Enzyme Research

Enzyme Research / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 837842 | 16 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/837842

Long-Range PCR Amplification of DNA by DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme from Thermus thermophilus

Academic Editor: Paul Engel
Received05 Mar 2014
Revised12 Dec 2014
Accepted18 Dec 2014
Published19 Jan 2015

Abstract

DNA replication in bacteria is accomplished by a multicomponent replicase, the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (pol III HE). The three essential components of the pol III HE are the α polymerase, the β sliding clamp processivity factor, and the DnaX clamp-loader complex. We report here the assembly of the functional holoenzyme from Thermus thermophilus (Tth), an extreme thermophile. The minimal holoenzyme capable of DNA synthesis consists of α, β and DnaX ( and γ), and components of the clamp-loader complex. The proteins were each cloned and expressed in a native form. Each component of the system was purified extensively. The minimum holoenzyme from these five purified subunits reassembled is sufficient for rapid and processive DNA synthesis. In an isolated form the α polymerase was found to be unstable at temperatures above 65°C. We were able to increase the thermostability of the pol III HE to 98°C by addition and optimization of various buffers and cosolvents. In the optimized buffer system we show that a replicative polymerase apparatus, Tth pol III HE, is capable of rapid amplification of regions of DNA up to 15,000 base pairs in PCR reactions.

1. Introduction

Thermus thermophilus (Tth) is an extreme thermophile which can grow at temperatures above 75°C [1]. Replication of the Tth genome is carried out by a multicomponent replicative polymerase similar to the well-characterized E. coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (pol III HE) [2, 3]. The replicative polymerases are composed of three major subassemblies: a specialized polymerase, a sliding clamp processivity factor, and a clamp-loading complex. The characteristics for replicative polymerases to replicate entire genomes relatively quickly are the speed of the polymerase and the fact that the polymerase is kept from dissociating from the DNA by virtue of being tethered to the substrate by association with the β clamp [4]. The β clamp forms a bracelet structure that encircles DNA and tethers a rapidly moving polymerase to the DNA [5]. The β subunit is efficiently loaded onto the double-stranded DNA in the presence of ATP by the DnaX complex. The DnaX complex is composed of the essential DnaX (/γ), and , and two accessory proteins (χ and ψ) [6]. The minimal form of the Tth pol III HE, composed of α, β, DnaX, and and , is capable of rapid and processive polymerization of DNA [7]. In previous work using NH2-terminal tagged forms of Tth α, β, DnaX, and and , we have shown that the proteins composing the Tth pol III HE exhibit the same characteristics as observed for their E. coli homologs. Each of the subunits is absolutely required for DNA synthesis by the Tth pol III HE. The same protein-protein interactions occurring in the E. coli holoenzyme also take place in the Tth pol III HE. In the NH2-terminal-tagged form of Tth pol III HE the rate of synthesis was comparable to that of the E. coli holoenzyme. Overall the Tth pol III HE behaves as replicative polymerases from other systems [7].

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method of DNA amplification is a powerful and sensitive technique. It has broad applications in molecular biology, diagnostics, detection, identification, and forensic analysis [8]. Since it was originally described [9] and presented at Cold Spring Harbor [10], PCR techniques and reagents have undergone significant improvements. The first improvement involved the use of a heat-stable polymerase from Thermus aquaticus (Taq), which eliminated the need to replenish the reaction with fresh enzyme after each cycle [11]. This improvement allowed PCR reactions to move from a slow deliberate process to an automated fast moving process. The remaining major limitations to PCR are the yield of product, fidelity of the process, speed of the polymerase, and the size of the region of DNA that can be amplified. Attempts to increase the yield of PCR products include addition of helper proteins [12, 13], the use of additives [14, 15], and optimization of primers for increased yield from small amounts of starting material [16].

Improving fidelity with the goal of producing error-free PCR products has been a substantial challenge and has many bioscience companies still looking for a solution. This has, however, led to the discovery of a number of new thermostable enzymes that have error rates improved from the original Taq polymerase [1719]. Yet with all these improvements the commercially marketed polymerases with the highest fidelity still misincorporate 1 base out of 16,000 up from 1 base out of 1600 seen with Taq polymerase [18]. Even with improved fidelity, the new high fidelity polymerases have the potential of one mistake in the amplification of every eight medium-sized bacterial genes.

Finally, efficiently amplifying very long regions of DNA has been a problem. Some approaches to improve amplification of long products include changing pH, using additives, decreasing denaturation times, increasing extension times, and addition of secondary polymerases [2022]. Other approaches have been to create new proteins by conjugating to or incorporating a processivity factor into an existing polymerase [2325]. However, most commercial PCR systems for amplification of long regions of DNA are a mixture, composed of a high level of nonproofreading polymerase such as Taq and smaller amounts of a proofreading enzyme [26]. The fact that many researchers are still striving to improve PCR systems indicates that a need remains for improved systems. Such a system would rapidly and reliably amplify long regions of DNA with high fidelity. We have exploited the properties of the multicomponent replicative polymerase that Tth uses to replicate its genome with the high fidelity required for genome stability to establish a system capable of high yield, high fidelity, and synthesis of long products.

Each component of the Tth pol III HE was purified as a native protein in order to avoid the problems that might arise by using proteins containing nonnative amino acid sequences as purification tags. We describe the purification of the subunits in their native form and show that the Tth pol III HE is rapid and processive in DNA replication. Under optimal conditions the Tth pol III HE is stable at temperatures to 98°C and remains active for the duration of the procedure. This is the first demonstration that a thermophilic replicative polymerase can function in PCR and amplify regions of DNA exceeding 15,000 bp.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. Construction of Expression Vectors

The gene encoding the tRNA nucleotidyl transferase (NT), the CCA adding enzyme, is contained within the NPTACCCA-1 plasmid (Figure 1) and is expressed at high levels (data not shown). To translationally couple the Tth genes to the NT gene nearly 98% of the gene encoding the tRNA NT was removed by cleavage with NsiI and KpnI. This resulted in only the 5′ 13 codons of the NT gene remaining. The dnaE gene encoding Tth α was then translationally coupled to the remaining 5′ end of the tRNA NT gene in two steps. First, the 5′ end of the dnaE gene was amplified by PCR. The sense primer (Table 1) added a sequence containing an NsiI restriction site, a ribosome binding site (RBS), and eight downstream nucleotides (six form a ClaI site and the last two are the first two nucleotides of a TAA stop codon which overlap the A of the ATG start codon of the dnaE gene). The antisense primer is complementary to a region downstream of a KpnI restriction site in the dnaE gene. The PCR product was cleaved with NsiI and KpnI and inserted between these restriction sites of NPTACCCA-1 creating the new plasmid pTAC-CCA-TEmp (not shown). This positioned the 5′ end of the dnaE gene downstream and translationally coupled to the gene encoding tRNA NT but in a different reading frame. Second, the remainder of the dnaE gene was removed from the plasmid pA1-NB-TE [7] by cleavage with KpnI and SalI and inserted between the KpnI and SalI restriction sites of pTAC-CCA-TEmp resulting in the pTAC-CCA-TE plasmid which contained the full length dnaE gene (Figure 1).


Gene amplifiedPrimer directionSequence (5′-3′)

dnaE5′SenseGGATATGCATTGAGGAGGATCGATTAATGGGCCGCAAACTCCGC
dnaE5′AntisenseCGGCTCGCCAGGCGCACCAGG
dnaNSenseACTGATCGATTAATGAACATAACGGTTCCCAAG
dnaNAntisenseGACTACTAGTCTACTAGACCCTGAGGGGCACCACC
dnaXSenseACTGATCGATTAATGAGCGCCCTCTACCGCCGC
dnaXAntisenseGACTACTAGTTTATTATATACCAGTACCCCCTATC
holASenseACTGATCGATTAATGGTCATCGCCTTCACCGGGG
holAAntisenseGACTACTAGTCATCAACGGGCGAGGCGGAGG
holBSenseACTGATCGATTAATGGCTCTACACCCGGCTCACCC
holBAntisenseGACTACTAGTCATCATGTCTCTAAGTCTAAGGCC
ssb SenseACTGATCGATTAATGGCTCGAGGCCTGAACCGCG
ssb AntisenseGACTACTAGTCATCAAAACGGCAAATCCTCCTCC

The dnaN gene encoding Tth pol III HE β subunit was amplified by PCR from plasmid pA1-NB-TN [7] using a sense primer containing a ClaI restriction site and the TA of a stop codon. This DNA sequence is in the same reading frame with the 5′ region of the CCA adding enzyme. The TA butts to the ATG start codon of the dnaN gene forming the sequence TAATG. As with dnaE, this places the dnaN gene downstream and translationally coupled to the gene encoding tRNA NT but in a different reading frame. The antisense primer added a downstream SpeI restriction site. The PCR product was inserted between the ClaI and SpeI restriction sites of pTAC-CCA-TE. This replaced the dnaE gene with the dnaN gene. The resulting plasmid was named pTAC-CCA-TN (Figure 1). The genes encoding Tth DnaX (dnaX), (holA), (holB), and SSB (ssb) were cloned into the pTAC-CCA-TE plasmid by the same process, resulting in pTAC-CCA-TX, pTAC-CCA-TD, pTAC-CCA-TD′, and pTAC-CCA-TSSB, respectively (Figure 1). The primers used for PCR of each of the genes are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Cell Growth and Preparation of Fraction I

Expression vectors were transformed into E. coli AP1.L1 (F-, ompT hsdSB(rB-) (srl-recA)306::Tn10, T1 phage-resistant isolate). Cells were grown at 37°C in F broth (yeast extract 14 g/L; tryptone 8 g/L; K2HPO4 12 g/L; KH2PO4 1.2 g/L; glucose 1%) plus 100 μg/mL ampicillin to an OD600 of 0.6–0.8 and expression was induced by addition of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to 1 mM. Cells were harvested at 3 hours after induction and were resuspended in an equal volume of Tris-sucrose buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10% sucrose) and quick frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Cells were lysed and the recovered supernatant constituted Fraction I (Fr I) [27]. For the initial purification step, the ammonium sulfate (AS) concentration in which >80% of the Tth target protein precipitated out of solution was determined for each Tth pol III subunit. The protein pellets resulting from AS precipitation of the large-scale Fr I solutions were quick frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

2.3. Gel Electrophoresis, Protein Analysis, and Reagents

SDS-PAGE analysis was performed using either 12% or 4–12% acrylamide precast gels (Novex NuPAGE; Invitrogen) with MOPS running buffer (Invitrogen). Benchmark unstained protein molecular weight markers were used (Invitrogen). Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford [28] using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Oligonucleotides were from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). All other chemicals were obtained from either Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburg, PA). Radioactive isotopes were from PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA).

2.4. Purification of Tth α

The 35% saturated AS precipitated protein pellets containing Tth α was dissolved in Buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 7.5), 25% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT) and clarified by centrifugation (16,000 ×g) yielding Fraction II (Fr II). Fr II was further purified using a Butyl Sepharose Fast Flow (Pharmacia Biotech) column equilibrated using Buffer A plus 1 M AS. The column (5.5 × 13 cm) was poured using 70% of the butyl resin. The remaining 30% of butyl resin was mixed with Fr II. To this mixture, 1 volume of saturated AS was added slowly while stirring over a period of 1 hour. This mixture was then added to the column and washed with Buffer A plus 1 M AS. The protein was eluted in a linear gradient beginning with Buffer A plus 1 M AS and ending in Buffer A plus 50 mM KCl. Fractions were pooled and the protein precipitated by addition of AS to 50% saturation. Protein pellets were resuspended in Buffer B (20 mM HEPES, (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5.0 mM DTT) and further purified using a Sephacryl S200 HR (Pharmacia Biotech) gel filtration column equilibrated in Buffer B.

2.5. Purification of Tth β

The 40% saturated AS precipitated protein pellets containing Tth β were resuspended in Buffer C (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 5 mM DTT) and clarified by centrifugation (16,000 ×g) (Fr II). The sample was heated to 65°C for 30 min and the precipitated protein removed by centrifugation (16,000 ×g). The soluble fraction was further purified using Q Sepharose (Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated in Buffer C plus 50 mM NaCl. The protein was eluted in Buffer C containing a 150–300 mM NaCl linear gradient. The fractions were pooled and the proteins precipitated by addition of AS to 50% saturation. The β subunit was further purified using Butyl Sepharose resin as described for α.

2.6. Purification of Tth DnaX (/γ)

The 35% saturated AS precipitated protein pellets containing Tth DnaX were resuspended in Buffer C, and the sample was clarified by centrifugation (16,000 ×g) (Fr II). Fr II was heated to 65°C for 30 min and precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation (16,000 ×g). The DnaX was purified using an SP Sepharose column equilibrated in Buffer C plus 50 mM NaCl and eluted in Buffer C containing a 50–300 mM NaCl linear gradient.

2.7. Purification of Tth

The 45% saturated AS precipitated protein pellets containing Tth were resuspended in Buffer D (25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 1.0 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT) and clarified by centrifugation (16,000 ×g) (Fr II). A Q Sepharose High Performance (Amersham Pharmacia) chromatography column equilibrated in Buffer D plus 10 mM KCl was used in the first purification step. Tth eluted in the column flow-through fraction. This pool (Fr III) was further purified using Macro Prep Methyl HIC Support (BioRad) column chromatography. The methyl resin was equilibrated in Buffer C plus 1 M ammonium sulfate. The column was poured using 60% of the resin. The remaining 40% of resin was mixed with Fr III. To this mixture, 1 volume of saturated AS was added slowly while stirring over a period of 1 hour. This mixture was added to the column and the flow-through fraction was collected by gravity. The column was washed with Buffer C plus 1 M AS and the proteins were eluted in Buffer C containing a 0.9 to 0.1 M linear reverse gradient of AS. Tth was further purified using a Sephacryl S300 HR (Pharmacia Biotech) gel filtration column equilibrated in Buffer E (50 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 7.5), 20% glycerol, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 5 mM DTT) yielding Fr V.

2.8. Purification of Tth

The 45% saturated AS precipitated protein pellets containing Tth were resuspended in Buffer A and purified using Butyl Sepharose Fast Flow (Pharmacia Biotech) resin as described above (Fr III). Tth was further purified using Octyl Sepharose Fast Flow (Pharmacia Biotech) column chromatography. The octyl resin was equilibrated using Buffer C plus 0.5 M AS. The column was poured using 70% of the octyl resin. The remaining 30% of octyl resin was mixed with Fr III. To this mixture, 0.5 volume of saturated AS was added slowly while stirring over a 1 hour period. This mixture was added to the column and washed with Buffer C plus 200 mM AS. Tth was eluted in the wash and was collected in fractions (Fr IV). Tth was further purified using a Sephacryl S300 HR (Pharmacia Biotech) gel filtration column equilibrated using Buffer E.

2.9. Optimization of the Thermostability of Tth Pol III Holoenzyme

The initial buffer used in M13gori assays contained 50 mM Hepes, (pH 7.5), 20% glycerol, 5 mM magnesium acetate (MgOAC), 1 mM ATP, and 50 mM potassium glutamate [7]. To increase the temperature at which Tth pol III HE retained activity, assays were developed (50 μL) in which the master mix (25 μL) (containing different buffers (at varying pH), concentrations of glycerol, MgOAC, and ATP) were mixed with 19 μL of 0.22 μg (0.004 μM) M13mp18 (New England Biolabs), 0.02 μM M13 primer (5′-GGGTAACGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC-3′), 0.05 μM , 0.01 μM , 1.4 μM β (monomer), 0.05 μM DnaX (monomer), and 0.5 μM α and cycled at various temperatures before adding 6 μL dNTP to start the reaction. Assays consisted of 5 cycles of melting temperature for 20 s, reannealing temperature (60°C) for 2 min, and extension temperature (70°C) for 2 min to mimic PCR cycles. The melting temperature was initially at 85°C, but as optimization of a component increased the thermostability of the holoenzyme this temperature was increased. DNA synthesis was initiated by addition of dNTP mix (40 μM dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and 18 μM [3H]dTTP (100 cpm/pmol)) and incubation was continued at 70°C for 2 min. The reaction was terminated by addition of 3 mL 10% TCA. The solution was filtered under vacuum through Whatman GF/C glass microfiber filters and the radioactivity retained was measured as described [7].

To test additives and develop an optimized buffer system to further increase thermostability of the holoenzyme, 16 μL of the optimized basic buffer (20 mM TAPS-Tris (pH 7.5), 15% glycerol, 15 mM MgOAc, and 1 mM ATP) and 6 μL of test component in various concentrations were mixed and cycled as described above. The reactions were initiated by addition of dNTP mix and continued as described above.

2.10. Assay to Determine DNA Synthesis in PCR-Like Reactions

Assays (25 μL) contained the optimized buffer system (the optimized basic buffer plus: 10% sorbitol (or 15% maltitol), 1% PEG 20000, and 1 M trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO)) and 0.22 μg (0.004 μM) M13mp18, 0.06 μM primer and 250 μM dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and 112 μM [3H]dTTP (20 cpm/pmol). Enzyme concentrations were the same as used in the thermostability optimization. The reaction was allowed to proceed through 20 cycles composed of 94°C/30 s, 60°C/1 min, and 70°C/2 min. Individual reactions were stopped after every other cycle to the end of the 20 cycles. The assays were carried out in duplicate, one for gel analysis and one for quantification of DNA synthesis. For gel analysis each 25 μL reaction was loaded into a well of a 0.7% agarose gel (15 × 15 cm) and electrophoresis was for 45–90 min at 100 V using a subcell GT apparatus (BioRad). Gels were stained for 5 min in TAE buffer containing 5 μg/mL ethidium bromide. The gels were destained for 15 min in TAE buffer and DNA bands visualized using a Kodak Image Station 440.

2.11. PCR Reactions

PCR reactions (25 μL) using pET Blue-2 plasmid (Novagen) as a template contained the optimized buffer system plus 200 μM each dNTP, 2 μM each primer, and 0.05 μg plasmid. Enzyme concentrations were the same as used in the thermostability optimization. PCR cycles consisted of 94°C/30 s, 55°C/1 min, and 72°C/2 min. Following cycling, the samples were incubated at 72°C for an additional 5 min. PCR reactions were analyzed using 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis as described above. Reactions using Taq DNA polymerase (18038-018, Invitrogen) for comparison were carried out as per the manufacturer’s conditions. The Tth holoenzyme and Taq polymerase reactions contained the same amount of primer and template in the same reaction volume. PCR reactions (50 μL) using Lambda DNA-HindIII Digest (New England BioLabs) as a template contained double the amount of enzyme.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning of Tth Proteins

We have previously expressed all of the proteins in NH2 terminal His-tagged forms [7]. However, difficulties in expressing Tth proteins as native proteins lead us to hypothesize that since the Tth genome is high in G/C content, the mRNA may have the potential to form secondary structure near the 5′ end of the gene that does not affect translation in Tth at elevated temperatures, but that greatly diminishes expression carried out in E. coli at 37°C. To overcome this problem, we designed a translationally coupled expression system. The plasmid NPTACCCA-1 contains the gene expressing tRNA nucleotidyl transferase (NT) under control of the pTAC promoter (Figure 1). In this system the tRNA NT is expressed in E. coli at high levels (to 50% of total cellular proteins). To translationally couple the genes encoding the Tth proteins to the gene encoding the tRNA NT, most of the tRNA NT gene was removed, leaving only 13 codons of the 5′ end of the gene. A sequence containing an RBS followed by a TAA stop codon was added in the same reading frame as the gene encoding the tRNA NT. In similar constructs, genes encoding Tth α, DnaX, , , and β were added in such a way that the start codon of each gene overlapped the second A residue of the stop codon. This coupled the Tth gene to the sequence encoding the tRNA NT 5′ by virtue of the new RBS, but in a different reading frame. All of the Tth genes were overexpressed in this system to 5–20% of total cellular protein.

3.2. Purification and Activity of Pol III Holoenzyme Proteins

Native forms of the subunits comprising the Tth pol III HE were expressed and purified as described in “Section 2” using a variety of purification schemes (Table 2) to at least 95% homogeneity by visual examination (Figure 2). Electrophoresis of the and γ proteins revealed minor bands migrating between the two subunits. However, western blot analysis using monoclonal antibodies against the DnaX protein indicated that the minor bands between and γ were degradation products of (data not shown). The γ form of DnaX also appeared to resolve as a doublet. Previous work indicated that even though the and γ forms of DnaX are encoded by the same gene, in Tth the mRNA encoding γ is distinct from that encoding , as a result of transcriptional slippage [29]. This work also indicated that two forms of γ were present. The smaller form of γ results from a −1 slippage bringing a UGA stop codon located two codons downstream into the same reading frame as the dnaX gene. The larger form of γ is a result of a −2 slippage which brings a UGA stop codon located sixteen codons downstream into the same reading frame as the dnaX gene. The dnaX gene in Tth also contains a translational frame-shift signature [30] which allows the expression of γ from a single mRNA encoding both and γ by a translation frame-shifting mechanism. Which mechanism is occurring during overexpression of Tth DnaX in E. coli cells is not clear.


ProteinStarting material
(g)
FractionTotal protein
(mg)
Total volume
(mL)
Total activity
(unitsa)
Specific activity
(U/mg)

α400Fr I (cell lysate)304201600
Fr II (35% AS)b8502001.1 × 1080.15 × 106
Fr III (butyl pool)713001.1 × 1081.6 × 106
Fr IV (S-200 pool)c107.52.2 × 1072.3 × 106
FR IV (reassay)d107.58.0 × 1060.8 × 106

β200Fr I (cell lysate)8780760
Fr II (40% AS)10002009.4 × 1070.1 × 106
Fr II (heat shock)1503808.1 × 1070.5 × 106
Fr III (Q pool)50603.2 × 1070.67 × 106
Fr IV (butyl pool)23201.7 × 1070.75 × 106

DnaX300Fr I (cell lysate)245001140
Fr II (35% AS)12582505.0 × 1080.4 × 106
Fr II (heat shock)5236005.0 × 1080.9 × 106
Fr III (SP pool)2004402.8 × 1081.4 × 106

300Fr I (cell lysate)15300930
Fr II (45% AS)185024003.4 × 1091.8 × 106
Fr III (Q pool)11524713.6 × 10932.0 × 106
Fr IV (methyl pool)141001.7 × 109123.0 × 106
Fr V (GF pool)5245.8 × 109122 × 106

200Fr I (cell lysate)190001400
Fr II (45% AS)40005401.5 × 10103.5 × 106
Fr III (butyl pool)909701.0 × 101015.5 × 106
Fr IV (octyl pool)152001.5 × 10990 × 106
Fr V (GF pool)4.1548.2 × 108200 × 106

One unit of activity is 1 pmol of total deoxyribonucleotide incorporated per min.
bThe initial assays in purification used a gap-filling assay to monitor nonprocessive polymerase activity [31].
cOne-fourth of Fr III was used to prepare Fr IV.
  α Fr IV was reassayed in the reconstitution assay described in Experimental Procedures.

Using NH2-terminal His-tagged forms of α, β, /γ, , and , we previously showed that each subunit was required for processive DNA synthesis [7]. Each of the native subunits of the Tth pol III HE purified here was titrated into identical assays to determine optimal activity for downstream assays (Figure 3). Each subunit was required for synthesis of DNA complementary to ssM13 DNA. The subunit stimulated an increase in activity to a maximum at 0.2 pmol of , but at greater concentrations of the DNA synthesis activity decreases (Figure 3(d)). When the native form of was titrated into assays in which the system contained all native subunits or in assays containing all His-tagged forms of the subunits the same results were seen. Alternatively, when the native form of was replaced with the His-tagged from of there was no decrease in activity observed (data not shown). This is likely due to the fact that acts to load and unload the β subunit onto the DNA [32, 33] and at high concentrations of (greater than the DnaX complex), the β subunit is preferentially unloaded, thereby causing a decrease in the processivity of the holoenzyme. It is possible that the NH2-terminal His-tag may interfere with the optimal ability of to unload β.

3.3. Stabilization of Tth Pol III Holoenzyme at High Temperatures

The α subunit has proven to be an Achilles heel for the Tth pol III HE to be active at increased temperatures. As an initial purification step, fractions containing α lost activity when heated to 65°C. To ascertain the heat stability, purified α was heated to 90°C for 2 min and 100% loss of activity was observed (Figure 4(a)). Under these conditions, α lost approximately 80% of activity at 80 or 85°C within 30 sec (Figure 4(b)). For use in PCR, Tth pol III HE must retain activity across multiple cycles of at least 94°C, so various reaction components and conditions were tested to identify optimal conditions. The melting temperature for each cycle was set at 85°C. Initially, assays were carried out in the presence of various buffers: Tris-HCl, HEPES, TAPS-Tris, TAPS-Bis-Tris, TAPS-KOH, HEPES-Bis-Tris, HEPES-Bis-Tris Propane, and TAPS-Bis-Tris Propane. Reactions were carried out using each buffer at various pH settings (Figure 5(a)). The condition promoting the highest polymerase activity at 85°C was 20 mM TAPS-Tris (pH 7.5). Optimal conditions for the other assay components were then determined to be 15% glycerol, 1 mM ATP, and 15 mM MgOAc (Figures 5(b), 5(c), and 5(d)). Under the new conditions contained in the optimized basic buffer, the Tth pol III HE retained activity to 91°C over the course of the reaction. During the thermal stabilization studies, assays were conducted in the presence or absence of Tth SSB and no difference in activity was observed. Therefore, SSB was not included in later thermal stabilization or PCR reactions.

Next, 59 different additives including cosolvents, sugars, crowding agents, detergents, betaines, salts, and metals were tested (Table 3). As one additive was observed to increase thermostability it was incorporated into the assay mix and subsequent assays were carried out at an increased temperature. Using this method an optimized buffer system was developed which contained 20 mM TAPS-Tris (pH 7.5), 15% glycerol, 15 mM MgOAc, 1 mM ATP, 10% sorbitol (or 15% maltitol), 1% PEG 20000, and 1 M TMAO. In this system, the thermostability of Tth pol III HE was increased so that activity was stable at 98°C for the length of the reaction (Figure 6).


CosolventsSugarsCrowding agentsDetergents

Glycerol (5–25%)a
Sorbitol (5–25%) 
Mannitol (2.5–10%) 
Maltitol (5–20%) 
1-Methyl-pyrrolidinone 
(5–20%) 
1-Methylindole (5–20%) 
2-Pyrrolidinone (5–20%) 
Acetamide (0.25–1 M) 
Trimethylamine N-oxide 
(10 mM–1 M) 
Tertiary butane (5–20%) 
Trimethyl ammonium  
chloride (50 mM–1 M) 
Methylsulfonylmethane 
(0.12–6%)
Trehalose  
(140–720 mM)  
Sucrose  
(60 mM–1.2 M) 
β-Cyclodextrin 
(0.72–7.2 mM) 
α-Cyclodextrin 
(0.84–8.4 mM) 
Glucose (3–21%) 
D-Fructose (5–20%) 
D-Mannose (5–20%) 
D-Galactose (2–20%) 
Arabinose (5–80 mM)
PEG 400 (1–5%) 
PEG 4000 (2–5%) 
PEG 8000 (2–5%) 
PEG 20000 (2–5%) 
CM cellulose 
(0.16–1.2%) 
Polyvinylpyrrolidone 
(0.01–3%) 
Polyvinyl alcohol 
(0.5–4%) 
Ficol (0.5–3%)
Tween 20b
NP-40 
Pluronic acid 
Zwittergent 3-08 
Zwittergent 3-10 
Zwittergent 3-12 
Zwittergent 3-14 
Zwittergent 3-16 
Chaps 
Chaps SO 
N-Octyl-sucrose 
Caprolyl Sulfobetaine 
Myristyl-sulfobetaine 
SB 3-10 
SB 3-14 
N-Octyl-β-glucopyranoside 
N-Octyl-β-D-thioglucopyranoside

BetainesSaltsMetalsOther

NDSB 195 (50 mM–1 M) 
NDSB 201 (50 mM–1 M) 
NDSB 256 (0.5 mM–1 M) 
3-1-Pyridino-1-propan-sulfonate (50 mM–1 M) 
Betaine monohydrate 
(0.25–2 M) 
Betaine hydrochloride 
(0.25–1.25 M)
Potassium glutamate 
(25–200 mM) 
Sodium acetate 
(25–200 mM) 
Sodium citrate 
(25–200 mM)
Zinc sulfate 
(0.25–2 μM) 
Magnesium sulfate 
(0.5–4 μM)
L-Proline (0.12–1.2 M) 
Ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA) (5–25 mM)

Values in parenthesis represent ranges of concentrations tested.
bDetergents were tested at two concentrations, at CMC and at 5X lower than CMC.

3.4. DNA Synthesis by Tth Pol III Holoenzyme in PCR-Like Reactions

We tested whether the Tth pol III HE could synthesize long DNA products during each cycle and for how many cycles this ability was retained. Using the optimized buffer system, we monitored the ability of the Tth pol III HE to synthesize long regions of DNA in PCR-like cycles. The template was circular single-stranded M13mp18 and the primer was a 30-nucleotide oligomer complementary to the template. The primer-template ratio was 15 : 1 and the reaction was allowed to proceed through 20 cycles composed of 94°C/30 s, 60°C/1 min, and 70°C/2 min. Two sets of assays were carried out in duplicate and reactions were stopped after every other cycle. The product from one reaction was analyzed for DNA synthesis by scintillation counting and the product from the duplicate reaction was analyzed by gel electrophoresis. An increase in activity was observed through 14 cycles and then remained constant; because of the 15 : 1 primer-template ratio at this point all the primer may have been exhausted (Figure 7(a)). The samples used for gel analysis allowed determination of the length of DNA synthesized during each cycle and the relative amounts of full-length product (Figure 7(b)). In Figure 7(b), the double-strand DNA (dsDNA) control contained both super-coiled double-stranded M13mp18 (lower band) and nicked double-stranded M13mp18 (less intense upper band). The ssDNA control contained circular single-stranded M13mp18 DNA. Since this was an asymmetric PCR-like assay, there was only one strand of the substrate amplified and unlike normal PCR, in which two primers are used, the amount of substrate did not double with each cycle but remained static. The top band (dsDNA product) is clearly the replicated circular ssDNA (now nicked dsDNA) that represents the annealed product and the original template. This band remained at approximately the same intensity because the double-stranded product from the previous cycle would have been denatured releasing the circular ssDNA template for use in the next cycle. The bottom band (circular ssDNA) is the circular M13mp18 template. The central band (ssDNA product) is the linear product from replication of the circular M13mp18 and migrates slower on the gel as a result of linearity. The graph in Figure 7(a) indicated more DNA was being synthesized; however the ssDNA product in the gel did not seem to increase beyond cycle 6. This was an artifact of the use of ethidium bromide to identify single-stranded DNA. The band representing the new ssDNA product was not quantitative since ethidium bromide interacts with ssDNA inefficiently and cannot be used to quantify single-stranded DNA. Since the circular single-stranded DNA contains supercoiling it interacts with ethidium bromide in a more quantitative manner. The noncycled reaction contained the same reaction mix as the cycled reaction, except the primer was preannealed to the template. This reaction was not cycled but was incubated at 70°C for 2 min and then stopped. This reaction resulted in a band containing nicked full-length dsDNA and a band containing apparently a partially synthesized dsDNA. There was no ssDNA substrate remaining, indicating that there was complete conversion of ssDNA to dsDNA. In the lane containing uncycled (zero) reaction, only circular ssDNA template was observed. The slight difference in the position of the ssDNA in the uncycled lane as compared to the ssDNA control may be due to a buffer-induced upward shift. Since there was no cycling, no annealing of primer to template was possible and therefore no DNA was synthesized. In cycle #2 there was no remaining circular ssDNA, but the circular ssDNA appeared in increasing amounts as the cycle number increased, indicating that all ssDNA was not being primed in later cycles. The linear ssDNA product (7249 bp) appears more intense in cycle #2; this is actually the overlap with another replicative product which appears to be migrating lower with every cycle. We do not know what this additional replicative product represents; perhaps this represents incompletely synthesized products or more likely it is circular single-stranded template with different levels of supercoiling. The results obtained from this experiment indicated that the Tth pol III HE remained stable in PCR-like cycles and was capable in each cycle of synthesizing DNA to over 7000 bp within 2 min.

3.5. Tth Pol III Holoenzyme in PCR Reactions

To determine if the Tth pol III HE could perform a PCR reaction, the activities of Tth pol III HE and Taq polymerase were compared. The substrate for amplification of DNA in the initial PCR reactions was pET Blue-2 plasmid (Novagen). The primers (Table 4) were designed to yield a PCR product of 200 bp. PCR reactions were carried out as described under “Section 2” and contained either Tth pol III HE or Taq polymerase and the reactions were performed for 5, 10, 15, and 20 cycles. The Tth pol III HE amplified the 200 bp DNA as well as the Taq polymerase did at each cycling time (Figure 8(a)). There appear to be shadow bands in the Tth holoenzyme reactions that are not obvious in the Taq polymerase reactions. We believe that this is a result of the interaction of the Tth pol III HE with this particular primer set because when different primers were used this was not observed.


Template DNAPrimer directionSequence (5′-3′)PCR product (bp)

pET Blue-2SenseTAATACGACTCACTATAGGG200
pET Blue-2AntisenseGTCGTTTTACAACGTCGTGA
pET Blue-2SenseTAATACGACTCACTATAGGG516
pET Blue-2AntisenseGCTAACGCAGTCAGGAGTATT
pET Blue-2SenseCAATACTCCTGACTGCGTTA1500
pET Blue-2AntisenseGAATGAAGCCATACCAAACGA
pET Blue-2SenseCAATACTCCTGACTGCGTTA2000
pET Blue-2AntisenseCACGCTGTAGGTATCTCAGTT
DNASenseCCGTTCTTCTTCGTCATAA4650
DNAAntisenseGATGCCGTTCATGACCTGATAA
DNASenseCCGTTCTTCTTCGTCATAA7500
DNAAntisenseGCAGCACAAATGCCACAGGTTCAT
DNASenseCCGTTCTTCTTCGTCATAA12500
DNAAntisenseCCATATTCTGTGCAATACCAT
DNASenseCCGTTCTTCTTCGTCATAA15000
DNAAntisenseCAGGCAGAGTCTCATGTAACT

Next, we determined the efficiency of the Tth holoenzyme in amplification of longer regions of DNA. Primers were selected that would yield a 500 bp product. The number of cycles in the reactions was changed to 15, 20, 25, and 30 cycles. In each of the reactions the amplification of the DNA by Tth pol III HE was equal to or only slightly less than that observed with Taq polymerase (Figure 8(b)). These assays also indicated that Tth pol III HE continued to have higher yields to at least 30 cycles. Next, primers were designed to yield PCR products that were 1500 and 2500 bp in length in 30-cycle assays (Figure 9(a)). In these reactions, the yield of PCR products from reactions containing Tth pol III HE was equal to that in reactions containing Taq polymerase. The Tth pol III HE PCR reactions contained more distinct full-length DNA products and fewer abortive DNA fragments than contained in the Taq PCR products.

To analyze the ability of Tth pol III HE to amplify longer regions of DNA, λ genomic DNA was used as the template. In PCR reactions designed to yield products approximately 5000 bp in length, the Tth pol III HE reactions were observed to contain at least 2-fold more PCR product than contained in the Taq polymerase reactions (Figure 9(b)). When the length of the DNA to be amplified was increased to 7500 bp, there was a distinct full-length PCR product observed in the reactions containing Tth pol III HE, but at this length, Taq polymerase was no longer able to produce a full-length PCR product (Figure 9(b)). It appears that Taq polymerase is not fast or processive enough to complete a full-length 7500 bp PCR product within the 2 min extension time. Finally, primers were designed to amplify 12500 and 15000 bp regions of the λ DNA. The PCR reactions containing Tth pol III HE yielded full-length products while no PCR products were observed in the Taq polymerase reactions (Figure 9(c)). The ability of Tth pol III HE to perform long-range PCR in a short time is consistent with its DNA synthesis rate of over 350 bp/sec determined using M13 substrates [7].

4. Discussion

Replication of cellular genomes is carried out by a specialized replicative DNA polymerase that is highly processive. In bacteria studied to date, this apparatus is composed of three functional components: the catalytic polymerase, a sliding clamp processivity factor, and a clamp-loading multiprotein complex. We have expressed, purified, and assembled this apparatus in its native form from the thermophilic organism Thermus thermophilus. We have shown that all of the functional components required in Gram-negative [3] and Gram-positive [34] mesophilic bacteria are also required in the Tth apparatus. Aquifex aeolicus, another thermophilic organism, also has been shown to contain a replicative polymerase with these functional components [35]. These findings suggest that all bacteria may utilize a similar mechanism in the replication of their genomes. We have shown previously that the same protein-protein interactions observed between the components of the replicative polymerase in the mesophilic bacteria also occur in Tth [7]. In this same work, Tth pol III HE was shown to polymerize the entire M13Gori template in one binding event, indicating that the replicase is highly processive. The entire 7.2 kb M13mp18 template was replicated within 20 seconds, yielding a DNA synthesis rate of at least 360 nt/s [7], which is similar to the rate of synthesis for replicative polymerases from mesophilic bacteria [34, 36].

The Thermus sp. is composed of extreme thermophiles which grow at temperatures greater than 75°C and in these conditions are able to synthesize thermostable proteins [37]. A higher proportion of charged amino acids at the expense of polar or noncharged amino acids, especially at the surface of proteins, appears to be at least partially responsible for the stability of these proteins [38]. Since Tth α was partially inactivated at temperatures above 65°C and completely inactivated at 80°C within 30 sec (Figure 4), this presented a problem for use of Tth pol III HE in PCR. An increase in thermostability was achieved through the optimization of the buffer, Mg++, ATP, and glycerol concentrations. This approach allowed partial retention of activity by Tth pol III HE to near 91°C.

Previous work has identified conditions that would allow increased stabilization of individual enzymes from both mesophilic and thermophilic origins. Certain cosolvents have been shown to enhance the thermostability of xylanase from Thermomonospora sp. [39] and Thermotoga sp. [40], alpha-chymotrypsin [41], and papain [42]. The stability of bovine pancreatic trypsin and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase were increased in the presence of different sugars [43, 44]. Detergents were used to increase the stability of a DNA polymerase purified from Thermotoga sp. at higher temperatures [45]. Betaines [46, 47] or the addition of chemical chaperones such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) improved the yield of active proteins and addition of metals was shown to stabilize the structure of misfolded proteins [48, 49]. These findings led us to test an extensive list of additives for their effects on the thermostability of Tth pol III HE. By iteratively testing additives and combinations of additives, we were able to increase the stability of the Tth pol III HE so that full activity was retained to 98°C for at least five PCR-like cycles and for 30-cycle PCR reactions in which 94°C was used as a heat step. To determine if the activity could be retained for the denaturation steps required for PCR, the Tth pol III HE was compared with Taq polymerase initially using primer sets that yielded short PCR products. The length of the region of DNA to be amplified was increased incrementally to determine how well Tth pol III HE performed compared to Taq. In these reactions the Tth pol III HE PCR products were comparable to that of Taq polymerase but contained fewer abortive product fragments.

Since PCR was first developed, the production or longer PCR product has been an ongoing goal and continues today [5053]. Since Tth pol III HE is able to synthesize the entire Tth genome in one binding event, we were encouraged to test whether it would be capable of long-range PCR (greater than 5000 bp). PCR reactions using λ DNA as a template were designed to determine if Tth pol III HE could produce long-range PCR products, and we showed that amplification of DNA regions up to 15,000 bp was possible. Taq polymerase produced no products in comparable reactions. The observation that Taq polymerase could not amplify DNA regions above 5000 bp highlights the importance of speed of polymerization for amplification of long regions of DNA. Taq polymerase in the presence of a secondary polymerase is able to amplify much longer regions of DNA (up to 35 kbp). To accomplish this, extension times have to be extended to as much as 26 min [21, 26]. This would increase the time to do a 30-cycle PCR reaction to as long as 15 hours. This suggests that an on/off switching time during the elongation step may be rate limiting and indicates a clear advantage of a single high fidelity, high processive polymerase.

This is the first time that a replicative multicomponent polymerase has been shown to have the ability to perform PCR. The advent of a single-enzyme system that is capable of amplifying long regions of DNA in a short period of time opens up exciting possibilities. Aside from the ability to do longer-range PCR the other major limitations of enzymes in use today remain to be, even though increased from that of Taq polymerase, a lack of a high level of fidelity seen with replicative polymerases [18]. Taq polymerase with no added proofreading function misincorporates nucleotides at a rate of 0.01 to 0.27 × 10−6 [54, 55], while higher-fidelity polymerases have been developed that are 10 times more accurate [18, 56]. However, the accuracy of the replicative polymerase from E. coli, pol III HE, in vitro, is approximately 700 times higher than that of Taq polymerase [57]. The current system lacks the proofreading subunit, epsilon, that contains a 3′ > 5′ exonuclease function and accounts for enhanced fidelity. In the E. coli system, base selection by the polymerase accounts for up to 10,000-fold higher fidelity than does the proofreading function of epsilon and the addition of epsilon only decreases the error rate by 3- to 5-fold [57, 58]. Therefore, the addition of epsilon to this system would modestly increase the fidelity but would likely have adverse effects on the rate of polymerization. In summary, the ability to amplify very long DNA regions efficiently and accurately could potentially be a useful addition to the list of improvements to PCR.

Abbreviations

Tth: Thermus thermophilus
Pol III:DNA polymerase III (α)
Tth pol III HE: Tth DNA polymerase III holoenzyme
DnaX complex:A complex containing DnaX (), and
RFII:Replicative form II
Taq: Thermus aquaticus polymerase I
RBS:Ribosome binding site
PEG:Polyethylene glycol
PVA:Polyvinyl alcohol
PVP:Polyvinylpyrrolidone
EGTA:Ethylene glycol-bis-(2-aminoethylether)
NDSB:Nondetergent sulfobetaine
CMC:Critical micelle concentration.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests in this submitted paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Charles McHenry for his guidance and support during this project. They would also like to thank Dr. Frank Dean and Yanmei Hu (University of Texas-Pan American) for their critical reading of this paper.

References

  1. Y. Koyama, T. Hoshino, N. Tomizuka, and K. Furukawa, “Genetic transformation of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus and of other Thermus spp,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 338–340, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Kornberg and T. A. Baker, DNA Replication, W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  3. C. S. McHenry, “DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: components, structure, and mechanism of a true replicative complex,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 29, pp. 19127–19130, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. J. LaDuca, J. J. Crute, C. S. McHenry, and R. A. Bambara, “The β subunit of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme interacts functionally with the catalytic core in the absence of other subunits,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 261, no. 16, pp. 7550–7557, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  5. X.-P. Kong, R. Onrust, M. O'Donnell, and J. Kuriyan, “Three-dimensional structure of the β subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: a sliding DNA clamp,” Cell, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 425–437, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. G. Dallmann and C. S. McHenry, “DnaX complex of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: physical characterization of the DnaX subunits and complexes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 49, pp. 29563–29569, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Bullard, J. C. Williams, W. K. Acker, C. Jacobi, N. Janjic, and C. S. McHenry, “DNA polymerase III holoenzyme from Thermus thermophilus identification, expression, purification of components, and use to reconstitute a processive replicase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 16, pp. 13401–13408, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Moore, “PCR: replicating success,” Nature, vol. 435, no. 7039, pp. 235–238, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  9. K. B. Mullis and F. A. Faloona, “Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 155, pp. 335–350, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Mullis, F. Faloona, S. Scharf, R. Saiki, G. Horn, and H. Erlich, “Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 263–273, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. K. Saiki, D. H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel et al., “Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase,” Science, vol. 239, no. 4839, pp. 487–491, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Motz, I. Kober, C. Girardot et al., “Elucidation of an archaeal replication protein network to generate enhanced PCR enzymes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 18, pp. 16179–16188, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Villalva, C. Touriol, P. Seurat, P. Trempat, G. Delsol, and P. Brousset, “Increased yield of PCR products by addition of T4 gene 32 protein to the SMART PCR cDNA synthesis system,” BioTechniques, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. Kovárová and P. Dráber, “New specificity and yield enhancer of polymerase chain reactions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 13, article e70, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Nagai, A. Yoshida, and N. Sato, “Additive effects of bovine serum albumin, dithiothreitol, and glycerol on PCR,” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 157–163, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. K. Reddy, S. Nair, and S. K. Sopory, “Global amplification of cDNA from limiting amounts of tissue: an improved method for gene cloning and analysis,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology—Part B Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Cline, J. C. Braman, and H. H. Hogrefe, “PCR fidelity of Pfu DNA polymerase and other thermostable DNA polymerases,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 3546–3551, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. McInerney, P. Adams, and M. Z. Hadi, “Error rate comparison during polymerase chain reaction by DNA polymerase,” Molecular Biology International, vol. 2014, Article ID 287430, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. S. Lundberg, D. D. Shoemaker, M. W. W. Adams, J. M. Short, J. A. Sorge, and E. J. Mathur, “High-fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Pyrococcus furiosus,” Gene, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. Kainz, A. Schmiedlechner, and H. B. Strack, “In vitro amplification of DNA fragments >10 kb,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 46–49, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Cheng, S.-Y. Chang, P. Gravitt, and R. Respess, “Long PCR,” Nature, vol. 369, no. 6482, pp. 684–685, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. D. Ohler and E. A. Rose, “Optimization of long-distance PCR using a transposon-based model system,” PCR Methods and Applications, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  23. Y. Wang, D. E. Prosen, L. Mei, J. C. Sullivan, M. Finney, and P. B. Vander Horn, “A novel strategy to engineer DNA polymerases for enhanced processivity and improved performance in vitro,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1197–1207, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Villbrandt, H. Sobek, B. Frey, and D. Schomburg, “Domain exchange: chimeras of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and Thermotoga neapolitana DNA polymerase,” Protein Engineering, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 645–654, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. F. Davidson, R. Fox, D. D. Harris, S. Lyons-Abbott, and L. A. Loeb, “Insertion of the T3 DNA polymerase thioredoxin binding domain enhances the processivity and fidelity of Taq DNA polymerase,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 4702–4709, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. M. Barnes, “PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from λ bacteriophage templates,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 2216–2220, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. G. Cull and C. S. McHenry, “Purification of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 262, pp. 22–35, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. Larsen, N. M. Wills, C. Nelson, J. F. Atkins, and R. F. Gesteland, “Nonlinearity in genetic decoding: homologous DNA replicase genes use alternatives of transcriptional slippage or translational frameshifting,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1683–1688, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  30. O. Yurieva, M. Skangalis, J. Kuriyan, and M. O'Donnell, “Thermus thermophilis dnaX homolog encoding γ- and τ-like proteins of the chromosomal replicase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 43, pp. 27131–27139, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. R. Kim and C. S. McHenry, “Biotin tagging deletion analysis of domain limits involved in protein- macromolecular interactions. Mapping the τ binding domain of the DNA polymerase III α subunit,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 34, pp. 20690–20698, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. Indiani and M. O'Donnell, “Mechanism of the δ wrench in opening the β sliding clamp,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 41, pp. 40272–40281, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. Jeruzalmi, O. Yurieva, Y. Zhao et al., “Mechanism of processivity clamp opening by the delta subunit wrench of the clamp loader complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III,” Cell, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 417–428, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. I. Bruck and M. O'Donnell, “The DNA replication machine of a gram-positive organism,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 37, pp. 28971–28983, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. I. Bruckv, A. Yuzhakov, O. Yurieva et al., “Analysis of a multicomponent thermostable DNA polymerase III replicase from an extreme thermophile,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 19, pp. 17334–17348, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. O. Johanson and C. S. McHenry, “The β subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme becomes inaccessible to antibody after formation of an initiation complex with primed DNA,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 257, no. 20, pp. 12310–12315, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  37. H. Nojima and H. Noda, “Kinetics of thermal unfolding and refolding of thermostable phosphoglycerate kinase,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1055–1065, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  38. C. Cambillau and J.-M. Claverie, “Structural and genomic correlates of hyperthermostability,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 42, pp. 32383–32386, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. P. George and M. B. Rao, “Conformation and polarity of the active site of xylanase I from Thermomonospora sp. as deduced by fluorescent chemoaffinity labeling: site and significance of a histidine residue,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 268, no. 10, pp. 2881–2888, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. D. Simpson, U. R. Haufler, and R. M. Daniel, “An extremely thermostable xylanase from the thermophilic eubacterium Thermotoga,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 277, no. 2, pp. 413–417, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  41. P. Lozano, “Effect of polyols on alpha-chymotrypsin thermostability: a mechanistic analysis of the enzyme stabilization,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. Lozano, J. Cano, J. L. Iborra, and A. Manjon, “Influence of polyhydroxylic cosolvents on papain thermostability,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 868–873, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Fernández, M. L. Villalonga, J. Caballero, A. Fragoso, R. Cao, and R. Villalonga, “Effects of beta-cyclodextrin-dextran polymer on stability properties of trypsin,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 743–747, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. Carninci, Y. Nishiyama, A. Westover et al., “Thermostabilization and thermoactivation of thermolabile enzymes by trehalose and its application for the synthesis of full length cDNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 520–524, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. D. Simpson, T. Coolbear, M. Vermue, and R. M. Daniel, “Purification and some properties of a thermostable DNA polymerase from a Thermotoga species,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 1292–1296, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. Spreti, S. Reale, G. Amicosante, P. di Profio, R. Germani, and G. Savelli, “Influence of sulfobetaines on the stability of the Citrobacterdiversus ULA-27 β-lactamase,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1008–1013, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. N. Expert-Bezançon, T. Rabilloud, L. Vuillard, and M. E. Goldberg, “Physical-chemical features of non-detergent sulfobetaines active as protein-folding helpers,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 100, no. 1–3, pp. 469–479, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. J. Bennion, M. L. DeMarco, and V. Daggett, “Preventing misfolding of the prion protein by trimethylamine N-oxide,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 41, pp. 12955–12963, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. H. Valladares, A. Felici, G. Weber et al., “Zn(II) dependence of the Aeromonas hydrophila AE036 metallo-Beta-lactamase activity and stability,” Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 38, pp. 11534–11541, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. H. H. Hogrefe and M. C. Borns, “Long-range PCR with a DNA polymerase fusion,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 687, pp. 17–23, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. S. Cho, K. P. Kim, K. K. Lee, M. H. Youn, and S. T. Kwon, “Characterization and PCR application of a new high-fidelity DNA polymerase from Thermococcus waiotapuensis,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 51, no. 6-7, pp. 334–341, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. P. Kim, H. Bae, I. H. Kim, and S.-T. Kwon, “Cloning, expression, and PCR application of DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Thermococcus celer,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 339–346, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. G. Davalieva and G. D. Efremov, “A new thermostable DNA polymerase mixture for efficient amplification of long DNA fragments,” Prikladnaia Biokhimiia i Mikrobiologiia, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 248–252, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  54. K. R. Tindall and T. A. Kunkel, “Fidelity of DNA synthesis by the Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase,” Biochemistry, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 6008–6013, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. A. Bracho, A. Moya, and E. Barrio, “Contribution of Taq polymerase-induced errors to the estimation of RNA virus diversity,” The Journal of General Virology, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 2921–2928, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  56. K. Terpe, “Overview of thermostable DNA polymerases for classical PCR applications: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 97, no. 24, pp. 10243–10254, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. P. T. Pham, M. W. Olson, C. S. McHenry, and R. M. Schaaper, “The base substitution and frameshift fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme in vitro,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 36, pp. 23575–23684, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. R. M. Schaaper, “Base selection, proofreading, and mismatch repair during DNA replication in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 32, pp. 23762–23765, 1993. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Wendy Ribble et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

3511 Views | 790 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.