The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 262710 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/262710

Optimization of Culture Conditions (Sucrose, pH, and Photoperiod) for In Vitro Regeneration and Early Detection of Somaclonal Variation in Ginger Lime (Citrus assamensis)

Academic Editor: A. Ouwehand
Received08 Nov 2013
Accepted29 Jan 2014
Published01 Apr 2014

Abstract

Various explants (stem, leaf, and root) of Citrus assamensis were cultured on MS media supplemented with various combinations and concentrations (0.5–2.0 mgL−1) of NAA and BAP. Optimum shoot and root regeneration were obtained from stem cultures supplemented with 1.5 mgL−1 NAA and 2.0 mgL−1 BAP, respectively. Explant type affects the success of tissue culture of this species, whereby stem explants were observed to be the most responsive. Addition of 30 gL−1 sucrose and pH of 5.8 was most optimum for in vitro regeneration of this species. Photoperiod of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness was most optimum for shoot regeneration, but photoperiod of 24 hours of darkness was beneficial for production of callus. The morphology (macro and micro) and anatomy of in vivo and in vitro/ex vitro Citrus assamensis were also observed to elucidate any irregularities (or somaclonal variation) that may arise due to tissue culture protocols. Several minor micromorphological and anatomical differences were observed, possibly due to stress of tissue culture, but in vitro plantlets are expected to revert back to normal phenotype following full adaptation to the natural environment.

1. Introduction

Citrus assamensis is a member of Rutaceae, an important underexploited, hybrid, evergreen, and aromatic tree. Citrus sp. is very attractive due to their distinctive fruits, colours, and attractive smell, unique from other plants. Containing high amounts of vitamin C, citrus fruits can be consumed raw or extracted for production of highly nutritious beverages. The percentage of citrus juice is an extremely important parameter for its industrial processing, being also related to fruit size [1]. Furthermore, Citrus sp. can also be used as traditional medicine, whereby the smell of citrus leaves and fruits can overcome headache and nausea. Tissue culture of Citrus sp. is very important to increase the production and mass propagation of this valuable plant. The use of tissue culture in the breeding of Citrus sp. is essential as it has the potential to overcome infertility of citrus seeds due to fungal infections by Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, and Sclerotium. Fungal infections caused the citrus seeds to be damaged before they can be germinated [2]. Citrus is generally propagated through budding, cutting, or layering. Therefore, propagation is limited to the period when buds are available [3].

In vitro micropropagation technology can overcome some constraints to Citrus improvement and cultivation and can increase fruit quality and resistance to disease and environmental stresses [4]. The size of the fruit is important not only because it is a component of productive yield but also because it determines the acceptance and demand by the consumers. The application of plant growth regulators can reenforce hormone balance in the peel, reducing or retarding precocious fall and unwelcome losses at harvest [5]. Very few literatures were found on in vitro regeneration of Citrus sp., particularly on Citrus assamensis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing the effects of different plant growth regulators on micropropagation of this species. The current study aimed to determine the optimum hormone for efficient regeneration of Citrus assamensis and study the effect of sucrose concentration, pH of the media, and photoperiod on organogenesis and callogenesis of this species. Ultimately, SEM and some histological studies were carried out on in vitro regenerants and compared with intact plants to detect early occurrence of somaclonal variation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Effects of Different Concentrations and Combinations of NAA and BAP on Callogenesis and Organogenesis of Citrus assamensis

Seeds of Citrus assamensis obtained from “Rimba Ilmu” or botanical garden of University of Malaya, Malaysia, were first washed with nondiluted teepol, followed by tap water. The seeds were then sterilised with 99% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 min and rinsed three times with distilled water. In a laminar flow chamber, the seeds were dipped in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 1 min, blotted with sterile tissue paper, and cultured on solid MS basal media [6] to produce aseptic seedlings. The media were added with 30 gL−1 sucrose and 8 gL−1 agar. After four weeks, the stem, root, and leaf explants were cut into small pieces (3 mm2) and cultured on MS media with 22 different combinations and concentrations of α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 6-benzyl aminopurine (BAP).

Each treatment was conducted in thirty replicates. The pH of the media was adjusted to 5.8 and autoclaved at 104 kPa (15 Psi2) and 121°C for 21 minutes. All cultures were maintained in a culture room at °C, with a 16-hour photoperiod with 1.496 W m−2 of light intensity. Subcultures were performed every 21–28 days to provide new and fresh nutrients under the same conditions.

2.2. Effects of Different Concentrations of Sucrose, Photoperiod, and pH of Media on Callogenesis and Organogenesis of Citrus assamensis

Different explants of Citrus assamensis were transferred onto solid MS media supplemented with optimum hormone combination (1.5 mgL−1 NAA and 2.0 mgL−1 BAP) but with varied sucrose concentrations (10 gL−1, 20 gL−1, 30 gL−1, 40 gL−1, or 50 gL−1) and pH (4.8, 5.8, 6.8, 7.8, or 8.8). Cultures were maintained at °C with 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness. Both experiments were conducted in thirty replicates. The effect of both sucrose concentrations and pH of the media on tissue culture of Citrus assamensis was monitored.

To study the effect of photoperiod on in vitro regeneration of Citrus assamensis, different explants of this species were cultured on MS media supplemented with 1.5 mgL−1 NAA and 2.0 mgL−1 BAP, 30 gL−1 sucrose, at pH 5.8. The cultures however were maintained under different light or photoperiod conditions, such as under 24 hours of darkness, 8 hours of light and 16 hours of darkness, 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness, 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness, and 24 hours of light.

2.3. Morphology and Anatomy of In Vivo and Ex Vitro Citrus assamensis Plants

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the differences between in vivo (intact) and in vitro leaves of Citrus assamensis. Number of stomata and trichomes present on adaxial and abaxial surfaces of the leaves were compared. Standard method and procedure for preparation of samples for scanning electron microscopy as described by Islam et al. [7] were followed.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Randomized complete block design (RCBD) was employed in all experiment. Data analysis was conducted through analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at 5% significance level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. In Vitro Regeneration of Citrus assamensis

In general, all explant cultures (stem, root, or leaf) had the potential to generate callus although stem and root explants were found to be more responsive than leaf explants. The highest callus formation was produced from cultures supplemented with 1.5 mgL−1 NAA and 0.5 mgL−1 BAP, whereby 100%, 60%, and 20% of stem, root, and leaf explants had produced callus, respectively (Tables 1, 2, and 3). MS media added with other hormone combinations were also found to yield production of callus, such as 1.0 mgL−1 NAA and 0.5 mgL−1 BAP as well as 2.0 mgL−1 NAA and 2.0 mgL−1 BAP (Tables 13). Stem explants were the most responsive for callus induction, yielding light green callus after only 20 days of culture (Figure 1). Green callus was also produced from leaf cultures after 40 to 50 days (Figure 1) although the explant type was the least responsive. However, root explants were found to yield a mixture of yellow (Figure 1) and green callus. Comparable results were obtained by Mukhri and Yamaguchi [8], whereby formation of callus was reported from Curcuma domestica rhizomes when the regeneration media were supplemented with BAP and 2,4-D combined as well as BAP and NAA combined. On the other hand, organogenesis was yielded when C. domestica rhizomes were cultured on Ringe and Nitsch [9] medium added with only BAP.


MS + hormoneObservationsCallus (%)Organogenesis
BAP (mgL−1)NAA (mgL−1)Shoot (%)Root (%)

0.01.0White callus formation after 20 days
Root formation after 30 days
NR
0.02.0White callus formation after 15 days
Root formation after 30 days
NR
1.00.0Shoot formation after 55 daysNR NR
2.00.0Shoot formation after 55 daysNR NR
0.50.5Green callus formation after 16 days
Shoot formation after 60 days
NR
1.00.5Greenish callus formation after 30 days
Shoot formation after 58 days
NR
1.50.5Greenish callus formation after 16 days NRNR
2.00.5Greenish callus formation after 25 days
Shoot formation after 58 days
NR
0.51.0Greenish callus formation after 20 days
Shoot formation after 35 days
NR
1.01.0Greenish callus formation after 28 days NRNR
1.51.0Yellowish callus formation after 28 days
Shoot formation after 50 days
NR
2.01.0Greenish callus formation after 30 days NRNR
0.51.5Green callus formation after 20 days NRNR
1.01.5Green callus formation after 30 days
Shoot formation after 50 days
NR
1.51.5Greenish callus formation after 21 days NRNR
2.01.5Green callus formation after 25 days
Shoot formation after 30 days
NR
0.52.0Green callus formation after 18 days
Shoot formation after 40 days
NR
1.02.0Green callus formation after 20 days
Shoot formation after 50 days
NR
1.52.0Yellow callus formation after 18 days
Shoot formation after 55 days
NR
2.02.0Green callus formation after 18 days
Shoot formation after 38 days
NR
3.03.0Yellowish callus formation after 28 days NRNR

Mean SE, . Mean values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at (NR: no response).

MS + hormoneObservationsCallus (%)Organogenesis
BAP (mgL−1)NAA (mgL−1)Shoot (%)Root (%)

0.01.0White callus formation after 35 days
Root formation after 35 days
NR
0.02.0White callus formation after 35 days
Root formation after 35 days
NR
1.00.0Shoot formation after 60 daysNR NR
2.00.0Shoot formation after 60 daysNR NR
0.50.5Yellowish callus formation after 30 days NRNR
1.00.5Greenish callus formation after 30 days NRNR
1.50.5Yellowish callus formation after 18 days NRNR
2.00.5Brown callus formation after 25 days NRNR
0.51.0Yellowish callus formation after 30 days NRNR
1.01.0Yellowish callus formation after 22 days NRNR
1.51.0Yellowish callus formation after 25 days NRNR
2.01.0Yellow callus formation after 20 days NRNR
0.51.5Green callus formation after 25 days NRNR
1.01.5Brown callus formation after 25 days
Shoot formation after 55 days
NR
1.51.5Yellow callus formation after 25 days NRNR
2.01.5Yellow callus formation after 30 days
Root formation after 50 days
NR
0.52.0Yellow callus formation after 16 days NRNR
1.02.0Greenish callus formation after 18 days
Shoot formation after 55 days
NR
1.52.0Yellowish callus formation after 18 days NRNR
2.02.0Yellowish callus formation after 16 days NRNR
3.03.0Yellow callus formation after 30 days NRNR

Mean SE, . Mean values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at (NR: no response).

MS + hormoneObservationsCallus (%)Organogenesis
BAP (mgL−1)NAA (mgL−1)Shoot (%)Root (%)

0.01.0Root formation after 30 daysNRNR
0.02.0Root formation after 30 daysNRNR
1.00.0No responseNRNRNR
2.00.0No responseNRNRNR
0.50.5No responseNRNRNR
1.00.5No responseNRNRNR
1.50.5Green callus formation after 35 days NRNR
2.00.5Green callus formation after 40 days NRNR
0.51.0Green callus formation after 45 days NRNR
1.01.0No responseNRNRNR
1.51.0Yellowish callus formation after 50 days NRNR
2.01.0No responseNRNRNR
0.51.5Green callus formation after 38 days NRNR
1.01.5Green callus formation after 30 days NRNR
1.51.5No responseNRNRNR
2.01.5No responseNRNRNR
0.52.0No responseNRNRNR
1.02.0Green callus formation after 50 days NRNR
1.52.0Green callus formation after 40 days NRNR
2.02.0Green callus formation after 40 days NRNR
3.03.0No responseNRNRNR

Mean SE, . Mean values with different letters in the same column are significantly different at (NR: no response).

Direct regeneration of shoots was produced from stem and root cultures, while leaf cultures showed limited organogenesis potential. The highest percentage of shoot formation (46.7%) was achieved when stem explants were cultured on MS media supplemented with 1.5 mgL−1 NAA and 2.0 mgL−1 BAP (Figure 1). It was also observed that high cytokinin (BAP) levels (2.0 mgL−1) aided the formation of shoots from explant cultures, compared to when low levels of cytokinin (1.0 mgL−1 BAP) were used. Formation of roots occurred readily from stem, root, and leaf explants cultured on MS media supplemented with 1.0 mgL−1 and 2.0 mgL−1 NAA. It was observed that root explants were the most responsive, yielding formation of roots within 18 days of culture compared to other explant types, which showed rooting after approximately 30 days. Furthermore, it was found that rooting occurred faster (18 days) when high auxin (NAA) concentrations (2.0 mgL−1) were used compared to 30 days, when low NAA concentrations (1.0 mgL−1) were used. Induction of rooting from leaf explant and production of multiple shoots from stem explant were depicted in Figure 1.

In general, tissue culture technology can be applied onto all plant species due to the basis that all plant parts can be utilized as explants. However, previous research suggested that herbaceous plants are generally more responsive and easily propagated via tissue culture protocols compared to woody plants. According to Abbot [10], woody plants exhibited lower propagation potential due to their complex and long life cycle. Clonal multiplication from mature tissues or organs of woody plants was difficult [11, 12]. Robb [13] stated that shoots of woody plants had long dormancy time than herbaceous plants; hence limited reports were found on successful in vitro propagation of woody plants.

Induction of callus often occurs at the wound site or the area from which the explant was cut, as shown by callus production from Cucumis sativus, Cucumis melo, and Cucumis metuliferus [14]. NAA and BAP when used in combination would encourage cell division [15]. Upadhyang et al. [16] also reported similar observations in Rauvolfia caffra, where 2.0 mgL−1 NAA and 2.0 mgL−1 BAP combined were most effective for production of callus. The use of auxin NAA was also beneficial in induction of rooting in tissue culture [14]. Induction of roots from shoot explants in woody plants occurred faster in growth media supplemented with IAA compared to when NAA was used [17].

The effect of sucrose concentrations, pH of the media, and photoperiod on tissue culture of Citrus hybrids was also studied. It was found that shoot formation was optimum when the media were supplemented with 30 gL−1 and 40 gL−1 sucrose (Table 4). Production of callus was the highest in stem and root cultures supplemented with 50 gL−1 sucrose (Table 4). However, it was observed that shoot and callus formation occurred faster (25 to 30 days) in media added with 30 gL−1 sucrose compared to media containing 20 gL−1 and 50 gL−1 sucrose (40 to 50 days).


Concentrations of sucrose (gL−1)ExplantsObservationsCallus (%)Organogenesis
Shoot (%)Root (%)

20StemShoots formation after 60 daysNR NR
RootGreen callus formation after 50 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

30StemGreen callus formation after 25 days
Shoots formation after 30 days
NR
RootYellow callus formation after 30 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

40StemShoots formation after 50 daysNR NR
RootGreen callus formation after 40 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

50StemGreen callus formation after 40 days
Shoots formation after 50 days
NR
RootYellow callus formation after 40 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

Mean SE, . Mean values with different letters (subject to different explant type) in the same column are significantly different at (NR: no response).

Furthermore, pH lower or higher than 5.8 was also found to affect formation of shoots from explant cultures. It was observed that explant cultures with pH of the growth media adjusted to 5.8, 4.8, and 6.8 yielded percentage of shoot formation of 46.7%, 33.3%, and 20.0%, respectively (Table 5). Shoot formation also occurred faster (30 days) in media at pH 5.8 compared to 45 to 50 days in media at pH 4.8 and 6.8 (Table 5). However, root cultures in media at pH 4.8 showed significantly poorer formation of callus than in media at pH 5.8 and 6.8. Although similar percentage of callus formation (46.7%) was recorded from root cultures in media at pH 5.8 and 6.8, induction of callus was found to occur faster (30 days) at pH 5.8 than at pH 6.8 (35 days). Owen et al. [18] stated that pH of the media in tissue culture system can influence in vitro shoot multiplication, floral and secondary metabolites development, organogenesis, production of adventitious roots, and cell division.


pH of mediaExplantsObservationsCallus (%)Organogenesis
Shoot (%)Root (%)

4.8StemShoots formation after 45 daysNR NR
RootYellow callus formation after 35 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

5.8StemGreen callus formation after 25 days
Shoots formation after 30 days
NR
RootYellow callus formation after 30 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

6.8StemShoots formation after 55 daysNR NR
RootGreen callus formation after 50 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

Mean SE, . Mean values with different letters (subject to different explant type) in the same column are significantly different at (NR: no response).

Photoperiod also affects formation of shoots, multiple shoots, and callus. Percentage of shoot formation was found to increase when duration of exposure to light was increased, whereby optimum shoot formation (46.7%) was observed when the stem cultures were maintained under 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness (Table 6). However, exposure to 24 hours of darkness had reduced the percentage of shoot formation to 33.3% (Table 6). The lack of light also aided callus formation, whereby stem cultures exhibited percentage of callus formation of 73.3% when stem cultures were maintained under 24 hours of darkness (Table 6).


Light exposure (hrs)ExplantObservationsCallus (%)Organogenesis
LightDarknessShoot (%)Root (%)

024StemWhite callus formation after 12 days NRNR
RootWhite callus formation after 35 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

816StemMultiple shoots formation after 16 daysNR NR
RootYellow callus formation after 40 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

1212StemGreen callus formation after 45 days
Shoots formation after 50 days
NR
RootGreen callus formation after 25 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

168StemGreen callus formation after 25 days
Shoots formation after 50 days
NR
RootYellow callus formation after 30 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

240StemMultiple shoots formation after 14 daysNR NR
RootGreen yellow formation after 30 days NRNR
LeafNo responseNRNRNR

Mean SE, . Mean values with different letters (subject to different explant type) in the same column are significantly different at (NR: no response).
3.2. Morphology and Anatomy of In Vivo and In Vitro Grown Citrus assamensis Plants

The morphology of 3-month-old in vivo and acclimatized in vitro grown Citrus assamensis plantlets was observed and compared to detect any morphological irregularities that might have occurred due to tissue culture protocols. In vivo plant was grown on soil and subjected to natural environment in the garden, while in vitro plantlets were taken out from the culture vessels and acclimatized in the greenhouse for 1 month prior to SEM and histological analysis. The mean plant height, leaf structure, leaf shape, and leaf diameter were measured and compared. Furthermore, leaf segments of Citrus assamensis grown in vivo and in vitro were also viewed under scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Jeol JSM-6400) to elucidate any micromorphological differences that might present, hence detecting any occurrences of somaclonal variation.

The microscopic studies of the structure of in vivo (intact) and in vitro leaves showed that the stomata apparatuses were generally anomocytic in shape. Oil glands were observed on both abaxial and adaxial surfaces of intact leaves but none on in vitro grown leaves (Figure 2). Stomata structures were observed on the abaxial surface of both in vivo and in vitro grown leaves but not on the adaxial surface (Figure 2). Interestingly, trichomes were only observed on primary veins of in vitro grown leaves (on abaxial surface) but none was present on in vivo grown leaves (Figure 2). SEM micrographs showing the stomata and trichome structures of in vivo and in vitro grown leaves of Citrus assamensis are depicted in Figure 2.

Histological studies conducted on both in vivo and in vitro grown leaves revealed that in vivo leaf had “V” shaped vascular system, with uneven hexagonal, circular, and oval shaped cells (Figure 3). The cuticle was observed to be thin with three layers of palisade cells (Figure 3). In vivo grown Citrus assamensis leaf also lacked oil glands, although a lot of “drusa” were present (Figure 3). On the other hand, in vitro leaf had “elliptical” vascular system, also with uneven hexagonal-, circular-, and oval-shaped cells (Figure 3). However, no cuticle layer was observed on the in vitro leaf, although two vague palisade layers appeared to be present (Figure 3). In contrast with the in vivo leaf, oil gland was present on the in vitro leaf, but “drusa” was absent.

4. Conclusions

Citrus assamensis can be regenerated and propagated through tissue culture technique, as clearly demonstrated in the present investigation. Young stem was the most responsive explant type. The highest shoot formation (46.7%) was observed on MS medium supplemented with 1.5 mgL−1 NAA and 2.0 mgL−1 BAP. Acclimatization of in vitro plantlets of Citrus assamensis was successful and the plantlets had survived after 2 months of being transferred to greenhouse. This process is important to examine the success of this technique in propagation of Citrus assamensis. Meanwhile, xylem and phloem tissue in the leaf vascular bundle in vivo were thicker and more complex than in in vitro leaf vascular bundle, when compared anatomically. Furthermore, SEM showed more scattered and different shape of stoma in vitro compared to in vivo. However, most of in vitro stomata were submerged compared to in vivo, where the stomata structures were observed to arise from the epidermal surface. Based on SEM and histological studies, only minor micromorphological differences were observed, with no distinct indication of somaclonal variation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, for the facilities and the Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP) for the financial support provided (Bantuan Kecil Penyelidikan—BKP Grant no. BK015-2013) to successfully carry out this research.

References

  1. J. L. Guardiola, “Frutificação e crescimento,” in Paper Presented at 2. Seminário Internacional de Citros—Fisiologia, Bebedouro, Brazil, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. H. Hume, Citrus Fruits (Revised Edition of Cultivation of Citrus Fruits), Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 1957.
  3. J. S. Rathore, M. S. Rathore, M. Singh, R. P. Singh, and N. S. Shekhawat, “Micropropagation of mature tree of Citrus limon,” Indian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. W. Grosser, “In vitro culture of tropical fruits,” in Plant Cell and Tissue Culture, K. Vasil and T. A. Thorpe, Eds., pp. 475–496, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  5. E. Primo, P. Cunat, J. L. Vaya, and J. Fernandez, “Estudio de la reducion del premature loosening naranjas “Navelate” mediate tratamientos with 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T,” Agroquimica y Technologia de Alimentos, vol. 6, pp. 360–365, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  6. T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 15, pp. 473–497, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. T. Islam, Y. Hashidoko, A. Deora, T. Ito, and S. Tahara, “Suppression of damping-off disease in host plants by the rhizoplane bacterium Lysobacter sp. strain SB-K88 is linked to plant colonization and antibiosis against soilborne peronosporomycetes,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 3786–3796, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Z. Mukhri and H. Yamaguchi, “In vitro plant multiplication from rhizomes of turmeric (Curcuma domestica Val.) and temoe lawak (C. xanthoriza Roxb.),” Plant Tissue Culture Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–30, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  9. F. Ringe and J. P. Nitsch, “Conditions leading to flower formation on excised Begonia fragments cultured in vitro,” Plant Cell Physiology, vol. 9, pp. 639–652, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. J. Abbot, “Propagating temperate woody species in tissue culture,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 28, pp. 155–162, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  11. O. P. Jones, M. E. Hopgood, and D. O. Farrel, “Propagating in vitro of M. 26 apple rootstocks,” Journal of Horticultural Science, vol. 52, pp. 235–238, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  12. R. L. Mott, “Trees,” in Principles and Practices of Cloning Agricultural Plants via In Vitro Techniques, B. V. Conger, Ed., pp. 217–254, CRS Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. M. Robb, “The culture of excised tissue 3Lilium speciosumthun,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 348–352, 1957. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Z. K. Punja, N. Abbas, G. G. Sarmento, and F. A. Tang, “Regeneration of Cucumis sativus var. sativus and C. sativus var. hardwickii, C. melo, and C. metuliferus from explants through somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis - Influence of explant source, growth regulator regime and genotype,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 93–102, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. K. H. Teo, Pengenalan Teknologi Kultur Tisu Tumbuhan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 1990.
  16. N. Upadhyang, Y. Makoveychuk, L. A. Nikolaeva, and T. B. Batygina, “Organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in leaf callus culture of Rauwolfia caffra sond,” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 140, pp. 218–222, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  17. I. M. Sulaiman and C. R. Babu, “In vitro regeneration through organogenesis of Meconopsis simplicifolia—an endangered ornamental species,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 295–298, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. R. Owen, D. Wengerd, and A. R. Miller, “Culture medium pH is influenced by basal medium, carbohydrate source, gelling agent, activated charcoal, and medium storage method,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 583–586, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Jamilah Syafawati Yaacob et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

4678 Views | 1494 Downloads | 8 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.