acupoint LI4 area of the rats,” Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, vol. 68, pp. 14–21, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. Shi, L. Qi, J. Wang et al., “Moxibustion activates mast cell degranulation at the ST25 in rats with colitis,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 32, pp. 3733–3738, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. D'Mello and A. H. Dickenson, “Spinal cord mechanisms of pain,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. Lu, H. Dong, Y. Gao et al., “A feed-forward spinal cord glycinergic neural circuit gates mechanical allodynia,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 4050–4062, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Foster, H. Wildner, L. Tudeau et al., “Targeted ablation, silencing, and activation establish glycinergic dorsal horn neurons as key components of a spinal gate for pain and itch,” Neuron, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1289–1304, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. Eulenburg, W. Armsen, H. Betz, and J. Gomeza, “Glycine transporters: Essential regulators of neurotransmission,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 325–333, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. Jiménez, E. Núñez, I. Ibáñez, F. Zafra, C. Aragón, and C. Giménez, “Glycine transporters GlyT1 and GlyT2 are differentially modulated by glycogen synthase kinase 3β,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 89, pp. 245–254, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. K. Yee, E. Balic, P. Singer et al., “Disruption of glycine transporter 1 restricted to forebrain neurons is associated with a procognitive and antipsychotic phenotypic profile,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3169–3181, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. B. Cubelos, C. Giménez, and F. Zafra, “Localization of the GLYT1 glycine transporter at glutamatergic synapses in the rat brain,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 448–459, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. Aragón and B. López-Corcuera, “Glycine transporters: Crucial roles of pharmacological interest revealed by gene deletion,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 283–286, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. L. Somers and F. R. Clemente, “Contralateral high or a combination of high- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces mechanical allodynia and alters dorsal horn neurotransmitter content in neuropathic rats,” The Journal of Pain, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 221–229, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. Yuan, B. Zhu, X. Jing et al., “Electroacupuncture potentiates cannabinoid receptor-mediated descending inhibitory control in a mouse model of knee osteoarthritis,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 11, article no. 112, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. N. Mohammed, H. Allam, E. Elghoroury, E. N. Zikri, G. A. Helmy, and A. Elgendy, “Evaluation of serum beta-endorphin and substance P in knee osteoarthritis patients treated by laser acupuncture,” Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Villarejo-López, E. Jiménez, D. Bartolomé-Martín et al., “P2X receptors up-regulate the cell-surface expression of the neuronal glycine transporter GlyT2,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 125, pp. 99–116, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Lee, M. Pai, J.-D. Brederson et al., “Monosodium iodoacetate-induced joint pain is associated with increased phosphorylation of mitogen activated protein kinases in the rat spinal cord,” Molecular Pain, vol. 7, p. 39, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  51. J. Mlost, M. Kostrzewa, N. Malek, and K. Starowicz, “Molecular understanding of the activation of CB1 and blockade of TRPV1 receptors: Implications for novel treatment strategies in osteoarthritis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  52. R. J. Harvey and B. K. Yee, “Glycine transporters as novel therapeutic targets in schizophrenia, alcohol dependence and pain,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 866–885, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Koltzenburg, P. D. Wall, and S. B. McMahon, “Does the right side know what the left is doing?” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 122–127, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Zhang, S. Zhao, E. Rodriguez et al., “Identifying local and descending inputs for primary sensory neurons,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 3782–3794, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. A. Quinlan and O. Kiehn, “Segmental, synaptic actions of commissural interneurons in the mouse spinal cord,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 24, pp. 6521–6530, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. H. S. Choi, D. H. Roh, S. Y. Yoon et al., “The role of spinal interleukin-1beta and astrocyte connexin 43 in the development of mirror-image pain in an inflammatory pain model,” Experimental Neurology, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  57. K. L. Schreiber, A. J. Beitz, and G. L. Wilcox, “Activation of spinal microglia in a murine model of peripheral inflammation-induced, long-lasting contralateral allodynia,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 440, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. H. Obata, S. Sakurazawa, M. Kimura, and S. Saito, “Activation of astrocytes in the spinal cord contributes to the development of bilateral allodynia after peripheral nerve injury in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1363, pp. 72–80, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. E. D. Milligan, C. Twining, M. Chacur et al., “Spinal glia and proinflammatory cytokines mediate mirror-image neuropathic pain in rats,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1026–1040, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Hatashita, M. Sekiguchi, H. Kobayashi, S.-I. Konno, and S.-I. Kikuchi, “Contralateral neuropathic pain and neuropathology in dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord following hemilateral nerve injury in rats,” The Spine Journal, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1344–1351, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Y.-J. Gao, Z.-Z. Xu, Y.-C. Liu, Y.-R. Wen, I. Decosterd, and R.-R. Ji, “The c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) in spinal astrocytes is required for the maintenance of bilateral mechanical allodynia under a persistent inflammatory pain condition,” PAIN, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. C.-F. Cheng, J.-K. Cheng, C.-Y. Chen et al., “Mirror-image pain is mediated by nerve growth factor produced from tumor necrosis factor alpha-activated satellite glia after peripheral nerve injury,” PAIN, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 906–920, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. J. Arguis, J. Perez, G. Martínez, M. Ubre, and C. Gomar, “Contralateral neuropathic pain following a surgical model of unilateral nerve injury in rats,” Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 211–216, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Fuhai Bai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

646 Views | 252 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.